David (L.Ron) Icke: Welcome to the first church of appliantology!
SIGN UP NOW TO £1 A MONTH DONATIONS TO TSV (“THE SHEEPLES VOICE”) AND WIN A BRAND NEW DIGITAL TOASTER FROM RUSSELL HOBBS! IT CAN BE PROGRAMMED TO ACCURATELY DETERMINE THE FUTURE COLOUR OF YOUR BREAD AND WHEN YOU’RE GONNA DIE!
RRP: £39.99. TSV PRICE (ON SIGN UP TO 2 YEAR CONTRACT): FREE
WELCOME TO THE FIRST CHURCH OF APPLIANTOLOGY: THE ONLY CHURCH THAT OFFERS INSTANT TECHNOLOGICAL SEXUAL GRATIFICATION WHILE TUNING IN TO SONIA POULTON! OR, FOR THE LADIES: RICHIE ALLEN!
HERE IS A WELCOME NOTE BY OUR PATRON AND CHIEF SHAREHOLDER, L. RON ICKE:
Welcome, Are you sick of being lied to? Do you realise there is a new church on the block which provides you with 24 hour third eye stimulation and additional stimulation if you sign up to a two year contract with us for ongoing support donations? I am the head curator, creator, instigator and verbal masturbator of the first church of appliantology known as TSV. Everyone has a voice at TSV and everyone has a choice. We believe in freewill and I can assure you, you will be welcomed with open arms when you decide to join us. The world is an ugly place at the moment (always has been but let’s not go there) and by joining our church, we will give you the tools you need to recognise whether an entity is trying to possess you and whether that entity is benign or malign in its intent. Reptilians are everywhere, as you well know and it is important, that, for the overall well-being of the human race and our future on our beautiful planet, that we eradicate the influence of these nasty entities. What we at the church can do for humanity to achieve this goal is to ensure that the world’s population attains OT status (Operating Thetan) by getting totally zoned out on your preference of drug and also be furnished with the digital toaster we are giving to each and every donator free of charge which, not only does as is stated above, but also provides the second important element of becoming OT – that is alpha wave, vibrational frequencies which physically stimulate your glans or clit at optimal levels to produce constant orgasmic ecstasy. Dr Manjir Samanta-Laughton has studied the field of bio-energy and has a Diploma in it from Plexus Institute (more details below). Dr Manjir developed the toaster with Russell Hobbs specifically for sheeple like YOU! Come join us! David (L.Ron) IckePlease play the video/song as you read on. You’ll get the picture!
I had a quick look at Scientology today because I came across (not literally) a woman by the name of “Dr” Manjir Samanta-Laughton who presents “Hidden Science” on The Sheeple’s Voice. I noticed she held a “MBBS dip Bio-Energy” and thought to myself “What the hell is that?”. I googled the term and the only thing that came up on the first page were links relating to “Dr” Manjir.
There was a link to a profile of the “Dr” and, from it, it would SEEM she has an MBBS as a Medical Doctor while it also stated that, at the age of 18, she had a kundalini experience which totally changed her from a skeptic to a “believer” – in what, I’m unsure really. Anyhow, it would seem that, even after that experience, she continued study of medicine (you know? The medicine that is presented to us as life saving and healthy by the governments and their private medical corporations) and then she veered off into “Bio Energy”. Sounds exciting and very scientific doesn’t it? Must be hell of an intellect to get a Diploma (remember NOT an MBBS which, the way she writes her credentials – no commas – would suggest the MBBS was in Bio-Energy) in a subject like that eh?
Well no, not exactly. You see the “Plexus Institute” is pretty much a place where you pay your dues (money), you come out with a diploma. Let me explain that. Have you ever studied a degree? In any subject at any university or college of further education? If not, no matter. You wouldn’t really expect that University to demand a CONTRACT be signed now would you? Yes you register for University and all that but a CONTRACT? What on earth would a contract be for? Well, let’s see:
I have searched to find ANYTHING related to credentials (REAL credentials) for Michael O’Doherty who founded the PLEXUS Institute. Anything whatsoever that would even indicate that this guy has some background of study which would allow him to formulate ANY solid grounds for his “Healing practice” (and no I don’t give a damn that Michael Flatley says the healing got rid of a 3 year virus he had – one of my children had serious asthma for about 3 years when very young and then we leave the UK to live in the Philippines and it disappears overnight and never comes back even after leaving South East Asia. I’m convinced that the change of climate must have helped but I have no proof of it and Doctors would not suggest that that is all it took). There is no suggestion whatsoever that Michael O’Doherty has any medical or otherwise – scientific, nothing – background. And here we have some jumped up “MD” (she’ll never get a job in medicine again that’s for sure) saying she has a “MBBS dip Bio-Energy” qualification??? BULLSHIT! You pay money to this O’Doherty “Institute” and you spend 8 weekends (16 days!) and you heal people with “vibrational energy”. COME ON FOLKS! It’s time to wake the hell up! VOODOO has been ongoing for centuries and so has snake oil salesmen!
Here’s part of the “contract”:
Michael wants full control of the media and public relations. When you use digital video techniques to give yourself a bit of “Hollywood” healing, you’ve also got to have complete control on what is stated to the media and public.
Now L.Ron has a “healer” sponsor by the name of NPL (quite close to NLP then isn’t it? :-)) who provided £1000 in the initial donation drive. Here’s the thing: Icke talks about only accepting sponsors who are positive or, at least neutral, in their effect upon society. Ok, let’s consider that shall we? The shite that Plexus or NPL promote, on the face of it, can, at worst, be “neutral” UNTIL you consider one aspect. Once more, it’s money. These “16 day therapists” charge a fee for doing what they do. I’m saying it’s total crap and bullshit and so, that being the case, it isn’t exactly “neutral”. It is embezzling money from people. If you want to believe that a bunch of Irish leprechauns or any other twat with a “dip” after their name (a 16 day “dip” no less) can heal you, then be my guest. My opinion is you must be a fricking “dip”stick!
Healing in action (plus digital effects overlay to give you that warm fuzzy feeling):
So, what we have in “Dr” Manjir (if you’re not practicing in your field “Dr” then you are no longer a “Dr” whatever qualification you may have) – I’m no physicist or Plumber or Electrician yet I’m qualified in them all – is at the very most, a GP who’s now lecturing you on Black holes and cosmology and every other science under the sun yet with credentials in NONE of it! How DUMB are you people? Anyone on a TV show and you STILL fall into the fucking trap of “celebrity”. AWAKENED MY ARSEUM!
So now, let’s turn to “L.Ron” Icke once more.
What does Icke preach?
1. Reincarnation (he was Socrates in a previous life dontcha know?)
2. A supreme being. The “Godhead”.
3. Alice Bailey’s 7 rays. But according to L.Ron Icke, used for benign purposes (thick as shit).
4. Man is a spirit. Man is not his body.
So what, then if we consider scientology? Well, here’s THEIR version:
1. It is a fact that unless one begins to handle aberration built up in past lives, he doesn’t progress. In Scientology, one is given the tools to handle upsets and aberrations from past lives that adversely affect the individual in the present, thus freeing one to live a much happier life. Scientologists believe that people are immortal spiritual beings who have lived before and who will live again, and that their future happiness and immortality as spiritual beings depend on how they conduct themselves in the here and now.
2. In Scientology, the concept of God is expressed as the Eighth Dynamic—the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. As the Eighth Dynamic, the Scientology concept of God rests at the very apex of universal survival.
3. Fundamental to Scientology is a view of Man as a spiritual being. In Scientology, the spiritual being is called the thetan. The term is taken from the Greek letter theta for “thought” or “life” or “the spirit.” It is used to avoid confusion with previous concepts of the soul. The thetan is immortal and has lived—and will continue to live—through countless lifetimes. One is a thetan who has a mind and who occupies a body. The thetan animates the body and uses the mind.
4. In Scientology, this phenomenon is called exteriorization—the detachment of one’s spirit from the body while yet fully conscious and aware. Scientology believes that Man is not his body, his mind or his brain. He, a spiritual force, energizes the physical body. Indeed, through the discovery of exteriorization, Scientology proved, for the first time, that Man is a spiritual being.
So, L.Ron Icke is obviously a “Thetan”. He meets all the criteria after all.
Read about Lucis Trust’s and Alice Bailey’s 7 ray teachings. They are not the same as scientology’s but there are many parallels because all of this sort of stuff is just re-treatments of the same shit. And it is all DANGEROUS shit! Because it deflects your/our attention from the realities of what we face.
http://www.lucistrust.org/en/arcane_school/talks_and_articles/the_science_of_the_seven_rays
So, onto the psychics. You know? I have an idea for TSV. For every guest they have on their shows (particularly the politicians – if ever they actually achieve getting a current one on), they should have them interviewed by the friendly neighbourhood psychic, or at least have the psychic in the background “reading” them. It would then be possible for the psychic to recognise the aura of a reptilian just as L.Ron’s psychic recognised that his ex wife, Pamela, was a reptilian – Phew! That was a close call Dave eh?
The psychic can then break onto the show and shout “REPTILIAN ALERT”. Now THAT would make for some seriously good viewing L.Ron!
Lastly, here’s a few thoughts on our problem with these reptilians and what, ultimately, I wonder, would L.Ron suggest we do with them once we’ve all awakened and can recognise them. Do we kill them? I mean, will they go away when we put our glasses on and they feel visually “raped”? If we ALL buy a pair of ray bans and put them on at the same time, would the reptilians all vanish back to the Draco constellation or would they put up a fight?
If we recognise one, individually, say down a dark alley one night, what do we do? Is it a stake through the heart? Burn them alive? A bullet? What? And whatever it is we need to do, why didn’t you do it to Pamela?
HEADLINE NEWS: “DAVID ICKE IN CUSTODY SUSPECTED ON BOILING EX WIFE PAMELA IN LARGE IRON CAULDRON. ICKE STATED HE THOUGHT SHE WAS A FROG AND WAS SIMPLY TESTING THE BOILING FROG THEORY.”
David Icke: “Everytime we open our mouths….”
Just taking the man at his word!
“But these are facts” say his faithful. Are they? Prove Savile was a necrophiliac. Prove Diana was ritually abused at Balmoral. Prove George H W Bush is a child abusing paedophile. I’m not saying they are not true but I am also saying that Icke DID NOT claim anything anywhere about Savile until after it came out. What I AM saying is that there is no proof for these allegations yet you take them as facts. That is scary. I cannot imagine what you would be like in a court as a member of a jury having to make a decision of life or death based on “facts”.
Yet Mr Icke gets away with all of this while he states that when one opens one’s mouth to speak of others, one is speaking more about themselves. Then the video simply takes him at his word. Not MY word (I think he talks shit actually) but HIS word.
