An Early Day Motion Apology?
I happened to stumble over this EDM in Parliament just as I’d finished a bowl of very green Broccoli and Stilton soup (homemade :-)) and I just about said “hello” to it again.
I’ve seen the EDM sponsored by these either ignorant idiots or (…?) but I haven’t seen anything relating to an “oops sorry!” from either one of them. Of course, I may have missed it since the parliament archives, as you know, are quite immense in scope.
But I wonder what these idiots feel like now.
But Fabian Hamilton eh? A jew, ex Leeds Councillor and not exactly stupid you would think. Then again….
Fabian Uziell-Hamilton (born 12 April 1955) is a British Labour Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for Leeds North East since 1997.
He was elected as a councillor to the City of Leeds Council in 1987, stepping down eleven years later in 1998. He was elected as the chairman of the Leeds West Constituency Labour Party in 1987, and he contested Leeds North East at the 1992 general election but was defeated by the sitting Conservative MP Timothy Kirkhope by 4,244 votes, gaining a 5.9% swing from the Conservative Party to Labour.
Hamilton is a signatory of the Euston Manifesto and the Henry Jackson Society. [Take a look at these two societies if you get the chance – The HJS has Richard Perle, William Kristol, Sir Richard Dearlove (ex MI5 head) and James Woolsey (ex CIA head) as members. Ain’t that nice?]
He has been married to Rosemary Ratcliffe since 1980 and they have two daughters and a son. He has been a member of Amicus since it absorbed his former union, the Graphical, Paper and Media Union. He is Jewish and speaks fluent French.
David Jonathan Edwards (born 26 April 1976) is a Welsh Plaid Cymru politician.
John Sampson Macfarlane Leech (born 11 April 1971, Hastings, East Sussex) is a British Liberal Democrat politician.
Sir Joseph Alan Meale (born 31 July 1949) is a British Labour Party politician who has been the Member of Parliament (MP) for Mansfield since 1987.
Gregory Thomas Mulholland (born 31 August 1970) is a Liberal Democrat politician in the United Kingdom, and is the Member of Parliament for Leeds North West.
Richard James Shannon (born 25 March 1955) is a unionist politician from Northern Ireland.
Of course, it’s just a coincidence but……
But you also have this last year from Shannon. Is he concerned about child offences now because he feels such a twat? While I wonder why the specific interest in getting data on just women offenders?
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140430/text/140430w0003.htm
The “Alternative” Paedophile
Paedophiles in government. Paedophiles in the monarchy. Paedophiles in the media and now, Paedophiles in the ALTERNATIVE media!
I wonder who those could be? I wonder if Davey and Sean (the big mouths of TPV, the guys who keep their spending of the money they raised from you close to their chests, the guys who sell you bullshit while they literally talk a globalist talk, have the hetero haters on the shows and the ex women MPs who have something to hide too) know who the alternative media paedos are? What do you think? After all, Davey knows it all doesn’t he? He knew about Saville (but didn’t say a word before it became public knowledge and then pretended he had said something. Even his ex colleague ran a story – yes Ms Poulton – saying Davey knew about Saville before it came out in mainstream when, in fact, he had never mentioned it at all beforehand but he likes you to think he did).
There is diseased shit under every rock folks so be careful who you consider to be on “your side”.
I have so much more to say about this paedophile eruption. Not exposing any, just commentary. But, right now, I just don’t have the “bandwidth”. I’ll get around to it though.
For now, here’s Bill Maloney – a brave guy I only met fleetingly once but his head was elsewhere I guess at the time. By the way Bill, if you stumble over this: The Bradbury Pound is the entirely wrong answer (sorry to those who believe otherwise).
One of the best things people could do (but won’t) is for them to drop their belief system in “heroes” – either those in uniform or those on the TV and in positions of (seeming) power.
But they won’t and you know why? This is why:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01zxmrv/the-men-who-made-us-spend-episode-1 (How long this will be on BBC iPlayer I don’t know but it’s the mentality – the “zombies”, those who are so easily led – which maintains the “heroes”. However, as you will see, we’re making “heroes” out of boxes too. The majority of humanity is dumb to the bone and so easy for the elite to manipulate that it’s not the elite – as perverted, sociopathic and psychopathic as they are – who are the problem, it’s the “zombies”. They are who scare the pants off me.)
And if you decide to watch the above and find it at all interesting, you may find the deeper probe into planned obsolescence even more interesting:
We’ll “buy” anything that’s “sold” to us as “Just what you need to be sexy!”
