Earthlinggb's Blog

EPSTEIN’S DEAD MAN’S SWITCH

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, Paedophilia, Politics, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on August 16, 2019

I just can’t fathom these naysayers who continue to dismiss the possibility Epstein is alive and drone on and on about “Was it a suicide or was it a murder?” without giving a moment’s consideration to the third option. It makes you wonder how many alternative news sources are simply gatekeepers. I believe a lot!

That was not Epstein on that Gurney and here’s a simple and totally plausible reason why Epstein WOULD have a “dead Man’s Switch” and an ability to use it. If you don’t think he is totally hooked in to Israel and their Intelligence services while Israel continues to want control over the US congress and Senate (while it isn’t “Israel” on its own by the way, it is those who control/own Israel), then you’re just not willing to think.

From Virginia (Roberts) Guiffre’s 2015 sworn affidavit:

So not only “leniency” but even more: ESCAPE TROUBLE ALTOGETHER.

And why? Because all of that information on them still exists and the man wasn’t stupid!

“YOU PUT ME AWAY OR YOU ATTEMPT TO TAKE MY LIFE AND ALL OF THIS IS DUMPED FOR THE WORLD TO SEE”

And Netanyahu, Israel, the Rothschilds – perhaps even the Royal Family and the Vatican: All of them very happy to let the man live out the rest of his life quietly and, in the eyes of the public and the victims, “dead”. It then all disappears into the past like Jimmy Savile.

There is no honour among thieves BUT, just like the mafia families, they stick together when they, as a whole, are under threat – and they are.

Just found this today, Sunday 18th August. I concur with every word.

Just another Jewish administration

Posted in Geo-Political Warfare, Gross stupidity within society, Media, Politics by earthling on April 8, 2019

JUST ANOTHER JEWISH ADMINISTRATION

But then, I think I mentioned that while America was celebrating at their “non-controlled new President”.

They swing from Democrat to Republican but never figure it out – just like here in the UK.

But the “Boys” at the top keep swinging and the “boys” always work it out while Americans keep sleeping.

But America still thinks “Heaven loves ya” if you keep protecting the jews and Israel. Such a cuckolded nation with a cuckolded Armed Forces. Keep doing what you’re told America. Keep fighting the British-Israel wars!

 

 

KEEP LISTENING TO YOUR MAINSTREAM GARBAGE AND LET THEM DESTROY THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INTERNET (WHILE YOUR PRESIDENT HELPS THEM).

AFTER ALL, SANDY HOOK WAS A REAL EVENT RIGHT? LOL

JUST LIKE CHRISTCHURCH!

 

STILL NOT CLEAR ENOUGH HUH?

WHAT IS THE AVERAGE IQ IN THE USA?

Bush passed it on to Obama and Obama passed the baton to Trump while the real power lurks behind washing their sweaty little hands with their hand sanitiser.

And they wash their hands, not to keep their hands clean. More likely, they’re washing their hands of the shit they keep delivering on the rest of the world.

If the blind guide the blind, both will fall into the pit!

And BOY, are the jews guiding you!

Say after me…. 1, 2, 3:Oh, say can you see by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at……….. Oh forget it!

Try this one you idiots:

Alternatively, try these two because it won’t be too long until you’re singing one of them. In fact, while you’re singing your “Star Spangled Banner”, the nations of Israel and Britain are smirking quietly knowing who really owns you!

Donald Trump: Leader of the free world indeed! Hilarious!

It really is!

 

#GDL

Earth’s gravity to fund President Trump’s wall!

Posted in Money, Politics, Science, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on September 24, 2017

Isaac Newton was a smart bloke but I’d bet he’d never, in a million years, think that his calculations wrt gravity would fund a border wall between the United States and Mexico.

I know, you can’t fathom it either (and neither could I until I thought about it). So here goes: After all, we all know the CIA, working for the deep state, does a lot of the importation of cocaine etc – just ask Bill and Hillary Clinton! After all, it was in Mena, Arkansas, while Bill was Governor, that a lot of the shit came in to airfields by CIA propellor craft. Or didn’t you know that?

So, with this in mind and the ongoing battle between Trump and Enrique Peña Nieto regarding who’s going to pay, a source close to Trump has leaked that the two corrupt Presidential bastards are finalizing an arrangement between them based on Earth’s gravity, latitude difference between Mexico City and Washington D.C and the price of cocaine.

Let me explain (bear in mind this is explosive yet very hushed up information. If the FBI and CIA knew I knew this, I’d be suicided ;-)):

The earth’s gravity is said to vary between poles along the lines of latitude on the globe. For some reason, in international trade, this difference is never taken into account when weighing goods transported from one region of the globe to another – odd when you really think about it.

Now, weight = mass x gravity. We all know that right? Well, it appears Enrique gave Donald a call and said “I’ll be happy to fund the wall for you if we can come to an arrangement regarding the price and weight of cocaine in the US market”. Donald was confused but Jared, his son in law, was all ears. He was confused too but, being jewish, he’ll listen to any old shite to make a buck. Except this wasn’t shite – it was coke! I suppose the same could apply to the export of manure but manure doesn’t exactly hold the same price tag as coke. You could wait until the cows come home for a manure deal to have the same impact (yes, thrown in deliberately as a pun!).

“The wall that President Trump has vowed to build along the U.S. border with Mexico could cost more than $21 billion, nearly twice the amount of previous estimates, according to an internal Homeland Security Department report that was obtained by Reuters.10 Feb 2017”

Enrique went on to explain that, while the coke being weighed in Mexico was a given and exact amount of kilograms, when weighed in Washington D.C., due to the local gravity effect, it would, effectively, weigh more so the US consumer was making on the deal quite significantly when one considered the tonnage that was transported over the border in a year. “Come on Senor Donald” said Nieto, “you amd I both know it’s a win win situation”. “No…eh…no…no I don’t. Jared, are you getting this?”. “Let him continue Donald…” said Jared while Ivanka lay on the sofa in the Oval office, filing her nails thinking “Thank God Jared’s a jew and not a muslim otherwise it wouldn’t be him with the male mutilated genitalia!” and reading her latest edition of Tatler.

“Ok…ok….I’m sending you a link by email. Have a look…” Enrique exclaimed somewhat exasperated. “Send it to my personal email server….. eh, no….I’m not a Clinton. Oh bugger! Send it to the Oval office fax machine…. no, no, you can’t do that either! Shit! Shit! Ummm…. Ah! Send it to my daughter’s email” replied Trump.

“What’s your daughter’s email?” asked Nieto.

