I’d love to hear some of your comments on this article. It just blows my tiny little mind! 🙂
Last words? “Perhaps we should have called Larry Silverstein!”
How much do you think NASA insures its Space Shuttles for?
But these humans are “heroes” and paid between $56K and $86K each? (That’s US Dollars by the way – not even Pounds!). Then think of the Private Military in Iraq etc. Paid WAY more and far better insurance. Who believes this crap? If it’s true, these “Astronauts” weren’t particularly sharp were they? Oh but they did it for “the love of exploration and mankind” – my ass!
NASA Had No Special Insurance for Astronauts
Columbia crew covered by standard life plans offered to military and federal employees.
February 10, 2003|From Associated Press
NEW YORK — The Americans who died aboard the space shuttle Columbia were eligible for the standard life insurance offered to military personnel and federal employees, but NASA carried no special coverage specifically for astronauts, officials say.
“There is a limit on what type of benefits the federal government provides,” said NASA spokeswoman Eileen Hawley.
“We look at this as larger than a monetary issue,” she said. “We are committed to helping these families and we have a support network. They are … going to be part of the NASA family.”
Five of the astronauts were members of the U.S. military and eligible for coverage under service members group life insurance, which has a standard death benefit of $250,000. The monthly premium ranges from $20 for the maximum coverage to 80 cents for a reduced coverage of $10,000. There is no increased payment for military members if the death is work-related.
NASA and military officials would not disclose if the five had elected coverage and at what level.
The military does provide the surviving spouse $935 a month, plus an additional $234 per child until age 18. It also provides other benefits such as $6,000 in cash for immediate needs and up to $6,900 for burial costs and housing allowances. These benefits are provided regardless of how the service member died.
NASA provides the surviving spouse half the deceased’s salary, plus $24,354 annually — but that applies only to the lone civilian astronaut, Kalpana Chawla. NASA is not disclosing salaries of the victims, but the agency says an astronaut’s salary can range from $56,247 to $86,974.
As a NASA employee, Chawla was eligible for coverage under Federal Employees Group Life Insurance, which provides basic coverage equal to the individual’s annual salary, plus $2,000. It allows the worker to increase coverage up to $200,000 by paying more in premiums.
NASA officials said they believe Israeli astronaut Ilan Ramon, the only non-American aboard Columbia when the shuttle broke apart Feb. 1, would have had life insurance coverage through his service in the Israeli Air Force, but had no details. Israel’s Defense Department declined to comment.
The 12 children of the Columbia astronauts will also be able to receive assistance from the Space Shuttle Children’s Trust Fund. The private, nonprofit fund raised about $1.2 million after the 1986 Challenger explosion to provide for the needs of the astronauts’ children.
Just to say, I’ve got a few more things I intend to post re Apollo (from newspapers of the 1960s) which really will have you raise your eyebrows. Me? I KNOW NASA have not landed men on the moon (while I’ve ben surprised recently by finding other people I would have thought would scoff at such an idea, actually agree) but a lot still believe. Well, let’s just say, for now, that the astronauts had a few issues re what they thought of the LEM while, unknown to Americans and the rest of us, there was also a secret agreement being negotiated between the Americans and Russians IN the 1960s regarding collaboration. It didn’t happen of course (or so we’re led to believe) but the info did leak out.
Also, it was stated quite strongly in American newspapers that some thought (in the business) that Russia’s gains were all propaganda and not real. Yes indeed. I think the same goes for NASA too. For all those that say “If Russia knew the moon landings were fake….” etc, I’m saying they were all in it together. Apollo-Soyuz indeed!
The apollo Astronauts’ “Insurance covers” (autographed postcards that it was assumed would be able to be sold by their families if they died) – Really? You think? That’s what NASA ‘gave’ as “insurance” to their heroes families??
From reading the above two articles, I’ll just say this for now – NASA’s astroNOTS are either 1. Not the brightest sparks or 2. There’s really no danger because they ain’t going nowhere! 😉 I go for the latter myself.
