Tabatabai blog removal
Just to let you know, I have removed the post “Who and what is Sean ADL Tabatabai?”. Why? Because I’m sick and tired of seeing it at the top of my blog hits when it is now “has been” material and is hardly of any serious interest to me. This is, in part, why I stopped blogging. I recognised that, of all the deeply serious, substantive and significantly researched posts I have made re law, money, politics and terrorism etc, guess what got most hits? Anything and everything on David Icke, Sean and TPV. You know why? Well, in my view, it is because most people are still “The Sun” and “Daily Mirror” etc readers and just LOVE their gossip. So. although, at the time, the blogs I wrote re the foregoing were for a serious purpose, they are now old hat, boring, did the job.
Why don’t a lot of you actually find a fucking brain and use it?
Regards,
Earthling
OFCOM decide! UKIP is a party!
Just a quick one. I have to laugh (and do).
Here we see OFCOM deciding if UKIP is worth calling a major party. You don’t decide kippers, the British establishment does! And yet you think that UKIP fight the British establishment because that’s what Mr Farage tells you!
And you swallow it!
It reminds me of David Icke and his “We will be unregulated” (when speaking of the People’s Voice”). Indeed Dave and indeed Nigel. Two men who talk absolute shite!
But you will continue to because the British public (the majority at least) are really dumb bitches!
OFCOM RECOGNISES UKIP!
“Oh thank you your majesty!”
Ahhh why the hell do I bother!
The “Alternative” Paedophile
Paedophiles in government. Paedophiles in the monarchy. Paedophiles in the media and now, Paedophiles in the ALTERNATIVE media!
I wonder who those could be? I wonder if Davey and Sean (the big mouths of TPV, the guys who keep their spending of the money they raised from you close to their chests, the guys who sell you bullshit while they literally talk a globalist talk, have the hetero haters on the shows and the ex women MPs who have something to hide too) know who the alternative media paedos are? What do you think? After all, Davey knows it all doesn’t he? He knew about Saville (but didn’t say a word before it became public knowledge and then pretended he had said something. Even his ex colleague ran a story – yes Ms Poulton – saying Davey knew about Saville before it came out in mainstream when, in fact, he had never mentioned it at all beforehand but he likes you to think he did).
There is diseased shit under every rock folks so be careful who you consider to be on “your side”.
I have so much more to say about this paedophile eruption. Not exposing any, just commentary. But, right now, I just don’t have the “bandwidth”. I’ll get around to it though.
For now, here’s Bill Maloney – a brave guy I only met fleetingly once but his head was elsewhere I guess at the time. By the way Bill, if you stumble over this: The Bradbury Pound is the entirely wrong answer (sorry to those who believe otherwise).
One of the best things people could do (but won’t) is for them to drop their belief system in “heroes” – either those in uniform or those on the TV and in positions of (seeming) power.
But they won’t and you know why? This is why:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01zxmrv/the-men-who-made-us-spend-episode-1 (How long this will be on BBC iPlayer I don’t know but it’s the mentality – the “zombies”, those who are so easily led – which maintains the “heroes”. However, as you will see, we’re making “heroes” out of boxes too. The majority of humanity is dumb to the bone and so easy for the elite to manipulate that it’s not the elite – as perverted, sociopathic and psychopathic as they are – who are the problem, it’s the “zombies”. They are who scare the pants off me.)
And if you decide to watch the above and find it at all interesting, you may find the deeper probe into planned obsolescence even more interesting:
We’ll “buy” anything that’s “sold” to us as “Just what you need to be sexy!”
Meanwhile, back to paedophilia. There were once “perverts” and “poofs” – guys who liked to give other guys guy fluid up their ass or to swallow (let’s just call a spade a spade shall we? Or is the reality of it meant to be politically ‘correctified’ and brushed under the carpet like the time they themselves were “in the closet”? But they were given a name: “homosexuals”. Homosexuality was the mane of their “thing” rather than heterosexuality. But you see, having been given a name, the next step (over time) was to ‘normalise’ it and so those who considered it abnormal were then given a name: Homophobes and political correctness (arbitrary policy decided upon by the government(s) which you all know are corrupt – except, as in this case, when you THINK they’re doing the “right thing” under pressure from society (when in fact the elite steer what they want you to accept, you idiot)) put the negative focus on those who disagreed with the normalisation of it.
And it’s all done by ‘grassroots’ pressure groups and academics.
What we now have is the next step in human “enlightenment” which is slowly, delicately (and it will take years/decades just as it did for the homos BUT it will come and all you ‘liberal’ parents out there will have nothing to say and no comeback when your sons and daughters are being fucked (yes let’s call a spade a spade again) by old men and women whose paedophilia has been “normalised”.
Well done Mr and Mrs “Liberal” for being so liberal! 😉 But then perhaps it’s you who want to fuck kids right? But soon any criticism of you will be considered “paedophobic” or “hebephobe”.
Why just males? Women are into it too! But that doesn’t fit the media narrative. It’s another attack on men.
All I’ll say to this piece is: BULLSHIT! You have to be one sick mother****** to want to have intercourse with a child!
But no, the academics and the media are working their “magic” again to slowly creep towards the acceptance and normalisation of the paedophile. Lock up your sons and daughters Mr and Mrs conservative because the liberals and the perverts are coming for them. But don’t speak out too loudly because you’ll be labeled and termed a “phobe” and, even worse, an “extremist”. Do you have christian values in this JUDEO-christian country of ours? Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You’re on a list! The tables have flipped and the once oppressed (although they brought it upon themselves for the sake of a sliver of land in the middle east) are now the oppressors and you, Mr and Mrs Christian will soon wear the yellow badge! It won’t be a star however, it will be a cross!
TPV: David’s finally been rumbled!
Well, about a week ago, I put out a blog named “TPV: The people have spoken David”. However, it would seem they have roared. That’s what you wanted though David isn’t it? The people to roar like your Lion?
You should be proud of them. Aren’t you? 😉
Here was the funding a week ago:
And here’s the funding today:
Not only have you just managed to raise slightly over £3000 David and team but you’ve dropped the goal from £250K to just £50K. And it doesn’t even look like you’re going to hit anywhere near that!
I have to admit. I do get a modicum of pleasure knowing that people are no longer falling for it David.
I’m so glad for them!
After all, you’ll get your money. If the state gives you an OFCOM licence then they will surely back that up with the funding you require to do that propaganda job they want you to.
The trouble for them is – Are they investing in a lost cause now?
Gay TV
Now it becomes all so clear.
On the stroke of midnight last night, a little gay guy (I was not sure he was until now) made sure that, being in the media himself, he gets press for being one of the first gay “husbands” in the UK. And the media always make sure to cover their own and give them that much needed publicity which, in this case, Sean Tabatabai’s “marriage” certainly was.
Now all the tweets and the TPV predilection toward homosexuality and porn and, of course, their love affair with Peter Tatchell and transvestites etc all make the sense I had already sensed but could point to nothing specific which held it all together.
The “Guardian on the gates of the ethos” indeed.
Homosexuality, in a political sense, is a globalist movement and is being used to destroy the family. If you call yourself “awake” and you don’t understand something as well documented and easily understood as this, then please, don’t talk to me about your “awakened state”. You’re an ignorant twat. (Another few hundred readers have gone “poof”!)
