Earthlinggb's Blog

U.N. inadvertently confirms “Freeman” concept

Posted in Law, The Corrupt SOB's by earthlinggb on October 22, 2011

THANK YOU U.N. YOU COULD NOT BE MORE CLEAR!

[I’ve noticed another surge in views of this blog entry particularly from “Godlikeproductions”. I have read all the new comments and can I just say, with every respect, some of you are getting bogged down in minutiae, missing the point and starting to talk as if “what do we do without law?” This blog is NOT about having no law, it is simply about the absolute admission by the UN – and therefore all bodies underneath it including ALL governments – that STATUTORY LAW is what we know it to be and that they use that law purely for the basis of increasing every control on society. People en masse, then understanding this, could and would have a perfectly formed argument together to attack the very basis of STATUTORY laws. There would be no need to approach it all with all the other freemen arguments which they shall evade and make changes in law to evade. You attack the very fundamental issue and you demand COMMON LAW. But it needs a mass of people to understand and work together to create the voice needed. Nothing needs done by force just force of will and concrete proof. I have given you the proof.]

This is not, in any way, a “quick fix” for just a few people to take on the system. What it is, is a factual, verified, “report” on what it is and how it is that the present system uses the legal fiction known as the “person” to totally control a life (and a corporate life) from birth to death. Due to ignorance within a democracy, there is no way of any one person (I should say, human) taking on this system and winning with this absolute, proven, verified logic. Verified, no less than by the U.N. itself – it is, in fact, manipulation and control hidden in clear sight. Article 6 of the U.N Declaration of Human Rights actually destroys their entire construct where itself, it states what I show on the following blog. Please read this blog also and simply work through the logic. I assure you, there is not one legal Barrister, judge or lawyer who can argue against this logic. Logic is NOT what the legal world works on because, if it did, it would simply fall apart. https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/11/24/the-human-rights-act-deception-2/

I have seen this blogpost now go viral and have read many comments on it from various other blogsites. Many people are speaking about the dangers of leaving the system and also the benefits of having no Birth registration. I would, therefore, ask the reader to read very carefully what is being said because, in fact, there is no need to leave the system. There is no need for having no birth certificate and having no conferred benefits. There is only ONE need to be stated ON the birth certificate to “kill” the issue of the state and the legal UN articles which are corrupt and deceptive. That statement is provided as an addendum at the bottom. It is simple and entirely effective but ONLY when the human race understands what has occured. We live in this “democracy” (and to the US reader, democracy was NEVER what your founders intended) which deems that the majority rule. If the majority are ignorant and uneducated about what is written here and are unable to grasp the reality and logic of it, then we will never get the mass of people to demand the statement – and what it means – to be inserted.

However, there is one other point I wish to make: OWS need to understand this because this is at the heart of everything. If they do not understand this then they are throwing rocks at a machine and the machine will prevail.

I have been studying this issue for some time now and while I have to state I do not perceive myself as a “Freeman” simply because I do not align with any particular movement, I have, in the past few years, been compelled to look at what it is that gives an entirely corrupt government and judiciary (and it is I can assure you) the “power” to consider themselves the authority by which they can introduce any and all “law” that they wish which, many times, impinges upon personal freedoms from freedom of speech to smoking to how fast you drive your car to coercing you to pay taxes. Let me explain in a short couple of sentences why I took this path:

I went before a court which I then proved, a year or two later, never had jurisdiction in a case. According to THEIR own law, there were two conditions, either one of which which would allow their jurisdiction and neither one was satisfied by either party and the COURT AND LAWYERS knew this all along! They didn’t care but became incensed I found out and decided to coerce me at Supreme court level. I have all the proof of this and, at the time, I gave it to the British government (FCO). I received a letter from Meg Munn saying they would do nothing for me even though it was a direct assault on my human rights. This court was going to jail me (with no record and based upon “contempt because I exposed their corruption in court) for a second time unless I handed over my ENTIRE wealth to the other party (even though I proved to the court via 5 years of bank statements that the other party had stolen £35,000 from me, which they accepted but didn’t care – the other party had the children). I had advised my lawyer to go into court and strike the whole proceedings and while he accepted that I was right, he refused to do so because it would embarrass HIM AND embarrass the COURT. He obviously had words with the opposition lawyer about my findings and with the court and it was, at that point, the coercion began. I was to “negotiate and do a deal” with the other party who had perjured themselves in court and in affidavits over and over again (seen and accepted by the court but ignored) otherwise I was going to jail again for not abiding with a court order which, I had proven, was based upon false evidence. The FCO, then, were going to allow another court to abuse my human rights when it is their stated principle to uphold the human rights of every UK citizen. Why were they willing to do this? The excuse was because they could not interfere in another sovereign nation’s legal system. I hope you realise what a joke this is! It all depends upon which country’s legal system they are being asked to interfere with. If it is Syria’s or Sudan’s (and THEY are sovereign nations) then it’s ok. If it is a country accepted by the west (which it was) then no, they won’t. The hypocrisy and corruption is so obvious to me now. It ended then, with me literally running for my life (I know it sounds dramatic but it is fact), jumping on a plane back to UK and finishing the whole thing off in the Royal Courts of Justice. Faced by a lawyer and barrister who laughed when I entered court saying I was representing myself. They were not laughing at the end of the day however when I explained the entire jurisdiction issue. The barrister had written to the court in England saying they had jurisdiction to hear the case because the two parties were domicile in England. When I pointed out to him that the other party was asking the court to uphold the other country’s court order which had assumed jurisdiction being held in the other country based upon DOMICILITY there, the barrister realised he was whipped! Here is where it gets interesting: The result was that, in absolute fact, the other party to the case is now an unrecognised bigamist. That is what our “law” allows!

