In answer to a dutchman on the plight of Palestinians….
Many years back, I wrote multiple, in-depth, blogs regarding the law and Human Rights and what a farce it all is. But again, as I have moaned about on multiple occasions, the majority “tuned in” for more gossip on David Icke and “The People’s Voice” than they did for any of the real, important blogs.
Anyhow, I watch this dutchman make his point and so many ‘talking heads’ in Corporate AND Alternative media make points but never seem to try and understand any of the underlying issues which result in the points they make. I can say the same for the recent Covid joke and the underlying securitisation which had the effect of shutting down any and all dissent while I see, time and again, all those faces on your TV and youtube debating it all to this day and yet they refuse (or have no idea) to look into the detail which holds all the answers.
So, here we have the dutchman wondering why we don’t know the names of the Palestinians and how this philosophy in the media and government circles comes about while we know all the names of “those who matter”- The Israeli dead.
My blog in 2011 (almost exactly 12 years ago to the day):
This Digest examines the situation of children who are denied a fundamental human right and who, in legal terms, do not exist”.
UNCF Innocent Digest No.9 March 2002: birthregistration_Digestenglish.pdf
So there you have it in the UN’s own PLAIN language: In LEGAL TERMS they don’t exist. IF then, in legal terms, they do not exist then, by definition, the legal world can have NO AUTHORITY over them. They are EXPLICITLY saying this. There is no room for misinterpretation. It is precise. The UN and legal world spell out the ADVANTAGES of having a birth certificate (all the benefits) but not the DISADVANTAGES which they trust you will not even begin to consider.
“The value of birth registration continues to be overlooked, according
to the report. It says that registration is a critical measure to
secure the recognition of every person before the law, to safeguard
the protection of his or her individual rights, and to ensure that
any violation of these rights does not go unnoticed.”
Child-rights@hrea.org: msg00069.html
“Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child. This paper emphasizes that, while a person’s name may be their most distinctive “mark” of individuality, additional information – such as age, family ties and nationality – promote the child’s right to legal protection by parents and by the state.”
“every child is entitled to State protection against exploitation and abuse. In the case of the unregistered child, however, he or she has no guaranteed protection of a specific national jurisdiction.”
“Birth registration is a permanent and official record of a child’s existence. It can be generally defined as the official recording of the birth of a child by some administrative level of the state and coordinated by a particular branch of government. Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child.“
“Ideally, birth registration is part of an effective civil registration system that acknowledges the existence of a person before the law, establishes his or her family ties and tracks the major events of that individual’s life, from birth, to marriage and parenting, to death. A fully functional civil registration system should be compulsory, universal, permanent and compulsory.”
“A birth certificate is the most visible evidence of a government’s legal recognition of the existence of a child as a member of society.”
“In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, for example, Palestinians have been motivated to register their children in order to establish legal identity. On the basis of this registration, identity cards are issued which designate whether the child was born in Gaza, the West Bank or Jerusalem. This in turn establishes categories of the population subject to controlled mobility, leading to stigmatized treatment and additional discriminations.”
“….without a birth certificate it is difficult for an unregistered child, or that child’s family, to seek legal redress.”
The Blog: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2011/10/22/u-n-inadvertently-confirms-freeman-concept/
Now, if Israel say there are only 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza (for example)when there are, in fact, 2.2 million, let’s say, while so many Palestinians have no birth certificates (the very thing I state is used for control – which it is) then, if Israel bomb 700,000 Palestinians but those Palestinians “didn’t exist”, then there is, in law, no crime committed.
“Rights groups warn that Israel’s control over the population registry has likely lowered the registered Palestinian population in the West Bank and Gaza by hundreds of thousands of people. Over the years, Israel has also imposed various restrictions on the registry of Palestinian children, according to a 2006 report by Israeli NGOs B’Tselem and HaMoked.”
See here: https://www.972mag.com/palestinian-newborns-unrecognized/
Now, also, consider this philosophy:
And Netanyahu tries to label Hamas “the new Nazis” while, all along, in their Talmudic teachings by their esteemed rabbis, the ‘Nazi beliefs’ in a “Supreme Race” is simply a projection by these people, swapping “Supreme Race” for “God’s Chosen Ones”.
The desperation of these two to have the world population accept their ‘spin’ and propaganda is palpable. They need popular acceptance to allow Israel to ethnically cleanse Palestine.
We’re dealing with murderous psychopaths and don’t think for one moment that they’re not murdering you and yours at the same time. Various ways: “Covid” vaccinations; Increasing energy bills; increasing food bills; Soon, complete control over food and water supply; “climate change”weather events; “Wild”fires. There will be many more ways to come.
Clear as day for anyone with an operating cranium!
Israel & Palestine
In 2011, I wrote this: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2011/11/26/israel-the-contrarian-agenda/. While it was written during a time or heightened tensions with Iran and the tensions calmed, the “contrarian” agenda I speak of, I still stand by.
I am in no doubt that this Hamas attack on Israel is a false flag either by Israel itself or planned and funded by the globalists within Israel. So very easy to have planted Israeli or globalist/Israeli assets in Gaza/Palestine and have the Palestinians attack. It is still a false flag. There is no way that the Palestinians could have achieved this without Israel or globalist knowledge.
My blog back in 2011, however, presents what I determine as sound reasoning for my contrarian view.
America is being destroyed from within as we speak. Its power and its democracy has served its purpose. Globalists have no nationality in their hearts (if they had hearts) and I suggest that, just as America has served its purpose, so has Israel.
Could be wrong – Don’t think so.