They need to destroy the family to get at the children (physically with paedophilia and mentally with the NWO dogma being taught to them and their believing the state is their family). So all you “progressive” heterosexuals out there with children who are so “it’s the 21st century man” are fucking idiots! – just sayin’. Just like your acceptance and acquiescence all these years to the brainwashing of “political correctness” which now has you shitting yourself to speak your mind and, therefore, controlled. It has been that very same political correctness which has heralded in the gay state, the human rights of paedophiles and murderers and terrorists. And there you sit, complaining of it all and complaining about the paedophilia, the porn, etc. All of it brought about by your acquiescence to politically correct homosexuality. Do you flaunt your heterosexuality in parades up and down the country? But you’ve allowed theirs for decades and more and more, blatant sexuality has been spread over your screens and your kids have seen it while more and more of you – hetero or homo – as parents of children, have splashed your scantily clad bodies with your tattoos and your words on your profiles, across social media sites and online dating sites.
Every single one of you who has, has brought this society to what it is now as you sit and complain about your lot in life. You fucking deserve it!
But now this makes sense:
Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai
The words of an “enlightened” man. Rather misogynist but I’m sure Icke’s female fans will forgive him. After all, it’s only a joke right? Fish and slags. 🙂
Then again, perhaps there’s a reason for those descriptive words toward females? 🙂
So all you “ladies” who are so tuned in to this “The People’s Voice” in the belief it’s all about love and respect and truth, you keep believing while the guy (can you call him a guy?) who runs it along with his bum-chum, Icke, considers you slags and smelling like fish because you’re women.
You keep believing honey!
While Icke’s son already gave the game away about the plan – from day one – to be on satellite and voila! 6 months later, they’re coming to you all for your money once more to make it happen (but no, they never intended to get an OFCOM licence oh no! You thick TWAT!):
Now how did the young Icke know that “not originally but eventually”? In October last year!
How dumb a fuck do you wish to be taken for?
And they’ll launch. Your money or not, they’ll do it and you know why? Because I have said from the beginning, there are backers/funders behind this little bunch of sharks.
YOUR money is just being used for “slush funds”.
Meanwhile, I have to ask the question – although I have my own opinion: Is David Icke bisexual? Because you meet him in person, there’s a lot going on behind those eyes. Those eyes hide something very very deep.
TPV: The people have spoken David.
Do you ever get the feeling that, somehow, David Icke and friends are being told something they just don’t wish to hear?
From the original launch last year of their first Indiegogo campaign, asking for £100K then increasing it to £300K and getting it with no problem because a vast number of people “believed”; To now this – is it the third or fourth campaign? I’ve lost track. I think it’s the third. The second one asking for £400K (greedy bastards) and getting £100K. The first one, remember, all about getting “state of the art” equipment and premises which you kitted out for him and them, paid their wages etc then were provided with a third (or fourth) rate, dismal “tv station” which was, with that money, actually meant to have had studios in London and Los Angeles but, at the end of the day, they couldn’t even get London working right. A complete hash. A total disaster. Meanwhile, the promoted Sonia leaves under a cloud of financial “misadventure” by the station and about £260K of cash which had always been in Icke and Tabatabai’s company bank accounts but not a penny taken from it for THEIR business venture because they saw a gravy train- their own “central bank” creating money from nothing just for them. Who or what was that “Central Bank”? It was you!
And yet, here we are, 6 months from launch of that disaster, and the same people telling you they are going to broadcast via satellite (always the intention as stated by Icke’s son very early into first broadcasting as TPV) and the only way they could have had that planned was by having something which they said they would never have – an OFCOM licence. And yet they do – suggesting they were forced into it (with no non compliance dance by David) – and it would always have had to have been the plan.
So they’re looking for another £1/4 million from you and, with that, they are just dropping the “state of the art” equipment you already funded and the premises you already funded and have found new premises and a satellite to take them (not quite) global. It looks like they aren’t even covering America! One MAJOR market for them.
But, it would seem from this below, that the people aren’t “buying” it anymore. And, in fact BUYING it for you David.
And that is only a good thing in my view because it means those who, perhaps, thought they were awake before are now, seriously awake and far more discerning. Ironically, something David actually wishes them to be. Just not toward him.
So congratulations folks. I’m proud of you. “6 million views” but can only achieve £11K so far. One year ago that figure would be around the £150K by now.
Sorry David. You can fool some of the people some of the time…. you know the rest.
Who and what is Sean ADL Tabatabai?
David Icke and “The People’s Voice” has certainly come under fire in recent times – not least by me. I can assure you (and hope you recognise) that there has been good, solid, evidenced reason for that.
The OFCOM issue is just one but it is the most major one by far. It seems, however, that David Icke and TPV followers just simply refuse to get it, see it, acknowledge it, yet it is fundamental and how they can ignore their “hero” demanding of them that they just do a “non comply dance” when faced with the words “You must comply” by what we all know to be a corrupt government and establishment, then see that same “hero” comply at the first instance, to the very power he should be non complying with, is just pure cognitive dissonance. You ignore this entirely. You demand of people “What are you doing about all of this?”, “What have you done?” etc as if TPV and David Icke & friends have done anything. At the first hurdle, they comply. They have done nothing but set up a “TV” broadcasting station for their own ends. They are media people. That is what they do.
So what is it that is wrong with people? Why is it they cannot see what is right in front of their faces? WHAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE??
Anyhow, moving on… I’ve given you some input previously about this individual, Sean ADL Tabatabai. I mentioned the Magus Media company being wound down – and it is. However, I have just, up until now, looked at it all superficially in the sense that I have just looked at the company as a going concern (or otherwise), I have also brought up Tabatabai’s connections with globalist institutions (people ignore this too yet it is all fact). But here, I wish to bring one or two other factors to the table. Partly looking at ANOTHER company which Tabatabai was Director of just a few short years ago for about the same length of time he has been Director of Magus Media. Coincidence that these companies just last approx 2 years before being shelved?
Yet, he is the “Guardian of the ethos”. If you’re a guardian of it, then yes, you protect it but it can also suggest that you don’t reveal it because I, for one, have no clue what that ethos is when you’ve not meant to comply according to a certain twat’s ethos but he goes ahead and complies. Not guarded too well in that instance then is it?
Remember (or don’t, it’s entirely up to you) – this is the guy you are sending donations to. He is the ONLY Director of TPV. Yet, you don’t know the first thing about this guy? You know more about me! Would you send thousands of pounds to me? Certainly not! So why are you letting go your money to a guy who has started and wound up two companies in the space of 5 years? Not only that, you have no inkling as to who this guy is! None at all! Am I living in the Twilight Zone or something? Are people truly this gullible?
Here, once more, is Magus Media:
This is happening as we speak. He is dissolving this company. I went into the reasons why I think he may be doing that in a previous blog. If you look at the cash at bank plus the assets and liabilities, it is pretty clear.
But then there is this. Something I had picked up before but hadn’t looked at at all. Until now.
He had another Media company called The Commonage Ltd. He was a founder along with Miki Zoric.
AGAIN, this company lasted a couple of years before it was struck off.
You might notice there was a change in Credit score for the company. Was it because the credit score had improved? 🙂
Why was it struck off? Well it could just be that there were outstanding County Court Judgements against it! “Possible Adverse Information”:
What does “Possible Adverse Information” mean?
Now, you have to ask yourself: Have you ever watched “Rogue Traders”? Do you think it just applies to Builders etc?
Before you choose a builder or a double glazing company or whatever, do you check their background? You don’t? Well you damned well should!
So here you are sending money for other people to set up their very own broadcasting business for nothing (hasn’t cost them a cent), you don’t know them. They tell you what their ethos and philosophy is AND YET even when they do the opposite (OFCOM) you STILL believe them! And you STILL send them your money! AND you call yourself “Awake”? You just think you are! You’re actually sleepwalking!