So here are some FACTS (no inverted commas) which I have already stated about Mr Icke. But because I state THESE facts against HIM, I am somehow speaking more about myself? But he’s not when he states HIS “facts” against others? What a STRANGE duality of thought you Ickeans (and Icke and his cohorts themselves) live in.
1. He has stated that disabled and handicapped people have brought their lot in life upon themselves due to past actions in past lives. Mr Icke, therefore, must have beaten the crap out of someone with arthritis when he was Socrates then.
2. He told all the local IOW poll tax protestors that they should not pay up and he would join them but, quietly, pays up.
3. He states that The People’s Voice is a “Not for profit” enterprise and there will be no shareholder return ( a “Not for profit” is normally a Charity status company or a Private Limited company by guarantee and not share capital). TPV Limited is a Private Limited Company WITH share capital and, therefore, there ARE shareholders. Your donations build the value of that company with every single £1 you donate. Guess who the shareholder is but he doesn’t want any other shareholders?
4. He states that TPV will not be regulated and controlled but then, when he should be doing the “non comply dance” and telling OFCOM to stick it, he does the opposite and complies – just like the poll tax issue then.
5. It is clear from all the previous TPV videos leading up to launch that he had no intention of divulging that the equipment cost him £20K. He consistently stated things like “This doesn’t come cheap you know” (check out the videos for verification of what I am saying.
6. He has £104K CASH at the bank for David Icke Books Ltd but he doesn’t use a cent of that when he could have paid for the entire equipment and have over £80K left cash in DI Books Ltd (and that is not his personal cash savings and investments).
7. He doesn’t tell you that TPV OBVIOUSLY had every intention of getting an OFCOM licence. Obvious because his son gave it away when he stated – even before TPV went live – that the intention was to become the mainstream and broadcast on terrestrial and/or satellite networks such as SKY. If that was the intention (which it was and is) then there was every intention of getting a licence.
8. He dictates that people should not comply while he then complies at every turn. He’s like the general telling his troops to get up out of the trenches and “be men” while he sits back with a cigar.
ALL of the above (and more) are FACTS about David Icke yet, because it’s me stating them against YOUR demigog, I am “persona non grata” and because I open my mouth, I am speaking of myself? When David speaks he isn’t of course speaking about himself. David icke hates exposure (as do the people he exposes, or suggests he exposes) so I am his enemy. What do you do about enemies? You use ad hominem attacks and demonise them among your followers and you suggest that they are speaking about themselves even though they are simply stating the facts.
It’s precisely what the mainstream media and establishment do to their enemies. Would David Icke give me a voice on his network? No chance. He and his goons delete my blogs which other post on his website forum to ensure nobody reads what I have to say about him.
Now consider this: The establishment tend to use D notices and any other tactic to shut their enemies up (a little like what Davey does on his forums) but guess what? That same establishment give him a LICENCE to promulgate his shit.
AND YOU THINK HE AND YOU ARE THREATENING THE ESTABLISHMENT WITH “THE PEOPLE’S VOICE”.
Why do you think he needed to suggest an all out cyber attack on TPV and DI websites?
Our Dave’s studied his subject for a long time. So long he is using precisely the same techniques as his “mortal enemy” from getting money created for him out of nothing to false flag events.
And me and people like me who know better are sitting pissing ourselves laughing at people like you while David keeps taking your money to the bank and increasing the value of that Private Limited Company with share capital!
In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public.
It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopian dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: each one of them on his own account is boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established form of order. By these acts all States are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super-Government, and with submissiveness.
I beg you to note that among those making attacks upon us will also be organs established by us, but they will attack exclusively points that we have pre-determined to alter.
Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
The part played by the liberals, utopian dreamers, will be finally played out when our government is acknowledged. Till such time they will continue to do us good service. Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain conceptions of fantastic theories, new and apparently progressive: for have we not with complete success turned the brainless heads of the goyim with progress, till there it not among the goyim one mind able to perceive that under this work lies a departure from truth in all cases where it is not a question of material inventions, for truth is one, and in it there is no place for progress. Progress, like a fallacious idea, serves to obscure truth so that none may know it except us, the Chosen of God, its guardians.
When we come into our kingdom our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under our beneficent rule.
Who will ever suspect then that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?
THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION
David Icke & Jimmy Savile: It doesn’t add up!
Here is an article on David Icke’s website:
NOTE: ” But I have known about Savile since the 1990s…” AND “I knew that Savile supplied former Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath with young boys – I have been exposing Heath since 1998…”
Now listen to his interview on Liberty Tactics:
“I was first told that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile in 1997/98….”
So, get this: He writes about Heath in “The Biggest Secret” in 1998 but he makes NO mention of Savile which he admits he was told about at the very same time. Not only that but over the course of the next decade and the books he then wrote, he did NOT, in any one of them, mention Jimmy Savile. YET, he knew about Savile at the same time he knew about Heath? In his OWN words! So what’s the score David? IF you knew about Savile as you say you did, then why no mention of him in the books? You can’t use the excuse that Savile was alive because Heath was alive too.
I don’t give a flying dogfart about your mind challenged “protectors” who will make up ANY and ALL excuses for you. There is NO excuse.
Further, Lou Collins, like any other of the alternative media people who will interview Icke will not (and did not) question him on any of his assertions. Why? Is he the man that shall not be questioned? Question anyone and everyone else in mainstream and alternative but NEVER question this schmuck? Is he the “Godfather” of the alternative media or something? You ALL lick the bastard’s ass!
But this is a good time to include one last point. In an earlier blog of mine – before I had even heard of Sonia Poulton (which having now heard her I wish I hadn’t – my ears bleed for one thing) – I actually “thanked” her for covering a certain topic and here it is (taken from my blog re “Tony Blair, D notices, Princes, Popes, Politicians, “Pop pickers”, MI5, AND PAEDOPHILIA!”:
Dated October 28th 2012. So we can readily assume there was already significant contact between Icke and Poulton at this point (or is it just a synchronistic coincidence?).
Note: Poulton makes the following assertion on behalf of David Icke – “Savile’s BBC colleague David Icke, who went from respected broadcaster to laughing stock, was at the forefront of such claims in the Nineties when he named Savile and others as paedophiles.”
Ok Ms Poulton, NOW show us your journalistic integrity which, I have to assume, had you do due diligence on such an assertion and that you checked exactly when and through which media David Icke made these allegations regarding Savile at that time. Which book, press media or other broadcast media did Icke use for this and exactly when?
If you are unable to provide this then it proves two things: He never did claim such and YOU did not check your source(s).
Are YOU a repeater also Ms Poulton? A repeater of someone who then just so happened to become your paymaster less than a year later.
Or is this all just conspiracy theory on my part?
Whatever your answer, tell it to your faithful because it just doesn’t wash anywhere else.
So while that “paedophile infested establishment and its servile media sought to hold the line at Savile’s own abuse of young girls…” so, in fact, did David Icke because he did not expose Savile in ANY of his books from “The Biggest Secret” up until Savile’s exposure by the mainstream. WOW! Isn’t he ahead of the curve?
So unless PROOF to the contrary is forthcoming, we either take it that David Icke kept mum on Savile just as everyone else did OR David Icke knew nothing about it. His choice. I wonder which one he will make?
One final thing on Ms Poulton: If she has, as she claims, lists of pedophiles and, as she says, some may be alleged by people on the bandwagon but she seems to know there are some that are definites, then why is she not releasing the names? After all, TPV just had a mad barrister on the other day who did say something correct for once: If you are telling the truth and have facts on your side, releasing the names CANNOT be against the law. He then went on to say he couldn’t release names himself because the suspects were still alive – thereby, totally contradicting himself (as all of these so called “truthers” tend to do – even mainstream “real journalists” it would seem) but what do you expect from a pompous self serving, barrister who holds himself in such high esteem and believes the “gerries” are still out to get us?
Jesus Christ! This alternative media is a bigger joke than the mainstream!
David Icke: A shorty short one!
THE NODDING DOG SYNDROME!
Only one very big ass licker can achieve this and the 2013 Nodding dog award goes to…. drum roll…. Richie Allen!!
Just watching the dot connector (no Icke doesn’t have a show – he doesn’t want one! lol) and for every guest Richie Allen has, he questions them and interrupts them BUT, in this, he sits there passively and NEVER interrupts “the boss”. But David has NO say over anything right Richie? You’re an ass licking prick!
You see MY problem is in life that ass lickers literally make me wanna puke. THIS guy is a PERFECT example of one.
Watch him. It’s sickly. You see, if I was sitting in a meeting with this guy (or any of these people) my sheer contempt for them – albeit not expressed (I would try to suppress it for a certain amount of time) would be sensed through the “vibrations” I sent to them.
It would very quickly get to the point of me having to say to Richie though: “You lick ass damned well mate, how DO you do it?”
He’d reply (if he was honest): “I know who pays my wages”.
ASS LICKER!
PS: So Richie, nothing is solid therefore Icke is saying that mass does not exist – he’s a hologram as are you and everything else – so then I dare you you ass licker to ask the man ANY question. Here’s an example: “If there is no solidity and therefore no mass (there IS no solid you) then you’re saying Einstein was wrong. What you are, in fact, trying to impress on your gullible, desperate audience is that not only are you Socrates and the son of the godhead but you are intellectually superior to Albert Einstein who said “E=MC²”. In that formula, there is something called mass which you say does not exist. This would leave E=C². Please do us a favour oh great Socrates and derive the formula E=C² from first principles. This derivation is then proof of what you say and you are, obviously, immensely qualified to derive such. Or is the answer, in fact E=E because, just as mass is an illusion then so is C (the speed of light). Well you couldn’t be wrong saying E=E because Energy does equal energy there’s no argument about that.”
The thing is Ickey is that if E just simply equals E then we are all one energy (as you try to suggest we are in a way but then you call it consciousness). Well if we’re all one energy then these reptilians (who you say are just energy) are feeding off themselves. It’s like saying a water droplet in the ocean is feeding off all the other water droplets. You seriously are an asshole! There can BE no “predators” if everything is purely energy. Oh GOD man your BULLSHIT (and your own no real idea of what you are saying as it is puked out of your facial orifice – but should be emanating from your backend orifice) is dross of the nth degree.
David Icke: Problem, reaction, solution
“What they do to get people on their side to support their cause is they “attack” themselves or create the belief of there being such an attack, thereby stimulating the people into supporting and rallying around the “flag””
Problem(s): TPV having massive credibility problems while also outputting really poor content and having one technical hitch after another. Meanwhile, not getting the level of donations that they want.
Reaction: Create a false flag “attack” on the station and DI website thereby getting people like Charlotte Hughes’ reaction and improving your credibility through their naivety.
