Earthlinggb's Blog

Here’s a thing….. “Diversity”

Posted in Politics by earthlinggb on April 20, 2015

I’ve just set up a company and we’ve got contracts totalling £10M supplying technology to certain Enterprise sectors. The problem is, I need a CEO since I do not wish to be embroiled in the everyday running of the company. Our growth projections over the next 5 years are showing a conservative estimate of around 100% per annum.

Now, the trouble is, I’m worried about the possibility of a new Labour government coming in on the 7th May because I might be in a position where I have to find my new CEO from just 0.01%, or less, of the population. It appears that this is the approximate percentage of Black, secular jewish, homosexuals with dreadlocks and who subscribe to the rastafarian movement in this country. As you can see, this might cause me a slight issue if Labour win the election because they are determined to ensure that the UK’s population split of all sorts of particular types of people is reflected in the number of CEOs. Where the hell I might find a black, secular jewish, homosexual, dreadlocked rastafarian, who’s got the right credentials in our technology space and has run a company before, is anyone’s guess.

But then that doesn’t seem to be an issue for labour. ANY Black, secular jewish, homosexual, dreadlocked rastafarian will do. As long as we have that relative percentage of CEOs reflecting the population, everything is hunky dory it seems.

So, if you happen to be walking down Camden High Street and spot one, would you do me a favour and ask him if he wants a job as a CEO at a salary of £150K a year and £1M of stock options? Thanks.

YOU SEE. I HAVE THIS STRANGE FEELING THAT, WHERE OUR GOVERNMENT (AND ITS JUDICIARY WHICH ENFORCES ITS LEGISLATION) STATE THAT DISCRIMINATION IS CRIMINAL, THEY’RE ACTUALLY DISCRIMINATORY THEMSELVES AND ARE FEEDING US SHIT. HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT THAT? OR IS IT JUST ME?

Labour positive discrimination

A Planet for the president 2 1

Now, you see, it goes further and deeper than this. Not only does that positive discrimination come into play at the top end – and this discrimination covers a great deal I can assure you, just listen carefully to the video below – but it is throughout employment law.

You see, these politics – agenda ridden politics (and it isn’t just Labour I assure you) – infiltrate our judiciary, our courts, our employment law, right across the board. Now I don’t care if 99% of CEOs are black, white or Lesbian. I don’t care how many women are in top jobs in the government (another positive discrimination move to ensure this happens) or whether muslims have more councillors in London than white guys. AS LONG AS these people are put in these positions due to capability AND having the mindset of achieving whatever for the sake of ALL UK human beings (I don’t like the words “persons” or “citizens” for very obvious reasons if you read my blogs at all on the “legal person” issue). BUT, this agenda where, no matter what, the numbers of certain groups in certain positions of power in this country MUST reflect their percentage of population, is TOTAL AGENDA RIDDEN BULLSHIT!

I tell you what – If the government wants this, then let’s ask them to do a survey of the number of jews (secular or otherwise) in the House of Lords, the House of commons, the CEOs in our media, banks and Corporations. THEN let them work out the relative percentage of THESE people to their percentage of population. If it’s too low, put more in. If it’s too high, sack some of the fcukers! Get the picture? THEN there may be more positions available for, not only blacks but also white, straight christian males OR females?

AFTER ALL, IF YOU WANT A MORE APPROPRIATE PERCENTAGE TO REFLECT POPULATION, THAT GOES BOTH WAYS DOESN’T IT?

OR DOES IT?

DOES IT HELL!

And here’s another thing: While we hear the cries of “racial minorities” and muslims and homosexuals and whatever minority group you’d like to think of, shouting for THEIR proportional representation in positions which reflect their numbers in society, it’s funny but you never hear the jewish crew shouting about that do you? Any chance, then, that this is because, if they did, the rest of us would say “YOU HAVE GOT TO BE FCUKING JOKING!”

And another thing. Can you imagine this black Shadow Secretary, Chuka Umunna, complaining on behalf of white people if the tables were turned?

What is it this guy wants? The white guy saying “Yes Massa!”?

Take your positive discrimination Chuka and chuk it up your arse!

I’m not the racist Chuka – YOU ARE!

 

Here, take this: “Your problem is, is that you don’t have enough in your armoury. You’re not a racial minority, a sexual minority, a pregnant woman….. or ANYTHING REALLY”

I just happen to be a Straight, white male! And guess what happens to them in law? Don’t talk to me about “diversity” and “equality” you bunch of corrupt pricks!

