Earthling

AIDS

Posted in Media, Science by Earthling on February 15, 2015

Why has our media never picked up on this? They love their big stories after all don’t they?

He is totally convincing (to me anyhow) and he’s injecting himself with the blood of an HIV sufferer.

Spanish media covered it but then, it seems, no other country’s media did.

This is spectacular information but, like anything else, if it isn’t given coverage on mainstream media, noone knows OR, if they are exposed to the information, they think it’s bullshit. But then, as has happened so many times now, years later, it comes out and people finally accept the truth because it’s on the BBC. Science is only as good as the media which promotes it.

Tagged with: , ,

George: The Grand Chessboard is at work!

Posted in Media, Politics by Earthling on February 6, 2015

Ahh good old George. Like most MPs he gives you facts (as he does here) but at other times, they are shrouded in misleadings, deception or just plain ignorance.

So Mr Galloway, two things (n fact three things):

1. On your Radio show a few years ago (Talksport), you had a caller who wished to discuss Zbigniew Brzezinski’s “The Grand Chessboard” with you for a moment and as soon as that caller mentioned the name “Zbigniew Brzezinski” you turned to your radio audience and said you would not discuss “Conspiracy theory” even though the man and his book exists. You went on to state that you had not read the book! And then you cut off the caller. I know because the caller was me!

2. You mention the holocaust AND freedom of speech in this clip suggesting you support such freedom of speech BUT you would shout down (and have done it on numerous occasions) those of us who would question (factually and considerately) the entire holocaust story. Just as you say the jews are(sorry zionists) are for ONE type of freedom of speech but not another – SO ARE YOU MR GALLOWAY!

3. Indeed you are correct advising these people (and isn’t it interesting that it is the jews who always seem to come across as a baying flock?) that they are playing a dangerous game by conflating zionism and jewishness. After all, it was zionism which had a very strong hand in the treatment of the jews in Germany in the 1930s and 40s.

Meanwhile Mr Galloway, what would you say to this?

10405543_295068434001530_2943252966791641293_n

As you say Mr Galloway, you are a British Member of Parliament who was not born then while you also would consider that, as a British Member of Parliament, you are shown some respect? After all it is the name of your party.

So, would you show another British Member of Parliament who WAS born in that time and was an MP during that time, some respect by considering his words? So who WAS behind this Zionist organisation smuggling German agents into Palestine Mr Galloway? I am quite sure it was not christian zionists at that time. Chaim Weisman and Lord Rothschild – as you well know – were at the top of this organisation at that time (and you well know the Rothschilds are today also) so please don’t give me this “conspiracy theory” shit of yours again! Otherwise you’re as much a deceptive hypocrite as you call others.

The “Alternative” Paedophile

Posted in Media, Paedophilia, Politics by Earthling on July 6, 2014

Paedophiles in government. Paedophiles in the monarchy. Paedophiles in the media and now, Paedophiles in the ALTERNATIVE media!

I wonder who those could be? I wonder if Davey and Sean (the big mouths of TPV, the guys who keep their spending of the money they raised from you close to their chests, the guys who sell you bullshit while they literally talk a globalist talk, have the hetero haters on the shows and the ex women MPs who have something to hide too) know who the alternative media paedos are? What do you think? After all, Davey knows it all doesn’t he? He knew about Saville (but didn’t say a word before it became public knowledge and then pretended he had said something. Even his ex colleague ran a story – yes Ms Poulton – saying Davey knew about Saville before it came out in mainstream when, in fact, he had never mentioned it at all beforehand but he likes you to think he did).

There is diseased shit under every rock folks so be careful who you consider to be on “your side”.

I have so much more to say about this paedophile eruption. Not exposing any, just commentary. But, right now, I just don’t have the “bandwidth”. I’ll get around to it though.

For now, here’s Bill Maloney – a brave guy I only met fleetingly once but his head was elsewhere I guess at the time. By the way Bill, if you stumble over this: The Bradbury Pound is the entirely wrong answer (sorry to those who believe otherwise).

One of the best things people could do (but won’t) is for them to drop their belief system in “heroes” – either those in uniform or those on the TV and in positions of (seeming) power.

