Earthling

The Monetary System

Posted in Money, Politics by earthling on April 5, 2015

I WANT TO SEE THE “WHITES” OF UKIP’s EYES!

Gerald O'Brien UKIP

Gerald O’Brien UKIP

 

Dear Mr Taylor,

I have created a “Change.org” petition regarding the need for a discussion/debate around the issue of money issuance in the UK. Please see the link:

https://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-david-cameron-mp-nicola-sturgeon-to-provide-the-uk-electorate-with-a-public-televised-assessment-and-debate-regarding-the-issuance-of-currency-within-the-united-kingdom-2

On your website, it is stated:

SOMETHING TO SAY TO US?

Do you want to tell us anything?

Ask a question? Complain about something?

Get us to do something for you?

Whatever it is, we value your input and will always respond.

Contact:

Norman Taylor (chairman UK Ashford branch)

Tel: 01233 822 132

Email: normantaylor@email.com

What I would like you, and all members of the UKIP party to do, is sign this petition. While I speak of a solution to the problem known as “Mathematically Perfected Economy”, I realise many people will not be accustomed with the term and, as such, I am not asking that people support the implementation of it but simply that they support the necessity for there being a public discussion of the matter of money issuance. From this, it would then be possible to assess and discuss in greater detail, how money works presently and how that is the underlying issue which impacts every facet of life from austerity to war. All wars are resource wars in one form or another. The reason for such is due to the debt interest applied to nations and the fact that the interest portion of the debt does not circulate in any economy. Since it does not, it is necessary for nations to compete but not only compete but to war. The only way for one nation to pay off (or, I should say, continue to service) its debt is by acquiring the principle of another nation’s economy.
The accumulation of wealth by the few is through what is, in fact, insider trading. The use of Hedge funds and other vehicles make this possible.
Alan Greenspan joined Paulson & Co just before the crash in 2008 (he joined around Jan 2007) and advise Paulson on the mortgage market (insider knowledge of course) and Paulson’s Hedge Fund made a killing (one of the largest if not THE largest gains a HF had ever made) by shorting the market.
In addition, on this side of the Atlantic, Ken Clarke joined Centaurus Hedge Fund around the same time.

Nigel-Farage-Ukip-Debate-Nigel-Farage-TV-Debate-Political-Parties-Debate-On-TV-551204
Our Cabinet Ministers, Prime Ministers and Corporations and Banks, write the legislation which they obviously know will impact certain industries and even nations. People like Tony Blair (and many others) then, having pushed through legislation on others’ behalf then find themselves paid off by being provided with jobs with the like of J.P.Morgan. None of this is difficult to comprehend or see.
I could write a script on this but I will stop there. I’ll just end by saying that it is the present monetary system whereby banks issue currency (not create it) and charge interest upon money they don’t actually have (thereby they bring no consideration to the contract/loan) but have been given a legal privilege to issue. That interest does not exist anywhere in any economy, therefore, it is easily seen why and how all countries are in debt. There is a net global debt which is actually impossible to exist unless there is some entity which that debt is owed to. That debt is due to interest and due to the fact that both, governments and individuals all have to use a form of currency which is legally owned by a global banking system. The fact is that it is individuals who create money (its value) and that banks are unnecessary middlemen in any transaction between two individuals. All banks do to make a profit is demand that our promissory obligations to one another go through their system and they “re-present” these obligations to one another with their versions (electronic or cash) of our promissory notes.
They obfuscate the true nature of what is going on and it is, in fact, outright fraud.

Billboard3
I would appreciate your, and Gerald O’Brien’s response to this. I would hope UKIP would positively support such a discussion since it is this issue which is causing many of the symptoms your party and this country is concerned about.
Regards,

PS: I have a background in both, University level Physics and Business Studies.

 

Of course I understand what I will get (if anything) is some wooly worded thank you and “that’s interesting” and “UKIP are committed to….” etc.

Just wanted it on record. Another party (of the people) ignore the real issues and core problem.

Because to be a party, you must adhere to the establishment rules otherwise you would never BE a party (or last as one).

All good fun! Keep putting your X in the box. After all, that’s how they see you – as an X, a thumb print, an idiot.

OFCOM decide! UKIP is a party!

Posted in Politics by earthling on March 17, 2015

Just a quick one. I have to laugh (and do).

Here we see OFCOM deciding if UKIP is worth calling a major party. You don’t decide kippers, the British establishment does! And yet you think that UKIP fight the British establishment because that’s what Mr Farage tells you!