“Domicile” and why that Barrister shit himself: set15

But then that Barrister, himself, broke the law by not advising the Court (The Royal Courts of Justice indeed) that the overseas proceedings were entirely null and void and that, now with re-marriage, the other party is a bigamist because the original divorce was illegal! Nice eh? :-)

During all of this, the other party demonised me to my kids who were only 10 and 12 when it started. They still don’t seem to understand the incredible lies the other party has told them (and the Singapore court) and that now, the man the other party is “married” to is, of course, the same man they were told was “just a friend”.

Two daughters, who are now nearly 20 and 18 and they despise me because I only have one way to show them their father didn’t ever lie to them and that is by showing them the lies of their mother which creates their impressions of me. But then, you don’t win because the last thing these girls wish to do is admit to themselves that they can see these lies. I’ve lost almost a decade of a relationship with my own kids and no matter I can prove every single last element of perjury and brainwashing of them by the other party, the law doesn’t give a damn.

So, back to the issue:

It would seem strange that the U.N. itself could possibly confirm something as “bizarre” as a Freeman concept, I agree, but one only needs to read the following and, hopefully, if you have a logical mind, you will appreciate it quite clearly.

The U.N. states:

“Registration means proof of legal identity. It is vital for securing recognition before the law, protecting rights such as inheritance and making children less vulnerable to abuse and exploitation.”

“Under international law then, every child is entitled to registration of their birth, including children born to irregular migrants.”

20-22.pdf

Now, please consider carefully, the word “entitled” above. It would sound like an offer, a choice wouldn’t it? “You are entitled to such and such if you so choose to accept”. But the reality is that, in each state/country, you HAVE no choice. The State will punish ANY parent who, on your behalf as a baby, does not wish to CONTRACT with the state. The State’s propaganda machine, however, is great and the ignorant populace will be led to believe you are, somehow, abusing your child. They will say “we cannot confer benefits on this child because LEGALLY, it does not exist” Therefore, you as a parent will be demonized.

Again, directly from the U.N.

“The child who is not registered at birth is in danger of being shut out of society – denied the right to an official identity, a recognized name and a nationality. In 2000, an estimated 50 million babies – more than two fifths of those born – were unregistered. These children have no birth certificate, the ‘membership card’ for society that should open the door to the enjoyment of a whole range of other rights including education and health care, participation and protection.
This Digest examines the situation of children who are denied a fundamental human right and who, in legal terms, do not exist”.

UNCF Innocent Digest No.9 March 2002:  birthregistration_Digestenglish.pdf

So there you have it in the UN’s own PLAIN language: In LEGAL TERMS they don’t exist. IF then, in legal terms, they do not exist then, by definition, the legal world can have NO AUTHORITY over them. They are EXPLICITLY saying this. There is no room for misinterpretation. It is precise. The UN and legal world spell out the ADVANTAGES of having a birth certificate (all the benefits) but not the DISADVANTAGES which they trust you will not even begin to consider.

“The value of birth registration continues to be overlooked, according
to the report. It says that registration is a critical measure to
secure the recognition of every person before the law, to safeguard
the protection of his or her individual rights, and to ensure that
any violation of these rights does not go unnoticed.”

Child-rights@hrea.org: msg00069.html

“Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child. This paper emphasizes that, while a person’s name may be their most distinctive “mark” of individuality, additional information – such as age, family ties and nationality – promote the child’s right to legal protection by parents and by the state.”

“every child is entitled to State protection against exploitation and abuse. In the case of the unregistered child, however, he or she has no guaranteed protection of a specific national jurisdiction.”

“Birth registration is a permanent and official record of a child’s existence. It can be generally defined as the official recording of the birth of a child by some administrative level of the state and coordinated by a particular branch of government. Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child.

“Ideally, birth registration is part of an effective civil registration system that acknowledges the existence of a person before the law, establishes his or her family ties and tracks the major events of that individual’s life, from birth, to marriage and parenting, to death. A fully functional civil registration system should be compulsory, universal, permanent and compulsory.”

“A birth certificate is the most visible evidence of a government’s legal recognition of the existence of a child as a member of society.”

“In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, for example, Palestinians have been motivated to register their children in order to establish legal identity. On the basis of this registration, identity cards are issued which designate whether the child was born in Gaza, the West Bank or Jerusalem. This in turn establishes categories of the population subject to controlled mobility, leading to stigmatized treatment and additional discriminations.”

“….without a birth certificate it is difficult for an unregistered child, or that child’s family, to seek legal redress.”

