Earthlinggb's Blog

NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD

Posted in Media, Money, Paedophilia, Politics, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on August 10, 2019

A “Dead Man’s Switch” is a backup plan in case of untimely death or incapacitation, used as a threat to protect the holder. If that person dies or fails to issue some form of communication within a set period of time, the plan goes into action automatically, making it in the interests of the threatening party to not harm that person. Provided, of course, that the threatening party knows about it.

In 2004, American librarians recoiled at the FBI’s demands to rummage through their patrons’ reading habits and use them to infer terroristic intent, and at the FBI’s gag orders preventing librarians from telling their patrons when the police had come snooping.

Jessamyn West, a radical librarian, conceived of a brilliant solution, a sign on the wall of her library reading “THE FBI HAS NOT BEEN HERE (watch very closely for the removal of this sign).” After all, she reasoned, if the law prohibited her from telling people that the FBI had been in, that wasn’t the same as her not not telling people the FBI hadn’t been in, right?

NOW, IF YOU THINK FOR ONE MOMENT, THAT JEFFREY EPSTEIN DID NOT HAVE HIS “DEAD MAN’S SWITCH” WHICH WOULD EXPOSE – IN DETAIL – EVERY LAST PAEDOPHILE HE KNEW OF (INCLUDING ANDREW) TO ENSURE HE REMAINED ALIVE, YOU ARE EXTREMELY NAIVE!

One thing about Stefan Molyneux: He’s a sucker for Mainstream news!

 

 

They’re not called “The synagogue of Satan” for nothing you know!

 

 

 

How absolutely bloody peculiar Leon! (and convenient)

Posted in Paedophilia, Political History by earthling on January 22, 2015

When has anyone ever said they had a “convenient cancer”.

You COULD say 10CC: Number 10’s convenient cancer.

How peculiar! 😉

So now, await the media having their obligatory feast and a field day while they now have the guts to probe deeply into Leon as he probably probed deeply himself in one or two ways!

Leon dies

But hey, Savile’s dead so all that paedophilia and necrophilia just doesn’t exist anymore and, now that Brittan is dead, don’t worry, all that other parliamentary paedophilia happened in the 1980’s. It was just a fad we were going through. It doesn’t happen today for goodness sakes! You must be a Conspiracy theorist to think that!

Leon cover up

 

Good riddance to a dirty bastard! Death takes them all but others follow in their footsteps unfortunately. But Britain doesn’t really wish to know about Brittan and if the media and the government tell you it’s racist to speak of jews being creepy bastards but it’s entirely ok to speak of muslims all being terrorists, then those same government and media can have you believe in anything (and they do).

God bless the Queen!

Tagged with: ,

‘Uncle’ Joe just Biden his time…

Posted in Paedophilia, Uncategorized by earthling on January 17, 2015

Just to say, I’ve seen other similar kind of posts and videos showing what the uploader suggests is questionable and, generally, I think “ok, we’re stretching a bit here” but this lot just creeped me out.

I think he’s gone just a little (or a lot) too far in his “friendly, touchy feely” way. If they were MY kids I’d have them stand well away from him but then, even if requested, I wouldn’t be in that guy’s company anyhow. I question the families as much as I question him. To want to be in the presence of that guy and part of that “gang”, in my mind, you’d probably let him (if you know what I mean?).

It’s under “paedophilia” by the way because it seems “paedophilia” is “just a love for children” (really? then I must be one right?) and Biden does state outright that he likes children more than people. Interesting that since I have always worked under the assumption that children ARE “people”, “PERSONS”. Hmmm 😉

Tagged with: , ,

HOTEL PAEDOPHILIA

Posted in Uncategorized by earthling on January 4, 2015

The “Alternative” Paedophile

Posted in Media, Paedophilia, Politics by earthling on July 6, 2014

Paedophiles in government. Paedophiles in the monarchy. Paedophiles in the media and now, Paedophiles in the ALTERNATIVE media!

I wonder who those could be? I wonder if Davey and Sean (the big mouths of TPV, the guys who keep their spending of the money they raised from you close to their chests, the guys who sell you bullshit while they literally talk a globalist talk, have the hetero haters on the shows and the ex women MPs who have something to hide too) know who the alternative media paedos are? What do you think? After all, Davey knows it all doesn’t he? He knew about Saville (but didn’t say a word before it became public knowledge and then pretended he had said something. Even his ex colleague ran a story – yes Ms Poulton – saying Davey knew about Saville before it came out in mainstream when, in fact, he had never mentioned it at all beforehand but he likes you to think he did).

There is diseased shit under every rock folks so be careful who you consider to be on “your side”.

I have so much more to say about this paedophile eruption. Not exposing any, just commentary. But, right now, I just don’t have the “bandwidth”. I’ll get around to it though.

For now, here’s Bill Maloney – a brave guy I only met fleetingly once but his head was elsewhere I guess at the time. By the way Bill, if you stumble over this: The Bradbury Pound is the entirely wrong answer (sorry to those who believe otherwise).

One of the best things people could do (but won’t) is for them to drop their belief system in “heroes” – either those in uniform or those on the TV and in positions of (seeming) power.

But they won’t and you know why? This is why:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01zxmrv/the-men-who-made-us-spend-episode-1 (How long this will be on BBC iPlayer I don’t know but it’s the mentality – the “zombies”, those who are so easily led – which maintains the “heroes”. However, as you will see, we’re making “heroes” out of boxes too. The majority of humanity is dumb to the bone and so easy for the elite to manipulate that it’s not the elite – as perverted, sociopathic and psychopathic as they are – who are the problem, it’s the “zombies”. They are who scare the pants off me.)

And if you decide to watch the above and find it at all interesting, you may find the deeper probe into planned obsolescence even more interesting:

We’ll “buy” anything that’s “sold” to us as “Just what you need to be sexy!”

Meanwhile, back to paedophilia. There were once “perverts” and “poofs” – guys who liked to give other guys guy fluid up their ass or to swallow (let’s just call a spade a spade shall we? Or is the reality of it meant to be politically ‘correctified’ and brushed under the carpet like the time they themselves were “in the closet”? But they were given a name: “homosexuals”. Homosexuality was the mane of their “thing” rather than heterosexuality. But you see, having been given a name, the next step (over time) was to ‘normalise’ it and so those who considered it abnormal were then given a name: Homophobes and political correctness (arbitrary policy decided upon by the government(s) which you all know are corrupt – except, as in this case, when you THINK they’re doing the “right thing” under pressure from society (when in fact the elite steer what they want you to accept, you idiot)) put the negative focus on those who disagreed with the normalisation of it.

And it’s all done by ‘grassroots’ pressure groups and academics.

What we now have is the next step in human “enlightenment” which is slowly, delicately (and it will take years/decades just as it did for the homos BUT it will come and all you ‘liberal’ parents out there will have nothing to say and no comeback when your sons and daughters are being fucked (yes let’s call a spade a spade again) by old men and women whose paedophilia has been “normalised”.

Well done Mr and Mrs “Liberal” for being so liberal! 😉 But then perhaps it’s you who want to fuck kids right? But soon any criticism of you will be considered “paedophobic” or “hebephobe”.

 

Paedo natural

 

Why just males? Women are into it too! But that doesn’t fit the media narrative. It’s another attack on men.

All I’ll say to this piece is: BULLSHIT! You have to be one sick mother****** to want to have intercourse with a child!