TOMMY ROBINSON: Preaching his Muslim hate to all that will listen – the ignorants, the simple racists who REFUSE to accept that their “Muslim threat” is actually a jewish one. Same for Alex Jones and Paul Watson etc. Pure shite! That is what they are. As is Trump as is every last MP, Lord, Senator and Congressman in the two major western governments of the UK and USA – not to mention Germany, France etc.
Good video explaining Robinson while also explaining how/why Nick Griffin would be demonised in Britain. By whom? WHO DO YOU THINK?
Thanks to New World Agenda on youtube for his intelligence. Thank GOD there are others who understand this.
It really is very simple to uncover those who are under jewish control. You just need to peel back one layer of the onion. Clear as day.
But here’s another thing: You see, 99.9% of people in this country and in the USA get their news and understanding of the world and politics from “in the box” media (and no, don’t think Trump is actually going to make a positive difference – he is NOT). What proportion of the population, do you think, read such things as “Foreign Affairs” or papers by the “CATO Institute”? I’ll tell you: MUCH less than 1% of the population. Perhaps less than 0.1%. Perhaps even less!
So, are you going to enlighten yourself at this point? Are you going to take a few minutes to allow your jaw to drop? Than be my guest:
Here is the enlightenment written in Foreign Affairs (the author is jewish by the way) – Written in 1992! It’s been the agenda for years because your government NEEDS an enemy to keep you in dear and also to completely change the social structure AND to even out incomes across the world (haven’t you noticed western salaries are essentially the same as they were in the late 1990s?). The globalists (and yes Trump is STILL one I assure you. He can bring back jobs now to the USA BECAUSE your wages have been brought closer to par with the east. He’ll go further to stifle incomes to ensure the corporations start to invest again in America BUT the overall wealth will NOT go into YOUR pocket!) have needed and wanted that “par” on salaries across the world for obvious reasons!
OR, read it in the CATO Institute paper –
CREATING the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat (READ the damned thing!)
Creating it! Is that CLEAR enough for some puny little brains out there?
“Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain. “It’s big; it’s scary; it’s anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and discontent,” wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam “spreads across vast swaths of the globe that can be colored green on the television maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red.””
“The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious “sources” and unnamed officials who leak information, float trial balloons, and warn about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions taking place within government. Their information is then augmented by colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorial terrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named and other villains. The media end up finding corroboration from foreign sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S. government and help the press uncover further information substantiating the threat coming from the new bad guys.
In addition, think tanks studies and op-ed pieces add momentum to the official spin. Their publication is followed by congressional hearings, policy conferences, and public press briefings. A governmental policy debate ensues, producing studies, working papers, and eventually doctrines and policies that become part of the media’s spin. The new villain is now ready to be integrated into the popular culture to help to mobilize public support for a new crusade. In the case of the Green Peril, that process has been under way for several months.”
So WHO is creating it?
Well, let a “little old lady” tell you:
Do yourself a favour and educate yourself or you will be “howling at the moon” (and the wrong group) for the rest of your life wondering why things don’t change!
“Christian Zionists” indeed! You bunch of ignorant, easily led, idiots!
But now, to wrap it up, bring in British politics and the ever so quiet – and darker – side of things. In the following piece, Peter Mandelson talks of the “mistake” made and the effect of “searching for immigrants” and he suggests it was a Labour idea. This is what the establishment wish you to believe as they will also suggest something else was a “Tory idea” etc. It keeps you blaming one side for something while supporting the other side. It keeps you believing in the “fight” between left and right. BUT, the reality is that there IS no fight. While you’re looking in one direction and debating an issue with your opposite political foe, the establishment is carrying on with its agenda. You see, Peter here is a Rothschild man through and through (as is dear old Prince Charlie – see previous blogs of mine). Remember the Rothschilds also “pimped” Tony Blair out to the banking sector (JP Morgan) after his stint at 10 Downing Street while Tony talks glowingly about Israel. It’s also interesting he converted to catholicism not too long before the jesuit took the reigns.
