NHS Cancer vaccine trials: The Strange case of Elliot

Ok, first things first: There’s no “great reveal” in this blogpost. It is simply an “alert” for you to consider.

As you know, I’ve been doing these blogs for over 15 years now, on and off. I became aware something was ‘off’ nearly 20 years ago and, during the intervening years between then and now, I’ve developed what I consider (you may not) to be a form of “spidey sense” when it comes to stories put out by government and media while, if you’ve been listening at all over the past 4 years, you’ll have come to be more than a little wary of Doctors and our NHS.

As a quick aside, even the Royal College of Surgeons state that Doctors have a far higher level of psychopathy than the general population, although they ‘spin’ it positively as you’ll see….

Conclusions

This study showed that consultants at teaching hospitals score higher on a scale of psychopathic personality than DGH consultants, who in turn score higher than the general population. The prevalence of stress immunity as the overriding personality trait in consultants may better facilitate patient care.

https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/10.1308/rcsbull.2015.331

Even Business Insider quotes the result above and puts Surgeons in their top 5 of psychopathic careers. The worrying thing is, Sales people were allocated 4th place and I was, essentially, in Sales my entire career. Perhaps that accounts for my capability for sniffing one out and recognising bullshit when I see it. The question is: Did the Sales career instil the psychopathy or did I choose Sales because of an inherent psychopathy?

https://www.businessinsider.com/professions-with-the-most-psychopaths-2018-5#5-surgeon-6

By the way, I’m no psychopath! LOL I look back on life, however, and think things might have been easier, had I been.

Ok, enough bla!

I stumbled upon this article yesterday and was just thinking to myself “Isn’t it odd that, after all these decades (perhaps even a century or so), they’ve suddenly come up with a “cancer cure” and it just so happens to be based on mRNA vaccines? Do people seriously overlook things like this? The timing etc.”

Anyhow, as I continued to read, I somehow felt the compulsion to look at who this “Elliot Pfebve” was since it struck me as an unusual surname. I was also struck by the fact that Elliott had had “no symptoms” but that the cancer was found during a normal check up procedure. Nothing abnormal in that in of itself but still, it was just another thing that got my antennae buzzing.

Note that, in all the media coverage of “Elliot” (a real individual it so happens), they state “father of 4” and “Lecturer”. Ok, no big deal in that either BUT this is then the point my right eyebrow raised and my forehead creased up with frown lines. You see, Elliot is no simple “55 year old Lecturer’ at all. He’s not just ‘some lucky, black guy from Walsall who’s a lecturer and everyday father of 4’ he is, purposefully, portrayed as. Elliot Pfebve is FAR more than that.

Ok, ok, so what? He stood for election? Again, in itself, it’s ‘nothing’. But watch this…

Do you, by any chance, get the feeling from Elliot that 1. He’s not particularly worried but also, 2. He’s acting somewhat like an “Ambassador” for the treatment and the “world changing” nature of it? You have to also ask yourself: Of all the people with cancer in the UK, why him?

Why was a guy named “William Shakespeare” the first British recipient of the Covid 19 vaccine? Why was it £33M and not some other number, that Captain Tom Moore raised? Why did he have to be 100 years old and how the hell did an old man, walking 100 laps of his garden manage to “sell” this idea to the number of people he’d have to “sell” it to, to raise such a ridiculous sum of money out of nowhere? You have to be seriously naive to think this can be done without one hell of a lot of string pulling at very high levels of society and for there to be a politically expedient agenda behind it.

Meanwhile, Shakespeare has his jab in December 2020 and is dead by May. “Unrelated” said the NHS and, then, people may have accepted that a stroke was unrelated” but are they ignorant enough to STILL accept it? If they are, they deserve a Darwin Award. Not that I subscribe to Darwinism but, I’m sure, they will.

Anyhow, back to Elliot and apologies for the detour (but everything is connected, I assure you).

Did I say Elliot came across as some kind of “Ambassador”. I did, didn’t I?

Elliot Pfebve: “Lecturer”. 😉

You have to ask yourself how is it a pigeon-English, Zimbabwean politician ends up standing for election in Walsall, England?

Then not only that but he and his family also had proceedings in the US Courts against Robert Mugabe for slaughtering his family, which the US court decided FOR Mugabe because he had “Diplomatic Immunity”. Now consider the West (particularly Britain) supported and enabled the rise of Robert Mugabe. Yes, the relationship then later went south but, nevertheless, what are the chances that Elliot here holds a grudge?….