Breach of contract but, as the Barrister says, “You’re not a black, gay pregnant woman!”… so you’re screwed!

Now, ANY of you pricks out there want to debate “DIVERSITY” with me? Bring it on!

And people wonder why people like Nigel Farage talk about “British people first”? And he’s not even saying ONLY white! And neither am I. But YOU bastards are!

 

So then let’s take a look at Sturgeon and her band of Progressives shall we? Let’s see what’s driving these points in the SNP’s manifesto……

 

“Och aye! We’re PROGRESSIVE!”

Unfortunately, half or more of the numpties in this country think “progressive” sounds good! “PROGRESS! AYE I’M AW FUR THAT! AND I’M INTAE PROGRESSIVE ROCK TOO! IN FACT MAYBE THIS IS THE GENESIS OF A NEW POLITICS!”

Arsehole! You haven’t got a goddamned clue what progressive means in this case!

But you don’t think that there is any agenda behind this “diversity” and “progressive” politics do you? Of course, if you’re female, you’ll say “Damn yeah I want 50/50!” and if you’re an immigrant or racial minority, you’ll say much the same. Of COURSE you will! But what you are doing is saying “to hell with who’s best for the job”. It could WELL be you but then again it may not.

So, welcome to the machine!

Diversity machine

Diversity 2

Diversity 3

Diversity 4

 

When I say Sturgeon and her SNP cronies are CHANGE AGENTS, I mean it! And she’s doing it all on behalf of a European Union that wants the UK broken up into WEE pieces so that it can more easily assimilate the parts into the Superstructure of the Superstate.

That is why you have SNP ready to fight tooth and nail to stop the British population, in any way it can, from having a vote for an in/out referendum on EU membership. She (they) will pull ANY trick to create divide so that the UK has no strength left to stand against the EU.

YOUR SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY. IT IS USING THE ATTACK ON WESTMINSTER TO HAVE YOU BELIEVE THEY DO BUT THEY CANNOT GIVE YOU INDEPENDENCE WHEN THEY ARE SLOTTING YOU INTO THE EU!

I DARE YOU TO DEMAND YOUR BELOVED STURGE TO GIVE YOU A REFERENDUM ON IT. THEN SEE HOW MUCH SHE LISTENS TO YOU!

SNP man 3

Now read your SNP manifesto points about “Diversity”, “Immigration” and “Equality”. And consider this: Re the economic needs associated with educating foreign students and, at their choosing, allowing them to have work visas afterwards – how about the Scottish government just ensure the education improves during the school years of our own children so that they fill our university places rather than foreigners? Or is it that your scottish government just think you’re too thick?

SNP man 1 SNP man 2

 

NICOLA STURGEON = AN EU TOOL

AND WHEN YOU CONSIDER JUST HOW MUCH THE MEDIA, GENERALLY, ARE HYPING HER AND SNP (EVEN THE “HATED” BBC) IT MAKES SENSE BECAUSE THE MEDIA ARE A BIG PART OF THE ESTABLISHMENT AND THE ESTABLISHMENT WANT THE EU.

SO BLOODY TRANSPARENT – EXCEPT TO THE SNP VOTERS!

 

PROGRESSIVE INDEED. THE FRANKFURT (AND TAVISTOCK) SCHOOL OF HUMAN RELATIONS! 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year, brainwashing you and confusing the shit out of you!

Please also read “Sturgeon and Tavistock”

Oh and last thing:

 

“The Rockefeller Foundation is proud to support this important survey to explore the country’s views on our changing demographics,” said John Irons, Managing Director, Foundation Initiatives, at The Rockefeller Foundation. “With our growing diversity comes a great deal of opportunity if we harness it effectively. The poll that we are releasing today gives us much to be optimistic about, with the majority of Americans seeing incredible opportunity as a result of our country’s rising diversity—and actually viewing it as a critical factor to our nation’s economic growth. We hope that this poll sparks increased conversation and ultimately increases action on both the local and national policy level to ensure that growing diversity equals growing opportunity as well.”

Washington, D.C. — New public opinion research conducted by the Center for American Progress and PolicyLink and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation found that Americans are much more open to diversity and supportive of steps to reduce inequalities between racial and ethnic groups than is commonly portrayed in politics and the media. The Latino Decisions study included close to 3,000 Americans, who shared their opinions on diversity, inequality, the role of government, and opportunity in America.

https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release/2013/10/22/77689/release-poll-shows-americans-embracing-diversity-and-strongly-supporting-steps-to-reduce-racial-and-ethnic-inequality/

Aye it all emanates from those bastards once again. But then what doesn’t?