“Experience from the field indicates that the registration of every child is a practicable possibility, even in challenging circumstances. To give just one striking example, in Afghanistan, between May and October 2003, a total of 775,000 children were successfully registered, representing 97 per cent of the target group of all girls and boys under one year of age. This was achieved using trained volunteers who accompanied polio vaccination teams as they made house-to-house visits to immunize young children.”

The entire document is very well worth a read but I think we get the picture very clearly Council of Europe.

3_WEB%20E%20Rep.%2012.pdf

Now, I am NOT suggesting that people should not register their child’s birth. No, no no. What I am saying is that EVERYONE should understand, from this, that the existing corrupt system – top to bottom – which allows some to “break the law” (such as elites, wealthy, corporations – who are considered ‘legal persons’) is using the registration of your birth – WHICH IS ACTUALLY A TRUST SET UP BY YOU AND THE STATE WITH YOU AS SOLE BENEFICIARY, THEREFORE, YOU and ONLY YOU, dictate how that trust operates and what its “laws” are – uses it AGAINST YOU where and when it sees fit. And they will and DO use it corruptly particularly if you prove to be an “annoyance” to them.. You have to understand that statute law (the legal world) requires consent and they ASSUME you have given them consent to act ‘on your behalf’ because you have been REGISTERED with the state – just as you register your car and the state (DVLA) has been given authority by YOU to tow away your car – which then allows them to ACT upon your person in accordance with ANY and ALL statutes that they see fit. But this is in YOUR IGNORANCE of how this deception works.

By registration of your child, you have entered – and entered them – into a contract with the state which SUBBROGATES their inherent, god given, human rights which are UNALIENABLE – UNLESS you subbrogate them! This has been done deceptively, fraudulently because, as with ALL CONTRACTS, one must be afforded FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE TERMS. YOU WERE NOT GIVEN FULL DISCLOSURE OF WHAT THE RESULTS OF YOUR ACTIONS WERE BY REGISTERING THE BIRTH!

“Let he who allows himself to be deceived, be deceived”

So consider this because this is the result of the population’s ignorance regarding how the birth cerificate and REGISTRATION of your child is actually used against you. You give the state the power and authority to remove your child from you in precisely the same way you give the DVLA power and authority to remove your car:

The bottom line is this: While it is right that all children should live in safety, be registered, be confered the benefits of society – education, the necessities to operate in the world etc. The states are using “carrots” of benefits (which, in fact, as we are seeing are a huge cost to each individual in society because, as you know, being part of that society and a taxpayer for instance, has you liable for the losses of the banks) to ensure you register your child and hand authority to the state which then allows the state to use the legal system against you. Before you transferred authority to the state, your child (and you) had unalienable rights bestowed only by God. You were a completely free human being only limited by the true law (no harm, injury or loss to another human being). Since contracting and registering for all those “benefits”, the LAW SOCIETY, on behalf of the State, has removed, deceptively, all power from you and DO NOT, in fact, bestow upon you, the man or woman, human rights because you already HAVE rights which can never been taken from you AS a man or woman. Neither does the state abuse your unalienable rights because you have effectively transfered the authority to them to act upon your LEGAL PERSON. You have created a LEGAL PERSON. A LEGAL FICTION with which you play in the “game of life” like the piece you use in monopoly. That piece is not YOU but you control the piece and if you did not have it you would not be able to play the game. That is PRECISELY how your Birth Certificate (Registration with the state) is being used. That is your game piece in the game of life and it is being deceptively used against you.

So what is the solution? Have no birth certificate?

No. The solution is that we put the State on notice that we now appreciate what they have been and are doing and we advise them, very clearly, that it is fraud and deception on their part and we are now taking control over our trusts. The registration of your birth created a trust (even though you nor your parents thought of this or considered it, you just did what everyone has done). The TRUSTEES of that trust are the public servants. Public servants serve the PUBLIC. YOU are the public and the Judge, Police, government are YOUR servants. GOD KNOWS they do not wish you to understand this but I think the above makes it quite clear.

They treat YOU as a trustee in YOUR ignorance. You are NOT the trustee, you are the BENEFICIARY of that trust and as such, only YOU can appoint the administrator of it. The Judge is acting as administrator in your ignorance. YOU need to advise him/her that he/she is WRONG.

The U.N. has given you absolute confirmation here that it is the birth certificate and ONLY the birth certificate which creates a legal personality which the legal world can recognise an act upon. If they cannot confer benefits on you because you are not recognised legally, then they cannot POSSIBLY argue that they can hold you to legal statute law. Common law yes – absolutely. No harm, injury or loss and there MUST be an injured party. But other than that, they have NO authority over you.

THIS IS WHERE FREEDOM AND TRUTH BEGINS. THIS IS NOT ABOUT HAVING THE ABILITY TO BREAK THE COMMON LAW. THIS IS NOT ABOUT HAVING THE ABILITY TO CAUSE HARM, INJURY OR LOSS. THIS IS ABOUT REMOVING THE SUBBROGATION OF YOUR RIGHTS BY A CORRUPT SYSTEM WHICH IS ABUSING ITS POWER.

