I have blogged about the two major control factors which run this world – Money (the reality of it) and Law (the “legal personality”) for many years now.
Unfortunately, there is scant interest from the vast majority of the “unwashed masses” who forever wonder why things never get any better while they vote “left” out and “Right” in and vice versa for decades and centuries. They complain, they bitch and moan and EVERYTIME the controllers offer up a “New Messiah” speaking words that resonate with them (that is what they do and always have), those “great unwashed” swallow it all, gobble it up and, for a while, get all excited at the prospect – and forlorn hope (hope is ALL you ever get) – of change.
However, there never will be any. Why? Because as you have just shown once more, you’re so easily led into believing AGAIN that the new guy in the Oval Office really is “change”. I could go into why he’s not but that is not the point of this blog.
The point of this blog is to bring it to your attention, once more, that there are people in this world – even today – who know there is no need for the existing money system and that it is, in fact, a con and the scourge of humanity. It is the reason for all our ills, our depressions, our desperation, our murders, hate, anger and wars. Not ALL but most. Some will say “No, it’s religion” but what is organised religion? It is all to do with spiritual and temporal power over masses and that power is gained by riches (money). Remember, money is just a means, it is not the end goal.
This post is called “A ‘New’ Money system” but, in fact, it is not new at all. It has always been known of, just never put into practice because, if it were, those who have ruled would rule no more. The “legal personality” is the mechanism, in law, by which those who own and control the money system today, have been able to “engineer” it.
Yes, there are “bloodlines” and these bloodlines must maintain and further their power to the point that “The meek shall inherit the earth”. The “meek” is not you and I. The “meek” (in THEIR bible) is them.
So, onto the articles worth reading:
Well, first, let me re-post one of the most significant and telling responses from the US Federal Reserve Chairman ever put on record:
He doesn’t say HOW, of course, but he DOES say “Yes” it is possible for a nation to have a currency without a national debt. And it is NOT just because private banks could issue it. Private Banks are “legal persons”. YOU are a “legal person” (ignore, for the moment, that the legal person itself is a con). The point right now is that a LEGAL PERSON (of any nature) CAN ISSUE MONEY – so YOU can! This is not a theory, it is a FACT!
Now, to President Roosevelt:
Bighamton Press, Sept 14th 1934.
Just as a Corporation is given “Legal Personality” by the law/Government, Trade Unions also are afforded “legal personality”. You would think the, therefore, that ALL persons are equal before the law right? WRONG! Why? Well those who are the majority Stakeholders in Corporations also have majority stakes in Banks and the Federal Reserve Private Banks. So who do you think has the say toward government and the power of money behind them? You have to understand that Roosevelt knew this. He was not a stupid man! So while he talked a good talk…..
Now to Woodrow Wilson: An article from not long before he became President and ushered in the Federal Reserve Act.
From “The Sun” September 25th 1910 (not the British rag):
“Guilt is always PERSONal” but the Corporation IS a “person” in law, therefore, those who truly own and control the Banks (also “persons) and Corporations are as if they are protected by the greatest of force fields. They can direct policies of any nature which is anti – public or individual or environmental and it is PEOPLE who drive these policies. Yet, it is the Corporation itself (a fictitious “person” existing by means of its own “birth certificate”, the Articles of Incorporation agreed to by the State) which is sued – if at all. A Corporation cannot be committed to jail for fraud or any other crime but the actual flesh and blood persons could IF this “force field” was removed.
Did Woodrow Wilson remove it while President? Not at all. In fact, he strengthened it plus he oversaw the introduction of the Federal Reserve and the IRS!
So now, let’s turn to E.C.Riegel – a name that many will not have heard of (but you MAY have heard of a man by the name of Mike Montagne who has claimed the originator of the MPE – Mathematically Perfected Economy – idea). No doubt Mr Montagne has worked on the idea for many years in great detail but the reality of money was known to many others – well known and not so well known – many years/decades, perhaps even centuries beforehand. The above indicate why such a money system has never been allowed to be put in place. The following describes what that money system, essentially, is.
THE MONETARY PHILOSOPHY OF E.C.RIEGEL:
- For a Person to exert Money Power is natural and wholesome (for “person” assume individual and that no such “Corporate Persons” exist).
- For the state to exert Money Power is unnatural and perverse.
- Until the state acquired Money Power, the state was, at worst, a parasite upon the economy; with the Money Power, it became a perverter of the economy. Men no longer merely tolerated it, they sought the exercise of the money power in their favour.
