Earthlinggb's Blog

For Queen AND Country?

Posted in "Climate Change", Finance, Politics, The Corrupt SOB's by earthlinggb on April 22, 2012

The Armed Forces and the Police: They LOVE their Queen. They think when they take that oath for Queen and Country it is all wrapped into one. What FUCKING IGNORANT IDIOTS they are! While they do their duty their own families are getting SCREWED by the very woman and HER family they swear an oath to!

THAT IS THE HEIGHT OF DUMB-ASSED STUPIDITY but what’s even worse is: Even when it’s put in black and white under their noses – never mind by a blogger but later by a national newspaper (though the newspapers never paint the whole picture in one nice big gulp. They just feed it gently over months or years piece by piece – that way the big picture gets ignored by the ignorant!) – they STILL don’t get it!

So let’s look at today’s (21st April 2012) headline in the Daily Mail for starters shall we?

The real news (but just a snapshot of it) next to Cowell just to distract the attention. “Oh I don’t understand wind farms etc… sounds boring anyhow… so I’ll read the Simon Cowell segment”. GOD this fucking country is SO THICK and yet it then moans constantly about being screwed anally!

Now, a blog I wrote over a year ago:  The Crown: Profiting from your misery!

To all you STUPID “monarchists”: You bloody fools! Those parasitical scum are screwing you left right and centre while you celebrate a Diamond jubilee and wave your silly little flags as the Olympic team and English football teams sing their praises for her and her clan every time they win a fricking medal!

What is it you do not understand about the monarchy (who are MEANT to be ONLY a CONSTITUTIONAL monarchy – funny that when so many say we have no constitution!!) through their lovely little banking friends – the Crown Estate – OWN THE SEABED?

Now just before moving on, watch this little clip of the corrupt bastard you call your Prince:

What is it you do not understand about this?

UK PARLIAMENT ARCHIVES:

11 Feb 2003 : Column 245WH—continued

Seabed Management

Mr. Alistair Carmichael (Orkney and Shetland): I am delighted to have secured this opportunity to examine the workings of the Crown Estate Commission, which is one of the slightly gloomier corners of Government business. It is an area of public life that is not often overly troubled by the bright lights of public accountability, but it has a profound and real effect on the life of my constituents and many people who live in coastal and island communities throughout the United Kingdom. It was the subject of a considerable part of my maiden speech. …….

I would be delighted if the Minister were to say today that the Government will examine the question of ownership of the seabed. Such an initiative is long overdue. However, I realise that this is a Westminster Hall debate. I have been an MP long enough now to be realistic about what can be achieved. For that reason, I have asked that today’s debate be limited to the management of the seabed. Nevertheless, it never hurts to place on record my belief that it is fundamentally obnoxious that a body such as the Crown Estate Commission should exist and should exert power in the way that it does over coastal and island communities. I speak as one who represents several island communities and was born and raised in one.

It is questionable that we should allow such a body to raise money from things on which we depend, such as piers and marinas. We have no alternative but to use them, but rent is exigible by the Crown Estate Commission on them.

Now get this:

I turn to sub-sea cabling. The Minister may be aware that a project to lay a fibre optic cable between the Scottish mainland and Shetland is under consideration, although it is rather on the back burner. It would be in tune with an important Government policy on broadband to get that cable laid, and it might well be supported both financially and politically by the Scottish Executive, the Shetland Islands council charitable trust, the Shetland Islands council and the Orkney Islands council. However, if that is achieved, the Crown Estate Commission will charge no less than £64,000 a year in rent simply for the privilege of allowing that cable to lie on the seabed.

The same situation will transpire in the event that we are able to lay electricity cables to allow the export of electricity generated by tidal or wave power or wind power in the islands, which are uniquely well placed for the development of renewable energies.

UK Parliament – Crown Estate

SIXTY FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS RENT (PER YEAR!!) FOR A SINGLE CABLE DOING NOTHING/ZERO/NADA BUT SITTING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SEA ON THE SEABED!

NOW work out why there is so much emphasis on OFFSHORE WINDPOWER and work out why, while the feed in tariffs for those using solar power on their houses has been dropped so dramatically last year (41p/KW to 21p/KW) while wind energy AND PARTICULARLY OFFSHORE WIND, was not hit?