However, this all gets deeper. Consider the connections I mentioned before – the globalist ones of Tabatabai. Now consider the NAMES you are faced with. Up until now, I had ignored this aspect as being a little “off the wall” – ADL Tabatabai; muslim. So what? But then you do a little searching of names and definitions because you see, first of all, a MEDIA company called “The Commonage Ltd” and your eyebrows raise simply because it is a very strange, non punchy media-style name to have for a media company. In fact, it is so non inspiring that it makes you think of “Werther’s originals”!!
That company name has had a reason behind it. What could it be? Common = Communism? Community? One people? One religion? Breaking down barriers? Faith foundation? One world? (think about his links with the globalist educational group) the age= New age, change, change agent?
Ok, so we’re speculating here. I grant you that but that is a STRANGE name for a media company!
So let’s turn to “Magus”. Magus Media. Ok, perhaps a LITTLE more “catchy” using MM. But Magus? What exactly does “Magus” mean or signify?
Let’s take a look:
Most people in the modern day know the Christian story behind Christmas; Mary and Joseph can’t get a room at the inn, and Jesus is born in the barn. Just after he’s born, surrounded by his parents and the animals, three wise men come bearing gifts. All we know about these men is that they’re from afar, and they have great skills at perceiving the coming of a new king. We also know that the word used to describe them is magi, which means that these men were learned in more than reading the stars.
Magi is the plural form of magus, a word which came into popular use around the year 1200 a.d. Magus, according to the Online Etymology Dictionary, takes its cue from the Greek word “magos,” which refers back even further to the Old Persian word “magush.” The original definition of these words uses them to refer to the priest caste of the Persian empire; men who were learned clerics in Zoroastrianism, which is said by some to have been the first true monotheistic faith. Begun at least as far back as the sixth century a.d., Zoroastrianism and Judaism are historically similar in age and they’ve been vying for oldest worshipers of a single god for centuries.
If we update the usage of the word magus though, it’s used to refer to a person that is learned in the ways of magick, someone similar to a sorcerer or a witch. Just crack any online dictionary, that’s what you’ll see. In fact many people have taken on the title of magus in more modern settings as a way of making them seem learned in secret arts; men like Aleister Crowley or Edgar Cayce have had this title used to describe them. After the occult revolution of the 1960s, and before that in the spiritualism craze of the lat 19th and early 20th century, magus was lumped in with all of the other occult terms and phrases which are now being used interchangeably to describe those that have a mastery of magic or secret arts that others are not privy to.
As the word magus has evolved, so too has its usage. Originally a term for holy men who served perhaps one of the most powerful religions of its time, the word eventually fell to describe those who were learned magicians, and then finally it was co-opted by members of occult societies like the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn or Stella Matutina, and now today it’s just one more synonym for a magician. However, it’s important to remember that the origins of words can alter what they mean, and that knowing the difference between a magus and a sorcerer, a witch, a warlock or a wizard can be an impressive piece of knowledge to possess.
So, on one hand, we could be looking at a Zoroastrian and, on the other, we could consider that he is an Aleister Crowley adherent. Also interesting that it has connections into the Golden Dawn. And yet, of all the names of companies this little twat could come up with, he uses the word “Magus”.
Zoroastrianism /ˌzɒroʊˈæstriənɪzəm/, also called Zarathustraism, Mazdaism and Magianism, is an ancient Iranian religion and a religious philosophy. It was once the state religion of the Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sasanian empires. Estimates of the current number of Zoroastrians worldwide vary between 145,000 and 2.6 million.
Zoroastrianism arose in the eastern region of the ancient Persian Empire, when the religious philosopher Zoroaster simplified the pantheon of early Iranian gods into two opposing forces: Ahura Mazda (Illuminating Wisdom) and Angra Mainyu (Destructive Spirit) in the 7th century BCE. (Illuminating and destructive?)
Zoroaster’s ideas led to a formal religion bearing his name by about the 6th century BCE and have influenced other later religions including Judaism, Gnosticism, Christianity and Islam
Now, we know, from Tabatabai’s own words that he despises christianity. Let’s just review that for the sake of those who may not have seen it:
Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai
Now Tabatabai may be muslim born and even, partially, bred just as I was catholic. But just as I no longer adhere to any religion (but I don’t hate anyone of any religion), as you can see, this guy has a fervent hatred of christianity and prefers paganism. I’ve now noticed quite a few “truther” sites and people who are promoting paganism. David icke is doing precisely that. But that’s just a wrapper so to speak. There are a hell of a lot of agendas in this TPV thing and they ain’t good. I read somewhere just today, someone saying there was conflicting stories between my experience in TPV and those of Sharon Giffords. Not true. The commenter stated I was talking about there being a “feminist” agenda promulgated by TPV (and there is) while Sharon was saying that comments made in the studio were very sexist. There is NO conflict there! What you are confused about is very simple: The agenda of TPV in broadcasting to the world via its output is anti heterosexual male and that is being pushed for a political end while the sexist remarks are personnel within TPV just being twats. These people do not believe what they are saying or promoting but what they promote corporately is to achieve a goal! Do you think the Rockefellers promoted feminism because they are interested in women? Because they like women and feel sorry for their “predicament”? NO! Don’t be so fricking naive! Do you think the British government promote and accept the immigration into the UK because they care for muslims and poles and Eastern Europeans? NO! Don’t be so fricking naive! Is the gay rights movement, from a state and government perspective, because these people feel for the “predicament” of gays? NO! Don’t be so fricking naive! Do you think children’s rights are because the establishment care about children? ARE YOU SERIOUS?
Back to “MAGUS” for a moment:
The John Fowles book “THE MAGUS” –
‘The Magus’ tells the tale of a young Englishman, Nicholas d’Urfe who takes up a job as a schoolmaster on a Greek island, Phraxos where he meets a rich and mysterious character called Conchis .
Urfe becomes embroiled in the psychological illusions of a master trickster, which become increasingly dark and serious.
Nicholas is gradually drawn into Conchis’s psychological games, his paradoxical views on life, his mysterious persona, and his eccentric masques. At first, Nicholas takes these posturings of Conchis, what the novel terms the “godgame,” to be a joke, but they grow more elaborate and intense. Nicholas loses his ability to determine what is real and what is artifice.
Conchis embroils Nicholas in ever increasing bizarre ‘masques’, such as a fake Nazi execution and a false ritual involving men and women in strange costumes similar to the Black Mass scene from ‘Eyes Wide Shut’, as well as a the fake suicide of his girlfriend . Click Wikipedia for a fuller review . At the end, it is revealed all the games are intended to give Nicholas a deeper insight into himself and ‘Life’ .
Doesn’t that sum up what David Icke and Sean ADL Tabatabai are doing rather well to their audience? I’d say so. I’d put money on it that this is precisely why Tabatabai decided to name his media company “MAGUS”.
I am very suspicious of the veracity of recent news stories such as Boston, Woolwich and the Syrian chemical attack and believe that we may be caught up in a similar sort of game as described in ‘The Magus’, but without the good intention of Conchis . We are manipulated to react in certain ways to these events, so that agendas can be fulfilled .
But ultimately, I think the aim is ‘spiritual’ rather than money and power . Behind all the ‘flickering pixels’ that we see in the media, is a force that is just as strong and inflexible in its spiritual beliefs as the most extreme Christian, Moslem, Jewish, etc fundamentalist, which is endeavouring to bring in not only a change in the way the world is governed but a new spiritual perspective and maybe it’s always been so . It believes in Might is Right, the love of Death, the supremacy of the physical over the spiritual and hatred of true Love .