“daddysprincessiskosher@yahoo.com”

“Ok. It’s on its way……. Got it?”

“Yup! Got it!”

I’ve been sent a copy of the document sent to Trump:

“Now Senor Donald…”, Nieto continued, “All the Cocaine which ends up in the United States makes its way through Mehico. You know that, I know that, everybody knows that. The people who control your CIA know that and are happy to continue that. I am also happy to continue it and I will ensure that the cartels are well regulated and the Mehican government makes a good profit from it. However, there is a disparity at the moment between how much we are making and how much we could be making and it is all due to that English bloke with the jewish first name (can’t say “christian name” can we when it’s obviously jewish), Isaac Newton. You see, in Mexico City, when we weigh the amount transported, due to local gravity conditions, us being nearer the equator, our value for the weight is different from yours. 1Kg of cocaine (mass) multiplied by our local gravity figure of 9.7791m/s2 is 9.7791N, whereas, weighed in Washington, with a local gravity of 9.8007m/s2, it is 9.8007N. You’re gaining 0.0216N of weight on every Kg!”

Local Gravity: Mexico City

Local Gravity: Washington D.C.

 

“You’ve lost me!” blurted Trump.

“Jared… at, let’s say, 100 tonnes of product streaming over your border every year – and that is a conservative figure and, being conservatives yourselves, you may appreciate this. 100 tonnes is 100 x 1000Kg = 100,000Kg. The price of 1gram of coke in the US is approximately $150. Now, take 0.0216N (or Kg) and multiply by 100,000 and you get 2160N or 2160Kg additional weight you’re presently receiving for nothing. That 2160Kg is 2,160,000 grams of coke at $150 per gram which is US$324,000,000. However, a fair estimate of the tonnage flowing into the U.S. per year is about 500 tonnes but let’s say 300 for the sake of argument. That’s just under US$1Billion per year we’re losing out on supplying your people’s demand for cocaine every single year. So here’s the deal: You guarantee me that you’ll increase the price on the streets of Washington and all over the U.S. to make up that shortfall so that your side maintains its profit while I increase the kickbacks to the Mehican government to the same value. I’ll then use that increased revenue to fund your wall, assuming a 25 year agreement – discretely of course and everyone’s happy. Well. except the coke sniffers across the States. Just another hidden tax though Senor Donald eh?”

“Brilliant…brilliant…. ahh well it sounds brilliant…Jared? What do you think?”

“It is brilliant Donald and I know just the guys who can ensure the price on the street meets Senor Mieto’s needs”.

“Ahhh Jared. When Ivanka told me you were her guy, I knew it. I knew she was a smart cookie. Owner of 666 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan and shagging my daughter PLUS, a jew. What more could I want?”

“That’s right Donald. Shalom Daddio!”

“So gentlemen…” continued President Nieto, “Let’s call it a ‘Trade deal under the cloak of National Security’, do we have a deal?”

Presidential Address by President Donald J Trump:

“To the people of this great nation of ours, under God, I want to tell you, President Nieto of Mexico and I are great friends… really GREAT friends… and the President has graciously agreed to fund the wall between our great nations because we are great nations and we not only are great friends but respect each other greatly and that is why we need to build this great wall. It will be a stupendous wall, a wall to out-wall any other wall, even Pink Floyd’s – great band by the way, even greater when Waters left… great great band and they had a great wall too. Even China…China has a great wall and so does Israel but OUR wall will be the greatest. So great, they say China’s can be seen from Earth orbit; Ours will be seen from Proxima Centauri it will be so so great!”

“Dear God! I told him not to say we’d pay! What the hell do I tell MY people now? exclaimed Nieto to Kushner.

“Don’t worry Senor President, just tell them he’s mad. They’ll believe you. The whole world will.”

How cocaine enters America
The simplest way to transport a drug is also the best for cocaine producers. Hundreds of tons of cocaine are packaged and put on trucks to make the long journey up through South and Central America and into Mexico. Along the way, drugs and money can change hands many times as the drugs are shipped northward by criminal cartels.

http://www.cocaineaddiction.com/much-cocaine-brought-us.html

“The price of cocaine in the United States has hardly moved,” Wainwright said. “In the past couple of decades it’s been about $150 per pure gram, and that’s barely budged, so there’s a puzzle there.”

http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-much-does-cocaine-cost-in-the-us-2016-10

 

The establishment would like to thank the following for their contribution to maintaining us:

Coke heads and other such addicts.

Thank you!

 

Fake News

Posted in Media, Politics by earthling on September 7, 2017

First of all, RIP Ernst Zundel. And that is not said lightly because, today, if ever anyone was to ask me who some of my “heroes” are (although, generally, I don’t have any anymore), Herr Zundel would definitely be one of them. What this man endured for the sake of honesty, truth and for the right to express his own opinion, was monstrous. However, “monstrous” is the right word for the people he was up against. People who, amongst other things, arsoned the man’s home and walked away scot free because nobody even bothered to look for them. Why? Because they are the “chosen race” – they get a “pass” for everything and anything they say or do just about.

So, on to the topic – and it’s a short one.

Donald Trump and “Fake News”. Where did all this “Fake News” business come from? Was it just something made up in Donald’s head? No, I doubt that because both sides of the political spectrum are using it to attack the other side’s supportive media outlets. “Fake News” has become a weapon of sorts. So where did it originate – the idea of referring to “fake news” that is. Well, I was watching a video regarding the late Ernst Zundel just yesterday and the oddest thing in what he said, during this interview with Jim Fetzer, just jumped out at me. I’ve captured the segment here. Have a listen:

Now, while I’m not saying, for definite, that this is where the idea, within the establishment, came from for the label of “Fake News”, I will say I’m pretty damned certain of it. “They” (both sides and particularly the “Pharisee types”) want a way of legislating to shut down what THEY suggest is “fake news” sites, youtube videos and the rest (including what would be this blog and a myriad of others with a far greater reach than mine). As Zundel says, it was/is a law from 1275 when the King of England wanted to stamp out any and all criticism of him. Well, today, it is just, now, the establishment and “pharisees” who wish to achieve that and what better way of doing it than using this old law as a basis. Of course, they will never refer to this law as being the catalyst for it but, nevertheless, I am convinced this is where the label and idea of being able to shut down “fake news” has come from. It’s been on my mind for a while as to where this “fake news” label appeared from and how – I am positive this is my answer.