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/1302207.html

Alleged Opposition Harassment In Zimbabwe By-Elections – 2001-07-30

October 28, 2009 6:14 AM

---

Vote counting is underway in Zimbabwe in a crucial parliamentary election that is seen as a popularity test for President Robert Mugabe. Polling and campaigning in the town of Bindura was marked by intimidation and harassment of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). 

About half of Bindura’s 56,000 eligible voters are estimated to have cast ballots during the two-day election. Bindura is a farming and mining center 80 kilometers north west of Harare, the capital. 

The election is being held to fill the seat formerly held by Border Gezi, a government minister and one of President Mugabe’s most militant supporters. Mr. Gezi was killed in a road accident. 

Elliot Pfebv of the Movement for Democratic Change ran against regional governor and ruling-party candidate Elliot Manyika. 

Mr. Pfebve was detained by police for three hours Sunday and released without being charged, in what the MDC says was one of a number of incidents of harassment. 

Jonathan Moyo, the government minister of information, said Mr. Pfebve was held because he had been making too much noise near a polling station. 

Police also detained 21 MDC supporters for a day. The party says another 30 were kidnapped by militia from the ruling ZANU(PF) party. Their whereabouts are unknown, but the MDC says it suspects they are being held at a ruling party torture center. 

Before the election scores of people, mostly opposition supporters, were reported beaten up. 

Analysts say the Bindura result will be an indicator of success in the presidential poll next year, in which President Robert Mugabe is being challenged by MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai. 

In last year’s national parliamentary elections the ruling party won 61 of the elected seats in parliament with the MDC capturing 57.

https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2001-07-30-26-alleged-66952512/377984.html

“JUST” a Lecturer.

Then you find this….

He’s a UN Sustainability and Climate Change propagandist.

“JUST” a Lecturer!

Mugabe slaughtered his family. Mugabe was brought to power, in part, with British help. Another mRNA/BionTech vaccine could wipe out a lot of people. Psychopaths can be created.

His LinkedIn profile….

Just sayin’.

That’s one hell of a history and resume for just a common-or- garden “Lecturer with 4 kids”. Media normally wants to crawl all over a guy’s life. Imagine:

“Man, whose family’s slaughtered by Robert Mugabe is Britain’s first cancer vaccine volunteer!”

“Mr Pfebve has also written a book which promotes UN Agenda 21 and population growth – just like Bill Gates!”

Does Elliot actually have cancer? We’ll never really know. Just like we’ll never know with Charles and Kate.

All my point is, is this: This smells bad. Real bad. “I get a bad feeling about this”. However, the NHS will, no doubt, still get thousands lining up as guinea pigs.

Two jews to owe your life to (and pay in full): No refunds.

They just can’t help themselves, can they?

Imagine The Times writing about two christians (or muslims) in the same vein, suggesting the world owes their lives to them because, being christian or muslim, means they are so exceptional – they’re god’s “chosen people”. Imagine it.

Meanwhile, has anyone asked how many they’ve killed with their vaccine (in another vein)?

Now, the article:

A Greek Jew, two Turkish-born Germans, a Lebanese Armenian and an Israeli walk into a bar.
Actually – not a bar, but a research lab. And it’s not a joke. It’s about brilliant people, all of them émigrés, some Jewish, whose vaccines will hopefully save countless lives in Israel and the world.
And there is a back story – about a century of Jewish genius that changed the world. It is recounted brilliantly by Norman Lebrecht, a British journalist and novelist, and graduate of Bar-Ilan University, in his book Genius and Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World, 1847-1947.
Let’s begin with the vaccine.
On Friday, November 13, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed a deal with the giant US pharmaceutical company Pfizer to purchase millions of coronavirus vaccine doses. It was only days after Pfizer announced clinical trials showed the vaccine was 90% effective at preventing COVID-19. Later reports raised its effectiveness to 95%.

[Now, one has to interrupt here. “90% and 95% effective”? We are now in December a year later and it is quite obvious and proven that the vaccines are entirely noneffective. That statement didn’t age well, did it? Even if one believes in a “Covid 19” virus, one cannot but acknowledge the fact – as stated by Boris Johnson and his team of scientists and all around the world: “The vaccine does not stop transmission at all” so while people are still hospitalised and still die “of Covid 19”, we are adding to that figure with the deaths of younger people and very fit people who have taken the vaccine! I’d, therefore, suggest, not only is the vaccine noneffective against ‘Covid” but it is very effective in causing death.]