US and Europe lead world condemnation. That is the governments of such nations. Can you think of any time where your government has SAID one thing and planned and executed the exact opposite? Of course, the governments and people of the west have been propagandised toward to support Israel every since its founding as a nation (even after that founding being achieved after a jewish terror campaign culminating in the bombing of the King David hotel – The British mandate government HQ) however, once the globalists start to steer these captured governments toward a more anti Israel stance, you can bet they’ll follow. It’s that simple. Lock step Covid. Lock step Israel.
They do what they’re told!
Secret Army/Police
The following video freaked me out. Why? Because, yesterday evening, I was sitting out on my terrace having a smoke and the thought entered my head: What if all this illegal immigration is not just about the ageing of the west and adding foreigners of working age to the population for the sake of those ageing demographics but also/or to introduce non british all across the country, ready to act?
Act as what? Well, what if a significant proportion of British Police/Army are unwilling to turn on their own people? What if the situation gets so bad that the population simply have had enough and revolt in one form or another? The powers that be need a Plan B in that case. They, most certainly, will have considered all of this.
It just so happens that all of these immigrants (or the vast majority) have been working (fighting) aged men. I have written very little in recent times because, frankly, I’m exhausted by it all and it makes zero difference, however, that does not mean I am not thinking almost every single day. I just happened to think of this last night.
Then, a matter of minutes ago, I watch this video. It freaked me out because this guy, Richard, somehow, must have thought the same thing today? Yesterday? I’m a nearly 20 year “veteran” of this and Richard, here, has just started considering it all over the last few months or, perhaps, since Covid – I don’t know. The point being: If he’s thinking it and I’ve thought it, how is it (or is it?) nobody else has? I highly doubt that. I also highly doubt some of our politicians and others in “authority” have not had it cross their mind. Then again, they’re so up their own arses, perhaps they haven’t.
Club of Rome, Apollo, Climate & Covid: 1969 – 2020 and beyond
I’ve just found the ‘Holy Grail’ seed of the Sustainability/Climate Change/Club of Rome/MIT/UN Agenda 2030 fraud and from where your present circumstances started.
British TV presented it to you in 1973.
Here’s your answer folks. It was on your TVs.
Spread this everywhere and to everyone you can.
(Notice how NASA comes into frame straight away with the Apollo missions showing us how limited we were. I am 90% convinced that was the real purpose of a fake moon mission in addition to tax theft). They needed no further debate regarding how ‘delicate’ Earth was and Apollo gave them that to a generation who believed it. I believed it but I was just a kid with a vivid imagination, no physics degree at the time and no worldly experience. In addition, we didn’t see what we can see now of “Apollo” to recognise the fake it was.
I put together a 3 hour video in October 2020 (originally posted to Youtube) trying to piece together the full picture (or as full a picture I had at the time) of what Covid was all about. At the beginning, I go into the connection between Apollo and Environmentalism (Club of Rome was formed in 1968, Apollo 11, 1969, Prince Charles first Environmental speech, 1968, Limits to Growth published 1972 – same year as last Apollo mission). It then connects Environment to Climate, population and Covid.
I hope you take the full 4 hours of time it takes to watch and absorb all of this. Perhaps a little at a time?
I’d love your comments on it all once you have.
Malcolm Roberts & Earthling’s “Money Physics”
For those who don’t get it yet: If YOU own nothing and everything is ‘access based’ (meaning you pay for access to anything and everything) then government are those who provide that access. If private ownership is abolished (which it will be) then THEY own everything, you own nothing and there is NO DEMOCRACY. You cannot have freedom and democracy when you must pay to access all your needs from a centralized, omnipotent government!
This is why I wrote the blog: “Money Physics and the transference of power” in 2013. It describes precisely why money is just a tool for them.
An excerpt:
What happens when that slope becomes a vertical line?
No more work is being done and ALL power has been transferred.
As that slope increases and the time (years) narrow to months and weeks and days as the M2 circulation goes spiralling upward, what happens is that, eventually (theoretically but also in reality except for the fact they manage it) you are left with ALL power transferred – no “kinetic”energy left and it is all transferred to “potential” energy in the hands of a very very small few. And THAT is the goal for these people. Once they have all power absorbed by them, they no longer need money because they OWN every last resource which they have captured through governments coming good on their promissory obligations (Government bonds) to them. There is no activity left in the private economy from which to derive the payment of the debt because ALL resources (human and capital) have been absorbed by the central banking private owners.
Precisely what Malcolm Roberts is now describing here….
Read the full blogpost here: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/12/09/money-physics-the-transference-of-power/
Pictures in the mind
Psychology 101 for Climate action…
It’s that simple when people don’t have a clue that there is a nefarious purpose behind it all.
Meanwhile, if you can figure the following out, you’re a genius because I can’t:
The academics who apply their behavioural psychology to this government propaganda (and just about every university and state education apparatus is involved in this) are citizens. Similarly, the Police who do the job or oppressing you, on behalf of the state, are citizens.
In the above, I block, in red, the relevant paragraph to point out these citizens (making decent salaries but nothing to write home about) are presenting strategies to the government in how to ‘nudge’ the public (comprised of citizens) to behave in the manner the government wishes. These academic citizens then suggest that the social contract demands that the government lead by example but, as you all know (and as these academic citizens know), the government never does this but, what the government do do is apply policy which negatively impacts upon the citizens (but doesn’t negatively impact those in government).
A case in point:
So these academic citizens (as well as the Police, who are citizens) enable the government to oppress and thieve from them and their families. These academic citizens pay tax, heat their homes, cook, shower, wash, vacuum and buy food, fill their cars – in fact everything that you and I do – and every single policy and regulation. the government introduces, impacts them in a similar way as it impacts you and I.
