Earthlinggb's Blog

Earth’s gravity to fund President Trump’s wall!

Posted in Money, Politics, Science, The Corrupt SOB's by earthlinggb on September 24, 2017

Isaac Newton was a smart bloke but I’d bet he’d never, in a million years, think that his calculations wrt gravity would fund a border wall between the United States and Mexico.

I know, you can’t fathom it either (and neither could I until I thought about it). So here goes: After all, we all know the CIA, working for the deep state, does a lot of the importation of cocaine etc – just ask Bill and Hillary Clinton! After all, it was in Mena, Arkansas, while Bill was Governor, that a lot of the shit came in to airfields by CIA propellor craft. Or didn’t you know that?

So, with this in mind and the ongoing battle between Trump and Enrique Peña Nieto regarding who’s going to pay, a source close to Trump has leaked that the two corrupt Presidential bastards are finalizing an arrangement between them based on Earth’s gravity, latitude difference between Mexico City and Washington D.C and the price of cocaine.

Let me explain (bear in mind this is explosive yet very hushed up information. If the FBI and CIA knew I knew this, I’d be suicided ;-)):

The earth’s gravity is said to vary between poles along the lines of latitude on the globe. For some reason, in international trade, this difference is never taken into account when weighing goods transported from one region of the globe to another – odd when you really think about it.

Now, weight = mass x gravity. We all know that right? Well, it appears Enrique gave Donald a call and said “I’ll be happy to fund the wall for you if we can come to an arrangement regarding the price and weight of cocaine in the US market”. Donald was confused but Jared, his son in law, was all ears. He was confused too but, being jewish, he’ll listen to any old shite to make a buck. Except this wasn’t shite – it was coke! I suppose the same could apply to the export of manure but manure doesn’t exactly hold the same price tag as coke. You could wait until the cows come home for a manure deal to have the same impact (yes, thrown in deliberately as a pun!).

“The wall that President Trump has vowed to build along the U.S. border with Mexico could cost more than $21 billion, nearly twice the amount of previous estimates, according to an internal Homeland Security Department report that was obtained by Reuters.10 Feb 2017”

Enrique went on to explain that, while the coke being weighed in Mexico was a given and exact amount of kilograms, when weighed in Washington D.C., due to the local gravity effect, it would, effectively, weigh more so the US consumer was making on the deal quite significantly when one considered the tonnage that was transported over the border in a year. “Come on Senor Donald” said Nieto, “you amd I both know it’s a win win situation”. “No…eh…no…no I don’t. Jared, are you getting this?”. “Let him continue Donald…” said Jared while Ivanka lay on the sofa in the Oval office, filing her nails thinking “Thank God Jared’s a jew and not a muslim otherwise it wouldn’t be him with the male mutilated genitalia!” and reading her latest edition of Tatler.

“Ok…ok….I’m sending you a link by email. Have a look…” Enrique exclaimed somewhat exasperated. “Send it to my personal email server….. eh, no….I’m not a Clinton. Oh bugger! Send it to the Oval office fax machine…. no, no, you can’t do that either! Shit! Shit! Ummm…. Ah! Send it to my daughter’s email” replied Trump.

“What’s your daughter’s email?” asked Nieto.

“daddysprincessiskosher@yahoo.com”

“Ok. It’s on its way……. Got it?”

“Yup! Got it!”

I’ve been sent a copy of the document sent to Trump:

“Now Senor Donald…”, Nieto continued, “All the Cocaine which ends up in the United States makes its way through Mehico. You know that, I know that, everybody knows that. The people who control your CIA know that and are happy to continue that. I am also happy to continue it and I will ensure that the cartels are well regulated and the Mehican government makes a good profit from it. However, there is a disparity at the moment between how much we are making and how much we could be making and it is all due to that English bloke with the jewish first name (can’t say “christian name” can we when it’s obviously jewish), Isaac Newton. You see, in Mexico City, when we weigh the amount transported, due to local gravity conditions, us being nearer the equator, our value for the weight is different from yours. 1Kg of cocaine (mass) multiplied by our local gravity figure of 9.7791m/s2 is 9.7791N, whereas, weighed in Washington, with a local gravity of 9.8007m/s2, it is 9.8007N. You’re gaining 0.0216N of weight on every Kg!”

Local Gravity: Mexico City

Local Gravity: Washington D.C.

 

“You’ve lost me!” blurted Trump.

“Jared… at, let’s say, 100 tonnes of product streaming over your border every year – and that is a conservative figure and, being conservatives yourselves, you may appreciate this. 100 tonnes is 100 x 1000Kg = 100,000Kg. The price of 1gram of coke in the US is approximately $150. Now, take 0.0216N (or Kg) and multiply by 100,000 and you get 2160N or 2160Kg additional weight you’re presently receiving for nothing. That 2160Kg is 2,160,000 grams of coke at $150 per gram which is US$324,000,000. However, a fair estimate of the tonnage flowing into the U.S. per year is about 500 tonnes but let’s say 300 for the sake of argument. That’s just under US$1Billion per year we’re losing out on supplying your people’s demand for cocaine every single year. So here’s the deal: You guarantee me that you’ll increase the price on the streets of Washington and all over the U.S. to make up that shortfall so that your side maintains its profit while I increase the kickbacks to the Mehican government to the same value. I’ll then use that increased revenue to fund your wall, assuming a 25 year agreement – discretely of course and everyone’s happy. Well. except the coke sniffers across the States. Just another hidden tax though Senor Donald eh?”

“Brilliant…brilliant…. ahh well it sounds brilliant…Jared? What do you think?”

“It is brilliant Donald and I know just the guys who can ensure the price on the street meets Senor Mieto’s needs”.

“Ahhh Jared. When Ivanka told me you were her guy, I knew it. I knew she was a smart cookie. Owner of 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan and shagging my daughter PLUS, a jew. What more could I want?”

“That’s right Donald. Shalom Daddio!”

“So gentlemen…” continued President Nieto, “Let’s call it a ‘Trade deal under the cloak of National Security’, do we have a deal?”

Presidential Address by President Donald J Trump:

“To the people of this great nation of ours, under God, I want to tell you, President Nieto of Mexico and I are great friends… really GREAT friends… and the President has graciously agreed to fund the wall between our great nations because we are great nations and we not only are great friends but respect each other greatly and that is why we need to build this great wall. It will be a stupendous wall, a wall to out-wall any other wall, even Pink Floyd’s – great band by the way, even greater when Waters left… great great band and they had a great wall too. Even China…China has a great wall and so does Israel but OUR wall will be the greatest. So great, they say China’s can be seen from Earth orbit; Ours will be seen from Proxima Centauri it will be so so great!”

“Dear God! I told him not to say we’d pay! What the hell do I tell MY people now? exclaimed Nieto to Kushner.

“Don’t worry Senor President, just tell them he’s mad. They’ll believe you. The whole world will.”

How cocaine enters America
The simplest way to transport a drug is also the best for cocaine producers. Hundreds of tons of cocaine are packaged and put on trucks to make the long journey up through South and Central America and into Mexico. Along the way, drugs and money can change hands many times as the drugs are shipped northward by criminal cartels.

http://www.cocaineaddiction.com/much-cocaine-brought-us.html

“The price of cocaine in the United States has hardly moved,” Wainwright said. “In the past couple of decades it’s been about $150 per pure gram, and that’s barely budged, so there’s a puzzle there.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-much-does-cocaine-cost-in-the-us-2016-10

 

The establishment would like to thank the following for their contribution to maintaining us:

Coke heads and other such addicts.

Thank you!

 

Advertisements

Fake News

Posted in Media, Politics by earthlinggb on September 7, 2017

First of all, RIP Ernst Zundel. And that is not said lightly because, today, if ever anyone was to ask me who some of my “heroes” are (although, generally, I don’t have any anymore), Herr Zundel would definitely be one of them. What this man endured for the sake of honesty, truth and for the right to express his own opinion, was monstrous. However, “monstrous” is the right word for the people he was up against. People who, amongst other things, arsoned the man’s home and walked away scot free because nobody even bothered to look for them. Why? Because they are the “chosen race” – they get a “pass” for everything and anything they say or do just about.

So, on to the topic – and it’s a short one.

Donald Trump and “Fake News”. Where did all this “Fake News” business come from? Was it just something made up in Donald’s head? No, I doubt that because both sides of the political spectrum are using it to attack the other side’s supportive media outlets. “Fake News” has become a weapon of sorts. So where did it originate – the idea of referring to “fake news” that is. Well, I was watching a video regarding the late Ernst Zundel just yesterday and the oddest thing in what he said, during this interview with Jim Fetzer, just jumped out at me. I’ve captured the segment here. Have a listen:

Now, while I’m not saying, for definite, that this is where the idea, within the establishment, came from for the label of “Fake News”, I will say I’m pretty damned certain of it. “They” (both sides and particularly the “Pharisee types”) want a way of legislating to shut down what THEY suggest is “fake news” sites, youtube videos and the rest (including what would be this blog and a myriad of others with a far greater reach than mine). As Zundel says, it was/is a law from 1275 when the King of England wanted to stamp out any and all criticism of him. Well, today, it is just, now, the establishment and “pharisees” who wish to achieve that and what better way of doing it than using this old law as a basis. Of course, they will never refer to this law as being the catalyst for it but, nevertheless, I am convinced this is where the label and idea of being able to shut down “fake news” has come from. It’s been on my mind for a while as to where this “fake news” label appeared from and how – I am positive this is my answer.

The following is from the site MLDI who provide legal defence to journalists, bloggers and independent media, worldwide. [One must bear in mind, once more, however that, as lawyers, they are members of the Bar Association – please make sure and remember and appreciate what this means and the limitations within which they can possibly defend anyone – you do understand this don’t you?]

Americans please note because, while you cheer Donald Trump and his accusations of “Fake News” against CNN and others, you don’t have a damned clue regarding what you are actually supporting and what is lurking very quietly behind it. You are so damned quick (and gullible) to believe that “This President is different” – it amazes me. So many thought Obama would be because he was “black”. He was GIVEN to you! Donald Trump is GIVEN to you! They ALL are “Establishment” whether you wish to believe it or not. They may just be more your “colour” of establishment. What better way to have people “invest” their belief in one of their chosen people than to have you believe they are despised? It’s simply the use of reverse psychology and you are falling for it hook, line and sinker!

So, please read carefully and note “and to prevent the population from rising up in rebellion”. This is what your “fake news” is all about. No more, no less. Yes, you can say (and you are right to) that CNN, BBC, Fox etc etc have significant volume of fake news in them BUT they are the establishment’s fake news and that, my dear friends, is A-OK. Yes yes, Trump is attacking CNN… and?….So? Do you honestly think CNN is going to go out of business because of this? If they were to, don’t you think it would be controlled? Again, Trump firing at them is to give you the impression he’s on your side. Did he incarcerate Hillary? Anyhow, I digress (although it’s a valid and important digression).

 

http://www.mediadefence.org/news/explaining-issues-false-news

It seems that, if you want freedom of speech these days, it can be had in places like Uganda and Zimbabwe! How about that? But the United States and the United Kingdom? Well, just ask Ernst Zundel! Granted he was in Canada but what the hell.

Here’s another thing – Jacob Rees-Mogg I see is getting a lot of attention and supporters these days. I listened to this yesterday too. Hear him regarding freedom of expression and the right to open debate (on anything).

Damn! Damn! and Double Damn! The BBC has had it removed from youtube on Copyright grounds! Well, let me explain. He said, essentially, that it is his belief that any and all opinions should be allowed about any subject whatsoever to ensure we retain absolute freedom of expression in this country. I happened to comment on the now deleted youtube comment section that I believed him to be a hypocrite because I doubted whether this “freedom” would stretch to opinion on the holocaust. Interesting that the video was actually posted by the Jacob Rees-Mogg channel itself. Wouldn’t he have known it would be removed on copyright grounds (being a legislator and all that, you know?). Please note the man’s “christian” name (and yes, he’s a catholic but is he a JESUIT catholic? ;-)) – JACOB!

From his Wikipedia page: “After leaving Oxford Rees-Mogg worked for the Rothschild investment bank before moving to Hong Kong…”.