Meanwhile, back to paedophilia. There were once “perverts” and “poofs” – guys who liked to give other guys guy fluid up their ass or to swallow (let’s just call a spade a spade shall we? Or is the reality of it meant to be politically ‘correctified’ and brushed under the carpet like the time they themselves were “in the closet”? But they were given a name: “homosexuals”. Homosexuality was the mane of their “thing” rather than heterosexuality. But you see, having been given a name, the next step (over time) was to ‘normalise’ it and so those who considered it abnormal were then given a name: Homophobes and political correctness (arbitrary policy decided upon by the government(s) which you all know are corrupt – except, as in this case, when you THINK they’re doing the “right thing” under pressure from society (when in fact the elite steer what they want you to accept, you idiot)) put the negative focus on those who disagreed with the normalisation of it.
And it’s all done by ‘grassroots’ pressure groups and academics.
What we now have is the next step in human “enlightenment” which is slowly, delicately (and it will take years/decades just as it did for the homos BUT it will come and all you ‘liberal’ parents out there will have nothing to say and no comeback when your sons and daughters are being fucked (yes let’s call a spade a spade again) by old men and women whose paedophilia has been “normalised”.
Well done Mr and Mrs “Liberal” for being so liberal! 😉 But then perhaps it’s you who want to fuck kids right? But soon any criticism of you will be considered “paedophobic” or “hebephobe”.
Why just males? Women are into it too! But that doesn’t fit the media narrative. It’s another attack on men.
All I’ll say to this piece is: BULLSHIT! You have to be one sick mother****** to want to have intercourse with a child!
But no, the academics and the media are working their “magic” again to slowly creep towards the acceptance and normalisation of the paedophile. Lock up your sons and daughters Mr and Mrs conservative because the liberals and the perverts are coming for them. But don’t speak out too loudly because you’ll be labeled and termed a “phobe” and, even worse, an “extremist”. Do you have christian values in this JUDEO-christian country of ours? Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You’re on a list! The tables have flipped and the once oppressed (although they brought it upon themselves for the sake of a sliver of land in the middle east) are now the oppressors and you, Mr and Mrs Christian will soon wear the yellow badge! It won’t be a star however, it will be a cross!
Jimmy Savile: A Royal bastard?
This is not a blog to “prove” something. It’s simply a question: Has anyone done a search of Jimmy Savile’s geneaology?
I was just doing a bit of research on the Bank of England going back to its first charter – an interesting read – and the name George Savile just popped up. But it happened to not just be “George Savile” but “George Savile of Yorkshire” of all places. It turns out George Savile was the Marquess of Halifax. The genealogy search I can do (and it’s getting me nowhere) is hopeless but there have been a few Barons, Earls and Marquesses with the name Savile. Even one James Savile, Earl of Sussex in 1647.
Ok but that’s a long shot isn’t it? Well I wonder if it is. Because, you see, the British Royal Family are HUGE on genealogy. It is one’s ancestry, after all, which determines how high up the royal tree you are. Also it is ancestry that must be proved to the genealogist if one is a member of St. John of Jerusalem (the Queen’s English chapter of the Knights of Malta). Look up the St. John of Jerusalem’s constitution and you will read just how “racist” (couldn’t get more racist than determining worth in an organisation based upon blood) our monarchy is.
But there’s something else which makes me think that perhaps Jimmy was related (quietly) to the monarchy. Why did he refer to his mother as “Duchess”? Some coincidence isn’t it?
So then add that to his embrace by the monarchy into their very core AND, obviously, his protection by them and their intelligence services.
I’d put money on Jimmy Savile being a royal bastard!
Anyone with better access to Ancestry sites might wish to poke around a bit.
Think about it. This guy didn’t get access to all he got access to for just being a DJ and BBC personality.
Perhaps someone has already looked into this. I don’t know. If not, I think it may be worth a search.
David Icke: Jim’ll fix it!
Yeah I know, it’s nothing to do with Icke but when you realise just how many hits your website gets from a “David Icke” subject heading, you’d do the same.
I’m a “whore” aren’t I? 😉 lol
But I just take the piss out of anyone who’s full of shit – if that happens to be the world’s foremost “conspiracy theorist” and legend in his own bedroom, then so be it.
As for those who think they have something to say about me, carry on. Like the guy who likes to piss his money up the wall on a saturday night having been to a “Truth gathering” but then, the next day has to check the horse racing results before deciding if he can afford a breakfast for him and his missus! Hilarious bud. Just downright hilarious. But sad.