Every aspect of what they do within these seemingly separate agendas, is to destroy the fabric of society and to destroy the “nuclear family”. Do you think any of it means they will, personally, act accordingly? NO! So get your heads working for christ’s sakes!
TPV is a change agent and Sean ADL Tabatabai and David Icke are attempting to do exactly that! What’s with the poofs, Edwina Curry and pornstars on the shows? You’re getting led by the balls (if you have any).
Lastly, the name Tabatabai:
Tabatabai is a very specific branch of the Saadaat with Imam al-Hasan in the patrilineal ascent via his son, Hasan al-Muthanna.
The number of Hasani Saadaat, like the Tabatabais, are far fewer than the Husayni Saadaat. The former (Hasani Saadaat) include the Hashemite Jordanian Royal Family.
Tabatabai is part of the Hasani Saadaat bloodline group and as such are descendants of Hasan ibn Ali, eldest grandson of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed.
Sean’s full surname translates as God’s justice delivered through the line of Mohammed.
adl = god’s justice.
Tabatabai = one of the Hasani Saadaat bloodlines.
You have a poor sense of smell if you don’t smell something rotting in all of this.
Queen Elizabeth crowd sources on Indiegogo
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth has found herself down to her last £million while a palace insider stated she had approached David Icke for advice regarding donation funding. Mr Icke, a world renowned conspiracy theorist, is reported as having pointed her majesty toward the Indiegogo website.
Next she’ll be down the local pawnbrokers with her diamonds and tiaras and selling her shares which are protected from the population’s general knowledge.
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, long thought to be one of the world’s richest women, is apparently down to her last million in savings, with palaces leaking and falling to pieces as MPs say she has been failed by her advisers and the Treasury.
The Queen’s courtiers have been advised to take money saving tips from the UK treasury, as her finances dip to an historic low with just £1 million left in reserve, the Telegraph reported.
A report by the Commons Public Accounts Committee found that her reserve fund had fallen from £35 million in 2001 to £1 million today. While the Royal household had made efficiency savings of just 5 percent over the past five years, government departments have made savings of up to a third.
MPs on the committee said that the Treasury must help to protect royal palaces from further damage and deterioration.
“We believe that the Treasury has a duty to be actively involved in reviewing the household’s financial planning and management – and it has failed to do so,” said Margaret Hodge, the Labour chairperson of the committee.
Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle are both in a terrible state of repair with staff required to catch rain in buckets to protect art and antiquities.
Meanwhile, in Buckingham Palace the 60-year-old boilers were running up bills of £774,000 a year and the wiring has not been replaced since 1949. More than a third of the royal estate has been found to be below “target condition.”
The committee compared Buckingham Palace, which has just 500,000 visitors a year, to the Tower of London, which has more than £2 million.
“If you look at the Tower of London and its visitor numbers it makes you think that there’s potential here. Have they done their darnedest to maximize value for money?” Hodge said.
The report also found that the royal household has not even attempted to cost up its huge backlog of repairs because it believed there was no point in doing so until it has new funding in place.
The Crown Estate gets 15 percent of its income from the Sovereign Grant, which replaced the old way of funding the Royal Family through the civil list in 2012.
While the Royal Household’s net expenditure was £33.3 million last year, £31 million of this came from the Sovereign Grant. To find the difference, it had to dip into its reserve fund.
A spokesman for Buckingham Palace insisted that the Sovereign Grant had made the Queen’s funding “more transparent and scrutinized” and was resulting in a “more efficient use of public funds.”
But the committee found that much more needs to be done if the Crown Estate and the Royal Household are to properly manage the Queen’s finances.
“We got the impression that they just haven’t tried to make greater savings. Here we are, we’re all in it together, but they are failing to eke out better value for the Queen. They are dipping into their reserves in a way that just isn’t sensible,” Hodge said.
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II unveils a plaque during an official visit to The Shard building in central London, on November 21, 2013. The Queen and her husband Prince Philip toured the viewing deck of the country’s highest building Thursday. AFP PHOTO / STEFAN ROUSSEAU/POOL
The report found that the Treasury was not doing its job properly. It is responsible for overseeing the Royal Household finances but is not doing enough and should draw on its extensive experience and “offer advice on key packages.”
“The Household needs to get better at planning and managing its budgets for the longer term – and the Treasury should be more actively involved in reviewing what the household is doing,” Hodge said.
Number crunching
A closer look at both the report and the figures in it reveals that the Queens finances may be healthier than the Committee found, and in areas where she has lost money it is not the fault of the Treasury but of her managers, the Guardian reports.
The report its self was compiled from a series of questions and answers with just two witness giving the answers, Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse and Mike Stevens, Deputy Treasurer to the Queen.
When asked why they did not cut back their expenditure, Sir Alan Reid replies: “We really believed that it is not wise to cut back on the level of activity of the monarchy.”
The figure of 1 million pounds does not accurately reflect the value of assets held by the Royal Household, the Guardian says. Their total reserves stand at 14.2 million pounds, 11.8 million pounds of which comes from property, plant and other equipment.The biggest chunk of royal spending goes on payroll, and although staff numbers remained unchanged over the past year cost have risen considerably.
Austin Mitchell, one of the members of the committee, asked: “It looks to me that you managed to survive and manage the finances by letting the buildings deteriorate, by freezing the staff costs and by digging into the reserves. Is that a fair summary of what has happened?”
To which Sir Alan replied, “I think that does summarize, to a degree, what happened last year.”
Indiegogo
However, the last minute intervention of Mr Icke may have just saved the Queen’s bacon. There are rumours within the establishment that, due to Mr Icke’s advice and enlightenment of the Queen on how to make vast sums of money out of people without going to the bank for a loan, the Queen had a quiet word with her cabinet and the secretary of state for media, to give Mr Icke a pass regarding the requirement, by OFCOM, that no politically motivated person can hold a British broadcasting licence. Mr Icke seems to have quietly apologised to the Queen for calling her a reptile all these years and she quietly pronounced him a Knight of St John of Jerusalem even though he has no royal lineage. He did much the same, quietly while telling poll tax protestors he wouldn’t pay his either but then quietly did so. The Queen likes the name David since it originates from King David as she believes she does. She’s very happy with David Cameron and David Dimbleby we hear also. David Beckham also got a kind word from the Queen although she quietly mentioned to him that she thought Posh was a bit of a slag.
Below, you can see the Queen in her Indiegogo campaign requesting donations to upgrade her property’s boilers. Seemingly, her majesty is not aware that the government runs a free boiler programme for the elderly and those on certain benefits. Perhaps if she were to let her £1million run down to less than £6,000 in the bank then she would qualify and wouldn’t have to come scrounging off the subjects she and her family have lived off their entire lives.
MUSIC: Well it had to be The Flying Lizards right?
TPV: We’re transparent! (yes indeed you are!)
THE MAN WHO HATES THE SYSTEM THEN PROMOTES THE SYSTEM AS HIS ASSURANCE TO HIS AUDIENCE THAT HE WILL BE TRANSPARENT. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS SHIT UP AND GET AWAY WITH IT – UNLESS YOU’RE DAVID ICKE!
