NICE: Einat Wilf tells you what it’s all about in her own words.
“Israel is right now at war. It is a war in which the weapons are not tanks, airplanes, or missiles, but words, images, and ideas. Defenders of Israel must understand the kind of ideological war they are fighting before they can prepare a plan for victory. In this lecture, Dr. Wilf discusses how Israel can fight and win the battle of the mind.”
And who created the words and images (of which she speaks) of NICE and Munich? Her husband, the “journalist”, and his daughter, Thamina Stoll (another “journalist and student at Duke University studying political science).
As you listen to this, read between the lines AND ensure you understand that she is projecting her words “truth and facts” on “the enemy” – i.e. you and I. She is the one who is willing to use the lies and the manipulation.
If you allow people like me (and, perhaps, yourself or anyone else) to be “shut down” for using OUR words in this war, then they win and we/you lose.
By the way, who’d you guess as the “student” she spoke to re writing the PhD paper? Thamina by chance? 😉
Oh! And if you’d never heard of Thamina, then let me introduce you to Richard Gutjahr’s 22 year old daughter that very few of the mainstream media articles regarding the Munich attack even referred to as Gutjahr’s daughter, nevermind say “What an amazing coincidence Thamina with your father just having taken footage of the Nice attack a week or so ago.”:
And BOY didn’t she panic for a few seconds at the beginning of this interview? Meanwhile, the interviewer either hasn’t got a clue who her father is (doubtful) or is told not to even go there (like in so many other interviews both filmed and in print.
“Words and images” people. That’s the “war” Wilf speaks of.
NOW, listen to this one because, in my opinion, the guy who comes on at 2.37 to talk to her, throws in a little grenade and he knows he is. He’s purposefully giving a heads up. He purposefully brings up the point “Oh no, not again!” to check her reaction and she MUST then mention her father (but without naming him you may notice). You then hear her stutter and think and stutter and try to figure out how to answer this…..
Now, here’s a Daily Mail article on her and Munich:
Not a word about her father. She’s just some American student who originates from Munich and was with her family and Gran. Poor little dear. What a shock for her eh?
And here is ABC:
There are 101 different articles and videos about Thamina and her family without mentioning who her dad is. Quite incredible really. And you call mainstream media people “journalists”? You’re having a laugh!
Meanwhile, the media don’t then interview her dad – you’d think they would considering just what had gone down in Nice but no, they would not wish to have the vast majority of people (who don’t read outside the mainstream if they read at all and just watch BBC. ITV. ABC etc etc) pick up on the fact it’s father and daughter (with a Knesset, Zionist, “ex” Lieutenant” of the IDF Intelligence services, mother) who took these videos and images. Attempting, desperately, to keep the two apart as separate events with entirely separate people behind the cameras.
And here she is with Daddy (by the way, I mention 22 years old above – I have seen articles where she is 18 and where she is 22) however, in this article (referred by Wikipedia), his “eldest daughter” is 21: “Whether Gutjahr would still recommend his children today, to become a journalist, Sandra Strüwing asked. The answer was slow in coming: “um ….”. In Gutjahrs eldest daughter, 21, it is already too late.” The strange thing is that Wikipedia itself states that he only has one son and one daughter: Gutjahr is the former Israeli since 2007 Knesset -Abgeordneten Einat Wilf married. [26 ] Gutjahr has a son (* 2010) and a daughter (* 1994). Perhaps lost in translation? 🙂
And here she is following Daddy on her Facebook page (while following both, the CEO and COO of Facebook – both jews):
And how about this one. While her father (and mother) get invited to the British House of Commons, Thamina, in the USA, gets her photo taken with the possible next President of the United States:
What a lucky little nonentity of a student eh?
And daddy at the House of Commons:
As for what happened to the victims…. well, let’s put it this way, as soon as I seen the footage of the alleged shooter outside McDonald’s and the group of kids all running past him from around a corner, I said “They’ve been hanging around waiting for directions”. These kids were plants. Furthermore, you see an old guy walking toward the “shooter” and he seems to have no idea what’s going on and is caught up in it. His face (only his) is even blanked out in some video footage of it and in most images. I don’t think he was meant to be there.