Anyhow enjoy the TV licence “ad”! 😉
Why do I do this? Because I can and it’s hilarious. You see, I don’t take this “truth movement” at all seriously. I started off doing so because what we’re up against is serious but when you recognise what a train wreck it all is and all this “love and light” stuff so many of you go on and on about and “twoof” when, as a whole, most can’t wipe their own arse, then you take that “Icke” step back and look again and seriously piss yourself at the incompetence of it all. The bastards we’re up against are whatever they may be and yes, to an extent, they may be incompetent BUT they know what they’re doing and they don’t have to be that competent to herd you all in whatever direction they choose. Icke’s a microcosm of that capability.
But here’s another thing, your “messiah” (god you’re all pathetic wimps) keeps sating “It’s the information that’s the star” and yet, that small few of you who hang to every word spat out by his conspiratorial majesty, attempt to attack (if you can call it that – it’s more like a limp penis trying to probe a vagina) the character of the people who lay information out on a plate for you. If it’s pointing at Icke then you completely ignore your messiah’s own words (and your adopted ideology off those words).
If Hitler came alive today and told you Tony Blair was a war criminal would you believe him?
I don’t give a flying **** what you think of me. If you’re competent enough to take information and process it then you are. If you’re not then you’re a lost, sad cause.
But one last thing: Icke names those who he knows have had an impact on him. Those have only had an impact, not because of who they are but because people are reading and understanding what they are saying. All they are doing is offering information (just like Icke) and all they are then saying is “make of it what you will” (just like Icke). What is “destroying” Icke is his own lack of transparency and his own (and those around him) incompetence.
I just add if you don’t or can’t see what is plainly before your eyes then you’re stupid. God do I get flack for that but hey, you are what you are. But, it is becoming very clear that many of you are not that stupid otherwise Icke and Tabatabai would be close to that £400K by now. It will be interesting if they make it and it will be interesting if they don’t. But listen David, if people were not willing or they were unable to process the information and see it for what it is, then neither me nor Sonia nor anyone else could have an effect on you. We’re just gatherers of information and we produce it (that’s what you do). It’s the people who are deciding what they make of that info and what they make of you. Don’t try to look for scapegoats for your own lack of transparency and incompetence David. You’re a “bigger” man than that aren’t you? Aren’t you?
Greetings from the awakened people of earth David.
David Icke & Jimmy Savile: It doesn’t add up!
Here is an article on David Icke’s website:
NOTE: ” But I have known about Savile since the 1990s…” AND “I knew that Savile supplied former Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath with young boys – I have been exposing Heath since 1998…”
Now listen to his interview on Liberty Tactics:
“I was first told that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile in 1997/98….”
So, get this: He writes about Heath in “The Biggest Secret” in 1998 but he makes NO mention of Savile which he admits he was told about at the very same time. Not only that but over the course of the next decade and the books he then wrote, he did NOT, in any one of them, mention Jimmy Savile. YET, he knew about Savile at the same time he knew about Heath? In his OWN words! So what’s the score David? IF you knew about Savile as you say you did, then why no mention of him in the books? You can’t use the excuse that Savile was alive because Heath was alive too.
I don’t give a flying dogfart about your mind challenged “protectors” who will make up ANY and ALL excuses for you. There is NO excuse.
Further, Lou Collins, like any other of the alternative media people who will interview Icke will not (and did not) question him on any of his assertions. Why? Is he the man that shall not be questioned? Question anyone and everyone else in mainstream and alternative but NEVER question this schmuck? Is he the “Godfather” of the alternative media or something? You ALL lick the bastard’s ass!
But this is a good time to include one last point. In an earlier blog of mine – before I had even heard of Sonia Poulton (which having now heard her I wish I hadn’t – my ears bleed for one thing) – I actually “thanked” her for covering a certain topic and here it is (taken from my blog re “Tony Blair, D notices, Princes, Popes, Politicians, “Pop pickers”, MI5, AND PAEDOPHILIA!”:
Dated October 28th 2012. So we can readily assume there was already significant contact between Icke and Poulton at this point (or is it just a synchronistic coincidence?).
Note: Poulton makes the following assertion on behalf of David Icke – “Savile’s BBC colleague David Icke, who went from respected broadcaster to laughing stock, was at the forefront of such claims in the Nineties when he named Savile and others as paedophiles.”
Ok Ms Poulton, NOW show us your journalistic integrity which, I have to assume, had you do due diligence on such an assertion and that you checked exactly when and through which media David Icke made these allegations regarding Savile at that time. Which book, press media or other broadcast media did Icke use for this and exactly when?