Now, here is another interesting comment in the UN digest document:

 “Similarly, an unregistered child is unlikely to be able to obtain social protection from the state. In Israel, the fact that many Palestinian children born in camps are unregistered seriously jeopardizes their access to Israeli public health and welfare services”.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so sick!

WHAT DOES YOUR ZIONIST/JEWISH VALUES SAY ABOUT THIS CAMERON? “It’s ok the kid had no birth certificate so didn’t exist”?

Consider this seriously for a moment: Is it possible that, due to the lack of legal recognition and, as the UN has stated, these children DO NOT LEGALLY EXIST, that to massacre such children AND adults is no crime at all legally?

DO NOT THINK THIS IS A FLIPPANT REMARK!

Think about this. HOW does a Palestinian child (or parent) or a person from a country or region (think native peoples – Papua New Guinea etc) bring a charge of murder or genocide or any charges into a court of law if they have no STANDING because they have no birth certificate therefore, no legal identity? How does a people then find justice? Answer: THEY DON’T. There IS no other mechanism.

So think of the massacre of native American Indians by those who stole their land. Those who stole the land were recognised in “law” as existing. They HAD birth certificates. The British system would, therefore, consider these “savages” as non-existent. If they did not exist in law then they both, could not be confered benefits NOR would anyone miss them or be able to act LEGALLY on their behalf. So, we massacred nobodies. In legal terms IT DID NOT HAPPEN! THINK about that!

But here’s another thing: While the UN and the state say you cannot be given any benefits – and let’s take health and medicine for a moment shall we? – if you do not have a birth certificate and therefore, do not exist. DO YOU THINK FOR ONE MOMENT THAT, IN PALESTINE AND ELSEWHERE, THESE CHILDREN AND ADULTS ARE EVER TURNED AWAY FROM HOSPITALS WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF NATO or AMERICAN/BRITISH or ISRAELI BOMBS? DO YOU?

So then you tell me? WHO is the most humane? Those who would turn their backs on their people because they LEGALLY DO NOT EXIST such as that which the UN and western states subscribe to? Or those who see a human being suffering and the LAST thing they think about is “Do you have a birth certificate?” and “Do you have enough of these “bills of exchange” to pay to live? Quite literally then, the western idea is of having a Health service which acts as a “Highwayman” – “Your money or your life!”

To further point to the seriousness of that earlier remark think of slavery. Think of American Black slavery. They were not recognised as people with rights BUT, while all that changed and they were then conferred benefits of statehood, allowed passports, “given” rights through their registration, do you think for one moment that the same group of elitist psychopaths were going to make everyone equal?

“We have stricken the (slave) shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level not so much by the elevation of former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by an iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.”
– Horace Greeley – (1811-1872) founder of the New York Tribune

No. They then used and abused the system of registration which they “wrap up in ribbons” with nationality and passports and driving licences, education, health etc while, quietly they are using it to tax you, to fine you and to suck the wealth from humanity deceptively.

“The money power denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.”
– Democrat Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan.

They STILL have their slaves because they set the system up to ensure it.

So Morgan, if you ever stumble across this, give it some thought!

Morgan Freeman: The blacks achieved their freedom? No, they were just added to the “herd”.

ADDENDUM 8th Nov 2011:

While I understand fully, people suggesting such as “bringing the system down” etc in their heartfelt anger about this massive con on the human race – and it is – I do not believe in bringing the system down because it would simply result in an unholy war and millions of deaths. For what?

The “system” has been built by us. The system is actually, basically fine. What is wrong is the corruption of that system by nothing more or less than the manipulation of law by those who hold the wealth which they have accumulated across centuries by ensuring the corruption of the system. It is necessary to expose and destroy (peacefully) these people’s grip on humanity by their having bought politicians and governments to install the legislation they have wanted for the purposes of societal control.

Specifically with regard to the birth registration issue. It is easily dealt with. The solution is:

“In signing this birth certificate as a RECORD of birth ONLY, I, as sole beneficiary of this trust, do not subrogate any and all god given rights of the child”

And for my atheist friends, of which I could be considered one, do not get caught up and pedantic by the use of the term “god given”. Whether you see them as god given or not, you surely understand you have, and should have, unlimited rights fom the moment you are born. Please read the supporting comments to this which were written over two centuries ago by Thomas Paine within his book “Rights of man”. You can find the link to the post on the right hand side column.

Colonel Edward Mandell-House:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.

They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the
bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.

The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our
dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

– Letter from Rothschild Agent Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921] found in Wilson’s personal diary/logs

I take no quote as being a fact unless it can be supported by source documents (as is the UN statement herein). So I cannot claim to know the certainty of the above quote which has been published widely across the internet. If anyone can confirm by way of providing a copy of the original source (Woodrow Wilson’s diaries) then such would be quite an incredible find which goes even further (if further were needed) to confirm the content of this post. However, I must add that, while I recognise the extreme arrogance of these people in what others have said, which have been solidly confirmed, I find it difficult to believe that anyone would be QUITE so arrogant and, frankly, stupid, to write such as this in a letter to the President of the United States. If this were to be proven as factual, then these people are even more stupid than I give them credit for!