Solution: “They’re attacking us because we’re scaring them. We’re having an effect. If you want to continue scaring them, then donate!”
But David will say that what one says about someone else is more to do with what the one saying would do. Strangely, David has spoken about others setting up false flag events (and it’s fact) for years now. By him saying it however, does that mean he is speaking of himself?
Dave: You’re an idiot. Only the non discerning will take every word you say as that of a man pursuing truth rather than profit.
Almost every word you utter David can be turned against you. Now why would that be do you think? My attacks on you have not been based upon what I would do. They have been based upon reported and researched facts about what you have done!
Further, when it comes to profit, I’m no simpleton David. Profit comes in all forms and you have sufficient income form your books that you do not need to take a salary or profit at this point in time (and for some time to come) from TPV BUT, contrary to your statement about TPV being “Non profit” and “there are no shares” – you’re a liar David. That’s not an allegation, it is a fact: TPV is a Private Limited company with SHARE capital.
Now, I just watched part of an interview with Lilou someone or other just from Saturday 7th December. In it you make the statement (as you have before) that “If a pharmaceutical company (etc) came along and offered a billion for TPV, I’d tell them to……” whatever. The Private Limited Company with SHARE capital then, is once more exposed by that statement (not that it needs be exposed because a fact is a fact). You resigned your Directorship in TPV David. You, on the face of it, have no say as to what TPV would or would not do then. Ah! but that WOULD be true if not for the fact that it is a Private Limited Company with SHARE capital and you are, without a doubt from what you say here, the majority shareholder.
And one day in the future……. 🙂
David Icke: TPV triple XXX
Funnier and funnier: But we’ve got to give ‘the people” a voice (all walks of life). Sure, do that. I don’t disagree. But what you’re doing TPV is playing to your audience, that’s all. Your audience are “The Sun” and “The Mirror” readers while you know that Nathalie Rowe and pornstars are going to capture the attention of those readers. They love scandal so if you can mix scandal with conspiracy well…. sex sells. Good lad David. You’re stupid but you ain’t THAT stupid. Decadence is what it truly is all about after all. This isn’t about giving this girl a voice. It’s about audience titillation.
And I thought I’d finished with blogs about TPV and Icke but they just keep dishing up more transparent shit to point to.
If you think, as a “thinking” and “awake” human that a porn star has any valid opinion to present to you regarding what you suggest it is you are all trying to achieve, then you must be a raving lunatic or so full of BS. I can see all you male (and female) porn lovers rushing up to Wembley with the mindset there’s a chance of giving her a conspiratorial gang bang post interview! 🙂 Or, perhaps, just a question and answer bukkake session:
“Did Osama Bin Laden and buddies do 9/11?”
“Yes”
“Wrong. Ok next facial!”
“Who carried out 7/7?”
“A bunch of muslims who caught the wrong train”
“Wrong again, next facial please!”
She’ll probably get all the answers wrong on purpose of course! 🙂
Then again, perhaps Sapphire is a part-time psychic and is coming on the show to read people’s semen stains once they land on her face. Who knows? Perhaps she connects with the DNA and can read sperm once it lands on her nose, lips and eyes. Does she charge for the service I wonder?
So, ok TPV, get a balance to the debate. Invite “Jenna Presley” and Monica Foster on the show too. Don’t have Sean interviewing though or anywhere near them. He might tweet he just met a bunch of slags and ex slags after all and we could’t have that could we? Will the studio be filled with the smell of fish too? Ah but you won’t want to hear from those two will you? After all, they’re not pagans, they’re christians. But they’re speaking about the satnic porn industry. I thought you were against satanism David? I guess only to an extent: It’s bad when it’s using and abusing children but ok otherwise right? Even though it is clear that 18 yr olds through to even their 30s really don’t understand the world around them. You’re a nasty freak Icke. You’re a capitalising bastard of the worst kind in my view.
What you are doing Icke is precisely what you’re doing re the externalisation of the occult nature of Blavatsky’s and Alice Bailey’s teachings. You say the info can be used for good or bad but that is total bullshit Icke and you know it. The sheer action of bringing it into the public consciousness is to give it validity. You are doing the same with porn. From Tatchell’s beliefs to now, a porn star on the show. Don’t get me wrong, I’m no prude. I’ve been there, done it, got the t-shirt mate but, through having done so, I recognise the sheer emptiness of it all. But that takes experience and, yes, along with experience, age. Your shout out for the Banned and its decadence and looking for people who look as though they know how to party, is all wrapped up in this. You’re doing the very job the people you say you are against, want done.
You’re helping it all along – destroying the family. YOU’RE A FUCKING JERK!
The Pornographic Conspiracy:
“Destroy the family and you destroy society”
You piece of human filth! Yes you’re pushing boundaries alright. I just hope to god you’re thick audience can recognise where you’re pushing them to!
How long do you think this freedom of speech will last?….
David Icke: Is TPV breaking the law?
Following on from a comment on my last blog. The law regarding Internships is that the intern must be paid. Is this journalist that David Icke “synchronistically” stumbled upon being paid?
Mr Baker said that interns should know their rights.
“Companies are taking advantage of the fact that there is a high level of graduate unemployment and we advise people to know there rights. They have a right to claim money even if they have finished working with a company,” Baker added.
The National Union of Journalists, which has run a campaign against exploitative unpaid work, gave us a statement from the NUJ’s general secretary, Michelle Stanistreet: “This practice continues to exploit dreams and exclude new talent, undermining the diversity of our profession, just when we should be nurturing and supporting the people coming into the industry. Employers in the media should be warned; we will continue to take on those who seek to exploit young people and new comers to the industry.”
Furthermore, are the likes of Deanna Amato and Elissa Hawke being paid? And, if they are, do they hold the correct visas (working visas) to be paid? If they are not being paid then how do they possibly live while working for the People’s Voice?
These are BIG questions folks because you have no idea how, in fact, your donations are being used. If you’re simply not interested, while you throw money at a Private Limited Company run by a guy you have no idea about (Sean ADL Tabatabai) then, frankly, you’re incredibly stupid.
From “we need £300K to pay for all the cost of the amazing equipment we need to buy” to “Well it cost us £20K” and everything else which this patently amateurish set up has had you swallow in the name of “truth” while they use your money but don’t allow transparency of how that Private Limited Company is using it – and now they’re thanking you all for further donations? Somehow I doubt that suddenly they are receiving a mass of donations since Icke’s begging video. I believe (and it is just my belief) that they already have funding which will keep them running but they have to make out that they are suddenly receiving a great influx of donations from you – again, let’s see the books Icke! Or should I say Tabatabai? – plus they don’t pay expenses for volunteers but pay an inner core of people. WHO is getting paid by you and how much? It’s YOUR money folks! How many of you are out of a job?
How STUPID are you?
David Icke: Funding the People’s Voice
He’s not looking too happy is he?
Well David, let’s just lay it on the line shall we? You told your audience you needed £300K for the top of the range equipment. You led them to believe that is how much, at a minimum, was required (where we know it requires £millions). BUT you always knew you were getting the kit for £20K. That £20K, by the way, could have been paid out of YOUR own pocket for YOUR own television network venture because David Icke books has that much cash in the bank then some. But you chose to use other people’s money (therefore, calling it “The People’s Voice) when you needn’t have. You would have kept the £20K a secret too but some of us didn’t let you. You also told your audience – the people who funded you- that you would be free of control. No regulation, no OFCOM, and yet what do we have? Moments later TPV applying for an OFCOM licence and David Icke not walking his talk. And you expect people to continue funding someone who’s misled them on two very large counts?
But you know David? If I’m right – and this is just speculation on my part – I think you’ll probably come through in the end because I still have a sneaky suspicion that there’s money coming from elsewhere which you haven’t told your audience about. Why do i believe that? Because people like Sonia Poulton moved house for the sake of TPV and, therefore, she must have got a promise and guarantee from somewhere (unless, of course, she is a very gullible and trusting, naive soul and I sort of doubt that).
The further thing is this: You originally said £100K would be enough to get you on air. Well you’re JUST “on air” a couple of weeks max (and by the way, sorry but it is a joke – the amateurism is pathetic and Alex Jones must be pissing himself at your attempt – he, at least, has a polish of professionalism with less resource than you do) and you got £300K. Where has £280K gone David?
Listen mate. Don’t kid a kidder. People don’t invest their time, energy and even other people’s money in a venture that they think, for one moment, could collapse within a month or two of starting. It just doesn’t happen Ickey. Unless, that is, you are a total, incompetent. Make your choice Dave.
The people are also probably thinking to themselves “Wait a second, we’ve already given you £300K for nothing” and what do they get? Pure amateurism, poor/shit sets and find out the kit cost £20K. Further, you’re actually biased in your programming and all you’re doing is wheeling on the same old names propagating the same old shit.
It could have been all so much more professional David but it isn’t. Do you know what you’re doing as you beg for more money and make people feel guilty?
You’ve shown your true self Dave. I told you people would get pissed off when they saw the real David icke mate and it seems they have.
Just one last thing: What have your reporters and researchers worked on so far because there has been absolutely nothing new (except your reading of mainstream media papers) come out of your station and do you think people need you to read the papers for them these days?
WHAT DO YOU OFFER DAVID? NOTHING!
It’s also interesting that Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars mentioned an idea by Alex Jones to have an Infowars UK branch just in the last few days. Plus Alex didn’t appear on your launch show to congratulate you. Interesting omission I thought.
Oh and a final final thing: Dave, what are YOU doing begging for money for the People’s Voice for? You also use the term “we”, thereby including yourself in the “we”. David, you are not part of The People’s Voice. You started it with Sean and then you resigned (your audience wonder why but you don’t feel it’s necessary to tell them and be transparent with the people who funded it). So, having nothing to do with the Private Limited Company (WHICH, by the way, is NOT a “Not for profit” company at all – yes you heard it first here. Another lot of bull David is feeding you) and Sean being the only Director of the company; Don’t you think it should be Sean on screen begging for money from the population? It’s his business after all isn’t it? The entire business being controlled and run by a nobody who hates christianity and thinks women smell like fish and are slags. Hmmm…. perhaps not the best face to put in front of the people you want to fund you then right? But what are you getting from it Dave? Why are you so pissed off about it? Oh and PLEASE don’t give me this shit about it being for the benefit of all mankind. Most people just ain’t as gullible as you think.
Fund it properly Dave or piss off. People have enough on their plate at the moment but then religions prey on the poor too. Just a pound a month from the congregation and look at the jewels and the property and the gold and the money that the catholic church has. They wouldn’t have that wealth if it wasn’t for the naivety and trust of simple people giving their last cents in desperation. And that is what you expected to tap into too. But you see, the very thing you want – the destruction of all religions – is what is happening in this country mate. People don’t like being used and abused by religions in this country. You still have a potential source to tap in America though – they’re still gullible and pay their televangelists but we’ve never really had that as part of our culture and it’s doubtful that we’d start now. Now had we still had people of faith and people wanting a church, a religion, you just MAY have gotten your donations ongoing from the faithful but, ironically once more, the very thing you preach against removes the very mindset which you need to tap into. It’s really quite humorous and entertaining Dave. 😉
THE BANNED! (How ironic, once more).
TPV: “Our ethos is to allow EVERYONE’S opinions!”
Is it?
A guy I know called Mark decided to state his opinions on the TPV Facebook page. He was good enough to pass the comments to me and asked me why, considering the “non censorship” ethos and “we must allow everyone to have a voice even those who disagree with us”, The People’s Voice would censor him and ban him from making further comments. Yes, they happened to criticise but is that not what this “openness” is meant to be all about? He didn’t swear or curse; he stated issues relating to the presenter and her guests and how he simply felt that a good enough job was simply not being done. He did advise me personally, that he thought the entire thing was amateurish and total crap and thought he could probably do a better job sitting on his toilet with a camcorder facing him (from the waist up), but he didn’t actually say that on the FB page. He simply criticised (as any critic would and, certainly in the msm which, David Icke himself actually links to regarding the Mirror article on the death of the young boy). So what is it about Mark’s comments which were so outrageous that TPV felt they had to ban him from any further comment?
He did not post any links to my blog so it can’t be that. He replied to any and all comments/replies to his posts with respect. So what do you think TPV were so scared of huh? He was even getting flak from their supporters so then he was disallowed from responding. The posts are still there but Mark’s ability to post anymore or reply to comments has been removed.
Everyone’s opinions? No censorship? Doesn’t appear that way to me.
Here are Mark’s posts. You’ll note at the time of posting, he also had a comment section to reply to. Later, his ability to comment (and post) has been entirely removed.
The first 3 pics are taken just after he posted (within minutes) showing he clearly had access to comment. The next 3 pics are then taken 3 or 4 hours later. The posts themselves still exist but, unknown to the other posters and commenters, Mark cannot now reply to them. It’s like “disappearing” someone and allowing those who have debated with him to feel that they have “won” something. It’s brilliantly done. It doesn’t look like censorship by TPV it just looks as if Mark decided not to comment further. The posts will be forgotten and, going forward, there is no further criticism to handle. “We don’t censor” say TPV! lol
Mark even made the conscious decision not to promote Earthling’s blog. He wanted to speak for himself rather than have people think he was speaking Earthling’s words. Yet, even though this blog was not promoted in any way or even referred to, TPV felt they had to shut Mark up. 😉
Again, it appears, quite spectacularly, that this organisation does not walk its talk and that dissent of any kind is unwanted and will be dealt with.
David, Sean, Sonia: You’re scared shitless of someone that can see right through you!
David Icke: The British Government happy to licence subversive broadcast content against themselves.
So, finally, OFCOM respond (with more to come I expect).
The British Government’s FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT written so extremely well to ensure that they don’t have to answer to you. You must vote for the government (of whatever colour) because “You the people live in a democracy”. But recognise this: YOU are NOT the “Public” and you never have been! I’ve known this for a long time but people appear unwilling or unable to acknowledge that which is in front of their face.
You vote for a controlled and regulated/licensed handful of “different” parties but not one of these parties (even the BNP or UKIP) would be allowed to operate as a political party unless they played by the rules laid down by the real powers. Every MP who takes a seat must swear an oath of allegiance. Who to do you think? Now given that Mr Icke is consistently undermining that very monarchy with his fables; If they took him as a serious threat, do you think for one moment they would give him a licence to “kill” (them)? Don’t be so BLOODY NAIVE!
Now let’s look at this response – although there isn’t much to look at. Well what’s new?
1. What IS “The public”? Because YOU are not IT!
“The people’s voice is not funded by the public in statutory terms”. I just LOVE this! Once again, the British government show their hand. “Statutory”. “In the public interest” once more shown to be the doublespeak which it is. “The public” is not you! “Private donations” is used, when it suits them, to suggest you are not a part of “the public”.
Now consider this VERY carefully: IF you are a private individual – which you are when you are donating your own funds (from what is essentially your bank account) – then you are NOT considered a part of the public. Ok? Are you with me so far? Good.
So then, really let this penny drop folks: The government is then removing your private funds through taxes to fund a “public” which is not you and you are not a part of. Let that thought linger in your head and consider it wisely. Imagine a lake and someone comes along with thousands upon thousands of buckets and removes the water and all that water is sitting in buckets on the land – individual buckets of water. Could any one of those buckets of water say “I am the lake”? (Think about that when you think about the control of our water supply by water companies too). So by statutorily differentiating between a lake and a bucket of water, they legally claim that the bucket of water has no say in relation to the lake. The problem is that, once they decide that you are a private person then, by default, the public no longer exists! And yet, you are to FUND the public! A non existent entity. It is theft. Wonderfully achieved I must say.
Let’s revisit the response from Julia Snape of the 24th October:
“… and does not require a public interest test”.
But I may say it does or you may say it does or we (however many “we” are) say it does but it doesn’t matter because neither you, nor I, nor we are “The public”. So WHO is “The public”? WE are considered private individuals when their STATUTORY legislation suits them. Now let’s go a little further into the “mindfuck” here:
If we are all private individuals and not the public, then why is it that the government then speaks about “members of the public” and that we all have a “public duty” to pay our taxes. A PUBLIC duty is a duty by members of the public! Yet we are not the public but private individuals. What they will argue is that, as a whole, we are the public. Now how would they know what is in the “public interest” without asking each and every member/individual who comprises the public, for their opinion on an issue? They don’t and never intend to. They obscure this by saying that, as a public (an electorate) we vote for our representatives who then speak on our behalf. However, when we speak with “our” representatives, they have no intention of speaking on our behalf and are whipped by the party whip to follow the party line.
Anyhow, I think you see the joke in all of this by now. You can be sure Julia is being paid too much to even think of it. And that is the control in a nutshell. Nothing to do with Lizards, just absolute corruption of a system. Systemic corruption.
2. “The People’s Voice has applied for and been granted a licence….”. Just note here it does not say “David Icke has applied for and been granted a licence…”. Note to all those Icke and TPV aficionados: You know all about the Corporate Person and yet your messiah and OFCOM are working hand in hand using the Corporate Person to evade the entire point. That being that David Icke – who is, YOU believe, attacking the very establishment giving him the licence – is being allowed to do so by using the very vehicle which the establishment has constructed. That is the Corporate Person of “The People’s Voice” which would not even exist if the establishment did not allow it to by granting it a Corporate Personhood! Having done so, it is also allowing that very corporate person to broadcast using one of its licences while knowing full well who and what David Icke is all about.
Bottom line: He is no threat so you’re all wasting you time, energy and hope, OR, alternatively, they know exactly where he is going and are happy for him to have you follow him. Two choices, take your pick because there is not a third one however much you may wish there to be. Just face it, you’re a gullible twat! 🙂
3. In responding that “The people’s Voice is not funded by the public…” it is clearly a disingenuous reply to what they fully understand the issue to be. Note also Julia’s reference to The People’s Voice website stating it is funded by private donations. Therefore, I can rest assured that, having not donated, that channel does not speak for me. So no matter how many times David Icke and his motley crew preach they are a voice of “the people” (which you would all consider to be “the public”), they are not. What is sad is that you who have donated think you are the people they are speaking for. However, they speak for you neither. They speak for themselves and their agenda and you are not allowed to question their agenda otherwise you are banned. “The Banned” are for those who wish to join the Icke club but it’s still very much a club and no matter how much you think you’re in it, you ain’t in it!
4. Regarding her answer to question 4. It, in fact, does confer a status on the business itself. That status is that of a Private Corporate Person. Meaning, if you have no share or interest (STATUTORILY) in it, then you literally have no say and no right to information about it. The Communications Act then enforces that right for the Corporate Person to have its privacy protected under the act. They can evade as much as they wish but that is actual fact of the matter. So while you cannot pierce the corporate veil (and Icke and Tabatabai know this), you have NO say and no control over anything they choose to do. It is NOT and never shall be your voice. As an example, Peter Tatchell appearing. What did TPV do? They spun their own dictate to you. It was very well put I must give them credit for that, but it was nevertheless a dictate: “We shall give everyone a voice”. Yes it makes great sense on one hand but, again, sit back and really consider how that plays out. They will give everyone a voice no matter what? How is it, then, that anyone and everyone who asks the questions I am asking or who posts my blogs on Icke or TPV’s sites, are then “dealt with”? How is it that such free speech is removed and deleted? They suggest they will give a voice to all sides about all subjects UNLESS the very subject is David Icke and TPV. Had Peter Tatchell come on the show and said what I’ve been saying he’d be cut out of the broadcast but no, he talks plainly in his own writings over the years displaying he’s supportive of paedophilia and that’s ok. Anything goes on Icke’s show except Icke. Further, Gareth states he will have to allow mainstream artists on his show too (and you’ll all agree with him and love to see them on because you think it will be promoting the kudos of the station). Again, his reasoning sounds like sense but, once more, sit back and consider all the angles. They have and they’ve done it well. What better for the channel than to get the mainstream people to embrace it? But then where does that leave you? You STILL love celebrity don’t you? And that is what they play on and by playing on it they will build that Private Limited Company at your expense.
5. “This exemption does not infer approval by OFCOM on the activities of that business”. Of COURSE it does! It could not be exempt in the first place if OFCOM had not approved the company as fit and proper! An incredibly disingenuous and evasive statement to make. Are you beginning to recognise the sheer arrogance, audacity and deception of these people?
6. Lastly: “The content broadcast by all licensees must COMPLY with the Ofcom Broadcasting code”. Hey David, Where’s your dance? Isn’t it more like “How high do you wish me to jump your worship?”
You’re hilarious mate you truly are!
Meanwhile what do we have from Richie Allen on his FB page?
Jonathan Cloono: Will the channel be on sky, freesat or free view (1 November at 16:15 via mobile)
Richie Allen: we were originally going to be an online service exclusively, but we’ve had an offer (which we are considering) to go on freest. (1 November at 18:11)
But, again, it’s bizarre. The Ickolytes will applaud this and get excited by the idea that it may be on terrestrial TV (which was ALWAYS the intention as Gareth Icke suggested in his little interview piece) and why David Icke and TPV always had the intention to get a licence (this is about business and such a business needs audience figures). Yet, Freesat is owned by the BBC and ITV.
THEY ARE ALREADY SELLING OUT (even to consider this is to display the willingness to sell out. What did Icke say about not accepting sponsorship from Monsanto yet he will consider launching the channel on a platform owned by the BBC!)
Freesat is a free-to-air digital satellite television joint venture between the BBC and ITV plc, serving the United Kingdom. The service was formed as a memorandum in 2007 and has been marketed since 6 May 2008.
Or is Richie talking about the SKY version of Freesat? If he is he should be a little more specific but anyhow..
So ask yourself a simple question: David Icke stated time and again that TPV would be free of all regulation right? He was launching the channel on the internet for that very reason he said. No licence was or would be needed so as to allow them to be free to broadcast what and how they wished. As Gareth said “No rules, who needs rules”. HOW, then could Gareth state that his show would eventually (therefore pre-planned) be broadcast on SKY? He would and will need a licence for that. That is why, ladies and gentlemen, I have said, from the very start of my postings on the subject of David Icke and TPV, that they already either had a licence, were applying for one or had every intention of getting one. These people aren’t too smart you know. They give themselves away at every turn.
Meanwhile, SKY just happens to have a Rothschild on its board. Deal with that one David!
“The changes were overseen by Nicholas Ferguson, Sky’s Senior Independent Non-Executive Director, working in close consultation with Lord Rothschild, Deputy Chairman, and Lord Wilson of Dinton, Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, and were approved unanimously by the Board.”
http://corporate.sky.com/rns.aspx?PID=57d76ad4e9334d0698f0d5556fdbc60b
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=7685243&ticker=RCP:LN
Please review Icke’s own words once more. Honestly, you can’t make shit like this up. From 9.36 onwards.
It blows my mind how gullible the Ickolytes really are as they talk about being awake and aware. It’s just incredible to me. And they wonder why I would consider them imbeciles? Of course you can never win an argument with an imbecile. Did you know that?
DAVID ICKE: TPV (THE DIRECTOR’S “CUT”)
MAN CREATES CORPORATE PERSON.
MAN BECOMES DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE PERSON.
MAN TERMINATES HIS DIRECTORSHIP OF CORPORATE (LEGAL FICTION) PERSON.
THIS IS TPV – THE DIRECTOR’S CUT!
The Grand media chessboard: King replaced by Bishop. Now pay your “tithes” to the Bishop!
Company founded 17th May 2013.
Two Directors appointed 21st May 2013.
David Icke fans throw over £300K of donations at company in their trust of David Icke, the Director. Free money, just like Quantatitive Easing, on the recognition of a “trust” – for that is what it is. The trust formed being that between David Icke and the people – the latter believing he will use that money in their best interests to buy all the equipment necessary to launch a TV internet channel and offer them a voice.
TPV, then, is launched and the people ignore the fact that the equipment was bought for just £20K.
Meanwhile, a twat called “Earthling” contacts OFCOM because he can’t quite figure out how David Icke is telling his entire audience that no regulatory licence is needed when even he, Earthling – not involved in media at all – can see just with a quick 5 minutes spent on google, that any tv style programming, even broadcast over internet, requires a licence by OFCOM/AVMS.
Contact made with OFCOM
From: Earthling
Sent: 08 October 2013 14:55
To: TV Licensing
Subject: Content licensing
Dear sirs,
I am trying to understand the following from your information on the Ofcom website. Can you please tell me if it is necessary to apply for a content license, or any license, from Ofcom if one intends to set up an internet based broadcasting service from the UK with live news channels and others on a 24/7 live broadcast basis?
In other words, does Ofcom regulate such broadcasting in any shape or form?
Thank you,
From: TV.Licensing@ofcom.org.uk
To: Earthling
Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:29:12 +0000
Yes.
Services which are broadcast from the UK via the internet are licensable. This is set out in the notes of guidance for applicants and reflects the requirement of the Audio Visual Media Services Directive.
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/guidance_notes_and_apps/
From: Earthling
To: tv.licensing@ofcom.org.uk
Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:01:09 +0000
Thank you.
I assume, therefore, you are aware of the internet TV station due for launch on the 18th November by the name of “The People’s Voice”?
Can you please confirm that this channel, run by David Icke, has applied for and been granted such licensing? It is being run as a “not for profit” enterprise, so we are led to believe (if it is not licensed as such by the appropriate authority, I would consider this to be a fraudulent claim) and Mr Icke has consistently expressed that there is no need to come under the auspices of OFCOM since he is broadcasting over internet. I believe he is incorrect from what you have just replied and I don’t consider that Mr Icke would not already be fully aware of the need to apply and be granted such a license.
Please treat this as a Freedom of Information Act request regarding a promoted “Not for profit” organisation requiring licensing, like any other, from OFCOM.
I presume there is no difficulty in responding to such a request for information. After all, you have just expressly stated that such a undertaking as Mr Icke is taking, requires a content license. I simply wish to ensure that such has been applied for and accepted.
Thank you.
Ofcom’s reply:
From: Earthling
Sent: 24 October 2013 17:49
To: Julia Snape
Subject: RE: The Peoples Voice 1-245308060
Dear Julia,
Thank you for your confirmation that you have not issued a licence to “The People’s Voice” as of today. Having originally contacted Ofcom about the need for such a CONTENT licence for internet based broadcasting, I was advised as below:
Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:29:12 +0000
Yes.
Services which are broadcast from the UK via the internet are licensable. This is set out in the notes of guidance for applicants and reflects the requirement of the Audio Visual Media Services Directive.
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/tvlicensing/guidance_notes_and_apps/
Therefore, my follow up questions are as follows:
1. I must assume, therefore, that if such an organisation has not been issued with a licence by the time of commencing broadcasting, that they shall be in breach of the statutory requirements in such an instance? This is a general question relating to any and all broadcasters and potential broadcasters of internet content. If this assumption is incorrect, can you advise me of the specific situations in which a broadcaster need not apply for and be granted a licence by OFCOM (or ATVOD)?
2. Specifically, is it necessary that “The People’s Voice” DOES have a licence (content licence) to broadcast? According to the reply above, this is the case. Is the reply correct?
3. Further, I would wish to add this: “The People’s Voice” is, as can be clearly evidenced by the continuing requests for donations by the public and the continuing promotion of the station as being “The People’s” station, suggesting it is purely being set up and broadcast FOR the “public interest”. It is the public funding it (unless I am mistaken – which is very probable in my opinion although that is not what is being “sold” TO the public). If, then, it promotes its entire raison d’être as being “in the public interest” then it is not, at all, in the public interest that they do not know and have no way of knowing whether the public’ interest is being served by the station/company (a Private Limited Company suggesting it is non profit) complying with the statutory requirements. If the public is not allowed such information then it is a clear indication that the company is acting in a private and non transparent manner and that OFCOM and present legislation is enabling such.
How, then, can it be stated that it not require a “public interest test” to provide this information for a broadcast network funded by the public? Please answer this question for me very logically.
4. Having read section 393(1) of the Communications Act, it does occur to me that for, as you say, the information to be “classified” (for that is what this is – classified and not available to the public), the “business” must have been granted a provision to operate under that act for the protection of section 393(1) to come into force. Am I correct?
393General restrictions on disclosure of information
(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, information with respect to a particular business which has been obtained in exercise of a power conferred by—
(a)this Act,
(b)the enactments relating to the management of the radio spectrum (so far as not contained in this Act),
(c)the 1990 Act, or
(d)the 1996 Act,
is not, so long as that business continues to be carried on, to be disclosed without the consent of the person for the time being carrying on that business.
So, a legislative body related to government must have given approval for “The People’s Voice” (or ANY such broadcaster) to operate under the terms of the Communications Act 2003. Again, Am I correct?
5. To be given such approval and be protected from the need to divulge such information relating to whether or not the business has a licence to operate under OFCOM, obviously then suggests that the British government are entirely approving of the expected content from such a broadcaster. Am I correct?
Please note, the above questions (4 and 5) are logical and can be answered in a general form. There is absolutely no justification for not replying to these questions in a general form then.
6. Inasmuch as you, personally, will have the knowledge of whether the station is abiding by the statutory requirements then, in your capacity as an OFCOM employee (and one, therefore, who must abide by statutory legislation as you are doing now by not divulging what is written within the Acts) please state/confirm that you, in your capacity, would, and will, flag the noncompliance of any and all broadcasters who require a licence from you (or ATVOD). This may be treated as a freedom of information act request questioning a Freedom of Information Act officer. My guess is that, as such, such an officer would have to be transparent and factual in their reply (unless the FOI Act also gives some form of “pass” for that also?).
Thank you and regards,
Thank you for your further comments and questions regarding this matter. I will come back to you again in due course once we have considered the points you have made.
Kind regards
Julia
|
Published on 5 Dec 2012 http://www.davidicke.com http://www.davidicke.com/articles/chi… Music “Jimmy Jangle” Braaayks Unskippable
00:09:13
Added on 07/03/2013
1,076 views
|
 |
Determining who should hold the licence
52. Ofcom has published guidance about who we regard as the person who is the provider of a broadcasting (i.e. TV and radio) service and should therefore hold a broadcasting licence to provide the service. Generally, the provider of the service is the person who is in a position to determine what is to be included in the service or, in the words of the Communications Act 2003, the person “with general control over which programmes and other services and facilities are comprised in the service (whether or not he has control of the content of individual programmes or of the broadcasting or distribution of the service)”.
Disqualification for Holding Licences
General disqualification of non-EEC nationals and bodies having political connections
1(1)Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the following persons are disqualified persons in relation to a licence granted by the Commission or the Authority:
(d)a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of a political nature;
(e)a body affiliated to a body falling within paragraph (d);
(f)an individual who is an officer of a body falling within paragraph (d) or (e);
a body corporate which is an associate of a body corporate falling within paragraph (d) or (e)
The above states quite clearly “of a political nature”. Politics is defined in the Oxford English dictionary as follows:
noun
Politics is not confined to purely political parties, as I am sure you are aware, but stretches across fundamental philosophy, belief systems, capitalism/communism etc and, also, subversive activities.
15. Applicants with religious objects are advised to allow approximately eight weeks for their application to be considered by Ofcom in the light of the Guidance for religious bodies applying for a Broadcasting Act licence (http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/tv-broadcast-licences/other-issues/religious- guidance). Applicants should be aware that Ofcom is under a duty to ensure that it does not license bodies with objects which are of a wholly or mainly political nature, and will consider applications carefully in the light of its duties. Applications where questions arise in relation to this issue may take a number of months to consider.
From “The Biggest Secret”
“Advancing the Agenda becomes their indoctrinated mission from very early in their lives. By the time their turn comes to join the Brotherhood hierarchy and carry the baton into the next generation, their upbringing has moulded them into highly imbalanced people. They are intellectually very sharp, but with a compassion bypass and an arrogance that they have the right to rule the world and control the ignorant masses who they view as inferior. Any Brotherhood children who threaten to challenge or reject that mould are pushed aside or dealt with in other ways to ensure that only ‘safe’ people make it to the upper levels of the pyramid and the highly secret and advanced knowledge that is held there. Some of these bloodlines can be named. The British House of Windsor is one of them, so are the Rothschilds, the European royalty and aristocracy, the Rockefellers, and the rest of the so-called Eastern Establishment of the United States which produces the American presidents, business leaders, bankers and administrators. But at the very top, the cabal which controls the human race operates from the shadows outside the public domain. Any group which is so imbalanced as to covet the complete control of the planet will be warring within itself as different factions seek the ultimate control. This is certainly true of the Brotherhood. There is tremendous internal strife, conflict and competition. One researcher described them as a gang of bank robbers who all agree on the job, but then argue over how the spoils will be divided. That is an excellent description and through history different factions have gone to war with each other for dominance. In the end, however, they are united in their desire to see the plan implemented and at the key moments they overwhelmingly join forces to advance the Agenda when it comes under challenge.”
“As I revealed in I Am Me I Am Free, and will elaborate upon in this book, the Brotherhood hierarchy today are seriously into Satanic ritual, child sacrifice, blood drinking and other abominations that would take your breath away. Yes, I am talking about some of the biggest royal, political, business, banking and media names on the planet. People like Henry Kissinger, George Bush, the British royal family and many other presidents, prime ministers and members of royalty. Fantastic? Of course it is, but since when did the truth not sound fantastic in a world of such denial and illusion?”
“….as represented by the orthodox rabbis today, makes it a religious offence to save the life of a Gentile, unless there would be unpleasant consequences for Jews not doing so. The charging of interest on loans to a fellow Jew is banned, but by Talmudic law they must charge a Gentile as much interest as they possibly can. It is demanded that Jews must utter a curse every time they pass a Gentile cemetery and that when they pass a Gentile building they must ask God to destroy it. Jews are forbidden to defraud each other, but that law does not apply to the defrauding of Gentiles. Jewish prayers bless God for not making them Gentiles and others ask that Christians may perish immediately. A religious Jew must not drink from a bottle of wine if a Gentile has touched it since it was opened. The Jewish writer, Agnon, after being awarded the Nobel Prize for literature, said on Israeli radio: “I am not forgetting that it is forbidden to praise Gentiles, but here there is a special reason for doing so – that is, they awarded the prize to a Jew.”17 These are the laws of the belief system called ‘Jewish’ which is constantly complaining about, and condemning, racism against Jews! The very belief system is founded on the most extreme racism you will ever encounter.”
“Add to that the fact that the truth of what is going on is so bizarre that most people will not believe it and you have the perfect situation for ongoing, unchallenged control.
Until now.”
So he’s challenging the entire system – that is his MO and he is being given a licence to operate a broadcasting network BY that system?
“Another version is Lilibet or Elizabeth and this is why the present British Queen is called Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth) and was known to her family circle as Lilibet. She is a major reptilian gene carrier who produced a major reptilian full-blood called Prince Charles. Both are shape-shifting reptilians, a fact that will be supported by later evidence. So is the Queen Mother, formerly Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth) Bowes-Lyon.”
A FACT, he says. No suggestion. A fact!
“Sir Winston’s daughter-in-law, Pamela, married the American, Averell Harriman, one of the great Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century and much documented in .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Pamela Harriman, who had formerly been married to Winston’s son, Randolph, became very influential in the American Democratic Party and is widely named as the force behind Bill Clinton’s election as US president. She was rewarded by being made US ambassador to the key Brotherhood city of Paris, where she died in 1997 at the age of 76. Her son, also named Winston, is a British member of Parliament who is close to the Rothschilds. Pamela Churchill-Harriman dated Elie de Rothschild before marrying Averell Harriman. In 1995 the Churchill family were given £12,500 million of National Lottery money when they sold some of Sir Winston Churchill’s Second World War speeches to ‘the nation’. The speeches were purchased with this public money by the National Heritage Memorial Board, chaired by… Lord Jacob Rothschild. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. The Churchill-Harrimans are bloodline families. One of Pamela Harriman’s ancestors conspired with the Percy family, ancestors of George Bush, in the attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament in the so-called Gun Powder Plot led by Guy Fawkes on November 5th 1605. As a Harriman, Pamela represented the ‘Democratic’ wing of the Brotherhood while the Bush’s, close associates and business partners of the Harrimans, represent the ‘Republican’ wing. Both have answered to the same master to ensure that the United States, like every other country, is a one-party-state. The Bush family are close friends of the Windsors, which shouldn’t surprise anyone who has read this far because both are shape-shifting reptilians. Bush and his associate, the Brotherhood’s tireless global manipulator, Henry Kissinger, have both been knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.”
“This is why I keep saying that London is the centre of the operational level of the Brotherhood. Even greater power lies elsewhere, some of it in the Vatican, and, ultimately, I think, on the physical level, somewhere under the ground in Tibet and Asia. The people of America have been bled dry by this scam and continue to be so. Land of the Free? What a joke! And, people of America, your presidents and leading government officials know this. In turn, it must be stressed, the King John agreement with the Pope presumably gave away the sovereignty of England, also. And who controlled King John? The Templars did.
When you know what you are looking for, the truth is in your face. I said that the Virginia Company and King James I decreed that criminal courts in the colonies would be controlled by Admiralty Law, the law of the sea. What Admiralty were they talking about? The British Admiralty, of course. When a court is being run under Admiralty or maritime law, the flag in the court has to have a gold fringe around it. Look in any criminal court in the United States or the united states and you will see it has a gold fringe. The same with many other official buildings. Those ‘American’ criminal courts are being run under BRITISH admiralty law. The Crown and the Brotherhood families of Britain also control the American criminal courts and the core of that control is with the secret societies based in Temple Bar in London, the former Templar lands, the centre of the British legal profession. The Grand Lodge of English Freemasonry is in Great Queen (Isis/Semiramis) Street in London and has controlled most Freemasonry across the globe since it was formed in 1717. Through this, the British reptile-Aryans control the American judges, lawyers, police, and so on, and through other organisations, like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, they manipulate the American political system. The American judges are fully aware that their courtrooms are controlled by British Admiralty Law, but they keep quiet and take the money. The Rockefeller family are the bloodline branch managers in America for the London headquarters and it is the Rockefellers who, quite provably, decide who is going to be President. In other words, the London Elite decide. The Queen of England, Prince Philip and the main members of the British royal family all know this and are helping to orchestrate it. Who is the Grand Master of the English Mother Lodge of Freemasonry? The Queen’s cousin, the Duke of Kent.”
OFCOM withdrew Press TV’s licence (for obvious reasons) plus OFCOM will either fine or withdraw the licence/ban any and all advertisements for products which are misleading in content and yet, you are allowing a person who promulgates the view that the British royal family are reptilian, shape shifters and part of a brotherhood of pedophiles and child murderers and you do not view these teachings and the asking of donations for a channel entirely controlled by this man, as “misleading”?
I am sorry but you have GOT to be kidding me!
Finally, let me be clear that I, personally, am aware and in agreement with much of what David Icke states regarding the actual facts and workings of the political and financial system. However, this man, through his own words and teachings is exceptionally dangerous in what he is trying to achieve and by which methods and beliefs.
Either OFCOM recognise the dangerous subversive (and substantial misleadings) of David Icke and reconsider this application for a licence you have already provided or you are clearly stating that you are supportive of the aims of David Icke.
I would like to know which.
I look forward to your imminent reply on the questions put to you in my previous email and would also wish to hear (even at a later date) your reply to this regarding the decision that David Icke is a “fit and proper person” to hold a UK broadcasting licence.
Regards,
OFCOM ARE DRAGGING THEIR FEET REGARDING THEIR REPLY TO THIS.
MEANWHILE:
BACK TO THE DIRECTOR’S CUT
What happened on the 23rd October 2013, just 5 months and 6 days into his Directorship? It would appear (I say appear and it is fact ON PAPER) that David Icke got sacked or resigned his position. What an interesting (and unexpected?) turn of events. Now WHY would the leading man, whom you all trust with your money, resign his position as Director and leaving Sean Tabatabai (the “Bishop”) as the ONLY remaining Director of “The People’s Voice Broadcasting Ltd” company?
Now, once more, check out the timing. It is precisely around the time David Icke states that contact was made with Ofcom and that fits precisely with the timing of my communications (thus far) with them. Oh I KNOW my communications with Ofcom created a stir because I have the words of Sonia Poulton, sent to me in confidence, to prove it. You have a very kind turn of phrase Ms Poulton you “old hag” (I’m simply repaying your “compliments” dear within a similar mould. It would generally not be a level I would stoop to but having read your comments, I see it is a level you do – wonderfully “enlightened” you are then and full of “love and light” for your fellow humans UNLESS they have questions that is right? They can and should question anyone and everyone except you it would seem – then the “claws” come out ;-)).
Two possible reasons:
1. OFCOM read their own regulations and recognised that they could not provide a Broadcast licence to THE PEOPLE’S VOICE BROADCASTING LIMITED with David Icke being the Director. The decision would not hold up to scrutiny given Icke’s political motivations (read the regulations and those who are disqualified from holding a licence).
2. The conflict of interest issue I wrote about in “David Icke: Sold to the highest buddha”.
However, no matter which (and it could be both) there are many questions surrounding this “chess move” by Icke and they are questions you should be VERY concerned about unless you simply have blind faith in the man. However, even having blind faith in the man, you STILL have a problem: David Icke is now NOT “the man” (at least on paper). It is not David Icke you are now sending your donations to -if you are and he is sending them on via his “David Icke Books Ltd” then that, in itself, is a legal issue. However, whatever is happening, the fact is that you are now sending your money to ONE MAN. A man called Sean ADL Tabatabai. The question is: Do you know him? Do you know ANYTHING about this guy (except that he works for David Icke). You were sending money to David Icke and now you’re not. David Icke is now a “volunteer” (haha) just like anyone else with the exception of the inner core.
So what the hell is going on eh? 😉 There is now ONE Director of THE PEOPLE’S VOICE and it’s Sean Tabatabai.
Yet do you think for ONE MOMENT that David Icke has seriously left the control of this entire enterprise to Sean Tabatabai? What is he? David Icke’s illegitimate son? Or is he something even darker than that? He’s a 31 year old guy – in my view not that bright but that’s just my impression – but he has something on a 60 odd yr old guy. Could a 31 yr old lad be a “handler” for David icke? Does David Icke NEED a “handler”?
Or is there another interested party in TPV which actually does have the total control over it? I wrote before about there being another couple of “People’s Voice” companies started within a month of your beloved one.
Now, it is possible that, to get the licence, Icke has resigned his Directorship and shall simply be re-instated once all the hoohah calms down. Yes that can be done. TPV can employ anyone they wish as a Director – it’s just at the point of application, if the main Director is a person who is deemed “not fit and proper” then that person (and TPV therefore) would not be given a licence.
Now do you think for one second that OFCOM wouldn’t know what was going on when they saw David Icke terminate himself and yet the company STILL apply for the licence? Do you think for one second they would not be aware that David icke would STILL be the driving force behind it?
Then think of David and his “Fight the system” shit. Doing what he has done is, once more, showing you he isn’t in the least bit interested in fighting the system. He’s dodging it WITH YOUR HELP! So where is he sticking his neck out? Nowhere! He’s a fucking fraud!
Meanwhile, I’ll republish the Sean Tabatabai info from a previous blog just for the sake of those who may not have read it:
Sean Tabatabai link to globalist operations.
So who’s the guy with the strange name (with “ADL” in the middle of it? A strange quirk considering isn’t it? Not that I’m suggesting anything I just found it funny for obvious reasons).
Well Sean is a Producer – as stated – and is also Icke’s “David Icke.com” webmaster as well as his trusted partner in this venture. But he has strange connections. Now, anyone else with 47 connections on their LinkedIn profile, 2 of which (the most from one organisation) being the BBC, PLUS connections with “Newstate Partners LLP” (look them up) and “EF Education First (first for what? Conditioning students into a globalist mindset AND which has trips to Nazi Concentration Camps in Germany just to keep the holocaust in mind no doubt) would have ANY ONE OF YOU think “Ahah!!” if it were anyone else but the partner of David Icke but, since it is the partner of David Icke then “there must be some simple sort of explanation (which, you can be assured, there will be I’m sure).
Their roots with S.G. Warburg indeed while they advise governments and Central Banks on debt management etc. Yeah, he probably just does their websites too right? Plus the BBC’s, plus EF Education First – ALL globalist organisations. Sure the guy just has to make a living right?
Each of the circles on the outer ring represents one of his connections. This is where, if you hover over them on his LinkedIn page you find, amongst others, Newstate and EF. The large circle in the middle represents his largest number of connections with one organisation and that is only 2, both with the BBC.
Sure, if Icke has a LinkedIn he might even have a couple of people as connections from the BBC – who knows? – after all he used to work for them (Wogan might even be one of them! 
) but Tabatabai having connections with them AND the other two is just a LITTLE teeny weeny bit strange. However, I’m sure you don’t think so so by all means carry on believing.
The words of an “enlightened” man. Rather misogynist but I’m sure Icke’s female fans will forgive him. After all, it’s only a joke right? Fish and slags. 🙂
Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai
http://www.infiniteloveforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2964
Now the following makes sense. Deanna Amato wanting ALL communications cc’d. Watch out People’s Voice workers, your calls and your emails are being monitored. You can take that to the bank!
-
UK Advertising Team
<div “”=””>Cc: miranda.woodgate@, djkennedy@, mark, sylviachen, sally.singer@, kellykpr@, stacey@, sean@thepeoplesvoice.tv, simon@simonludgate.com
ENLIGHTENMENT INDEED!
David Icke: And the little question about approximately £270K of profit from donations.
My humblest apologies to all of you Icke fans out there in never never land. I was wrong! So wrong! What can I say? Except this…….
In my blog “David Icke: The turd in the punchbowl” I offered you information (correct information) as to the costs associated with setting up what David was setting up. I pointed you to his own words regarding the costs and the quality of such equipment and, as he said, the £100K (then £300K) would be just enough to get TPV on air. I stated that this was rubbish, impossible (and David Icke did say he was “performing miracles” after all) and my calculations (again, still valid) regarding ALL of the costs to do what he was stating was being done, suggested that he could never achieve it and have change out of a couple of £million.
ALL of the above is correct and, if you have read the blog entitled “David Icke: The turd in the punchbowl” you will realise it is so. I provide detail on the costs of equipment and rental of premises plus telecom utilities (although the telecom utilities are variable but, to chi eve what he had suggested using fibre optics and, therefore, substantial leased lines to bring the highest quality broadcasts would be in excess of the example I gave). One needs to further consider the costs of other utilities such as heating, lighting, power for all equipment – costs of which are significant in such a case. All of these ongoing costs would need be taken as, at the very least, an annual contract. He could NOT say to a telecom provider for instance: “We’ll take a leased line for a month and continue month to month and see how the donations go”. Same applies to the rental on the premises and all other utilities.
However, ignoring that for the moment because to get the channel launched with the £300K, he stated quite clearly that the money would be spent primarily on the substantial cost of equipment needed (even though, as I have just said, £300K would not even cover 5 of the “top range” broadcast cameras he told you he would purchase. But ok, let’s assume he got a good deal and managed it all within £300K. What would be left to ensure, as he added, the critical personnel such as Simon Ludgate, Sean Tabatabai (very strange relationship there which I intend to cover again at some point), Sonia Poulton plus a handful of others. If you believe these people are working for nothing well, in David’s words, I’ve got a nice two bed seafront bungalow in Birmingham if you’re interested?
Consider this:
Simon Ludgate’s IMDB profile –
Now, am I saying Simon SHOULD work for nothing? NO not at all! Neither should Sonia nor any of the others (including the abused volunteers even though they love being abused). How can someone possibly work for nothing if it is their career? Come on people, at least be a little more “awake” please!
Here’s Simon. Nice big bright smile for the camera (although seeing him in the studio once or twice, I couldn’t recognise that smile at all – I wonder if it was already the “Icke effect”? Probably not. After all everyone smiles for a publicity shot right? :-))
Now, if you happened to view my video regarding Icke’s noncompliant compliance in an earlier blog, you may have noticed this pic of Ludgate and the following article being connected without stating exactly what that connection was.
Note the date of the article.
Note that the TPV Limited Company was “born” during late May of this year.
Note the premises for TPV weren’t acquired until approx the July/August time if you remember. Therefore, at most, the cost of having those premises plus the little utilities needed through to this month (November) would be, at the very most say £7000.
Note the amount required by the donation drive: £300K. Subtract £7000 and you arrive at £293K.
So, they bought all of that equipment with, at the most, £293K? So you still feel you got your money’s worth right? Although, as I said, correctly, there is no way it all could have been bought for £300K EVEN WITH a very good deal.
BUT I ADMIT I WAS WRONG DON’T I? ALWAYS be willing to admit when you’re wrong!
How was I wrong? Well, a TPV insider (who wishes to remain anonymous, for which I apologise but I keep my word when asked) has advised me of the following:
“Ok you can mention the £20k Teddington equipment. It was my understanding from Deanna the original quote to buy was £30,000 however Simon Ludgate negotiated down to £20,000 for all the equipment, including the cameras in the studio. The desks and pc monitors were thrown in to the deal as Teddington studio’s were clearing out and desk’s etc would have been thrown in skips, so TPV simply loaded them up.”
“It’s possible Deanna has a working visa, but I don’t know that, didn’t ever ask her. What I do know if she’s a seamstress and by default not done any work since June at least, so she must be getting paid by TPV to survive. She’s living in the apartment in Islington that was rented originally for Matt Smith and his people, so that won’t be coming cheap. Before that she was living in Camden. I believe she’s been in Hawaii the past 2 weeks, that was her plan at the end September. Not cheap to go to Hawaii …!”
Nice apartment guys!
Now, Deanna Amato is a seamstress in Australia. Yes, a seamstress. She’s been in the UK since June this year so not making an income from her seamstress activities then. So where’s the income coming from? And here’s a question: Does she have a working visa or a vacation visa? Is she paying taxes? If so, where? Or is the money being sent to Hawaii? 😉
“Another Australian, a presenter doing a show called ‘Wakey, Wakey’ called Ellisa Hawke is definately on a holiday passport from July as I have met her, had lunch with her and she cannot officially earn any money from TPV with the passport she has. Regardless, David Icke has employed her, but I don’t know if she’s being paid or not (cash in hand?).
There are many many volunteers, all doing unpaid work, and in my view the venture cannot survive on people’s good will only. It’s clear there are certain individuals being paid though.
Your blog from October resonated with me as I had so many similar experiences with Deanna and TPV.”
” I do believe there is alot happening behind the scenes that would possibly ‘kill’ the TPV venture dead if people knew. “
Well now they do! At least some of it. There’s some which is not for publication at the moment but would you believe racism? And David Icke did NOTHING about it! Once more he chose to protect his favourites within the inner sanctum of Ickeland.
Oh and I meant to add: I, personally met Matt Smith while at the studios one day. He had his father, his sister and one other over with him. He was meant to be heading up the L.A. studio. We chatted and we seemed to get along. So much so, he asked me if I’d like to work with him on some of his programmes. “Sure!” I said. A very strange look and reaction came across from Sean Tabatabai at that point and he said to Matt “Do you want to do that? You don’t have to”. I mean WTF??
Matt replied “Yeah I like the guy”. Perhaps we would have done some good things together but, unfortunately, Matt was offloaded even before I was! I was shocked. No-one would say why and yet I thought about the work his father did in the studio – he had just come off a plane from LA and got right to work. The LA studio, at least for now, is not happening (lucky Americans!). But recently I heard the strangest thing from an inside source:
“The LA studio has been cancelled. Matt Smith (ex LA child actor) was chosen to run an LA studio and he came over in late September with his lady friend, a few days later his father was also brought over to help out with the construction of the studio. I met his father at Heathrow airport. Within 4 days Mr Icke had sent back Matt Smith, his father and friend to LA as he felt TPV has been infultraited by the lady friend. So forget the LA studio for now.”
It would seem David doesn’t trust women too much. First Pamela and now Matt’s “lady friend” (I think the source is referring to Matt’s sister).
I’ll say this for Matt: He had a sunny character. Easily likeable. Perhaps that was the problem? More likeable than “Ickeable”?
WAKEY WAKEY ICKEY WIKEYS!
CURIOSITY COULD KILL THE ICKE
Ok folks, I would, if you will, like you to consider this very carefully. It is a clear as day scenario which I really do hope you can recognise for what it represents. It is VERY important that you grasp the nature of the media, manipulation, the use of “bad press” as good press and the sheer desperation to suppress REAL criticism while using fake (or so very easily dealt with) MSM criticism (in this case a “smear campaign” used to your every advantage).
David Icke and TPV are complaining bitterly about the Daily Mirror article which attempts to use the unfortunate death of a young boy about 6 months ago to “smear” David Icke and “blame” the death on him. TPV and Icke are also saying “Isn’t it strange how they are running this story JUST before we launch?”
Now, please think very clearly about this. YES, I would agree it IS very strange they are running this story just before the launch.
Have you heard the term “All publicity is good publicity”? That is what all these celebs who are just celebs because of their celebrity use. Jordan/Katie Price etc. They have nothing to offer in terms of talent so how do they create their “celebrity”? By crass, “bombshell” stories – either positive OR negative – which keep you talking about them and buying “OK” and all the other mags.
Have you heard of reverse psychology and “paradoxical marketing”? I’m sure you have heard the former but research the latter if you have not heard of that. These techniques are being used against you every single day.
Have you heard about the curiosity that killed the cat? Sure you have!
Yes, by now I figure you know EXACTLY where I’m going with this and you’d be right. The timing of that article IS perfect (while it is an OBVIOUS “smear” such that it is no smear at all for the even slightly intelligent). So why do it?
CURIOSITY for one thing. How many people reading it will wonder about David Icke and google him and check out his website and find TPV?
You have heard of stories being “placed” in news for propaganda purposes. To highlight people or points etc. To drive an emotional response (no matter if positive or negative). This is the best thing David Icke could have happen to him and HE KNOWS IT.
Why do I say he knows it?
Here’s why:
He USES it. He actually links to the piece on his own website. Plus, because it is such an obvious smear, he gains kudos for it through the belief by fans that it is REAL attempt to attack him. It is brilliant. Not only that but Richie whatsisname is actually trying to get the journalist to appear on the show. Who guesses she will appear? She might and I would not be at all surprised if she did. Perhaps even to offer an apology, you never know!
Emily Retter is quite into her art plus she also has done freelance writing for the likes of the Mirror, the Sun, the Sunday Mail etc. Now, notice they’re all quite trashy publications which just publish all sorts of crap to a rather low brow readership but quite a mass audience of not too bright people (sorry but true). Now just imagine this for a second (it’s not that big a stretch): Let’s say Emily knows Sean, or Neil Hague or Sonia Poulton or any of the inner crew (media is a small world you know). Is it outwit the bounds of possibility that any one of them has said “Hey Emily, we know each other” or “Hey Emily, I know your editor” or even just go straight to the editor. Do not be naive. I KNOW how things work in the corporate world and they can be dirty – media is one of the dirtiest as you know!
Now think about this for a moment before saying “Yes but he needs to respond to trash like that!”
I am nothing when it comes to media. And yet, I know of a number of people now who have simply posted my blogs re David Icke to the David Icke forum and EVERY TIME this has been done, the moderators remove them on the basis that “He is a hateful, vindictive person” or similar (Yes “I-am”, I mean you). They remove the blogs rather than respond to them. They also, therefore, remove the capability of any and all who may wish to debate them on the David Icke forum. Those debates could end up being VERY negative and hateful toward me. I don’t care. That is not the point. Anyone who wishes to state their opinion to me on my blog is welcome to do so. You have to take the rough with the smooth. I will never allow comments that are pure character assassination not based upon considered points however just as I was concerned about a few comments made toward Icke (until the poster explained they were not intended to be threatening).
If David Icke is so quick and happy to actually publish (link) to a mainstream article which has an IMMENSE readership and is having a go at him, why would that be when he is absolutely suppressing all discussion and/or links to my blog on his forum?
Are you beginning to see this?
You see, I am not smearing him or attacking him on the basis of some poorly considered, trash “hit piece”. Further, David knows the circulation of the Mirror and how that can bring a tremendous number of people to his and TPV’s sites. What he WOULD NOT want is for that same number of people to read my articles on him because my articles are not trash. They are not poorly considered. They hit him hard because they actually use his very own words.
Sometimes a man’s worst enemy can be himself and his ego.
Nevertheless, brilliant promotion David. I tip my hat to you once more. 🙂
David Icke: The non compliance Ofcom alliance!
Introducing the Secretary of State for Culture, sport and media: Ed Vaizey.
On 18 May 2009 the Daily Telegraph reported that receipts submitted by Vaizey show that he ordered a £467 sofa, a £544 chair, a £280.50 low table and a £671 table in February 2007 from Oka, an upmarket furniture shop. The Commons Fees Office initially rejected the claim as the receipt said that the furniture was due to be delivered to Vaizey’s home address in West London, but was later paid when Vaizey advised the Fees Office that the furniture was intended for his second home at his Wantage constituency. Vaizey told the Daily Telegraph that we (he and his wife) “had it delivered to London because we would be in to collect it and we were driving down with it.”
When these claims became public, Vaizey said that he had repaid the cost of the Oka furniture and the antique chair which he had bought with taxpayers’ money: “I accept that the £300 armchair was an antique item and therefore that claim should not have been made. I also accept that the Oka items could be deemed as being of higher quality than necessary. I have paid back both these claims. I have not claimed for any other furniture bought for my constituency home at any time before or since.” Vaizey has described himself to be “relatively affluent”.
In November 2011, it was further reported that Vaizey had submitted expenses claims of 8p for a 350-yard car journey and 16p for a 700-yard journey.
[A comment related to my own experience of submitting expenses during my career. It takes time to fill in an expense claim. If I were to sit at my desk and fill in an expense claim for 8p and 16p, given the time taken to do so and the salary I was on which meant, in that time (5 mins?) I was paid approx £3 through salary; I would be sacked on the spot and rightly so.]
Ed Vaizey then, as much a cheap bastard as David Icke (Teddington Dave – tell them about Teddington). Luckily for Ed he works for the government however and his 8p and 16p expenses will be paid. Thank god you don’t work for David Icke Ed. But then, it can honestly be stated he reports to you doesn’t he? He’s submitted to your regulation after all.
Ed Vaizey is the man OFCOM report to at present. Ed Vaizey is part of the system (as is Ofcom) which David Icke purports to wishing to remove and destroy and his main way of doing that, he says, is for us all to play “the non comply dance”.
I want to make something clear to all you TPV workers who assume I am out to get you off the air: WRONG, I am not. What I AM interested in doing is showing YOU as well as a multitude of others, the charlatan that David Icke is (and most of his core team you work for as they get paid and you don’t). Once you’re of no further benefit to them (and I promise you this) your volunteering will be dropped. You’re a resource – cheap and to be used, abused and then, at the right time, no more. IF you have the guts you try to portray you do to take on the system then let’s see them: First, since you are supporting the network through your free labour and since you probably funded it through donations, TELL ICKE YOU WANT TO SEE THE BOOKS! Then, also, TELL ICKE YOU WANT TO DRAW THAT LINE IN THE SAND AND FIGHT OFCOM.
But you won’t will you? You’re all so defiant aren’t you? Far far easier to throw tantrums and boos at the likes of me than take on what you suggest you’re taking on. Shame you’re so full of shit and scared of your own shadow while you follow a man that doesn’t EVER walk his talk! What hope do you possibly have in taking on the system? Zero!
Anyhow, it’s this guy, Ed Vaizey, who is ultimately responsible for deciding who is and who is not “a fit and proper person” for holding a UK broadcast licence. Would you give your enemy the keys to your front door? For christ’s sakes grow up people, nevermind wake up because you’ve got a long way to go before you do that!
DAVID ICKE, OFCOM & THE PEOPLE’S VOICE
Hi David,
Sorry for the little delay that introduced but, you see, I don’t like the idea of you screwing with your audience. The people who are funding you. I also, personally, do not like to be either lied to or misled. You now have a real problem whichever way you look at it and I can state, categorically, that I would have done the same even if I had been working at The People’s Voice today.
Why? Well, for the above reasons but also for a much bigger reason:
YOU tell people to get up off their arses and fight this system. Here’s an example of you saying exactly that (as if you are some “big boy” who ever says “boo!” to the system)….
SO! Where is your “line in the sand”? Where is your fight against the system? Where’s YOUR challenge to them? SHOW YOUR AUDIENCE DAVID! WHERE IS IT?
Let’s see that walk David. Let’s see it because I’ve heard the talk!
If you don’t David, “Don’t look to me for sympathy when you’re regulated mate because you’ve got your chance now!” GET THE POINT DAVID?
So here’s your challenge David: Get your flock together with a focus and a strategy and attack the establishment through OFCOM. You have the numbers David. Actually use them! Are you “big” enough to take the challenge and show your leadership? Are your Ickolytes sufficiently motivate to support you in the fight David or have they just got enough “mouth” to throw tantrums at people like me for calling you out? You’ve got the numbers David. Instead of just droning on and offering up the same old shit and the same old faces talking about the same old shit, why don’t you USE your flock? Get them motivated to attack OFCOM and the establishment. THEN David, and ONLY then, will I sit up and listen. THEN you may be deserving of your “title”. Otherwise, you’re all mouth Dave looking for the next donation.
Now, your Ickolytes are shouting about this OFCOM regulation and they probably despise me for having inquired and brought it to OFCOM’s attention but I did it for the sake of the truth movement” you suggest you are supportive of and you wish to be the “Big Cheese” of. So “Big Cheese”, the thing about a “Leader” is he has to lead BY EXAMPLE or he’s nothing but a windbag! You see, I believe wholeheartedly that you’re a windbag and it is my wholehearted belief you’re in this for the money and the money alone.
If you were “fighting the system” as you scream at others to do, then you would not have registered your company under the Communications Act 2003 (which, ironically protects you from having to open up to your audience what you’re doing and how you’re doing it). THAT is why, although you KNEW you needed a licence (for if you didn’t then you are incompetent in your business), you didn’t wish to advise your audience for the very reason they are now communicating about – they see you’re just as controlled under regulation as anyone else.
THE ONLY WAY OUT IS TO FIGHT THE SYSTEM ICKE OTHERWISE YOU’RE PART OF IT (which I entirely believe you are and that is why I am sure you will get your licence because the establishment want you to ‘lead’ a flock down a cul-de-sac (emphasis on the word “CUL”).
The thing is – and your audience don’t even understand this – THEY think “we funded it so let’s fight OFCOM” LOL. So funny. They can’t fight on your behalf because YOU and “The People’s Voice” (you being the Company Director) are the only two “legal persons” who can fight this if you DON’T get the licence because it is only you and the legal person of OFCOM who are a party to the contract.
IF you DO get the licence however, what are you then going to tell your audience? “Oh it doesn’t matter”. LOL
Sure it doesn’t David. It doesn’t matter to you, to Sean and to “The People’s Voice” company because you will still have your business, your audience, the money and your station.
The ONLY people it matters to are those who comprise the very audience you are misleading. They can’t POSSIBLY get the unspun truth you are trying to suggest they will get. But I know, so many of them will just still blindly follow you Dave.
Last thing though Dave: You did say you could see I knew what I was talking about all those weeks ago. Well, when you want intelligence, you get it but a word in your ear – don’t fcuk with it when you do!
Earthling 
16 comments