TPV have just issued a statement on transparency and this is it:
When we decided upon a legal structure through which to operate TPV we had to balance the need for transparency against cost and regulation. (No mention of this at all until they came under intense scrutiny. Further – and this is a very important point – re the regulation: David Icke and team stated that they chose the Private Limited Company vehicle because, to go down the road of a charity or foundation, they say they were advised that this would not allow them to criticise the state or government. So, there you have outright admission that TPV’s intention is to do that AND, therefore, TPV is POLITICAL. Now, consider the stance of OFCOM and the fact that no politically based organisation is allowed a licence. You CANNOT be non political for one purpose of regulation and then political on the other hand. So, once more – sorry David and sorry OFCOM – but you are red handed and checkmated regarding this fundamental question. Lastly, TPV could have been set up as a Private Limited Company by guarantee. It wasn’t. It was set up by shares. We’ll touch on this point later.)
After taking advice we decided to incorporate Peoples Voice Broadcasting Limited as a private limited company. Principally because we did not wish to burden TPV with the increased regulatory cost and operational restrictions that apply to Charities and Community Interest Companies (CIC). (Again, the operational restrictions are those of being political and Icke has already stated this is why he chose the Private Limited Company vehicle. Again, therefore, this clashes 180 degrees with OFCOM’s rules yet OFCOM are determined to ignore every evidence of TPV’s political nature and Icke’s involvement)
However, transparency is important to us and we are happy to give the following undertakings: (It never was before so why now? People asking for transparency all through late last year were thrown off the David Icke forum, called a whole number of cheap names by TPV staff and crew including Icke and family and were determined by the TPV team as “trouble-makers. I guess now that TPV have decided to acquiesce – they have no choice if they wish to keep and build any sort of following – these people who were vilified, are now vindicated?)
1) That no shareholder of TPV will ever take a dividend from the company.
The Two Ways You Make Money holding shares
- An increase in share price. Over the long-term, this is the result of the market valuing the increased profits as a result of expansion in the business or share repurchases, which make each share represent greater ownership in the business as a percentage of total equity. In other words, if a business with a £10 share price grew 20% for 10 years through a combination of expansion and share repurchases, it should be nearly £620 per share within a decade as a result of these forces assuming the market maintains the same price-to-earning ratio. What you also have to bear in mind re TPV is that
a) Re the balance sheet – It will, in time (if all goes to Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee’s plan) have a very strong asset to debt ratio simply because it will have no debt except short term (running costs). Its asset side is wonderful because it bought all its assets without any debt whatsoever – from YOUR money (this is what I have meant by “money out of nothing” and Icke has his own central bank and “quantitative easing” – you can’t lose when you work with other people’s money. It’s exactly what our government does!). It has ZERO long term debt! No bank loans or any loans!
b) P&L (Profit & Loss statement) – Again, wonderful. TPV gets its income for nothing, gets its content free AND, regarding the online shop, think about it: YOU are funding the marketing to you of the t-shirts and the caps etc. These will then be sold to you and you will pay even more. So, the reality is that you may have donated say £50 and then bought a t-shirt for £15 (funding the station once more to the extent of the profit in that £15). Altogether then, you have spent £65 for a t-shirt worth, perhaps, a tenner. So the profits in the station are going to be significant when there are, again very little costs except overhead (and volunteers are cheap as was the equipment). Where are the losses to be made? Effectively nowhere (unless these people are seriously incompetent).
TPV’s Price to earning ratio with a balance sheet and P&L like that can only be good and increase exponentially over the years. And THAT is where the value to Icke and Tabatabai lies. Not in dividends!! Icke saying that a shareholder (of which there are only one or two and by what OFCOM says it can only be one) will not take dividends is PURE RED HERRING!
I’ve got news for you: BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY DOES NOT PROVIDE ITS SHAREHOLDERS WITH DIVIDENDS! Who’s Berkshire Hathaway? Warren Buffet!
2. Dividends. When earnings are paid out to you, these funds are now your property in that you can either use them to buy more stock or go to Vegas and receive a few blow jobs while finding Jesus and Elvis at the Golden Nugget!
Occasionally, during market bubbles, you may have the opportunity to make a profit by selling to someone for more than the company is worth. In the long-run, however, the investor’s returns are inextricably bound to the underlying profits generated by the operations of the businesses which he or she owns.
2) We will voluntarily (not voluntary at all. You screamed like a castrated cat before acquiescence) publish quarterly management accounts on our website, these will be reviewed by our external Chartered Accountants. Our next quarter-end will be 31st January and we aim to publish figures within two months of each quarter end. (Would those be the same accountants for David Icke Books Ltd and Lion’s Epoch Limited? While are these management accounts going to be of the quality and quantity of the little spreadsheet table you launched at us a few weeks ago which meant absolutely diddly squat to anyone while your audience showed its ignorance once again saying “That should shut people up!”. It shows you the level of intelligence a lot of your audience has David. Sad but true.)
3) As a small company we are only required to file abbreviated accounts at Companies House, however we voluntarily file full statutory accounts. (No biggie David. Every corrupt company on the planet files full statutory accounts and gets away with it. You’re swimming in the same sea Dave. You’re just trying to say you’re a dolphin rather than a shark!)
4) As a small company we are not required by law to have our accounts audited and this is helpful because it reduces our costs, an annual audit would cost in the region of £12,000 plus VAT. However, our statutory accounts will be prepared by our external Chartered Accountants and as such will carry an Accountant’s report in the standard ICAEW format. (No audit eh? Well, you see, it’s like this Dave. You could do whatever you wished and no-one would bat an eyelid at it IF you and your little chum Combataboy had dug into your own pockets with your total of £260K cash at the bank. But you didn’t. Suggesting accountant’s reports are your way of proving your “all above board” is like saying you come with a government guarantee (which, in fact, you do now I come to think about it). It’s like Richie saying no-one in the BBC or MTV would stoop to any malfeasance AND, considering what you yourself preach about the system in its entirety, you’re then using “Accountants” to suggest you’re all pukka? Geez a pie David! No, not P.I.E., just a mince pie will do!)
5) Our first statutory period-end is 31st October 2014 and then annually thereafter. We will publish our full statutory accounts on our website by 31st January each year, just four months after each year-end. This is much sooner than the statutory filing requirement of nine months following each year-end. (Whoopee bloody doo!)
6) We will voluntarily hold an annual “stakeholders” meeting, in London, within five months of our statutory period end, where we will be happy to answer questions from our sponsors, employees, volunteers and donors. We will ask a representative from our external Chartered Accountants to attend that meeting. We envisage that attendance at the meeting will be via a pre-booked ticket, sold at a small charge to cover costs, such as room hire. The precise format of the meeting will depend upon the number wanting to attend. (Note to volunteers and employees: Don’t even THINK of being a whistleblower! lol Have you noticed the sheer scale of people being banned from the David Icke Forum and anywhere else run by him and the “mob”?)
7) Our statutory accounts will voluntarily disclose details of any remuneration paid to any shareholder or director, or to any family member of a shareholder or director. (But you’re not a shareholder according to OFCOM David. Only Combataboy! Does he have a family? While, if there will ever only be ONE shareholder, i.e. him then why not just state “remuneration paid to Sean ADL Tabatabai as sole shareholder and Director”? or are there quiet interests for the moment Dave?)
8) Our statutory accounts will voluntarily include a note showing the number of employees and sub-contractors paid in £10,000 (annualised) bands. We will not be disclosing individual names as we consider that would be an invasion of personal privacy. (Agreed. It would be.)