- Thus, man’s attitude toward the state and the state’s power over man were completely altered.
- Out of man’s motive of winning benefits from the state grew various political “ideologies” designed to screen the acquisitive purposes of their proponents.
- Thus the acquisition of the money power by the state marked a politico-economic revolution as it gave to the state the power, through fiscal policy, to control the economy and turned men’s minds from private enterprise to methods of its political control and perversion.
- Our present type of state should be identified as the monetary state and distinguished from the pre-monetary state.
- Money power exerted by the state is inescapably perverse; the monetary state is a frustrator of all aims of economic and political liberty.
- In the exercise of the money power, the state is driven inevitably from the libertarian forms of democracy and republicanism to the autarchic forms of fascism, socialism and communism.
- These are distinguished only by the manner in which the state’s money power is exercised but derived from one theory – that the exertion of money power is a function of the state.
- The grand issue is between the monetary state of today and the de-monetized state of tomorrow, wherein man will assert exclusive money power under the principle that only producers may create money.
- Thereafter the politico-economic issues that now exist will be no more, for the state will have lost its power to inflect the economy either to the left or to the right.
- The aim is not to pose a political revolution but to induce a revolution in thinking of money and an evolutionary movement through local, non political, action to establish a private enterprise money system independent of the existing political money system.
PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MONEY
A Non-Political Money System
by E. C. Riegel
In the preface to the book, the author says this:
The life of modern man depends upon his mastery of money.
Our political money system is breaking down and must be displaced by one that serves the needs of modern exchange. Otherwise our civilization will perish.
As technological improvements tend to specialize and confine each man’s production, the need for the exchange of products increases, and, therefore, man’s dependence upon money makes the mastery of this vital agency more and more imperative.
Production grows more mechanical, while consumption, on the other hand, has no machine technique; it still operates by our hands and bodies. Therefore there can never be mass consumption to coordinate with mass production. Consumption remains private and individual. Production grows more interdependent——requiring the coordination of many machines and many hands——while the function of consumption cannot be shared or mechanized; it is human, individual, self-dependent.
To fulfill the function of consumption (without which production is purposeless) the individual must be, as buyer, a self-starter and self-stimulator, and therefore, money power, sufficient to buy his production, must be at the command of every man. Otherwise the people cannot coordinate their consumption with their production and this deficiency causes the production machine to clog and recoil with vicious consequences. Not only are these economic results painful in themselves, but they cause the people to turn to political intervention as a remedy, and this complicates the problem and increases the peril.
WE MUST HAVE LESS RATHER THAN MORE POLITICAL INTERVENTION AND THIS BOOK WILL SHOW THAT IT IS POLITICAL INTERVENTION THROUGH THE MONEY SYSTEM THAT BREEDS ALL OUR ILLS. PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MUST, IF IT IS TO BE PRESERVED AND PERFECTED, HAVE A PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MONEY SYSTEM. THE POLITICAL MONEY SYSTEM IS INHERENTLY ANTIPATHIC TO PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND INEVITABLY TENDS TO COMMUNIZATION.
Our mass production power must be balanced by our individual buying power and our buying power is dependent upon our individual money-creating power. Money cannot meet modern needs by descending to the people; it must rise from them. Until this is comprehended mass production must continue to miscarry. We, as consumers, must literally make money or be stymied. Government cannot assume this responsibility for us. Every individual producer must exert the right and assume the duty of creating money, if there be need therefore, to buy the value of his own production. There cannot be full distribution of wealth without full distribution of money power. He who would make must also take——in ratio. Each of us must have the ability to create fountain pen money with our own hands. Machine production must be coordinated with handmade money.
Recurrent business slumps, mal-distribution, over-production, unemployment, panics and depressions are but the gentler reminders that our industrial life is in danger. In the end war presses a gun against our head with the demand——money or your life. Must our economic and political maladies be compounded into periodic cataclysms and our civilization be destroyed before we master money?
Typical of the stress laid by economists upon the need for sustained purchasing power is the following quotation from “The Dilemma of Thrift” written in 1926 by William Trufant Foster and Waddill Catchings:
“In fact, adequate, sustained consumer-demand would do more than any other means now within human control toward increasing wealth, abolishing poverty, maintaining employment, solving labor problems, increasing good will among men generally, and maintaining the peace of the world. No means of preventing war holds out such large immediate possibilities as this… It is, therefore, difficult to exaggerate the importance of finding a means of sustaining purchasing power. The next world war, if it does come, may well be the last war——at least the last war in which the present nations will have any interest, for it may well destroy civilization itself.”