Advertisements

Sturgeon and Tavistock

Posted in Politics by earthlinggb on April 18, 2015

Nicola-Sturgeon-Aberdeen

First of all, I’ll be upfront – I don’t like this “wee nippy sweetie” called Sturgeon.

As a “woman” she needs some botox on her top lip (or, perhaps a moustache) but even that wouldn’t help.

Screencaps-rab-c-nesbitt-12361996-449-360

Also, I hear continuously in her voice (and I’m scottish) an aggressive arrogance while selling my scottish brethren bullshit. She knows, as much as any other “leader”, that the monetary system and the “economy” she speaks of, is built upon a basic lie – that lie being that banks create money. That lie being that there has to be a National debt. She also lies when she uses the word “independence”. But the SNP followers simply never listen to sense or logic. You cannot have independence while part of the EU.2952222_953710d6d3_m

At this point, however, I wish to alert you to her comments re migration in the video below. It is extremely interesting to hear her speak about the need for migration into Scotland. A lot of the migration we have seen into the UK has been into areas of England. She seems to wish to increase the population of Scotland (then ask the scots to have more babies no? Ah, no. That’s not the idea. The idea is a political one for political aims. She’s looking to do a “Labour” migration policy into Scotland). She talks of having a “sensible migration policy”. Isn’t that precisely what UKIP are suggesting? Or is her “sensible” ideas not quite the same? What does she mean by a “sensible migration policy”? She does not elaborate here. It would be interesting to know would it not? And how does she intend to enforce that when we all know it is the EU (which SNP say Scotland will be “Independent” within) which determines such policy? Her comments come at around the 22 minute mark.vubery8a

The woman is full of shit (as was Salmond). And no, I’m not coming from the perspective of supporting any other Political Party because I support none of them. They are ALL full of shit. That said, if I still were in the “matrix” of believing in the system, my vote would go to UKIP, but I’m not. UKIP is as much zionist controlled as the rest of the parties. That’s why there is a UKIP “Friends of Israel” and that’s why Farage met Murdoch. The people who steer ALL of these parties lurk quietly (and in Murdoch’s case, not so quietly) behind the scenes. But Murdoch, himself, isn’t even a decision maker; he is an enabler through his media and he works for the decision makers.

 

Sturgeon talks at UCL TAVISTOCK School of Public Policy.

Our aims
To influence public policy through high quality academic research;
The School acts as the bridge between UCL’s world-class research and the policy-making community in Britain and internationally.
The School’s academic discipline is political science, including the fields of international relations and political theory. From 2001, the School has built up a core faculty of many academic staff across these fields, with a Department of Political Science coming formally into being in 2005. In addition the Constitution Unit specialises in constitutional reform and comparative constitutional studies.

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/aboutus

It’s not just a University – it’s a Think Tank. And if you know Tavistock at all, then I need say no more.
Why does Sturgeon feel it necessary to “sell” Scottish Independence to a University in London? I’ll leave you to consider that.

 

Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations

(layer of The Committee of 300)

This group was formed at Oxford University, London, by the Royal Institute of Of International Affairs in 1922. Major John Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was instructed to set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University.

This became the core of Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau. It was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into the Second World War and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey, which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on bombing German worker housing while leaving military targets, such as munition plants, alone. The munition plants on both sides belonged to the international bankers who had no wish to see their assets destroyed. The idea behind saturation bombing of civilian worker housing was to break the morale of the German worker.

It was not designed to affect the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and his team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population would collapse. The actual document was prepared by the Pru-dential Assurance Company. The RAF, under the command of “Bomber” Harris, carried out Lewin’s plans, culminating in the terror firestorm bombing of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and children, were killed.

The truth of “Bomber” Harris’s horror raids on German civilians was a well kept secret until long after the end of WW II. Today its primary mission is to establish a global brainwashing and opinion forming network. This institute is the originator of the Aquarian Conspiracy, designed to weaken the nations of the world by encouraging drug use, free sex, homosexuality and lesbianism. It has been very successful in the United States. It works through many research institutes and think tanks. The principal ones in the United States are the Stanford Research Institute, Rand Research and Development Corporation, the Institute For Policy Studies, the Aspen Institute, the Hudson Institute, and the Brookings Institute. Tavistock runs over 30 research institutions in the United States.

These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown into gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our government agencies and taking command of all policy making. One of Tavistock’s chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a founder member of NATO and a favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as an outstanding member of the Club of Rome.

