Earthling

These BASTARDS are trying to kill you!

When you watch and listen to this video, you must consider every word carefully. What I mean by this is, by example, the following:

When you hear Charles say “The experts do suggest the earth could support 9 billion people but not (Charles says) if a vast proportion are consuming the earth’s natural resources at present western levels”, you must understand what he is actually saying. It appears quite clear on the face of it, but it isn’t. He is obfuscating, purposefully.

“Present western levels”: Yes, there is significantly greater wealth in the western nations, per capita, than anywhere else BUT that wealth and resource use is NOT evenly distributed. There are many in the west who are clinging on to a living by the skin of their teeth. What Charles is really saying/meaning is that there is a class (of which, he is one) that wishes to maintain their wealth and use of resources and, in fact, wish to grow their capability to use even more while owning more and more land (what do you think Bill Gates is doing, for example? Largest private landowner, now, in the USA). What do you think the UN Agenda 21 land grab is about and who it is for in the long run? What is “Eminent Domain” all about?

Eminent domain, land acquisition, compulsory purchase/acquisition, resumption, resumption/compulsory acquisition, or expropriation is the power of a state, provincial, or national government to take private property for public use.

But what happens to public roads, bridges, etc in the end? They get re-privatised but to those who have the wealth to buy up huge swathes of public land. It, then, is charged for if it is provided for use by the public at all. It is theft.

Anyhow, I digress.

Charles also speaks of the 100M new jobs which need to be created in the arab world, alone, over the next 10-15 years. You must take pause and ask yourself: Why does Charles have anything to say about the arab world and their ability to provide jobs (or not) for their people? The answer is this: Charles, the UN and the World Economic Forum have their acolytes in every country in the world. They are, in all seriousness, both a cult and a dangerous global mafia. Charles and crew aren’t just interested in the west maintaining itself as opposed to the East or global south, however. Don’t make the mistake of believing this is “White Supremacy” at work trying to protect the white race. It has nothing to do with that. It has nothing to do with race. It is CLASS. It is BLOOD. You must remember the British Royal family is all about lineage and blood. They care as much about a white british person as they do for a Chinese or a Nigerian or Arab.

The bottom line is: IF they allow any decent level of wealth and affluence to come to you and I, every person/family which achieves what they consider to be ‘Middle Class’ is a danger to their aspirations to remain top of the heap; achieve their goals to have a world which they own and which allows them to enjoy a planet unencumbered by the burden of having lower classes who are of no use or interest to them “plaguing” their beautiful earth.

They see themselves as ‘The Meek’.

“Blessed Are the Meek, for They Will Inherit the Earth” (Matthew 5:5)The third beatitude puzzles many people in the workplace, in part because they don’t understand what it means to be meek. Many assume the term means weak, tame, or deficient in courage. But the biblical understanding of meekness is power under control. In the Old Testament, Moses was described as the meekest man on earth (Numbers 12:3, KJV). Jesus described himself as “meek and lowly” (Matt. 11:28-29, KJV), which was consistent with his vigorous action in cleansing the temple (Matt. 21:12-13).Meekness is not weakness; it is power under control. As the writer of Proverbs says, “He who is slow to anger is better than the mighty, and he who rules his spirit, than he who captures a city” (Proverbs 16:32).

You must understand that they truly believe they are ‘the meek’ and do not get the wrong impression of what ‘meek’ means!

THESE BASTARDS WANT TO KILL YOU!
See video here: https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/BackgroundtoCovid:8?r=EM87ieGHUZGAPTtofAcYrfH4xxhtHDLs

There will be a Part 2 of this blogpost because, if I included everything I need to bring to your attention in one post, it would be enormous and I know people are put off from reading blogs which are too long.