Well, “the next world war” has come and is upon us, and whether or not it is leading to the destruction of civilization will not be determined by the outcome of the military phase of the war. The issue cannot be determined by military victory. Its cleavage is not the battle front. Both Axis and Allied Nations are committed to the system of government-created purchasing power, whether they be classed as fascist, communist or democratic. The broad question that will determine the fate of humanity is whether the evil practice of synthetic buying power by governments shall continue to the inevitable collapse of the social order or whether the producer of wealth will exert his natural buying power and thus avert disaster.
Without reservation I assert that the whole fate of society hinges upon the one question of whether it can at this critical juncture gain mastery through the mastery of money and thus coordinate purchasing power with producing power. The issue is——money or your life.
——E. C. Riegel
In the introduction, his first words are:
Man has two major problems. His first problem is: HOW TO PROSPER. His second problem is:
HOW TO GOVERN GOVERNMENT.
The solution of one is the solution of the other. It lies in the understanding and exercising of his inherent money power through a non-political money system.
Because man has not mastered the problem of achieving prosperity, he has turned to government for its solution. Thus he has complicated his problem, for government offers no solution to the problem of prosperity, while its intervention in this primary problem brings the additional problem of how to govern government. When government undertakes to solve man’s problem for him it undertakes the mastery of society and it cannot be both master and servant. Thus it has failed in both spheres. By intertwining the prosperity problem with the political problem man has snarled the threads and no solution of either is possible without separation.
EVILS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM
The present money system has three basic evils:
It permits money to be issued privately, only by a limited number of persons and
corporations who have bank credit, and makes such credit subject to fee. Thus it establishes credit as a privilege rather than a right, and makes it an object of profit rather than a utility to further the production and distribution of wealth. It denies to producers generally the right to issue money, thus making it impossible to expand buying power to potential producing power. This results in defeating the mass production system.
It permits the government to issue unbacked money. The only way the government could
back its money issues would be to go into the production of goods and services; and this would compete with private business. Thus the problem offers the two horns of a dilemma, both of which lead to socialization. If it backs its money issues with goods and services (and there is no other way it can be backed), it executes a frontal attack on private enterprise. If it issues money without backing it (as it is doing), it executes a flank attack on private business through inflation——since to issue money without creating equivalent values is to inflate.
It permits ambitious or designing or fanatical men who are in control of government to
light the fires of war, threatening the lives and fortunes of untold millions. This terrible power lies solely in the political money system since armaments spring from money and money springs from government fiat, whereas it should spring only from the fiat of the people who would thus hold the veto power.
It is a fantastic book which leads the reader to a far better understanding of what freedom actually means (Americans belief in their “Land of the free” is just so naive as they keep swinging between their Democrats and Republicans, just as we do here in the UK with Labour and Conservative and just about every other nation does. Even in the autocratic countries, the money power is still exerted by the state and controlled by the global banking fraternity.
Until we break this, you can vote to your heart’s delight and, as you, your parents and your parents’ parents have seen, nothing changes. Well. it does, but never positively. It takes two parents to work to keep a family afloat today while the feminists THINK they have done themselves and the world population a favour. They actually have no idea what they have done and how they were manipulated into doing it.
Schenectady Gazette, 26th December 1933:
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, December 29th 1913
Now, I’ve blogged long and hard over years about this subject – Money and law. I’ve introduced you to MPE (Mathematically Perfected Economy) and have strived to explain, again and again, what money actually is AND what “the law” and “legal person” actually are.
People say to me “Well, if you’re so smart DO something!” However, NOTHING can be done without this knowledge being imparted to everyone and and a vast number of people “feeling” it so much that they are determined to act, together. However, the vast number of people just want an easy life. The irony is they complain that their lives aren’t easy and guess what? THIS is why!
Oy veh! Just keep paying your dues!
NB: The quotes of Thomas Jefferson are oftentimes used wrt money and banking – such as follows:
“I sincerely believe… that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” ~Letter to John Taylor, 1816
But even Jefferson (and many today who keep talking about Gold and Silver and that money should be issued by the state tax free) either have gotten it wrong OR they have an agenda. Jefferson wanted the State to be in control rather than private bankers, however, as is clear and obvious from the foregoing, neither the state nor the banks – neither of whom are producers of any kind – should have the power of issue of money. We, the producers, have the only true right to do so.