If you are unable to provide this then it proves two things: He never did claim such and YOU did not check your source(s).
Are YOU a repeater also Ms Poulton? A repeater of someone who then just so happened to become your paymaster less than a year later.
Or is this all just conspiracy theory on my part?
Whatever your answer, tell it to your faithful because it just doesn’t wash anywhere else.
So while that “paedophile infested establishment and its servile media sought to hold the line at Savile’s own abuse of young girls…” so, in fact, did David Icke because he did not expose Savile in ANY of his books from “The Biggest Secret” up until Savile’s exposure by the mainstream. WOW! Isn’t he ahead of the curve?
So unless PROOF to the contrary is forthcoming, we either take it that David Icke kept mum on Savile just as everyone else did OR David Icke knew nothing about it. His choice. I wonder which one he will make?
One final thing on Ms Poulton: If she has, as she claims, lists of pedophiles and, as she says, some may be alleged by people on the bandwagon but she seems to know there are some that are definites, then why is she not releasing the names? After all, TPV just had a mad barrister on the other day who did say something correct for once: If you are telling the truth and have facts on your side, releasing the names CANNOT be against the law. He then went on to say he couldn’t release names himself because the suspects were still alive – thereby, totally contradicting himself (as all of these so called “truthers” tend to do – even mainstream “real journalists” it would seem) but what do you expect from a pompous self serving, barrister who holds himself in such high esteem and believes the “gerries” are still out to get us?
Jesus Christ! This alternative media is a bigger joke than the mainstream!
Tony Blair, D notices, Princes, Popes, Politicians, “Pop pickers”, MI5, AND PAEDOPHILIA!
Search Hansard for statements relating to paedophilia in the Cabinet and provide “assurances”?
Cameron! Are you off your fricking nut as well as a criminal acting for the very bankers that want this stuff to happen? Cameron, you’re a dead man walking as are all the Lords and MPs in this establishment. This country will eventually come to the point of also decapitating the royal family.
But that is exactly playing into the hands of the bankers who want this to happen while you think they’re the people who are going to keep letting you play this game. Once you’re of no further use mate, they will hang draw and quarter you. Mark my words!
The following is JUST the Labour Party. You can be sure that just as many reside in the Conservative and LibDem ranks. Edward Heath was a paedophile yet that still hasn’t “come out” while Tom Watson suggests paedophilia reaches into the core of the British Government. Was it Thatcher’s aide? Or was it Tony’s? It doesn’t matter in a sense because this country is now waking up to the FACT that this country is a corrupt, steaming pile of shit with paedophilia lurking in every dark recess and corner of the street as well as in the dark corners of Whitehall. Westminster, the Houses of Lords and Parliament AND, what shall never come out (although it is obvious to those of us who have researched this in any depth and who are not in the slightest surprised by the facts now being brought to the country’s attention and to those of the population who would simply call us “mad conspiracy theorists”) is that this paedophilia stretches into the core of the British Monarchy.
It is not a “Big Society” we have in this country, it is a sick society!
The Labour Party’s Convicted Paedophile List.
 1. Liam Temple Labour Councillor Inciting a child into ‘gross’ indecency |
|
 |
2. Stewart Brown Labour Party Lord Mayor Child Pornography |
| 3. Sam Chaudry Labour Party Lord Mayor Elect & Labour Party Councillor Child Rapist |
|
|
4. Nicholas Green Labour Party Lord Mayor Labour Party Councillor 13 rapes & assaults on Children |
| 5. Keith Potts Labour Party Councillor Junior School Governor |
|
|
6. Alan Prescott Labour Party Councillor Molesting Children in a ‘Care-Home ‘Where he worked |
| 7. Terry Power Labour Party Councillor Sex attacks on boys |
|
|
8. Joseph Shaw Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography |
| 9. George Harding Labour Party Councillor Indecent assault on a child |
|
|
10. Lee Benson Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography |
| 11. Raymond Coates Labour Party Councillor Child rape |
|
|
12. Les Sheppard Labour Party Councillor Sex attacks and rapes on Children |
| 13. Martyn Locklin Labour Party Councillor Rape & Indecent assault on boys |
|
|
14. Nelson Bland Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography |
| 15. Greg Vincent Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography Films |
|
|
16. Alec Dyer Atkins Labour Party Councillor Member of the ‘Shadows Brotherhood ‘Peadophile Ring. 42,000 images of Children being abused |
| 17. Keith Rogers Labour Party Councillor 2,000 images of child pornography |
|
|
18. Paul Diggert Labour Party Councillor Grooming children & child pornography |
| 19. Peter Tuffley ( worked also for NSPCC & Barnardos ) Labour Party Personal assistant to Hazel Blears Caught in bed with a 13 year old boy |
|
|
20. Mark Trotter Labour Party Member & Super Activist Child rapist with Aids |
| 21. Yusef Azad Labour Party on the Greater London Assembly Computer seized in anti-Child Porn Operation |
|
|
22. Gilbert Benn Labour Party Councillor Molesting a boy |
| 23. David Spooner Labour Party Councillor Master…ed in front of Two little Children |
|
|
24. Mark Tann Labour Party member & Activist Repeatedly raped Two girls under Eight years old. |
| 25. Iestyn Tudor Davies Labour Party Councillor Repeatedly raped a Child |
PLUS+
| 26. John Friary Labour Party Councillor Grooming a child on facebook |
|
| 27. Steve Carnell Labour Party Councillor Downloading Child and Animal Porn |
|
| 28. Toren Smith Labour Party Councillor Found Guilty of 94.000 Images of Children Being Abused |
|
| 29. Johnathan Phillips Labour Party Councillor Downloaded Child Porn on His Memory Stick. It Was Found in The Town Hall After a Labour Party Meeting |
|
| 30. Phillip Lyon Labour Party Aide to Tony Blair His House of Commons Office Was Searched And He Was Found Guilty of Child Pornography |
| 31. Mark Burton Labour Party Councillor Sexual molestation of child. Trial continues.. |
|
| 32. Neil Redrup Labour Party Councillor Found Guilty of opening sexually explicit content in front of child. |
|
| 33. Timothy Edmeads Labour Party super activist and events organiser to Labour Lord Mayor guilty of sex assaults on 3 children. |
|
34. Adrian Cirket Labour Party councillor and GMB union official downloading hundreds of sickening images of child abuse in his family home where he lived with his wife and three children..35. Darren Geoffrey Pedley Labour party councilor and chairman of the board of governors at Sandbrook primary school found guilty of downloading and distributing child pornography… 36. Labour Councillor for Leicester Manish Sood found guilty of Grooming School kids for sex…37. Evil Labour Party Councill Candidate & Junior School Governor Richard Harris Found guilty of offering Junior school children £500 for sex.
.
|
. Tory Party General election candidate, Michael Powell – Convicted and jailed for 3 years for downloading hardcore child porn.
. Tory Party Councillor (Wickbar/Bristol) Roger Talboys – Convicted and jailed for 6 years for multiple sex attacks on childre
. Tory Party MP (Billericay) Harvey Proctor – Stood trial for sex offences of a sado-masochistic nature against teenage boys, and was forced to resign.
. Tory Party Councillor ( Stratford-upon-Avon ) Christopher Pilkington – Convicted of downloading hardcore child porn on his PC. Placed on sex offenders register and forced to resign.
. Tory Party councillor ( Coventry ), Peter Stidworthy – Charged with indecent assault of a 15-year old boy.
. Tory Party Mayor ( North Tyneside ), Chris Morgan – Forced to resign after being arrested twice in 2 weeks, for indecent assault on a 15-year old girl, and for suspicion of downloading child porn.
. Tory Party Liaison Manager on the London Assembly, Douglas Campbell, who’s job includes running the Tory GLA website – Arrested for allegedly downloading child porn. He is currently suspended while the Police investigation continues.
. Tory Party Councillor (Folkestone – in Leader, Michael Howard’s constituency), Robert Richdale – 41 year history of crime, involving 30 convictions and 5 prison sentences. Richdales enormous criminal record, which covers 10 pages of A4 paper, includes convictions for assault, theft, causing death by dangerous driving, forgery, drugs offences, possession of an offensive weapon, and sex attacks against underage schoolgirls. The Tory Party election campaign literature described Richdale as “a family man” who had a “compassionate personality”
. Lib-Dem Council candidate (Tower Hamlets), Justin Sillman – Convicted and jailed for 2 years for sexual abuse of young boys.
. Lib-Dem Councillor and Mayoral Candidate ( Sheffield ), Francis Butler- Prosecuted for indecent assault of a young boy.
. Lib-Dem Councillor ( Stockport ) Neil Derbyshire – Sexually assaulted a 16-year old boy in a public toilet. He was caught with a plastic bag containing lubricant, plastic surgical gloves, a condom, and underpants.