The following is from the site MLDI who provide legal defence to journalists, bloggers and independent media, worldwide. [One must bear in mind, once more, however that, as lawyers, they are members of the Bar Association – please make sure and remember and appreciate what this means and the limitations within which they can possibly defend anyone – you do understand this don’t you?]

Americans please note because, while you cheer Donald Trump and his accusations of “Fake News” against CNN and others, you don’t have a damned clue regarding what you are actually supporting and what is lurking very quietly behind it. You are so damned quick (and gullible) to believe that “This President is different” – it amazes me. So many thought Obama would be because he was “black”. He was GIVEN to you! Donald Trump is GIVEN to you! They ALL are “Establishment” whether you wish to believe it or not. They may just be more your “colour” of establishment. What better way to have people “invest” their belief in one of their chosen people than to have you believe they are despised? It’s simply the use of reverse psychology and you are falling for it hook, line and sinker!

So, please read carefully and note “and to prevent the population from rising up in rebellion”. This is what your “fake news” is all about. No more, no less. Yes, you can say (and you are right to) that CNN, BBC, Fox etc etc have significant volume of fake news in them BUT they are the establishment’s fake news and that, my dear friends, is A-OK. Yes yes, Trump is attacking CNN… and?….So? Do you honestly think CNN is going to go out of business because of this? If they were to, don’t you think it would be controlled? Again, Trump firing at them is to give you the impression he’s on your side. Did he incarcerate Hillary? Anyhow, I digress (although it’s a valid and important digression).

 

http://www.mediadefence.org/news/explaining-issues-false-news

It seems that, if you want freedom of speech these days, it can be had in places like Uganda and Zimbabwe! How about that? But the United States and the United Kingdom? Well, just ask Ernst Zundel! Granted he was in Canada but what the hell.

Here’s another thing – Jacob Rees-Mogg I see is getting a lot of attention and supporters these days. I listened to this yesterday too. Hear him regarding freedom of expression and the right to open debate (on anything).

Damn! Damn! and Double Damn! The BBC has had it removed from youtube on Copyright grounds! Well, let me explain. He said, essentially, that it is his belief that any and all opinions should be allowed about any subject whatsoever to ensure we retain absolute freedom of expression in this country. I happened to comment on the now deleted youtube comment section that I believed him to be a hypocrite because I doubted whether this “freedom” would stretch to opinion on the holocaust. Interesting that the video was actually posted by the Jacob Rees-Mogg channel itself. Wouldn’t he have known it would be removed on copyright grounds (being a legislator and all that, you know?). Please note the man’s “christian” name (and yes, he’s a catholic but is he a JESUIT catholic? ;-)) – JACOB!

From his Wikipedia page: “After leaving Oxford Rees-Mogg worked for the Rothschild investment bank before moving to Hong Kong…”.

It amazes me, once more, that British people (like Americans) can be so gullible and “sucked in” to believing that these sorts of people actually speak for them. Rees-Mogg is a monster like the rest of them. Just read his Wikipedia page and think on it. Trump, Rees-Mogg, even Nigel Farage and the like are INCUBATED and then,when the right time comes along, they are “fed” to the populace and their “stances” on various topics are “spun” to make it LOOK as if they are in tune with your beliefs. They are NOT!

Anyway, I’ve said my peace. I’ve been at this blog since 2010. There was a time (and I think many bloggers are similar) that I had the time and inclination and fervent passion to write about all of this over so many subjects and, when I was in that “zone”, I’d pump out regular blogs and my readership was of the order of about 1000/day. The thing is, I’ve said really all I have to say. All of the false flags and news that comes out day after day in our media is just more of the same and we can analyse it for all it’s worth but… BUT…. it’s all the same. The same old shit and people either wake up to it or they don’t. The fundamental issue in this world is the money system and debt interest coupled with a legal system and “legal personality” that people STILL don’t understand or wish to. I’ve blogged about all of that and explained everything in as clearest of terms I can but, these days, I don’t have the time or inclination to just keep pumping out blogs on every subject and every false flag or false premise and attempt to expose shit for what it is. Frankly, it’s boring to me now and if the human race wishes to remain stupid, then so be it. These recent blogs of mine, over the past year or two, have been nothing in comparison to the time and effort I put into my major blogs a few years ago and which hardly get read. Today, I’m down to about 50 readers per day. I never looked for readership for the purpose of being  a “renowned blogger” in this space. The purpose of this blog was to educate and to highlight the issues. I look at the like of Infowars and think “There you go! People are still gullible enough to get led by the tail by a fat bastard who sells potions and “spun truth” mixed with bullshit.”

Serious pieces delving into money, the legal system and archival material to fully support it, is just not “sexy” enough and doesn’t give people that feeling of being part of a “gang” like “BLM” or “White supremacy” or even “Libertarian” and “Liberal” and Conservative”… or “anarchist” for that matter. People don’t want to understand and recognise solutions and the real issues. People want “leaders”. They always have and always will.

So fuck it. I have a personal life and in that personal life, I’m on to something big so, while I may still throw the odd thing out there that tickles my interest, I’d say “Appreciate all those guys (and women perhaps) who are providing you with SOLID alternative content because, for example, just this one blogpost alone, has taken me almost two hours to create and write. Imagine those who – like I used to be – are giving you masses of content everyday. They’re putting full days, everyday, into bringing you that content. So support them.”

Then again, some are definitely not doing sufficient research and background digging if they can pump out tons of content everyday so be careful about what you read.

And with that – ta ta till next time.

 

Charlottesville: “James Fields” framed! Incredible

Posted in "Terrorism", Geo-Political Warfare, Media, Uncategorized by earthling on August 20, 2017

As soon as you read this, share it. This is incredible (to those who are simply not following the nature of the deception we’re under).

Now, first off: I am not one to go off shouting my mouth off about “Crisis Actors” although I do see, clearly, that such exist and that many of these terrorist incidents we are seeing are staged. I tend not to (although have once or twice) covered them in any great depth because most people out there just do not wish to know. They don’t wish to “see” it or accept it. I also only cover things I can fully support and justify.

This, however, is one of those occasions because this is a 100% certainty which can readily be seen and IF anyone chooses not to acknowledge this, then there is something seriously wrong with them or they are part of it.

Yesterday, I just happened to have caught the video “interview” with James Fields “Mother” and, straight off the bat, I recognised fake. To anyone at all with the slightest ability to think, they will immediately say to themselves “This is NOT a mother who is just being told her son has murdered people by purposefully running them down in a car”. This woman is completely un-phased. Now, if this is James Fields mother then she knows something – she is fully aware that this is staged and that her son, while being held up through the media as a murderer, and Donald Trump and the entire US legal and media establishment will promulgate this lie, is fine and, even if we see him being charged, found guilty and incarcerated, there is something far more sinister happening here and this 20 year old lad is probably going to be given a new identity of some sort.