When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO. For Five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome to destroy America’s education by taking control of the National Teachers Association and working in close conjunction with certain law makers and judges. Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called “social engineers” or “new-science social scientists” and they play an integral part in what we see, hear and read. The “old school” social engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril, Margaret Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor Lipssitt who, together with John Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of new-science scientists at Tavistock Institute.

 

According to its website, the Institute engages in educational, research, and consultancy work in the social sciences and applied psychology. Its clients are chiefly public sector organizations, including the European Union, several British government departments, and some private clients. The Institute owns Human Relations, the international social sciences journal. It also edits the journal Evaluation.

Kurt Lewin, a member of the Frankfurt school in America, was an important influence on the work of the Tavistock, according to Eric Trist, who expresses his admiration for Lewin in his autobiography.Kurt Lewin

Lewin had originally been involved with schools of behavioral psychology before changing directions in research and undertaking work with psychologists of the Gestalt school of psychology, including Max Wertheimer and Wolfgang Kohler. He also joined the Psychological Institute of the University of Berlin where he lectured and gave seminars on both philosophy and psychology. Lewin often associated with the early Frankfurt School, originated by an influential group of largely Jewish Marxists at the Institute for Social Research in Germany. But when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 the Institute members had to disband, moving to England and then to America. In that year, he met with Eric Trist, of the London Tavistock Clinic. Trist was impressed with his theories and went on to use them in his studies on soldiers during the Second World War.

Prominent psychologists mentored by Kurt Lewin included Leon Festinger (1919–1989), who became known for his cognitive dissonance theory (1956).

Change process
An early model of change developed by Lewin described change as a three-stage process. The first stage he called “unfreezing”. It involved overcoming inertia and dismantling the existing “mind set”. It must be part of surviving. Defense mechanisms have to be bypassed. In the second stage the change occurs. This is typically a period of confusion and transition. We are aware that the old ways are being challenged but we do not have a clear picture as to what we are replacing them with yet. The third and final stage he called “freezing”. The new mindset is crystallizing and one’s comfort level is returning to previous levels. This is often misquoted as “refreezing” (see Lewin,1947).

What the UK is currently ongoing is that “change” and it is being managed – not by the political parties presented to you, but by organisations which have been put in place to dramatically re-orient society across every element of its fabric.

We’re now seeing debates for the General Election – not based upon left and right politics so much (Labour and Conservative – because, in fact, there is no difference between them) but based upon SEVEN parties. Think about it. This is unheard of in UK politics. Not only that but the main three parties are now finding themselves becoming less and less relevant to the electorate. Why? Do you think that WE, the populace, have achieved this? Do you think WE have pressured the media to have 7 different representatives on our debates?

Not in your dreams! This is for the purpose of redefining what Britain is while having you believe there is a voice (an MP) somewhere in Her Majesty’s government, speaking for you on some subject. While the real power behind it all is still in power. You’re being had!

STURGEON ISN’T IN CONTROL OF SCOTLAND’S FATE. THE ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE, THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, CIA (YES the CIA) and HER MAJESTIC ONE are!

STURGEBUM is nothing but another “Right Honourable member of the Privy Council, CHANGE AGENT.

You want a single party government? Have one! You want Communism in the UK? Have it!

CBnbU_DWgAAn1Jo.jpg-large

 

Oh and one last thing Sturge:

SNP’s “Named Person” legislation for all children from birth to what is it? 18 years old?

Named person

So, while the Scottish SNP government believe that 16 and 17 year olds need a state guardian (of course they do. Just to make sure the state ensures their brainwashing), it seems Nickelarse believes they are sufficiently adult and capable to vote for the future of the country!

Announcing the measure as part of the The Scottish Referendum (Franchise) Bill earlier this year, Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said young people had the biggest stake in the future of the country.

16 yr old vote

 

FULL OF HYPOCRITICAL SHITE LIKE THE REST NICOLA. AS LONG AS THE DECISIONS ARE TO YOUR PERCEIVED BENEFIT.

SCOTLAND: THE “NANNY STATE” OF THE WORLD. AND NICOLA IS “BIG SISTER”!

Be careful what you vote for. You might just get it! The sheer fact that you still vote at all guarantees you’ll get it!

Rodrigo the Rat

Posted in Finance, Money, The Corrupt SOB's by earthlinggb on April 18, 2015

Rodrigo Rato. Finally one caught and, hopefully, put away for a very long time.

Now, please see my blogpost from 2010 regarding Rato and Emilio Botin (now dead) of Santander. Of course, at the time of writing this blog 5 years ago, it was branded “Conspiracy theory”. Now, because it has been proven what a rat he is, it’s a “scandal” because us Conspiracy theorists are never allowed to be considered correct. Otherwise it might just catch on you know? People might actually start listening to us!