It amazes me, once more, that British people (like Americans) can be so gullible and “sucked in” to believing that these sorts of people actually speak for them. Rees-Mogg is a monster like the rest of them. Just read his Wikipedia page and think on it. Trump, Rees-Mogg, even Nigel Farage and the like are INCUBATED and then,when the right time comes along, they are “fed” to the populace and their “stances” on various topics are “spun” to make it LOOK as if they are in tune with your beliefs. They are NOT!

Anyway, I’ve said my peace. I’ve been at this blog since 2010. There was a time (and I think many bloggers are similar) that I had the time and inclination and fervent passion to write about all of this over so many subjects and, when I was in that “zone”, I’d pump out regular blogs and my readership was of the order of about 1000/day. The thing is, I’ve said really all I have to say. All of the false flags and news that comes out day after day in our media is just more of the same and we can analyse it for all it’s worth but… BUT…. it’s all the same. The same old shit and people either wake up to it or they don’t. The fundamental issue in this world is the money system and debt interest coupled with a legal system and “legal personality” that people STILL don’t understand or wish to. I’ve blogged about all of that and explained everything in as clearest of terms I can but, these days, I don’t have the time or inclination to just keep pumping out blogs on every subject and every false flag or false premise and attempt to expose shit for what it is. Frankly, it’s boring to me now and if the human race wishes to remain stupid, then so be it. These recent blogs of mine, over the past year or two, have been nothing in comparison to the time and effort I put into my major blogs a few years ago and which hardly get read. Today, I’m down to about 50 readers per day. I never looked for readership for the purpose of being  a “renowned blogger” in this space. The purpose of this blog was to educate and to highlight the issues. I look at the like of Infowars and think “There you go! People are still gullible enough to get led by the tail by a fat bastard who sells potions and “spun truth” mixed with bullshit.”

Serious pieces delving into money, the legal system and archival material to fully support it, is just not “sexy” enough and doesn’t give people that feeling of being part of a “gang” like “BLM” or “White supremacy” or even “Libertarian” and “Liberal” and Conservative”… or “anarchist” for that matter. People don’t want to understand and recognise solutions and the real issues. People want “leaders”. They always have and always will.

So fuck it. I have a personal life and in that personal life, I’m on to something big so, while I may still throw the odd thing out there that tickles my interest, I’d say “Appreciate all those guys (and women perhaps) who are providing you with SOLID alternative content because, for example, just this one blogpost alone, has taken me almost two hours to create and write. Imagine those who – like I used to be – are giving you masses of content everyday. They’re putting full days, everyday, into bringing you that content. So support them.”

Then again, some are definitely not doing sufficient research and background digging if they can pump out tons of content everyday so be careful about what you read.

And with that – ta ta till next time.

 

There’s life in America yet!

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, Politics by earthlinggb on August 13, 2017

As much as I denigrate Americans for their ignorance (I do the same for the UK and all other countries too), it seems there’s life left in the old dog yet if this is anything to go by. I’d estimate a good few hundreds if not a couple of thousand or so.

“You will not replace us!”

What you’re getting is Mainstream news talking about “White Nationalists” as if it’s a derogatory term. What you will NEVER hear is that same news media calling out the biggest nationalists on the block – JEWISH ones! Remember, a Nation is a people more than it is simply soil. The Jewish Nation exists, it’s just it exists globally!

And I get the idea they know who damned well is trying to! To my readers in Asia, Africa, South America, Middle East etc, don’t simply accept that which the mainstream media will push at you – that this is racist toward all non whites. I don’t have a racist bone in my body and respect every race EXCEPT one! The one which is trying to replace, not just us, but you too!

Sure, you’re going to get a few outright racists in this group – there’s always idiots in all groups – but this is about white genocide and white’s are not going to take it sitting down by the look of things. It’s been brought on by a little clique – you might be able to guess who – who want and need the demonisation of white christianity and brown islam because it then leaves THEM in pole position in being a – the only – group who have maintained their race as PURE! What most people fail to understand is that this same “race” I speak of PROJECTED their own belief system upon Adolf Hitler and Germans when they accused them of wanting a “pure race” of Aryans. Hitler recognised the “chosen ones” as having their own REAL version of this and that was what created the backlash against them in Germany. That and the fact they controlled germany’s economy purely for their own benefit.

History works in circles it seems and, perhaps – just perhaps – there is an awakening to the fact that this same clique, after winning that war with help from scum like Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin (all “incentivised” by the clique – particularly the drunken, gambling asswipe Churchill), have capitalised on their position globally so that now we are witnessing the bolshevism of the globe. The little talmudic, communist pricks might just see another backlash but far greater this time. However, it has to be an intellectually inspired one and NOT a brute force version. Brute force begets force. An intellectual revolution and attack on this clique is what is needed and shall overcome it. What’s done with them afterward is another story but it needs to attack the top. I include the jesuits in this too – don’t forget that aspect.

I should point out, I am neither on the right nor on the left – they mean nothing. I hope, if you have read enough of my blogs, that, by now, you will appreciate why.

Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, VA

Will it grow? Can it grow? Or will it be stamped out and infiltrated like “Occupy”? “Occupy” wasn’t focused. They didn’t know what the core of the issue was. They were “hippies” rather than a force. If this force understands its enemy, then we’re on to something. If not, then it’s just another waste of time. Did they chant “Jews will not replace us”? I don’t know. It was very clearly “You” and not “Jews” but then perhaps there were a number who decided to chant “jews” and the media picked up on it. If they were smart, they’d leave it as “You” – for now.

As for this guy and his speech about the usual “we won’t accept this” and “we need to bring this nation together” – just have a read of his Wikipedia page and you’ll get a good “feel’ for this creep McAullife.

 

But let me just point to one glaring fact: He invested $100K in Global Crossing in 1997 (it’s year of start up) and he walked away with $8.1M while Global Crossing crashed and burned in the Dotcom crash. I was in the industry at the time and I had my shares too. It’s a funny thing: Joe Bloggs never wins (we’re not meant to) because we’re barred from selling our Ordinary shares/stocks for 6 months after the date of stock flotation. However, it’s an odd thing but Executives and people like McAuliffe here, always seem to walk away smelling or roses. There is NO WAY this guy would have known to sell unless he was WELL “inside”. And these bastards with the black uniforms are dull, incompetent, unthinking “Yes sir, no sir” twats who, like children who need adult supervision and direction, just do as they are told. I knew a Police Inspector like that once too. A long time ago in a “galaxy” far far away, this Police Inspector even managed to get me off a road traffic fine (I know, it’s ‘nothing’, but it IS something just in a very very small way). At the time, I was exceptionally grateful – he couldn’t have his “son in law to be” fined by his own cult now could he? But, in retrospect, it’s just a peek at what can be done if there is influence in the right place eh? I’d spit in the bastard’s face today with his “holier than thou” attitude and “I’m an ex Police Inspector you know!”. You’re a twat Ken!

If you happen to read the above, the last two paragraphs cover not only Global Crossing but another company I happen to have worked for at the time (which will remain nameless) who did precisely what is described here in inflating its value to the market, its executives getting the cream and the employees getting shafted.

Anyhow, that’s off topic.

Zieg Heil!

(for all the right reasons, not the wrong ones)

Lat thing re the Unite the Right march: I’m not sure at what point this happened but it would appear that some “anonymous” American had a real beef with these people. He drove his very grey, unmarked car into them and then reversed, backed up and, seemingly, disappeared.

This shit is getting real!

The media saying “it seems, according to witnesses that the car deliberately tried to murder people” is just a little redundant given the obvious footage of it!

 

Still Waters run deep

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, Media, Music artists, Politics by earthlinggb on August 13, 2017

While the US and Russia are groups/factions within one and the same World Order, Roger Waters, nevertheless, talks sense and, somewhat like Zappa before him, points at the elephant in the room. But still, not anywhere near enough people listen. What is it with most people? Why do they possess a disability to recognise what is plainly staring them in the face? Why can’t they grasp the simple and obvious, that people in power want power and wish to maintain it? Why can’t they grasp that when, every single day – whether it’s from the left or the right in political terms – all functions of state are corrupt to the absolute core? Why do they still cling on to their preferred “colour” of corruption? “Any colour you like”. Why can’t they see there is an “Us and Them”?

The “Anti Semitic” Roger Waters:

Why do so many STILL refuse to see the power of the jew!

Had to add it. It’s such a great track….

I hate to admit this but it’s something that’s been bothering me for quite some time now. When I think of all of this stuff and its impact on the human race – I can be watching or reading something which just hits me quite often – and I get this intense welling up of emotion. I then suppress it before the tears roll over the eyes. It’s difficult understanding all of this – the immense lies and deception across so many fronts. Then you think of people you love and who used to love you and you still care about the life they lead and how it is impacted by this shit. You know they don’t recognise it (or care to). They don’t give it a moment’s thought. They’re young still. However, they will and, perhaps, one day, they won’t think “He was just a nut. He had it all and gave it all up – what a loser!” However, I wonder, is it just me? Sometimes I really would have liked to have taken the blue pill and remained in that matrix.

Anyhow, that’s another story.

I’m still asking: What is “semitism”?

Frank Zappa – Man of his time…. and ours.

Posted in Law, Politics by earthlinggb on July 31, 2017

Terrible quality but well worth listening to – Great interview with a great mind: You never see that today! He, however, thought the corruption and extortion was peaking in the early 80s with Reagan. I wonder what he’d have to say now.

Whether he said he wasn’t “anti semitic” but, secretly was (and I don’t think he was) or whether he truly wasn’t, I don’t know but I do know his offspring aren’t by the look of things. I simply do not understand how people – even like him – can look around and not see the issue.

I mean, he speaks of the military/industrial complex. He speaks of the educational system and politics etc etc – he “sees” all the symptoms BUT, for some odd reason, although he’s done all his homework (as many of us have), he has never picked up on the people behind it which, if you do this sort of work, it comes and hits you in the face like a double decker bus! However, he is nevertheless, a smart guy. Wish he was still around.

He even refers to Reagan as a “teleprompter president”. Whoa! He hadn’t seen anything yet had he? 🙂

The ADL came after him for this song. They’ll come after anyone for anything of course.

I want a nasty little Jewish Princess
With long phony nails and a hairdo that rinses
A horny little Jewish Princess
With a garlic aroma that could level Tacoma
Lonely inside
Well, she can swallow my pride

I need a hairy little Jewish Princess
With a brand new nose, who knows where it goes
I want a steamy little Jewish Princess
With over-worked gums, who squeaks when she cums
I don’t want no troll
I just want a Yemenite hole

I want a darling little Jewish Princess
Who don’t know shit about cooking and is arrogant looking
A vicious little Jewish Princess
To specifically happen with a pee-pee that’s snappin’
All up inside
I just want a Princess to ride
Awright, back to the top…everybody twist

I want a funky little Jewish Princess
A grinder; a bumper, with a pre-moistened dumper
A brazen little Jewish Princess
With titanic tits, and sand-blasted zits
She can even be poor
So long as she does it with four on the floor
(Vapor-lock)

I want a dainty little Jewish Princess
With a couple of sisters who can raise a few blisters
A fragile little Jewish Princess
With Roumanian thighs, who weasels ‘n’ lies
For two or three nights
Won’t someone send me a Princess who bites
Won’t someone send me a Princess who bites
Won’t someone send me a Princess who bites
Won’t someone send me a Princess who bites

It reminds me of Alison Chabloz in a way. As Zappa says, the song was based upon mainstream news commentary about a real phenomena called the “jewish Princess”. Well, Alison’s songs are precisely that – commentary on what has been reported openly.

However, the tribe wants its “holocaust denial” laws to be brought in to the UK and the USA and, while the CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) initially decided to drop the case against Alison, the “Campaign against Anti Semitism” took out a private prosecution and then the CPS took it on again! Baroness Arbuthnot was the original Judge but recused herself after Alison found photos of her attending a Conservative Friends of Israel gathering a few years back. The Baron Arbuthnot just so happened to be the Head of Conservative Friends of Israel a few years back. So, a conflict of interest. Of course, the fact there is a new judge does not mean there still isn’t a conflict of interest. After all, the CROWN Prosecution is prosecuting and who does any and all judges work for? The Crown! Also, with the number of jewish judges on the Supreme Court, how do you think this is going to work out? And to think that most idiots in this country of ours truly believe we have freedom and freedom of expression etc. It’s sad, it really is. When agenda ridden groups of people can get away – with impunity – with trying to destroy someone’s career and way of making a living (as they have done with Alison), and THAT is not blatantly impinging her human rights? Something is VERY wrong! But then you and I know something is very wrong AND we know from where it stems!