However, back to Mandelson: He’s doing what the little old lady above states would be done and that jews would be behind because it is exactly what Rothschild – the globalist and the man who built Israel – wanted. An immigration flood into the UK (and the US). Lots of Muslims and Mexicans and anyone else they could get their mits on. Why? Simple: Dilute the white race from Europe and the US – mix the races all up. And which one is left “PURE”? And you thought HITLER was for a pure race? Well he was BECAUSE of this other one but Hitler had NOTHING on these guys! 🙂 Ever heard of “projection”? Where what someone says about another is actually a reflection of themselves? Well relate that to those who were. we’re told, “persecuted” by the “mad german” and you’ve got your answer. However, it must be understood that we are not talking about an entire race here, but just the Rothschilds, the International, atheist jews in political and financial power and all the little underlings (like Trump and Blair and Merkel and many more plus thousands of “elites”). The jewish man or woman in the street (even though they are “loyal” to their tribe, will get flushed away just like any of us if it suits their masters. After all, that is precisely what the zionists did during WW2 to most of the german and polish jews because it was useful to them to ensure enough support at the end of the war for them to achieve their state of Israel.
Mandelson talks immigration:
He’s not going to come out with the REAL reason for god’s sakes!
The a little piece on his relationship with the Rothschilds.
Don’t be a fool. When it comes to news and media, you’re just told the bullet points and it’s wrapped up in coated candy for you to sell you a pre-determined narrative that you can argue till the cows come home with the neighbours.
Learn the REAL agendas behind the stories by peeling back layers and seeing the connections.
Remain an ignorant twat! 😉
See post regarding Einat Wilf and the Nice attack. She puts her point over ever so well.
This deception is now becoming one big yawn. Obviously not for those who don’t understand it however or who just hate muslims for the hell of it. Ignorance kills – Indeed it does!
And, just for further enlightenment:
“It’s easy to put a truck bomb, as WE did, in London”
Now watch the SAME ex Mossad guy admitting these Israelis were spies on 9/11 (the “Dancing Israelis” if you haven’t already done your homework on these guys). And the last point about letting them go on the basis that “Israel no longer spies on America WITHOUT PERMISSION”, is absolutely, mind-boggingly, hilarious!
And finally this. But, of course, all you little jewish apologists will claim “anti semitic canard” and “coincidence”. Go for it!
Keep hating on those nasty muslims! lol
I have blogged about the two major control factors which run this world – Money (the reality of it) and Law (the “legal personality”) for many years now.
Unfortunately, there is scant interest from the vast majority of the “unwashed masses” who forever wonder why things never get any better while they vote “left” out and “Right” in and vice versa for decades and centuries. They complain, they bitch and moan and EVERYTIME the controllers offer up a “New Messiah” speaking words that resonate with them (that is what they do and always have), those “great unwashed” swallow it all, gobble it up and, for a while, get all excited at the prospect – and forlorn hope (hope is ALL you ever get) – of change.
However, there never will be any. Why? Because as you have just shown once more, you’re so easily led into believing AGAIN that the new guy in the Oval Office really is “change”. I could go into why he’s not but that is not the point of this blog.
The point of this blog is to bring it to your attention, once more, that there are people in this world – even today – who know there is no need for the existing money system and that it is, in fact, a con and the scourge of humanity. It is the reason for all our ills, our depressions, our desperation, our murders, hate, anger and wars. Not ALL but most. Some will say “No, it’s religion” but what is organised religion? It is all to do with spiritual and temporal power over masses and that power is gained by riches (money). Remember, money is just a means, it is not the end goal.
This post is called “A ‘New’ Money system” but, in fact, it is not new at all. It has always been known of, just never put into practice because, if it were, those who have ruled would rule no more. The “legal personality” is the mechanism, in law, by which those who own and control the money system today, have been able to “engineer” it.
Yes, there are “bloodlines” and these bloodlines must maintain and further their power to the point that “The meek shall inherit the earth”. The “meek” is not you and I. The “meek” (in THEIR bible) is them.