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2010/01/27/santander-a-banking-giant-out-of-the-blue/

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/santander-madoff-ponzi-scheme-banking-criminals/

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2010/02/22/santander-update/

 

Rat Rato

The Monetary System

Posted in Money, Politics by earthlinggb on April 5, 2015

I WANT TO SEE THE “WHITES” OF UKIP’s EYES!

Gerald O'Brien UKIP

Gerald O’Brien UKIP

 

Dear Mr Taylor,

I have created a “Change.org” petition regarding the need for a discussion/debate around the issue of money issuance in the UK. Please see the link:

https://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-david-cameron-mp-nicola-sturgeon-to-provide-the-uk-electorate-with-a-public-televised-assessment-and-debate-regarding-the-issuance-of-currency-within-the-united-kingdom-2

On your website, it is stated:

SOMETHING TO SAY TO US?

Do you want to tell us anything?

Ask a question? Complain about something?

Get us to do something for you?

Whatever it is, we value your input and will always respond.

Contact:

Norman Taylor (chairman UK Ashford branch)

Tel: 01233 822 132

Email: normantaylor@email.com

What I would like you, and all members of the UKIP party to do, is sign this petition. While I speak of a solution to the problem known as “Mathematically Perfected Economy”, I realise many people will not be accustomed with the term and, as such, I am not asking that people support the implementation of it but simply that they support the necessity for there being a public discussion of the matter of money issuance. From this, it would then be possible to assess and discuss in greater detail, how money works presently and how that is the underlying issue which impacts every facet of life from austerity to war. All wars are resource wars in one form or another. The reason for such is due to the debt interest applied to nations and the fact that the interest portion of the debt does not circulate in any economy. Since it does not, it is necessary for nations to compete but not only compete but to war. The only way for one nation to pay off (or, I should say, continue to service) its debt is by acquiring the principle of another nation’s economy.
The accumulation of wealth by the few is through what is, in fact, insider trading. The use of Hedge funds and other vehicles make this possible.
Alan Greenspan joined Paulson & Co just before the crash in 2008 (he joined around Jan 2007) and advise Paulson on the mortgage market (insider knowledge of course) and Paulson’s Hedge Fund made a killing (one of the largest if not THE largest gains a HF had ever made) by shorting the market.
In addition, on this side of the Atlantic, Ken Clarke joined Centaurus Hedge Fund around the same time.

Nigel-Farage-Ukip-Debate-Nigel-Farage-TV-Debate-Political-Parties-Debate-On-TV-551204
Our Cabinet Ministers, Prime Ministers and Corporations and Banks, write the legislation which they obviously know will impact certain industries and even nations. People like Tony Blair (and many others) then, having pushed through legislation on others’ behalf then find themselves paid off by being provided with jobs with the like of J.P.Morgan. None of this is difficult to comprehend or see.
I could write a script on this but I will stop there. I’ll just end by saying that it is the present monetary system whereby banks issue currency (not create it) and charge interest upon money they don’t actually have (thereby they bring no consideration to the contract/loan) but have been given a legal privilege to issue. That interest does not exist anywhere in any economy, therefore, it is easily seen why and how all countries are in debt. There is a net global debt which is actually impossible to exist unless there is some entity which that debt is owed to. That debt is due to interest and due to the fact that both, governments and individuals all have to use a form of currency which is legally owned by a global banking system. The fact is that it is individuals who create money (its value) and that banks are unnecessary middlemen in any transaction between two individuals. All banks do to make a profit is demand that our promissory obligations to one another go through their system and they “re-present” these obligations to one another with their versions (electronic or cash) of our promissory notes.
They obfuscate the true nature of what is going on and it is, in fact, outright fraud.

Billboard3
I would appreciate your, and Gerald O’Brien’s response to this. I would hope UKIP would positively support such a discussion since it is this issue which is causing many of the symptoms your party and this country is concerned about.
Regards,

PS: I have a background in both, University level Physics and Business Studies.

 

Of course I understand what I will get (if anything) is some wooly worded thank you and “that’s interesting” and “UKIP are committed to….” etc.

Just wanted it on record. Another party (of the people) ignore the real issues and core problem.

Because to be a party, you must adhere to the establishment rules otherwise you would never BE a party (or last as one).

All good fun! Keep putting your X in the box. After all, that’s how they see you – as an X, a thumb print, an idiot.