Alison’s last post/comment on her blog was June 22nd this year. Her next court date was June 23rd for discussion on the points of law. Nothing posted since so I imagine she has been advised or told to stop posting anything whatsoever. The actual trial, as I understand, was meant to have been 17th July this year, so just a couple of weeks ago. I do hope (for all our sakes) that this bullshit has been dropped. If not, we have a “war” on our hands and people better start getting savvy to this.

Alison’s song (((Survivors)))

My name is Irene Zisblatt and I come from Hungary (Fact)
Can you believe what evil Nazi bastards did to me (Poetic licence by Alison to describe what Irene is suggesting happened)
They gassed me once, gassed me twice, (According to Zisblatt, this is what happened)
But escape I did (Fact according to Zisblatt)
Over the electric fence (Camp had an electric fence so how else?)
Landed on the train (Reference to Zisblatt’s testimony that she had been saved by a young Sonderkommando (Jewish crematorium worker) who rescued her after she was thrown out of the Krema III gas chamber because the room was too full. He wrapped her in a blanket and tossed her over the 10-foot-high barbed wire fence around Krema III; she landed in an open railroad car of a train that was bound for the Neuengamme concentration camp in Germany.) Incredible strength eh?… And luck!

I saw them taking babies and tearing them in two (According to Zisblatt’s testimony)
And creepy Dr Mengele he removed my tattoo (Again Zisblatt’s testimony)
They tried to turn my brown eyes blue (Zisblatt said that she was one of the prisoners chosen for Dr. Mengele’s medical experiments. Zisblatt said “Mengele was trying to change the color of our eyes. So he injected our eyes and put us in a dungeon in the dark.)

Make lampshades from my skin (Zisblatt’s testimony)
For months I swallowed diamonds (Zisblatt’s testimony)
And shat them out again (Zisblatt’s testimony)

The point here is that Alison is taking Zisblatt’s testimony and simply raising an eyebrow. Why? Well, if you wish to swallow this, be our guest BUT it is your gullibility and naivety which will lead a lot of people who have done their homework on this whole story, into jails – it happens all over Europe and is coming to the UK unless you sit up and take notice and care about something other than Kardashians and other such shite! The rest, regarding the verses, is the same. It is all fact and reported fact. 

Tell us another
Come on, my brother
Repeat the cover
For tribal gain
Safe in our tower
Now is the hour
Money and power
We have no shame

Let’s lie and cheat on film
No one suspects a thing
Bigger the lie is better for us!
Every fake survivor
Every fake survivor’s laughing
Fake survivors’ tongues are wagging
All us frauds are busy blagging
Spin and yarn there’ll be no gagging
You shall pay
All the way
Every night and day!

My name is Elie Wiesel may I show you my tattoo
I wrote a book for US kids to study while at school
It’s full of nonsense tales of course
What do you all expect
But it made me very wealthy
As a liar I’m the best

At Auschwitz they burned
babies tho the water table’s high
Fred Leuchter’s work on ditches well it almost made me cry
Treblinka was a another one
There was no funeral pyre
I cannot speak Hungarian
But oh boy can I lie

History repeats itself
No limit to our wealth
Thanks to your debt we’re
Bleeding you dry
We control your media
Control of your books and TV
With the daily lies we feed you
Suffering victimisation
Sheeple have no realisation
You shall pay…

My name is Otto Frank and my daughter’s name is Anne
The poor girl died of typhus at Bergen-Belsen camp
She wrote an introduction
To her famous diary
The rest was penned by Levin then publishèd by me

Two thousand and sixteen the copyright came to an end
The Anne Frank trust decided once again the rules to bend
We truly had no choice although
The whole thing really stank
But the book now has two authors
Anne and Otto Frank.

Ballpoint pen:

People already knew that the dairy was written with a BIC ballpoint pen, which was only a prototype at that time and was in no way industrialized, let alone sold on the market. They were commercialized in 1951. This already permitted many people to determine the book to be a fraud

Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015.
But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.

Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences”, said Agnès Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.”

Bank notes let’s print some more
We love to see you poor
Let’s start a war
Our pockets to line
There is no more doubting
Every nations debt is mounting
While the bankers keep on counting
Pension fund has now gone awol
Nothing left upon your table
You shall pay..

Regarding the choruses, Alison does not, at any time, mention jews – neither in the verses – she is providing commentary on fake individuals (PROVEN fakes) and is then extrapolating from that, there being an “industry” surrounding this entire holocaust story. Is she attributing it to judaism? I see no evidence of that at all! If ANYONE wishes to take out a private prosecution, let it be Irene Zisblatt or any of the other fakes. What has this to do with “Anti semitism” and the Campaign against it? Further: What IS “anti semitism”? To understand that, one MUST ask the question: WHAT IS “SEMITISM”? Because I’ll be damned if I know! Do you? Can you define it? If not, how can ANYONE be accused of being “anti” a non defined word? And if something is truth, then truth NEEDS no legal protection!

You think if you’re not even remotely involved in anything “anti semitic” (how would you know?) then you don’t need concern yourself about this, right?

Well, just wait until they get their oppressive law(s) on this subject and you’ll see, because once they do, it’s game set and match and you’ll then see how “non anti semitic” you will be! The more they get in their favour, the more it will all become apparent to you! Those of us who already know, have had to put time and effort into studying it while you who can’t see it, doze. Once they have it all wrapped up nice and tight however, it WILL become far more apparent even to those who are asleep!

“ First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.”

OH THE IRONY!

THE BIG LIE!

The propagandised re-education of Germany AND, in fact, the world. You had BETTER believe it or else!

From UK Parliamentary archives…..

“There is a terrible prospect if there exists in this country now even a small body of opinion which will not accept this evidence. For if it is not accepted now there is little chance of its being remembered ten years from now…..

What are the facts? Why were these things clone? My noble friend Lord Addison and I have asked ourselves that question both during our trip and since. Why did not the Germans feed their prisoners sufficiently well to get a full day’s work out of them, and then when they were unfit any longer, from some cause or other, to do that work, shoot them? Why waste food in keeping them going for a few weeks longer? Why all these elaborate arrangements by which they were taken away in trailers to the crematorium and there put into ovens and their bodies burned?

So far as I know, there is only one of these camps, that at Belsen, within the British area; and that is obviously not one which ought to be visited, because it was discovered to be full of typhus, and we do riot want to add to our many problems in occupied Germany by spreading typhus in regions which I hope our troops are going to occupy for many years.

….when things settle down and cinemas are opened, and the curfew, which now operates at six o’clock, comes to an end, the Germans should be compelled to go to the cinemas and see the photographs taken of these camps, taken soon after their occupation by Allied troops. I think that that would be wise.

LORD ADDISON The second reflection in my mind is that if you can intensify the egotism of a nation in twelve years to the extent that the Nazis have done, so that they become regardless of the sufferings of others, that dreadful fact really gives some small ground for hope. It is an illustration of what you can achieve by intensified propaganda. It gives perhaps some little reason to think that if the Allied Nations deliberately arrange for the teaching of opposite doctrines to German children over a long period of years we may begin to have some hope that the national point of view will be improved. But I cannot help thinking that long continued propaganda amongst the Germans that the rights of others must be recognized—prompted and assisted by the occupying authority over a long period of years—will be essential.

In the second place, I consider that the Allied Nations must set up an organization which contemplates the occupation of Germany and its deliberate re-education over a long period of years. How successful that will be is a matter upon which we can only speculate. But one is impressed by the fact that well-directed, sustained propaganda, in these days, while on the one side it is an immense danger, does also, on the other side, present a certain degree of hope. It affords us ground for hoping that we may be able, with the aid of propaganda, if it is well directed, gradually to change the point of view of the German children during a long period of years. I feel no reason whatever to hope that the world will be secure in the future unless, at the same time as force is applied to prevent the recurrence of war, there is a deliberate and sustained endeavour to re-educate the German people and to remould their minds.”

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/12/21/uk-parliament-archives-no-gas-chambers-german-re-education/

Only agenda filled liars in the British courts and politics can maintain that there is no evidence to justify people questioning this entire story.

The question is: WHAT does this tribe really have on our politicians and court system? It must be something big!

 

 

Tommy: The Pinball Wizard!

Posted in "Terrorism", Geo-Political Warfare, Political History, Politics by earthlinggb on July 5, 2017

He stands like a statue,
Becomes part of the machine

He’s a pin ball wizard
There has got to be a twist

How do you think he does it? I don’t know!
What makes him so good?

Tommy Robinson: Nothing but an ignorant, racist thug. And don’t get me wrong: Any terrorism or abuse in this country, I totally despise but I do so from the true perspective of what is taking place and what the agenda is. If you think that the British government, MI5/MI6 and the Police and other intelligence services could not ensure that there is no such terrorism, then you are SADLY mistaken. Just as if you think that child abuse at very high levels within our society cannot be stopped. It ALL can BUT, when the higher echelons of society want such to go on, it will. For example, take a listen to Tim Fortescue (Conservative whip during Edward Heath’s tenure – and yes, you can be assured he kept “mum” for Heath too!):

So, back to Tommy. Tommy is/was a “nothing”. He was a skinhead head of the EDL and was one of the boys in the British National Party and yet Nick Griffin read him well. However, Nick Griffin got ousted by the BNP. Why? Well previous articles of mine cover that but let’s just say it was down to “those you cannot criticise or question”. The BNP was, and is, re-oriented toward demonising muslims and ignoring the real power behind the scenes who are another religious group altogether. However, what you need to understand is that you have muslims at high levels playing ball with “those you cannot criticise or question”. One of those being Sadiq Khan.

The immigrants into this country don’t have a damned clue what the agenda is. Sure, there may be some useful idiots among them and sure again there are quite a few who will capitalise on the offer europe is giving them and many who are bottom feeders and will rape and kill etc. No doubt and I’m not making excuses for them. I will say however that, if you were given the opportunity with masses of brits to go and live in a country which was offering you a significant increase in your standard of living, I’m sure many of you would. Further, if that same country had bombed the shit out of yours and you knew who had put you in that position in your home country (where, perhaps, you had at least some family members who were now dead due to your country of adoption) how would you view that country you were now moving to? I have no doubt a large percentage of you would take advantage while there would be a few useful idiots among you who would take a little bribe or two from the host country’s intelligence services or work with countrymen who you didn’t know were working with intelligence services. Then added to that, we’ve got our share of paedos and rapists in this country so if some of you went abroad, that wouldn’t change. Every culture has its fair share of slime. Government and Intelligence services just LOVE using you to their advantage.

However, just yesterday, we have the following article from the Jewish Chronicle:

 

So how does a skinhead thug make his way up into the “limelight” of British politics (agitator politics) and, suddenly, be seen as some sort of British nationalist hero? Because he’s worked hi way into the ‘right’ circles, shown his willingness to play the game and put himself, effectively, “up for sale”. Those who “buy” him see his usefulness in bringing an uneducated (as to the real agenda) bunch of similarly minded, but ignorant, bunch of idiots who (quite rightly – I am anti sharia law and burkas etc in this country. You come here? You integrate. But who truly has integrated in all of the immigration into this country since the 1960s or earlier? Indians haven’t, Bangladeshi’s haven’t, Pakistanis haven’t, Gurkhas haven’t and muslims of course. A few more I could name but I’ll leave it there.) are quite happy to follow along and kick the shit out of anyone they deem a “raghead”.

Who have integrated? Well, jews of course. How and why is that? And, I may add, the hasidic jews and the more extreme jewish sects have not but the vast majority of secular jews have. Well, let’s consider, just for a moment, who racists point the finger at. Racists aren’t too discerning you see. They point the finger at anyone who stands out because they’re easily identified. What would you do if you wished to infiltrate an organisation or society and change it to your liking without that organisation or society seeing what you’re doing? You’d integrate. You’d become their “friend’. You’d talk the same, dress the same, use your wealth (if you had it) to “buy” their confidence etc. You’d promote your kind (and useful idiots) into positions of relative power in many areas of society. Have you looked at who the head judges are in the UK? Have you looked at who controls essential media positions in the UK? Have you looked at the number of “those you cannot criticise or question” in the House of Lords and the House of Commons? Have you looked at the number of major politicians in the UK (Cabinet members etc) who are also members of “Friends of” societies in the UK? Friends of who? How is it that it is generally thos who are “Friends of” who climb the ladder. Have you not noticed that?