I know, These songs have been around for a while now but I’ve created a few remixes and with better volume/dynamics. I’d be only too pleased to see a few “likes” on the Soundcloud page before I start to think of writing more.
So, we heard about the german, Richard Gutjahr – married to Einat Wilf an Israeli jew, Knesset MP and “ex” Lieutenant in the Intelligence corp within the IDF – who just so happened to have been right place (on his balcony) at the right time (literally seconds before the truck went on its rampage) in the previous blogpost. How “lucky” is that? That they weren’t in the crowd that night BUT Richard had the presence of mind to just start filming a truck at precisely the right time.
Richard and Einat have a son it would appear but, from the look of Richard, sorry, but I have to say I’m surprised. He looks like he should be fronting and LGBT group – but I digress.
So, this is the first couple of ATHEISTS (which they say themselves, they are “devout” about). It’s strange, then, when you read SO MANY TIMES of these jewish atheists (Einat) and their spouses who are also “very supportive” of one particular religion: Judaism. Even, in this case, a German atheist spouse! Why would an atheist (if that is what you are) have any singular interest in a religion? Unless, of course, they consider jews as a race – something the jews, generally, love to use when it suits and drop when it suits.
Here’s an interview with Einat Wilf:
Anyhow, they made a good choice of being in NICE together didn’t they? Oh yes they did! 😉
Now, here’s the next point and it’s a BIGGIE:
The UK’s Daily Telegraph reported as follows (and not too many people seem to have picked up on it – as usual) –
A JEWISH FATHER HAS A “PREMONITION” – these jews get their word from G-d you know (or they have Crystal balls if they’re atheists of course)
HOW DID YOU DO THAT, HAVE YOU GOT POWERS, HOW DID YOU KNOW?
Well, even his own son asks it BUT the zionist controlled media haven’t bothered to EVEN THOUGH they quote him on it. Odd don’t you think? 🙂
Not at all!
You see, once you READ (remember books and stuff and a requirement for more than an 8 second attention span?), you begin to see/recognise a big picture which is repeated and repeated time and again. I want to introduce you to a paper written many years ago by the American Think Tank, The CATO Institute. The paper is called “The Green Peril” and explains they creation of a new “bogeyman” to replace the “Red Menace” at the end of the Cold War. You see, the global establishment needs your belief in these menaces and perils to keep you in fear. Fear rules. Fear makes you lash out at created (by them) events which make you plead with your “betters”, your “leaders”, the “government” for protection. How do they protect? By taking away basic freedoms; by clamping down on free speech; by shutting down portions of the internet (and the time will likely come for this blog and many like it). You see, to give you these connections and to show you what we do, is called “hate speech”. You can shut hate speech down in a nanosecond if those who, still in fear, demand it. You just don’t get it though do you? As you give them the power to do this, they take it step by step and, one day, you’ll be shut down. I know tons of people who are scared today to speak their mind. Some of these people have been high up in her majesty’s Armed Forces. But, by all means, you keep demanding “protection” but don’t you think they aren’t doing a very good job of it? I can’t help but laugh at you cretins. Cretins are those of you who believe in statism – the Jeremy Corbyn believers and the Donald Trump believers. Those of you who always fall into the trap of being told by such people what you want to hear.
Anyhow, here’s the paper:
By Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post no less. (It gets funnier and funnier). And notice the year: 1992. So, another “crystal ball” from a jew a long time before the world even sensed such a threat. Why? Because it didn’t exist until they wanted it to.
Indeed, like the Red Menace of the Cold War era, the Green Peril is perceived as a cancer spreading around the globe, undermining the legitimacy of Western values and political systems. The cosmic importance of the confrontation would make it necessary for Washington to adopt a longterm diplomatic and military strategy; to forge new and solid alliances; to prepare the American people for a neverending struggle that will test their resolve; and to develop new containment policies, new doctrines, and a new foreign policy elite with its “wise men” and “experts.”
Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain. “It’s big; it’s scary; it’s anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and discontent,” wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam “spreads across vast swaths of the globe that can be colored green on the television maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red.”
The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious “sources” and unnamed officials who leak information, float trial balloons, and warn about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions taking place within government. Their information is then augmented by colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorial terrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named and other villains. The media end up finding corroboration from foreign sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S. government and help the press uncover further information substantiating the threat coming from the new bad guys.