Do you get it? It is SIMPLE!! While it is possible for people to receive money back from the energy providers (the feed in tariffs) for supplying the grid, the CROWN DO NOT WANT THAT AND THEY CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT YOU TO HAVE THE REMOTEST POSSIBILITY OF BEING “OFF GRID” AND SELF SUFFICIENT!

What happens when the generation of the electricity is offshore? There is NO self sufficiency and it ensures that all of our (your) energy supply is provided by the grid and NOT YOU!

Now, since the dawn of North Sea Oil, the Crown Estate have owned that because they OWN THE SEABED AND THE MINERALS – see the blog which provides the link to the FACT that Petroleum vests with the Crown!! It does so for this simple reason – the Crown owns the seabed and minerals! Doing so, the Crown has been making 12.5% “royalties” (outside of the tax paid to government coffers) from the day oil was first struck in the north sea. 12.5% of the value of EVERY barrel of oil!

Now back to the wind power: Remember that £64,000 rent for a single cable between the scottish mainland and the Isle of Skye? Well think about this:

Charlie, invest in this, go around the world promoting the doom of the planet like the young David Rothschild. Also invest in Tamar energy (biomass) with me, Jacob and Evelyn and make speeches at the EU Parliament so they know who’s boss, and I assure you, you’ll be the richest King ever as you screw your subjects to the fucking wall mate. Just watch the energy prices rise! 🙂

Now consider this picture of a typical wind farm set up and all the requirements. THEN consider the number of turbines and then the number of cables between the turbines and the grid back onshore. Think about that number multiplied by at the very least £64,000 per year every year JUST FOR SITTING ON THE SEABED! Then wonder: WHO THE FUCK GAVE THE SEABED TO THE QUEEN AND THE CROWN ESTATE? THEN wonder once more about Tony Benn’s comments in Parliament regarding who or what the FUCK the Crown is in the first place? Put it all together and take a deep fricking breath!

Let’s just ask one of many questions of this Crown Estate: “How many turbines are anticipated and how much is the rental PER CABLE PER YEAR for them to sit on the seabed doing FUCK ALL?”

Then, perhaps, we can also ask them how much they are charging for the rent of every single turbine itself?

NOW can you get it through your skull as to why they don’t want you generating your own electricity? But they will “create jobs” for you to create THEIR energy generating plant so that they can get you to pay for it and pay for your energy that you are working for them to generate! YOU CREATE FOR THEM AND THEY PAY YOU PEANUTS BUT THEN THEY MAKE IT WORSE BY CHARGING YOU FOR THE ENERGY YOU HELPED CREATE FOR THEM TO CHARGE YOU! DON’T YOU GET IT YET?

Now let’s just take a quick look at ONE aspect more of this:

The Crown Estate acting as a co development partner. How nice. What the FUCK does the Crown Estate know about anything? Anything at all? Nevermind the engineering of offshore wind farms. While the cost of just the development and CONSENT (consent by whom? Ah you guessed it – THE CROWN ESTATE!) is just 4% of the total cost of a 500MW wind farm. But that 4% comes to £60M! NICE! 🙂

Read the whole thing:

Crown Estate – Guide to making a fortune and screwing the people of the UK by ensuring grid tied offshore wind farming. And charles and Co LOVE IT!

Now one last thing because you may read this and say “You said the Petroleum vests in the Crown and yet this says the Crown Estate doesn’t have control over the oil! So you’re wrong!!”

But listen: Even the UK bloody parliament doesn’t know who the Crown actually are! Read the blog: “Tony Benn, the straight man” – tony-benn-the-straight-man

THEN read once more: Petroleum vests with his majesty! The question then is “How many British Crowns are there?” Or is it that the Crown is something more than her majesty while she is the main focal point of it from the population’s ignorant perspective? Why, for instance, are there clauses in the Bank of England Act 1946 which are protected by the Official Secrets Act? Why is it that now, the Queen and her fucking family are being even more protected from scrutiny by this utter shit they call “law’?

Now here’s something else (how much do you actually need before that bloody penny drops you monarchical cretins?):

Charles: Richest King in history!

Osbourne licks Charles’ arse!

Republic warns of “historic stitch up” as Queen asks Parliament to allow royal funding changes

29th Jun 2011

Republic has described new plans to tie royal funding to Crown Estate revenue as an “historic stitch up” that could divert millions of pounds from public services.