Having seen the video yesterday, I then went to watch it again today and, while searching for it, I came across two videos by a youtuber called “Wake up now”. My jaw dropped because what this guy had presented was as clear as day and it is why youtube decided to remove his video (the second one).

Any Police department worth its salt, anywhere in the world, could and would look at what I am about to show you and conclude the alleged driver and the actual driver are NOT one and the same person.

However, before we look at that, let’s check out the “mother” – the first thing which had my “antenna” sparking…

Actually, you know what? Bugger it! I just can’t take all this shit seriously anymore (not sure I ever could). I interrupted this blog article to record a piss take version of “Last train to Clarksville because it simply fitted. It’s all in there if you wish to take it in. ….

Need a false flag in Charlottesville
“Neo Nazi demonstration”
We’ll hire some guys from Antifa and well placed infiltration
like GI Joe
Oh no no no, oh no no no

Get a boy in from toledo with a dodge(y) challenger
Get a “mom” who knows what’s going on and blame it on her “son” – deception done
Oh no no no, oh no no no
But that pic of the driver’s made it go so terribly wrong

Need a false flag in Charlottesville
to oppress our “great free nation”
We just need “Crowds on demand”
It’s run by Peewee Herman don’t you know?
Oh no no no, oh no no no!

Doo doo doo…….

Need a false flag in Charlottesville
But I must hang up the phone
Two police in a helicopter may just have blown our show, they’ve got to go
Oh no no no, oh no no no
But how they go down no-one ever needs to know

Need a false flag in Charlottesville
Wanna re invent the state
and tear up the Constitution
And we will not hesitate coz we’re deep state
Oh no no no, oh no no no
Yeah the viral diaspora’s degenerate

Need a false flag in Charlottesville
Need a false flag in Charlottesville

“Crowds on demand” website:

Talent

And if that CEO , Adam Swart, doesn’t remind you of Pee Wee Herman, then I don’t know who would. I mean that voice! Unmistakable! Perhaps he’s Paul Reuben’s son? 🙂 He could literally be dumb as two short wooden planks (which wouldn’t surprise me) but, of course, he “invested in Southwest Airlines” at the age of 6 “due to its Honey Roasted peanuts”. ONLY a jew could come out with CRAP like that and get away with it! It blows my mind the utter gullibility of people. Given they DO get away with CRAP such as this (and much more besides) perhaps we do deserve what’s coming to us! How does an imbecile like this get to where he is? Oy veh! It’s pretty bloody obvious!

 

And just to finish off:

 

Oh yes! And regarding “British-Israel Group”, why do you think there is this determination to remove all your statues of American Founding Fathers and well respected Revolutionaries like Robert E Lee and demonise them as slave owners etc? Because you are also going through a period of “re-education” (it’ll take a generation or so) where your children will be re-taught your history (just as the Germans were re-educated after WW2, as well as the rest of us with Holocaust memorials and museums and having our children be spoonfed) so that. at the right time, the United States WILL become part of the British Empire once more.

What the HELL do you think this is all about:

Jerusalem Hymn

And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England’s mountain green?
And was the holy Lamb of God
On England’s pleasant pastures seen?
And did the countenance divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among those dark satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!
I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England’s green and pleasant land.

 

GOD SAVE THE F****** QUEEN!

She’s got to grind you down first however. And she’s doing a damned good job of it (as is the British-Israel UN)

 

Now, to those of you prone to shouting “Conspiracy theory!” – go dip your dull little head in an un-flushed toilet

Ah! But there’s more….. The guy who just so happened to be right there taking the car crash footage and it, subsequently, going viral on MSM Newsmedia: Now think of this guy and his “pal” who’s the actual driver of the car and is, most likely another CIA/Military spook.

When you step back from reading the above, a previously article of mine re “There’s life in America yet”, what’s coming below and also the article about “Britain re-taking the USA”, a very unnerving picture begins to develop. NONE of Charlottesville was just Americans getting mad and standing up for their rights. The entire thing – from the car crash, to the Robert E Lee march, to Police standing down, to the crowds on both sides – all of it manipulated and staged from top to bottom.

The following is taken from the website: “Whatdoesitmean.com”:

August 15, 2017

Russia Reports CIA “Genocide Expert” Orchestrated Charlottesville Mob Violence

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A truly shocking Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that a known Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) “genocide expert”, named Brennan Gilmore, was a “key orchestrator” behind this past weekends racial motivated mob violence occurring in Charlottesville, Virginia—and whom Russian intelligence experts have previously blamed for being a “central figure” behind the genocidal fighting between Muslim and Christian militias in the Central African Republic. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, in 2012, Brennan Gilmore was a known CIA deep cover operative stationed by the Obama regime as a Deputy Chief of Mission to the US Embassy in the Central African Republic, and who worked exclusively with the Muslim rebel group Séléka that were successful in the overthrow of that nations Christian majority controlled government on 24 March 2013—thereafter causing a Christian militia backlash of genocidal proportions known today as “The Forgotten Conflict” because of its being ignored by the West.

Upon President Donald Trump’s November 2016 election victory, this report continues, Brennan Gilmore returned to the United States (in early December 2016) and became the Chief of Staff for his former Central African Republic boss Tom Perriello—who launched a bid to become the Democratic Party governor of Virginia, but who was defeated in a 13 June 2017 primary election.

After leaving the campaign of Tom Perriello in mid-June (2017), this report details, Brennan Gilmore became an advisor to the Democratic Party mayor of Charlottesville, Virginia, named Michael Signer—who, before this past weekend, was most infamously known for his declaring his city “a capital of the resistance” against President Trump in February 2017.

Between the dates of 6-11 August, this report notes, SVR electronic intelligence intercepts noted Brennan Gilmore had numerous meetings and telephonic exchanges with Mayor Michael Signer and a former Obama supporter, and Occupy Wall Street activist, named Jason Kessler—but with Kessler now being described as “a relative newcomer to the white nationalist scene”, and who was the leader of the pro-fascist forces planning to demonstrate in Charlottesville on 12 August.