And you swallow it!

It reminds me of David Icke and his “We will be unregulated” (when speaking of the People’s Voice”). Indeed Dave and indeed Nigel. Two men who talk absolute shite!

But you will continue to because the British public (the majority at least) are really dumb bitches!

Ofcom decides

 

OFCOM RECOGNISES UKIP!

“Oh thank you your majesty!”

Ahhh why the hell do I bother!

UKIP xenophobic – Israel not!

Posted in Politics by earthling on May 8, 2014

Farage racist? No

 

Racist? Really? Let’s compare UKIP wanting to simply control our borders with THIS absolute total racism which the 3 major UK parties support to the hilt through each of their respective “Friends of Israel” shall we?

What I would like to know is UKIP’s view of this. UKIP? Care to comment?

 

Netanyahu racist? Yes

Is UKIP saying “Whites only”? No. Is UKIP saying “only christians”? (we are, after all, according to our constitution and the Head of state being the head of the Anglican protestant church – neither of which jobs she has done well- a christian nation of sorts) No. So, tell me, where’s the racism? But here’s the point: Why doesn’t Nigel throw this in the “tripod’s” faces? There’s a number of fundamental “bullets” Nigel could use but doesn’t. That concerns me. No-one could argue with him.

Ah I just remembered why Nigel doesn’t use this very basic issue to his advantage. He’d never get any airtime on UK media and after he said it he and UKIP would be destroyed. Sorry, that was naive of me Nigel.

But you know only too well don’t you?

After all, looks like you’ve sold out. Perhaps that’s why you’re getting the media attention far more these days. And I thought it might be for the right reasons. Well, there’s my naivety showing once more Nigel.

What a wicked web they weave!

FOI UKIP

http://foi-ukip.org

 

These jews: They just infiltrate everywhere don’t they?

Once upon a time….

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, New World Order Religion, Politics, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on April 27, 2014

In Britain:

Cameron racism

10 white Englishmen, 2 poles, 2 turks, 3 Iraqis, a pakistani and a trinidadian went to a job interview for the position of Electrician.

8 of the 10 Englishmen had full Electrical qualifications while 2 of them only had domestic installer grades with zero experience. Of the two, however, one was gay.

The two poles were plumbers, the turks had no qualifications at all, the 3 iraqis had just arrived in the UK from Baghdad and couldn’t speak a word of English, the pakistani was a chef and the trinidadian was just very cool man!

There were 6 jobs to be filled and because Lenny Henry felt there was a need for a larger ethnic minority representation in the number of electricians in the country, one englishman was given a job, one pole, one turk, one iraqi, the pakistani and the trinidadian.

Because neither of the non white englishmen were qualified, the government provided them with free electrical courses and the company had to wait for their completion of the course before they could fill the roles.

The Englishman also had to complete the course because he was one of the two who didn’t have full qualifications. The company chose the gay candidate to ensure that their stated policy – in line with legislation – that they did not discriminate on the grounds of race, colour, sex, disablement or sexual orientation, was proven in practice. Also, Peter Tatchell was keeping a close eye on the decision and the company shit itself at the prospect of having a lawsuit on its hands.

So not a single fully qualified Englishman got any of the jobs. Equal opportunities you see! Multicultural Britain.

The company was sued for not employing an adequate number of iraqis.

David Cameron was asked to comment on the situation and said “This isn’t UKIP or BNP Britain you know! This isn’t a homeland for white British people only you racist bastard!”

Globalism! And the little jewess smiled!

 

In Israel:

10 jews, 20 Palestinians, 3 ethiopians went to a job interview for the position of electrician.

The 10 jews were ex bankers, the 20 palestinians were all fully qualified and the 3 ethiopians were too.

There were 12 jobs to be filled but the company had to re-advertise for 2 of them because they only had 10 jews to employ while the palestinians were shot and the ethiopians jailed without trial for 3 years before being kicked out of Israel.

David Cameron was asked to comment on the situation and said “Israel is Britain’s friend. It is the only democratic nation in the middle east and it is the jewish homeland. Mr Netanyahu assures me that all the palestinian and ethiopian candidates were terrorists. No, Israel has never apologised for the King David Hotel bombings because it never happened!”