But they won’t and you know why? This is why:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p01zxmrv/the-men-who-made-us-spend-episode-1 (How long this will be on BBC iPlayer I don’t know but it’s the mentality – the “zombies”, those who are so easily led – which maintains the “heroes”. However, as you will see, we’re making “heroes” out of boxes too. The majority of humanity is dumb to the bone and so easy for the elite to manipulate that it’s not the elite – as perverted, sociopathic and psychopathic as they are – who are the problem, it’s the “zombies”. They are who scare the pants off me.)

And if you decide to watch the above and find it at all interesting, you may find the deeper probe into planned obsolescence even more interesting:

We’ll “buy” anything that’s “sold” to us as “Just what you need to be sexy!”

Meanwhile, back to paedophilia. There were once “perverts” and “poofs” – guys who liked to give other guys guy fluid up their ass or to swallow (let’s just call a spade a spade shall we? Or is the reality of it meant to be politically ‘correctified’ and brushed under the carpet like the time they themselves were “in the closet”? But they were given a name: “homosexuals”. Homosexuality was the mane of their “thing” rather than heterosexuality. But you see, having been given a name, the next step (over time) was to ‘normalise’ it and so those who considered it abnormal were then given a name: Homophobes and political correctness (arbitrary policy decided upon by the government(s) which you all know are corrupt – except, as in this case, when you THINK they’re doing the “right thing” under pressure from society (when in fact the elite steer what they want you to accept, you idiot)) put the negative focus on those who disagreed with the normalisation of it.

And it’s all done by ‘grassroots’ pressure groups and academics.

What we now have is the next step in human “enlightenment” which is slowly, delicately (and it will take years/decades just as it did for the homos BUT it will come and all you ‘liberal’ parents out there will have nothing to say and no comeback when your sons and daughters are being fucked (yes let’s call a spade a spade again) by old men and women whose paedophilia has been “normalised”.

Well done Mr and Mrs “Liberal” for being so liberal! 😉 But then perhaps it’s you who want to fuck kids right? But soon any criticism of you will be considered “paedophobic” or “hebephobe”.

 

Paedo natural

 

Why just males? Women are into it too! But that doesn’t fit the media narrative. It’s another attack on men.

All I’ll say to this piece is: BULLSHIT! You have to be one sick mother****** to want to have intercourse with a child!

But no, the academics and the media are working their “magic” again to slowly creep towards the acceptance and normalisation of the paedophile. Lock up your sons and daughters Mr and Mrs conservative because the liberals and the perverts are coming for them. But don’t speak out too loudly because you’ll be labeled and termed a “phobe” and, even worse, an “extremist”. Do you have christian values in this JUDEO-christian country of ours? Oh dear oh dear oh dear. You’re on a list! The tables have flipped and the once oppressed (although they brought it upon themselves for the sake of a sliver of land in the middle east) are now the oppressors and you, Mr and Mrs Christian will soon wear the yellow badge! It won’t be a star however, it will be a cross!

MH370 and the Independent scam

Posted in Disappearance of MH370, Media by Earthling on May 14, 2014

To the INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER in the UK:

ARE YOU FRICKING SERIOUS?

THE SCAM IS THAT PHOTO!

 

Sack your journalist and your Editor! This is either sheer incompetence and they shouldn’t have a job OR this is sheer propaganda on your part for the purposes of promulgating a narrative which has a dangerous and insidious agenda behind it.

OBVIOUS FAKE, COMPOSITE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TWO "IRANIAN" FAKE PASSPORT HOLDERS

OBVIOUS FAKE, COMPOSITE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TWO “IRANIAN” FAKE PASSPORT HOLDERS

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-inquiry-shows-thai-passport-scams-continue-9187928.html There is now, without a doubt, an agenda going on here regarding this MH370 flight. You’d have to be dead from the neck up not to recognise it. We have two separate photos taken of the so called “Iranians” who “boarded the plane with fake European ID passports”. The two photos shown above having one small problem however. The legs and feet of each individual are precisely the same kegs and feet! Now I’ve heard of and seen co-joined twins before but I have never seen two entirely facially different twins who are not co-joined but have precisely the same legs and feet. Whoever this man is holding these photos, he’s a first class plonker! A total moron! Fake legs However, for a so called Independent journalist to actually write a piece around this photo and he is so incapable to see what is in front of his eyes, he should either be sacked on the spot or shot! This is the height of incompetence or, a deliberate agenda. Take your pick Independent. Ah but you can’t sack him can you? He’s a Freelance. No bloody wonder! He’ll be lucky to sell another article after this! Mark Fenn

Skills: Researcher? Have you ever played “Spot the difference” Mark?