Democratic Party activist turned “white supremacist” Jason Kessler leaving meeting held between him, Brennan Gilmore and Mayor Michael Signer on 11 August 2017

And as to who this planned media spectacle played out in Charlottesville on 12 August, this report details, proved a “grim success” as, firstly, Jason Kessler led his pro-fascist forces on a “Unite The Right” march—followed, secondly, by Mayor Michael Singer ordering his cities police forces to stand down and not interfere when these pro-fascist forces met their communist led counter demonstrator foes.

With Jason Kessler and Mayor Michael Singer having “played their roles” in creating this media spectacle, this report says, third up was Brennan Gilmore—who “magically and mystically” was able to appear at the height of this created mob violence with a video camera in hand to record a pro-fascist supporter ramming his car into a crowd of communists agitators—with Brennan Gilmore, afterwards, being prominently interviewed by not only CNN, but every other anti-Trump “fake news” media outlet in America too—and whose statements were, obviously, pre-planned.

Office of Inspector General Inspection of Embassy Bangui, Central African Republic:

OIG BG

Go to page 27

Now, when listening to this guy give his account, bear in mind he is picking and repeating certain words carefully: Nazi, ideology, violence/violent. He also mentions semi automatic weapons (proof? None that I know of). He also states the car was accelerating at a high speed. WATCH the video of it. Watch the people getting out of the way. You can clearly see that car is moving at a speed of no more than, tops, 20mph – more probably 10mph. He also speaks from the perspective of not being one of the counter-protestors. So, how is it he just so happens to be the guy who takes this footage? Him of all people. Not a “Joe Bloggs” – they never are, as we have seen from Nice, Berlin and others.

This guy, Brennan Gilmore, is a communist, therefore he is working, directly or indirectly, for the British-Israel Group and is anti American. Of course, the vast majority of the US senate and congress are anti American. If you’re an American, you need to remember that. You are being stripped bare by the enemy within.

And Soros? = British-Israel Group.

soros_dossier

“But Soros almost broke the Bank of England during the crisis of the ERM in 1992! The Queen wouldn’t be happy about that!”

Really. You think?

What about the Bank of England nominees? Don’t you think “Her Majesty” likes to suck money from her subjects? She does it every single day! And she has an entire empire to suck from! 1992 was just one payment to Soros for doing his work.

Soros – Rothschild – Monarchy – British State Actors – US State Actors = All the same (just about). Who the “good guys” are is anyone’s guess but, as yet, I’ve still to see one.

It’s a wicked web they weave! Almost impenetrable

Infowars, Trump and Paul Joseph Watson Part 2

Posted in Media, The Corrupt SOB's by earthling on August 8, 2017

The following video is all you need to know about Trump – Infowars’ messiah for America.

Again, however, don’t ever expect Infowars to acknowledge this and don’t expect any American Christian Zionist to either. It’s hilarious really. So bloody transparent and the cognitive dissonance required by PJW and his chumps in Infowars, to totally ignore this crap.

Republicans want change. Democrats want change. Even Libertarians want change; Liberals, Conservatives, Labour and Conservative supporters; UKIP supporters and I could go on – ALL of them want change and they’ve wanted it for decades (if not centuries). They are NEVER going to get it. Why? Because they simply refuse to accept this. Their screams of “anti semite” at people like me and many others, ironically keeps them from finding and acquiring the change they want. Ah well. What pisses me off is that I have to live with it too because these numbskulls maintain the status quo in their wilful ignorance.

Now, once more, if you believe Trump is your saviour in any way, repeat after me:

“I AM A GULLIBLE ASSHOLE!”

Why Trump and Farage?

Posted in Political History, Politics by earthling on November 22, 2016

A short one because, in essence, it is already written in U.S. Congressional Archives (as you will see).

Having watched all this develop and listened and analysed closely what, how, who, why and when, this is my conclusion. You need not agree with it but I certainly do.

113550697_farage_trump-large_transeo_i_u9apj8ruoebjoaht0k9u7hhrjvuo-zlengruma

Why Trump and Farage? PERHAPS this is why:
What will Britain do? The day is coming when Britain will have to decide on one of three courses. First, shall she sink—comparatively to the giant consolidations—into a third- or fourth-rate power, a Holland or Belgium comparatively? Here note that we do not postulate her actual decline, but the increased growth of other powers. Or, second, shall she consolidate with a European giant? Or, third, shall she grasp the outstretched hand of her children in America and become again as she was before, the mother member of the English-speaking race?

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/10/04/united-states-congressional-record-the-new-world-order/
And look up “The Pilgrims Society” on Wikipedia. Note who the Patron is and then look at the names associated with it. (HINT: Liz)

Add:
Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to read the speeches given by the American members of the Pilgrims, for they, like all converts, are more un-American and pro-English than the British themselves.
…..
Mr. Choate then referred to a dispute which arose in regard to the passage of ships through the Panama Canal, and intimated that it was the understanding of Hon. John Hay and Lord Landsdowne that the British should have equal rights with us in the use of this Canal; a right which the British have never conceded to the United States in the Suez Canal. We have even been driven out of foreign markets by England for many, many years, and in her wars she has brazenly furnished us with a blacklist of firms with which we are not supposed to trade; and we, like fools, comply with her demands.
….
Now the people of this country are not going to allow anybody— any Congress, any government, any President—to break the good faith which they have pledged to the mother country. In making this statement, Mr. Choate takes the position that Great Britain or England is our mother country; the same position that was taken by Cecil Rhodes over 50 years ago and by Andrew Carnegie in 1893, when he wrote a book entitled, “Triumphant Democracy.” I want you to note particularly that this was in 1913, and that 1913 was the very year we changed our Government from a republic to a semidemocracy; the year in which we destroyed constitutional government, international security, and paved the road for us to become a colony of the British Empire. It was also the same year in which we, by adopting the Federal Reserve Act, placed our Treasury under the control and domination of the Bank of England and the international banking groups that are now financing the British-Israel movement in the United States.

https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/american-congressional-record-1940/

SO much more detail I could give you to support this but I just don’t have the time to write a book.

BETS PLEASE!

Trump’s America: Destroyed by Executive Orders!

Posted in Law, Political History, Politics by earthling on November 7, 2011

So you love your new President’s Executive Orders?

In a few years’ time you will understand what they were all about you STUPID people!

But meanwhile, in your ignorance and false hope (just a “mirror” of Obama’s which you also fell for) you’re supporting the destruction of your country.

But hey, I know you’ll never believe or admit to it. But then, I don’t say I’m more intelligent than you (not at all), I just say I’ve done a vast amount more research to understand it.