Back to the “victims” – most of them were Kosovan or Turkish. “Here’s a few Euros, off you go and spend it well”.
“And shhh… don’t say a word!”
And that, my friends, is Einat Wolf’s “War of words and images”, kindly brought to you by the “Wilf” family.
Richard wonders how Journalists are going to make a living in this new age of internet, twitter and blogs. He knows damned well I assure you. It’s called DECEPTIVE PROPAGANDA MOSSAD, CIA, MI5, MI6, DVD style.
Oh and one last thing (which makes me laugh):
“Respect” 🙂 Well, unless you share controlled pics of the victims on ITV as above for example.
After all, the authorities don’t want too many pics of the victims floating around. Someone might recognise them in a McDonald’s one day!
That’s also why so many of these “shooters” end up “dead”.
Nice: The jewish connection
So, we heard about the german, Richard Gutjahr – married to Einat Wilf an Israeli jew, Knesset MP and “ex” Lieutenant in the Intelligence corp within the IDF – who just so happened to have been right place (on his balcony) at the right time (literally seconds before the truck went on its rampage) in the previous blogpost. How “lucky” is that? That they weren’t in the crowd that night BUT Richard had the presence of mind to just start filming a truck at precisely the right time.
Richard and Einat have a son it would appear but, from the look of Richard, sorry, but I have to say I’m surprised. He looks like he should be fronting and LGBT group – but I digress.
So, this is the first couple of ATHEISTS (which they say themselves, they are “devout” about). It’s strange, then, when you read SO MANY TIMES of these jewish atheists (Einat) and their spouses who are also “very supportive” of one particular religion: Judaism. Even, in this case, a German atheist spouse! Why would an atheist (if that is what you are) have any singular interest in a religion? Unless, of course, they consider jews as a race – something the jews, generally, love to use when it suits and drop when it suits.
Here’s an interview with Einat Wilf:
Anyhow, they made a good choice of being in NICE together didn’t they? Oh yes they did! 😉
Now, here’s the next point and it’s a BIGGIE:
The UK’s Daily Telegraph reported as follows (and not too many people seem to have picked up on it – as usual) –
A JEWISH FATHER HAS A “PREMONITION” – these jews get their word from G-d you know (or they have Crystal balls if they’re atheists of course)
HOW DID YOU DO THAT, HAVE YOU GOT POWERS, HOW DID YOU KNOW?
Well, even his own son asks it BUT the zionist controlled media haven’t bothered to EVEN THOUGH they quote him on it. Odd don’t you think? 🙂
Not at all!
You see, once you READ (remember books and stuff and a requirement for more than an 8 second attention span?), you begin to see/recognise a big picture which is repeated and repeated time and again. I want to introduce you to a paper written many years ago by the American Think Tank, The CATO Institute. The paper is called “The Green Peril” and explains they creation of a new “bogeyman” to replace the “Red Menace” at the end of the Cold War. You see, the global establishment needs your belief in these menaces and perils to keep you in fear. Fear rules. Fear makes you lash out at created (by them) events which make you plead with your “betters”, your “leaders”, the “government” for protection. How do they protect? By taking away basic freedoms; by clamping down on free speech; by shutting down portions of the internet (and the time will likely come for this blog and many like it). You see, to give you these connections and to show you what we do, is called “hate speech”. You can shut hate speech down in a nanosecond if those who, still in fear, demand it. You just don’t get it though do you? As you give them the power to do this, they take it step by step and, one day, you’ll be shut down. I know tons of people who are scared today to speak their mind. Some of these people have been high up in her majesty’s Armed Forces. But, by all means, you keep demanding “protection” but don’t you think they aren’t doing a very good job of it? I can’t help but laugh at you cretins. Cretins are those of you who believe in statism – the Jeremy Corbyn believers and the Donald Trump believers. Those of you who always fall into the trap of being told by such people what you want to hear.