“Covid 19” has done its job. That job was multifold:

  1. Attack the world’s growing middle class
  2. Dramatically reduce Carbon emissions in line with the agreed upon actions from COP21 “The Paris Agreement” in 2015.
  3. To achieve ‘2’, destroy many aspects of industry and life including Petrol/Diesel vehicle manufacturing; Air travel; Agriculture; consumption in every aspect of life.
  4. Remove a significant number of human beings who, within a greying demography as we have in the west, add nothing to economic growth while using resources and money (pensions for example) that the elite do not want to pay out.
  5. Reduce population overall which the “crisis” has achieved in multiple ways and which “Covid” and other, ostensibly related to “climate change” effects, will continue to do.

Do not make the mistake of overlooking this: Boris Johnson and other ‘leaders’ have referred to “Covid” with wartime rhetoric and they are right: It is a war. It replaces what we consider wars to be but it is a war. It is a war on you, I and our children and their existing (or future) offspring, whether you live in the UK, USA, China, Indonesia, Ghana, Argentina, Germany, Sudan, Australia or the rest of the world’s nations. This war. achieves the same ends/goals for these people without the bombs. All that was necessary was a “shock”!

https://karmaimpact.com/shock-to-citizens-may-be-needed-as-climate-change-fight-fails-deutsche-bank-says/

And that “shock” is going to ramp up come November 2021 at COP26 in Glasgow. You ain’t seen nothing yet!

https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/growing-consumerism_en

So, whether you are black, brown, white, arab, european, latin or inuit, do NOT make the mistake of thinking someone of the other group is your enemy. Every one of you have members of this ‘cult’ within your own borders acting against you.

This is not a race war. It is a CLASS WAR! They have no interest in “White Supremacy” or “BLM” or any other organisation or “ism” you may believe in. They USE it all against you/us. These labels are TOOLS of their ‘trade’ and for every one of you who swallows the propaganda, you’re also a useful tool to them. A tool against humanity and against yourself.

https://www.businessinsider.com/why-rich-people-think-theyre-better-than-everyone-scientific-explanation-2019-5?r=US&IR=T&fbclid=IwAR2hefiwumBQOzUsT628njXfw34CGgL5dg2vbLEPSXe0mUHmvN_2oH-Ud7A

The Brave New World of “Covid”

Posted in "Climate Change", Agenda 21, Covid 19, Science, Uncategorized, Vaccinations by earthling on August 7, 2021

As the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to kill thousands of Americans each week, bioethicist Parker Crutchfield has suggested a controversial approach to battling the pandemic — namely a “morality pill.” Specifically, he suggests that widespread administration of psychoactive drugs could provide “moral enhancement” that would make people more likely to adhere to social norms such as wearing masks and adhering to social distancing guidelines.

Crutchfield — an Associate Professor of Medical Ethics, Humanities and Law at Western Michigan University — acknowledges that the idea is “far out” and controversial. But he does note that well-known chemicals, such as oxytocin and psilocybin (the active ingredient in “magic mushrooms”) can lower aggression and increase empathy towards others, and thus potentially “boost” our “cooperative, pro-social behavior.”

Crutchfield is not the first ethicist or scientist to explore the concept of a “morality pill.” Peter Singer and Agata Sagan discussed this idea in the New York Times in 2012. Neurobiologist Molly Crockett has also written about this concept in The Guardian.

Although this idea may seem tempting to frustrated policymakers, there are a few important caveats to consider:

1) The science is still quite dubious.

As Crockett pointed out (and as Crutchfield acknowledges), the various drugs can have a variety of complex effects on behavior, “some good, some bad (and of course what counts as good or bad depends on whom you ask).” Furthermore, the effects can be quite subtle. These drugs may not induce strong effects in either personality or behavior.

2) The concept of a “morality pill” is pretty controversial amongst ethicists.

As Vanessa Rampton noted in Slate, ethicists of various camps don’t necessarily agree on what the right course of action is during difficult dilemmas. Furthermore, studies have shown that various proposed moral enhancement drugs can shift normal volunteers’ choices in hypothetical ethical “trolley problems” in either direction. What counts as the “right” direction depends on one’s school of ethics. What one ethicist might consider a morality “enhancer” another might deem a morality destroyer.

Rampton also notes: “Implicit in the idea is that some elite group — whether neuroscientists, corporate executives, or policymakers — would claim to know some moral truth and then issue rules for the unenlightened to follow.”