(And for those of you who may be new to this site – I am neither American NOR liberal, nor right wing – I don’t buy into it all because I see the “show” which it is)

America: Not too long from now, you are in for a rude awakening. However, it will be subtle while you, strangely, buy into it. They’ve won – they’ve divided you sufficiently to be able to take the next steps.

US President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders in the Hall of Heroes at the Department of Defense Friday, Jan. 27, 2017 in Arlington, Va. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS) 1196704

US President Donald Trump signs Executive Orders in the Hall of Heroes at the Department of Defense Friday, Jan. 27, 2017 in Arlington, Va. (Olivier Douliery/Abaca Press/TNS) 1196704

 

Dear America,

It was nice knowing you! You never quite managed Independence (even though you may have thought you did but then you know how immensely deceptive these people are now and have always been) but you were the closest thing to freedom – note I do not use that disgusting, deceptive term “democracy” – that the planet ever had. However, even all the way back to George Washington, you were never quite free. But that detail, perhaps, is for another time, another blog and will take a long, arduous explanation.

How America was founded – the principles in a nutshell:

A Republic, If You Can Keep It
Jacob G. Hornberger, November 2001

AT THE CLOSE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION, a woman asked Benjamin Franklin what type of government the Constitution was bringing into existence. Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

Regardless of one’s judgment concerning the type of government that the Constitution brought into existence in 1787, no one can deny that it was truly the most unusual and radical in history.

Consider: With the tragic exception of slavery, the United States was a society in which people could, by and large, engage in any occupation or economic enterprise without a government license, permit, or regulation.

Where people could travel anywhere in the world without restriction (no passports) and trade with whomever they pleased without the permission of their government officials.

Where people could accumulate unlimited amounts of wealth without government interference, because the Constitution did not permit the government to levy taxes on income.

Where people were free to do whatever they wanted with their own money — save, spend, donate, invest, hoard, or even destroy it.

Where government was not permitted to take care of people — no Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, education grants, or foreign aid.

With a few exceptions (e.g., 1850s Massachusetts), there were no compulsory public (i.e., government) school systems.

No wars on drugs, poverty, or wealth.

And open borders for the free immigration of people from anywhere in the world.

Like I say, regardless of how you might feel about the political and economic philosophy of the Founders of our country, no one can deny that the political and economic system that they brought into existence was the most unusual and radical in history.

Our Founders’ philosophy toward foreign affairs was also an unusual one. A primary responsibility of the U.S. government, they believed, was to protect the nation from invasion or attack and not involve itself in the affairs or conflicts of other nations.

The Founders clearly understood that horrible things would be seen all over the world, such as brutal tyrannies and cruel dictatorships — after all, they themselves had only recently been the victims of the brutality and cruelty of the British Empire.

But they believed that the best gift that America could give to the world would be a model for a free, peaceful, harmonious, and prosperous society — a beacon for the rest of the world to follow. And they believed that that goal would be not be served if their government had the imperial power to straighten out messes all over the world.

Here’s what George Washington counseled to all succeeding generations of Americans in his Farewell Address:

“The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible…. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns…. Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?”

Celebrating American freedom on July 4, 1821, U.S. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams delivered a speech to the U.S. House of Representatives setting forth the vision of the American republic:

She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart…. She goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own…. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence … the fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force…. She might become the dictatress of the world.

Thus, when our 18th- and 19th-century ancestors celebrated the Fourth of July each year, the concept of freedom that they were celebrating was totally different from the concept of freedom that Americans today celebrate on the Fourth. The freedom they celebrated involved a way of life in which government had little power to take their money, regulate their peaceful activities, or take care of them. It was also a freedom arising out of their government’s noninterference in the conflicts of foreign nations.

No one can deny that somewhere along the way, America changed direction, both domestically and internationally. How about a national debate as to which vision — the vision of Washington, Adams, Franklin, and Madison, or that of Wilson, Roosevelt, Johnson, and Nixon — should guide our nation into its third century of existence?

Meanwhile, let’s look at the reality behind what is termed an “Executive Order” by your President:

Executive Orders: The authority to use Executive Orders isn’t even provided for in the US Constitution! It’s clear that when a President is sworn in he is the Executive and has the power to ensure the law is faithfully/properly executed but the following is essentially all that refers to the Executive power of the President within your Constitution….

“The President shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…”

But that does not, in any way, suggest that he has any power to create laws and yet that is what all these EOs do!

The Constitution clearly means that he ensures law (as created by the CONSTITUTION not him!) is executed properly! They have seriously gone way beyond their powers and remit!

Washington himself was the first to issue an Executive Order. Unfortunately, however – and rather ironically, it was he who created the precedent so early into this Republic governed by the rule of law NOT Executive Order!

President Rutherford Hayes once warned that although  American chief executives had to that point been conservative men wedded both to  precedent and to modesty in the exercise of presidential power, a future  president committed to concentrating power in his hands could make of the office  what he wished.

Attorney William J. Olson spoke to those gathered for Y2K and the Presidency, the May 8 conference sponsored by The Conservative Caucus, concerning the unconstitutional use of Executive Orders. Excerpts from his talk follow:

“President Washington issued the first Proclamation; it was…to declare a Day of National Thanksgiving. It was…pursuant to some Congressional action… certainly that’s a Proclamation that’s perfectly legitimate. …

“Even his Whiskey Rebellion Proclamation…was pursuant to a 1792 statute.”

“But then we get to the Neutrality Proclamation, which did not cite any Congressional or statutory authority. It sought to impose penalties on U.S. citizens who would deal with European powers at war. …it was viewed by others in government as an abuse of Executive authority.

And, when prosecutions were begun under that statute, the
court said, ‘No, that does not have the force of law, Mr. President. That is your opinion. You do not have the Congress’s concurrence.
…’ The Congress then passed the law, and the prosecutions continued. But in any event, it was very instructive time because people had then read the Constitution. …”

[Note this last proclamation forbade any dealings with European powers at war. A GOOD call actually considering the fact that the Bush patriarch and so many other so called “Americans” (actually all globalists no matter whether they hold an American passport) funded the Nazi war machine even after war was declared and so many of the Allied Powers troops were slaughtered by the “machine” – well oiled let’s say – which these so called “patriots” funded. Why is America (and yes Britain too) so stupid an sleepy-headed to acknowledge the facts that our governments and their Corporate/Banking paymasters play both sides and kill our own?]