So my problem in understanding these people is this:
Actually no, it’s not a problem in understanding them (which I don’t) but simply that the outcome, after great consideration of their actions, is that these academics are complete and utter morons. I’m not being flippant nor hyperbolic. I am being 100% honest.
No matter their philosophical ideologies about ‘saving the planet” etc. (even if they truly believe that is the intention and, if so, they are clearly, immensely naive and downright stupid and can’t seem to recognise simple, obvious deception) they tend to speak about (being lefties) “down with the rich” etc (as Barry Buzan does in the video I posted in an earlier blogpost entitled “Barry the bullshitter”) and think this sustainability bandwagon will destroy the rich when, as clear as spring morning after a raging thunderstorm, their salaries and their universities’ donations to their research are being paid by those very same people (the rich) and the entire ethos which they are subscribing to, is also being fed to them and through them by these self same rich.
So my belief that they are abject morons is a sound one, supported by absolute, unarguable logic. They are willing to be paid to build a prison for the citizenry, of which, they are one as are their own families and loved ones. They are willing to be “house negroes” in the hope their ‘massas’ will throw them scraps. However, their massas despise these academic citizens as much (if not more) as all the rest of us citizens. I say “if not more” because the masters can very readily see that the academics and police are willing to sell out their brothers and sisters for those scraps.
This goes for the MET office guy, the TV News reporter, the RAF/Army/Navy guy and so many others who play ball. Imbeciles: Every last one of them because they have not (or are incapable of) extrapolating from their actions, their own future.
Idiocy, to a degree I’d never have believed just a decade or so ago.
If you can figure out how educated individuals can be so stupid, as I say, you’re a genius! Because I sure as hell can’t!
Phil Jones & Climategate: Down the memory hole
It was just over a decade ago now but very few remember it and it is rarely, if ever, mentioned….
Unfortunately, many of the links below will probably take you nowhere now. However, the article is in tact and represented here for posterity.
Climategate Professor Phil Jones could face ten years on fraud charges
JANUARY 28, 2010 · 80 COMMENTS
contributed by John O’Sullivan
Yesterday the London Times broke the latest news on the fate of disgraced British climatologist Phil Jones, of the University of East Anglia (UEA). Jones breached the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by refusing to comply with requests for data concerning claims by its scientists that man-made emissions were causing global warming. The Times reports that the UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) decided that the UEA failed in its duties under the Act but said that it could not prosecute those involved because the complaint was made too late.
What the Times and the rest of the media are overlooking is that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), not the ICO, is responsible for announcing the results of the police investigation into the Climategate scandal. The ICO is merely a non-departmental public body which reports directly to Parliament, sponsored by the Ministry of Justice and deals solely with data protection, FOIA regulations, privacy, electronic communications regulations and environmental regulations.
What is not being intelligently reported is that Jones is still liable as lead conspirator in the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and may face prosecution under the United Kingdom Fraud Act (2006). If convicted of the offense of fraud by either false representation, failing to disclose information or fraud by abuse of his position, he stands liable to a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment.
In this article I shall demonstrate that the fuss over the FOIA infringement, although in itself succeeding in achieving no conviction, does demonstrate that the ICO has acted improperly and may have prejudiced the outcome of any prosecution Jones may face for far more serious offenses for false representation (section 2) and failing to disclose information (section 3) under the Fraud Act (2006).
I strongly urge interested readers to study the article shown here, written by Norman Baird, for a fuller explanation of the scope of the Fraud Act (2006) and the implications in the Professor Jones scandal.
Although the offense of fraud may be committed in three ways, we shall only need to apply two in finding reasonable grounds to bring a prosecution in this case. All three forms of the offense require proof of dishonesty and an intention (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. “Gain” and “loss” are limited to gains or losses in terms of money or other property.
The forms of fraud directly relating to Phil Jones are:
Fraud by false representation (section 2)
Fraud by failing to disclose information (section 3)
The CRU Email Evidence
From a full examination of excerpts from leaked CRU emails cited below, it is readily demonstrable that the police and Crown Prosecution Service currently possess sufficient evidence to charge Phil Jones under both sections 2 & 3 of the Fraud Act (2006). I shall cite liberally from Jones’ own email admissions, in conjunction with also citing liberally the much-acclaimed analysis of all the leaked UEA emails by Australian physicist, John Costella. Dr. Costella’s excellent study is available here.
I have used my own judgment to assess which of Jones’ emails are the most damning. Bear in mind that a defendant incriminates himself by any admission he may make.
On January 16, 2004, in leaked CRU email 1074277559 exchange Jones frantically urges Penn State University climatologist, Michael Mann, to delete data:
Subject: Climatic Change needs your advice—YOUR EYES ONLY !!!!!
Mike,
This is for YOUR EYES ONLY. Delete after reading—please! I’m trying to redress the balance. One reply from Christian Pfister said you should make all available!! Pot calling the kettle black—Christian doesn’t make his methods available. … I told Steve separately, and told him to get more advice from a few others, as well as Kluwer (publishers), and the legal department.
PLEASE DELETE—just for you, not even for Ray Bradley and Malcolm Hughes.
Dr. John Costella’s commentary on the above is, “Jones’s blind panic—in private to Mann—speaks volumes. He is so scared of the ramifications that he even asks that Mann destroy the email immediately. Are these the actions of scientists with nothing to hide?”