Anyhow, there is a lot more so read the damned thing and enlighten yourselves. Otherwise, you’re just going to be another twat swallowing the crap from the BBC or CNN etc. There’s tons of such assholes – they’re called “normal” and think nothing of their country bombing the shit out of innocent human beings.
But behind it all is a jewish influence that needs to vilify Islam and the everyday jew supports it with their silence as do christians with their ignorance and as do muslims, believe it or not, with their silence and fear of being considered an “extremist”.
That said, what keeps it ALL going (even those who are controlling it) is ALL of us with our petty prejudices, racism, greed, ignorance and fear.
“THEY” love it!
First: What do I mean by “full jew”? Is that an anti semitic slur or a reflection of the consistency of the absolutely necessary for their survival, jewish “victimhood” and consistent lies to continue the belief?
I say it is the latter. Trust me, it most surely is.
- MP, Lucy Allan, caught red-handed lying and playing a victim. I could say more about women playing victims and how they have a lot in common with jews but I won’t. After all, you reading this may just be a “NAWALT”.
2. Lucy Allan should be removed from office for this. Will she be framing a man next for rape? You see, the man who wrote to her could have very well got a visit by the Police and charged for threatening behaviour online, hate speech or any other number of offences our government have created to control you!
3. The facts:
This is the lie that Lucy Allan wrote on her Facebook post which she then removed. Too late Lucy!
This is the response from Lucy to cover her bare faced lie which could have put an innocent man in jail:
This is the real email which “Rusty” sent:
Now why do I bring up jews again? Why do I say she’s gone “full jew”?
Well here’s a couple of examples (just a couple) –
Want more? Don’t make life tedious for me please.
MURDERING ON BEHALF OF FUCKING PSYCHOS!
And ex Prime Ministers (and Presidents) who protect paedophiles in their midst!
FUCKING PSYCHOS? You ain’t kidding! But carry on lads and keep coming home in body bags as statistics believing that your posthumous “hero” status makes up for it. Otherwise, come home with a limb or two missing or even in one piece and look around you at the country you believe you’re fighting for! Are you? So then how come it is falling apart? How come we actually fund ISIS? How is it that your mother, father, sister or brother are finding it so damned difficult to make ends meet? How come there are so many on the streets? How come, if you’re fighting for our freedom, our freedoms are going to hell in a handbasket?
Not just fucking psychos then but fucking idiots too!
AND YOU’LL NEVER GET IT! THAT PENNY WILL NEVER DROP. BECAUSE YOU’RE THICK AND WANT TO BE MUMMY’S HERO COZ THERE”S NOTHING ELSE FOR YOU TO DO BECAUSE OUR EDUCATION SYSTEM AND OUR GOVERNMENT, IS NOT SET UP FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING THIS COUNTRY INTO WHAT IT COULD AND SHOULD BE. IT’S ALL FOR THEM! WHAT YOU DO IS FOR THEM!
WHO ARE THEY? EDUCATE YOURSELF YOU GOON! I’M PASSED TRYING TO DO IT FOR YOU!
I like that Muse took this overall issue as the basis for their new album “Drones”.
Here’s my same message from a year or so back. But I point to a fundamental of the problem.
While Roger Waters crystallizes nicely where these psychos who give the orders to the psychos should be placed.
FIGHTING FOR A BUNCH OF PSYCHOS WHO JUST WANT POWER, USE IT, ABUSE IT, KEEP YOU AND YOUR FAMILY DOWN AND ARE PAEDOPHILES AND/OR PAEDOPHILE PROTECTORS. YEP, YOU’RE AN ARMED FORCES TO BE PROUD OF!
AFTER ALL, IF IT WASN’T FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST CENTURY OR SO, BRITAIN WOULDN’T BE WHAT IT IS TODAY!
WHAT IS IT?
OH YEAH, JUST AS I SAID, A DEN OF PAEDOPHILES WHO ARE TRYING TO HANG ON TO THEIR POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER YOU SO THEY TRY TO SILENCE PEOPLE LIKE ME AND YOU AND THE POLICE SUPPORT THEM IN DOING SO! MAN YOU ARE FUCKING HEROES!
WHAT? YOU SAID YOU’RE HER MAJESTY’S ARMED FORCES?
YES, SO YOU ARE.