Pfizer’s CEO is Albert Bourla. Bourla is Jewish. He was born, raised and educated in Thessaloniki, in northern Greece. He left Greece with his wife when he was 34.
In early 2020, Bourla pushed to accelerate Pfizer’s development of a possible vaccine against COVID-19. He did this in partnership with the German company BioNTech, founded by a Turkish-born married couple, Dr. Ugur Sahin, 55, and Dr. Ozlem Tureci, 53, who were educated in Germany, where they now live and work. Bourla boldly ordered preparations for production to begin, well before approval from the US Food and Drug Administration.

[Sorry to interrupt again but I’d like you to take a look and read very carefully, what the two turks are saying:

Now, why wouldn’t a couple, working for Pfizer/Biontech, tell you “there’s good news” because they’re working on “more vaccines” to deal with the new variant while the existing vaccines didn’t deal with the existing variants! They wouldn’t say “we are safe” because – duh! – they wouldn’t sell any more bloody vaccines! How simple does this have to be for people?

Plus, they say “and we stated also that we will see a new normal”. These two said that! They used the term “new normal”. Well well well! That is telling because the “new normal” phrase is actually founded in the climate change literature well before “Covid” ever appeared. But as the developers of the vaccines and, in conjunction with Pfizer, they would, of course, support the whole idea of there being a “new normal” to create conditions where we’re ‘inoculated’ continuously while other, non medical approaches like lockdowns can also be introduced.

The new normal and Sustainability Stewardship: https://s3.wasabisys.com/billgateswantstokillus.com/index.html#/videos/Earthling/The_New_Normal-A8SQN61HaMA ]

Dr. Noubar Afeyan, 58, is co-founder and chairman of the biotech company Moderna. Afeyan is Armenian, emigrated from Lebanon to Canada and eventually did his doctorate at MIT. His company Moderna was born in the famous MIT lab of Prof. Robert Langer.
Moderna’s chief medical officer is Dr. Tal Zaks, an Israeli who completed his M.D. degree at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Like the Pfizer-BioNTech version, Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine, too, has proven highly effective in clinical trials. Dr. Zaks believes the initial doses will arrive in Israel in early 2021.
Now, back to the back story – how Jews changed the world during the remarkable one hundred years, 1847-1947, according to Lebrecht. Lebrecht begins his book with the Communist Manifesto, published in London by Marx and Engels in 1848, and ends in 1947 with the birth pangs of the State of Israel.
From 1820 through 1924, an unending flow of Jews made their way to America from Europe, ending in a massive surge of immigrants in the early 1900’s. My mother and father were among them, driven by economic hardship, persecution, and the huge political upheavals of the 19th century.
Millions of European Jews left their towns and villages and embarked on the arduous journey to the goldene medina of America (and Canada), where Jewish genius flourished. It is fascinating that a similar massive wave of emigration – a million Russian Jews who emigrated to Israel – fueled the growth of Israel’s hi-tech industry, from 1990 to 2000.
After you read this book, it comes as no surprise that two Jews, Bourla and Zaks, are spearheading two COVID-19 vaccines to which many may one day soon owe their lives.