The Queen today issued a “gracious message” asking Parliament to allow changes to royal funding which would see her paid a single annual grant based on a percentage of revenue from the Crown Estate. Proposals for the new “sovereign support grant” will be presented to MPs tomorrow and introduced in a new bill.

The royal household is currently funded through the Civil List and grants from several government departments.

Republic spokesperson Graham Smith said:

“The Crown Estate is not – and never has been – the personal property of the royals. The Windsors have no more right to its revenue than I do. To claim that it should fund their lavish lifestyle is deceitful and dishonest.”

“The Crown Estate is there to fund government and public services. If this deal goes through it will be a historic stitch up that will end up lining the royal family’s pockets.”

“We’ve seen that the royals are unable to keep their spending under control. The new grant is likely to lead to even greater waste with less accountability. It will give the royal household even more freedom over its finances at exactly the time when its expenditure should be more tightly controlled.”

“The office of the head of state should be funded like every other public body– through a budget agreed by Parliament and based on need.”

NOTES

Details of the funding changes are on the HM Treasury website: leg_sovereign_grant.htm.

The Crown Estate is a land and property portfolio, managed on behalf of the Government, whose surplus revenue is paid annually to the Treasury. It is the ‘hereditary possessions of the Sovereign’, not the personal possessions of the individual acting as Sovereign.

New report reveals annual cost of British monarchy ‘enough to feed an army’

23rd Jun 2011

The annual cost of the monarchy has been found to be more than the entire annual MoD food budget and the equivalent of thousands of nurses, police officers and teachers, according to a new report.

The new report by campaign group Republic has revealed that the total annual cost of the British monarchy could be over £200 million, more than five times the official figure released by Buckingham Palace.

The report describes the monarchy as ‘one of the most expensive, wasteful and financially irresponsible institutions in the world’.

The estimated cost presented in “The ‘Value for Money Monarchy’ Myth” includes security expenditure, costs of royal visits and lost revenue from the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, all of which are excluded from official figures.

The key findings include:

* The estimated total annual cost of the monarchy to taxpayers is £202.4m, around five times the official figure published by the royal household (£38.3m last year).

* The official figure excludes a number of costs, including round-the-clock security, lavish royal visits and lost revenue from the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall.

* Civil List expenditure has increased by 94 per cent in real terms over the last two decades.

* £202.4m is equivalent to 9,560 nurses, 8,200 police officers and more than the total annual Ministry of Defence spending on food. The total cost is also equivalent to a number of high profile government cuts, including cuts to the Sure Start programme.

* The British monarchy is 112 times as expensive as the Irish president and more than twice as expensive as the French semi-presidential system.

* Britain’s royal family is the most expensive in Europe at more than double the cost of the Dutch monarchy.

* Taxpayers are kept in the dark about the exact cost of the monarchy, due to the royal household’s exemption from the Freedom of Information Act and widespread misunderstanding about the nature of the royal family’s finances.

Republic will be holding a protest outside the gates of Buckingham Palace on Saturday June 25 at 1pm to raise awareness of the cost of the monarchy. The protest will go ahead despite the decision by the royal parks agency to withhold formal permission.

Republic’s campaign manager Graham Smith said:

‘This report cuts through the spin and shows beyond doubt that the British monarchy is a colossal waste of public money. The royals have shown that they are simply incapable of reining in their spending – they will continue to waste taxpayers money until the government stands up to them.’

‘In pointing out the scale of waste here we’re calling for an immediate start to opening up royal accounts. It’s time for the government to take control of the monarchy’s budget, pay the Queen a salary and make the royal household fully accountable to taxpayers.’

‘Every year we go through the charade of Palace press officers telling us what great value the monarchy is. It’s time for the royals and politicians to come clean – spending hundreds of millions of pounds on one family is morally indefensible, especially at a time of painful cuts.’

NOTES

For further information or comment contact Graham Smith on 07747 608 770 or graham@republic.org.uk

The report is available to download from http://www.republic.org.uk/royalfinances

The protest will go ahead outside the gates of Buckingham Palace at 1pm on Saturday June 25.

Visitors have been mesmerised by the quality that pervades every aspect – thanks to the demanding eye of a man who, in every aspect of his life, operates at the highest level.