Before leaving George Washington however, it is immensely enlightening to read incredibly prophetic words from the man regarding the introduction of political parties – Republican and Democrat not existing until after Washington’s Presidency (although there had been Federalists and Anti Federalists there were no specific parties):

The Dangers of Political Parties

Washington continues to advance his idea of the dangers of sectionalism and expands his warning to include the dangers of political parties to the government and country as a whole. His warnings took on added significance with the recent creation of the Democratic-Republican Party by Jefferson, to oppose Hamilton’s Federalist Party, which had been created a year earlier in 1791, which in many ways promoted the interest of certain regions and groups of Americans over others. A more pressing concern for Washington, which he makes reference to in this portion of the address, was the Democratic-Republican efforts to align with France and the Federalist efforts to ally the nation with Great Britain in an ongoing conflict between the two European nations brought about by the French Revolution.
[Note: It is then obvious from this that the Federalists exist today in the form of Republicans while the Democrats have been more aligned with the French/German EU concept albeit that in the past 10 years or so Democrat and Republican, just as with Labour and Conservative in the UK, have been far more strongly aligned. Such is the influence of the real powers: Bankers, Bilderberg etc. There is still this split however to a degree whereby, in Europe, the British Conservative party, on the whole, still wish to have the greater say in Europe than the Labour Party which ties in with the Federalist/Republican attitude toward the UK and Europe. They all want the EU, it is just there is a little “negotiation” going on as to who has the greatest power within it. I am sure the Pilgrim Society will be working hard on this!]

While Washington accepts the fact that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups like political parties, he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and take revenge on political opponents.

Moreover, Washington makes the case that “the alternate domination” of one party over another and coinciding efforts to exact revenge upon their opponents have led to horrible atrocities, and “is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism.” From Washington’s perspective and judgment, the tendency of political parties toward permanent despotism is because they eventually and “gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual.”

Washington goes on to acknowledge the fact that parties are sometimes beneficial in promoting liberty in monarchies, but argues that political parties must be restrained in a popularly elected government because of their tendency to distract the government from their duties, create unfounded jealousies among groups and regions, raise false alarms amongst the people, promote riots and insurrection, and provide foreign nations and interests access to the government where they can impose their will upon the country.

Back to Executive Orders:

“Presidential executive orders are a particular type of presidential document that has the force of law founded on his authority derived from the Constitution or a federal statute. There is no law defining “executive order”, the meaning of the term has varied over the years. Prior to 1936, a document was an “executive order” because the president himself designated it as such. On February 18, 1936, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 7298 prescribing a uniform manner of preparing executive orders”.

guide_prespapers.html

Isn’t it interesting to read how the University of Oregon puts this? “has the force of law founded on his authority derived from the Constitution or a federal statute”.

The reality is nothing of the kind. There is NO authority derived from the Constitution or a Federal Statute whatsoever as we saw earlier. They even indicate this when they say  “There is no law defining “executive order””. We have to then assume that American law students just accept this on face value! Not very prudent of them then and indicates a concerning lack of diligence on their part!

Can Executive Orders be Overridden or Withdrawn?

The president can amend or retract an executive at any time. The president may also issue an executive order superseding an existing one. New incoming presidents may choose to retain the executive orders issued by their predecessors, replace them with new ones of their own, or revoke the old ones completely. In extreme cases, Congress may pass a law that alters an executive order, and they can be declared unconstitutional and vacated by the Supreme Court.

Therefore, let’s be clear here: Executive Orders are NOT “Law” at all in ANY shape or form. They are purely the wishes of the incumbent President. Period! That is purely and simply a dictator’s dream!

Theodore Roosevelt did not merely extend executive prerogative here or  there; he put forth a full-fledged philosophy of the presidency that attempted  to justify his dramatic expansion of that office. He contended that the  president, by virtue of his election by the nation as a whole, possessed a  unique claim to be the representative of the entire American people – a position  taken by Andrew Jackson during the 1830s and for which he was sharply rebuked by  John C. Calhoun. Each member of the executive branch, but especially the  president, “was a steward of the people bound actively and affirmatively to do  all he could for the people.” He could, therefore, “do anything that the needs  of the nation demanded” unless expressly prohibited in the Constitution. “Under  this interpretation of executive power,” TR later reflected, “I did and caused  to be done many things not previously done. … I did not usurp power, but I did  greatly broaden the use of executive power.”

Since TR believed himself to be doing the people’s will,  and since he believed his own rhetoric that portrayed the president as the  people’s unique representative in American government, his need to fulfill this  special mission overrode concerns about the separation of powers. He remarked  privately that in the United States, “as in any nation which amounts to  anything, those in the end must govern who are willing actually to do the work  of governing; and in so far as the Senate becomes a merely obstructionist body  it will run the risk of seeing its power pass into other hands.”

It was TR who pioneered rule by executive order as a  governing style among American presidents. Many Americans rightly howled during  the 1990s when Bill Clinton’s aide Paul Begala famously said of executive  orders, “Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool.” But Clinton, who once  called Theodore Roosevelt his favorite Republican president, was only exercising  a power that TR had made a major feature of the presidential office early in the  century.

To appreciate the transformation that occurred in  American government under TR, consider the number of executive orders issued by  the presidents of the late 19th century. Presidents Hayes and Garfield each  issued none. Arthur issued three, Grover Cleveland (first term) six, Benjamin  Harrison four, Cleveland (second term) 71, and McKinley 51. TR issued  1,006.

Now, it is true that TR served nearly two terms. But  that figure is so much higher than that of his predecessors that it reveals a  vastly different philosophy of the presidency from that held by those who  preceded him.

To take just one domestic example, TR intervened in the  United Mine Workers strike in 1902, ordering the mine owners to agree to  arbitration. Should they instead remain obstinate, he threatened to order the  Army to take over and operate the coalmines. When informed that no  constitutional authorization existed for such a brazen act of confiscation, he  replied, “To hell with the Constitution when the people want coal!”

Vice President Dick Cheney recently told the Washington  Post that when the Bush administration entered office, it was determined to  reinvigorate the presidency and reverse the steady reduction in executive power  and prerogative that had persisted since Watergate. But what reduction could the  vice president have had in mind? “The vice president,” noted Sen. John E. Sununu  (R-N.H.), “may be the only person I know of that believes the executive has  somehow lost power over the last 30 years.”

Whether or not the vice president was correct in his  analysis of the state of the presidency in the year 2000, there can be no  question that since then George W. Bush has dramatically expanded the powers of  the president – primarily though not exclusively in matters pertaining to the  war on terror.