But no, the academics and the media are working their “magic” again to slowly creep towards the acceptance and normalisation of the paedophile. Lock up your sons and daughters Mr and Mrs conservative because the liberals and the perverts are coming for them. But don’t speak out too loudly because you’ll be labeled and termed a “phobe” and, even worse, an “extremist”. Do you have christian values in this JUDEO-christian country of ours? Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You’re on a list! The tables have flipped and the once oppressed (although they brought it upon themselves for the sake of a sliver of land in the middle east) are now the oppressors and you, Mr and Mrs Christian will soon wear the yellow badge! It won’t be a star however, it will be a cross!

Gay TV

Posted in Media by earthling on March 29, 2014

Now it becomes all so clear.

On the stroke of midnight last night, a little gay guy (I was not sure he was until now) made sure that, being in the media himself, he gets press for being one of the first gay “husbands” in the UK. And the media always make sure to cover their own and give them that much needed publicity which, in this case, Sean Tabatabai’s “marriage” certainly was.

Now all the tweets and the TPV predilection toward homosexuality and porn and, of course, their love affair with Peter Tatchell and transvestites etc all make the sense I had already sensed but could point to nothing specific which held it all together.

The “Guardian on the gates of the ethos” indeed.

Homosexuality, in a political sense, is a globalist movement and is being used to destroy the family. If you call yourself “awake” and you don’t understand something as well documented and easily understood as this, then please, don’t talk to me about your “awakened state”. You’re an ignorant twat. (Another few hundred readers have gone “poof”!)

They need to destroy the family to get at the children (physically with paedophilia and mentally with the NWO dogma being taught to them and their believing the state is their family). So all you “progressive” heterosexuals out there with children who are so “it’s the 21st century man” are fucking idiots! – just sayin’. Just like your acceptance and acquiescence all these years to the brainwashing of “political correctness” which now has you shitting yourself to speak your mind and, therefore, controlled. It has been that very same political correctness which has heralded in the gay state, the human rights of paedophiles and murderers and terrorists. And there you sit, complaining of it all and complaining about the paedophilia, the porn, etc. All of it brought about by your acquiescence to politically correct homosexuality. Do you flaunt your heterosexuality in parades up and down the country? But you’ve allowed theirs for decades and more and more, blatant sexuality has been spread over your screens and your kids have seen it while more and more of you – hetero or homo – as parents of children, have splashed your scantily clad bodies with your tattoos and your words on your profiles, across social media sites and online dating sites.

Every single one of you who has, has brought this society to what it is now as you sit and complain about your lot in life. You fucking deserve it!

Tabatabai

But now this makes sense:

Another nice little tweet from the "enlightened" Sean Tabatabai

Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai

The words of an "enlightened" man. Rather misogynist but I'm sure Icke's female fans will forgive him. After all, it's only a joke right? Fish and slags. :-)

The words of an “enlightened” man. Rather misogynist but I’m sure Icke’s female fans will forgive him. After all, it’s only a joke right? Fish and slags. 🙂

Then again, perhaps there's a reason for those descriptive words toward females? :-)

Then again, perhaps there’s a reason for those descriptive words toward females? 🙂

So all you “ladies” who are so tuned in to this “The People’s Voice” in the belief it’s all about love and respect and truth, you keep believing while the guy (can you call him a guy?) who runs it along with his bum-chum, Icke, considers you slags and smelling like fish because you’re women.

You keep believing honey!

While Icke’s son already gave the game away about the plan – from day one – to be on satellite and voila! 6 months later, they’re coming to you all for your money once more to make it happen (but no, they never intended to get an OFCOM licence oh no! You thick TWAT!):

Gareth Icke SKY

Now how did the young Icke know that “not originally but eventually”? In October last year!

How dumb a fuck do you wish to be taken for?

And they’ll launch. Your money or not, they’ll do it and you know why? Because I have said from the beginning, there are backers/funders behind this little bunch of sharks.

YOUR money is just being used for “slush funds”.

Meanwhile, I have to ask the question – although I have my own opinion: Is David Icke bisexual? Because you meet him in person, there’s a lot going on behind those eyes. Those eyes hide something very very deep.

Sean Pagan

The disease within.

Posted in Paedophilia by earthling on February 25, 2014

From the annals (or was it anals?) of Lord Fingerboy of Fuckinghamshire……

voice_clarke

1965

My Lords, we must protect the Crown and the good name of this Parliament! At present, we have a law against homosexuality and my noble Lord Boothby is, himself a homosexual. We know, among us, there are many more and what is imperative is for us to come to agreement, once more, and legislate for homosexuality so as to ensure none of our noble Lords, Members of Parliament, Judges and others within our establishment, find themselves open to coercion, bribery and blackmail. That would not do my Lords! The public must be assured that their parliamentary representatives act within the law otherwise all is lost. To ensure this, we must legalise our perversions! All say Yay! {{{{{YAY!}}}}}

LORD BOOTHBYAs I see it, the main object of this Bill is to avoid blackmail. We know that there are more cases of blackmail in connection with homosexuality than anything else in this country. I suggest to your Lordships that if this Amendment is passed, the main object of the Bill will be destroyed. We are out to avoid blackmail. I have consulted a number of eminent solicitors in the course of the last three months, some of the most eminent solicitors of all. They have said this to me and I think it is a point, “If anyone who occupies a position of public responsibility, or is in a position of public notoriety, came to us and said he was being blackmailed, rightly or wrongly, with reason or with no reason, for homosexuality, we should very much hesitate to advise him to fight the case. On balance, we should advise him to pay. But if it were Mr. John, or Mr. Smith, or Mr. Jenkins, of Wolverhampton, or Leicester, or perhaps even Edinburgh, someone who was of no importance at all, he would pay his fine of £.10, and that would be the end of the matter, and there would be no headlines in the newspapers at all”.

I sincerely believe that this is absolutely wrong. Any young man in this country is in a position to blackmail a man who is in a position of responsibility, or who is a well-known figure in this country. I have been advised—I assure the noble Earl, and I am sure he would agree with me; I cannot mention names but they are the very best solicitors—that in these cases the probability is that they would say, “Pay, and finish with it, because we can give no guarantee whatever of any safety or security”. That is what I want to avoid in this Bill above anything else.

§LORD CHORLEYIt seems to me that the two noble and learned Lords who are supporting this Amendment so strongly are so emotionally involved in this problem that they have lost the sense of proportion that lawyers ought to bring to bear on matters of this kind. The idea that something ceases to become consent because there is a gift attached to it is completely new in the whole domain of English law. It is a most astonishing proposition. They go on to say that men of over 21 years of 396age are no longer to be free agents. They are to be curbed in this sort of way by the law. When they look back on this debate in a few weeks’ time I think they will be puzzled to know how they could be led to such an emotional situation. It has never been suggested in the whole of history that men over 21 should not be free agents in respect of what they decide to do and that they should be curbed in this way. On the face of it, it is a proposition that I should have thought would not hold water for a minute.

§LORD CONESFORDI have heard more astonishing law from the last two speakers than I have heard during the rest of my legal life. It would seem that the noble Lord, Lord Chorley, is under the impression that bribery is no offence.

§LORD CHORLEYIs the noble Lord suggesting that this is a case of bribery? It is not within a mile of bribery.

§LORD BOOTHBYBlackmail.

§LORD CONESFORDThe noble Lord, Lord Boothby, flits from pillar to post with such rapidity, reversing what he said in his last speech with every new speech he makes, that it is difficult to keep up with him. The noble Lord, Lord Boothby, said that an eminent solicitor, wisely nameless—

§LORD BOOTHBYMore than one.

§LORD CONESFORDMore than one solicitor advised a person who was being blackmailed to pay up. I can only say that the most eminent practitioner in the law at the time I first began to practise told me that from time to time he had been consulted by people who were being blackmailed. He had always given the same advice—pay nothing and tell them to be damned. He said, “I know that my advice was right, but it was seldom taken”.