I cannot access this to check. Perhaps someone else can or find the source document elsewhere:  papers

ADDENDUM 30th November 2011:

Once this entire issue is grasped by the reader then, like me, you will probably find that you stumble across so many things which just verify it over and over (if such were needed). For instance, the Thomas Paine book I stumbled over just a few days after writing this initial blogpost. Now, today, this interesting (largely forgotten and much unused word) element came to my attention. Again I am not stating that this particular explanation is factual and entirely relevant. I am only adding it from the perspective that I find it very interesting. It does not subtract from the facts presented above re the entire birth certificate issue. –

Origin of terms ‘Negro’ and Afrika

By Dr. Kwame Nantambu January 09, 2007
According to Anthony T. Browder in From ‘The Browder File: 22 Essays on the African-American Experience’ (2000), “…the Portuguese were the first to enslave Afrikans and they were the first to call them Negroes. When the Spanish became involved in the slave trade, they also used the word Negro to describe Afrikans. Negro is an adjective which means Black in Portuguese and Spanish. But since 1444 and the beginning of the slave  trade, the adjective Negro became a noun and the legitimate name of a  newly enslaved people.” (p.1).
The fact of the matter is that under Euro-centrism, “…the word for Black was typically associated with aspects of death. The word death is derived from the Greek word Necro which means dead and is similar in sound and meaning to the word Negro.”
As part of “the manifestation of the evil genius of Europe,” Euro-centric thought process deceitfully juxtaposed the words “Necro” and “Negro”. “…to reference the physical, spiritual or mental death of a person, place or thing.” (Ibid).

0901.htm

I trust you recognise how this fits in precisely with the above discussion re the benefits and emancipation of blacks once they were legally recognised by the state. They then LEGALLY existed whereas, beforehand, they were “negro”, DEAD. They were effectively dead due to their non legal existence! It then became unacceptable AND illegal to use the term “nigger” and/or “negro” because, effectively, they were no longer such! A good thing you would say (and anyone would agree) BUT, as you already have read, it was anything but emancipation. If anything, they were promoted to “debt slave” like the rest of us rather than “dead slave”.

Here is another aspect of the control the birth certificate creating the “legal person” has over you. It’s called creating a taxpayer:

Additionally, here is my confrontation with a British MP whom I “educated” (not that he needed it) on the entire legal person issue. Of course, you will see he freaked out at being on camera. It’s not a controlled environment like the BBC you see. The BBC will never ask such questions and put such points to these people (for obvious reasons i hope you are aware).

Damian was very camera shy. Can you tell? Good name for an MP by the way!

About these ads

39 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. prasutagus said, on October 23, 2011 at 7:06 am

    Helpful snippit from the UN, thank you, feeling your passion in this and respect for your courage to speak it.

  2. Spaz said, on November 8, 2011 at 5:11 am

    Yes, if you register a child with the state, it becomes the state’s child. It’s high time for parents to reclaim their children – but you are missing 2 key elements to this scenario.

    1. If the child is the product of a legally married couple, the ‘license’ they applied for effectively gave the state a 1/3 party interest in the marriage. This includes all ‘property’ conceived. This means not only your financial interests but your child(ren).

    EXPLANATION: A marriage license is a Secular Contract between the parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal, and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract.

    2. Hospitals are Ports of Entry. If you birth your child in a hospital, it is not considered American soil and not subject to constitutional rights. All newborns in a hospital are considered alien.

    EXPLANATION: 22 CFR 40.1[Title 22; Foreign Relations; Chapter I; Department of State; Subchapter E; Visas; Part 40; Regulations PERTAINING TO BOTH NONIMMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended; Subpart A; General Provisions], PORT OF ENTRY MEANS A PORT OR PLACE DESIGNATED BY THE DHS (Department Of Homeland Security) AT WHICH AN ALIEN MAY APPLY TO DHS FOR ADMISSION INTO THE UNITED STATES.

    [from birth] If mom and/or dad put their signature on a state issued birth certificate, they effectively handed their child over as state property.

    EXPLANATION: 1933, the birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is on file in the official records in Washington, D.C. And the property and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt.

    • earthlinggb said, on November 8, 2011 at 7:22 pm

      Thanks for the input Spaz. One thing, however, while you are absolutely correct that that legally married couple would give the state a 1/3rd party interest (and, of course, the state has an interest in the actual marriage itself because it administers it if, for example, there is a divorce – a wonderfully huge source of income for the state through the legal system as is so many other legal crimes, infractions etc) but I’d ask the question Why would a couple licence the state in the first place to marry them legally IF they have already understood the issue with the birth certificate of their own? If this couple, as children, had parents who had stated as I suggest in the addendum, then the same would apply to ANY and ALL registrations with the state. A marrying couple would, once more, have the same statement within their marriage certificate. They would NOT consider it a “licence”. A LICENCE? To love someone and join together as a couple? The state provides you with a LICENCE to do this? The state determines who and who cannot marry and love each other? Such as many will not provide a licence for LGBT couples. LGBT is not my most favoured of society but that is just MY personal opinion. I have and should not have ANY control over what people wish to do or how they live their lives as long as it is within the common law principles of no harm, injury or loss.
      So, appreciate what you are saying and it is correct, it is just I would anticipate the reader to extrapolate from the text of the blog and see all the permutations for themselves. They are almost inexhaustive because it is the birth certificate and the ongoing “licence” applied to people that is the entire issue fundamentally. You can apply it to just about anything therefore. Tax? You only pay tax because you are legally required to do so. You are legally recognised through your having a birth certificate. IF, however, we add the addendum statement to that birth certificate then the international bankers who have the countries in bankruptcy, cannot touch you legally because you are not contracting with the state legally when you do not agree to subrogate your god given rights. It makes the birth certificate nothing more than what it should be – a record NOT a contract.