You can sack the Editor who accepted this however!

MH370: PM Najib Razak – “Yesterday and today”.

The Malaysian Prime Minister, Najib Razak, is being steered by US and British interests.

While Malaysians and Chinese are throwing their venom at the Malaysian government, they are throwing it all in the wrong direction. Sure the Malaysian government are going along with it but why? Do you think that, politically, the Malaysian government have a strong hand as compared to the British and US governments? Or the Chinese government for that matter?

Here is Najib just a couple of weeks ago:

Here he is on CNN just a day or so ago:

In the first video he’s telling you that he’s relying on Inmarsat and the AAIB in the UK. He’s got no choice. He didn’t have to accept it did he? But then IF he hadn’t informed at the “earliest opportunity” and the media came out and stated that Malaysia had been provided with such analysis but hadn’t accepted it, then he would have to deal with people assuming he and his government were hiding this also. So the man is between a rock and a hard place. He gives a press conference stating the analysis’ results and, to give such results he can hardly then state “But I don’t believe them” can he? So what the hell do you expect him to do? He’s being TOLD to believe them

In the second video, however, while then “couching” his initial disbelief, he is sowing seeds of that disbelief. At the same time it makes no sense whatsoever that we are now told that primary radar picked up an aircraft turning back but they don’t know if it was MH370. If it wasn’t MH370 then they must know which aircraft it was because, if they did not know what type of aircraft and where it was originally heading (therefore have an understanding of the, as yet, unidentified plane’s flight path) then how would they know it had “turned back”? Yes they could say they saw a plane on radar making a 180 degree turn BUT, if they didn’t know the purpose or the destination of that plane, how could they conclude a “turn back”? They also state it wasn’t a threat. How could they know this without first identifying what type of plane it was (civil or military) and how would they not consider something wrong whichever type of civil aircraft it may have been? So they MUST have known what plane it was. If it wasn’t MH370 then which airline was it? And what’s the story behind THAT “turn back”? All of this is ignored.

None of this holds water. So PM Najib is holding back something here but WHY is he? I doubt it’s because he and Malaysia wish to.

However, additionally, in the second video (the most recent with CNN) he will not state outright the plane has been lost (and yet we’re talking about death certificates?) because, as he says, he is considering the families feelings in this. No, he’s not. IF he knew 100% the plane was lost and it was where Inmarsat said it was (forgetting it cannot be found for the moment) then he would be bringing closure to the families (as he already tried to do based on his statement a month ago) then it would be that (and the proof) that would be considerate of the families’ feelings. He’s not stating it’s lost because can’t. The “authorities” have not done a good enough job yet to achieve that level of confirmation needed.

“We are as sure as we can possibly be” says Inmarsat and the “experts” from UK and the US. So that’s a “NO” then. It’s not a yes and when faced with such a direct question “Are you sure?” It’s a yes or no answer. Anything else automatically defaults to “NO”.

There are people who know exactly where that plane is and what happened to it. The rest is a wild goose chase as I’ve said from the beginning. IS it Diego Garcia? Who knows? I don’t. I have only said I have strong suspicions of it being so and why the globalists would carry out such a ‘project’. The ONLY reason why that scenario is deemed “crazy” and not investigated by any “authority” is because the “authority” IS globalist! Why do you think Najib is now submitting his document to the United Nations before releasing it to the people? Why does the United Nations ICAO have to give its “blessing” to the Malaysian government for such a release of information?

Who owns the United Nations? And please don’t say it’s a few countries on the Security Council. Please don’t give me that naivety when it is, with a little research, obvious to anyone who runs that show.

Here’s another thing from Sky News. Notice anything?