The Rothschilds have always been well connected – Lord Rothschild’s son, Nat, has been the subject of media speculation after entertaining George Osborne and Peter Mandelson on the oligarch Oleg Deripaska’s yacht – but this family does not court publicity, preferring to operate through a network of connections behind the scenes. Indeed, Lord Rothschild rarely gives interviews, even about a subject as close to his heart as Waddesdon.

The purpose is to provide an archive and a conference centre, holding meetings on “subjects of interest to mankind, such as climate change, the environment, the Middle East, investment. Ten years ago I held a conference with Warren Buffet and people were queuing to come. I intend to do more of those, perhaps with the Saïd Business School at Oxford.

Lord Rothschild: My manor from heaven.

Now, it is significantly, the very last paragraph of this which is of immense interest and very telling. You see, the conference old Jacob refers to which he held 10 years ago is that conference at Waddesdon Manor which Arnold Schwarzenegger attended shortly before running for Governor of California. Furthermore, even more telling is the transcript of that meeting which was reported in the Times shortly thereafter. It was this:

Read it ( They knew! ) and recognise that these bastards not only knew what was coming but they planned it years before while the British Government (yes, even the UK chancellor, Alistair Darling, suggested he did not see the financial crash coming until 2007/2008. If not, then he was never obviously, “in the know”. You see, the Labour party (the left wing of the bird) pumped the bubble up (Tony and Gordon knew exactly what they had to do) and the right wing of the same bird (you see they are both run by the same people at the top) then imposes the austerity while there is no need for a national debt in the first place! See previous blogs on this proving it!

And lastly, Charlie linking up with the Rothschilds to invest in the very scam they preach is necessary to “SAVE THE WORLD”.

Charles’ Rothschild links and the screwing of a nation.

I mean, my apologies to those of you who still can’t quite grasp this but you must be as thick as dog shit not to understand what is and has been going on here for a very long time!

There was a reason I rewrote this song. Tongue in cheek yes but absolutely true nevertheless:

National Geographic:  Who owns the moon? Could Richard Branson?

You may think this is crazy but just you watch!

Advertisements

The Girl who could not commit a crime!

Posted in Law, Uncategorized by earthlinggb on April 3, 2012

THE LAW DOES NOT RECOGNISE HER AS EXISTING BECAUSE SHE HAS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE. THE LAW THEN EXCUSES ITSELF FOR NOT ALLOWING HER TO HAVE A PASSPORT, ID OR ANYTHING WHICH ALLOWS HER TO PLAY THE GAME OF LIFE (MONOPOLY). THEY, THEREFORE, STATE ALL THE REASONS WHY NOT BEING REGISTERED IS A DANGEROUS THING. HOWEVER, FOR EVERY YANG THERE IS A YING. THE STATE, THE U.N., THE LEGAL WORLD AND THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT ADVISE ANYONE, OF COURSE, THAT IF YOU ARE NOT RECOGNISED BY LAW AS EXISTING THEN YOU CANNOT BE “SEEN” TO BREAK THE LAW. THE STATE AND THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT CANNOT, THEREFORE, HOLD YOU TO OBEYING LEGISLATION SUCH AS PAYING TAX AND BAILING OUT THEIR CORRUPT BANKER BOSSES. YOU DO NOT EXIST!!
THIS IS HOW THE POLICE STATE IS BEING BUILT. YOU ARE A “PERSON” IN LAW. THIS GIRL WAS NOT!! BUT THE STATE DO NOT WANT YOU TO UNDERSTAND THE YING – HOW THEY CONTROL YOU AND OPPRESS YOU!

PLEASE WILL YOU UNDERSTAND THIS VERY SIMPLE LOGIC WHICH THE POLICE STATE, THE LAW SOCIETY AND THE STATE/GOVERNMENT/U.N. DO NOT WISH YOU TO RECOGNISE. YET IT IS IN FRONT OF YOUR VERY OWN NOSE!

27 March 2012 Last updated at 12:52

Jade Jacobs-Brooks’ 20-year birth certificate battle

Jade Jacobs-BrooksJade Jacobs-Brooks was 20 before she got a birth certificate

Getting a birth certificate is something most people take for granted.

For Jade Jacobs-Brooks and her parents, it was a mammoth task that resulted in a relentless battle spanning two decades.