Finally. Anyone notice anything? TPV and Icke are screaming from the rooftops that, if they don’t hit the £400K donations they need, TPV is going to go off air. Yet, here they are telling you that this is how they are going to proceed going forward. It fits with Richie Allen saying he didn’t believe they would go off air and die. Funny how on one hand you get told one thing and on another it’s all business as usual isn’t it? 😉
TPV: Place your bets!
Only 7 days to gogo so place your bets now:
TPV meets its £400K target – 10/1
TPV doesn’t meet £400K target – Can you get worse than “Evens”? I’ve never betted so I don’t know. Ignorant eh? 😉
TPV remains on air ongoing based on us now being told that there were sufficiently large donations coming in all the time since the telethon etc – 5/1
TPV goes off air for good – 5/1
TPV crosses the £100k mark – 2/1
TPV crosses the £200K mark – 7/1
TPV state they are staying on air because Icke and Tabatabai have invested their own companies’ total of about £260K at the bank or a portion thereof – 4/1 (if so, the reality of that – 100/1)
TPV stay on air because, all of a sudden, there are sponsors and advertisers coming in and/or they took a loan to get them over the hump – 10/1
I’m sure there are a myriad of other stories which they can think up of course.
Now, you may not believe this but I’m sort of sad that there is the possibility of such a potentially excellent vehicle for truth going off the air but I am. I’m just not sad that it would be David Icke’s and Sean Tabatabai’s et al. Why? Because its goal is not for that purpose. I only wish it had been.
Anyhow, place your bets or, if you can think of other little excuses for them, lay them on me! 🙂
Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum. I still wonder what that little boy has on the “great guru of truth”. Indeed there is a smell of fish on that bus you were on Sean. Emanating from you bud! Extremely fishy!
Pure guess on my part but I’d say illegitimate son (assuming nothing more sinister). Total assumption with no basis on my part though. However, in this day and age, I can’t see the need to keep something like that secret, so then possibly not. There’s something though, right?
David Icke: Geez a job!
I just intercepted (hacked) an email from a headhunter to David Icke. You see, I’ve become an “ethical hacker” since I applied for the job:
Dear David,
I am acting as headhunter on behalf of a medical charity who are searching for specialists in the area of solicitation. Your name has come up on a database of very successful opportunists in this area who seem capable of soliciting vast sums of money from people at the drop of a hat. Generally, we find it is prostitutes of one form or another, politicians and media people – such as actors and actresses – who particularly excel in this field and, it is with your recent fundraising extravaganza being brought to our attention, we decided to contact you for this wonderful, international role which may give you the opportunity of adding a few more countries to that list of yours which you say you’ve visited.
What we need from you, however, is a copy of your passport – as is the law in the UK today – to prove you are a British citizen. Granted you live on the isle of wight but, as I’m sure you’re aware, there have been a number of individuals on that island which are already known to the authorities and it is also a “soft landing” for illegal immigrants of one type or the other. Additionally, that business partner of yours has a strange name – Tabata what? I’m sure you understand we cannot be too careful in this age of terrorism David.
If you take a look at this position, you may appreciate that there are parallels with what you have done with TPV. Our client is TPP and also “not for profit” – well in a way, a sense or, at least that’s what we promote – you know the score on that David don’t you?
You’d be managing philanthropy donors David! These are high net worth individuals! We’re not talking about people with just a pot to piss in here David! You never know, you may even, as a side note, get them to invest in your TV network (but don’t tell us about it because we don’t appreciate “moonlighters” – you’d be working for us and if you got more donations for TPV than TPP we’d be seriously pissed as I’m sure you’ll understand?
As you can see, we call them “gifts”- yes, people really do just give away gifts of 6 and 7 figures (that’s £million to £tens of millions to you and me). David, imagine tapping into these people? One donation could run TPV for a year or more. Now WHY do you think that a philanthropist (aka: good guy who cares for the world) wouldn’t wish to donate to someone who is seriously trying to help the world and change it for the better? The only possible reason could be that he doesn’t wish to have the world changed for the better so what kind of real philanthropist is he/she? So then, if he/she doesn’t give their money to good causes which are REALLY good causes, then what are they donating to and what do they really expect from it? Nothing? No, don’t be so naive. They expect a return.
So David, what we would like you to do in the job is develop long term relationships with philanthropic individuals (David Rockefeller?), Foundations (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation?) and Corporations (Nestle, Coca Cola, Halliburton, Carlyle Group?) – you know them all David. We’ve read your books!
Skills and experience:
We like good actors David. We like emotional blackmailers who can tap into their target’s deepest fears, wants and needs. You’re PERFECT for that!
Ok you don’t have experience of solicitation at a 6 and 7 figure level so you’re a bit of an amateur in that department but we see your potential David. The arthritis helps too!
Are you committed to going above and beyond the remit of the role to achieve and exceed targets? What’s “above and beyond the remit”? Well, think about casting couches David. You know? Be ready to bend over, give oral, sleep with the CEO’s missus, that sort of thing. Do whatever it takes. You’re a “do whatever it takes man” aren’t you? After all, you signed up with OFCOM to get TPV launched so you did whatever it takes there didn’t you? You sold your soul down the river with that one! If Jimmy Saville had wanted a piece of ass, you would have bent over wouldn’t you? Wouldn’t you have? I’m pretty sure you would if he had offered the top “Grandstand” position at the BBC. I don’t know for sure though it’s just a hunch you know?
Intellectual curiosity to understand complex areas of research… etc. Now you’ve got that in spades haven’t you David? The curiosity that is, not the capability.
And the remuneration for this role would be between £45 and 50K David! You make us £millions and we pay you £50K. Sounds a good deal right? After all, it’s like you paying your volunteers sod all and yet you’re building (or trying to) a tv network which would end up with a share value of £millions. At least we’re paying you David. Peanuts, I admit but peanuts are better than a kick in the nuts aren’t they?
Ethical hacking eh? What’s next?
I guess Gary McKinnon was classed unethical.
Law = SHITE
Addendum:
It just occurred to me (don’t know why) but it could even turn out that you, David, got “bummed” by Jimmy Saville in his dressing room and that has still yet to come out.
But then, it seems the Icke family have a thing for sticking objects up their ass. Gareth, case in point: There’s an old adage – “Like father like son” so perhaps it isn’t all far from the truth?
But it may even come out that the straws were code for Jack Straw but since Jack’s still alive well, you know how it is!
Amazing what media whores will do for 15 minutes of fame eh? Plaster their arse all over the web showing another guy helping them to stick bundles of straws up their anus.
Now that you’ve covered Saturn David, what’s next? The rings around Uranus?
OFCOM FOLLOW UP
This is a follow up to the following blogs:
and
https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/david-icke-ofcom-reply-2/
Now, excuse me, but I despise being treated like an idiot. Particularly by people who are obviously mentally impaired and/or are evading issues put to them which may just be giving them a small headache. It’s kinda like a dog with a bone – some may call it tenacity (something you need a lot of in Business Development and Sales). I don’t like dropping the bone. If I had done that anytime previously within the legal issues I had, I would be “dead” by now. I don’t propose dropping it here either BUT, as you will clearly see, these people hide behind shit and feel safe and comfortable doing so because it is known as “the law”. This is about as far as I can take it myself (unless there were many others who wished to contact Kathleen and complain about the way she is handling these communications that is).
Excuse my french but : FUCK the law! It is a corrupt construct of legal persons/fiction which is screwing you, me and everyone on this planet and it is run by people who enjoy doing so and remain in their positions of enormous wealth (all corruptly attained while committing serious crimes on humanity) who then dictate to their little minions in so called positions of political power (who are then well taken care of for their services to the Crown, to the UN, to the Vatican, to the US establishment and to all other establishments which support this insane and inhuman network of law and money).