  3. Barry Lee said, on November 8, 2011 at 5:28 am

    This is so powerful!!! Thank you so very much for posting this vial information.

    • earthlinggb said, on November 8, 2011 at 7:25 pm

      Cheers Barry. Glad you and many others seem to be grasping it. All I want to see is people with the lightbulbs switching on.

  4. Juan Carlos Gonzalez said, on November 8, 2011 at 5:34 am

    I have been looking into this whole “freeman”, sovereignty” issue for about three years now….even as young as 16-17 yrs old… I thought that our government had taken people and made them more like corporations and corporations more like people….I’m 32 now…….after stumbling upon these concepts and reading court cases/rulings…and listening to guys like Robert Menard, Jordan Maxwell, Winston Shroud…I see what is basically going on here…..I instantly knew that this stuff was all true…I try to spread the word…some just say hmmm…..some people a little older than me think…it don’t “sound” right…lol…probably think I don’t know what I’m talking about…this guy I worked with…Jeff…told me I was naive…lol..and “do you believe everything you see on the internet ?”…lol…of course not…total insult to my intelligence…anyways….he told me I couldn’t read the “law”…I’ve heard “officials” say that stuff before…liars..lol…This with the United Nations is just one more thing to show the point that this is the way it goes…the whole system is a scam….by the way…asked a off duty sheriff “If you register your car are you not creating two owners, one being the State of Ohio ?”…he paused and said ……yes….i already knew it was true…just wanted to see what he said…lol….told the jeff guy about it…he said the sheriff….”he must not know what he’s talking about”…lol…some people….it’s so hard to teach people something they thought they already knew…lol…keep it up people this is what some of us are awaking to, we will be a new educated force for governments around the world too reckon with….freedom is a concept in the hearts and minds of men…from all places…all backgrounds…these are my new found brothers..and I theirs.

  5. Stop Debt (@End_Debt) said, on November 8, 2011 at 11:23 am

    PLACE YOUR SHARE BUTTONS NOW!

  6. Darren 'BigD' Groves said, on November 8, 2011 at 11:30 am

    These are VERY real concepts , deliberately kept above the heads of the public as it is the very weapon ( possibly the sole weapon ) we have to bring down the system.

    Once we recognise and separate our legal fictions from the idea of ‘us’ we are virtually untouchable by the contract-reliant Admiralty courts and statutes that confine us. Under the one proviso , WE KEEP COMMON LAW !!!

    • earthlinggb said, on November 8, 2011 at 7:29 pm

      We don’t need to destroy it Darren. It just needs fixed. Easily done when we all appreciate what they’ve done. Until such times as the majority understand it, however, well we live in a “democracy” where the majority rule yet are ignorant of this. An ignorant majority is where the danger lies and with whom these elite depend to remain ignorant.

  7. Bodge said, on November 8, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    I have been following the “freeman movement” for some time and all I have seen is people trying to find a way out of being in trouble. This is a “game changer” of information and I fully intend to teach this to mine. At last a properly written account of the fraud committed by these elitists and its about time we put this right, I can see dark days ahead, its not going to be easy to fight the “system” because it does not want to be fought with, it would rather bury you in legislation believing itself to be right. I can feel a fight coming on and now I have an argument and remain “in honour” whilst the system does not really have any.

  8. Bosco Warden said, on November 8, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    ……Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

  9. dave said, on November 9, 2011 at 2:17 am

    If legislation is what you want to avoid, don’t worry, be happy, JAH, has done it for you
    http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm
    all british colonies can use this in court to avoid illegal legislation according to JAH who won the court case

    freeman

  10. Terence Karkabe said, on November 9, 2011 at 4:35 pm

    ok that works for our children 0 what about we who are already contractually obligated – how do we opt out ot said contract?

    • earthlinggb said, on November 9, 2011 at 5:23 pm

      It’s the same for all Terence because, until the majority get to grips with this and then we start putting in this clause to all birth documents, it won’t work for anyone because the majority’s ignorance will carry on allowing the state to do this. However, if and when the majority DO understand it, then we can create a law retrospectively for all people’s registration. Once socirty wakes up to this fundamental con, there would be no stopping this. Thanks for the input.

    • Walt said, on November 26, 2011 at 5:27 pm

      I’ve posted a reply that answeres your question, hope you ticked post notification.