So, onto the articles worth reading:
Well, first, let me re-post one of the most significant and telling responses from the US Federal Reserve Chairman ever put on record:
He doesn’t say HOW, of course, but he DOES say “Yes” it is possible for a nation to have a currency without a national debt. And it is NOT just because private banks could issue it. Private Banks are “legal persons”. YOU are a “legal person” (ignore, for the moment, that the legal person itself is a con). The point right now is that a LEGAL PERSON (of any nature) CAN ISSUE MONEY – so YOU can! This is not a theory, it is a FACT!
Now, to President Roosevelt:
Bighamton Press, Sept 14th 1934.
Just as a Corporation is given “Legal Personality” by the law/Government, Trade Unions also are afforded “legal personality”. You would think the, therefore, that ALL persons are equal before the law right? WRONG! Why? Well those who are the majority Stakeholders in Corporations also have majority stakes in Banks and the Federal Reserve Private Banks. So who do you think has the say toward government and the power of money behind them? You have to understand that Roosevelt knew this. He was not a stupid man! So while he talked a good talk…..
Now to Woodrow Wilson: An article from not long before he became President and ushered in the Federal Reserve Act.
From “The Sun” September 25th 1910 (not the British rag):
“Guilt is always PERSONal” but the Corporation IS a “person” in law, therefore, those who truly own and control the Banks (also “persons) and Corporations are as if they are protected by the greatest of force fields. They can direct policies of any nature which is anti – public or individual or environmental and it is PEOPLE who drive these policies. Yet, it is the Corporation itself (a fictitious “person” existing by means of its own “birth certificate”, the Articles of Incorporation agreed to by the State) which is sued – if at all. A Corporation cannot be committed to jail for fraud or any other crime but the actual flesh and blood persons could IF this “force field” was removed.
Did Woodrow Wilson remove it while President? Not at all. In fact, he strengthened it plus he oversaw the introduction of the Federal Reserve and the IRS!
So now, let’s turn to E.C.Riegel – a name that many will not have heard of (but you MAY have heard of a man by the name of Mike Montagne who has claimed the originator of the MPE – Mathematically Perfected Economy – idea). No doubt Mr Montagne has worked on the idea for many years in great detail but the reality of money was known to many others – well known and not so well known – many years/decades, perhaps even centuries beforehand. The above indicate why such a money system has never been allowed to be put in place. The following describes what that money system, essentially, is.
THE MONETARY PHILOSOPHY OF E.C.RIEGEL:
- For a Person to exert Money Power is natural and wholesome (for “person” assume individual and that no such “Corporate Persons” exist).
- For the state to exert Money Power is unnatural and perverse.
- Until the state acquired Money Power, the state was, at worst, a parasite upon the economy; with the Money Power, it became a perverter of the economy. Men no longer merely tolerated it, they sought the exercise of the money power in their favour.
- Thus, man’s attitude toward the state and the state’s power over man were completely altered.
- Out of man’s motive of winning benefits from the state grew various political “ideologies” designed to screen the acquisitive purposes of their proponents.
- Thus the acquisition of the money power by the state marked a politico-economic revolution as it gave to the state the power, through fiscal policy, to control the economy and turned men’s minds from private enterprise to methods of its political control and perversion.
- Our present type of state should be identified as the monetary state and distinguished from the pre-monetary state.
- Money power exerted by the state is inescapably perverse; the monetary state is a frustrator of all aims of economic and political liberty.
- In the exercise of the money power, the state is driven inevitably from the libertarian forms of democracy and republicanism to the autarchic forms of fascism, socialism and communism.
- These are distinguished only by the manner in which the state’s money power is exercised but derived from one theory – that the exertion of money power is a function of the state.
- The grand issue is between the monetary state of today and the de-monetized state of tomorrow, wherein man will assert exclusive money power under the principle that only producers may create money.
- Thereafter the politico-economic issues that now exist will be no more, for the state will have lost its power to inflect the economy either to the left or to the right.