Miss Jacobs-Brooks, 20, from Harlow, Essex, was born in Alicante, in Spain, in September 1991.

But she had no paperwork to prove it because of a bureaucratic mix-up between British and Spanish authorities.

It meant she was unable to get a passport, vote or move out of the family home.

Even nights out with her friends were difficult because she had no identification to prove her age.

“It’s been incredibly frustrating,” she said.

“When I turned 18, everyone was going to bars and clubs but I couldn’t go because I didn’t have any identification.

“For me, it was more upsetting than anything.”

The saga began following Miss Jacobs-Brooks’ birth when her parents, Linda Jacobs and Victor Brooks, contacted officials in Spain.

“Start Quote

If she had been a prisoner in a Spanish jail she would have probably got more help.” OF COURSE! AND AGAIN, THAT POINTS TO THE ENTIRE CON – YOU SEE, SHE DID NOT EXIST IN THE EYES OF THE LAW THEREFORE, ANYTHING HARMING HER WAS HARMING A NON EXISTENT PERSON (PERSON!!). OF COURSE, IF SHE WAS NON EXISTENT THEN, IT IS OBVIOUS, JUST AS SHE COULD NOT BE SEEN BY A COURT TO BE HARMED AND THE COURTS COULD NOT/WOULD NOT PROTECT HER OR THE STATE BESTOW ANY OF THEIR “PERSONS RIGHTS” UPON HER, SHE COULD, LOGICALLY, ALSO NOT BE SEEN TO HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME BECAUSE NON EXISTENT PERSONS/ENTITIES CANNOT TAKE ANY ACTION CAN THEY? BUT, HAD SHE COMMITTED A CRIME YOU CAN BE 100% SURE THAT THE STATE WOULD HAVE HER PROCESSED TOUTE SUITE! 

SO THE MORAL IS: IF YOU DO NOT EXIST ACCORDING TO THE LAW THEN YOU CANNOT COMMIT A CRIME – HOWEVER, IF YOU DO COMMIT A CRIME, YOU CAN BE SURE THE STATE WILL PROCESS YOU AND, AFTER YOUR TERM IN JAIL, VOILA! YOU SHALL HAVE YOUR PASSPORT AND YOU SHALL EXIST!

JUST COMMIT A CRIME! 😉 

Andrew DennySolicitor

Everything appeared to have been signed off correctly and the couple received a temporary passport for their daughter.

They were told the birth could then be registered in the UK.

But after returning home, British officials said the documents were invalid.

The family contacted the Veya Baja Hospital, near Alicante, to ask for the official birth certificate.

But they were told there were no records relating to Jade.

“It turned into a complete nightmare,” said Mr Brooks, 55, who works as a porter.

“We contacted the hospital and they couldn’t help us. The British officials couldn’t help.

“We had nowhere to turn.”

‘Wits’ end’Every avenue taken by Mr Brooks and Ms Jacobs resulted in a dead end.

Numerous letters were sent out appealing for help, with the government, MPs and even the Queen contacted.

Mr Brooks flew back to Alicante in attempt to resolve the issue when his daughter was a toddler.

“We tried everything but were at our wits’ end,” said Mr Brooks.

“People said they might be able to help but no-one ever got back to us. It got to the point where I thought this would never be resolved.”

In 2008, the situation came to a head when Miss Jacobs-Brooks was 16. She got a job at a supermarket but was told she would not be able to start work unless she could prove her identity. “PROVE YOU EXIST!” What about “I’m standing right in front of you therefore I exist”?

The document Jade's parents were given in SpainThe birth document issued in Spain was invalid

Her story was published in a local newspaper and it was then that Allen and Overy, a major law firm, got involved.

Solicitor Andrew Denny, a partner at the firm, started to investigate the case.

“I just couldn’t understand why the British Government didn’t step in and work with the Spanish Government,” he said.

“She was left to sort out a case that no private individual would have had a chance of doing. I don’t think I’d have been able to solve without the help of our Madrid office.

“It’s not just a case of speaking the language, it’s working out the Spanish system.”

Miss Jacobs-Brooks had been placed in an almost impossible situation, Mr Denny said.