I am in complete sympathy with the noble and learned Lord the Lord Chancellor and, so far as I understand him, with the noble Lord, Lord Boothby, in loathing blackmail. What astonishes me in this whole controversy is the quite extraordinary view that, if we pass this Bill or something like it, the blackmailing of homosexuals will cease. Why on earth should it? The noble Lord, Lord Boothby, said, quite rightly, that to a 397public man a reputation of being homosexual could be very harmful. Therefore, the revelation that he is a homosexual—

§LORD BOOTHBYI really must protest against that. I never said that I was a homosexual—”The revelation that I was a homosexual”.

§LORD CONESFORDI said nothing of the kind. The noble Lord is not always the person concerned if he is concerned at all. I shall perhaps be saying something of what the noble Lord, Lord Boothby, did earlier in this debate, about which I had intended letting him off.

§LORD BOOTHBYBe careful.

§LORD CONESFORDI will be careful. If it is damaging to a public man to be known to be a homosexual, whether it is a criminal offence or not, the blackmailer can make a threat of revealing the fact, and that threat may be so severe that it may be worth buying off with money. Therefore, it is untrue to say that the mere passing of a Bill of this kind will end the risk of blackmail in connection with homosexual offences.

I share what I am sure is the hope of the Lord Chancellor, that if there is a reform of the law, blackmail will diminish; but I do not put it higher than that. Can we not get some of the advantages of a reform of the law without opening the door to something that everybody in the House, whatever his views on this problem, would think horrible—namely, a rich man using his wealth, not to buy affection, but to buy the commission of what has hitherto been a serious criminal act? That, as it seems to me, is a real risk. It is against that that my noble and learned friend Lord Dilhorne has devised this Amendment. It may he imperfect; there may be objections to it; but I am sure it deserves more respect than it has hitherto received.

Since I promised that I would deal with the noble Lord who has so consistently interrupted everybody who has been making a speech on this subject throughout this afternoon, let me come to the noble Lord, Lord Boothby. At an earlier stage in the proceedings, on the very first Amendment to-day, the noble and learned Lord—

§LORD BOOTHBYI am not learned.

398

§LORD CONESFORDNo; but Lord Dilhorne is. My noble and learned friend Lord Dilhorne said that in earlier proceedings Lord Boothby had misrepresented to the House the nature of this Bill and the nature of the Report of the Wolfenden Committee. This was indignantly denied by Lord Boothby.

§LORD BOOTHBYHear, hear!

§LORD CONESFORDVery well. Then I would recommend Lord Boothby to acquire a copy of the Hansard of May 12 of this year, and to turn to column 131. He will there find that he interrupted my noble friend Lord Rowallan with these words: All we are talking about is the Labouchere Amendment, and that is all that the Wolfenden Committee wants to be removed.”—[OFFICIAL REPORT, Vol. 266 (No. 73).] Lord Rowallan said: I am afraid that I cannot accept such a statement. Then Lord Jessel said this: My Lords, if the noble Lord, Lord Boothby, had been here a little earlier, he would have heard from my noble friend Lord Dundee a very full description of what happened. Then I intervened for, until this evening, the only time I have intervened on this topic, as follows: My Lords, I am not taking any side in this intervention, except to say that the noble Lord, Lord Boothby, is entirely wrong in saying that all we are discussing is the Labouchere Amendment, or that that was the sole subject of the Wolfenden Report.

§“LORD BOOTHBYOf course it was.

§“LORD CONESFORDOf course it was not.”

At that point the noble Earl the Leader of the House very properly intervened with the suggestion that Lord Rowallan might get on with his speech. I hope that the quotation I have made from the previous intervention of the noble Lord, Lord Boothby, will show how utterly wrong he was in suggesting that my noble and learned friend Lord Dilhorne had misrepresented him in any way in the speech that he made, and I hope that possibly what I am saying now may induce him to—

§LORD BOOTHBYKeep his trap shut.

§LORD CONESFORD—to remain in a sedentary position until he has something worth while to say.

2014

My Lords, I am now 49 years older as I stand here before you once again, but we must protect the Crown and the good name of this Parliament! At present, we have a law against paedophilia and a few of my noble Lords, Ladies and among those in the other place, we know as we did in the 1960s regarding the homos, are pedophiles.. We know, among us, there are many more and what is imperative is for us to come to agreement, once more, and legislate for paedophilia so as to ensure none of our noble Lords, Members of Parliament, Judges and others within our establishment, find themselves open to coercion, bribery and blackmail. That would not do my Lords! The public must be assured that their parliamentary representatives act within the law otherwise all is lost. To ensure this, we must legalise our perversions once more! All say Yay! {{{{{YAY!}}}}}

However, as was done in the sixties and seventies, we must lay the groundwork for the population to come to terms with such activity. We must use every weapon at our disposal – from media to human rights pressure groups – to impress the legality, morality and normality of such acts. We must ensure that the public recognises such as simply another sexual orientation.

2050

Holy shit! The Prime Minister has just fcuked a donkey! My Lords, I am now 110 and I sit here before you with my colostomy bag but I still believe in our greater good. We must protect the good name of this Parliament even though just an inconsequential satellite of the World Zionist government on Temple Mount. At present we have a law against bestiality and a few of my noble Lords……… actually, you know what? I’m done with you fcuking perverts!

But our good old boy, Icke, can see totalitarian tiptoe’s and connections everywhere but he can’t see it in this? I guess it doesn’t fit his agenda! 😉

“Hush it up, get rid of it, protect the Crown, the Parliament and our entire way of life from the public otherwise they may want to lynch the whole lot of us!”

You’re damned right we do!

Mirror paedo judge

“Mere concepts of morality have no business being law”

Posted in Gross stupidity within society, Law, Paedophilia by earthling on February 16, 2014

Yes you read that right. From ZETA – a group of what I guess we have to call humans who like to fuck animals.

So, by the same token, the mere concept of morality regarding sexually abusing a child or even murder have no business being law. If this is the way you want your world to go and this is the world you want your children and grandchildren to live in, then just keep liberally accepting the “progressive” laissez faire and “live and let live” and “Do what thou wilt” culture of depravity that just keep creeping along while our governments don’t listen to the moral concerns of most people but give way to the well funded minority groups who lobby. When did you ever hear of a group of lobbyists for “normality”? Never.

First homosexuality

then bisexuality

then omnisexuality (anything goes)

paedophilia

One thing though: When did you ever hear of a donkey speaking a language and, therefore, giving consent? Or do the zoophiliacs suggest that “Eee haw” is chinese for “Yes please”? ‘Mere concepts of morality have no business being law,’ said ZETA chairman Michael Kiok. Just state it is a “lifestyle choice” and demand your “human rights” to make such a choice and hey presto! You get a licence to shag a sheep! But people like Dharmabro (an ex commenter on here) can’t really say anything against it (thereby supporting it) because, as he says “homosexuality is natural and exists in the natural world”. Yes Dharmabro it does. Just as cross species sexual activity does, therefore, that MUST be ok too. You can’t argue with that otherwise your entire reasoning for homosexuality being “natural” is damned – which, by the way, it is. So what we have here is the homosexual community, simply by their own reasoning, support bestiality. It might not be their preference BUT, if they speak out against it, they are hypocrites and, not only that, they are zoo-o-phobes! Now you don’t want to be labeled a “‘phobe” of any type now do you homos? So what’s your way out? I can’t HEAR you! Bestiality http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html What I find strange with this comment re “his once friendly flock of sheep were beginning to shy away from human contact” is that do the new batch of sheep never see the older batch being taken away by humans and slaughtered? Doesn’t it even occur to them? Stupid sheep! But then who are we humans to talk? We ignore the shearing of ourselves by the governmental and banking shepherds. BAAAHH!