Anyhow, here’s the paper:
By Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post no less. (It gets funnier and funnier). And notice the year: 1992. So, another “crystal ball” from a jew a long time before the world even sensed such a threat. Why? Because it didn’t exist until they wanted it to.
http://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/green-peril-creating-islamic-fundamentalist-threat
Excerpts:
Indeed, like the Red Menace of the Cold War era, the Green Peril is perceived as a cancer spreading around the globe, undermining the legitimacy of Western values and political systems. The cosmic importance of the confrontation would make it necessary for Washington to adopt a longterm diplomatic and military strategy; to forge new and solid alliances; to prepare the American people for a neverending struggle that will test their resolve; and to develop new containment policies, new doctrines, and a new foreign policy elite with its “wise men” and “experts.”
Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain. “It’s big; it’s scary; it’s anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and discontent,” wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam “spreads across vast swaths of the globe that can be colored green on the television maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red.”
The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious “sources” and unnamed officials who leak information, float trial balloons, and warn about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions taking place within government. Their information is then augmented by colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorial terrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named and other villains. The media end up finding corroboration from foreign sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S. government and help the press uncover further information substantiating the threat coming from the new bad guys.
Anyhow, there is a lot more so read the damned thing and enlighten yourselves. Otherwise, you’re just going to be another twat swallowing the crap from the BBC or CNN etc. There’s tons of such assholes – they’re called “normal” and think nothing of their country bombing the shit out of innocent human beings.
But behind it all is a jewish influence that needs to vilify Islam and the everyday jew supports it with their silence as do christians with their ignorance and as do muslims, believe it or not, with their silence and fear of being considered an “extremist”.
That said, what keeps it ALL going (even those who are controlling it) is ALL of us with our petty prejudices, racism, greed, ignorance and fear.
“THEY” love it!
Bastille Day in Yiddish
Ok, it’s been a LONG time since I proverbially, put pen to paper but this is just too much to ignore.
It’s short but it’s “sweet”.
The other day, when it happened, I made the following comments somewhere:
This guy seems to be the only one with footage of this truck. This means the media would have to have gotten access to it and to use it from the guy (or woman) who took the footage. Just ONE guy has any (what may or may not be called) decent footage of this truck seemingly “rampaging” through the street.
Wasn’t that lucky of the media that they got hold of this one piece of footage? (The other footage from the crowd for all of about 1 or 2 seconds was hardly useful). This footage has now been shown all across the world probably millions and millions of times. If YOU had taken this footage, what would you have done?
And, again, note how he/she tracks the truck with the camera.
Now, it was not the above video exactly, from RT, which I was commenting on because it didn’t have the name of the videographer added as you can see in the RT footage.
Someone commented to my comments:Â “I’d make a fortune and never work again.”
To which I replied: “Exactly!” (Media outlets would pay a small ransom for such footage if the only footage available – and it seems to be more or less)
I added: “Why don’t people get wise to all of this man? WHY isn’t it all bloody obvious? WHY don’t they pick up stuff that stares them in the face?
NOW, however, we have the guy’s name – Richard Gutjahr. Richard is a German. HOWEVER, he just so happens to be married to a woman by the name of Einat Wilf.
Who is Einat Wilf?
Son of a BITCH!
Remember I was saying how it was odd that the cameraman/woman (whoever it was) seemed to be focusing and tracking the truck just as it came into view?
Well here’s the guy who took the footage.
Now, the BIG thing is that he is married to Einat Wilf – an Israeli Knesset member AND reported to be MOSSAD Intelligence Agent.
COME ON folks! Get the bloody wax out your ears and the sunglasses off!
These people are ALWAYS in the thick of it! That footage (just like so many others) was taken by just the “right” kind of guy! HOW IGNORANT ARE YOU WILLING TO REMAIN? How much do you really believe in “Coincidence Theory?