‘Human rights affected’Her life was on hold until she could get a birth certificate. NO “HUMAN RIGHTS”. ARE YOU SAYING A BABY JUST BORN HAS NO RIGHTS? THINK HARD ABOUT THIS! “HUMAN RIGHTS” is a misnomer! THEY ARE TALKING “LEGAL PERSON’S RIGHTS”. This is obvious now because until she is recognised as existing as a person then they are saying she has no rights!!

“Everything we take for granted, Jade was not able to do,” said Mr Denny.

“The right to be able to work, to move freely and travel – she was being denied all that. It was impacting on her human rights.

“If she had been a prisoner in a Spanish jail she would have probably got more help.”

The firm agreed to take on her case free of charge. If it had been private client, the legal bill would have run into tens of thousands of pounds. OK, THEY TOOK IT ON FREE OF CHARGE. GOOD BECAUSE THEY ARE ADDING ANOTHER SLAVE TO THE SYSTEM AND SHALL MAKE FROM HER LATER. SHE’S AN ASSET SO WHY WOULD THEY CHARGE YOU? NEVERTHELESS, THEY MADE MONEY SOMEWHERE IN THE SYSTEM (PROBABLY PAID BY THE TAXPAYER – ALL THE OTHER SLAVES).

Following the intervention of lawyers, the hospital in Spain was finally able to locate a document relating to Miss Jacobs-Brooks’ birth.

Jade Jacobs-Brooks as a babyJade Jacobs-Brooks was flown back to the UK days after being born in Spain

After three years’ of investigation, the lawyers had found enough information to process an application for a birth certificate.

“I’m not 100% sure what went wrong at the Spanish end,” said Mr Denny.

“We may never know.”

For Miss Jacobs-Brooks and her family, the news was a huge relief. A RELIEF BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT AWARE OF HOW THIS IS A CONTROL GRID MECHANISM!

“We would never have been able to afford pay the legal fees to get this resolved,” Mr Brooks said.

“Without the legal help, I don’t think we would have ever got anywhere with this. OF COURSE NOT! IT IS THE LEGAL ESTABLISHMENT WHO WANT YOU TO BE IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM AFTER ALL! OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO “HELP” YOU! WHILE MAKING A BUCK OUT OF YOU AT THE SAME TIME!

“But we shouldn’t have been put in that position in the first place.”

Now in possession of the birth certificate, a whole host of new opportunities have opened up for Miss Jacobs-Brooks.

She has ambitions to work in the City of London having completed a course in business administration.

“I just want to get on with my life now,” she said. YOU HAVE A LIFE! WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO HAVE IS A CONTROLLED ONE. THE “NEW OPPORTUNITIES” WHICH HAVE OPENED UP ARE ALL CONTROLLED BY THE STATE. THINK OF WHY YOU CAN EXIST YET NOT EXIST AT THE SAME TIME! HAS ANYTHING CHANGED ABOUT YOU SINCE YOU WERE GIVEN A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? NO! IT IS THE STATE THAT STOPS YOU FROM HAVING A FULL LIFE WITHOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. IT IS YOUR GAME PIECE ON THE GAME OF MONOPOLY THEY ARE FORCING YOU TO PLAY!

COMPANIES CANNOT EMPLOY YOU BECAUSE COMPANIES MUST ENSURE (CONTROLLED BY THE STATE AND THE SAME LAW) THAT YOU PAY NATIONAL INSURANCE AND INCOME TAX. A COMPANY DOESN’T CARE IF YOU PAY THESE THINGS BUT THE STATE CONTROLS THE COMPANY AND IF THEY EMPLOY YOU WITHOUT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND THEREFORE YOU ARE NOT “SEEN” BY LAW (THEREFORE YOU CANNOT BE HELD TO STATUTE) THE STATE WILL DESTROY THE COMPANY! THE COMPANY IS AS MUCH CONTROLLED AND HAMSTRUNG BY THE STATE AS ANYONE. THIS IS BECAUSE THE BANKS (CENTRAL BANKS, IMF ETC ETC AND THE CROWN) WISH TO ENSURE ALL THAT MONEY KEEPS FLOWING UPWARDS! AND……A COMPANY IS A?………………….PERSON! 😉 

NOW PLEASE READ THIS:  THE MATRIX
AND THIS: The “NATURAL PERSON” and THE MATRIX
THIS: U.N. INADVERTENTLY CONFIRMS “FREEMAN” CONCEPT
AND THIS: DESTROYING THE MINDGAME!