MH370 death certificates

 

http://news.sky.com/story/1247069/mh370-relatives-in-death-certificate-fury

It goes on to say:

“A public opinion poll published last week found that more than half of Malaysians believe their scandal-prone government – which has controlled the country for 57 years – is hiding the full truth about the plane’s disappearance.”

A subtle little addition to suggest that the Malaysian government is a “regime” of sorts. Well they all are aren’t they? I’m not making excuses for ANY government. They ALL have their drive for power (and corruption) and the biggest of them are Her Majesty’s government followed closely by the American government (which is just the brawn of Her Majesty and the City of London anyhow).

I have said from the beginning that, at least in part, this whole episode is to destabilise the Malaysian state. I stick to that 100%.

Glad to see, however, that the relatives are not accepting the death certificates. It’s quite obvious that Najib understands why. He IS in between a rock and a hard place and every last word he comes out with while pressured, is going to be twisted by one faction or the other. He can’t win.

Another one:

Search widens Sky

http://news.sky.com/story/1249182/missing-malaysia-flight-mh370-search-to-widen

And it goes on to state:

“The Malaysian government, which has primary responsibility for the investigation, has been accused of mismanaging the search, concealing information about the tragedy and of being too slow to update families of the missing on developments.”

Every shot is being fired at the Malaysian government but very few at Inmarsat, AAIB, UK and American governments. Yes questions may be being asked of how accurate the analysis has been but NO-ONE is suggesting that the information provided could be being provided for nefarious reasons. And yet, not an ounce of evidence or debris to back it all up. 95% of the search area has now been completed and nothing. And yet, it was based upon Inmarsat’s analysis and Australia talking about one ping after another (having the first “ping” seemingly detected by China). Narrowing down and narrowing down the search zone based on so called “pings” yet, in this narrow searched zone, nothing found. Now some are saying (again unidentified US defence personnel) that the search could take years. If that is the case then these pings were not pings from a black box, so what were they? We will never get the answer to that because answers are NOT what they are looking for.

This is a study in trying to cover up a real story and trying to stitch together an “official story” while wearing down the families and interested parties to a point where the official story is accepted (once more) and years later, when it has all died down, a headline or a 7th page news item or news item at the end of the 6 o’clock news, states that debris and black boxes have eventually been found. The actual black box recordings will never be released but perhaps transcripts will – written by officials of course – and the entire event will, like so many others, continue to be discussed here and there as if the official story was real, correct and anyone questioning it, a nutter.

Wear them down. Just keep wearing them down. Add a great deal of confusion and unidentified, anonymous statements and opinions by “experts” to deflect from fundamentals which the majority view as reality because officialdom says so but which, from day one, were highly questionable.

And once more we have people murdered for an agenda and the perpetrators walk away scot free because they are officialdom. The perpetrators construct the story after all.

As they say “History is written by the winners”.

Unidentified woman

Posted in "Terrorism", Gross stupidity within society, Media, Politics, The Corrupt SOB's by Earthling on April 12, 2014

If anyone knows this woman, please call the international criminal court.

She is wanted on suspicion of impersonating a victim of Malaysia Flight MH370, showing a photo of an unidentified alleged passenger.

This appears to be a photo of a woman standing with a photo of a man. The woman has no head and the man is so small and fuzzy with no name attached to either her or him, it could be Brad Pitt in drag with a photo of a chinese rent boy.

Please be advised that psychiatrists are on stand-by to treat anyone who is at all emotionally affected by this photograph and do not have the intellect to state “WHAT THE FCUK?”.

Headless woman

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-27000576

UPDATE: Here is the full photograph released by the Australian and Malaysian authorities:

Abbott woman

UPDATE: Sorry we had a Brittany Spears moment – “Oops I did it again”

We didn’t notice the very wide white strip crossing the photograph before publishing the last update above and, for this, we must apologise. That’s twice we’ve done it now. I really ought to sack our Editor. I keep telling him to wear his glasses but he thinks it makes him look uncool.

malaysia-mh370-passports

 

By the way, listen to Abbott on the video in the link. Notice anything?