Homeland for the jews Rock solid

 

Yep, have the entirety of Europe and the UK “multicultural” brought into being by the jews and anyone complaining is a racist, bigot and anti semite BUT make sure, at all costs, that the jews have their very own patch of dirt all to themselves.

Aye David you’re a wanker as are all your predecessors.

Christian country my arse! “Christianity” slips off your tongue as you suck judeo dick!

Share amongst the Nation

Posted in Politics by earthling on February 19, 2013

For some reason, I completely overlooked a response I got from Nigel Farage’s office in the EU Parliament approximately 2 years ago.

I think it is VERY important that this be shared. It is also important to notice the PERCEPTION of individuals and how one individual’s perception (without giving one an opportunity to correct that perception) can go a long way to demonise an individual in the eyes of others.

If one simply chooses to take one’s PERCEPTION as a fact and then use that perception against another without giving the other recourse to correct a misperception (either purposefully conceived or otherwise) then that can lead to bad feeling, jail or even war between countries.

It is a lack of communication and/or willingness to listen to other opinions which can cause all of these things so very easily. You will see what I mean when you read the following:

 

His office's words. I want to hear it from his own mouth.The country DOES need to understand this otherwise they cannot appreciate the full reasons for potentially voting UKIP and getting us out of an UNLAWFUL EU membership. They also need to know the full depth of the deception against them. If they don't, they will just continue swinging their vote fro left to right. So my concern is this: If Mr Farage is unwilling to strongly put this message out then he is trying to steer things in an other direction STILL controlled by the establishment.

His office’s words. I want to hear it from his own mouth.
The country DOES need to understand this otherwise they cannot appreciate the full reasons for potentially voting UKIP and getting us out of an UNLAWFUL EU membership. They also need to know the full depth of the deception against them. If they don’t, they will just continue swinging their vote fro left to right.
So my concern is this: If Mr Farage is unwilling to strongly put this message out then he is trying to steer things in an other direction STILL controlled by the establishment.

Subject: RE: Results from form on website…
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:13:50 +0200
From: nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu
To: Removed@hotmail.com
CC: annabelle.fuller@gmail.com

Dear Mr (Earthlinggb)
Thank you for your very pertinent questions, to which, however, in your closing “opinion”, you seem to assume certain answers.
The UKIP is opposed to the global politico-commercial cartel, in which the Rothschilds are prominent, and which underpins a number of supra-national organisations, notably the UNO and the EU.  If that cartel has undue influence on some members of UKIP, then I can only say that UKIP has its moles, traitors and agents provocateurs, just as you would expect in an anti-establishment party.  They expose themselves fairly regularly and we expel them as regularly.
UKIP is not “aligned with Zionist policy”.  We are in favour of democratic, sovereign nation-states, however, and are opposed to multiculturalism, which we see as a form of apartheid.  How this will play out in the Levant, with a minimum of bloodshed and loss of democratic structures, is not clear.
The written constitution of the UK consists of Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights and numerous statutes, which are now being over-ridden by a treacherous EU-élite, which has no justification whatever for its actions, and which has made a mockery, among much else, of the Coronation Oath.
The CFR, whose “shop-window” and recruiting-office is the annual Bilderberg-Meeting, must be seen as the epicentre of the conspiracy, of which the UK’s treacherous EU-élite is a part.  Throwing off the EU is therefore a key objective in opposing the formation of global, totalitarian government; but this is not something the public will readily understand – and does not need, at this stage, to understand – as long as the objective of dissolving the EU can be attained.  Moreover, as a poorly-funded, anti-establishment party, UKIP’s capacity to reach the public is severely limited.  We simply cannot afford, financially or tactically, to depart from our simple anti-EU message, at this time.
The face-book forum is too time-consuming to permit much dialogue.  I apologise, for example, concerning the ability of our correspondence-team, to answer your questions systematically.  We do not have the resources to do this, and Mr Farage has no time at all to answer general enquiries.  You won’t find any national party-leader who does.
Yours sincerely
Andrew S. Reed
Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels
www.ukip.org    www.ukipmeps.org

From: Fuller Annabelle [mailto:annabelle.fuller@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 June 2011 15:42
To: FARAGE Nigel
Subject: Fwd: Results from form on website…

This guy has been causing real problems on Nigel’s facebook page, being anti semitic and offensive. Can you check that Nigel is okay with me saying that given his comments on the facebook page he does not wish to interact with this person?