“Mere concepts of morality have no business being law”

And there lies the entire problem because, in fact, as has been stated by the lawmakers themselves on many occasions, morality does not enter into it. In fact, lawyers I have personally been up against stated such in their reply saying they believed my argument to be a moral rather than legal one. It was both but, nevertheless, they had the audacity to state it.

Coronation Street paedophilia: “Wild Bill” CockRoache!

Posted in Paedophilia by earthling on February 6, 2014

Subtle programming and subliminal advertising from our loveys at the “Street” once again…..

But I still know of a few people who will either just ignore it or make an excuse. Dear friends, brands and products pay big money to have their product advertised subtly in TV shows and movies. This DVD is NOT there by accident. It has been placed there very purposefully.

I wonder if Ken bought a copy?

1544480_669921853068737_1588803564_n

Now let’s consider the number of alleged pedophiles we have had from Coronation street so far. And is it just the tip of the iceberg? Well, we know Jimmy Savile was just a tip, we know there are quite a few in government circles (QUITE a few) and we have 4 known alleged paedos from Corrie:

Corrie paedos

Now who, precisely is “Kinsey”? Well Alfred Kinsey just so happens to have been a sexuality behavioural scientist – pretty much a pervert then to all intents and purposes. However, it went further than that while the Kinsey Institute are never going to admit it are they?

His projects gained funding from the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Research Council in 1942 so established the Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at Indiana. He conducted interviews from 5,300 males and 5,940 females on which he based his groundbreaking works.

The research work of Alfred Kinsey almost ended after the release of “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female”. He had allegedly offended thousands of Americans and the U.S. congress exerted pressure on Dean Rusk, the incharge of the Rockefeller Foundation, to unilaterally terminate the financial support of the institute.

After failing to raise funding from other means, Kinsey unfortunately gave up his extraordinary efforts that revolutionized sexuality research. The institute, however, survived and is still functioning as an independent organization under Indiana University.

Alfred Kinsey died on August 25, 1956 of a heart ailment and pneumonia. He was 62 years old.

Now, let’s look at the paedophilia:

A Yorkshire Television Production for Channel 4.

So what’s the Kinsey Institute’s mission today?

Kinsey Institute

The Kinsey Institute today is soft soaping (sorry couldn’t resist the “soap” terminology there) the entire issue on their website and it is highly likely that many of those interested in the Institute today will never have even heard about the Yorkshire TV production. I question whether they’d even want to know or care?

From the Kinsey Institute website regarding the “allegations”:

Allegations about Childhood data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

Allegations about Childhood data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

Allegations against Alfred Kinsey and his research on children’s sexual responses, as reported in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, were first made in 1981 by Dr. Judith Reisman. She subsequently enlarged on these ideas in a book written jointly with Edward Eichel and published in 1990 (Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud). When The Kinsey Institute responded, Reisman filed suit in 1991 against The Kinsey Institute, then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, alleging defamation of character and slander. In September 1993, Reisman’s lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman’s case with prejudice (which means that Reisman is prohibited from refiling the suit).

Below is a reiteration of these accusations, recently reported, and the Institute’s response.

The act of encouraging pedophiles to rape innocent babies and toddlers in the names of “science” offends. The act of protecting them from prosecution offends. The act of falsifying research findings which, in turn, open the floodgates for the sexual abuse of children, offends. (from Dr. Laura’s (Schlesinger) website)

This would be a cause of great concern if it were true. Kinsey was not a pedophile in any shape or form. He did not carry out experiments on children; he did not hire, collaborate, or persuade people to carry out experiments on children. He did not falsify research findings and there is absolutely no evidence that his research “opened flood gates for the sexual abuse of children.” Kinsey did talk to thousands of people about their sex lives, and some of the behaviors that they disclosed, including abuse of children, were illegal. In fact, many sexual behaviors, even those between married adults, were illegal in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Without confidentiality, it would have been impossible to investigate the very private lives of Americans then, and even now.

Where did Kinsey’s information about children’s sexual responses come from?

Kinsey clearly stated in his male volume the sources of information about children’s sexual responses. The bulk of this information was obtained from adults recalling their own childhoods. Some was from parents who had observed their children, some from teachers who had observed children interacting or behaving sexually, and Kinsey stated that there were nine men who he had interviewed who had sexual experiences with children who had told him about how the children had responded and reacted. We believe that one of those men was the source of the data listed in the book.

In a British documentary, a woman says she was sexually abused by her father and grandfather, and that her father justified it as doing research for Alfred Kinsey by filling out questionnaires. 

We have no reason to doubt that this woman was sexually abused. However, Kinsey did not ask people to fill out questionnaires. It is conceivable that this woman’s father or grandfather wrote to Kinsey, as many people have done. Following that documentary, we checked through Kinsey’s correspondence and could not find any that would match this story. We do know that there have been people who have used Kinsey’s name to justify what they do sexually, even recently.

Kinsey used a Nazi SS officer from Germany as one of his key contributors

In Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, Kinsey invited people to write to him about their sex lives. In 1955, a German wrote to him and told him about his sexual experiences with children. Kinsey, in his reply, was non-judgmental, as usual. He did however point out how strongly society condemned such behavior. Kinsey never made use of the information from this man. He also had no idea that this man had been a Nazi ten years earlier…. To suggest that Kinsey had something to do with Nazi torture of children is a bizarre fabrication.

Allegations and Controversy, 1995-1998

More Controversy about Childhood data
Soon after John Bancroft, M.D., assumed the directorship of The Kinsey Institute in 1995, he was called upon to respond to an allegation by the Family Research Council (FRC) about data on pre-adolescent orgasm that the late Dr. Alfred Kinsey had included 50 years ago in Chapter 5, “Early Sexual Growth and Activity,” of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (W.B. Saunders, 1948).

In the fall of 1995, Rep. Steve Stockman, Galveston, Texas, took up the FRC allegation, circulating a letter on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, in which he asked for support for a bill he had introduced to investigate Dr. Kinsey’s research. Stockman alleged that this data was derived from federally funded sexual molestation of children (the so-called “Children of Table 34”). Although Stockman’s staff were invited to put any questions to The Kinsey Institute and Indiana University, they declined. Stockman held a press conference December 7, 1995, calling for a congressional hearing. No hearing was held and the bill died. Stockman was defeated in the 1996 election.

In 1997, Concerned Women for America referred to this allegation in a press release with a renewed call for a Congressional investigation. In January 1998, Indiana State Representative Woody Burton submitted a House Concurrent Resolution to the Indiana General Assembly regarding Kinsey. In August 1998, a British television station produced a program based heavily on these allegations.

But then why would the UK or British governments wish to consider any action? After all, we have this:

wt

screen-shot-2012-09-20-at-2-28-00-pmobama_gay_scandal

ALL of it “alleged” you understand!

But lastly, don’t you get the feeling there’s more to this Kinsey Institute than just purely wholesome sex?

Of all things, they advertise erotic art with a cover photo showing the Goat of Mendes (Satan) about to spear a woman, from behind, with his obscured, erect weapon.

Kinsey 1

Not so subtle then!

David Icke: Jim’ll fix it!

Posted in Law, Media, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on January 9, 2014

Yeah I know, it’s nothing to do with Icke but when you realise just how many hits your website gets from a “David Icke” subject heading, you’d do the same.

I’m a “whore” aren’t I? 😉 lol

But I just take the piss out of anyone who’s full of shit – if that happens to be the world’s foremost “conspiracy theorist” and legend in his own bedroom, then so be it.