I dare say many Americans would be extremely hesitant to outsource their moral decision-making to scientists or politicians. (As an aside, this is one of the sub-themes of the science fiction movie, Serenity.)

3) Even if a “morality pill” were fully safe and effective, the ethics of any mandatory “morality pill” basically reduces to the already existing ethics over mandating people wear masks.

Crutchfield recognizes this issue, noting that those “who need moral enhancement are also the least likely to sign up for it.” He therefore explores involuntary methods, such as legally requiring people take the morality pill or administering the drug secretly via the water supply.

In other words, mandating people take a “morality pill” doesn’t alter the fundamental moral calculus of any proposed policy. It merely makes enforcing good (or bad) laws easier for the authorities.

For now, the concept of a “morality pill” remains firmly within the realm of science fiction, not science fact. Those who support wearing masks and social distancing to reduce the spread of Covid-19 will need to stick to old fashioned methods of discussion, debate, and rational persuasion to obtain the necessary “buy in” from the American public. These methods will take more work than slipping a chemical secretly into our water supply. And I’m totally ok with that.



Of course, being the consummate “Conspiracy Theorist” that I am, I made the entirety, of the foregoing, up. It was just a creation of my vivid imagination.

Or was it?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2020/08/30/could-a-morality-pill-help-stop-the-covid-19-pandemic/?sh=31e41bcb5b84

The Drugs don’t work

Posted in Uncategorized by earthling on August 1, 2021

“We understand. you’ve just passed your 65th birthday, Mr Smith?”

“Yes, but what has that got to do with my condition?”

“Oh nothing, but we’re sorry Mr Smith, there’s nothing more we can do. Since Covid 19 and the overuse of medicinal drugs, they no longer work and we can’t prescribe them for you.”

“Who says they don’t work?”

“The Doctors!”

“Who tells them?”

“The pharmaceutical companies!”

“How do you know what they’re saying is true?”

“Mr Smith! Do we need to send for the MCE?”

“What’s the MCE?”

“The Medical Council Enforcement officers, Mr Smith. Now please calm down, we’ll make your passing as pain free as possible!”

“But I can pay!”

“You can? How so Mr Smith? It doesn’t show on your records.”

“I am independently wealthy and don’t share this on my records.”

“Mr Smith, we live in a world based on a cashless society. How could you have hidden such wealth?”

“Just call Lord Rothschild. He’ll explain. Now, how much are the drugs ‘which don’t work’?”

“Ok, Mr Smith. It is important that you sign this non disclosure however……”

“Certainly! Just get me those drugs!”

“Amid the expanding Covid 19 pandemic..(AMR)..which may well be enhanced through improper use of antibiotics to treat patients with severe Covid-19 infection”.

Really? What about an alternative explanation which just could be that the Covid 19 vaccines (which are proving to be entirely ineffective at stopping people from acquiring ‘Covid 19’) are, themselves, causing the ‘hidden threat’ of AMR by compromising one’s immunity to infection and resistance to the drugs?

“the contribution of the Covid 19 pandemic on the escalation of AMR.” How convenient!

“Older persons in Europe and Latin America rely heavily on public transfers and fund more than two thirds of their consumption with those transfers.”

Ah! Sir Paul Nurse. A good buddy of Charles. Now where have I heard that name before?……

Ah yes!

“Sir Paul Nurse was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.”

“It’s a big club and you ain’t in it!” – George Carlin.

Matt Hancock and AMR

Posted in "Climate Change", Agenda 21, Covid 19, Science, Uncategorized by earthling on August 1, 2021

Ok, so we now have an article re Hancock and AMR in the Daily Mail from April this year.

However, being the ‘mad conspiracy theorist’ I am, I am proposing that this “AMR” is a created con every bit as much as ‘Covid 19’. I would go further to suggest that ‘Covid 19’ (at least, the vaccines being pushed, ostensibly to ‘fight it’) is for the purposes of sterilisation while also having the effect of killing people whose genome is already compromised with some non communicable disease (see the Lancet article in one of my previous blogposts over this week). In addition, however, I am of the belief there could be a link between the action of the vaccine and the compromising of the body’s immune system to everyday bugs. This, in turn, could allow the governments and their ‘esteemed scientists’ to suggest that people are dying of ailments, we used to be able to treat, because of “AMR”.