- The aim is not to pose a political revolution but to induce a revolution in thinking of money and an evolutionary movement through local, non political, action to establish a private enterprise money system independent of the existing political money system.
PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MONEY
A Non-Political Money System
by E. C. Riegel
In the preface to the book, the author says this:
The life of modern man depends upon his mastery of money.
Our political money system is breaking down and must be displaced by one that serves the needs of modern exchange. Otherwise our civilization will perish.
As technological improvements tend to specialize and confine each man’s production, the need for the exchange of products increases, and, therefore, man’s dependence upon money makes the mastery of this vital agency more and more imperative.
Production grows more mechanical, while consumption, on the other hand, has no machine technique; it still operates by our hands and bodies. Therefore there can never be mass consumption to coordinate with mass production. Consumption remains private and individual. Production grows more interdependent——requiring the coordination of many machines and many hands——while the function of consumption cannot be shared or mechanized; it is human, individual, self-dependent.
To fulfill the function of consumption (without which production is purposeless) the individual must be, as buyer, a self-starter and self-stimulator, and therefore, money power, sufficient to buy his production, must be at the command of every man. Otherwise the people cannot coordinate their consumption with their production and this deficiency causes the production machine to clog and recoil with vicious consequences. Not only are these economic results painful in themselves, but they cause the people to turn to political intervention as a remedy, and this complicates the problem and increases the peril.
WE MUST HAVE LESS RATHER THAN MORE POLITICAL INTERVENTION AND THIS BOOK WILL SHOW THAT IT IS POLITICAL INTERVENTION THROUGH THE MONEY SYSTEM THAT BREEDS ALL OUR ILLS. PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MUST, IF IT IS TO BE PRESERVED AND PERFECTED, HAVE A PRIVATE ENTERPRISE MONEY SYSTEM. THE POLITICAL MONEY SYSTEM IS INHERENTLY ANTIPATHIC TO PRIVATE ENTERPRISE AND INEVITABLY TENDS TO COMMUNIZATION.
Our mass production power must be balanced by our individual buying power and our buying power is dependent upon our individual money-creating power. Money cannot meet modern needs by descending to the people; it must rise from them. Until this is comprehended mass production must continue to miscarry. We, as consumers, must literally make money or be stymied. Government cannot assume this responsibility for us. Every individual producer must exert the right and assume the duty of creating money, if there be need therefore, to buy the value of his own production. There cannot be full distribution of wealth without full distribution of money power. He who would make must also take——in ratio. Each of us must have the ability to create fountain pen money with our own hands. Machine production must be coordinated with handmade money.
Recurrent business slumps, mal-distribution, over-production, unemployment, panics and depressions are but the gentler reminders that our industrial life is in danger. In the end war presses a gun against our head with the demand——money or your life. Must our economic and political maladies be compounded into periodic cataclysms and our civilization be destroyed before we master money?
Typical of the stress laid by economists upon the need for sustained purchasing power is the following quotation from “The Dilemma of Thrift” written in 1926 by William Trufant Foster and Waddill Catchings:
“In fact, adequate, sustained consumer-demand would do more than any other means now within human control toward increasing wealth, abolishing poverty, maintaining employment, solving labor problems, increasing good will among men generally, and maintaining the peace of the world. No means of preventing war holds out such large immediate possibilities as this… It is, therefore, difficult to exaggerate the importance of finding a means of sustaining purchasing power. The next world war, if it does come, may well be the last war——at least the last war in which the present nations will have any interest, for it may well destroy civilization itself.”
Well, “the next world war” has come and is upon us, and whether or not it is leading to the destruction of civilization will not be determined by the outcome of the military phase of the war. The issue cannot be determined by military victory. Its cleavage is not the battle front. Both Axis and Allied Nations are committed to the system of government-created purchasing power, whether they be classed as fascist, communist or democratic. The broad question that will determine the fate of humanity is whether the evil practice of synthetic buying power by governments shall continue to the inevitable collapse of the social order or whether the producer of wealth will exert his natural buying power and thus avert disaster.