As for those who think they have something to say about me, carry on. Like the guy who likes to piss his money up the wall on a saturday night having been to a “Truth gathering” but then, the next day has to check the horse racing results before deciding if he can afford a breakfast for him and his missus! Hilarious bud. Just downright hilarious. But sad.

Anyhow enjoy the TV licence “ad”! 😉

Why do I do this? Because I can and it’s hilarious. You see, I don’t take this “truth movement” at all seriously. I started off doing so because what we’re up against is serious but when you recognise what a train wreck it all is and all this “love and light” stuff so many of you go on and on about and “twoof” when, as a whole, most can’t wipe their own arse, then you take that “Icke” step back and look again and seriously piss yourself at the incompetence of it all. The bastards we’re up against are whatever they may be and yes, to an extent, they may be incompetent BUT they know what they’re doing and they don’t have to be that competent to herd you all in whatever direction they choose. Icke’s a microcosm of that capability.

But here’s another thing, your “messiah” (god you’re all pathetic wimps) keeps sating “It’s the information that’s the star” and yet, that small few of you who hang to every word spat out by his conspiratorial majesty, attempt to attack (if you can call it that – it’s more like a limp penis trying to probe a vagina) the character of the people who lay information out on a plate for you. If it’s pointing at Icke then you completely ignore your messiah’s own words (and your adopted ideology off those words).

If Hitler came alive today and told you Tony Blair was a war criminal would you believe him?

I don’t give a flying **** what you think of me. If you’re competent enough to take information and process it then you are. If you’re not then you’re a lost, sad cause.

But one last thing: Icke names those who he knows have had an impact on him. Those have only had an impact, not because of who they are but because people are reading and understanding what they are saying. All they are doing is offering information (just like Icke) and all they are then saying is “make of it what you will” (just like Icke). What is “destroying” Icke is his own lack of transparency and his own (and those around him) incompetence.

I just add if you don’t or can’t see what is plainly before your eyes then you’re stupid. God do I get flack for that but hey, you are what you are. But, it is becoming very clear that many of you are not that stupid otherwise Icke and Tabatabai would be close to that £400K by now. It will be interesting if they make it and it will be interesting if they don’t. But listen David, if people were not willing or they were unable to process the information and see it for what it is, then neither me nor Sonia nor anyone else could have an effect on you. We’re just gatherers of information and we produce it (that’s what you do). It’s the people who are deciding what they make of that info and what they make of you. Don’t try to look for scapegoats for your own lack of transparency and incompetence David. You’re a “bigger” man than that aren’t you? Aren’t you?

Greetings from the awakened people of earth David.

David Icke & Jimmy Savile: It doesn’t add up!

Posted in Media, Paedophilia by earthling on December 10, 2013

Here is an article on David Icke’s website:

Icke savile 1

NOTE: ” But I have known about Savile since the 1990s…” AND “I knew that Savile supplied former Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath with young boys – I have been exposing Heath since 1998…”

Now listen to his interview on Liberty Tactics:

“I was first told that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile in 1997/98….”

So, get this: He writes about Heath in “The Biggest Secret” in 1998 but he makes NO mention of Savile which he admits he was told about at the very same time. Not only that but over the course of the next decade and the books he then wrote, he did NOT, in any one of them, mention Jimmy Savile. YET, he knew about Savile at the same time he knew about Heath? In his OWN words! So what’s the score David? IF you knew about Savile as you say you did, then why no mention of him in the books? You can’t use the excuse that Savile was alive because Heath was alive too.

I don’t give a flying dogfart about your mind challenged “protectors” who will make up ANY and ALL excuses for you. There is NO excuse.

Further, Lou Collins, like any other of the alternative media people who will interview Icke will not (and did not) question him on any of his assertions. Why? Is he the man that shall not be questioned? Question anyone and everyone else in mainstream and alternative but NEVER question this schmuck? Is he the “Godfather” of the alternative media or something? You ALL lick the bastard’s ass!

But this is a good time to include one last point. In an earlier blog of mine – before I had even heard of Sonia Poulton (which having now heard her I wish I hadn’t – my ears bleed for one thing) – I actually “thanked” her for covering a certain topic and here it is (taken from my blog re “Tony Blair, D notices, Princes, Popes, Politicians, “Pop pickers”, MI5, AND PAEDOPHILIA!”:

Dated October 28th 2012. So we can readily assume there was already significant contact between Icke and Poulton at this point (or is it just a synchronistic coincidence?).

Note: Poulton makes the following assertion on behalf of David Icke – “Savile’s BBC colleague David Icke, who went from respected broadcaster to laughing stock, was at the forefront of such claims in the Nineties when he named Savile and others as paedophiles.”

Ok Ms Poulton, NOW show us your journalistic integrity which, I have to assume, had you do due diligence on such an assertion and that you checked exactly when and through which media David Icke made these allegations regarding Savile at that time. Which book, press media or other broadcast media did Icke use for this and exactly when?

If you are unable to provide this then it proves two things: He never did claim such and YOU did not check your source(s).

Are YOU a repeater also Ms Poulton? A repeater of someone who then just so happened to become your paymaster less than a year later.

Or is this all just conspiracy theory on my part?

Whatever your answer, tell it to your faithful because it just doesn’t wash anywhere else.

So while that “paedophile infested establishment and its servile media sought to hold the line at Savile’s own abuse of young girls…” so, in fact, did David Icke because he did not expose Savile in ANY of his books from “The Biggest Secret” up until Savile’s exposure by the mainstream. WOW! Isn’t he ahead of the curve?

So unless PROOF to the contrary is forthcoming, we either take it that David Icke kept mum on Savile just as everyone else did OR David Icke knew nothing about it. His choice. I wonder which one he will make?

 

One final thing on Ms Poulton: If she has, as she claims, lists of pedophiles and, as she says, some may be alleged by people on the bandwagon but she seems to know there are some that are definites, then why is she not releasing the names? After all, TPV just had a mad barrister on the other day who did say something correct for once: If you are telling the truth and have facts on your side, releasing the names CANNOT be against the law. He then went on to say he couldn’t release names himself because the suspects were still alive – thereby, totally contradicting himself (as all of these so called “truthers” tend to do – even mainstream “real journalists” it would seem) but what do you expect from a pompous self serving, barrister who holds himself in such high esteem and believes the “gerries” are still out to get us?

Jesus Christ! This alternative media is a bigger joke than the mainstream!

The Prince, a “D.J” and a very “holy” Reverend!

Posted in Paedophilia by earthling on November 17, 2012

First there was Savile.

In the family, there was Louis Mountbatten, the “Greek’s” Uncle. The “Greek” meanwhile wants to eradicate half the world’s population (or more) by coming back as a virus once he dies (his words and they were not in jest) – The Nazis were eugenicists – our Royal Family and their friends – The Rothschilds etc – are the real Nazis and always were. Just read the history!

And Prince Andrew and his paedophilic friend.

NOW, we have Prince Charles giving refuge to a PAEDOPHILE PRIEST!

 

HOW MUCH WILL THIS COUNTRY’S POPULATION CHOOSE TO IGNORE? WHAT THE FUCK IS THE MATTER WITH PEOPLE?

 

Former bishop who is ‘loyal friend’ of Prince Charles arrested in Church of England child sex abuse investigation

 

Police investigating complaints of sexual abuse in the Church of England have arrested a former bishop and ”loyal friend” of Prince Charles.

The Right Reverend Peter Ball, a “loyal friend” of Prince Charles – has been arrested by Police investigating child abuse in the Church of England. A church which is headed by our Monarch!