I interviewed Lebrecht by email. Here are his responses to my questions.
You are widely known for writing about music. How did you come to write about how Jews in general changed the world? Was it perhaps because of your book about the Jewish composer Gustav Mahler? Mahler was Jewish, but very remote from Judaism.
I have written two books about Mahler, in 1987 and 2010. In both, I dealt with specifically Jewish aspects of his life and work that had not been treated before. Judaism was integral to Mahler. His conversion to Christianity did not inhibit Judaism’s influence on his life and music in ways too numerous to describe here.
But that is not the reason I wrote Genius and Anxiety. The anomaly that Jews, constituting a fraction of one percent of world population, should be responsible for almost half the breakthroughs in society, arts and the sciences between the middle of the 19th and 20th centuries, was a question that had preoccupied me for half my adult life. I had to try to explain it.” [There were about 3 million Jews in 1847, out of a world population of 1.2 billion – or 0.25%].
THERE IS an interesting theory about the origins of extraordinary Jewish achievement, by Maristella Botticini and Zvi Eckstein, The Chosen Few: How Education Shaped Jewish History, 70-1492. [See “The Chosen Few”, the Report, Septemer 9 2013]. They write: “The destruction of the Second Temple in 70 C.E. transformed Judaism from a cult based on ritual sacrifices to a religion whose main norm required every Jewish man to read and study the Torah in Hebrew and to send his sons to school or synagogue to learn to do so. The unifying force of the Temple was replaced by the unifying force of Torah. But this meant every Jew had to be literate, to know the Torah. As a result, Jews were literate when others were not. This gave Jews a comparative advantage in the burgeoning commercial economy, in “crafts, trade, commerce, moneylending, banking, finance and medicine”. A voluntary diaspora occurred when Jews dispersed in search of worldwide opportunities.” Jews simply got a big head start.
So, what is the Lebrecht explanation?
I am concerned here only with this specific period, 1847-1947, which was also the period of greatest creativity in human history. Why the Jews played such a large role is rooted in a collective cultural unconscious – a common way of thinking – allied to a constant fear of disruption, as I explain in the book.
When anyone writes about how a specific religious and cultural “tribe” excels, there are cries of racism. Have you faced such criticism? If so, how do you respond?
On the contrary, reviews of the UK and US editions by non-Jews have been very positive, some with an air of near-astonishment, indicating that previous historians had not connected the dots between the vast number of Jews who were active in the period. There is nothing racist in stating that Jews have been awarded one-fifth of the Nobel prizes in science. That’s a fact. What lies behind that phenomenon is what prompted me to write the book.
The only criticism I have faced on this score has been from some Israeli interviewers who wanted to know why I regard Jews who converted as remaining part of the Jewish cultural unconscious.
LEBRECH RECOUNDS the genius of such well-known figures as Marx, Freud, Einstein and Kafka. But there are great many other Jewish geniuses in his book, far less well-known. Among them: Karl Landsteiner, whose research enabled physicians to transfuse blood without endangering patients’ lives; Paul Erlich, pioneer of chemotherapy, who found a cure for syphilis; Magnus Hershfield, among the earliest advocates for homosexual and transgender rights; and my favorite, Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray diffraction images of DNA at King’s College, London, led Crick and Watson to their pathbreaking discovery of the DNA double helix. Franklin was only 37 when she died of ovarian cancer; the many X-rays she absorbed in her lab may have been a factor. Had she lived, she should surely have shared the DNA Nobel.
I can’t resist giving a plug to the Jewish mother theory of genius, by the legendary Israeli entrepreneur and angel investor Yossi Vardi. Jewish mothers push their children to aspire to greatness and to genius, he explains.
They do, indeed; I had one. But I fell short. My son is a doctor, my mother would say – but not the kind that helps people.
Isadore Rabi, son of Russian émigrés, credited his mom with his Nobel Prize in physics. When he used to come home from school, she did not ask him what he learned that day, but rather asked, “what good questions did you ask in school today, Isadore?” Later, Rabi’s good questions helped led him to discover nuclear magnetic resonance – the foundation of today’s lifesaving MRI imaging devices.
The Talmud is full of argumentative Rabbis with good questions – and we Jews have been arguing and imitating them for at least two thousand years.
Lebrecht explains in his book that if Jews excel in various professions, their excellence is in general a result of culture, not DNA. Bitter experience has taught Jews to think differently from others and maybe to think more deeply than others. He observes that Mahler used to say, Jews are like swimmers with short arms, they must invest twice as much effort to reach safe shores. And anxiety, Lebrecht writes, impacts Jews just as the tax collectors did in Egypt – it spurs them to acts of genius.

[Like this “act of genius” I suppose?

Meanwhile, as you watch and listen, ask yourself how many times you have heard of PROSECUTORS recommending no jail sentence. Also ask yourself the question: “How much of a coincidence is it that this same rabbi gets shot in a “anti semitic attack” on his specific synagogue”? He then, gets zero jail time while the others he ratted on, get 10 years or more. Don’t you smell one god almighty HUGE rat?]

More than a few of those in the book, Lebrecht notes, fit this elusive category – men and women who find the strength, in a time of crisis, to forge new paths in superhuman ways, with incredible genius for action and invention. Some are born geniuses; others, he notes, have genius thrust upon them at a certain point in their lives.
Is that, in fact, the story of the two “Jewish” vaccines?

The writer heads the Zvi Griliches Research Data Center at S. Neaman Institute, Technion and blogs at http://www.timnovate.wordpress.com
Genius & Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World, 1847-1947
Norman Lebrecht
Simon and Schuster, 2019
432 pages, Amazon $25.95
Hebrew edition: Kinneret, Zmora, Dvir: Modi-in, 2020, 511 pages

How many deaths and other adverse reactions due to their “miracle vaccines” which are entirely noneffective?

This might give you a summary: https://www.goyimtv.tv/view?v=1313872600