Have you never stopped to wonder why ISIS, while they attack muslim countries (and I’m not going into the Sunni v Shia argument here) and European/UK targets (so we’re told to believe) – Manchester: “We were trying to exit through the doors but there was a line of security who stopped us and told us to use another exit. Then they said “Run” and then the explosion happened” – but they have never attacked their, seemingly biggest foe, Israel? Odd isn’t it? They even apologise if the “inadvertently do”!

 

But, of course, you will have people say “But they have attacked Israel!” Really? You mean this “attack”?

Read the whole thing: http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Rocket-alert-sirens-sound-in-southern-Israel-near-Gaza-border-486671

Seriously laughable. A rocket lands in a greenhouse and one person suffered shock! Have you ever listened to the false testimonies of a raft of jews who “suffered” in the holocaust in death camps but lived to tell the tale? Have you ever counted how many there are? Have you ever considered that the Israeli government and media may just roll out an “ISIS attack” to create the perception wished for? If that was an ISIS attack, BOY was it vapid and incompetent. Unlike those dastardly muslims eh?

So, back to Tommy (again):

Particularly that jewish chronicle article. Read it intelligently. Read it from the hegelian dialectic perspective.

One community member would take legal action if her name was tied to the event. Why would she? Is she not proud of her activity and support for “the right thing”?

North west “Friends of Israel” Dennison states their community finds his opinions “abhorrent” but, formally, he would have to say that. Not only that but, again, the hegelian dialectic comes into play – you play both sides: The Thesis, Antithesis and, from that, Synthesis. It’s how they work! With some of their members being attracted to “his policies”? What “policies” could an agitator have I wonder? MI5 policies? Mossad policies? As the vast majority of non muslim, non jewish British population go about their daily lives and business, there are small sectors of this country who have “policies” and agendas they are working to. That vast majority I speak of are entirely in the dark and ignorant of what those policies are. However, we can be sure that the “Football lads” will be part of them and they will follow blindly in the belief that there is, in fact, a muslim controlled agenda at play to cause terrorism in the UK and Europe. They completely ignore (it doesn’t even enter their heads) that all these “terrorists” are known to MI5, that the government allows them in (Ah! But that’s because of the EU right? lol). Do they even know that there is one religious group throughout Europe that, not only has substantial power in the UK parliament but also has its own EU PARLIAMENT? And it isn’t muslims. It isn’t even Christians or catholics! It’s not Hindus or buddhists or Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance followers and it isn’t even jehovah’s witnesses! But think about it. If any of the aforementioned groups did have its own EU Parliament, there would be uproar right? Ah, but not in this case there isn’t. After all, its “those who cannot be criticised or questioned” again!

The European Jewish Parliament or EJP (formerly known as European Jewish Union or EJU) is a non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Brussels whose stated aim is to be “a uniting structure for all Jewish communities and organizations throughout Western, Eastern and Central Europe.”

The EJU-backed EJP is the brainchild of Ukrainian billionaire Vadim Rabinovich.

European Jewish Union
The EJU group was founded in the Spring of 2011 by Ihor Kolomoyskyi and Vadim Rabinovich

The EJU hoped to establish a European Jewish Parliament, comprising 120 members modeled on the Israeli Knesset. This group would then represent the concerns of the Jewish community to the European Union.

European Parliament building where is held the EJP assembly.
The European Jewish Parliament was inaugurated on February, 16th 2012.

The first EJP annual general assembly was held in Brussels on May 15 and 16 2012.

EJP logo

Flag of Europe.
The European Jewish Parliament logo is modeled on the flag of Europe’s crown of 12 golden stars with 5 rays on a blue background.

Instead the EJP logo uses a crown of 11 golden stars with a 12th star being a white Star of David, stylized as on the flag of Israel, on a blue background.

“.. could never be a partner of a respectable or mainstream jewish organisation”. Of course such could not admit to such being the case because then the jewish “fraternity” would expose itself. However, again, they play both sides. It is not in jewish interests to take any side whatsoever because the jewish interests lie in a jewish agenda. That agenda is to maintain and grow the flood of immigrants into all of Europe – muslims into all european countries and populations from each european country into other european countries. Why? Well it is very very simple. There will be no countries in europe which are comprised of a majority of that country’s generational nationals. Each country’s culture is decimated and each existing culture and newly introduced culture is demanded to accept the new “non culture” which grows. It takes years  decades even, but it is what “those you cannot criticise or question” want because then, with the “death” of christian values (and that has been ongoing for decades already) and of muslim values, they will have achieved “mongrel states” where there is no “one peoples voice” to hold the government to account. This has nothing to do with a Conservative government or a Labour government. This is an agenda far higher than the incumbent party in power. The party in power is held up to you as a useful scapegoat for the ignorants to chastise and every single government, since the inception of such, has had its followers and its critics while every single person in the country holds views which agree with the policies of both parties, both left wing and right wing. This is by design. The major policies which the establishment want, are retained by the newly entering power government when, in reality, that new government – when in opposition – opposed (of course) the policy(s) of the previous government. They could make a turnaround on the previous government policies but they never do (with exception of the minor stuff which does not affect the direction of the “ship of state”).

Tommy, however, is a useful idiot. A player. He’ll get backing (he’s got it!) and jewish money but then so will the other side. And when either or both are no longer required, he’ll be dropped like a sack of shit because that is what he is.

“We should be clear that a gathering of 12 people does not change the jewish community’s overwhelming rejection of dead-end politics that only divide and damage British society”.

It’s a great statement isn’t it? It sounds so sincere. Free of deceit. Well, one knows one from one’s actions.

“Oh it’s just an old lady. What the hell does she know and what power does she have?’ – It’s not the power that she has. It is the power she works for.

So, if the jews want this multiculturalism, why would they support a Tommy Robinson? Simple! The jews are playing two games: They want a clash of civilisations to then form the synthesis (muslims are the thesis, our reaction the antithesis). They want  the mongrelisation of europe so they may, quietly, maintain their own (not overtly jewish) identity and power-base within europe while gentiles (that is goyim – christians, muslims and anyone non jewish) are entirely mongrelised while being unable to agree (the division) on who their true enemy is. The second part of their game is to maintain a jewish state and an even “Greater Israel” and that is what the terrorism is all about (constructed terrorism). It is to gain and keep support for “poor little Israel” and support for their larger aims in the middle east and elsewhere and to ensure support from the western populations for the use of the Western Armed forces to do the jewish will. All of your “heroes” who are going out and getting legs and arms blown off (and killed) are doing it all for a jewish agenda.

So the balance is “multiculturalism” with “those dastardly muslims but not ALL muslims, just those extremist ones”. The fact is, however, you can get nothing more extreme than a “Globalist Zionist jew”.

Now, here’s a few bible verses. I do not add these because I am a bible basher in any shape or form. I add them because this all goes back a long long way and it is these people (see Rothschild admission below) who believe in something (Satan is my guess – after all they are all evil bastards with the policies they adopt – and don’t forget Grenfell Tower) and/or they utilise the bible as a form of template. There is absolutely no doubt about this once you have done years and years of research on it.

Luke 20:46
Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the highest seats in the synagogues, and the chief rooms at feasts;

Luke 21:12
But before all these, they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name’s sake.

John 9:22
These words spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.

John 12:42
Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue

Acts 13:42
And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.

Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Revelation 3:9
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

John 7:1
After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.

Remember, all of these passages are from the NEW Testament NOT the Old Testament (or Torah) of the jews. When you hear of people – normally left wing liberals, comedians, mad evangelicals etc – taking the piss out of the bible, suggesting it is filled with hate and “Holy fire judgement” etc, the irony is that they are taking from the OLD testament and applying it to Jesus. The OLD testament was the OLD one! The NEW testament superceded it! Why did Lord Rothschild refuse to swear on the New Testament when he was first admitted to a seat in the house of Parliament? Pretty damned obvious!

And back to “those who cannot be criticised or questioned”: ONLY (and I mean ONLY) jews can get away with criticising, taking the piss and absolute utter filth (see pornography) while, if you say “Did the holocaust REALLY happen?” you’re demonised by jewish led entities the world over, demonised by the gentiles who have swallowed the story (almost all considering it’s been stuffed down their collective throats almost since birth) and, not only is your freedom of speech been banned BUT, in some countries (poor poor Germany for example), you go to jail for the AUDACITY of uttering 5 words: “Did the holocaust really happen?”. Let me explain to you something: The truth does not need legal protection. Period!

ADMISSION OF BARON DE ROTHSCHILD.

HC Deb 26 July 1858 vol 151 cc2105-15 2105
§MR. SPEAKER Any hon. Member who desires to take his seat will please come to the table to be sworn.
§Baron LIONEL NATHAN DE ROTHSCHILD returned as one of the Members for the City of London, came to the table, and was about to take from the Clerk at the table 2106 a copy of the Oath prescribed by the 21 & 22 Vict., c. 48, passed this Session, when
§MR. WARREN rose and said: Mr. Speaker, I rise to order. I wish to ask you, Sir, whether notice was not necessary before—[“Order! Chair!”] Sir, I rise to order—
§MR. SPEAKER Order, order! The taking of his seat by an hon. Member is matter of privilege, and ought not to be interrupted by any discussion whatever.
§ The prescribed form of oath was again tendered to BARON DE ROTHSCHILD by the Clerk,

§BARON LIONEL DE ROTHSCHILD Sir, I beg to state that, being a person professing the Jewish religion, I entertain a conscientious objection to take the oath which, by an Act passed in the present Session, has been substituted for the oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy, and Abjuration, in the form therein required.
§ Whereupon the Clerk reported the matter to Mr. SPEAKER, who desired Baron LIONEL NATHAN DE ROTHSCHILD to withdraw; and he withdrew accordingly.

§LORD JOHN RUSSELL My object in rising, Sir, is to move a Resolution in conformity with an Act recently passed. (21 & 22 Vict. c. 49). It is as follows:— That it appears to this House that Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild, a person professing the Jewish Religion, being otherwise entitled to sit and vote in this House, is prevented from so sitting and voting by his conscientious objection to take the Oath which, by an Act passed in the present Session of Parliament, has been substituted for the Oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy, and Abjuration, in the form therein required.
Mr. J. A. SMITH seconded the Resolution.
§ Question proposed.

§MR. WARREN Mr. Speaker, it is with great reluctance and regret, and contrary to my own previously-declared determination not to open my lips again on this question, that I rise to address a few observations to the House. It has now arrived at a very grave crisis in its constitutional history and that of the country, and a sense of duty will not allow me to remain silent. I have already, and very lately, as an humble member of the great Conservative party, entered my most solemn protest against the step which the Legislature was about to take in this matter, and have but little to say upon this momentous occasion. This House is about to consummate that great constitutional change in the character of the House which it has so lately been empowered to effect, 2107 and to take upon itself the entire responsibility of admitting into the representative branch of the Legislature a gentleman who has this moment declared that he cannot take—that he cannot be bound by an oath administered on the Holy Gospels—an oath which has been so long taken by all other Members of this House, with the exception of those who, though Christians by profession, were permitted, in deference to their religious scruples, to use a different form of oath or declaration. Sir, this is to me a most painful and distressing moment—but I cannot help myself; and, in accordance with what my conscience tells me is my most imperative duty, I am resolved to take the sense of the House upon the proposed Resolution. Lest, however, any one should do me the grievous injustice of supposing that I am, at a moment so painful, actuated by considerations of a personal nature with respect to either Baron Rothschild or the ancient race to which he belongs, I beg now most emphatically and truly to disclaim any such feelings. With reference to that gentleman, I must take this opportunity of declaring, that never in my life did I hear a whisper of even an insinuation against his character—of anything inconsistent with that reputation for purity, that spotlessness of character which Baron Rothschild enjoys. He occupies, deservedly, a high social position in this country; and I can only say again, that, while compelled to oppose the Resolution of the noble Lord opposite—to resist him to the last on this question—I have not in my heart one particle of animosity towards either the Jewish race or that representative of it now seeking admission into this Christian Legislature. If it be really the deliberate will of this House of Commons, as it has undoubtedly been declared the will of the Imperial Legislature that they may, if they think fit, exercise a privilege which I for one regard as so dangerous, I have nothing more to say; but in the meantime I beg, though I should go out alone into the lobby, to meet the Resolution of the noble Lord with a direct negative.
§Mr. WALPOLE I do not think my hon. and learned Friend could have caught correctly the terms of the noble Lord’s Resolution. It is simply declaratory, in terms of the new Act, of a matter of fact which neither my hon. and learned Friend nor any one else will contest, and does not admit either Baron Rothschild or any other member of the Jewish persuasion to a seat in this House. I hope, therefore, that my hon. and learned Friend will not put the 2108 House to the trouble of dividing at the present stage of the proceedings.
§Mr. WARREN I am much obliged to my right hon. Friend, and shall not press for a division on this Resolution. I had not caught the exact words of it and was taken altogether by surprise by the whole proceedings of this morning. I therefore withdraw my Motion.
§Resolved,— That it appears to this House that Baron Lionel de Rothschild, a person professing the Jewish Religion, being otherwise entitled to sit and vote in this House, is prevented from so sitting and voting by his conscientious objection to take the Oath which, by an Act passed in the present Session of Parliament, has been substituted for the Oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy, and Abjuration, in the form therein required.