In the leaked emails of February 4, 2004, email 1076083097 exchange, we read that a large number of climate con collaborators are discussing ways to avoid providing independent Canadian climate analyst, Steve McIntyre, with enough of the computer programs to actually check their results. Linda Mearns, Senior Scientist at the Institute for the Study of Society and Environment at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, writes:
My point about the computer programs is still that “providing the programs” can be interpreted a lot of ways. I have thought about this, and imagined if in one of my larger and more complex projects, I was asked to provide all the programs. I could do that just by sending the pieces with a summary file explaining what each piece was used for. It still theoretically allows someone to see how the programming was done. And I do think that is a far sight easier than providing stuff that can be run, etc. I am suggesting that one could do the minimum. Then the point is, one isn’t faced with garish headlines about “refusal to provide programs”. I think it is harder to come up with a garish headline about “refusal to provide completely documented programs with appropriate instructions files and hand-holding for running it.
Mearns’ argument is effectively this: if we are forced to provide the computer programs, then let’s break them up into the smallest possible pieces, so that McIntyre can see roughly what we have done, but would have an almost impossible task putting the pieces back together again so that it could be used—sort of a “Humpty Dumpty.”
Phil Jones realizes that this won’t fool many: if they had done the science properly, then the computer programs and supporting documentation would be readily available for anyone to use, without any further work.
Jones then replies:
So now it seems that we’re separating “providing the programs” from “running the programs.”
I can’t see the purpose of one without the other. Even if Mike Mann complies, I suspect there will need to be several sessions of interaction to explain how to run the programs, which neither side will be very keen on.
Jones is savvy enough to understand that providing un-runnable programs will lead to an immediate request or demand for assistance in actually getting them to run.
Jones then admits that, even with possession of the programs and the data, a lot of “fiddling” is needed to get to their claimed results:
As I said before, I know that running the programs will involve lots of combinations (for different time periods with different temperature proxies).
Jones further realizes that validating their programs would require validating their mathematical “number-crunching” programs—often shared between different programs, and hence called “library routines”:
Also I would expect, knowing the nature of the mathematical approach that we use, that there will be library routines. We don’t want McIntyre (and McKitrick) to come out and say that he can’t get it to work after a few days.
Jones continues:
So, it is far from simple. I’m still against the computer programs being given out. Mike has made the data available. That is all they should need. The method of calculations is detailed in the original paper … and also in several other papers Mike has written. In other words, the skeptics have a description of what was done which should be enough.
Then this bombshell:
As an aside, Mike Mann is now using a different method from the paper of Mann, Bradley, and Hughes of 1998.
So even if McIntyre and colleagues follow the method described in the 1998 paper, they still won’t obtain agreement with what Mann is now doing! Could there be any clearer argument for providing the exact computer programs and methodology used for each and every published paper? Jones apparently can’t fathom the ridiculousness of his own words.
He continues:
It might appear that they want the programs to check whether their version works properly. If this is the case, then there are issues of Intellectual Property Rights. So, if they get the programs, how do we stop them using it for anything other than this review?
God forbid that any other scientists should be given assistance in researching this issue of critical importance to humanity! Jones’s treatment of their data and research as “private property”, for them to exploit and profit from—to the exclusion of all other scientists—is obnoxious and unlawful, particularly as it is paid for by taxpayers and subject to full FOIA disclosure!
Phil Jones replies to an email from another climatologist, Van Ommen, on February 9, 2004 in email 1076336623 exchange copying in Mike Mann:
Thanks for the email. Steve McIntyre hasn’t contacted me directly about the Antarctic data (yet), nor about any of the data used in the 1998 Holocene paper or the 2003 Geophysical Research Letters one with Mike. I suspect (hope) that he won’t. I had some emails with him a few years ago when he wanted to get all the station temperature data we use here in Climatic Research Unit. At that time, I hid behind the fact that some of the data had been received from individuals and not directly from Met(eorological) Services through the Global Tele-communications Service (GTS) or through the Global Climate Observing System.
We here start to learn about the tricks that Jones and colleagues have used to thwart attempts to get access to the dodgy data that their published claims are based on. In this case, Jones is trying to argue that data provided by individuals does not need to be provided for independent scrutiny—another intent to conceal fraud.
Jones continues:
Emails have also been sent to some other paleoclimatology people asking for data sets used in 1998 or 2003. Keith Briffa here got a request, for example. Here, they have also been in contact with some of Keith’s Russian contacts. All seem to relate to trying to get data that we’ve used. In the Russian case, issues relate to the Russian (Rashit Hantemirov) having a paper out with the same data that Keith used ….The data are different for two reasons. One reason is that Keith used (a mathematical method on the data); and, secondly, Rashit has added some data since Keith got the data a couple of years ago.
Jones is here giving yet more reasons why the original data should be made available. So what will he do?
I’ll just sit tight here and do nothing. Mike will likely do the same, but we’ll expect another publication in the nearish future.
This is clearly the guilty mind legal component, or ‘mens rea’ – intent to cover the fraud by ‘sitting tight’ – refusing to comply with FOIA disclosure – and implies Jones conspired to do so with Michael Mann.
So not only will they ignore all requests for the data—and hide behind dubious loopholes to do so—but they are moreover planning to continue publishing papers based on all this “private” (fraudulent) data, adjusted by their own private mathematical methods!
On January 21, 2005 Jones corresponds again in email 1106338806 exchange.
Phil Jones is confident that it won’t be a problem in continuing to decline FOIA requests:
On the Freedom Of Information Act, there is a little leaflet we have all been sent. It doesn’t really clarify what we might have to do regarding programs or data. Like all things in Britain, we will only find out when the first person or organization asks. I wouldn’t tell anybody about the Freedom Of Information Act in Britain. I don’t think the University of East Anglia really knows what’s involved.