. Lib-Dem Councillor ( Preston ), Bill Chadwick – Charged with: Making an indecent photograph of a child, Incitement to rape, Incitement to murder, Incitement to kidnap, and Incitement to torture. Chadwick’s gay lover – Alan Valentine, is also a Lib-Dem councillor.
The Dunblane massacre:
Lord George Robertson (ex UK Defence Secretary 1997/98 and Sec Gen of Nato) was the referee on Thomas Hamilton’s shotgun licence.
Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite. On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself
Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list ofLabour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.
The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. LordCullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local Labourluminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy’s club. Hamilton was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.
‘commons clerk on trial after IT find thousands of images of children performing sexual acts’
Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption.
The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.
Lyon used his computer “to pursue his interest and perhaps curiosity in this type of material. He searched for it on the internet and, when found, downloaded it for his delectation later”, said Ms Karmy-Jones.
Lyon, 38, from Stanford le Hope in Essex, denies 12 specimen charges of making an indecent image of a child between October 2001 and April 2002. “It is like a drug, you try one and you want to try something harder, and it has a snowball effect,” he is alleged to have told officers when arrested.
Lyon worked in the Upper Table Office, where he met MPs, the Speaker, and Deputy Speaker while checking parliamentary questions and administering early day motions. “He needed skills in computing and the internet,” said Ms Karmy-Jones. “He is an intelligent individual, and knew full well what he was doing.” When first interviewed, he allegedly told police he did not distribute material – “I just look at pictures.”
Ms Karmy-Jones told jurors: “This case is about child pornography – what others might call photos of child abuse. When I say child abuse, it may sound harsh, but it is the nature of these images which is central to the case. They are unpleasant and disturbing.”
She said the issue might be whether it was Lyon who downloaded the images. “We say it is clear he was that man.”
Under Blair’s government paedophiles get off with a slap on the wrist and never seem to suffer the full weight of the law – no shock there then!
In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain’s National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed “under caution” by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair’s government.
However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. Blair cited the impending war in Iraq as a reason for the D-Notice. Police also discovered links between British Labour government paedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal).
Tony Blair: stifling investigations of paedophiles in his Labour government.
According to media reports, the names of 2 former Labour Cabinet Ministers said to be `Household names` appear on the `Operation Ore ` list of subscribers to hard-core child pornography. The same FBI investigation, which led to the arrest of rock star Pete Townshend. So who are they Mr Blair?Now let’s consider the Tony Blair connection. The supercilious, criminal, treasonous little twat who ran this country for his Rothschild handlers for a decade before handing over to another potential contestant for paedophile. Blair had a hunger for power and prestige (and money) and he still has. He is a ravenous, craving mass of corruption – he has to be. He has to follow the demands of his Rothschild handlers because one way or another, the little shit is compromised.
Now let’s consider the Savile situation. While the British Media, BBC etc etc wish to keep it all “Savile” and perhaps a few other celebrities, it all goes far far deeper than that.
Second Palace memoir links Savile to Charles and Diana
Andrew Morton warned of Jimmy Savile’s closeness to the Prince and Princess of Wales in 1992 in his Diana biography, as I noted on Friday.
Now I see Sarah Goodall, a Lady Clerk at St James’s Palace, talked about Savile’s role as a royal marriage counsellor to Charles and Diana in her 2006 memoir The Palace Diaries.
“He arranged for them to meet in Dyfed in Wales so they could comfort flood victims together in public,” Goodall says in the book, ghosted by Lord Monson. “Their Royal Highnesses weren’t speaking at the time, so to bring them together was quite a feat…
“I stand there stunned at the thought of Jimmy Savile, the TV personality who utters curious warbling noises and dresses in weird clothing, helping His Royal Highness and the Princess of Wales to fix their relationship.
“Jimmy Savile may do great work for charity and children but he hardly seems the best qualified or most appropriate person to give marital advice.”
Later she expresses astonishment that the shell-suited star of Jim’ll Fix It is given a knighthood — but concludes that, if he manages to save the royal marriage, perhaps he deserves it.
Now switch your brain into gear for a moment: A man like Savile or ANY celebrity (or non celebrity) who would get close to the monarchy – they would be vetted. There is no doubt of this not even a ball hair of doubt. So MI5 and others would know PRECISELY what Savile was. MI5 know what Prime Ministers have for breakfast and how often they release a stool per day. So let’s not play STUPID buggers shall we? I mean, of course, you can if you wish, that’s your prerogative but, if you do, please don’t get upset if I call you a fcuking fool! Ok?