So, here is the up to date communications with one “Kathleen Stewart” – a mouthpiece (i.e she opens it and spouts whatever the system tells her to – in fact, a repeater in Icke’s language. A repeater which protects Icke – how FCUKING ironic is that?) for OFCOM and the Secretary of State and government which legislated OFCOM in the first place.
Please read from bottom up. If you wish to read the prior communications, you may find them on the blogposts above and, prior to them, there are others.
Kathleen,
From: Kathleen.Stewart@ofcom.org.uk
To: m@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: The People’s Voice
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:43:00 +0000
Dear Mr ……
In response to your email of 17 January 2014, I refer to the response to your Freedom of Information request, dated 21 November 2013, which gives details regarding the regulation of appeals for funds by television channels. Additionally I refer to my letter of 14 January 2014, which details the definition of general control of a channel.
As previously stated, the Licensee is obliged to comply with all the relevant licence conditions and will be responsible for putting in adequate compliance arrangements, including retaining recordings of programmes, and for ensuring that the service as broadcast complies with all the relevant Ofcom codes and requirements. If you have concerns about a specific programme shown, you can complain via the following link; http://consumers.ofcom.org.uk/tell-us/tv-and-radio/
:: Kathleen Stewart
Manager, Television Broadcast Licensing
Content, Standards, Licensing & Enforcement
Content, Consumer, and External Affairs Group
020 7783 4293
:: Ofcom
Riverside House
2a Southwark Bridge Road
London SE1 9HA
020 7981 3000
www.ofcom.org.uk
From: M [mailto:m@hotmail.com]
Sent: 17 January 2014 19:44
To: Kathleen Stewart
Subject: RE: The People’s Voice
Hi Kathleen,
Update:
Nothing to do with The People’s Voice? Has no control over it or its content? It is not political in nature yet his entire spiel here (just yesterday by the way) is all about HIS audience not being able to bring the British monarchy, government and all its corruption to heel if more don’t “pays your money”?
It’s a picture of an awfully upset man (who, by the way, received donations for TPV via his David Icke Books Ltd vehicle) regarding a venture that really only he fronts and continuously demands the public’s money for wouldn’t you say?
Ah! But I guess it’s not the “public’s money” but “private individuals’ money” right? After all, all our money is not public money unless it is siphoned through the government right? And we’re not “the public”, we’re private individuals right? So then, if that is so, and I am not “the public” (therefore I am not an individual who comprises “the public”) then why am I paying tax? Another thing, why do our politicians refer to “members of the public”? And our police and judiciary do the same. Who IS this “public” that, when an assumed member of it (i.e. me) suggests that because The People’s Voice is promoted as a voice of the people, it must be in the public interest to know exactly where their money is going and exactly how it is spent. But no, because TPV is a PRIVATE Limited Company, you and OFCOM allow it to promote itself misleadingly to the pub…. sorry to PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS… and then protect it from those private individuals’ scrutiny because, according to you (when it suits) we are not “The Public”.
It’s a little like Bilderberg and the government and parliamentary attendees of that “Private meeting”. They are invited to attend purely due to their public function and capabilities BUT, to attend without being held to account, they simply state they attend in a PRIVATE capacity. That’s them off the hook entirely.
Are you telling me you seriously do not understand this total fraud on YOU as well as me and everyone else? Just answer yes or no. That’ll do fine.
Regards,
M
To: m@hotmail.com
Subject: The People’s Voice
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:28:14 +0000
Please refer to the attached.
Remember, this woman gets paid a fairly handsome salary for this kind of evasive, wilfully evasive tripe!
And it’s entirely acceptable because the people who make the laws wish it to be. If you expose the tripe you become a form of “terrorist”. Why? Because you terrorise them by exposing them and having people appreciate just what a bunch of jacked up garbage they promote as law and “right”. If you make the law corrupt then you are breaking the law by being non corrupt. This is what people (or a lot of people) can’t seem to inject into their sub species craniums!
David Icke: HELP! HELP! The Reigstad’s on fire!!
Communists have a new name: “Mongs”, “Idiots”, “anti-Icke activists”, or simply jet people who might even watch TPV but don’t donate to it.
A quick aside Davey: How many people watch BBC but won’t pay their TV licence? You’d support that wouldn’t you? Ah but you can’t state that otherwise OFCOM and the establishment would attack you and TPV. Oh but, wait a minute, no they wouldn’t because you have absolutely nothing to do with TPV according to OFCOM! So yeah, you can say it. Ah but then, it wouldn’t be politically incorrect and could get you into trouble somehow. I bet you pay your BBC licence though eh Dave? Can’t miss Grandstand! Or can you stand to watch it considering they wouldn’t give you the prime slot on it but just gave you a table and a few coloured balls to whisper your comments about. I guess that’s the closest thing you’ve ever got to having balls Dave but, today, you’re just a bit “snookered” eh? How the hell do you continue TPV IF you don’t reach that magical figure, and continue to, without giving the game away that there are other backers? Hmmm… conundrum! Or will they undisclosed sums just keep coming in? There is no way you’re going to get anywhere near the sponsorship and advertising you were hoping for and you and the gang just haven’t go the foggiest of how to generate income from licensing do you? And you just wouldn’t listen would you? The potential is all there just waiting on you tapping into it but it’s just too difficult for you when you think you can just click your fingers and get money for nothing and the content for free.
Anyhow, back to the point: I love this post Davey. It puts me in tears of laughter…
Corporations? Hmmm…. isn’t TPV a Private corporation? I do believe it is! Now, in the land of Private corporations, as you well know Davey, they tend to create “scarcity” as well as use other tactics to win business and to stop “churn” or lose customers. If income isn’t coming in to the level required, they will do just about anything to find it. The thing is Davey, they tend, generally, to have various sources of income or, at least, they develop a market based upon the 80/20 rule if they possibly can. A company with only one customer relies on that customer 100% otherwise it goes out of business. That’s why most companies try to build that varied and substantial customer base (different income generating sources in effect). Whereas you have had a “business plan” (none at all actually – just a wish and belief and I’ve seen companies do precisely the same and it’s pathetic) that was “We’ll just keep asking the public for donations”. You’ve said it all along in your videos and even when I was there in TPV for that very short spell – the public’s donations will be the key (and yet it did not and does not have to be).
If anyone had asked you at the time last year: “What happens if they don’t donate enough Davey?” you would ignore them. But if you had given an answer, I wonder if it would have been “then I’ll get on Skype and, with sheer disdain, talk to my audience and tell them they are idiots and stupid/dumb, selfish, uncaring, will scream crying when the boots come to their door and every other fear tactic I can use to get the working class scum to donate”. No, I doubt you would have said you’d do that Davey but, strangely, it is exactly what you have done. “I’ll also have my son, Gareth, call a mass of people “mongs” and any other descriptive word to try and make them feel inferior (because that is what anyone is who doest do as the great one demands of them – this is evangelism 101). Man, I tip my hat to you once again because you certainly do realise and know what your audience is composed of because it’s working for you.