However, he also starts the process of finding loopholes in the legislation with fellow climate scientist conspirator, Tom Wigley:
As you’re no longer an employee, I would use this argument if anything comes along.
Tom Wigley replies:
Thanks for the quick reply. The leaflet appeared so general, but it was prepared by the University of East Anglia so they may have simplified things. From their wording, computer programs would be covered by the Freedom Of Information Act. My concern was if Sarah is/was still employed by the University of East Anglia. I guess she could claim that she had only written one tenth of the programs, and therefore only release every tenth line of the programs.
Another interesting attempt to conspire to fraudulently wrangle a loophole, albeit unlikely to succeed. Phil Jones replies, refining the loophole even further:
As for the Freedom Of Information Act, Sarah isn’t technically employed by the University of East Anglia and she will likely be paid by Manchester Metropolitan University.
Not that she wouldn’t be covered by the Act: merely that she would be paid by a different University!
Jones continues:
I wouldn’t worry about the computer programs. If the Freedom Of Information Act does ever get used by anyone, there is also Intellectual Property Rights to consider as well. Data is covered by all the agreements we sign with people, so I will be hiding behind them. I’ll be passing any requests onto the person at the University of East Anglia who has been given a post to deal with them.
On February 2, 2005 in email 1107454306 exchange Phil Jones writes to Mike Mann:
Just sent loads of … data to Scott Rutherford. Make sure he documents everything better this time!
So it isn’t until 2005 that they decide it is time to document what they are doing?
And don’t leave stuff lying around on anonymous download sites—you never know who is trawling them. McIntyre and McKitrick have been after the Climatic Research Unit … data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the United Kingdom, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send it to anyone.
Bingo! Proof of intention (mens rea) to commit a criminal destruction of evidence–all we need now is proof of the destruction/loss of data the (actus reus) to have the two requisite components of a crime ( the guilty state of mind and the actual commission of the crime).
Jones then discusses (conspires) to find other way to unlawfully subvert the FOIA law:
We also have a Data Protection Act, which I will hide behind.
Again, “hide behind” reveals intent to conceal the original fraud of falsification of climate data.
Tom Wigley has sent me a worried email when he heard about it—he thought people could ask him for his computer programs. He has retired officially from the University of East Anglia so he can hide behind that….Intellectual Property Rights should be relevant here, but I can see me getting into an argument with someone at the University of East Anglia who’ll say we must adhere to the Freedom of Information Act!
Again, proof Jones will “argue” against compliance betraying his guilty frame of mind, in seeking to pervert the law — further deepening his admissions to commit a crime.
On February 21, 2005 in email 1109021312 exchange Phil Jones writes to colleagues, Mike Mann, Ray Badley, and Malcolm Hughes, regarding news reports that Mann will be forced to release his data:
The skeptics seem to be building up a head of steam here! …
Leave it to you to delete as appropriate! ….PS I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the Climatic Research Unit … temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the United Kingdom has a Freedom of Information Act!
Again, we have Jones admitting to coercion of others to join him in and conspire to conceal the legal duty he has as CRU leader and hide his climate data fraud.
On July 5, 2005 Jones makes further damning admissions in email 1120593115 exchange where Phil Jones sends an article and a blog entry to climate scientist John Christy:
This quote is from an Australian at the Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, Melbourne (not Neville Nicholls). It began from the attached article. What an idiot. The scientific community would come down on me in no uncertain terms if I said the world had cooled from 1998. OK, it has, but it is only 7 years of data and it isn’t statistically significant.
Again, Jones’s ability to concisely summarize the key facets of this climate temperature fraud is remarkable. While Jones is admitting to the truth in private, he has CRU making public statements that are knowingly fraudulent under the terms of the Fraud Act. Can you imagine how intimidated the more junior scientists would be?
On August 4, 2005 email 1123163394 exchange Jones now makes a remarkable comment, about something that is elementary to even high-school science experiments:
There is an issue coming up in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Every graph needs uncertainty bars, and having them is all that matters. It seems irrelevant whether they are right or how they are used.
In other words, he is only concerned that they give the appearance of estimating the uncertainties in their predictions, rather than actually getting those (subtle and difficult) vital calculations right –- an obvious deceitful act and thus a further offence under the UK Fraud Act — fraud by false representation (Section 2)
On January 5, 2007, the email 1168022320 exchange from Phil Jones to many:
I’ve added a few extra names in the cc of this email list to see if we can definitively determine where Figure 7.1c from the 1990 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report comes from. The background is that the skeptics keep referring back to it and I’d like to prove that it is a schematic and it isn’t based on real data, but on presumed knowledge at some point around the late 1980s.
Wonderful! Fake graphs presented in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report—but only disclose that once the skeptics take note of it? More fraud by false representation (see: Fraud Act, Section 2).
Ascertaining Phil Jones’ Guilt
The UK Crown Prosecution Service may fairly construe in their case that Professor Jones et al. continued in their concealment (the act of the offense) throughout the course of those FOIA applications. Thus, this constitutes an offense of continuous unlawful conduct that would, in turn constitute what is known in English criminal law as a “compound allegation.”
The continuing act will continue for as long as the defendant sets about the business of committing or covering up the crime. Jones was covering up his criminal acts right up to November 19, 2009. His concealing of his crimes until that date keeps all such offenses “live” because the act of covering up the crime is, itself, a crime.
The Fraud Act (2006)
The Fraud Act (2006) tells us we must ask the following questions to ascertain the measure of the defendant’s guilt:
“whether a defendant’s behaviour would be regarded as dishonest by the ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people. If answered positively, the second question is whether the defendant was aware that his conduct was dishonest and would be regarded as dishonest by reasonable and honest people.”