Just an example:
You need to understand ONE thing: MI5 are British Intelligence, yes BUT, as “british Intelligence” they do not look after the British Public. Their remit is to “Defend the Realm” That “Realm” is the interests of the British Monarchy and establishment. YOU are not “The Realm”. What a hilarious and naive thought!
MI5 protect the interests of the Queen and Monarchy and they vet the BBC! Now THINK about that! It doesn’t take a lot of thinking and it is fact. You may be a British Citizen (or “subject” of the Lizard) but if you do not act in a way that is acceptable to the power establishment, then that same MI5 shall treat you as the “subversive” you are. That MI5 also were involved in the 7/7 bombing – a false flag attack on the UK mainland to achieve the same goal as the false flag in the US called 9/11. ALL to have the populations of the UK and US believe there was a bogeyman out there just waiting to blow you up and, therefore, ensuring that you will accept the further infringement of your rights under the con of protecting you and that you would support the UK/US/UN imperialism against those countries who will not play ball with global world government and, therefore, they are “Rogue nations”.
They don’t vet the BBC? They don’t work for the Crown? Really? Then let me repeat:
Mr Tony Benn (Chesterfield)
“There is no question whatsoever—I am not seeking to blame everybody in the security services—that there have been people working in high positions in MI5 and MI6, who have used the power vested in them under the so-called well-tried mechanisms of the Maxwell Fyfe directive to undermine political democracy in Britain.
Then, of course, we come up against the justification for their action, and that is where the constitutional areas become most important. Anyone who has read any of the histories on these matters will know that the security services do not feel in any way responsible to the Government of the day. They believe they are responsible to the Crown. They represent the Crown in order to deal with subversion. I shall try to define the Crown and subversion in a moment.
The methods used by the security services must be set out. There is widespread vetting not only of civil servants, but, of course, of those in defence industries. The Clerk of the House and all the officials of the House are vetted by the security services. This was revealed in evidence submitted to the Committee of Privileges of which I am a member. That says a lot for the division between the legislature and the Executive, because the Executive vets the officials of the legislature. The BBC is vetted down to the level of anyone is involved in the preparation of current affairs or news. The research assistants of Members of Parliament are vetted. We know that from my hon. Friend the Member for Islington, North (Mr. Corbyn), who brought the matter to the House.
The Crown is the code name we use for those central areas of Government in defence, intelligence and international relations—a state within the state—that the Government, and, I regret to say, previous Governments, did not wish to be subject to parliamentary scrutiny or discussion. The Crown is a term used to cover a concrete emplacement surrounded by barbed wire that the Home Secretary thinks needs fresh protection. It is not that he intends it to be subject to public scrutiny.”
Now, if you think for one moment that the British Intelligence services did not know about Jimmy Savile and do not know about so many others – including those in the Royal Family of which Louis Mountbatten was just ONE – then you are, quite frankly, immensely naive, ignorant or, just a simple minded idiot. So then, WHY would Prince Charles and the rest of the Monarchy (while Diana couldn’t stand Savile, it seems, from reports) entertain this sleazy little entertainer? Do you also think that THEY did not know? This sordid little shit was on the inside of the Royal Family because the British Royal Family are into what he was into!
Now consider Esther Rantzen and the rest of the BBC multitude who knew what was going on. Think about who shut these people up. The heads of the BBC right? Noone else would or could have (assuming Esther isn’t into it herself and who could blame you if you now seriously questioned that?). So the head honchos at the BBC silenced anyone who would have been prepared to speak out. Now why would the heads of the BBC protect this sleazy little bastard? I mean, it wouldn’t just be for ratings. They could sack him, get rid of him and the BBC would carry on with other entertainers. No-one would really miss Savile as such. So why? Because Savile was being protected by even higher powers (OR the BBC Executives were a part of it). There are no two ways about it, it is one or both of the two scenarios. However, let’s look at the former: Who would be protecting him? Well, as the man himself would say, “I can get jobs done”. Those “jobs” would extend into the Royal family itself. They would include work on behalf of Israel. Was Savile a Mossad agent? Sound crazy? Well how about this man?
Cliff Richard – MI5/6 Agent.
Yes indeed! Cliff Richard was (and may still be) a British Intelligence asset.
Recently declassified MI5 papers sensationally reveal that Peter Pan of pop, Sir Cliff Richard, was recruited by British intelligence services in the late 1950s. He remained a frontline agent throughout the cold war.