      Walt

  11. Walt said, on November 26, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    To counteract “their” claim of authority over you. All you need do is fully learn and understand how to be the Occupier of the office of the Executotor for the Birth Certificate ALL CAPS NAME, Estate. For that is what it is, it’s not just a trust, it is an estate with you as the beneficiary and as the beneficiary you are both lawfuly and legally entitled to occupy that office. As the Lawful occupier of the office of the Executor (rememnber not to claim your the Eaxecutor or that it’s your estate, it’s not yours, it’s theirs, claiming it’s your would make you a trustee and trustees are liable. You only occupy an abandond office, you were never appointed) you administrate this estate and if they attempt anything you simply demand to know by what authority they claim the right to administrate? They are not warrented by your office so they have none and you thereby adjourn their fruadulent claim to administrate this estate. for more see David Clarence start here:
    http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Misc-Talkshoe-Calls-Extra-Information.html#anchor_316

  12. Richard David Dellerman said, on November 28, 2011 at 1:38 am

    A town in a State would not pay a Federal Tax because it was not a chartered ‘Burg’ to the State. They had to pay the Fed. tax because all gains of property from the Chartered Corporate State’s perimeter belongs to the State, that is, even if the town does not have a Chartered (agreement) to the Chartered Corporate State.
    Sincerely, Richard David dellerman, 27 November 2011

    • earthlinggb said, on November 28, 2011 at 2:06 am

      Which town and which state Richard? And is there a copy of the legal proceedings explaining precisely the issue? It may not be chartered to the state but they may be using another legal reason to have it pay the federal tax. Who owns the land? What type of tax does a state pay? (I am not American so I am not au fait with all of this state taxes). Who are the people who own the land in that town and what type of ownership do they have in their land?

      • Richard David Dellerman said, on November 30, 2011 at 12:42 am

        The many Laws and Regulations of a Corporate State Chartered to their Corporate Federal Government Chartered to its U.N.’s world managers as the International Corporations’ CEOs Board members of the World Bank and World Organizations such as the World Trade Organization, World Health Organization, World Education Organization and over 30 more that has integrated them selves into the national governments abroad -only consider Regulations that they wish to present for their own gain.

        A Corporation (read definition) is a business that owns all its authorized -by lawful Chartered agreement- property and its gains and losses be it timber, water resources, buildings, and laborers. For a citizen to use the Chartered Corporation’s property as land, house, vehicle, children, and to get married, they have to get a Certificate, Permit or a License or else it can become a crime not to have one and can be fined or put in jail. The written Laws are usually not recognized by the Court System because the Court System (government) is not under these Laws. The citizens are but the citizen in a Court as a Jury is subordinate to the Judge’s decision in his government’s territory of the “Bench”!

        All people know they must pay money to their Corporate Government when being told to do so. But even the Corporate Government has a foreign Corporation called the IRS to get (Tax) money from the citizens of a specific Chartered Corporation. That in itself is against the USA Laws {Piracy Act} but the USA will still send their citizen Police to take Arms against the non Tax Payer!

        A Chartered town, city, or State is considered a “burg” identifying it to be as a Burgher System of government. The previous explanation describes how this Judicial System functions.

  13. Shifu A. Careaga said, on November 28, 2011 at 7:53 am

    Freedom doesn’t come from paper. If you wan tit written down it can be as easily taken away. Freedom is born of the mind. Physical freedom – of the body – is ensured by preparedness, whether that be a gun or just knowledge. People are massacred not because they lack legality. They are massacred because they have no power to ensure their freedom and their enemies are likewise not free or they would not worry about harming others.

    If you want freedom, teach the people to find freedom within. Then all the details are superfluous – interesting, but totally a luxury.
    ————–
    I highly recommend starting with marital arts practice. If you can get past the whole “MA is for fighting” mind-frame it will really change you. I also recommend herbal remedies because certain energy deficiencies in the body or mind can lead to paranoia and feelings of persecution; which of course deny you inner freedom without an external cause. Just some side thoughts here. I know plenty of people not at all persecuted but seem to feel that way. (I mean more persecuted than being tax-slaves and cash cows as we all are, of course.)

    • earthlinggb said, on December 3, 2011 at 7:37 pm

      Action based upon logic and natural law can overcome it. The ONLY response to it is then force and if they wish to show their hand by using such then so be it. The problem then is that they do not show their hand because they use secret courts, in camera proceedings and advise the public that certain proceedings are “not in the Public interest”. We must break that and show that for what it is before we can then present these arguments (which are killer arguments) to the general public by way of legal proceedings. The logic would have a jury speechless.

  14. cooeerup said, on November 29, 2011 at 8:04 am

    I wrote to the Woodrow Wilson Library for help re the letter you posted from House to Wilson. I have science read them and downloaded some interesting snippets from the archives. I did not see the letter, which of course doesn’t necessarily mean anything. What I did get is a sense of the tone of the relationship between them and it seems to me that House was almost sychophanitic in his tone, constantly gushing compliments and grovelling with gratitude that the President paid him attention. I think this may have been to manipulate the President as there were some letters between House and others and visa versa that talked in a sort of code about things they had discussed previously in person or on the phone. Hence, my conclusion is this letter you posted is a fake because I cannot see this conspirator tone and secret sharing occurring anywhere else in their correspondences, but I can see it between House and others. if you would like me to email you the documents you have my email so drop my a line and I will forward them to you.