One of the most notorious examples involved the torture  of prisoners, a power the administration claimed in the face of law and  international agreements to the contrary. “The assertion in the various legal  memoranda that the President can order the torture of prisoners despite statutes  and treaties forbidding it was another reach for presidential hegemony,” wrote  Anthony Lewis in the New York Review of Books. “The basic premise of the  American constitutional system is that those who hold power are subject to the  law…Bush’s lawyers seem ready to substitute something like the divine right of  kings.”

The Limits of Presidential Power:  Domestic Surveillance

Arguably the greatest controversy of all was the  revelation at the end of 2005 that the Bush administration had engaged in  domestic surveillance without the necessary warrants. James Bamford, author of  two books on the National Security Agency, points out the pertinent aspects of  what would appear to be the relevant law: the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance  Act (FISA), passed in 1978. According to Bamford, then-Attorney General Griffin  Bell testified before the intelligence committee that FISA acknowledged no “inherent power of the President to conduct electronic surveillance.”

As Bell himself put it, “This bill specifically states  that the procedures in the bill are the exclusive means by which electronic  surveillance may be conducted.”

In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush administration  officials spoke again and again of the president’s inherent powers. But the  pertinent statute in this case disclaims any such powers and requires that the  president proceed according to the guidelines set out by Congress, which  involves securing warrants from a special court. As things stand, the president  is claiming a right to engage in surveillance of any American, unrestrained by  any institutional check, in the service of the war on terror – a war that by its  very nature must go on indefinitely and, indeed, that we can never really know  is truly over.

According to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the  reason the administration did not seek to revise FISA to give the president the  clear and unambiguous power to order these wiretaps was that even a Republican  Congress would not have gone along. In a Dec. 19 press briefing, the attorney  general said, “We have had discussions with Congress in the past – certain  members of Congress – as to whether or not FISA could be amended to allow us to  adequately deal with this kind of threat, and we were advised that that would be  difficult, if not impossible.”

The administration’s claim, as set forth by the attorney  general, is that Congress implicitly agreed to such wiretaps when in the days  following Sept. 11 it authorized the use of force against the perpetrators and  their allies. Of course, if Congress really had authorized them, it is not clear  why it would be so difficult for the administration to persuade Congress to  amend FISA accordingly in light of this permission.

The Limits of  Presidential Power: The New  Deal

Gonzales’s argument calls to mind H.L. Mencken’s 1937 “Constitution for the New Deal,” a satirical rewrite of the U.S Constitution,  which says of the attorney general, “It shall be his duty to provide legal  opinions certifying to the constitutionality of all measures undertaken by the  President.”

As the controversy over the wiretapping developed, it  was only a matter of time before the “even Lincoln did it” argument would be  heard. GOP apologists did not disappoint, reminding Americans that Honest Abe  engaged in massive violations of civil liberties while president. But Tom  DiLorenzo raises the proper reply to such claims in the form of remarks by  Supreme Court Justice David Davis – a personal friend of Lincoln – in the 1866  case Ex Parte Milligan: “The constitution of the United States is a law for  rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its  protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No  doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was ever invented by the wit  of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great  exigencies of government.”

As DiLorenzo suggests, if the government were to be  given carte blanche during wartime, all that would be necessary to whittle away  the people’s liberties would be to concoct – or to provoke – an endless series  of crises.

This is all deeply disturbing, to be sure. But to hear  much of the Left tell it, the presidency of George W. Bush is a bizarre  aberration in the history of the presidency and more or less sui generis. I have  no objection to those who describe the Bush presidency as utterly disastrous,  and I do not mean to excuse the president by recalling that the ideological and  institutional roots of the imperial presidency extend back at least a century.  My point, rather, is that a bit of history can enrich our  understanding.

Now, with all that in mind, perhaps you would wish to read the following Executive Order (just one of MANY bad ones which has been formulated to destroy America) written by George H.W. Bush:

?pid=23625#axzz1cxzNkkB0

He put America on sale to the highest bidder. While REMEMBER, all of that infrastructure (and natural resources) was built by you, the American people and funded by your tax dollars! The important Executive Orders for the people truly in charge never get repealed and the ones that do not quite do the job, get amended.

And note:

“Consistent with the principles of federalism enumerated in Executive Order No.
12612”
Federalism = “Monarchism” = Despotism
And now, it is so ingrained into your psyche that the Federal Government is all there ever has been and ever shall be that you have lost sight of what it SHOULD have been! You therefore, have lost your liberty and freedom America as so mant said you would. But it’s been out of sheer ignorance and misplaced pride. But pride comes before a fall.
The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those opposed to the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals; those that claimed a new centralized, disguised “monarchic” power that would only replace the cast-off despotism of Great Britain with the proposed government; and those who simply feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties. Some of the opposition believed that the central government under the Articles of Confederation was sufficient. Still others believed that while the national government under the Articles was too weak, the national government under the Constitution would be too strong. Another complaint of the Anti-Federalists was that the Constitution provided for a centralized rather than Federal Government (and in the Federalist papers James Madison admits that the new Constitution has the characteristics of both a centralized and federal form of the government) and that a truly federal form of government was a leaguing of states as under the Articles of Confederation.
With the passage of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the Anti-Federalist movement was exhausted. It was succeeded by the more broadly based Anti-Administration Party, which opposed the fiscal and foreign policies of U.S. President George Washington.

Noted Anti-Federalists

One can also argue that Thomas Jefferson expressed several anti-federalist thoughts throughout his life, but that his involvement in the discussion was limited, since he was stationed as Ambassador to France while the debate over federalism was going on in America in the Federalist papers and Anti-Federalist Papers.

And who is it, do you think, who demands all of these Executive Orders and for what purpose?

It’s VERY simple. When you wish to destroy the sovereignty of a nation which has a working Constitution based upon the rule of law, you ensure you can change the law.

My question is: How do you make a “Conspiracy Theory” out of a blatant confession?

Rockefeller’s 2002 autobiography “Memoirs” he wrote: “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

A child could understand this and say “There you go dad! There’s the culprit! Well at least the main “American” one!”

Oh the Irony!

As you cheer your new President on, because his Executive Orders are “stiffing” (so you believe) the liberals and the NWO, you’re actually promoting the death of that Constitution you conservatives, Republicans and Tea-Partyists say you love!

This “game” of theirs is FAR deeper than it seems you can fathom.

While, what do you do when you recognise the public are on to you? You give them a “leader” and promote him by attacking him endlessly and viciously because then the people BELIEVE he’s working for them! Such a simple, reverse psychology tactic. And your man Trump is one great actor!

How about that for sheer stupidity?

NB: Portions of this blog have been taken from various sources including Wikipedia and The Daily Reckoning.