§LORD JOHN RUSSELL I now rise, Sir, to move a Resolution in pursuance of the Act which received the assent of Her Majesty on the 23rd instant, and which is entitled “An Act to provide for the relief of Her Majesty’s subjects professing the Jewish religion.” In order that the House may be fully in possession of the words of the Act I shall now read them. By the first clause it is enacted that— Where it shall appear to either House of Parliament that a person professing the Jewish religion, otherwise entitled to sit and vote in such House, is prevented from so sitting and voting by his conscientious objection to take the Oath which by an Act passed or to be passed in the present Session of Parliament has been or may be substituted for the Oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy, and Abjuration, in the form therein required, such House, if it think fit, may resolve that thenceforth any person professing the Jewish religion, in taking the said Oath to entitle him to sit and vote as aforesaid, may omit the words ‘and I make this declaration upon the true faith of a Christian.’ It is not necessary to read any further. I propose, in conformity with those words in the clause, “such House, if it think fit,” to move a Resolution as nearly as possible in the terms of the Act itself. Of course, I shall not now raise any question as to whether a Jew should sit in this House. That question has been repeatedly argued, and it has now been decided by Parliament, at least to the extent of leaving it to either House to act as it may think fit. I therefore content myself with moving: “That any person professing the Jewish Religion may henceforth, in taking the Oath prescribed in an Act of the present Session of Parliament to entitle him to sit and vote in this House, omit the words ‘and I make this declaration upon the true faith of a Christian.'”
2109
MR. J. A. SMITH seconded the Resolution.
§ Motion made and Question put, That any person professing the Jewish Religion may henceforth, in taking the Oath prescribed in an Act of the present Session of Parliament to entitle him to sit and vote in this House, omit the words, ‘and I make this declaration upon the true faith of a Christian.’

§Mr. WARREN Now, Sir, the time has arrived at which I may make my Motion, and state that I shall take the sense of the House upon it. It is, of course, not necessary for me to repeat any of the observations I have already offered, but must beg the House to regard them as having been offered in opposition to the noble Lord’s present Resolution, which I now meet with a direct negative.
§LORD HOTHAM Sir, I do not intend to occupy the time of the House for more than one or two moments. My object is simply to explain the reasons of the Vote which I shall feel it my duty to give. I have always found myself conscientiously under the necessity of opposing the admission to Parliament of persons professing the Jewish religion. I have done so upon principle, and without the slightest particle of personal feeling. As Parliament, however, has decided against my views of this matter, I did not come down to the House to record any further vote on this question, but to take part in the discussion of other business; but, being here, I have to consider what course I ought to pursue. The part I have hitherto taken renders it impossible for me to concur in the Resolution of the noble Lord; while I cannot withdraw and abstain from giving any vote upon the question. I do not think it would be either an honest or a straightforward mode of proceeding, to shrink from expressing my opinion on a subject, with reference to which I think so strongly. I am therefore reduced to the necessity, without the slightest personal feeling towards Baron Rothschild, of going into the lobby with those who are resolved to meet the Resolution with a direct negative.
§MR. HADFIELD said, he had never been able to account for the prejudice which influenced hon. Gentlemen opposite in their hostility to the Jews. In his opinion the world was more indebted to that particular family of the human race than any other nation or people that ever existed. Hon. Gentlemen talked of excluding the Jews as a matter of Christian principle. He would say, let them endeavour to Christianize 2110 themselves by following the example of Him they all reverenced as the great messenger of peace, charity, and toleration, and who directed that the Gospel should be preached to all men—but to the Jew first. He regretted that this prejudice towards that family of the human race, to whom we were so deeply indebted, should have so long continued, but rejoiced in the opportunity of taking part in the removal of the Just of the disabilities which that prejudice had in this country inflicted upon them. He looked upon that occasion as a great triumph for the cause of religious liberty.
§MR. WALPOLE Sir, when first this question was brought before the House expressed my opinion, and I have never shrunk from that opinion since, that it was a religious rather than a political question. I thought from the first that the Legislature of this country, being admittedly a Christian Legislature from the earliest time, was not a body into which a person professing the Jewish religion could properly or conscientiously be admitted. I merely mention that for the purpose of showing, that now that the time has come for this House to determine how it will act, it is impossible for me not to feel, while admitting that Parliament has given us the power to seat Baron Rothschild on our own responsibility, that considering the opinions I have always held, I cannot be a party to the proposed Resolution. One or two words more and I have done, for I do not wish to raise any controversy on this occasion. I cannot disguise from myself that the person whom the House is now about to seat has this very much in his favour—that throughout the whole of this controversy he has never attempted to act in a manner contrary to the law of the land or to the rules of this House. I think it due to Baron Rothschild that I should say so much. I agree in the observations made by my noble Friend (Lord Hotham) when stating the reasons which would compel him to vote against this Resolution, and I shall go into the lobby with my noble Friend. There is one other observation that I would make. The hon. Members who advocate the admission of the Jews think that they are now closing this matter; but in point of fact they aro not. The course taken by Parliament in reference to this question is a course which in my opinion cannot be too much deprecated. I, for one, am extremely sorry that if Baron Rothschild, and those who like him, profess the Jewish religion, were 2111 to be admitted into the Legislature at all, they were not admitted frankly, plainly, and honestly, by a declaration made by Parliament in the form of an Act of the Legislature, instead of in a mode which I am afraid we shall hereafter find cause to regret.
§MR. SPOONER Sir, the hon. Member for Sheffield has charged those who oppose the admission of the Jews into Parliament as so acting in consequence of a prejudice against the Jewish people. I, for one, utterly deny that. The Jews are a most interesting nation—interesting, if we look to their past history, and more so if we contemplate their future destiny. No, Sir, we are not actuated by any prejudice against the Jewish people as a nation, or from personal objection to the respectable individual who now presents himself for admission. There cannot be a second opinion with regard to that gentleman personally. He has the respect and esteem of all who know him, and especially of those who possess his friendship. What does actuate those who oppose such admission is the full and decided conviction that a Christian assembly like this Legislature should be wholly Christian, if we expect what we pray for—the blessing of Almighty God on our exertions to properly direct the affairs of a free and Christian people. The hon. Member for Sheffield (Mr. Hadfield) who so much rejoices at the House of Lords having given their consent to the admission of Jews to this House by a simple Resolution, has not made one word of objection to the Reasons which came down from that House for having rejected that clause of the Bill which permitted the Jew to take his seat in this House—which Reasons declared, in emphatic terms, that the Jew was morally unfit to sit and legislate in a Christian Legislature. I beg to express my full concurrence in those Reasons, and therefore I cannot give my vote for admitting a person whom those Reasons declare to be totally unfit for admission into this House.
§MR. NEWDEGATE I confess, Sir, I was not aware, till a few minutes ago, that this Resolution was to be proposed to-day; and having had no notice that such a course would be taken, I arrived rather hastily. It is not my intention to detain the House by any lengthened observations; but I wish to say one or two words before the Resolution is put from the Chair, in reference to the conduct of the House of Lords, which I think has been very much misunderstood. What the House of Lords have done, Sir, is this:—They have placed this matter, 2112 which affects the constitution of this House, entirely in the hands of this House, at the same time retaining the strong conviction which that noble assembly has consistently and conscientiously acted on for eleven years. They have recorded the fact that their conscientious opinion on the subject of the admission of Jews was unchanged, at the same time that they thought it quite consistent with their duty and quite consistent with the constitution of the country to cease to interfere with what concerns the composition of this House alone. I think it due to the House of Lords that their conduct should not be considered as disrespectful to this House, when they thought fit to place the constitution of the House of Commons in the hands of its Members. With regard to my own course, deprecating as I do any attempt to admit the Jews into this House, I shall continue to act on those views which have hitherto influenced me, and record my vote against the Resolution.
§MR. FOX remarked, that the well-merited acknowledgment of the right hon. Gentleman the Home Secretary that Baron Rothschild had never throughout the whole of this controversy attempted to contravene the law, might with equal justice have been applied generally to the body to which he belonged, for it was a principle of the Jewish religion that, wherever they might be carried away captive, or in whatever country their lot was cast, they must respect the law as established, and pray for the peace and order of the country serving as their temporary home. To that rule they had always adhered. With regard to their moral unfitness he would remind the House of Lords, and those who used that argument, that the moral law of Judaism was the moral law of Christianity. For himself he would rather that this concession had been made upon the simple and broad ground of religious toleration instead of as a matter affecting the constitutional right of the House of Commons to make rules for the admission of its own Members. He concurred in the opinion of the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. Walpole) that the question was not closed. It must again come under consideration upon the direct ground of religious toleration. But in the mean while it was most absurd to talk of constitutional government while Her Majesty remained the ruler of 180,000,000 of people, not one of whom was qualified to raise his voice in that House to state the grievances of his fellow-countrymen, They 2113 talked of the Christian character of the Parliament. There were two different ways of showing their Christianity. One way was by their words and oaths, the other and better way was by their deeds; and he was satisfied that, whatever their professions, they would never act up to the spirit of a Christian Legislature until they were influenced by feelings of toleration and respect for the opinions of others.
§LORD JOHN RUSSELL It is not my intention to detain the House, but the right hon. Gentleman the Secretary of State has made one or two observations which seem to call for some remark on my part. The right hon. Gentleman, in the first place, has objected to the mode in which this question has been settled by Parliament. I beg him and the House to recollect that that mode of settlement was not proposed by the advocates of the admission of Jews, by those who have rested the question upon the ground of civil and religious liberty, but by those who have hitherto been the chief opponents of the measure which has now happily proved successful. It was supposed—I know not for what reason—that it would prove more acceptable to those who still oppose the admission of Jews than any other mode that could be suggested; but, I repeat, it was not our choice, but the choice of the other House of Parliament. The right hon. Gentleman made another objection. which I should be sorry to think well founded. He said that this was not the end of the question. After the discussions that this subject has under- gone—after so strong an expression of the opinion of the House of Commons as we have had during the present Session—I do trust none will hereafter attempt to deprive the Jews of the privilege which we are about to confer upon them. Undoubtedly it will be in the power of anybody to do so by moving to rescind this Resolution or by some other mode; but I trust that what we are now doing, being in conformity with the general wishes of this House as representing the country, there will be no change in the policy of Parliament upon this subject. I have nothing further to say. The right hon. Gentleman having frankly and truly acknowledged that Baron Rothschild has never attempted to infringe the law, I am hound to state, on the other hand, that those who have opposed the admission of Jews have done so from no personal or unworthy feeling, but simply in the discharge of a duty imposed upon upon them by their consciences. I rejoice 2114 at the success which has attended our efforts this question, and believe that the principle of religious liberty has made great progress.
§ Question put, That any person professing the Jewish Religion may henceforth, in taking the Oath prescribed in an Act of the present Session of Parliament to entitle him to sit and vote in this House, omit the words, ‘and I make this declaration upon the true faith of a Christian.’

§ The House divided:—Ayes 69; Noes 37; Majority 32.