The Rt Rev Peter Ball, 80, was detained at his home on suspicion of abusing eight boys and men ranging in age from 12 to their early twenties.

The alleged incidents are thought to have taken place during the late 1980s and early 1990s at addresses in East Sussex and elsewhere.

Ball, the former Bishop of Lewes and Gloucester, was arrested following a “comprehensive” three-month investigation into the Chichester Diocese.

The intelligence contained “reviews of church files relating to certain child safeguarding issues within the Chichester diocese from between 20 and 25 years ago”.

They also reviewed internal church files containing details of clergymen’s careers in the diocese, including Ball’s.

Detective Chief Inspector Carwyn Hughes of Sussex Police, who is in charge of the investigation, said; “We make it clear that the force will always take seriously any allegations of historic sexual offending, and every possible step will be taken to investigate whenever appropriate.

 

“Allegations of historic offences are treated just as seriously as any more recent offences.”

Ball, of Langport, Somerset, resigned as Bishop in 1993, only two years after he was appointed.

He quit after receiving a police caution for committing an act of gross indecency against a trainee teenage monk.

Shortly afterwards he was given sanctuary by the Prince of Wales who personally invited him to live in Manor Lodge, in the village of Aller, Somerset, a Duchy of Cornwall property.

 

St. Andrew’s church in Burgess Hill, Chichester, which is one of the churches in the Rt Rev Peter Ball’s diocese. There is no suggestion that St. Andrew’s is linked to the abuse (file picture)

But it is thought after living in the property for more than a decade he moved to another house in the same village last year.

Ball, who has previously described the Prince as “a loyal friend”, is thought to be the most senior member of the Church of England to be arrested after investigations started.

Speaking at the time he was given the house, Ball said: “He [The Prince of Wales] has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house.

“The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person.”

Sussex Police said another unnamed 67-year-old retired priest, was also detained at his home this morning near Haywards Heath, West Sussex, on suspicion of separate sex offences against two teenage boys in East Sussex between 1981 and 1983.

They added that: “There are no allegations of recent or current offending and police emphasise that there is nothing to suggest that any young people are currently at risk.

“Police also stress that the allegations are being treated separately and do not involve the two men allegedly acting together.”

A Sussex Police spokesman said Bishop Ball, and the unnamed man were currently in custody pending interview and further inquiries.

Tony Blair, D notices, Princes, Popes, Politicians, “Pop pickers”, MI5, AND PAEDOPHILIA!

Posted in Paedophilia by earthling on October 27, 2012

Search Hansard for statements relating to paedophilia in the Cabinet and provide “assurances”?

Cameron! Are you off your fricking nut as well as a criminal acting for the very bankers that want this stuff to happen? Cameron, you’re a dead man walking as are all the Lords and MPs in this establishment. This country will eventually come to the point of also decapitating the royal family.

But that is exactly playing into the hands of the bankers who want this to happen while you think they’re the people who are going to keep letting you play this game. Once you’re of no further use mate, they will hang draw and quarter you. Mark my words!

The following is JUST the Labour Party. You can be sure that just as many reside in the Conservative and LibDem ranks. Edward Heath was a paedophile yet that still hasn’t “come out” while Tom Watson suggests paedophilia reaches into the core of the British Government. Was it Thatcher’s aide? Or was it Tony’s? It doesn’t matter in a sense because this country is now waking up to the FACT that this country is a corrupt, steaming pile of shit with paedophilia lurking in every dark recess and corner of the street as well as in the dark corners of Whitehall. Westminster, the Houses of Lords and Parliament AND, what shall never come out (although it is obvious to those of us who have researched this in any depth and who are not in the slightest surprised by the facts now being brought to the country’s attention and to those of the population who would simply call us “mad conspiracy theorists”) is that this paedophilia stretches into the core of the British Monarchy.

It is not a “Big Society” we have in this country, it is a sick society!

The Labour Party’s Convicted Paedophile List.

1. Liam Temple Labour Councillor Inciting a child into ‘gross’ indecency
2. Stewart Brown Labour Party Lord Mayor Child Pornography
3. Sam Chaudry Labour Party Lord Mayor Elect & Labour Party Councillor Child Rapist
4. Nicholas Green Labour Party Lord Mayor Labour Party Councillor 13 rapes & assaults on Children
5. Keith Potts Labour Party Councillor Junior School Governor
6. Alan Prescott Labour Party Councillor Molesting Children in a ‘Care-Home ‘Where he worked
7. Terry Power Labour Party Councillor Sex attacks on boys
8. Joseph Shaw Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography
9. George Harding Labour Party Councillor Indecent assault on a child
10. Lee Benson Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography
11. Raymond Coates Labour Party Councillor Child rape
12. Les Sheppard Labour Party Councillor Sex attacks and rapes on Children
13. Martyn Locklin Labour Party Councillor Rape & Indecent assault on boys
14. Nelson Bland Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography
15. Greg Vincent Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography Films
16. Alec Dyer Atkins Labour Party Councillor Member of the ‘Shadows Brotherhood ‘Peadophile Ring. 42,000 images of Children being abused
17. Keith Rogers Labour Party Councillor 2,000 images of child pornography
18. Paul Diggert Labour Party Councillor Grooming children & child pornography
19. Peter Tuffley ( worked also for NSPCC & Barnardos ) Labour Party Personal assistant to Hazel Blears Caught in bed with a 13 year old boy
20. Mark Trotter Labour Party Member & Super Activist Child rapist with Aids
21. Yusef Azad Labour Party on the Greater London Assembly Computer seized in anti-Child Porn Operation
22. Gilbert Benn Labour Party Councillor Molesting a boy
23. David Spooner Labour Party Councillor Master…ed in front of Two little Children
24. Mark Tann Labour Party member & Activist Repeatedly raped Two girls under Eight years old.
25. Iestyn Tudor Davies Labour Party Councillor Repeatedly raped a Child

PLUS+

26. John Friary Labour Party Councillor Grooming a child on facebook
27. Steve Carnell Labour Party Councillor Downloading Child and Animal Porn
28. Toren Smith  Labour Party Councillor Found Guilty of 94.000 Images of Children Being Abused
29. Johnathan Phillips  Labour Party Councillor Downloaded Child Porn on His Memory Stick. It Was Found in The Town Hall After a Labour Party Meeting
30. Phillip Lyon Labour Party Aide to Tony Blair His House of Commons Office Was Searched And He Was Found Guilty of Child Pornography
31. Mark Burton Labour Party Councillor Sexual molestation of child. Trial continues..
32. Neil Redrup Labour Party Councillor Found Guilty of opening sexually explicit content in front of child.
33. Timothy Edmeads Labour Party super activist and events organiser to Labour Lord Mayor guilty of sex assaults on 3 children.
34. Adrian Cirket Labour Party councillor and GMB union official downloading hundreds of sickening images of child abuse in his family home where he lived with his wife and three children..35. Darren Geoffrey Pedley Labour party councilor and chairman of the board of governors at Sandbrook primary school found guilty of downloading and distributing child pornography…36. Labour Councillor for Leicester Manish Sood found guilty of Grooming School kids for sex…37. Evil Labour Party Councill  Candidate & Junior School  Governor Richard Harris  Found guilty of offering  Junior  school children £500 for sex.

.

38. Ex Deputy Labour Party Lord Mayor John Johnson was charged with downloading hundreds of images of child molestation. Some of the images depicted sadomasochistic rituals with children being tortured and raped by multiple adults.

.  Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell – Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.

.  Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys – Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on childre

.  Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor – Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and    was forced to resign.

.  Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington – Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.

.  Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy – Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.

.  Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan – Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.

.  Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who’s job includes running the Tory GLA website – Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.