Attack witness Richard Gutjahr speaks to DW
http://www.dw.com/en/attack-witness-richard-gutjahr-speaks-to-dw/av-19401774
When you listen to the interview in the above link, listen very closely because there are elements of this guy’s testimony which are VERY telling. Two things in particular:
- He states that there were fireworks which finished just before the truck turned up but it would appear that he did not take any footage of these even though he had his camera at the ready. He says he did not start any filming until he saw the truck. So, here is a guy who just, luckily, was at the window or on the balcony of his hotel at just the right moment in time to then decide to switch on his camera to take footage of a truck? So, as soon as a truck comes into his field of view he says to himself “That’s odd, I must film this”? He doesn’t film fireworks or any of the other goings on. Also, he just so happens to be on his balcony with a perfect view rather than being down amongst the crowd. Perhaps his Knesset MP, jewish wife is paranoid about crowds and trucks? Further, as he says, “it all happened in a space of 60 seconds”. 60 seconds out of a whole night and he’s there, with his camera at the ready. If it was his phone camera, he’d have to pick it up or retrieve it from his pocket, switch it on to camera setting and start filming. Let’s say that takes even 10 seconds. That means he must have noticed the truck even further back from where he starts filming. Why would he think anything of it to consider it required filming given all the other activity of the night – the good stuff? No. It is very apparent this guy was primed to take this footage. No doubt about it.
- The interviewer asks a really odd question: “How did you escape?” Escape what? Notice he doesn’t say that however. He goes into some long ramble about being held in the hotel and then goes on to talk about taking pics of police and peace signs etc. But why on earth did this interviewer ask him how he “escaped”? Obviously, he was nowhere bloody near the truck because he was up in his hotel room taking the footage!
But, generally, just listen to this interview. It is packed with the same old verbiage and diarrhoea.
And here’s the wife…
Einat Wilf (Hebrew: ×¢×™× ×ª וילף‎‎, born 11 December 1970) is an Israeli politician who served as a member of the Knesset for Independence and the Labor Party.
Einat Wilf was born in Jerusalem. She studied at the Hebrew University Secondary School. During her national service in the Israel Defense Forces she was an Intelligence Officer in Unit 8200, and reached the rank of lieutenant. She then went to Harvard University, receiving a BA in government and fine arts, before being awarded an MBA by INSEAD in France, and subsequently a PhD in political science at Wolfson College, University of Cambridge.
Wilf is married to German journalist and television personality Richard Gutjahr. She gave birth to their son in 2010.
Wilf describes herself as a Zionist and an atheist.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einat_Wilf
And here is a very interesting quote from Einat Wilf:
“There is no such thing as ‘fighting fair’ in this war of words and images.”
From “Winning the media war”.
Now, do you remember a group of Israelis after 9/11 who were allowed to return to Israel, said they were claimed to be Mossad and also stated they had been in New York City to “document the event”?
No?
Here’s a reminder:
Now, for god’s sakes people, wake the hell up!
This is getting serious and no number of candles, vigils and little french flags on your Facebook profiles is going to help. Only knowledge of who and what is behind all of this is going to help. I don’t go looking for this stuff but time and time again, Israeli/jews happen to be right in the thick of it and that footage was deliberate!Â
Two movies due/jew for release which were canned because of two terrorist attacks around their release dates. HOW MUCH “COINCIDENCE” CAN YOU TAKE?
A young con artist and former CIA agent embark on an anti-terrorist mission in France.
Studiocanal Asks French Theaters to Pull ‘Bastille Day’ Movie in Wake of Nice Attack (EXCLUSIVE)
A freelance journalist (Malik Zidi) investigates the growing phenomenon of disaffected youth joining Islamic extremist groups. He infiltrates a group of four young jihadis whose mission is to destabilize the city center of Paris.
Here’s another couple of simple common sense issues to work your mind around. By all means ignore them or, alternatively, come up with some logical explanation and I’m VERY happy to listen.
- Many people have already questioned the fact the truck had no blood on it. Indeed, such a thought is ridiculous but, certainly, if you think otherwise then go ahead.Â
- Have a good think about this photo. We see a heap of people, just mowed over by a truck which sped up, we’re told, and ploughs through them, perhaps knocking a few to the side but these ones are all lying there in the middle of the road. What do you notice (or not in fact)?
Blood! There is not a hint of blood spattering anywhere on that road around a whole group of people having been hit by this truck. Not only that but, if these people were hit and then run across by the truck (which would have to be the case) there would be dismembered bodies cut in half and the rest. There isn’t. All the bodies appear completely intact. This just simply does not compute.
“By way of deception, thou shalt do war”
Earthling 
1 comment