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Office of Nigel Farage <admin@nigelfaragemep.co.uk>
Date: Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:35 PM
Subject: Results from form on website…
To: annabelle.fuller@gmail.com===[Contact Nigel]===Name: Earthlinggb

Address: None of your business.

E-mail: Removed for privacy

Your Query: Questions:

1. Does Lord Pearson have ANY affiliation with the Rothschild family or close associates either professionally or personally?

2. Is UKIP aligned with Zionist policy?

3. If the answer to 2 above is yes then please justify the existence of a “Jewish state” when, across the world, the ideology of having a state dedicated to a particular, racial, cultural or religious philosophy is considered racist and bigoted? As you are well aware, when the BNP suggest such in any manner for the UK, they are demonised as hardened racists. YET, the British government have the audacity to support – and demand British people support – a state of Israel which is precisely the antithesis of that of the multiculturalism they demand at home.

4. Please state those documents which, together, compose the British Constitution.

5. Please confirm your understanding of the current English Bill of Rights in terms of its legality on statute and the meaning of the phrase:

“And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God.”

6. Do you agree with both, David Cameron and Tony Benn, that politicians do not, never have and never should have, the power to transfer such powers (i.e. the sovereignty of our laws) to any other entity?

7. For Mr Cameron to state such emphatically as he does, he must draw this conclusion from some form of written (constituted) document which is binding by law otherwise he is speaking purely for himself and has no valid basis for making such a statement. Therefore, from WHERE does he draw this conclusion?

8. Do you agree that, as a government for and BY the people, such individuals in office and entrusted with the proper lawful use of such power, have a fiduciary duty toward the people of the United Kingdom?

9. Do you agree that David Cameron, by his own words, has implicated himself for continuing the same policy which he states, absolutely clearly and unambiguously, has never been within a politician’s power to do so?

10. Do you agree that the statement by Roy Hattersley regarding the deception by our governments in the 1970s regarding our participation in the EEC not affecting our sovereignty is, therefore, tantamount to treason and sedition at law?

11. Do you agree that with the monarch taking an oath to the British people – WHICH SHE MUST DO OTHERWISE SHE WOULD NEVER BE CROWNED BECAUSE HER POWERS ARE DEPENDENT UPON HER MAKING THAT OATH – that those servants of the Crown, and in particular, Parliamentarians and the Privy Council, when swearing an oath to the Queen, are, insodoing, simply swearing, once more to the people, that their entire raison d’etre is to support and protect the monarch in HER duties to the people who she sore HER oath to?

12. Do you agree that it does not necessarily require an army or force to subvert the sovereignty of a nation but such can be accomplished “peacefully” through economic warfare and for those in governmental office to legislate supportively of such? This would, therefore, be where the crimes of sedition and treason by certain members of government such as, of all people, our very own Lord Chief Justice Ken Clarke, would enter the frame. This harks back to the question I raised to Lord Pearson regarding Bilderberg and which Malcolm Wood readily acknowledged as of concern. Yourself, Lord Pearson and others know precisely why this is of concern and your acknowledgement of it makes clear you appreciate the issue. Mr Clarke IS a serious issue! He is a steering committee member and is fully involved in the organisation as are many others.

13. Do you agree that it is pure fallacy to suggest that the United Kingdom does NOT have a Constitution codified or otherwise for, if to suggest such would suggest there is no fundamental laws which apply to the governance of this country and, therefore, it would be, in fact, an anarchy with “government” and the state simply being an apparatus by the ruling class to impose their own wishes upon the people without having any lawful basis for such? Therefore, the word “democracy” would not apply and neither would the rule of law. Do you agree it is an absolute fallacy purely from the perspective that, for a sovereign nation to exist (or have existed) would require a constitution as is the case for any nation, organisation, political party and Corporation?

14. Why are you not bringing this solidly to the attention of the British public? Considering it destroys the whole validity of the EU.

My opinion of you Nigel is you\’re a fraud and a cheap one to boot. It\’s easy to stand up in the EU Parliament (a controlled venue) and make theatrical speeches which are then posted on Youtube which make you out to be \”Spartacus\” (My God!) but it\’s a lot harder to answer questions in public on your Facebook page isn\’t it?

As for your comment about not intentionally ignoring comments on your page, it doesn\’t quite hold water when then you resort to deleting them and then deleting the questioner entirely so he can no longer post questions YOU don\’t like.

Van Rumpoy may have the appearance of a damp rag but you have one of a Double Glazing salesman. You\’re just as transparent!