AND HER MAJESTY”S SECRET SERVICE ARE PROTECTING (AND ENSURING THEY GET TO POWERFUL POSITIONS) PAEDOPHILES.
WHILE HER MAJESTY’S SON(S?) ARE INTO THE UNDERAGE THING TOO!
THE UK POPULATION: ‘PROTECTED’ BY PSYCHO “HEROES”.
DO YOU FEEL FREE?
Serve in the armed forces?
Are you being served?
You’re as free as Mr Humphries mate!
But then, today, that just might suit you!
The Milgram experiment on obedience to authority figures was a series of notable social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.
YOU DO AS YOU’RE TOLD!
And you end up with skulls and bones. How apt – Stanley Milgram the Yale psychologist!
The Nuremberg Defense refers to a legal strategy employed by many of the defendants at the Nuremberg war crimes trials seeking to convict Nazi perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the Second World War. Many of those defendants claimed that they were not guilty of the charges against them as they were “only following orders.”
Adolf Eichmann was one of the most prominent Nazis to use this defense at his trial (held in Israel in 1961).
“”I cannot recognize the verdict of guilty. . . . It was my misfortune to become entangled in these atrocities. But these misdeeds did not happen according to my wishes. It was not my wish to slay people. . . . Once again I would stress that I am guilty of having been obedient, having subordinated myself to my official duties and the obligations of war service and my oath of allegiance and my oath of office, and in addition, once the war started, there was also martial law. . . . I did not persecute Jews with avidity and passion. That is what the government did. . . . At that time obedience was demanded, just as in the future it will also be demanded of the subordinate.
He was “just following orders” (let’s forget the fact that no such order has ever been found to prove the Germans ever had a “final solution” to murder 6 million jews and forget the fact that the number of jews who died – not a proof of gas chambers to be seen – has been revised downward to less than a million! Yet Eichmann was charged with killing 6 million! How about that?)
So. No better than a Nazi (considering what you have been brainwashed to believe a Nazi was and did). And Eichmann was so right: “At the time, obedience was demanded, just as in the future it will also be demanded of the subordinate.
And that’s all you are: A subordinate!
Bitch, literally meaning a female dog, is a slang pejorative for a person, commonly a woman, who is belligerent, unreasonable, malicious, a control freak, rudely intrusive or aggressive. When applied to a man, bitch is a derogatory term for a subordinate.
You’re nothing but another man’s bitch!
So I booked online so there was no human interaction.
Went to Tokyo for a week and checked in to the “Robotica hotel”. A sign on the revolving door as I entered proclaimed “Our staff are persons too. Please treat with respect!” I wondered if they took holidays too and topped up their tans but, somehow, I doubted it.
The reception staff and porters however had been programmed with that usual American fakery of “Have a nice day!” so nothing much had changed.
I was tired after the trip and just wanted to hit the bed and said so to the Android behind the reception desk. A moment later, I was surrounded by a bunch of male androids looking like they had been training in the gym for the last 10 years and taken copious amounts of steroids but realised the look must come from a different gauge of engine oil. The Androidenal receptionist had quietly pushed a panic button thinking I was intent on violence toward my bed. The robots hadn’t been programmed with colloquialisms.
So, anyhow, once that was sorted, I got my cardkey and made my way to the room. Before hitting the sack however, I realised I hadn’t asked for a wake up call so I called reception and booked one. “Certainly sir! What time would you like the wake up call for?”
“Oh…. eleven minutes past nine I think” I replied and, for a moment, the androidenal receptionist fell silent as if she/it was processing the requirement. “Certainly sir! A wake up call for nine minutes past eleven. Goodnight”.
I replaced the receiver and dropped into bed and was out like a light.
The next moment I know I’m awake. It’s already morning and I sense a presence at the bottom of my bed. I just had time to rub my eyes and look up when I realised it was the receptionist from the previous night. She stared at me with a slightly curled lip smile and screamed….
“9/11 was an inside job!”
I woke up!
Did you ever consider that “The Internet of things” had a ring of the movie title “The Shape of things to come”?
Samsung SMART TV policy booklet:
“Please be aware that if your spoken words include personal or other sensitive information, that information will be among the data captured and transmitted to a third party through your use of Voice Recognition.”
Enjoy your new investment and your new iMAC or PC with retina scan or the new chip under your skin which allows you to access things as if you’re living, breathing “Star Trek”.
