What’s easier? To murder a Human or murder a Person?
HOW MANY YEARS HAVE I BEEN “RANTING” ON ABOUT THIS ISSUE FROM SO MANY ANGLES?
WILL THIS CONVINCE YOU? (Will ANYTHING convince you?)
“Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.”
Does it ever sink in with some people? Read it again (and again if necessary).
The main point is “are human beings” but only “potential persons”. Until you are a PERSON you have NO MORAL RIGHT TO LIFE. However, the LIE here is using the word MORAL which is substituted for LEGAL. What they are saying is, until that newborn child is recognised LEGALLY, there is no MORAL need to keep it alive. Yet, that child is a fully formed (and birthed) HUMAN BEING yet, as such, it has NO RIGHTS. THEREFORE, where is all this “Human Rights” business coming from? It is, in fact, and always has been, a deception of the very first order. Not one “PERSON” on this planet has “Human Rights” because you do NOT receive them UNTIL you are recognised as a PERSON.
IS IT NOT POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO USE YOUR MIND THAT “GOD” GAVE YOU TO EXTRAPOLATE FROM THAT FACT WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS AND ALL THE IMPLICATIONS OF IT? If not, then type into my search bar “legal person” or “human rights” and learn about it.
DO YOU REALLY HAVE NO CLUE AS TO HOW THEY USE THIS AGAINST US ALL EVERY SINGLE DAY IN LIFE?
DO YOU REALLY HAVE NO CLUE AS TO WHERE THIS CAN (AND WILL) LEAD?
(and where it has been leading since its invention)
Columbia Law Review: Concept of “the PERSON”: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/columbia-law-review-supports-earthling-re-human-rights-and-persons/
“The value of birth registration continues to be overlooked, according
to the report. It says that registration is a critical measure to
secure the recognition of every person before the law, to safeguard
the protection of his or her individual rights, and to ensure that
any violation of these rights does not go unnoticed.”
This Digest examines the situation of children who are denied a fundamental human right and who, in legal terms, do not exist.
BUT,,,, DO NOT make the mistake of thinking that registering your child (therefore, creating the person) is doing them a service. IT IS NOT!
You MUST understand the game being played here and, for that, I ask you to read my blogs on the subject. ALL of them!
https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/05/13/the-human-rights-act-deception/
DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHO AND WHAT THESE OXFORD UNIVERSITY PEOPLE ARE?
William Hague: “British government have the power to use chemical weapons on public”
This is so monumentally important that it is worth repeating:
In accordance with the UK government’s application of the Human Rights Act, there is NOTHING that President Assad of Syria is doing which the British government have not given themselves the legal right to do!
Let’s assume Assad is doing what our government says he’s doing: He’s killing his enemies in the circumstances of an insurrection against his government.
Let’s see what Hague and company would do in the circumstances of an insurrection against the British government: Oh look! They’d kill too! Because they’re legally entitled to!
1. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF ONE KILLS WITH A GUN, A TANK, A MISSILE, CHEMICAL OR NUCLEAR. IT KILLS! IT ENDS LIFE!
2. WHAT IS HAGUE GOING TO SAY WHEN ASKED WHAT DIFFERENCE THERE IS BETWEEN A GOVERNMENT KILLING BY THE POINT OF A GUN OR KILLING BY CHEMICAL WEAPONS? “A BULLET’S MORE HUMANE”?
3. THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 DOES NOT SPECIFY HOW THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT WOULD KILL DURING AN INSURRECTION. IF THEY BELIEVED IT WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT TO KILL A LARGE NUMBER DURING AN INSURRECTION WITH CHEMICALS, THEY WOULD DO IT! THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “HUMANE MURDER”!
So, what percentage of the British people are sick to the teeth of the Conservatives, Liberals, Labour and the monarchy screwing them and allowing bankers to destroy their wealth while they keep going to the bank having thieved your wealth from you?
I’d think, by this stage, it is the vast majority. So then, I’ll tell you what…..
DO WHAT ANY OTHER ARAB SPRING COUNTRY HAS BEEN DOING AND SEE HOW YOUR LOVELY FLUFFY, RESTRAINED GOVERNMENT RESPONDS! GO ON, I DARE YOU!
DEPRIVATION OF LIFE SHALL NOT BE REGARDED AS INFLICTED IN CONTRAVENTION OF THIS ARTICLE WHEN IT RESULTS FROM THE USE OF FORCE WHICH IS NO MORE THAN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY:
(C) IN ACTION LAWFULLY TAKEN FOR THE PURPOSE OF QUELLING A RIOT OR INSURRECTION.
DOESN’T IT SICKEN YOU WHEN YOU REALISE THAT MOST BRITISH JUST DON’T HAVE A CLUE? OR WOULD SAY “BUT THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN…” OR “IT SAYS ‘ WHICH IS NO MORE THAN ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY'”
OR DO THEY SAY ” ASSAD IS JUST KILLING FOR THE SAKE OF KILLING”?
IS HE KILLING? IS HE USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS? WHO DID HE GET THEM FROM? WHO DID SADDAM HUSSEIN GET HIS FROM? WERE THERE WMD’S IN IRAQ?
WILLIAM HAGUE IS A LIAR AS IS OBAMA. IF THERE ARE CHEMICAL WEAPONS BEING USED IT IS MORE LIKELY BY “AL CIA DA”
HOW DO YOU REASON WITH SUCH SCHMUCKS?
Can you imagine (THINK about it) sitting in a Directors meeting of a Chinese defence company which manufactures parts for missiles and you’ve just been told that the Chinese Premier has given the OK to supply 10 missiles to an organisation in England (like the EDL perhaps though far more militant) to allow them to launch attacks within the British mainland?
The Chinese Directors think to themselves “What do we care about Brits? And it’s worth another few million Yuan to us” as they laugh at the idea.
Do you think they give a damn about innocent human life? Do you think, therefore, they’d give a damn about innocent chinese life if killing them would progress a certain goal?
I’ve SAT in such a meeting (IN THE UK) and I have watched as braindead morons have laughed at the idea of war with Iran saying “Good for business”.
One of those who laughed: BOYD CLARK (you know who you are scum) – a lousy bastard if ever there was one!
YOU THINK YOUR GOVERNMENT GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU?
WAKE THE HELL UP!
Meanwhile, it does look like the little lying shysters in the British and American governments are lying through their teeth again and it’s Al CIA Da with the chemicals after all – All thanks to our western governments feeding it in quietly.
Washington Times: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/6/syrian-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-not-assads-regi/#.UhpJWV7vSyQ.facebook
Naughty boys William and Barack!! Go to your rooms!
Update 25th August 2013:
How convenient!
France 24: http://www.france24.com/en/20130825-syria-chemical-attack-evidence-may-have-been-destroyed-hague
Earthling 
2 comments