Finally, why do you think wee Tommy is being heralded as the last bastion of British pride by Alex Jones? Alex, your colours are so transparent but then they have been for a long long time.

So Tommy, you’re no “British national hero”. You’re a prostitute for the “Synagogue”.

Keep “pushing the buttons” Tommy. Keep flipping, nudging and tilting. Your score’s increasing.

Britain re-taking the USA

Posted in Political History, Politics by earthlinggb on February 23, 2017

What did I tell ya?

How many blogposts have I written about this relationship, and the ties and history surrounding it, over the years?

But it’s “Conspiracy Theory” 🙂

Just recently, I published a post regarding the background workings of the Donald Trump/ Nigel Farage relationship and the British – Israel link. Didn’t take too long before this turned up now did it? Did I have a Crystal Ball? Nope. Just done years of “homework”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/23/donald-trumps-love-royal-family-may-see-united-states-join-commonwealth/

uk-us-relationship

Again, I say unto you: Read your Congressional Archives!

You were given a SECOND Constitution in 1871 after the Civil War. That second Constitution deemed the District of Columbia Government as the CORPORATION of the UNITED STATES. You were going bankrupt (at the hands of British/European Bankers and the Revolutionary War had been “won” on the Battlefield but not – in ANY way – in reality). Your United States Government is NOT your government and never has been. Why do you think all your Presidents have been linked to British Monarchy?

Anyhow, I do realise that there will be a vast number of people out there who will never accept what I’m telling you no matter what transpires. Your media will tell you that it’s great and you will be conditioned to believe it is what you want and that you condone it.

Poor old America – you really believed you were the land of the free and home of the brave while your Military is used by that Government in DC, owned by British/Israel interests, to use your kids to die for Corporate aims.

 

From U.S. Congressional Archives 1940:

Mr. Speaker, In order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining this Re-public, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the RECORD a number of articles to prove this point. These articles are entitled “Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife.” This is part I, and in this I include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled “Triumphant Democracy.”

In this he expresses himself in this manner:

“Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states—the British-American Union.”

God Bless the Commonwealth! 🙂

Why Trump and Farage?

Posted in Political History, Politics by earthlinggb on November 22, 2016

A short one because, in essence, it is already written in U.S. Congressional Archives (as you will see).

Having watched all this develop and listened and analysed closely what, how, who, why and when, this is my conclusion. You need not agree with it but I certainly do.

113550697_farage_trump-large_transeo_i_u9apj8ruoebjoaht0k9u7hhrjvuo-zlengruma

Why Trump and Farage? PERHAPS this is why:
What will Britain do? The day is coming when Britain will have to decide on one of three courses. First, shall she sink—comparatively to the giant consolidations—into a third- or fourth-rate power, a Holland or Belgium comparatively? Here note that we do not postulate her actual decline, but the increased growth of other powers. Or, second, shall she consolidate with a European giant? Or, third, shall she grasp the outstretched hand of her children in America and become again as she was before, the mother member of the English-speaking race?

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/10/04/united-states-congressional-record-the-new-world-order/
And look up “The Pilgrims Society” on Wikipedia. Note who the Patron is and then look at the names associated with it. (HINT: Liz)

Add:
Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to read the speeches given by the American members of the Pilgrims, for they, like all converts, are more un-American and pro-English than the British themselves.
…..
Mr. Choate then referred to a dispute which arose in regard to the passage of ships through the Panama Canal, and intimated that it was the understanding of Hon. John Hay and Lord Landsdowne that the British should have equal rights with us in the use of this Canal; a right which the British have never conceded to the United States in the Suez Canal. We have even been driven out of foreign markets by England for many, many years, and in her wars she has brazenly furnished us with a blacklist of firms with which we are not supposed to trade; and we, like fools, comply with her demands.
….
Now the people of this country are not going to allow anybody— any Congress, any government, any President—to break the good faith which they have pledged to the mother country. In making this statement, Mr. Choate takes the position that Great Britain or England is our mother country; the same position that was taken by Cecil Rhodes over 50 years ago and by Andrew Carnegie in 1893, when he wrote a book entitled, “Triumphant Democracy.” I want you to note particularly that this was in 1913, and that 1913 was the very year we changed our Government from a republic to a semidemocracy; the year in which we destroyed constitutional government, international security, and paved the road for us to become a colony of the British Empire. It was also the same year in which we, by adopting the Federal Reserve Act, placed our Treasury under the control and domination of the Bank of England and the international banking groups that are now financing the British-Israel movement in the United States.

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/american-congressional-record-1940/

SO much more detail I could give you to support this but I just don’t have the time to write a book.

BETS PLEASE!

NICE: Einat Wilf tells you what it’s all about in her own words.

Posted in "Terrorism", Geo-Political Warfare, Media, Politics by earthlinggb on August 7, 2016

“Israel is right now at war. It is a war in which the weapons are not tanks, airplanes, or missiles, but words, images, and ideas. Defenders of Israel must understand the kind of ideological war they are fighting before they can prepare a plan for victory. In this lecture, Dr. Wilf discusses how Israel can fight and win the battle of the mind.”

And who created the words and images (of which she speaks) of NICE and Munich? Her husband, the “journalist”, and his daughter, Thamina Stoll (another “journalist and student at Duke University studying political science).

As you listen to this, read between the lines AND ensure you understand that she is projecting her words “truth and facts” on “the enemy” – i.e. you and I. She is the one who is willing to use the lies and the manipulation.

If you allow people like me (and, perhaps, yourself or anyone else) to be “shut down” for using OUR words in this war, then they win and we/you lose.

By the way, who’d you guess as the “student” she spoke to re writing the PhD paper? Thamina by chance? 😉

Oh! And if you’d never heard of Thamina, then let me introduce you to Richard Gutjahr’s 22 year old daughter that very few of the mainstream media articles regarding the Munich attack even referred to as Gutjahr’s daughter, nevermind say “What an amazing coincidence Thamina with your father just having taken footage of the Nice attack a week or so ago.”:

Thamina Stoll Father's kitchen

And BOY didn’t she panic for a few seconds at the beginning of this interview? Meanwhile, the interviewer either hasn’t got a clue who her father is (doubtful) or is told not to even go there (like in so many other interviews both filmed and in print.

“Words and images” people. That’s the “war” Wilf speaks of.

NOW, listen to this one because, in my opinion, the guy who comes on at 2.37 to talk to her, throws in a little grenade and he knows he is. He’s purposefully giving a heads up. He purposefully brings up the point “Oh no, not again!” to check her reaction and she MUST then mention her father (but without naming him you may notice). You then hear her stutter and think and stutter and try to figure out how to answer this…..

Now, here’s a Daily Mail article on her and Munich:

Stoll mail 1 Stoll Mail 2 Stoll Mail 3 Stoll Mail 4

Not a word about her father. She’s just some American student who originates from Munich and was with her family and Gran. Poor little dear. What a shock for her eh?

And here is ABC:

Stoll AbC

There are 101 different articles and videos about Thamina and her family without mentioning who her dad is. Quite incredible really. And you call mainstream media people “journalists”? You’re having a laugh!

Meanwhile, the media don’t then interview her dad – you’d think they would considering just what had gone down in Nice but no, they would not wish to have the vast majority of people (who don’t read outside the mainstream if they read at all and just watch BBC. ITV. ABC etc etc) pick up on the fact it’s father and daughter (with a Knesset, Zionist, “ex” Lieutenant” of the IDF Intelligence services, mother) who took these videos and images. Attempting, desperately, to keep the two apart as separate events with entirely separate people behind the cameras.

And here she is with Daddy (by the way, I mention 22 years old above – I have seen articles where she is 18 and where she is 22) however, in this article (referred by Wikipedia), his “eldest daughter” is 21: “Whether Gutjahr would still recommend his children today, to become a journalist, Sandra Strüwing asked. The answer was slow in coming: “um ….”. In Gutjahrs eldest daughter, 21, it is already too late.” The strange thing is that Wikipedia itself states that he only has one son and one daughter: Gutjahr is the former Israeli since 2007 Knesset -Abgeordneten Einat Wilf married. [26 ] Gutjahr has a son (* 2010) and a daughter (* 1994). Perhaps lost in translation? 🙂

https://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Gutjahr&prev=search

Gutjahr and daughter

 

And here she is following Daddy on her Facebook page (while following both, the CEO and COO of Facebook – both jews):

Thamina following

And how about this one. While her father (and mother) get invited to the British House of Commons, Thamina, in the USA, gets her photo taken with the possible next President of the United States:

Thamina Stoll with Hillary

What a lucky little nonentity of a student eh?

And daddy at the House of Commons:

Gutjahr twitter Gutjahr invite to House of commons

 

As for what happened to the victims…. well, let’s put it this way, as soon as I seen the footage of the alleged shooter outside McDonald’s and the group of kids all running past him from around a corner, I said “They’ve been hanging around waiting for directions”. These kids were plants. Furthermore, you see an old guy walking toward the “shooter” and he seems to have no idea what’s going on and is caught up in it. His face (only his) is even blanked out in some video footage of it and in most images. I don’t think he was meant to be there.

Back to the “victims” – most of them were Kosovan or Turkish. “Here’s a few Euros, off you go and spend it well”.

Kids dead 1 Kids dead 2 Kids dead 3

“And shhh… don’t say a word!”

And that, my friends, is Einat Wolf’s “War of words and images”, kindly brought to you by the “Wilf” family.

Richard wonders how Journalists are going to make a living in this new age of internet, twitter and blogs. He knows damned well I assure you. It’s called DECEPTIVE PROPAGANDA MOSSAD, CIA, MI5, MI6, DVD style.

Oh and one last thing (which makes me laugh):

Munich Police respect

“Respect” 🙂 Well, unless you share controlled pics of the victims on ITV as above for example.

After all, the authorities don’t want too many pics of the victims floating around. Someone might recognise them in a McDonald’s one day!

That’s also why so many of these “shooters” end up “dead”.

 

 

The “Quiet” Shadow EU Parliament

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, Politics by earthlinggb on December 8, 2015

50876_detail_EUROPEAN JEWISH PARLIAMENT  2

Is it a CATHOLIC EU Parliament? No.

Is it a Muslim EU Parliament? No.

Is it a Christian EU Parliament? No.

Is it a Hindu EU Parliament? No.

Is it a Buddhist EU Parliament? No.

Would any ONE of these such things have you raise your eyebrows and think “Well that’s a bit discriminatory and just not on and what could be their agenda? And why would they be given the opportunity to create a shadow EU Parliament and talk of their demands within the EU and their policies?”

If it were a Muslim Parliament within the EU which, after its inauguration, took a trip to Mecca in Saudi Arabia and then came back to start work, wouldn’t you think “Are they taking commands from Saudi?” Imagine the outcry!

THINK ABOUT IT AND STOP IGNORING THIS SHIT AND MAKING EXCUSES FOR IT!

It is, of course, a JEWISH EU PARLIAMENT. Ever see it covered much on your TV? Not that jews are ever exactly quiet but when they want something well off the radar, they can be. How many people in Europe know that this even exists? VERY few!

Call me anti semitic all you wish but you’re just not getting it are you?

Tagged with:

Here’s a thing….. “Diversity”

Posted in Politics by earthlinggb on April 20, 2015

I’ve just set up a company and we’ve got contracts totalling £10M supplying technology to certain Enterprise sectors. The problem is, I need a CEO since I do not wish to be embroiled in the everyday running of the company. Our growth projections over the next 5 years are showing a conservative estimate of around 100% per annum.

Now, the trouble is, I’m worried about the possibility of a new Labour government coming in on the 7th May because I might be in a position where I have to find my new CEO from just 0.01%, or less, of the population. It appears that this is the approximate percentage of Black, secular jewish, homosexuals with dreadlocks and who subscribe to the rastafarian movement in this country. As you can see, this might cause me a slight issue if Labour win the election because they are determined to ensure that the UK’s population split of all sorts of particular types of people is reflected in the number of CEOs. Where the hell I might find a black, secular jewish, homosexual, dreadlocked rastafarian, who’s got the right credentials in our technology space and has run a company before, is anyone’s guess.

But then that doesn’t seem to be an issue for labour. ANY Black, secular jewish, homosexual, dreadlocked rastafarian will do. As long as we have that relative percentage of CEOs reflecting the population, everything is hunky dory it seems.