Subsection (1)(b) requires that the person must make the representation with the intention of making a gain or causing loss or risk of loss to another. The gain or loss does not actually have to take place. The same requirement applies to conduct criminalised by sections 3 and 4.
Subsection (2) defines the meaning of “false” in this context and subsection (3) defines the meaning of “representation”. A representation is defined as false if it is untrue or misleading and the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
Subsection (4) provides that a representation may be express or implied. It can be stated in words or communicated by conduct. There is no limitation on the way in which the representation must be expressed. So it could be written or spoken or posted on a website.
Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information
Section 3 makes it an offence to commit fraud by failing to disclose information to another person where there is a legal duty to disclose the information. A legal duty to disclose information may include duties under oral contracts as well as written contracts. The concept of “legal duty” is explained in the Law Commission’s Report on Fraud, which said at paragraphs 7.28 and 7.29:
Section 7: Making or supplying articles for use in frauds
Section 7 makes it an offence to make, adapt, supply or offer to supply any article knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud, or intending it to be used to commit or facilitate fraud. [e.g. a computer model designed to falsely represent warming global temperatures]. Subsection (2) provides that the maximum custodial sentence for this offense is 10 years.
Section 8: “Article”
Section 8 extends the meaning of “article” for the purposes of sections 6 and 7 and certain other connected provisions so as to include any program or data held in electronic form.
For a full and detailed explanation of every facet of the Fraud Act (2006) visit this Crown Prosecution website page.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we may determine that Professor Jones’ conduct may be found by a Crown prosecutor to be sufficient to obtain a conviction against him for obtaining services dishonestly (government climate research grant funds) and of possessing, making and supplying articles for use in frauds (climate data, graphs, computer models).
The Fraud Act creates serious offenses of dishonesty and the statute of limitations is six years. Unless the factors against prosecution outweigh those in favour, a prosecution will normally take place. The offense is triable either way and carries maximum 10-year sentence or a fine (or both) on indictment.
John O’Sullivan is a legal advocate and writer who for several years has litigated in government corruption and conspiracy cases in both the US and Britain. Visit his website. He offers his services free to the site and is not a site employee. Any opinions he expresses are his own and do not necessarily represent those of the site owner.
Bill’s genocide equation
(For some unknown reason, I screwed up the original numbers on this post. Now corrected. The odd thing is, nobody corrected me)
So, considering the previous post, Bill wants to solve the CO2 equation.
CO2 = P x S x E x C
which means solving for P (population)…
P = CO2/SEC
Now, let’s take some arbitrary numbers….
Let’s say CO2 is 10000, S is 10, E is 5 and C is 1. It makes no difference what the actual numbers are since this is about showing the trend of what this equation does.
So we have: P = 10000/(10x5x1) which equals 200 (population).
Reducing the services per person(S) – i.e. the consumption of gas, electricity, fuel and food – to 2 results in the following…
P = 10000/(10x2x1) which equals 500 (population)
So, reducing services equals an increase in population if the aggregate CO2 level remains constant? That is what your equation states, Bill!
“Ah! But in reducing services, therefore consumption, we will reduce CO2 from 10000 to some (indeterminate) number” says Bill.
So, the very day we reduce our consumption to zero is the very day excess CO2 will disappear? Is that what you’re saying Bill? Ok, let’s do it. Let’s switch everything off for a full day and see what happens. You see, your equation also suggests that, if aggregate CO2 tends to zero and reaches it, then zero divided by any number is zero, so zero population. If CO2 remains at 10000 and we get SEC to zero, then we have infinite population? This equation is actually senseless, isn’t it Bill? You present it to an audience who just don’t question Bill Gates yet, I have just proven, it’s meaningless and doesn’t add up. It’s a simpleton’s arithmetic equation which appears, on first glance, to make sense until you derive for the other factors such as P.
Even if you suggest what you actually mean is the incremental change in aggregate CO2 will equal the incremental change of population and the other factors, it still results in the same fallacies.
So, to maintain population at present levels and solve the climate crisis would take what Bill? We hear “innovate to zero” all the time. Zero what? Oh yes, CO2 you suggest! Plus, you say, one of these factors needs to get to, effectively, zero. Well, if it’s services (S) then both, energy per service (E) and CO2 per unit of energy (C), will also be zero. No energy is needed for no services and, if no energy, then no CO2, right?
If it’s E or C that are zero, then S will be too. In fact, any of these factors becoming zero will result in the other two being zero! What happens in the equation when all consumption is zero? Well, assuming your bullshit is true that aggregate CO2 will also, miraculously, drop to zero (in an instant because, if not in an instant then people die)…
P = 0/0 which leaves a population of? Zero!
So your equation doesn’t amount to shit and doesn’t work at all, does it, Bill? You’re a twat, Bill but nobody has challenged you on this. They dare not. It’s like the story of the Emperor’s new clothes.
Or does it?
How do you intervene to get CO2 to zero? Well, you’ve just stated that services and energy need to drop – drastically. But who wants to stop consuming (the very little we do in comparison to people like you)?
So how do you get that energy usage down? Well, you increase prices to such dizzying extents that those who cannot afford it will stop consuming. Stop eating and/or stop heating (or cooling) themselves. What does that lead to Bill? Sure, a reduction in energy consumption, but something else too:
Ah yes! Non military genocide.
Such a simple equation as you say, Bill.
We all need to pay our bills, Bill, don’t we?
And our ‘dues’.