Is it really that difficult for so many people to see all of this Covid, Climate Change and, now, ‘AMR’ all coming together like a proverbial tsunami and not put 2 + 2 together and realise it is all planned? The planning is all there to be seen and read if they were to just apply themselves.

All the same people and organisations (Hancock, Gates, Prince Charles, the UN, the WHO. etc etc etc) are ALL making their statements and ‘moves’ to create. the same – what will become – hysteria surrounding the subject of AMR as they have done with Covid.

The journals and articles have been out there in circulation for years just as there were the same for “a new pandemic” and infectious disease and the securitisation moves to ensure emergency measures could be taken and anyone thinking of questioning the reality could be shut down. It’s all there. All the same Modus Operandi.

Now, with “Covid 19” there were articles and events and statements etc beforehand but nobody had guessed, beforehand, that they were going to introduce a pandemic in 2020. Yes the signs were there but not in the public domain and not referencing, precisely, something called “Covid 19”. So the coverage of “Covid 19” now is all hindsight while we try to uncover the deception of it. The deception is very clear as to what it is all about but, still, the vast majority of people simply don’t buy it.

My intention in bringing the AMR issue to your attention is that we may then get it out BEFORE it becomes fully public (yes it’s ‘public’ by way of this Daily Mail article but has the full gravity of it been taken in? I’d say no).

Again, this AMR narrative has been worked on over the past decade alongside the infectious disease/pandemic narrative and I want people to recognise this before they are. faced with the ‘big announcement’ of it sometime down the line. It will, of course, be connected to Climate Change as has Covid but the idea of it is very simple:

“Due to Climate change (a con), we’ve had a pandemic and every step we have taken in battling this pandemic just so happens to have been focused on steps we have wished to take toward eradicating ‘climate change’. The increase in global average temperatures is causing an increase in disease and creating superbugs with our inability to fight them because of AMR. This means many people are going to die of disease we used to be able to deal with. It just so happens that ‘climate change’ is due to increasing consumption of the world’s resources and that increased consumption is due to ever increasing population (which we don’t like) but we wish to save the lives of those who are going to die of pandemics and AMR (even though it adds to the population numbers which we don’t want). So, while we want population reduction, we want to stop people from dying due to the effect they are creating which is caused by the increased population but please don’t listen to those ‘conspiracy theorists’ who point to this dichotomy and ask you whether you believe us when we say we are trying to save you.”

“MODERN MEDICINE MAY CEASE TO EXIST” except for those who can afford it while we get rid of those of you who are excess to requirements.

People had better wake up to this and quick otherwise there is going to be one hell of a reduction in the world’s population over the course of the next 30 years itself, nevermind 50 to 100 years! You MUST ask yourself this question: HOW DOES PRINCE CHARLES COME UP WITH A FORECAST OF JUST 2 BILLION PEOPLE ON THE PLANET WITHIN THE NEXT CENTURY?

“It’s an existential threat as great as climate change”. Here is the FACT: “Climate Change” is NOT and never was an “existential threat” but was created as such through “Speech Acts” (see Copenhagen School Securitization) to further bolster the argument that there are too many people on the planet which, itself, is a lie but “Population” was also securitized. The entire reason for all of this being that “The meek shall inherit the earth” and these people see themselves as ‘the meek’.

Until the world’s population understand this (or at least a good fraction of it), they win. If you refuse to understand or believe it, you are sending your genetics (i.e. your offspring will die out) to an early grave sooner or later. Then again, this may not concern you. However, even if it doesn’t, your own life is still going to be a bloody misery because this agenda is going to oppress your freedoms so badly.

Oh the words. are so positive aren’t they? But then they always are on every subject known to man when uttered by a politician wishing to ‘sell’ you something.

Beware. Be very aware. You are being deceived.