.  Tory Party Councillor (Folkestone – in Leader, Michael Howard’s constituency), Robert Richdale – 41 year history of crime, involving 30 convictions and 5 prison sentences. Richdales enormous criminal record, which covers 10 pages of A4 paper, includes convictions for assault, theft, causing death by dangerous driving, forgery, drugs offences, possession of an offensive weapon, and sex attacks against underage schoolgirls. The Tory Party election campaign literature described Richdale as “a family man” who had a “compassionate personality”

.  Lib-Dem Council candidate (Tower Hamlets), Justin Sillman – Convicted and jailed for 2 years for sexual abuse of young boys.

.  Lib-Dem Councillor and Mayoral Candidate ( Sheffield ), Francis Butler- Prosecuted for indecent assault of a young boy.

.  Lib-Dem Councillor ( Stockport ) Neil Derbyshire – Sexually assaulted a 16-year old boy in a public toilet. He was caught with a plastic bag containing lubricant, plastic surgical gloves, a condom, and underpants.

.  Lib-Dem Councillor ( Preston ), Bill Chadwick – Charged with: Making an indecent photograph of a child, Incitement to rape, Incitement to murder, Incitement to kidnap, and Incitement to torture. Chadwick’s gay lover – Alan Valentine, is also a Lib-Dem councillor.

The Dunblane massacre:

Lord George Robertson (ex UK Defence Secretary 1997/98 and Sec Gen of Nato) was the referee on Thomas Hamilton’s shotgun licence.

Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite. On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself

Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list ofLabour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.
The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. LordCullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local Labourluminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy’s club. Hamilton was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

‘commons clerk on trial after IT find thousands of images of children performing sexual acts’

Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption.

The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

Lyon used his computer “to pursue his interest and perhaps curiosity in this type of material. He searched for it on the internet and, when found, downloaded it for his delectation later”, said Ms Karmy-Jones.

Lyon, 38, from Stanford le Hope in Essex, denies 12 specimen charges of making an indecent image of a child between October 2001 and April 2002. “It is like a drug, you try one and you want to try something harder, and it has a snowball effect,” he is alleged to have told officers when arrested.

Lyon worked in the Upper Table Office, where he met MPs, the Speaker, and Deputy Speaker while checking parliamentary questions and administering early day motions. “He needed skills in computing and the internet,” said Ms Karmy-Jones. “He is an intelligent individual, and knew full well what he was doing.” When first interviewed, he allegedly told police he did not distribute material – “I just look at pictures.”

Ms Karmy-Jones told jurors: “This case is about child pornography – what others might call photos of child abuse. When I say child abuse, it may sound harsh, but it is the nature of these images which is central to the case. They are unpleasant and disturbing.”

She said the issue might be whether it was Lyon who downloaded the images. “We say it is clear he was that man.”

Under Blair’s government paedophiles get off with a slap on the wrist and never seem to suffer the full weight of the law – no shock there then!

In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain’s National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed “under caution” by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair’s government.

However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. Blair cited the impending war in Iraq as a reason for the D-Notice. Police also discovered links between British Labour government paedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal).

Tony Blair: stifling investigations of paedophiles in his Labour government.

According to media reports, the names of 2 former Labour Cabinet Ministers said to be `Household names` appear on the `Operation Ore ` list of subscribers to hard-core child pornography. The same FBI investigation, which led to the arrest of rock star Pete Townshend. So who are they Mr Blair?Now let’s consider the Tony Blair connection. The supercilious, criminal, treasonous little twat who ran this country for his Rothschild handlers for a decade before handing over to another potential contestant for paedophile. Blair had a hunger for power and prestige (and money) and he still has. He is a ravenous, craving mass of corruption – he has to be. He has to follow the demands of his Rothschild handlers because one way or another, the little shit is compromised.

Now let’s consider the Savile situation. While the British Media, BBC etc etc wish to keep it all “Savile” and perhaps a few other celebrities, it all goes far far deeper than that.

Second Palace memoir links Savile to Charles and Diana

Andrew Morton warned of Jimmy Savile’s closeness to the Prince and Princess of Wales in 1992 in his Diana biography, as I noted on Friday.

Now I see Sarah Goodall, a Lady Clerk at St James’s Palace, talked about Savile’s role as a royal marriage counsellor to Charles and Diana in her 2006 memoir The Palace Diaries.

“He arranged for them to meet in Dyfed in Wales so they could comfort flood victims together in public,” Goodall says in the book, ghosted by Lord Monson. “Their Royal Highnesses weren’t speaking at the time, so to bring them together was quite a feat…

“I stand there stunned at the thought of Jimmy Savile, the TV personality who utters curious warbling noises and dresses in weird clothing, helping His Royal Highness and the Princess of Wales to fix their relationship.

“Jimmy Savile may do great work for charity and children but he hardly seems the best qualified or most appropriate person to give marital advice.”

Later she expresses astonishment that the shell-suited star of Jim’ll Fix It is given a knighthood — but concludes that,  if he manages to save the royal marriage, perhaps he deserves it.

Now switch your brain into gear for a moment: A man like Savile or ANY celebrity (or non celebrity) who would get close to the monarchy – they would be vetted. There is no doubt of this not even a ball hair of doubt. So MI5 and others would know PRECISELY what Savile was. MI5 know what Prime Ministers have for breakfast and how often they release a stool per day. So let’s not play STUPID buggers shall we? I mean, of course, you can if you wish, that’s your prerogative but, if you do, please don’t get upset if I call you a fcuking fool! Ok?

Just an example:

You need to understand ONE thing: MI5 are British Intelligence, yes BUT, as “british Intelligence” they do not look after the British Public. Their remit is to “Defend the Realm” That “Realm” is the interests of the British Monarchy and establishment. YOU are not “The Realm”. What a hilarious and naive thought!

MI5 protect the interests of the Queen and Monarchy and they vet the BBC! Now THINK about that! It doesn’t take a lot of thinking and it is fact. You may be a British Citizen (or “subject” of the Lizard) but if you do not act in a way that is acceptable to the power establishment, then that same MI5 shall treat you as the “subversive” you are. That MI5 also were involved in the 7/7 bombing – a false flag attack on the UK mainland to achieve the same goal as the false flag in the US called 9/11. ALL to have the populations of the UK and US believe there was a bogeyman out there just waiting to blow you up and, therefore, ensuring that you will accept the further infringement of your rights under the con of protecting you and that you would support the UK/US/UN imperialism against those countries who will not play ball with global world government and, therefore, they are “Rogue nations”.

They don’t vet the BBC? They don’t work for the Crown? Really? Then let me repeat:

Mr Tony Benn (Chesterfield)

“There is no question whatsoever—I am not seeking to blame everybody in the security services—that there have been people working in high positions in MI5 and MI6, who have used the power vested in them under the so-called well-tried mechanisms of the Maxwell Fyfe directive to undermine political democracy in Britain.

Then, of course, we come up against the justification for their action, and that is where the constitutional areas become most important. Anyone who has read any of the histories on these matters will know that the security services do not feel in any way responsible to the Government of the day. They believe they are responsible to the Crown. They represent the Crown in order to deal with subversion. I shall try to define the Crown and subversion in a moment.

The methods used by the security services must be set out. There is widespread vetting not only of civil servants, but, of course, of those in defence industries. The Clerk of the House and all the officials of the House are vetted by the security services. This was revealed in evidence submitted to the Committee of Privileges of which I am a member. That says a lot for the division between the legislature and the Executive, because the Executive vets the officials of the legislature. The BBC is vetted down to the level of anyone is involved in the preparation of current affairs or news. The research assistants of Members of Parliament are vetted. We know that from my hon. Friend the Member for Islington, North (Mr. Corbyn), who brought the matter to the House.