Enjoy it all because someone, somewhere is enjoying you! 😉
Oh and did I mention Tom Tom’s and the like? Even your smartphone! Tracking and listening.
But, for some (and I know a few) it’s “great technology and fun and you have to be paranoid to believe it would be used for dark purposes”
Yes son, keep believing! 😉
Just a few questions and a suggestion.
Do you vote?
Do you believe in tax?
Do you believe in the necessity of government?
Are you religious?
Are you a zionist?
Do you “support the troops”?
Do you wear a poppy?
Do you believe in the law as it currently works?
Do you think money is CREATED by banks?
Do you think everyone should pay for their council tax (“because I do!”)
Do you watch Big Brother? (and various other SHITE on TV)
Is it only a fact when you hear it on the BBC or other regulated TV news?
Are you a monarchist?
Do you believe in Capitalism, Communism, Socialism, fascism or any other fucking “ism”?
Well, that list isn’t exhaustive but it covers a lot.
Point is, if you have answered positively to any of the above: GET THE FUCK off my blog you arse!
Thank you kindly!
… that you euthanised my mother (which I suspect you did), I’d fucking kill you! After all, you would have taken it upon yourself to murder her! And first on the list would be Tony Blair.
“Ok, at least give us a million would ya?”
Here we have an article from the Times of Israel (they just can’t let it rest can they?):
NOTE: 1.1 MILLION! While, of course, they HAVE to account for the vast majority don’t they? They just happen to have lost about 3 million from the figure (of which, in the 4 million they used to speak of, about 3.5M were probably jews according to them) so now it’s 1.1 million, they NEED to ensure the jews account for at least into a million – anything less would just not do! “We must keep it to a million at the very least guys. A million sounds so much better than say 750,000 damn it!” 😉
So, while the above is considered “authoritative” (of course), well so was below at the time. Remember that in 1944/45, perhaps even 1946 and 47 (I need to check the latter two years while I have checked the previous two) there were absolutely no mentions in parliament of any “gas chambers” – not a one!
When you read this, think of the enormity of dealing with 35,000 bodies PER DAY! IF that were true, then the 1.1 million alleged could have been gassed and cremated within approximately a month. So, if that was the purpose of the camps then why keep them fed and sheltered at all? To work? What a waste of time and German soldiers time when they could be put to better use on the killing fields. God I hate getting sold bullshit stories by people who actually expect me to be so fucking simple minded don’t you?
Two provisional gas chambers, known as bunkers 1 and 2, went into operation next to the Birkenau construction site in 1942, when Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss was entrusted with carrying out part of the campaign to exterminate the Jews. They were adapted farmhouses that previously belonged to expelled Poles. The first began operating in early 1942, probably in March, and the second in mid-year.
The construction of a complex of four gigantic gas chambers and crematoria began in mid-1942. The Germans estimated that 1.6 million people a year could be killed and burned there.
Watch this video. This is an alleged gas chamber while it also shows two small ovens INSIDE THE GAS CHAMBER! Not only that but we are to believe, from this, that up to 35,000 people were then cremated in those style of ovens?! THINK!
OH! BY THE WAY. IN THE VIDEO, NOTE THE TWO “DANCING ISRAELIS” (quickly then edited out) I laughed my ass off at that did you?
But then there are other versions of the “ovens” story where we are told the Nazis would burn people laid across rail tracks and piled something like 20 feet high! An earlier blog demonstrates the ridiculousness of this in a video. It is all just madness and it is not until people actually take the time and effort to consider the logistics and so called “facts” which just do not stand up to scrutiny, that they come to recognise it is all bollocks!
Now, here comes the “authoritative” Mr Bowles in 1947 with his 4 million, gold teeth to improve Germany’s gold reserve! lol Are these people serious? Well yes they were. Seriously trying to make us believe make believe!
HC Deb 27 October 1947 vol 443 cc517-607
Mr. Bowles (Nuneaton) The Debate so far has concentrated upon Germany and upon two approaches to it. The one is the moral approach and the second approach that of the British Government. I am going to approach Germany for a few minutes from rather a different direction. I have been in Germany. I spent some weeks there in the early part of this year, and I took some time during the recent Recess to go to Poland. It might be of interest to the House—and I am glad the Foreign Secretary is in his place—if I conveyed to the House and to him in particular some of the feelings of that people numbering some 24 million. That was the only country which really had been physically moved under the Potsdam Agreement. The House will remember that the Russians took a good deal of Eastern Poland and under that agreement Poland recovered Lower Silesia, referred to in Poland today as the “recovered territories.” They are much more industralised than the territories which she lost in the East.