So, if you happen to be walking down Camden High Street and spot one, would you do me a favour and ask him if he wants a job as a CEO at a salary of £150K a year and £1M of stock options? Thanks.

YOU SEE. I HAVE THIS STRANGE FEELING THAT, WHERE OUR GOVERNMENT (AND ITS JUDICIARY WHICH ENFORCES ITS LEGISLATION) STATE THAT DISCRIMINATION IS CRIMINAL, THEY’RE ACTUALLY DISCRIMINATORY THEMSELVES AND ARE FEEDING US SHIT. HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT THAT? OR IS IT JUST ME?

Labour positive discrimination

A Planet for the president 2 1

Now, you see, it goes further and deeper than this. Not only does that positive discrimination come into play at the top end – and this discrimination covers a great deal I can assure you, just listen carefully to the video below – but it is throughout employment law.

You see, these politics – agenda ridden politics (and it isn’t just Labour I assure you) – infiltrate our judiciary, our courts, our employment law, right across the board. Now I don’t care if 99% of CEOs are black, white or Lesbian. I don’t care how many women are in top jobs in the government (another positive discrimination move to ensure this happens) or whether muslims have more councillors in London than white guys. AS LONG AS these people are put in these positions due to capability AND having the mindset of achieving whatever for the sake of ALL UK human beings (I don’t like the words “persons” or “citizens” for very obvious reasons if you read my blogs at all on the “legal person” issue). BUT, this agenda where, no matter what, the numbers of certain groups in certain positions of power in this country MUST reflect their percentage of population, is TOTAL AGENDA RIDDEN BULLSHIT!

I tell you what – If the government wants this, then let’s ask them to do a survey of the number of jews (secular or otherwise) in the House of Lords, the House of commons, the CEOs in our media, banks and Corporations. THEN let them work out the relative percentage of THESE people to their percentage of population. If it’s too low, put more in. If it’s too high, sack some of the fcukers! Get the picture? THEN there may be more positions available for, not only blacks but also white, straight christian males OR females?

AFTER ALL, IF YOU WANT A MORE APPROPRIATE PERCENTAGE TO REFLECT POPULATION, THAT GOES BOTH WAYS DOESN’T IT?

OR DOES IT?

DOES IT HELL!

And here’s another thing: While we hear the cries of “racial minorities” and muslims and homosexuals and whatever minority group you’d like to think of, shouting for THEIR proportional representation in positions which reflect their numbers in society, it’s funny but you never hear the jewish crew shouting about that do you? Any chance, then, that this is because, if they did, the rest of us would say “YOU HAVE GOT TO BE FCUKING JOKING!”

And another thing. Can you imagine this black Shadow Secretary, Chuka Umunna, complaining on behalf of white people if the tables were turned?

What is it this guy wants? The white guy saying “Yes Massa!”?

Take your positive discrimination Chuka and chuk it up your arse!

I’m not the racist Chuka – YOU ARE!

 

Here, take this: “Your problem is, is that you don’t have enough in your armoury. You’re not a racial minority, a sexual minority, a pregnant woman….. or ANYTHING REALLY”

I just happen to be a Straight, white male! And guess what happens to them in law? Don’t talk to me about “diversity” and “equality” you bunch of corrupt pricks!

Breach of contract but, as the Barrister says, “You’re not a black, gay pregnant woman!”… so you’re screwed!

Now, ANY of you pricks out there want to debate “DIVERSITY” with me? Bring it on!

And people wonder why people like Nigel Farage talk about “British people first”? And he’s not even saying ONLY white! And neither am I. But YOU bastards are!

 

So then let’s take a look at Sturgeon and her band of Progressives shall we? Let’s see what’s driving these points in the SNP’s manifesto……

 

“Och aye! We’re PROGRESSIVE!”

Unfortunately, half or more of the numpties in this country think “progressive” sounds good! “PROGRESS! AYE I’M AW FUR THAT! AND I’M INTAE PROGRESSIVE ROCK TOO! IN FACT MAYBE THIS IS THE GENESIS OF A NEW POLITICS!”

Arsehole! You haven’t got a goddamned clue what progressive means in this case!

But you don’t think that there is any agenda behind this “diversity” and “progressive” politics do you? Of course, if you’re female, you’ll say “Damn yeah I want 50/50!” and if you’re an immigrant or racial minority, you’ll say much the same. Of COURSE you will! But what you are doing is saying “to hell with who’s best for the job”. It could WELL be you but then again it may not.

So, welcome to the machine!

Diversity machine

Diversity 2

Diversity 3

Diversity 4

 

When I say Sturgeon and her SNP cronies are CHANGE AGENTS, I mean it! And she’s doing it all on behalf of a European Union that wants the UK broken up into WEE pieces so that it can more easily assimilate the parts into the Superstructure of the Superstate.

That is why you have SNP ready to fight tooth and nail to stop the British population, in any way it can, from having a vote for an in/out referendum on EU membership. She (they) will pull ANY trick to create divide so that the UK has no strength left to stand against the EU.

YOUR SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT DOES NOT WANT INDEPENDENCE AND SOVEREIGNTY. IT IS USING THE ATTACK ON WESTMINSTER TO HAVE YOU BELIEVE THEY DO BUT THEY CANNOT GIVE YOU INDEPENDENCE WHEN THEY ARE SLOTTING YOU INTO THE EU!

I DARE YOU TO DEMAND YOUR BELOVED STURGE TO GIVE YOU A REFERENDUM ON IT. THEN SEE HOW MUCH SHE LISTENS TO YOU!

SNP man 3

Now read your SNP manifesto points about “Diversity”, “Immigration” and “Equality”. And consider this: Re the economic needs associated with educating foreign students and, at their choosing, allowing them to have work visas afterwards – how about the Scottish government just ensure the education improves during the school years of our own children so that they fill our university places rather than foreigners? Or is it that your scottish government just think you’re too thick?

SNP man 1 SNP man 2

 

NICOLA STURGEON = AN EU TOOL

AND WHEN YOU CONSIDER JUST HOW MUCH THE MEDIA, GENERALLY, ARE HYPING HER AND SNP (EVEN THE “HATED” BBC) IT MAKES SENSE BECAUSE THE MEDIA ARE A BIG PART OF THE ESTABLISHMENT AND THE ESTABLISHMENT WANT THE EU.

SO BLOODY TRANSPARENT – EXCEPT TO THE SNP VOTERS!

 

PROGRESSIVE INDEED. THE FRANKFURT (AND TAVISTOCK) SCHOOL OF HUMAN RELATIONS! 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year, brainwashing you and confusing the shit out of you!

Please also read “Sturgeon and Tavistock”

Oh and last thing:

 

“The Rockefeller Foundation is proud to support this important survey to explore the country’s views on our changing demographics,” said John Irons, Managing Director, Foundation Initiatives, at The Rockefeller Foundation. “With our growing diversity comes a great deal of opportunity if we harness it effectively. The poll that we are releasing today gives us much to be optimistic about, with the majority of Americans seeing incredible opportunity as a result of our country’s rising diversity—and actually viewing it as a critical factor to our nation’s economic growth. We hope that this poll sparks increased conversation and ultimately increases action on both the local and national policy level to ensure that growing diversity equals growing opportunity as well.”

Washington, D.C. — New public opinion research conducted by the Center for American Progress and PolicyLink and funded by the Rockefeller Foundation found that Americans are much more open to diversity and supportive of steps to reduce inequalities between racial and ethnic groups than is commonly portrayed in politics and the media. The Latino Decisions study included close to 3,000 Americans, who shared their opinions on diversity, inequality, the role of government, and opportunity in America.

https://www.americanprogress.org/press/release/2013/10/22/77689/release-poll-shows-americans-embracing-diversity-and-strongly-supporting-steps-to-reduce-racial-and-ethnic-inequality/

Aye it all emanates from those bastards once again. But then what doesn’t?

Sturgeon and Tavistock

Posted in Politics by earthlinggb on April 18, 2015

Nicola-Sturgeon-Aberdeen

First of all, I’ll be upfront – I don’t like this “wee nippy sweetie” called Sturgeon.

As a “woman” she needs some botox on her top lip (or, perhaps a moustache) but even that wouldn’t help.

Screencaps-rab-c-nesbitt-12361996-449-360

Also, I hear continuously in her voice (and I’m scottish) an aggressive arrogance while selling my scottish brethren bullshit. She knows, as much as any other “leader”, that the monetary system and the “economy” she speaks of, is built upon a basic lie – that lie being that banks create money. That lie being that there has to be a National debt. She also lies when she uses the word “independence”. But the SNP followers simply never listen to sense or logic. You cannot have independence while part of the EU.2952222_953710d6d3_m

At this point, however, I wish to alert you to her comments re migration in the video below. It is extremely interesting to hear her speak about the need for migration into Scotland. A lot of the migration we have seen into the UK has been into areas of England. She seems to wish to increase the population of Scotland (then ask the scots to have more babies no? Ah, no. That’s not the idea. The idea is a political one for political aims. She’s looking to do a “Labour” migration policy into Scotland). She talks of having a “sensible migration policy”. Isn’t that precisely what UKIP are suggesting? Or is her “sensible” ideas not quite the same? What does she mean by a “sensible migration policy”? She does not elaborate here. It would be interesting to know would it not? And how does she intend to enforce that when we all know it is the EU (which SNP say Scotland will be “Independent” within) which determines such policy? Her comments come at around the 22 minute mark.vubery8a

The woman is full of shit (as was Salmond). And no, I’m not coming from the perspective of supporting any other Political Party because I support none of them. They are ALL full of shit. That said, if I still were in the “matrix” of believing in the system, my vote would go to UKIP, but I’m not. UKIP is as much zionist controlled as the rest of the parties. That’s why there is a UKIP “Friends of Israel” and that’s why Farage met Murdoch. The people who steer ALL of these parties lurk quietly (and in Murdoch’s case, not so quietly) behind the scenes. But Murdoch, himself, isn’t even a decision maker; he is an enabler through his media and he works for the decision makers.

 

Sturgeon talks at UCL TAVISTOCK School of Public Policy.

Our aims
To influence public policy through high quality academic research;
The School acts as the bridge between UCL’s world-class research and the policy-making community in Britain and internationally.
The School’s academic discipline is political science, including the fields of international relations and political theory. From 2001, the School has built up a core faculty of many academic staff across these fields, with a Department of Political Science coming formally into being in 2005. In addition the Constitution Unit specialises in constitutional reform and comparative constitutional studies.

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/aboutus

It’s not just a University – it’s a Think Tank. And if you know Tavistock at all, then I need say no more.
Why does Sturgeon feel it necessary to “sell” Scottish Independence to a University in London? I’ll leave you to consider that.

 

Tavistock Institute Of Human Relations

(layer of The Committee of 300)

This group was formed at Oxford University, London, by the Royal Institute of Of International Affairs in 1922. Major John Rawlings Reese, a British Army technician, was instructed to set up the largest brainwashing facility in the world at the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations as a part of Sussex University.

This became the core of Britain’s Psychological Warfare Bureau. It was Tavistock-designed methods that got the United States into the Second World War and which, under the guidance of Dr. Kurt Lewin, established the OSS, the forerunner of the CIA. Lewin became the director of the Strategic Bombing Survey, which was a plan for the Royal Air Force to concentrate on bombing German worker housing while leaving military targets, such as munition plants, alone. The munition plants on both sides belonged to the international bankers who had no wish to see their assets destroyed. The idea behind saturation bombing of civilian worker housing was to break the morale of the German worker.

It was not designed to affect the war effort against the German military machine. Lewin and his team of actuaries reached a target figure, that if 65% of German worker housing was destroyed by nightly RAF bombing, the morale of the civilian population would collapse. The actual document was prepared by the Pru-dential Assurance Company. The RAF, under the command of “Bomber” Harris, carried out Lewin’s plans, culminating in the terror firestorm bombing of Dresden, in which over 125,000, mainly old men, women and children, were killed.