What else did you have planned if it didn’t work out donations wise? Ahh! the “IFF”: The Icke False Flag. Brilliant Davey, exceptional. How could ANYONE even consider that you, yourself would instigate such (something you have studied for the decades you have) when you point the finger at every other person or organisation who have used the strategy? No-one would possibly believe it would they Davey? They believe the “evil people” are attacking you and yet your entire station has not broadcast one iota of information which is not already out there in internet land via youtube, blogs or even mainstream. But the “evil empire” will attack “David Icke” while that same evil empire hands you and TPV a “licence to shill” on a plate. Aye Davey, you’re a real threat to the powers that be and your audience are only too happy to swallow that absolute shit! 🙂
You know what else the IFF does for you though? It allows you to cloak the fact that the incompetence in the entire organisation is outstanding while you all try to fix the myriad of failures and problems that you have.
While I’m sure there will be those volunteers in TPV who, while they would wish to give their all and do a good job doing whatever it is they are doing, Sean and Deanna etc will just not like them personally or think that they are hopeless or, perhaps, they may just feel they are not getting treated like “gods” by them, so they’ll want, at this point, to get rid of some people. That was always going to happen but there was no way your volunteers would have ever listened if one had told them that.
“Cognitive dissonance” is actually, ironically, what keeps you and TPV alive Davey. Your entire audience has it. Right down to them donating their money to you through BARCLAY’s BANK! It is bloody incredible what you get away with Davey. One can only stand in awe. Not at you but at the sheer incapacity of your audience. I can say whatever I wish about your audience or anyone. I’m not looking for them to donate money to me. But YOU. You’re an idiot, you really are. You just don’t recognise it due to your arrogance and narcissism.
There’s a guy by the “name” of Jonb on another forum, which I apologise but the name of the forum escapes me for now, who does great GIFs. I leave you with this one because it really does sum some things up so well.
David Icke: Dear god almighty!
So much absolute crap in all of this I wouldn’t know where to start.
I might get around to it at some point though. Just right at this minute, I’ve got better things to do and this guy’s crap is too much to take. Who’s going to play him in Hollywood’s “David Icke: Life and times of a charlatan”? – an autobiographical movie directed by George Lucas with masses of special effects otherwise it would bore you to tears! Because it’s gonna need one hell of an actor to beat what you see on these vids.
The elite will recognise that we’re not willing to DO anything but talk David? What the HELL is TPV? You slag off people for talking about it but DOING nothing? That is exactly what TPV is doing! TALKING! As for the action of getting off their arses and separating their arse from their sofa. That’s not what you want at all. You just want them to separate their money from their bank account (that’s the ONLY action you want) and then sit on their sofa watching TPV. You’re full of it man. Full of it and transparent as hell.
The elite will recognise we’re not willing to DO anything to resist? Yeah sure they will. The VERY MAN SAYING THIS didn’t even resist OFCOM! It just amazes me the shit you get away with emanating from that hole in your head mate!
“My health – I’m dying” – emotional blackmail
“If you don’t gimme your money then you don’t want (or deserve) freedom” – emotional blackmail
And you have the audacity to come across as if YOU are the only shepherd to lead the flock. Incredible arrogance man. You couldn’t lead a coup David! You couldn’t lead a coo oot of a shed!
While not one of your numbskulls noticed the massive contradiction between your statements and Richie Allen’s. You going on about TPV imminently going off air – IMMINENTLY mind! And what does Richie say right afterward? “I’m pretty certain that the People’s Voice will endure and we will survive and carry on….”
Yes Richie and so am I and always have been – look back at the blogs and you will see it stated. While I also mentioned (in text over a week ago) to a number of people, that TPV’s donations would start ramping up due to “anonymous” contributions coming in suddenly of significant amounts. Et voila! That’s precisely what is happening. 😉
Some people aren’t that stupid guys. We really aren’t. But then that’s what you hate isn’t it? To paraphrase George Carlin: “They want you ‘awake’ enough to see how you’re getting shafted but still dumb enough to not see how you’re getting shafted by others.”
Oh yes folks, TPV will endure. You can be certain of that and Davey Dyke can take it to the bank! But let me tell you this: Even IF they went off air for a while (or for good) it wouldn’t be because of a lack of funding even if you all stopped. What am I saying? They’re off the air nearly everyday anyhow with all that fantastic equipment they bought with your money.
By the way David, Ian Kelly wants to know where the £10K went which was paid to David Icke Books Ltd for TPV rather than sent through the Indiegogo site? Is THAT the money you don’t account for in the “financial report” you provided your followers (there’s no accounting showing ANY donations in that table Davey) and is it then the money you say you put into TPV “out of my own pocket”? I’d guess it probably is!
Jesus what a circus. What a joke. But there will always be those who want to pay for their enslavement thinking they are going to be given their freedom.
Just like the tray which is passed around in church and just like the televangelists offering you heaven. Some people just never learn.
Sad. Very very sad.
David Icke: OFCOM REPLY 2
Ok folks, i sincerely do hope this is my last post on the Icke saga. It’s all clear to see.
A good way of rounding it off is what I just received today.
I said previously, that the reason David gave up his Directorship in TPV – at precisely the same time that OFCOM contacted TPV to sort out the licence issue, was because David Icke would not be considered a “fit and proper person” (he could not possibly be) and that his entire writings were political in nature.
Further, I stated to OFCOM that TPV’s modus operandi was to attack the existing establishment (which, if you believe what you wish to believe of TPV – that it truly is attacking the existing establishment, then it is POLITICAL) but, as you can see, OFCOM have replied that they do not view TPV as political. This is obviously a “joke” and OFCOM know it. OFCOM also state that Icke is not in control. Puleeeze! How many of you believe that crap? While, all the Ickeans donated it BECAUSE it was “David Icke”. Imagine taking David Icke out of the equation last June and it was Sean Tabatabai and Deanna and, perhaps even Sonia and Ritchie, asking for £300K and giving you all those video updates, be honest with yourself, would you have donated, and if so, as much? Would they have reached that goal? While, remember, according to this new request for donations, it is STILL David Icke at the helm. Still he who is asking for the money and expecting it to be his name that creates that money (“out of thin air”). Don’t you think OFCOM know that? Don’t you think they see the Indiegogo site and who is at the helm? Don’t you think they see David Icke promoting the shows, promoting the presenters, PROMOTING HIS BOOKS AND HIS T-SHIRTS AND CAPS ETC?
So, you ask yourself (coz I’ve now said enough – if you don’t get it you don’t get it): WHY would OFCOM decide to ignore the absolute obvious? Because Icke withdrew his name from a piece of paper as a Director? DO YOU REALLY, SERIOUSLY BELIEVE THAT?
Good luck folks. As much as I can be terse (and I freely admit that) I am on your side and just don’t wish any of you to be duped. That has been my only goal in this. And contrary to what you have read from certain quarters regarding a communication I had with Sonia Poulton last year regarding a story I proposed for the Daily Mail, I can tell you 100% honestly: She took what I said entirely out of context and did so for a purpose. End. Period. Full stop. Purely your prerogative to believe me or not. I have nothing to gain and nothing to lose. I don’t know you and you don’t know me. Plus the ones who wrote it do not KNOW me either.
I wish you all well and I hope, somehow, we have better days ahead.
If you ever do visit the site again, please take the time to read the more important topics. I just felt compelled to give you a heads up on this subject and got “carried away” but there was so much to comment on. Perhaps there will be in future but I sincerely hope not. I don’t know about you but I’m sick and tired of it. While it is part “celebrity scandal” and, i suppose, provides a bit of “Coronation Street” for you, it is not the most important thing. It is just one small element of what we’re fighting. It will be one hell of a struggle and never be achieved unless we come together and concentrate on the real heavy issues and deal with them.
With that, ciao David. You may not provide transparency but you ARE transparent. It’s been fun. Be good now! (or am I hoping for too much?)
Earthling 
leave a comment