The House will remember that on 1st September, 1939, Hitler started the war by an unannounced bombardment of Warsaw. The fight for the capture of Warsaw and Poland lasted 29 days and then Poland gave in. Then in 1944, there was a terrible uprising which lasted some 63 days, in which a great deal more damage was done to Warsaw in particular. In 1945, Hitler knew he could no longer remain in Warsaw and he instructed his 556 troops—75,000 that were left—to raze that city to the ground street by street. The older buildings they incinerated by ordinary fire, and they blew up those more strongly built. It might be important for the House to recollect that the Polish people lost six million of their population during those six years of war. These things might be borne in mind when we speak about the Germans, and about the state of Europe as we view it this distance away. Although we have had friends and relatives lost and cities bombarded, when we remember that Warsaw was 85 per cent. destroyed and all its bridges blown, we can understand something of the feelings which exist there.
It has also to be borne in mind that there was not a Poland in 1913. It was then in occupation by Germany, Austria and Russia, and had been for 150 years. Poland, more or less as it is now, has been fought over by the Russians and Germans for 1,000 years, and how the Poles have suffered it is impossible to understand. They have a very great hatred for the Russians because they remember how the Russians treated them only in the early years of the war, but they have a worse feeling for the Germans because in the Auschwitz concentration camp, which I visited, some 3 million to 4 million Poles, mostly Jews, were done to death in circumstances which are quite impossible to describe, though I will try.
I have been there and it is a concentration camp stretching in all directions. One particular part I visited was where the extermination took place in rather a slow manner. The people were herded into a series of bunks about six feet by six feet, and eight to ten people slept there each night. When it was cold weather there was one brazier with one pail of coal to keep the place warm, The sheds were about the length of this Chamber and when the winter was on, they opened the windows in order to make them quite cold. When the summer and the hot weather came, they kept the windows on the top of the shed shut in order to make it more horrible. In the male urinals there was no water, which added to the unpleasant smell, and in a shed about as long as a cricket pitch where the water was running 10,000 people had to wash in an hour. This will give the House some idea of the impossible task set to the people who were living in this camp 557 and none of them, of course, survived more than three months. This is something relevant to the question of how Germany is regarded in other parts of Europe outside this country and that is why I mention these facts.
The next part was the gas chamber. I saw the place where the trains came in. If a German officer were killed in Warsaw 200 people, including children, were picked up and taken to Auschwitz concentration camp. There was there a large ferro-concrete building and the people were herded into it. They were offered a towel and a piece of soap. They thought they were going to have a bath with the result that they took off their clothes, but they found they were not to have a bath. Instead, they were shoved into the gas chamber and in ten minutes they were dead. They were taken out of the gas chamber and examined by dental surgeons, who extracted any gold in their teeth to build up Hitler’s gold reserve. If any hon. Member has been to Hamburg he will have seen hundreds and thousands of rings in that city, the owners of which cannot be traced.
These bodies were burned in the furnaces and this was going on at the rate of 15,000 to 35,000 a day. There is no question about this as we have had evidence given by General Hesse—not the man who came over here—and he admitted that he gave orders and knew that 3 million people were done to death in that camp. Since then more records have come to light and the figure is nearer 3½ to 4 million, as I have said. Apart from that, those bodies which could not be burned in the furnaces were burned on large piles which were set alight with oil and petrol. I understand it could be smelt many miles away. I saw human bones, about the size of the nail on one’s finger, on the floor of the building where people had been burned to death. Then to my horror—and I think the House will agree with me—I saw one or two charabancs coming into the camp with girls between 13 and 18 years of age who were sight-seeing. When I went back to Warsaw I protested to Ministers—whose names the House will forgive me for not mentioning—and I told them that this would be intolerable in England. One Minister said, “You must understand that we cannot let our people forget.” I said, “You are a Communist,” and he 558 said, “Yes, we are Communists but we can’t forgive the Germans about this.” I said, “If Germany becomes Communist would you feel the same?” and he answered, “If it were a Communist Germany perhaps we would have a little more kindness.” The real answer is that the Poles are Poles first and Communists and Socialists next, but they are Poles, and, remembering their history, the House would do well to make some allowance for the. point of view of these people.
And they were of a similar age.