Squeaky clean Sir Cliff went by the code name Harry Web-of-Deceit amongst Whitehall officials. Cliff’s paymasters gave the bachelor boy (although apparently ‘a bit of a James Bond on the side’ according to one anonymous source) a brief to release his soft pop balladry as a smokescreen for more clandestine activities. Having successfully established himself as a sleeper in the pop world he was ‘activated’ in 1968, during his performance of Eurovision entry, Congratulations, at London’s Albert Hall in 1968.
‘Sir Cliff was Mr Wiretap himself’ explained Tony Newbold, a retired intelligence officer ‘It was bloody brilliant: nobody suspected a thing. He was the best bug-er we had – a departmental accolade that spread, I’m afraid – for which I would like to humbly apologise.’
Now look at this photo of Savile with Peter Sutcliffe and Frank Bruno. What a VERY odd combination! But there’s something in that handshake that leads us back to George Robertson, Thomas Hamilton and the freemasonry fraternity.
You see, if you look at any freemasonry outfit, they are all heavily involved in child charity. The Freemasons get heavily involved with the disabled, children and families with “social problems” from alcohol to drug abuse. Now before going off on some rant saying “freemasons do good work” etc, perhaps some of them do. Perhaps. But the whole ethos of freemasonry is secrecy (just look up Parliamentary archives and you will see numerous instances of it). Good does not work in the darkness of secrecy, it works in broad daylight. What better wat to get your hands on kids who are vulnerable either physically, mentally, emotionally or all three? No better way than acting as Savile did! Does that mean all freemasons are paedophiles or even have the slightest idea of what happens higher up the chain? NO!. Freemasons, as we all know, do not get introduced to the “greater secrets” until they achieve the level above their existing degree so HOW could a freemason ever say “We don’t do that?” They do not even know the detail of the degree above!
BBC 5 LIVE 6th November 2012: Freemasonry paedophiles:
Somehow, I feel this video won’t stay up long on Youtube so download while you can.
You’ve got to ask yourself why Frank Bruno would want to visit Broadmoor and meet with people like Sutcliffe while he also met with Ronnie Kray. Again, introduced to him by Savile. What was the point?
Bruno is another big children’s charity man. I am not suggesting anything by that but it shows that even the innocent (if a freemason ex boxer who did cocaine can be called innocent) can be used by the users, totally unaware of the practices of the other.
No! Of Course Prince Charles would have not the foggiest idea of who and what Jimmy Savile was. Don’t be ridiculous! The Prince, his father and mother just happen to be the people who the British Intelligence services report to.
Ah! “The British Intelligence services didn’t know that Savile was a paedo”?
Please look in the mirror closely at your scalp to see if there are any scars left over from your lobotomy!
The Prince may regret his association with the master paedo? No, not at all. He’ll be reminiscing of the good times won’t you Charlie?
Meanwhile, isn’t it bizarre just how many Princes get close and have such good relationships with paedos? We had Philip with Louis, Charlie with Jimmy and Andrew with Jeffrey!
So what the hell is the problem with Harry flashing his dick and ass at the world? Quite normal really comparatively speaking! He’s perhaps just getting warmed up!
Then you have Harriet Harman! Bets please!
Anyone want the big fat cigar?
UPDATE 28th October 2012:
Thank you Sonia! The Daily Express (for those of you who require mainstream media outlets for your “truth”) states it:
“Then there is the question that overshadows the whole Savile inquiry: why was he allowed to become so close to royalty and government? Surely it is the job of the security services to investigate the lifestyle of those who have access to our figureheads?“
Yes indeed it is Sonia and you can take it to the bank that the Security Services AND, therefore, the Royal Family knew exactly what he was!
And now another update: 5th November 2012:
The Sunday Times!
But while they get close and so many will ask these questions regarding Charles’ “judgement” in befriending Savile, they will NEVER go close enough for the sheer fear of being destroyed – either the reporter, the Editor or the paper itself and its owners. So, above we see the Daily Mail saying ANDREW BROUGHT THE ROYAL FAMILY INTO DISREPUTE. Now we have CHARLES DOING THE SAME – EVEN WORSE! While Andrew’s article points to “sordid association” and “unwise”. STRANGE HOW BOTH BROTHERS HAVE HAD RELATIONSHIPS WITH PAEDOPHILES ISN’T IT? BUT WILL THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA PICK THIS UP AND RUN WITH IT ASKING REAL QUESTIONS?
How is it just “unwise” of either of them? When you get TWO of them it becomes a little more than “unwise” don’t you think? How about a mainstream headline asking the question:
Earthling 
1 comment