Without reservation I assert that the whole fate of society hinges upon the one question of whether it can at this critical juncture gain mastery through the mastery of money and thus coordinate purchasing power with producing power. The issue is——money or your life.
——E. C. Riegel
In the introduction, his first words are:
Man has two major problems. His first problem is: HOW TO PROSPER. His second problem is:
HOW TO GOVERN GOVERNMENT.
The solution of one is the solution of the other. It lies in the understanding and exercising of his inherent money power through a non-political money system.
Because man has not mastered the problem of achieving prosperity, he has turned to government for its solution. Thus he has complicated his problem, for government offers no solution to the problem of prosperity, while its intervention in this primary problem brings the additional problem of how to govern government. When government undertakes to solve man’s problem for him it undertakes the mastery of society and it cannot be both master and servant. Thus it has failed in both spheres. By intertwining the prosperity problem with the political problem man has snarled the threads and no solution of either is possible without separation.
EVILS OF THE PRESENT SYSTEM
The present money system has three basic evils:
It permits money to be issued privately, only by a limited number of persons and
corporations who have bank credit, and makes such credit subject to fee. Thus it establishes credit as a privilege rather than a right, and makes it an object of profit rather than a utility to further the production and distribution of wealth. It denies to producers generally the right to issue money, thus making it impossible to expand buying power to potential producing power. This results in defeating the mass production system.
It permits the government to issue unbacked money. The only way the government could
back its money issues would be to go into the production of goods and services; and this would compete with private business. Thus the problem offers the two horns of a dilemma, both of which lead to socialization. If it backs its money issues with goods and services (and there is no other way it can be backed), it executes a frontal attack on private enterprise. If it issues money without backing it (as it is doing), it executes a flank attack on private business through inflation——since to issue money without creating equivalent values is to inflate.
It permits ambitious or designing or fanatical men who are in control of government to
light the fires of war, threatening the lives and fortunes of untold millions. This terrible power lies solely in the political money system since armaments spring from money and money springs from government fiat, whereas it should spring only from the fiat of the people who would thus hold the veto power.
It is a fantastic book which leads the reader to a far better understanding of what freedom actually means (Americans belief in their “Land of the free” is just so naive as they keep swinging between their Democrats and Republicans, just as we do here in the UK with Labour and Conservative and just about every other nation does. Even in the autocratic countries, the money power is still exerted by the state and controlled by the global banking fraternity.
Until we break this, you can vote to your heart’s delight and, as you, your parents and your parents’ parents have seen, nothing changes. Well. it does, but never positively. It takes two parents to work to keep a family afloat today while the feminists THINK they have done themselves and the world population a favour. They actually have no idea what they have done and how they were manipulated into doing it.
Schenectady Gazette, 26th December 1933:
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, December 29th 1913
Now, I’ve blogged long and hard over years about this subject – Money and law. I’ve introduced you to MPE (Mathematically Perfected Economy) and have strived to explain, again and again, what money actually is AND what “the law” and “legal person” actually are.
People say to me “Well, if you’re so smart DO something!” However, NOTHING can be done without this knowledge being imparted to everyone and and a vast number of people “feeling” it so much that they are determined to act, together. However, the vast number of people just want an easy life. The irony is they complain that their lives aren’t easy and guess what? THIS is why!
Oy veh! Just keep paying your dues!
NB: The quotes of Thomas Jefferson are oftentimes used wrt money and banking – such as follows:
“I sincerely believe… that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity under the name of funding is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” ~Letter to John Taylor, 1816
But even Jefferson (and many today who keep talking about Gold and Silver and that money should be issued by the state tax free) either have gotten it wrong OR they have an agenda. Jefferson wanted the State to be in control rather than private bankers, however, as is clear and obvious from the foregoing, neither the state nor the banks – neither of whom are producers of any kind – should have the power of issue of money. We, the producers, have the only true right to do so.