The truth of “Bomber” Harris’s horror raids on German civilians was a well kept secret until long after the end of WW II. Today its primary mission is to establish a global brainwashing and opinion forming network. This institute is the originator of the Aquarian Conspiracy, designed to weaken the nations of the world by encouraging drug use, free sex, homosexuality and lesbianism. It has been very successful in the United States. It works through many research institutes and think tanks. The principal ones in the United States are the Stanford Research Institute, Rand Research and Development Corporation, the Institute For Policy Studies, the Aspen Institute, the Hudson Institute, and the Brookings Institute. Tavistock runs over 30 research institutions in the United States.

These Tavistock-U.S. institutions have in many cases grown into gargantuan monsters, penetrating every aspect of our government agencies and taking command of all policy making. One of Tavistock’s chief wreckers of our way of life was Dr. Alexander King, a founder member of NATO and a favorite with the Committee of 300, as well as an outstanding member of the Club of Rome.

When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO. For Five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund. Dr. King was assigned by the Club of Rome to destroy America’s education by taking control of the National Teachers Association and working in close conjunction with certain law makers and judges. Scientists engaged in the process of conditioning are called “social engineers” or “new-science social scientists” and they play an integral part in what we see, hear and read. The “old school” social engineers were Kurt K. Lewin, Professor Hadley Cantril, Margaret Meade, Professor Derwin Cartwright and Professor Lipssitt who, together with John Rawlings Reese, made up the backbone of new-science scientists at Tavistock Institute.

 

According to its website, the Institute engages in educational, research, and consultancy work in the social sciences and applied psychology. Its clients are chiefly public sector organizations, including the European Union, several British government departments, and some private clients. The Institute owns Human Relations, the international social sciences journal. It also edits the journal Evaluation.

Kurt Lewin, a member of the Frankfurt school in America, was an important influence on the work of the Tavistock, according to Eric Trist, who expresses his admiration for Lewin in his autobiography.Kurt Lewin

Lewin had originally been involved with schools of behavioral psychology before changing directions in research and undertaking work with psychologists of the Gestalt school of psychology, including Max Wertheimer and Wolfgang Kohler. He also joined the Psychological Institute of the University of Berlin where he lectured and gave seminars on both philosophy and psychology. Lewin often associated with the early Frankfurt School, originated by an influential group of largely Jewish Marxists at the Institute for Social Research in Germany. But when Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933 the Institute members had to disband, moving to England and then to America. In that year, he met with Eric Trist, of the London Tavistock Clinic. Trist was impressed with his theories and went on to use them in his studies on soldiers during the Second World War.

Prominent psychologists mentored by Kurt Lewin included Leon Festinger (1919–1989), who became known for his cognitive dissonance theory (1956).

Change process
An early model of change developed by Lewin described change as a three-stage process. The first stage he called “unfreezing”. It involved overcoming inertia and dismantling the existing “mind set”. It must be part of surviving. Defense mechanisms have to be bypassed. In the second stage the change occurs. This is typically a period of confusion and transition. We are aware that the old ways are being challenged but we do not have a clear picture as to what we are replacing them with yet. The third and final stage he called “freezing”. The new mindset is crystallizing and one’s comfort level is returning to previous levels. This is often misquoted as “refreezing” (see Lewin,1947).

What the UK is currently ongoing is that “change” and it is being managed – not by the political parties presented to you, but by organisations which have been put in place to dramatically re-orient society across every element of its fabric.

We’re now seeing debates for the General Election – not based upon left and right politics so much (Labour and Conservative – because, in fact, there is no difference between them) but based upon SEVEN parties. Think about it. This is unheard of in UK politics. Not only that but the main three parties are now finding themselves becoming less and less relevant to the electorate. Why? Do you think that WE, the populace, have achieved this? Do you think WE have pressured the media to have 7 different representatives on our debates?

Not in your dreams! This is for the purpose of redefining what Britain is while having you believe there is a voice (an MP) somewhere in Her Majesty’s government, speaking for you on some subject. While the real power behind it all is still in power. You’re being had!

STURGEON ISN’T IN CONTROL OF SCOTLAND’S FATE. THE ROYAL INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE, THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, CIA (YES the CIA) and HER MAJESTIC ONE are!

STURGEBUM is nothing but another “Right Honourable member of the Privy Council, CHANGE AGENT.

You want a single party government? Have one! You want Communism in the UK? Have it!

CBnbU_DWgAAn1Jo.jpg-large

 

Oh and one last thing Sturge:

SNP’s “Named Person” legislation for all children from birth to what is it? 18 years old?

Named person

So, while the Scottish SNP government believe that 16 and 17 year olds need a state guardian (of course they do. Just to make sure the state ensures their brainwashing), it seems Nickelarse believes they are sufficiently adult and capable to vote for the future of the country!

Announcing the measure as part of the The Scottish Referendum (Franchise) Bill earlier this year, Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said young people had the biggest stake in the future of the country.

16 yr old vote

 

FULL OF HYPOCRITICAL SHITE LIKE THE REST NICOLA. AS LONG AS THE DECISIONS ARE TO YOUR PERCEIVED BENEFIT.

SCOTLAND: THE “NANNY STATE” OF THE WORLD. AND NICOLA IS “BIG SISTER”!

Be careful what you vote for. You might just get it! The sheer fact that you still vote at all guarantees you’ll get it!

The Monetary System

Posted in Money, Politics by earthlinggb on April 5, 2015

I WANT TO SEE THE “WHITES” OF UKIP’s EYES!

Gerald O'Brien UKIP

Gerald O’Brien UKIP

 

Dear Mr Taylor,

I have created a “Change.org” petition regarding the need for a discussion/debate around the issue of money issuance in the UK. Please see the link:

https://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-david-cameron-mp-nicola-sturgeon-to-provide-the-uk-electorate-with-a-public-televised-assessment-and-debate-regarding-the-issuance-of-currency-within-the-united-kingdom-2

On your website, it is stated:

SOMETHING TO SAY TO US?

Do you want to tell us anything?

Ask a question? Complain about something?

Get us to do something for you?

Whatever it is, we value your input and will always respond.

Contact:

Norman Taylor (chairman UK Ashford branch)

Tel: 01233 822 132

Email: normantaylor@email.com

What I would like you, and all members of the UKIP party to do, is sign this petition. While I speak of a solution to the problem known as “Mathematically Perfected Economy”, I realise many people will not be accustomed with the term and, as such, I am not asking that people support the implementation of it but simply that they support the necessity for there being a public discussion of the matter of money issuance. From this, it would then be possible to assess and discuss in greater detail, how money works presently and how that is the underlying issue which impacts every facet of life from austerity to war. All wars are resource wars in one form or another. The reason for such is due to the debt interest applied to nations and the fact that the interest portion of the debt does not circulate in any economy. Since it does not, it is necessary for nations to compete but not only compete but to war. The only way for one nation to pay off (or, I should say, continue to service) its debt is by acquiring the principle of another nation’s economy.
The accumulation of wealth by the few is through what is, in fact, insider trading. The use of Hedge funds and other vehicles make this possible.
Alan Greenspan joined Paulson & Co just before the crash in 2008 (he joined around Jan 2007) and advise Paulson on the mortgage market (insider knowledge of course) and Paulson’s Hedge Fund made a killing (one of the largest if not THE largest gains a HF had ever made) by shorting the market.
In addition, on this side of the Atlantic, Ken Clarke joined Centaurus Hedge Fund around the same time.

Nigel-Farage-Ukip-Debate-Nigel-Farage-TV-Debate-Political-Parties-Debate-On-TV-551204
Our Cabinet Ministers, Prime Ministers and Corporations and Banks, write the legislation which they obviously know will impact certain industries and even nations. People like Tony Blair (and many others) then, having pushed through legislation on others’ behalf then find themselves paid off by being provided with jobs with the like of J.P.Morgan. None of this is difficult to comprehend or see.
I could write a script on this but I will stop there. I’ll just end by saying that it is the present monetary system whereby banks issue currency (not create it) and charge interest upon money they don’t actually have (thereby they bring no consideration to the contract/loan) but have been given a legal privilege to issue. That interest does not exist anywhere in any economy, therefore, it is easily seen why and how all countries are in debt. There is a net global debt which is actually impossible to exist unless there is some entity which that debt is owed to. That debt is due to interest and due to the fact that both, governments and individuals all have to use a form of currency which is legally owned by a global banking system. The fact is that it is individuals who create money (its value) and that banks are unnecessary middlemen in any transaction between two individuals. All banks do to make a profit is demand that our promissory obligations to one another go through their system and they “re-present” these obligations to one another with their versions (electronic or cash) of our promissory notes.
They obfuscate the true nature of what is going on and it is, in fact, outright fraud.

Billboard3
I would appreciate your, and Gerald O’Brien’s response to this. I would hope UKIP would positively support such a discussion since it is this issue which is causing many of the symptoms your party and this country is concerned about.
Regards,

PS: I have a background in both, University level Physics and Business Studies.

 

Of course I understand what I will get (if anything) is some wooly worded thank you and “that’s interesting” and “UKIP are committed to….” etc.

Just wanted it on record. Another party (of the people) ignore the real issues and core problem.

Because to be a party, you must adhere to the establishment rules otherwise you would never BE a party (or last as one).

All good fun! Keep putting your X in the box. After all, that’s how they see you – as an X, a thumb print, an idiot.

OFCOM decide! UKIP is a party!

Posted in Politics by earthlinggb on March 17, 2015

Just a quick one. I have to laugh (and do).

Here we see OFCOM deciding if UKIP is worth calling a major party. You don’t decide kippers, the British establishment does! And yet you think that UKIP fight the British establishment because that’s what Mr Farage tells you!

And you swallow it!

It reminds me of David Icke and his “We will be unregulated” (when speaking of the People’s Voice”). Indeed Dave and indeed Nigel. Two men who talk absolute shite!

But you will continue to because the British public (the majority at least) are really dumb bitches!

Ofcom decides

 

OFCOM RECOGNISES UKIP!

“Oh thank you your majesty!”

Ahhh why the hell do I bother!

SMELL the desperation!

Posted in New World Order Religion, Politics by earthlinggb on February 9, 2015

If it was truly about hate crime and racism then it would cover all “hate” and all “racism”. But it doesn’t. It’s all about this bullshit called “anti semitism” (but what is a semite? It certainly isn’t a caucasian from Khazar or Eastern Europe commonly known as AshkeNAZI and it certainly isn’t a christian or any other type of zionist.) So what is it they are REALLY protecting?

It’s the information! The one thing you need to do when you cannot argue the facts and disprove them and when you must cover up the lie, is hit the “kill” switch so that the information cannot be spread. They can’t control it and they are DESPERATE to do so! It’s the ONLY way!

You allow them to and you are signing your own journey into sheer hell however. Mark my words!

Trolls anti semitism

http://rt.com/uk/230547-anti-semitism-internet-trolls/

“You don’t have to be jewish to be a zionist!” as the jew smiles in acknowledgement because he knows a zionist need not be a jew. But the British MPs and European establishment – hen-pecked by the jewish lobby – think zionism equates to jewishness. But then they have to try and maintain that lie but, like all lies, it exposes itself in the end. Not to give the jews a “get out of jail card” of course because they do not stand up and speak out generally. Why? Because zionism = judaism has served them well overall for decades! To the tune of $billions!

So, they state that using “zionism” is a cloak for anti semitism? Hmmm… They cannot get out of this one! If Joe Biden was the only zionist on the planet, I would stand against him. How could I be this fabled “anti semite” then? He’s no jew!

But they will use and abuse this term to the very end. I just hope it is the very end of them! And any true, honest, fair minded and non ignorant, thinking person on this planet will know exactly what I mean by that. Of course some won’t but only because they have an agenda of either BEING zionist OR, such as in the case of Jim Murphy for example – they do well out of supporting and protecting the zionists. Don’t you Jim?

Murphy Israel

 

But what is it that the vast majority of British, European and American/Canadian/Western politicians love about “Israel”? Why, of all the countries around the world, is Israhell of so much importance? Because of this thing called the bible? Then if it were that, then our politicians are bringing religion into politics! (well I never!!). But if they say it isn’t that, then what?

Well, as we keep trying to explain – “Mr Rothschild” (the family) and “Mr Rockefeller” (the family) and a few other jewish/zionist families OWN this neck of the woods called “The West” (yes I know, on paper, the Rockefellers aren’t jewish – but then neither is Joe Biden or Tony Blair! ;-))

BUT, it’s all just “Conspiracy theory” isn’t it? 😉

You gotta laugh!