  15. Mosean said, on November 30, 2011 at 12:22 am

    Resonant article! Just Inquiring what the procedure is when we add the addendum statement to the birth certificate, if it requires any sort of a notary signature to officiate it!?!

    • earthlinggb said, on December 3, 2011 at 7:32 pm

      The problem lies with “democracy” Mosean. While what you suggest would be entirely lawful (and legal) and a notary signature would definitely help, the notary him/herself would probably be totally unaware of what it was you were doing. You see, in our democracy (majority rule) if the majority is ignorant of their “prison” they will allow it to continue and people like you or I who see it for what it is will be forced to comply by this majority. The State and the “Law” recognise this and use it to their advantage. It needs to be entirely understood by the majority before it will ever work. I fully intend on using it however, in all my dealings with “law” if it comes to that. Such an argument can only be shut down by force because they do not possess the logic and truth to overcome these facts.

  16. deimus | Pearltrees said, on December 28, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    […] U.N. inadvertently confirms “Freeman” concept « Earthlinggb's Blog Now, please consider carefully, the word “entitled” above. […]

  17. Gail said, on February 27, 2012 at 2:13 pm

    This is an excellent post, it’s very clear and non threatening, thank you so much…let’s keep sharing it :))

  18. […] PLEASE READ THIS:  THE MATRIX AND THIS: The “NATURAL PERSON” and THE MATRIX THIS: U.N. INADVERTENTLY CONFIRMS “FREEMAN” CONCEPT AND THIS: DESTROYING THE MINDGAME! Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Tagged with: […]

  19. Mike said, on April 19, 2012 at 12:27 pm

    Thank you. I registered my son’s birth last year (2011) how do I go back and add an addendum? Also, can an addendum be added to my own Birth Certificate? I live in South Africa.

    • earthlinggb said, on April 19, 2012 at 9:54 pm

      Sorry Mike but I cannot give legal advice and neither would I advocate you, alone, do this. What I have pointed out requires the understanding of the world’s population en masse. If not then the mass’s ignorance of this would have you put in jail because in a “democracy” majority rules and if the majority are sheep listening to and just accepting government trash then they will point the finger at you for stepping out of line. The sheep like to remain within their “pen”.

      • Mike said, on June 4, 2013 at 7:32 am

        Thanks dude. I seriously doubt we’ll ever get to that point. Take SA for example where most of our population are uneducated to the point of illiteracy. Getting them to understand concepts like this is a stretch. Most of the planet is like this, a tinder box waiting to blow by anyone with the retorect to spark it off. Anyone like Hitler. And us few intellectual peace lovers who have their best interests at heart will become the scape goats. My only concern is to protect my wife and children.

        • earthlinggb said, on June 4, 2013 at 1:24 pm

          Yes Mike. That is the problem. Very much understood. Thanks for the comment.

  20. […] on earthlinggb.wordpress.com Share this:EmailTwitterLinkedInFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like […]

  21. Cathie said, on February 16, 2014 at 12:05 am

    “[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.

    They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the
    bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

    They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

    After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.

    The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our
    dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

    – Letter from Rothschild Agent Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President) This is from the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion!

    • earthlinggb said, on February 16, 2014 at 12:18 am

      Thanks Cathie. However, there is no proof of this letter to be found. I doubt the authenticity.

  22. Cathie said, on February 16, 2014 at 12:08 am

    “dummy” = A party who has no interest in a transaction, but participates to help achieve a legal goal. 2. A party who purchases property and holds legal title for another. Cf. STRAW MAN (3). ie/ Birth Certificate.

  23. machineX said, on March 25, 2014 at 12:34 am

    while all of this is very good info, it will do no good to “legally” fight it. trust me they are never going to legally admit to any wrong doing or change anything to give up their control. pretty much anyone who realizes that all governments are corrupt has at one point realized that all this “paper documents” are nothing but induced slavery on the population controlled by entities you have never known. as if that is not silly enough right? lol

    and if you give up all your paper documents, etc, etc, you will be moving into a tent in the woods. because you could never own anything like a house, land etc. because it requires a “contract” with the state that owns every goddamn thing around you.

    and guess what – those woods your squatting in…yep you guessed it. your trespassing buddy…risk going to state detention camps – JAIL.

    im sad to say that the only way all of this corruption and crimes against the population is going to end is through total non compliance – but then that will lead to martial law and war. which is exactly where we are going anyway just like the state wants.

    they have had thousands of years to perfect their chess game and cover all ends to where there is practically no 100% esacape from their matrix system

    harsh truth. cheers, thanks for the good read though. its still great info to understand for people that do not.

    • dellerman9090 said, on March 26, 2014 at 12:13 am

      The only way to avoid conflict with the government is not to be employed by them, that is, no government employment, for it is our own people as Police and Military doing harm to their own family and friends by carrying out orders given by their government employer!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 343 other followers

%d bloggers like this: