Barry the Bullshitter!
Meet Barry.
Barry is the biggest bullshitting prick on Planet Earth. I say that because I don’t think he can be stupid for, if he is, then he is the most monumentally stupid prick on Planet Earth!
Barry wears his hair in an ‘Einsteinian” fashion to make himself appear intellectual. Barry is an intellectual! But I’m about to explain why that word doesn’t account for much.
Barry is an Emeritus Professor at the London School of Economics (‘Emeritus’ meaning retired. Past his sell by date). Barry really is a ‘useless eater’.
Before getting into the “meat” however, let me make sure you’re acquainted with the LSE: London School of Economics. All you need to know in a nutshell.
Now, I know you’ll wonder at the following and why I include it. Well it’s simply because this literature and other media would not have references to the LSE as they do unless they had their basis in fact and those who are in the know would pick up on the “in jokes”.
Then you have this guy who is a “God” to those in the LSE. So, from terrorists to financial terrorists who wish to restructure society, the LSE has them all!
And no, your majestic one, the LSE would have never seen it coming as I will soon explain!
Ok. Now back to Barry and his arbitrary dispensary of dysentery…
Barry is the ‘father’ (or one of them) of “Securitisation theory” which readers of my blog will be well acquainted with by now.
A fundamental tenet of Securitisation theory, within the sphere of International Relations (IR) is:
“A ‘threat’ can be socially constructed by a ‘Speech Act’ given by a perceived authority figure, figures or institution and, if successfully transmitted/broadcast such that the ‘audience’ accepts it, it can be considered ‘securitised’. This ‘securitisation’ of the threat however, does not mean that there exists an actual, objective threat. The ‘threat’ need not be real but simply accepted as a threat by the audience which, usually in such circumstances, will trust the authority.”
Here is an article written for “International Affairs” (Chatham House) in September 2019. It is clear and precise.
This process follows the securitizing logic of the Copenhagen School,7 according to which any issue can be perceived as a security threat ‘not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ to a receptive audience.8 Thus, the key to this understanding of health securitization is not the actual ‘threat’ of a pathogen but a successful speech act or narrative ‘through which an intersubjective understanding is constructed within a political community to treat something as an existential threat to a referent object by a securitising actor, [generating] endorsement of emergency measures beyond the rules that would otherwise bind’,9 or a suspension of so-called ‘normal politics’.
I really do not know how to make this clearer to people.
Please read the segment in bold, above, again and again, if need be, until it sinks in.
“any issue can be perceived as a security threat ‘not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ to a receptive audience.”
“Intersubjective” means an agreed and accepted understanding between people (the Actor and his audience). Each individual being a ‘subject’ so “intersubjective”.
“Referent object” is the object under threat. i.e. in the case of a pathogen, the population.
Now, to drill this “it need not be a real threat” home: You will remember the 2003 Invasion of Iraq and Tony Blair’s “dodgy dossier”. I intend to post. something on that later but the reader should note that the steps taken by Blair in the run up to the Iraq war, were securitisation moves. It was, ultimately, successful in that he got his war but, while the parliamentary audience approved the war, the public did not. As it turned out, there were no WMDs at all! A ‘constructed threat’ by Blair and his ‘speech acts’ to an audience composed of the UK Parliament and the wider public. The public were not on his side (although, to a degree, accepted Saddam was a ‘bad man’) and Blair’s and the Parliament’s ignorance of the public in this securitisation, led to Blair being depised and called a war criminal.
Echoes, then, of today. Yes, overall, today’s public appear to support the securitisation of Covid 19 (if we believe what we hear, read and see in media) but the public are losing faith and patience as more and more are waking up to the totalitarian regime, or structure, which is being put in place with Covid as the excuse. Again, ‘we’ accepted the fundamental: There were WMDs – sorry, I mean “Covid 19”. That acceptance is all they need. You can debate vaccines and who gets them and masks and social distancing etc etc etc all you wish but the sheer fact you’ve accepted there is a real virus is all they need.
Ok. Back to Barry:
Don’t simply assume Barry is just some old, retired LSE professor. You’d be seriously underestimating his influence. See here:
And here:
No need to watch the entire lectures. The above are just to demonstrate who he speaks to and if you wish to hear him speak on the New Global Order to a military audience, by all means do so.
But, to get right to the crux of this post:
Barry Buzan, together with Ole Weaver and Japp De Wild, is a “founding father” of securitisation theory. Do not be confused by the word “theory” in this case. Securitisation ‘theory’ simply describes the happenings, events, speech and reactions to those who wish to construct a threat (particularly an “existential threat”) and achieve ‘buy in’ to the reality of that threat by the audience being told it is a threat. In the case of Climate Change and Covid 19, the audience is us, the global population.
The referent object in the case of Covid, is the global population. The referent object in the case of climate change is not the earth itself but, really, the balance of life within the biosphere since, the story goes, if the seas rise, the ice caps melt, the temperature rises and there is an increase in infectious diseases (the latter coming to the fore in the ‘story’ just over the recent decade) then animals, plants and human life are all at risk. That is the ‘story’.
So Barry knows all of this. He understands that the construction of any threat to be securitised need not be a real threat at all. However Barry and his crowd of academics (and students) have bought into the climate change/sustainability agenda hook, line and sinker. Therefore, to raise the idea that Covid is simply the climate catalyst to Barry and his ‘army’, is akin to heresy. They cannot acknowledge this because they want the results (i.e. significantly increased momentum of the climate agenda) of what Covid has provided.
So, because of his own philosophy and politics and people who share such views, even if they know or suspect that Covid is fake and has been constructed as a threat while being no threat at all, they must hold the idea that it is, in fact, real because it entirely supports their climate change agenda and their wishes. It is similar with Dr Colin Alexander, whom I previously posted about. His University (just like Barry’s and Imperial College and most, if not all, others) support and promote the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals). To support them, they have to justify that support. The justification is we have the threat of global warming/climate change. For someone like me to come along and say the threat is fake and has been catalysed by another fake called Covid, is anathema to them. Acknowledgement of my ‘thesis’, or even consideration of it, would have these people jumping through hoops to try and support their theses and discount my thesis at the same time.
So, here we have Barry making some points on climate change at an ‘event’ hosted at the LSE last week and which I ‘attended’ by Zoom. He can’t see the wood for the trees! I ask a question but they dare not ‘table’ it….
LSE Event video: https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/buzan:4?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
Imperative you listen to it all but note at 10.19: “Preferably involving the deaths of a lot of rich people”.
If you or I were to write this on a post on. twitter or facebook/instagram etc, what do you think the outcome might be? But a lefty academic, paid by these rich people (indirectly he is) because he is promoting the right causes, can come right out and say it. However, let’s hear the names Barry. Let’s hear the names in your head. You sickening, delusional old bastard.
“Darling, there’s an elephant in our front lounge!”
Barry: “Oh don’t be such a Conspiracy theorist dear!”
“You’re one to talk! Jabbering on about non existent threats!”
Barry’s controlled by his own self importance and by the wish to maintain his ‘tenure’ and gravitas within the world of academia and he knows that, while he will speak, objectively, about securitisation and that there need be no real ‘threat’ involved, he dare not speak subjectively about that securitisation process being applied to his pet ‘love’ of Sustainability and climate change or of Covid 19 and demonstrating that the ‘threats’ in these two instances are fraudulently constructed. He would never get his paid invites back to the LSE, to the Middle East and to speak to the Norwegian military. Barry would be a ‘nobody’ once again and be demonised and cast adrift from the very life he has become accustomed to.
Barry, it turns out, is exceptionally stupid after all, however. While he fantasises about the rich being killed by “Climate Change”, he refuses to recognise the obvious: The people promoting his “Climate Change” are comprised of the richest capitalists on the planet! Silly Barry!
They do say socialists are just dumb communists after all!
And that, your Majesty, is why the LSE never saw the 2008 crash coming! They can’t see their own theories in practice!
Don’t be like Barry! Barry’s a useful idiot!
Academia’s full of them: Neil Ferguson, Barry Buzan and Colin Alexander. So far up their own arseholes they swallow their own bullshit.
But while Barry will speak in abstract terms about Securitisation, he will never say “There it is!” I wonder why?
Ahh! That could possibly be why!
THE POWER OF HEROIC DECEPTION 101
What do Jonathan Van Tam and his cohorts in this Covid deception have in common with the ex “Mrs Earthling”?
Far back in the mists of time, in Singapore, I underwent a divorce which was filled with constructed lies (perjury) by the other party who said at the time “There’s no smoke without fire”. What she was referring to was the construction of a ‘big lie’ which she and her lawyer agreed to state to the court so as to seed the idea that I was hiding vast sums of money in banks around the world. Some of the perjury she came up with was proven by me (not that it mattered to the court) and some couldn’t possibly be. This was one which couldn’t.
In 2005, while I didn’t exactly trust government and politicians, I never would have believed in the ‘big lie’. I hadn’t even heard of it. It wasn’t until later that I read “Mein Kampf” and understood what it was and, for that, I thank Adolf Hitler for explaining it. By the way, it is generally submitted that it was Adolf who used the ‘big lie’ but, in actual fact, if one reads “Mein Kampf” one can clearly read he was speaking of others who used it to their advantage. I need not say who those “others” were.
So, the ex “Mrs Earthling” and her legal representative conjured up the lie that I had various, hidden bank accounts across the world. She knew it was a lie but they knew that even the suggestion of it would have the court consider the possibility: “No smoke without fire”.
There are so many parallels I can call up from that time and relate them to this time, it’s uncanny but they have their basis in sheer deception.
What has this got to do with Jonathan Van-Tam and all the others in this “Covid game”?
Well, how does one prove a negative? One can’t. It’s practically impossible. How would I prove I had no hidden bank accounts? I would have to write to every single bank in the world to have them reply “No, Mr Earthling has no bank account with us”.
Here we have an article from July 2021…..
Deputy Chief Medical Officer Jonathan Van-Tam said of the data: “That’s truly massive (that 60,000 deaths and 22 million infections have now been prevented by jab protection). The benefit of vaccines is in that kind of secret work that you never see because if people don’t go into hospital and they don’t die, you never see that.”
It’s an odd assertion he makes because I know of many, such as myself, who haven’t had one jab and have never practiced wearing a mask or social distancing during this entire previous 2 years and we have not gone to hospital or died. Proof, if proof were needed, that it is not the vaccine which has protected us.
But, again, just like “Mrs Earthling”, Jonathan Van-Tam’s assertion is based upon proving a negative.
Let me make things even clearer:
Unknown to you, the reader, or anyone else, I, in fact, own an island in the Pacific and on that island, is an extinct volcano where I have stored 666 Intercontinental ballistic missiles. I have a team of scientists and engineers who maintain the facility and last night, at 23.00 hours Pacific time, we launched three missiles to intercept and destroy a large asteroid hurtling toward earth which would have, point blank, hit Manhattan island, cause destruction to the entire eastern seaboard of the United States; Create secondary earthquakes out to the San Andreas fault and cause a tsunami which would have obliterated the United Kingdom, most of western Europe and the western edge of the continent of Africa. All Caribbean islands and people – gone; Mexico decimated and the eastern seaboard of South America – gone. There would have been deaths in the region of 1 billion people or more.
The only reason these 1 billion people are still alive is because I, Earthling, destroyed that asteroid before it hit the earth’s atmosphere.
I deserve a hero’s medal and the freedom of all cities of the world plus a Nobel Prize for humanitarianism. There should be monuments erected globally in my name for I am actually a hero.
Sorry? You say what? I didn’t do that at all and I am just telling one ‘big lie’? PROVE IT! You owe your life to me!
Just like Jonathan Van-Tam, Bill Gates, Chris Whitty, Dr. Fauci, Boris Johnson and all the other leaders who are protecting millions from death and hospitalisation, I did my bit also. The only reason you can’t recognise the benefit of what I did last night and my secret work is because nobody died.
But there’s “no smoke without fire” you know!
And that narrative of wearing your masks and taking the vaccine, thereby “saving lives”, makes you a hero too! And everybody wants to be a hero, right?
So do as we say and the virus will go away.
Oh wait! Another asteroid incoming! Catch you all later, I have work to do! Be afraid! Be very afraid!
Ka-ching!
Ghislaine’s in the jizz lane of the government paedo network.
“Too sensational and impure” my arseum! This is a matter of “national” and “international” security and protecting the very high crimes of the very high and mighty. As it always is.
This is why you’ll never get anything out of this trial except those who they may wish to hang out to dry and my guess is, she’ll walk and, if she doesn’t, she will anyhow. She and her intelligence buddies have too much dirt on Washington not to. Same applied to Epstein who I do not believe is dead.
They’re coming after the Parliamentarians now….
I have, over the course of this last year or so, written to MPs individually and as a group, about Covid, Climate change etc. In those emails, I have asked repeatedly, whether they think they’re protected from all of this in the long term since they are paid so well and get their pensions etc?
However, what I missed to point out is also their being allowed to act as highly paid consultants to business and the other perks they get.
All I now wish to say to the Desmond Swaynes and the Damian Greens and the rest of them is: “Oh dear, oh dear!” 😉
Of course, the chosen few (and it will be a small few) will still make their £millions but it’s not the chosen few (who play the elite game and support all of the policies now being put in place) I’m talking about. It’s the run of the mill parliamentarians who, to the elite, are as much a waste of space (when you want a non democratic, totalitarian system anyhow) as you and I.
I did warn the inept bastards while I also exposed Damian Green in this “advisory” bullshit years ago. But then, of course, I’m just a “Conspiracy blogger”.
See from 13.57 in the video on this post: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2017/11/05/ahh-damian/
And from an email just a few weeks back:
“It is laughable in the sense that you are turkeys voting for Christmas because, in the long term, this agenda is going to affect you and your families and friends too. You may view yourself as ‘above any impact’ due to your present positions but you couldn’t be more wrong. Anyhow, that will be for you to find out in time.”
Email to Parliament: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/11/01/email-to-parliament/
BUT, they’re so slow and thick and simply refuse to accept there is what I tell them there is (i.e. an overall, all encompassing agenda) that they will never put 2 and 2 together to make 4. They’re really not intelligent people, I promise you that! Again, I’ve met and talked to quite a few now. They’re grey, inept, inconsequential and incapable. Why we elect them to their positions beats me but then I guess it doesn’t. After all, why people still fall for this Covid shit beats me too! I guess the country as a whole ain’t too bright and so, the parliamentarians come from the same population of not too bright people so what should one expect?
Beginning to feel the heat you dumb bastards? Being the MP isn’t the road to riches you thought it would be now, is it? 🙂
And do you know why that is? It’s called the Global Covenant of Mayors! I did a video on that on youtube but youtube banned me so I was just made aware of a site which has archived most of my previous YT videos and here it is:
Covenant of Mayors: https://s3.wasabisys.com/billgateswantstokillus.com/index.html#/videos/Earthling/The_Covid_Covenant-Xo3VILlKhQM
How Mayors and Governors who play ball (and that’s most) are now running the show and will replace democratically elected, National Parliaments.
It even affects Brazil (and every other country on earth). Listen to what he says about having no power when it comes to Covid policy:
Bolsonaro re Governors and Mayors: https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/Bolsonaro:b8?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
Bye Bye MPs! Your time is up!
In the End days…..
You cannot even trust a “man of God” because, just like the Pope, there is no God in them…
I picked up on a “Reverend” tweeting about Anti vaxxers and how obscene we all are. I found his rhetoric toward the unvaxxed obscene in itself, coming from a “man of God”. So I decided to make my feelings clear to the good Reverend.
Holy sweet water of Jesus! I found a Priest who hates the truth!
My last tweet simply asked him why he was so scared if he was ‘immune’ and he blocked me after the usual sort of put down – something about “crazed tweets”.
The block and “cheerio” came after this reply tweet of mine:
From Wikipedia:
Michael Coren (born 15 January 1959) is a British-Canadian writer and clergyman. A long-time television personality, Coren hosted The Michael Coren Show on the Crossroads Television System from 1999 to 2011 before moving to the Sun News Network to host The Arena with Michael Coren,[2] from 2011 until the channel’s demise in early 2015.[3] He has also been a long-time radio personality, particularly on Toronto talk radio station CFRB. Coren is currently a columnist for the Toronto Star and iPolitics.
He has written more than ten books, including biographies of G. K. Chesterton, H. G. Wells, Arthur Conan Doyle, J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis. His latest books are Heresy: Ten Lies They Spread About Christianity (2012), The Future of Catholicism (2013), Hatred: Islam’s War on Christianity (2014) and Epiphany: A Christian’s Change of Heart & Mind over Same-Sex Marriage (2016).
And here’s the kicker:
Coren was born in Walthamstow, Essex, England, of Jewish heritage, and raised secular.
I’ll leave it there. 😉
A Priest or an undercover Rabbi?
John 8:44
King James Bible
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
The “War” narrative of Covid 19 securitisation
Why did Boris and so many other national leaders refer to a “War against Covid”?
Because, using such language in their ‘speech acts’ has the audience conditioned to accept wartime emergency measures because there is an “existential threat” to their collective wellbeing.
Understand something when deciding to read the blogposts on my site: While, admittedly, there are posts which are entirely flippant and posts where I may veer off into theorizing territory, this is NOT a bloody ‘tinfoil hat’ blog!
When I research, I research and check every facet I can find, related to my subject matter, before I present any conclusion I will 100% stand behind. That is not to say I haven’t, in the past, made mistakes. I have (but not many) because perhaps I have stepped into an area where I am not entirely comfortable with my level of knowledge of it. However, I tend to steer away from this. For instance, you won’t see me discussing medical detail of any sort although I may relate some of which I have recently discovered and can easily determine the veracity of.
However, I am entirely comfortable within the realm of politics, law, money creation and, in this case, securitisation.
We, as an ‘audience’, have been told a story by ‘Actors” (Securitarian actors to be precise).
The story, or narrative, is given to us to present a constructed (manufactured) issue as a ‘threat’.
The actors have presented this story to us to achieve various goals which could not be achieved without our acceptance of the narrative and, therefore, our allowing the emergency measures they have implemented, to be actioned.
If the general public fully understood this basic tool and premise, the huge cloud of confusion that people are in at what is happening with Covid and Climate Change and how all of these measures being put in place make no sense (to the untrained eye), would be lifted and they could clearly see the deception they have fallen for. To accept that they have been deceived would be the first step toward resolving the authoritarian mess we are currently experiencing. Once acknowledged and accepted, the renewed understanding would allow a massive number of people (preferably the majority) to turn and simply say (by way of action – i.e a total stop of all activity which supported the authoritarian ‘matrix’) “Enough really is enough”.
There’s a saying: “Knowledge is power” and that is true. BUT the issue is: If I have that knowledge and, in a country of 70M people, a couple of thousand have it – while that couple of thousand hold no places of power or influence – then that couple of thousand only have “potential power” but no “kinetic power” (or energy). Now imagine a few million (even just 5 for argument’s sake) shared that same knowledge: THAT would turn into kinetic power and an energy which would scare the UK government and monarchy to death.
“We understand now! And yes, it is a war. A war on us, by you! So now we’ve set out the situation nice and succinctly, where do you want to go from here?”
And remember this: People like Dr Christopher Ankersen and Professor Barry Buzan know that a constructed ‘threat’ need not be real at all.
Again, I repeat:
“the key to this understanding of health securitisation is not the actual ‘threat’ of a pathogen but a successful speech act or narrative ‘through which an intersubjective (intersubjective means existing between conscious minds; shared by more than one conscious mind. i.e the audience and the actor, together) understanding is constructed within a political community (in this case, the world population) to treat something as an existential threat to a referent object (again, the world population in this case) by a securitising actor (Bill Gates, Boris Johnson, Prince Charles, Chris Whitty et al and all their compliant media) generating endorsement of emergency measures beyond the rules that would otherwise bind, or a suspension of so-called ‘normal politics’.“
This paper traces how pandemic influenza has been framed as a security threat over the past two decades and the eventual success (and limitations) of this framing (1). In doing so the article draws its theoretical inspiration from the Copenhagen School’s securitisation theory (Buzan et al. 1998). Buzan et al. describe their project as to ‘explore the logic of security itself to find out what differentiates security…from that which is merely political’ (p. 5). They argue (p. 26) that successfully labelling an issue as ‘security’ takes it beyond the realm of normal political discourse and allows exceptional actions to be undertaken. Crucially, ‘[an] issue becomes a security issue… not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ (p. 24). The process by which this happens is securitisation: ‘the positioning through speech acts (usually by a political leader) of a particular issue as a threat to survival, which in turn (with the consent of the relevant constituency) enables emergency measures and the suspension of “normal politics” in dealing with that issue’ (McDonald 2008, p. 567). It is the (re)presentation of an issue as an existential threat which makes a speech act a securitising move
By the early 1990s, however, with the nuclear threat receding and the ‘clear and present danger’ of global war apparently consigned to the dustbin of history, governments began to grapple with new ‘non-traditional’ security threats. This changing context produced a permissive atmosphere so much so that towards the end of the decade emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases (ERIDs), including pandemic influenza, could begin to be discussed as both public health hazards and security risks (Garrett 1994, Glezen, 1996, Gensheimer et al. 1999, McInnes and Lee 2006).
Again:
Crucially, ‘[an] issue becomes a security issue… not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ (p. 24). The process by which this happens is securitisation.
I’d appreciate anyone reading this to please leave a “like” if it resonates, you can understand it and it ‘hits the spot’ for you. And that goes for any and all posts you may read. Sharing would also help.
UK Parliament: “You have employers, we don’t! So take your medicine plebs!”
So, I decide to send an FOI request to the Houses of Parliament. This is how it went…
MY ORIGINAL EMAIL
THE RESPONSE
SO, MY APOLOGIES TO THOSE OF YOU OUT THERE WHO ARE MORE DISGUSTED BY A FEW WORDS THAN YOU ARE FROM GETTING SCREWED, BUT I “LOST IT”. I DESPISE THESE BASTARDS AND FEEL THE NEED TO MAKE THAT CLEAR.
IF, IN MY DREAMS, EVER CAME TO POWER, I WOULD RE-INTRODUCE HANGING AND WOULD, WITH ABSOLUTE PLEASURE, DO THE JOB MYSELF AND MAKE SURE THEY TOOK A LONG TIME HANGING FROM THAT ROPE. I’D LISTEN TO ZERO EXCUSES FROM ANY OF THEM. AND, AS I’M SURE YOU’RE AWARE, I WOULDN’T STOP AT PARLIAMENT. THERE WOULD BE THOSE ABOVE PARLIAMENT AND THOSE BELOW WHO WOULD NOT DODGE THE ROPE.
But perhaps there are those reading who do not understand the “employment” reference.
Here is a post I wrote way back in March of 2014. It may “illuminate” things for you: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2014/03/06/the-uk-government-are-all-self-employed-private-contractors/
So, I’ve covered, in the past, the fact that these Members of Parliament can ‘jump’ in and out of various “skins” or, put another way, wear various “hats” dependent upon the circumstances. It is called “Capacity” where they are one type of ‘legal person’ when meeting you at their local MP’s surgery (for constituents only) and another capacity (private individual) IF they wish to have a chat with you down the pub or at some event, and another capacity when invited to NGO events such as Bilderberg (again, attending as private individuals which means they do not need to divulge anything which is discussed or anything they, themselves said) and while they are invited as “private individuals” it’s not as if they’re all invited to attend because they all have an interest in bird spotting or because they have a certain gold handicap. They’re invited not because of who they are, privately, but because of who and what they are, publicly. This is obvious and why they are allowed a pass to attend Bilderberg and the like is because the British State supports Bilderberg otherwise, they’d be committing treason. DO YOU SEE HOW THIS WORKS?
So, if the UK treasury does not employ these MPs (then Who do they work for? How can the UK Parliament say ‘They work for you’ when they are self employed and Parliament do not, therefore, have control by implementing policy on them?; They are not employed by the House of Commons/UK Parliament.
Mr. H. WilsonCan the hon. Member say whether the Treasury, which ought to set an example as a good employer in this connection, does provide automatic insurance for civil servants travelling by air?
§Mr. PowellThe Treasury is not the employer of Ministers of the Crown.
§Mr. J. GriffithsWill the hon. Member get his terms right? Ministers of the Crown are not non-employed, but self-employed.
§Mr. PowellI am much obliged.
They legislate that YOUR employer discriminates against you if you are unvaccinated yet their employer (and they are self employed) is hardly going to discriminate against them.
It would appear the UK government contracts with self employed consultants.
The United Kingdom certainly has a problem and that problem is systemic corruption enabled by this (and multiple examples of other) deception.
THE QUEEN ‘I talk but don’t do!”: COP THIS!
The British public and the World public need to wake up! And fast!
Queen “irritated” by lack of action on climate change ahead of COP26
“At an engagement in Wales, the Queen was heard expressing irritation by the lack of progress on climate change as she criticises those who “talk but don’t do” ahead of COP26″.
So the old, hypocritical fraud – soon to leave this world like her “virus” husband – has the sheer audacity to complain that COP participants “talk but don’t do” while she and her inbred, paedophile-loving family, both, do not “DO”, PLUS they stand to benefit in the $billions from the $90 trillion which Charles is desperate to be released.
Read on and you will understand the above statement and its veracity:
Of course, perhaps Nicola Sturgeon “failed” to disclose Her Putrid one’s lobbying because Her Putrid one owns all the Sturgeons in the UK:
So, again, the old bitch propagandises for the Climate Change Agenda – even to the point of attending Glasgow in November for COP 26 where she is bound to make some speech dramatising the urgent need for action, yet any and all policy and legislation which is passed to deal with this fake threat of Climate Change, will not only NOT impact on her, her family or their land and interests in any way, but you can be damned sure it will also take into consideration her and her family’s commercial and financial interests.
Do you know why? Because “SUSTAINABILITY” is not about them or the billionaires who push it. It will never affect them. The laws are written to reflect the wishes of this level of society. There IS no “Climate Change”. “Climate Change” is all about just a few things:
- Levelling up the economics (for the billionaire class) across the planet. Matching the fundamental costs associated with business interests in the “Global North” and the “Global South”. These people want the entire planet as their playground. They don’t want the hassle of having to deal with various currencies and taxes and other costs as they have their interests across the globe.
- China is ignored for the pollution it causes because “climate change” is not an issue in reality and China’s (and Asia’s) need to (slightly) improve their overall wealth needs them to be able to leverage greenhouse gases and fossil fuels etc to benefit from their own, rapid, ‘industrial revolution’ to get closer to (but not at) present western levels. I say ‘not at’ because the idea is not to have Asia and the ‘global south’ reach the consumption levels the west has had but for the west to drop its consumption levels and the global south to increase theirs and the “twain shall meet” somewhere in the middle. That middle point will be a significant drop for the west (‘global north’), however.
- Depopulation. If you have an equation which states X=AxBxCxD and the value of A has the most significant impact because it affects, directly, B, C and D, then, to get X as low as practically possible, it is entirely logical that you concentrate on reducing the most significant term’s (A) value. You can chip away at B,C, and D but you’re ignoring the “elephant in the room”. So, when Bill Gates talks his equation:
P x S x E x C = CO2 (carbon dioxide output).
You can bet that ‘P’ (equivalent to ‘A’ in this case) is the real target (and it is).
It’s a neat little formula because it drives home the point: that for all the Paris climate talks and more affordable Teslas, environmental incrementalism is somewhat pointless. In the equation, P = population; S = services used by people; E= the energy needed to power those services; and C equals the carbon dioxide created by that energy. Population is of course trending ever-higher, as are the services people demand, especially in the developing world which has barely scratched the surface in terms of cars and air conditioning and other modern basics. Those two factors swamp progress in energy efficiency. Gates points out that scientists are calling for an 80 percent drop in carbon emissions by 2050 (and a total end by 2100) to stave off the most dramatic effects of climate change, yet even with more efficiency, the growth in population and services means that emissions will instead jump by 50%.
But back to Her Putridness for a moment:
You remember a few short months ago during this “pandemic” that the G7 had their little get together in Cornwall where Her Putridness attended along with the other jokers called “Leaders”? Did they wear masks? Yes, for the cameras and ‘social distanced’ when they thought the cameras were on them.
But when they weren’t…..
So, the entire legislation and “rules” just didn’t apply to them.
But then we now have this, where the rules don’t apply either:
So while we have vaccine passports being introduced for football games, live events with 500 (indoors) 4000 (outdoors), nightclubs (where, after 12 midnight, the unvaxxed need to leave the premises, like Cinderella, because the ‘virus’ knows what time it is) – see here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-certification-update-23-september-2021/#Late%20night%20venues
Late night venues with music, alcohol and dancing
By “late night venues with music and dancing” we mean any setting which meets ALL of the following criteria:
- is open at any time between midnight and 0500
- serves alcohol after midnight
- has a dance floor or other designated space for dancing; and
- provides live or recorded music, for dancing
If a venue ceased meeting any of those criteria, it would no longer require to operate with vaccine certification.
A pub or restaurant that usually stays open past midnight, with music, alcohol and dancing, will be able to choose whether to continue to operate in a similar way to a nightclub, with certification. Alternatively, they can choose to stop the music or close the dancefloor after midnight, and operate without certification.
Scotland can host 30,000 people from countries all over the world, in a single venue in Glasgow, requiring NO vaccine passport (therefore requiring no vaccination in effect) AND Glasgow locals are being urged to offer the homes open for these unvaccinated (because they all will be because the rules do NOT apply to them) individuals to stay. This is all clear indication that these people know what the game is and the game is “there is no pandemic, virus or climate change”.
But it gets even worse. Have you seen this?
What does it take before the penny drops?
THE RULES DO NOT APPLY BECAUSE THERE IS NO THREAT! NEITHER FROM COVID 19 NOR FROM CLIMATE CHANGE!
During the Black Lives Matter protests and during the ‘protests’ (riots in fact) for the fentanyl loaded criminal and porn’star’ ‘hero’ – George Floyd – there was no enforcement of masks. Why? Because those ‘protests’ were in line with the wishes of the United Nations Sustainability Goals. They were supporting the propaganda which the UN, WEF, Royals and billionaires want to push as part of Sustainability:
Let me explain to those who may read this and not understand the game:
https://theelders.org/news/why-climate-movement-must-unite-behind-black-lives-matter-movement
Who are “The Elders”?
Of Zion, perhaps? Tongue in cheek for those with no humour.
And there’s more:
Peter Bloody “Biko” Gabriel! What exactly does he “advise” about? I loved Genesis (up to “Abacab”) and Peter’s first 5 albums but these ‘do gooders’ are either ignorant pricks or they know what they are supporting. The IRONY of reading Gabriel’s lyrics from “Get ’em out by Friday” should be lost on no-one:
Get ’em out by Friday
You don’t get paid ’til the last one’s well on his way
Get ’em out by Friday
It’s important that we keep to schedule, there must be no delayI represent a firm of gentlemen who recently purchased this
House and all the others in the road
In the interest of humanity we’ve found a better place for you
To go, go-woh, go-wohOh no, this I can’t believe
Oh Mary, they’re asking us to leaveGet ’em out by Friday
I’ve told you before, ‘s good many gone if we let them stay
And if it isn’t easy
You can squeeze a little grease and our troubles will soon run awayAfter all this time, they ask us to leave
And I told them we could pay double the rent
I don’t know why it seemed so funny
Seeing as how they’d take more money
The Winkler called again, he came here this morning
With four hundred pounds and a photograph of the place he has found
A block of flats with central heating
I think we’re going to find it hardNow we’ve got them
I’ve always said that cash cash cash can do anything well
Work can be rewarding
When a flash of intuition is a gift that helps you excel-sell-sell-sellHere we are in Harlow New Town
Did you recognize your block across the square, over there
Sadly since last time we spoke
We’ve found we’ve had to raise the rent again
Just a bitOh no, this I can’t believe
Oh Mary, and we agreed to leaveThis is an announcement from Genetic Control
It is my sad duty to inform you of a four foot restriction on
Humanoid heightI hear the directors of Genetic Control have been buying all the
Properties that have recently been sold, taking risks oh so bold
It’s said now that people will be shorter in height
They can fit twice as many in the same building site
They say it’s alright
Beginning with the tenants of the town of Harlow
In the interest of humanity, they’ve been told they must go
Told they must go-go-go-goI think I’ve fixed a new deal
A dozen properties, we’ll buy at five and sell at thirty four
Some are still inhabited
It’s time to send the Winkler to see them
He’ll have to work some moreWith land in your hand, you’ll be happy on earth
Then invest in the Church for your heaven
You total wanker, Gabriel!
Now, who is Sandrine Dixson-Decleve?
Sandrine Dixson-Declève, co-president of the Club of Rome, says the EU climate strategy is a “systems approach” which attempts to encompass almost all sectors of the economy. “The US has always been driven by the market — and not just the Biden administration. They are missing a trick by not focusing on shifting the economy beyond using technological levers.” she says.
But why is Decleve standing posing with Prince Charles?
Because, as you can see, she was, from 2009 to 2016, the Director of his Corporate Leaders Group.
Prince Philip and Prince Charles have been joined at the hip with the Club or Rome since the Club of Rome began in 1968. Its first formation meeting taking place in the villa near Rome belonging to none other than David Rockefeller.
Now, listen closely to Sandrine before reading and recognising the next element of all of this:
Sandrine Dixson-Decleve – Extinction Rebellion –
https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/Sandrine:b?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
Why Extinction Rebellion get away with their ‘tantrums’ is because Extinction Rebellion are the “militant” arm of Charles, the Club of Rome, the UN and the billionaire set who desperately need you to believe that ordinary people are concerned about climate change. Yes, some are because here is and example of how the conversation goes:
“Are you concerned about animals and biodiversity loss that you keep hearing pumped into you by your media? And did you see the awful weather that’s been happening around the world (forever – way before you were even born and way before the industrial. age but let’s forget about that)”
“Yes”
“Would you like to be an eco warrior who will help this all to stop?”
“Oh yes!’
And that is how easy it is!
What a useful little twat you are Greta! But then, what a surprise:
Thunberg was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in March. But if she wins the prize, she won’t be the first one in her family to do so; she’s distantly related to Svante Arrhenius, a winner of the famous international prize, according to a profile of the young woman in Union of Concerned Scientists.
Specifically, Thunberg’s father, Svante, was named after his distant relative, per the publication. However, the exact connection between Thunberg and Arrhenius is unclear. But thanks to his official Nobel Prize bio, much of the late scientist’s life is known.
Arrhenius was born in 1859 and died in 1927. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1903, for his work in the field. Ironically, Arrhenius’ body of work represented the first calculations that explained how carbon dioxide emissions might lead to what is now the greenhouse effect.
Meanwhile – to go back to the exemptions for vaccine passports during COP 26. It isn’t just the delegates who get an exemption. Just like the BLM exemptions, we have Climate protestors getting exemptions so that the delegates can point to the people out in the streets (who WILL be ushered into Glasgow around the event expressly for this purpose) who are “demanding action from governments!” just like the little autistic robot, Greta Thunberg who’s wheeled into the UN every now and then to “bla bla bla”.
See how easy it is for them to dupe the populations in their “democracies”? “Democracies that they wish to change by the way!
Gabriel wrote another song which is, perhaps, far more apt…
He wrote great songs but, like Bono, became a voice of the pricks oppressing us. What a cunt! I ain’t no monkey you schmuck!
WE WERE TOLD COVID WAS COMING LONG BEFORE IT CAME WHILE HERE, IN JANUARY 2020, THEY TOLD US WHY IT WAS NEEDED!
The above site appears to have blocked this article (on my computer anyhow). I have been linking it everywhere for over a year now:
CHARLES’ DESPERATION TO RELEASE THE $TRILLIONS
But, putting aside the depopulation agenda of Agenda 21 and these criminals for a moment; Here is what is behind Charles and his mother’s seeming hypocrisy (I say “seeming” because it can’t be hypocrisy when they know, only too well, that Climate Change isn’t real):
See and hear Charles desperately trying to lobby for his pet project which will earn him $billions:
His Royal Putridness – Our saviour!
https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/Charlie:2?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
Do you know what “Net Zero” truly means? The balance of world economy such that there is a net zero differential in cost no matter where in the world business operates. Yes, it also means a “cleaner” planet but what does a “cleaner planet” mean? They want. to go back to pre industrial levels of CO2, right? Think back in history: Who owned cars and who owned land and property prior to the industrial revolution? These people will own while you will “own nothing and be happy”. Owning nothing cannot apply to everyone because, for such to be enforced, there must be owners. If you own your home right now, outright, who can take it away from you such that you only rent it? Nobody. YOU are the owner! You decide if you wish to rent it out or not (AirBnb for example). Now, come a time that anyone else can demand what you do with your own property, it simply means they have the power and ownership of it, not you. That said, they will, I guess, not make the changes as abundantly obvious as that.
And remember the 17 Global Sustainability goals from above? Where do the vaccines come in?
HERE:
Who’s “Security” do you think they’re actually protecting? Yours? Don’t be so bloody naive!
Health and military professionals call for urgent action on climate change
A statement calling for urgent action on climate change has been issued by doctors, health professionals and military personnel participating in a London conference on the health and security implications of climate change convened by the British Medical Journal.
The conference – The Health and Security Perspectives of Climate Change – How to secure our future wellbeing – was held at BMA (British Medical Association) House on Monday October 17th. In an unlikely alliance military and health officials came together to discuss the health and security implications of climate change. The health implications of climate change have been discussed for some time. Less well known is that climate change has been taken seriously by military personnel – those working to prevent and manage conflicts around the world: that climate change is also the greatest future threat to security.
The conference was born out of frustration at the slow progress in tackling the causes of climate change at national and international levels. It arose from discussions and an an editorial in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) on climate change, ill health and conflict written by senior physicians and by military personnel at the UK Ministry of Defence. From these beginnings, a loose partnership of concerned organisations emerged, with a common aim of highlighting the urgent need for action.
https://takvera.blogspot.com/2011/10/health-and-military-professionals-call.html
What do you think “Flatten the curve” meant? The increasing cases of a virus? Don’t be so bloody naive!
Hospitals, health services and medical supply chains across the world’s major economies currently generate around 4% of global CO2 emissions. They are also a significant emitter of short-lived yet potent climate pollutants such as black carbon, methane, hydrofluorocarbons and anaesthetic gases. For an industry based on the principle of “first do no harm,” it’s therefore imperative the healthcare industry acts quickly, collectively and globally to mitigate its own climate impact.
We cannot wait for national policies, which will inevitably develop at different rates with different agendas, to set the pace of change. We need to globally unite, quickly, and lead by example, developing best-practice international guidelines and standards for sustainable, climate-resilient healthcare development in the same way our healthcare professionals develop best-practice guidelines for treating patients. It’s going to require technology innovation, outside-the-box thinking and multi-disciplinary multi-sector collaboration, the like of which has not been seen before in the industry.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/health-climate-change-sustainability/
WHY DO YOU THINK YOU”RE GETTING NO, OR SIGNIFICANTLY RESTRICTED ACCESS TO GPs AND HOSPITAL BEDS AND GETTING YOUR TREATMENT YOU NEED?
Because of HER:
Sustainable Hospital beds –
https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/hospitalbeds:d?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
IT IS IN YOUR FACE! NOW WAKE UP!!
Johnson & Johnson ‘executives’: It’s about control
But we knew that! I know!
Covid vaccine: “Hit them in their pocket” “Make them 2nd class citizens” – Johnson & Johnson Yahoo/Sent
To: Desmond Swayne
Cc:esther.mcvey.mp@parliament.uk,Adam AFRIYIE,Steve BAKER,Bob BLACKMAN,Office of Graham Brady,David DAVIS,Chris GREEN,Mark HARPER,Philip HOLLOBONE,Charles WALKER,Boris JOHNSONHideTue, 28 Sept at 15:30
Dear Desmond,
https://odysee.com/@Jadu200:7/Johnson-%2B-Johnson–%27Kids-Shouldn%E2%80%99t-Get-A-F_cking–COVID–Vaccine:2?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
These guys careers have ended! The truth needs to come out, however, and no prisoners taken.
But I’ll tell you the truth: There was/is no virus; No “delta strain” etc. So why the jab? Give it time.
And for all those who got vaccinated because it impacts your lifestyle and job, listen closely!
Coerced into being “1st class citizens” (compliant and ignorant) and forcing the rest of us into 2nd class because we’re not.But we “2nd class citizens” get to have no job (sounds very much like inability to buy or sell if you ask me) and no access to more and more events.Meanwhile, you tories, ‘opposed’ to the measures, are inept, impotent and incompetent. Why? Because you will still play the game.
I’d call you all “Nazis” but, in all honesty, you couldn’t lick Hitler’s boot!
You pout and preen your ‘politics’ and your stances.
Let me just say this: No matter what pressure you bring to bear on me and many like me, we’ll never bend. We may be second class citizens but we’re not first class twats!
You sickening bunch of supercilious, mealy-mouthed excuses for men!
Let’s see what ‘tomorrow’ brings, shall we?
Earthling
One of the recently undead speaks to Talk Radio
Earthling 
2 comments