People just have no clue the war being raged against them because they see no guns and tanks and they do not understand it is a class war where Bill’s class want less of our class. If and when (which won’t happen) people realised the war, Bill would be a dead man walking as so many of his class would.
You believe in Darwin don’t you Bill? Survival of the fittest? Isn’t it strange that all you politicians and billionaires are such weeds? I guess you’re just lucky that the fittest are so thick!
The Quickening
Energy and food bills.
We’re all sitting back watching genocide as it happens. And it will happen to you, in time.
It’s all captured in Bill’s simple equation: People and energy/consumption. So they increase the cost your energy bills and your food until it is no longer sustainable for you.
Looking ahead, I see myself as having nothing left. So, it will be ‘goodbye’.
For all the millions who didn’t listen: Fuck you! Your time will come. And it’s coming quicker every single day! The “Quickening”.
So many warnings/alerts over so many years by so many people yet, you sniggered at the “Conspiracy Theorists”.
It was never hidden. It’s just that when people like me (who have read more related documents, books, archives) than that vast majority who snigger (who’ve read nothing, essentially and don’t care to) try and enlighten that majority, there is the inevitable dismissiveness because either, they worship their ‘gods’ and cannot fathom the reality of them or, they will look at who is saying these things and think “What the hell would you know?”.
But it’s not just the billionaires, it’s our own monarchy and, as you can read (I hope) above, our own Prime Minister. What the FUCK is it you don’t understand?
Philip wanted a virus: He got it just before copping it. He died a happy man!
His son picked up the baton way back in 1970 while his father was promoting the Club of Rome and WWF….
And now his son has taken up the baton….
“None of them say they’re going to kill people, though! That’s ridiculous! And there’s no connection being made between their words and the energy and food bills skyrocketing today! So you’re just making this shit up!”.
Dear God Almighty! Are you so mentally impotent to think these people. are going. to come out and state what their “interventions” are? Are you that naive?
“Covid” was a Climate intervention!!
That is why Deutsche Bank produced the following ‘heads up’ in January of 2020:
However, they have now totally wiped this article from the net. Even if you search for it using the internet archive. However, go to Muck Rack and you will see it was an actual article but even if you do and click on it, you will be taken nowhere.
However, when you click on ‘Karmaimpact’ you are taken to another Muck Rack page which then, on the right, has a link to “Karmaimpact.com” but that then takes you to a page named “Timeless Media” which then has the following near the bottom of the page:
We are dealing with genocidal maniacs and until you recognise this, en masse, you’re just going to end up another statistic at some point.
Yes, indeed, I wish I was joking or just wanting to scare you for some purpose. In actual fact, I do want to scare you for a purpose: That purpose is to get you to WAKE THE FUCK UP and protect us all from a neomalthusian group of maniacs who think they own the world which, at this point in time, they do!
If you don’t, you WILL die! Only a matter of how and when and, if not you, your lineage. However, even. if you don’t die, your life will be miserable and so will the lives of those you proclaim to love.
Gordon Brown: This is how long it’s all been in the making.
And I can assure you, even longer than this. It starts, in earnest, in the creation of the Club of Rome in 1968.
Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/QjvqoXoUtPwE/
This is Brown now. Just so you can judge how long ago the above video was. The above was not long after he was PM (if it wasn’t even before or during).
So the bastard knew (as all of them did from Blair – and probably well before him – to the present incumbent and the next). And people think the Prime Minister runs this country! Hilarious!
But no matter what, people just don’t give a shit.
Ah well. I gave up a long time ago…… on everything. Due to the realisation people just don’t give a shit.
Enjoy your future plebs!
Oh we’re doomed I tell ya! We’re gonna fry!
The 1540 ‘megadrought’ heatwave that saw vicars beg God for rain and soldiers guard water fountains
The hot weather in 2022 has a long way to go before it challenges the summer of 1540, which saw people collapsing in fields from the heat
Environment Correspondent
July 13, 2022 5:05 pm(Updated July 15, 2022 2:12 pm)
People across the UK and Europe are sweltering under a blazing heatwave that scientists are warning could be the start of a record-breaking summer of high temperatures.
The latest weather predictions are worrying, but at least in modern times there are scientists to make sense of the forecasts. For people in 1540, the year of the hottest summer ever recorded, it would have seemed like the apocalypse had arrived.
By November 1539, residents in southern Italy and Spain knew something was wrong. It was winter, but no rain had arrived. Winter in Italy was dry and warm, “like July”, according to one record from the time.
A few months later, people in Northern Europe also began to panic. Week after week, month after month, no rain fell.
It was to be the start of the worst drought in European history. Throughout Europe, from the UK to Poland, eleven months passed with hardly any rain and blistering temperatures.
Trees shed their leaves in the height of summer, grapes withered on the vine, the river Rhine in Germany shrank to 10 per cent of its normal volume.
Vicars begged for rain during Sunday sermons, soldiers were deployed to guard water fountains, and villagers in France hid in their cellars to escape the daytime heat.
Catholics and Protestants accused each other of arson as wildfires swept through villages. There were kidnappings and reprisal killings, and villagers barricaded themselves into their homes in fear of the violence. Dysentry from contaminated water killed thousands of people, and farm labourers collapsed while working in the fields.
Worst of all was the food shortages, said Dr Oliver Wetter, a research associate at the University of Bern.
“There was not enough water in most of the rivers, so people couldn’t grind their grain anymore,” he told i. “Grain and bread prices rose, and poorer people couldn’t afford the basic food.”
It is tricky for scientists to establish exactly how high temperatures climbed in 1540, because they are relying on diary accounts of rainfall and heat levels rather than recordings from thermometers, which hadn’t been invented.