The Crown is the code name we use for those central areas of Government in defence, intelligence and international relations—a state within the state—that the Government, and, I regret to say, previous Governments, did not wish to be subject to parliamentary scrutiny or discussion. The Crown is a term used to cover a concrete emplacement surrounded by barbed wire that the Home Secretary thinks needs fresh protection. It is not that he intends it to be subject to public scrutiny.”

 

Now, if you think for one moment that the British Intelligence services did not know about Jimmy Savile and do not know about so many others – including those in the Royal Family of which Louis Mountbatten was just ONE – then you are, quite frankly, immensely naive, ignorant or, just a simple minded idiot. So then, WHY would Prince Charles and the rest of the Monarchy (while Diana couldn’t stand Savile, it seems, from reports) entertain this sleazy little entertainer? Do you also think that THEY did not know? This sordid little shit was on the inside of the Royal Family because the British Royal Family are into what he was into!

 

Now consider Esther Rantzen and the rest of the BBC multitude who knew what was going on. Think about who shut these people up. The heads of the BBC right? Noone else would or could have (assuming Esther isn’t into it herself and who could blame you if you now seriously questioned that?). So the head honchos at the BBC silenced anyone who would have been prepared to speak out. Now why would the heads of the BBC protect this sleazy little bastard? I mean, it wouldn’t just be for ratings. They could sack him, get rid of him and the BBC would carry on with other entertainers. No-one would really miss Savile as such. So why? Because Savile was being protected by even higher powers (OR the BBC Executives were a part of it). There are no two ways about it, it is one or both of the two scenarios. However, let’s look at the former: Who would be protecting him? Well, as the man himself would say, “I can get jobs done”. Those “jobs” would extend into the Royal family itself. They would include work on behalf of Israel. Was Savile a Mossad agent? Sound crazy? Well how about this man?

Cliff Richard – MI5/6 Agent.

Yes indeed! Cliff Richard was (and may still be) a British Intelligence asset.

Recently declassified MI5 papers sensationally reveal that Peter Pan of pop, Sir Cliff Richard, was recruited by British intelligence services in the late 1950s. He remained a frontline agent throughout the cold war.

Squeaky clean Sir Cliff went by the code name Harry Web-of-Deceit amongst Whitehall officials. Cliff’s paymasters gave the bachelor boy (although apparently ‘a bit of a James Bond on the side’ according to one anonymous source) a brief to release his soft pop balladry as a smokescreen for more clandestine activities. Having successfully established himself as a sleeper in the pop world he was ‘activated’ in 1968, during his performance of Eurovision entry, Congratulations, at London’s Albert Hall in 1968.

‘Sir Cliff was Mr Wiretap himself’ explained Tony Newbold, a retired intelligence officer ‘It was bloody brilliant: nobody suspected a thing. He was the best bug-er we had – a departmental accolade that spread, I’m afraid – for which I would like to humbly apologise.’

Now look at this photo of Savile with Peter Sutcliffe and Frank Bruno. What a VERY odd combination! But there’s something in that handshake that leads us back to George Robertson, Thomas Hamilton and the freemasonry fraternity.

You see, if you look at any freemasonry outfit, they are all heavily involved in child charity. The Freemasons get heavily involved with the disabled, children and families with “social problems” from alcohol to drug abuse. Now before going off on some rant saying “freemasons do good work” etc, perhaps some of them do. Perhaps. But the whole ethos of freemasonry is secrecy (just look up Parliamentary archives and you will see numerous instances of it). Good does not work in the darkness of secrecy, it works in broad daylight. What better wat to get your hands on kids who are vulnerable either physically, mentally, emotionally or all three? No better way than acting as Savile did! Does that mean all freemasons are paedophiles or even have the slightest idea of what happens higher up the chain? NO!. Freemasons, as we all know, do not get introduced to the “greater secrets” until they achieve the level above their existing degree so HOW could a freemason ever say “We don’t do that?” They do not even know the detail of the degree above!

 

BBC 5 LIVE 6th November 2012: Freemasonry paedophiles:

Somehow, I feel this video won’t stay up long on Youtube so download while you can.

You’ve got to ask yourself why Frank Bruno would want to visit Broadmoor and meet with people like Sutcliffe while he also met with Ronnie Kray. Again, introduced to him by Savile. What was the point?

Bruno is another big children’s charity man. I am not suggesting anything by that but it shows that even the innocent (if a freemason ex boxer who did cocaine can be called innocent) can be used by the users, totally unaware of the practices of the other.

No! Of Course Prince Charles would have not the foggiest idea of who and what Jimmy Savile was. Don’t be ridiculous! The Prince, his father and mother just happen to be the people who the British Intelligence services report to.

Ah! “The British Intelligence services didn’t know that Savile was a paedo”?

Please look in the mirror closely at your scalp to see if there are any scars left over from your lobotomy!

The Prince may regret his association with the master paedo? No, not at all. He’ll be reminiscing of the good times won’t you Charlie?

Meanwhile, isn’t it bizarre just how many Princes get close and have such good relationships with paedos? We had Philip with Louis, Charlie with Jimmy and Andrew with Jeffrey!

So what the hell is the problem with Harry flashing his dick and ass at the world? Quite normal really comparatively speaking! He’s perhaps just getting warmed up!

Then you have Harriet Harman! Bets please!

 

Anyone want the big fat cigar?

 

UPDATE 28th October 2012:

Thank you Sonia! The Daily Express (for those of you who require mainstream media outlets for your “truth”) states it:

“Then there is the question that overshadows the whole Savile ­inquiry: why was he allowed to ­become so close to royalty and government? Surely it is the job of the security services to investigate the lifestyle of those who have access to our figureheads?

Yes indeed it is Sonia and you can take it to the bank that the Security Services AND, therefore, the Royal Family knew exactly what he was!

And now another update: 5th November 2012:

The Sunday Times!

But while they get close and so many will ask these questions regarding Charles’ “judgement” in befriending Savile, they will NEVER go close enough for the sheer fear of being destroyed – either the reporter, the Editor or the paper itself and its owners. So, above we see the Daily Mail saying ANDREW BROUGHT THE ROYAL FAMILY INTO DISREPUTE. Now we have CHARLES DOING THE SAME – EVEN WORSE! While Andrew’s article points to “sordid association” and “unwise”. STRANGE HOW BOTH BROTHERS HAVE HAD RELATIONSHIPS WITH PAEDOPHILES ISN’T IT? BUT WILL THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PICK THIS UP AND RUN WITH IT ASKING REAL QUESTIONS?

How is it just “unwise” of either of them? When you get TWO of them it becomes a little more than “unwise” don’t you think? How about a mainstream headline asking the question:

ARE OUR ROYAL FAMILY – the SAXE COBURGS of GOTHA who are defrauding the British people of £millions by way of using a Constitutional office’s right to hold the mineral rights of the Commonwealth – also PAEDOPHILES?

And don’t say that is slander because ANY other family who just so happened to have long standing relationships with two different paedophiles would be investigated by the Police for paedophilia themselves while just about 100% of society would be demonising that family and shunning them. But no, not our royals eh?

This is a SICK COUNTRY and it is sick because it is run, at the very top, by sick people!

Rebekah shag you yet Davey boy?

Or is it just the norm with you, the wife, Rebekah and the Obama’s etc having an inter-racial gang bang in chequers? Do the girls and boys from the primary school down the road get called in occasionally to party too? Not suggesting anything, just asking a question. The answer is either yes or not so nothing to get hot and bothered about Davey boy!