What they can say is that temperatures that year were five or six degrees above the seasonal median average, Dr Wetter explained. To put that into context, the next hottest summer in 2003 saw temperatures three degrees above the median. It was “unbelievable”, Dr Wetter said. “That is really, really, really warm.”
Dr Wetter believes the freak weather of 1540 was caused by a collapse in the jet stream, causing hot, dry weather to hang stubbornly over the continent, blocking cooler Atlantic weather systems from passing. There was about a one in one thousand likelihood of such an event occurring in a pre-Industrial world.
But climate change means we have to be prepared for this to happen more frequently, Dr Wetter told i, pointing to studies suggesting that the jet stream stalled in the summers of 2003, 2015, and 2018, bringing extreme weather including heatwaves and droughts to Europe.
This week, scientists warned that Europe, including the UK, could be in for a summer as hot as 2003, with Met Office meteorologist telling i the region could be facing a “historic, even unprecedented” season of heat.
Dr Wetter, a climate scientist, believes it is only a matter of time before an apocalyptic summer like that of 1540 is upon us. Research suggests such a summer in modern society that would bring widespread and lengthy blackouts, severe water shortages, and the mass death of animals.
“To my opinion, we haven’t seen anything quite as bad as 1540 yet,” Dr Wetter said. “But we are clearly going in this direction. Unfortunately I am quite convinced that we will see similar things in the near future.”
Original article: https://inews.co.uk/news/1540-megadrought-heatwave-beg-for-rain-1739942
And today, after a few days heat in the UK (here in the borders of Scotland, we have around mid/late 20s) people are going nuts about the heat. Of course, what has made them do so? The media and the UK government proclaiming a national emergency (the first of its kind) while the criteria for declaring such was, coincidently, just introduced in July last year. Oh what a wicked web we weave!
People on twitter (including MPs like Nadia Whittome) would be wearing sandwich boards declaring “The end is nigh” if this were some decades ago before twitter or the internet.
Anyhow, back to the article: Did we have an industrial revolution in 1540? No, I don’t think we did. Did Henry VIII declare a climate emergency? No, I don’t think he did. A 1000/1 chance in a pre industrial world – but it happened.
This is 2022 and Madeleine is trying to suggest we could see 1540 again. However, what’s more concerning is that our governments, in league with the WEF and UN, are going to use this as justification for all manners of shortages.
It’s a war alright, it’s just not a climate war but a class war. Unless you wake up to that fact and we start organising, you’re as good as dead.
There is a far greater chance of this being anthropogenic geoengineering than actual anthropogenic climate change.
From the moment ‘Covid’ hit, I knew they were going to ‘turn up the heat’ big time. Few listened and few are still listening. It beats me how few people are saying “How the hell is all of this happening at once?” and that they still can’t put 2 and 2 together.
Target women to depopulate the planet
Just think Ladies. All this “empowerment” you’re being bestowed by men (because there were no women in power until men gave you it remember) has nothing to do with these men having an interest in your equality. It’s all just to ensure you have less offspring and, therefore, depopulate the planet of humans.
The gender diversity being for the same purpose.
But hey! I know you’ll never accept that.
Not too bright ladies. Not too bright at all.
You’ll all be concubines in the 22nd century!
“Life is good” as long as we have a little less of it!
Mainstream (but “just a discussion point, not an agenda”) say the plebs
Ok plebs. Learn the hard way! You’ve been offered all the info you’ve needed for years and years and dismissed it and will continue to. (I’m talking to the ignorant plebs here. If that isn’t you then it doesn’t apply).
Lions with earache are being given faster and better treatment by Doctors than you are! Do you think Simba, here, has medical cover? Was it vaccinated just to be sure?
People are so fucking ignorant, gullible and naive they won’t think of the endangered old guy next door.
No medical cover but it didn’t cost Simba a cent!
Watch this space. I’ll get banned for hate speech toward Lions next!
Monkeypox: Here we go again?… and again?…
You may remember my post called “Bill’s Securitisation conference” … https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2022/02/20/bills-securitisation-conference/
Well, in 2021, they held the Munich Security conference also and I believe it must be an annual event.
Bill had his people there too, in 2021.
Get one message to people and get them to understand this: Until they grasp what is going on and why it is going on, this globalist, elitist fear-mongering (and perhaps REAL pathogen release) is never going to end until they have reached their goal.
The energy bills will continue to increase.
The food prices will continue to increase.
The removal of your rights to own a non electric car.
The petrol/diesel price hikes will continue.
The ‘pathogens’ will continue.
The reduction in air travel will continue.
The price of beef and other meat will continue.
You are in a literal war and you don’t even know it or who your enemy is. You don’t know what they want and what they are trying to achieve. You will bleat and moan but you will never face your demon (your enemy). You will never acknowledge it exists and, therefore, your life will continue to be a nightmare and get worse and, for most of the population, once you die or your kids or existing grandkids die, there will be no more of your lineage. But then that just may not concern you BUT you are, selfishly, ambivalent to the world, the authoritarianism and the SOMA pills you will leave them to.
So, as we had prior to Covid with “Event 201”, we had this prior to Monkeypox (in case you didn’t know):
And here are screenshots from the exercise document itself:
Sources: https://www.nti.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/NTI_Paper_BIO-TTX_Final.pdf https://nypost.com/2022/05/28/monkeypox-simulation-in-2021-predicted-current-outbreak/
Apologies for the lack of commentary and further narration and detail in analysing this but I’ve been doing this for over a decade and I’m tired now.
If the world’s population wishes to be fucked up the arse continuously, then who am I to spoil their dreams?
Earthling 
2 comments