He is about to say “locate the black box” and he stops himself and says “narrow down the search”. They have no intention, at this point, of wanting to locate the black box in my view.

Why wouldn’t they wish to locate the black box? Well, how much focus has been put on this entire event and what have been the demands of the relatives? The relatives are not believing much are they? So what do you think are the chances that the relatives would demand to hear the actual black box recordings? Rather than what they did in the French flight situation which was just release a transcript.

Malaysian Airlines MH370: A proven script start to finish

Posted in "Terrorism", Disappearance of MH370, Geo-Political Warfare, Media, Politics by Earthling on April 9, 2014

Ok. Where do I start?

How do I PROVE to people who do not wish to accept that what I am telling them is absolute fact?

If we really do have families of missing MH370 passengers then do these families just want “closure” (it would increasingly appear so) given by people who are lying to them from start to finish, OR do they want to step up the discussion to find out what TRULY happened to their relatives? Or do they just not care because, perhaps, this entire story has been a hoax from the beginning?

It’s up to the families to prove they are actually REAL families! This may sound crazy to people reading this that I am saying this BUT, ask yourself (I have asked myself): Would you, having a loved one on a flight and being told it just “disappeared”, while then being “guided” by one contradiction after the other and amazingly fortunate occurrences, to a conclusion that your loved one ended up at the bottom of the Indian Ocean and NEVER being given proof of this, accept it? You KNOW (because if you don’t you seriously are really quite inept, I’m sorry) that there has been political turf wars going on and intelligence agencies crawling all over it while these same intelligence agents have been “feeding” the story and conflicting messages (precisely for the required confusion which all leads to people simply saying they want “closure”) since the day it disappeared.

Me? I don’t understand you if you are one of those families. I either don’t understand you and, therefore, can never sympathise with you, or you are actually non existent because, knowing what I know and seeing clearly what I see, I KNOW – if it were my relative – that they did not end their lives at the bottom of the Indian Ocean.

So who ARE you people is what I want to know?

1. Inmarsat: Triangulation from a SINGLE satellite! 

This is triangulation –

Triangulation

In trigonometry and geometry, triangulation is the process of determining the location of a point by measuring angles to it from known points at either end of a fixed baseline, rather than measuring distances to the point directly (trilateration). The point can then be fixed as the third point of a triangle with one known side and two known angles.

You need at least TWO reference points – in this case, it would have to be a second satellite OR another plane which spotted MH370 or SOMETHING – a boat at a known set of coordinates. BUT YOU CANNOT TRIANGULATE WITH ONE SATELLITE AND THEN BY ANALYSING OTHER BOEING 777’s FLIGHTPATHS ON COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DAYS AND HAVING NO GEOSPATIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH MH370! If someone did this they should be winning the Nobel prize for physics!

I’d PAY to hear this explanation of how they did it! Even then I wouldn’t believe it!

Watch this IDIOT try and speak to you like a weather forecaster about Inmarsat’s amazing analysis:

 

2.  Black box pings

I wrote about the fact that, to detect such pings, the Haixun or the Ocean Shield would need to be within a mile or two of the position of the plane underneath.

I provided this is back up for my claim:

Signal range

I further support this statement by the following now…

CBS report BB frequency

What does the above tell us?

Quite a few things actually.

1. I mentioned in a previous post re Angus Houston that I did not believe this claim that ocean depth and, therefore, pressure, would have such an impact upon the Black box frequency. What we see now is that it is being said that “older equipment can make the frequency drift”. This is bullshit for one major reason: The manufacturer is suggesting that they have sold a black box to an airline with no “lifetime guarantee” that, throughout the stated lifetime, the frequency will not drift? Then that company should be out of business. It should state in the specification and support agreement that the equipment should be operationally checked at certain intervals. I would then doubt that such servicing checks were not carried out. You DO NOT just casually make a statement like this. Find out who the manufacturer was and ensure Boeing never use them again IF it is, in fact, Boeing who contract out this item. To supply into the airline industry and to people like Boeing, you must go through the most rigorous testing and quality procedures. I know! I can assure you of that!

2. They have introduced the above excuse (no excuse at all as I have just pointed out) along with the pressure excuse AND the battery lifetime excuse (battery lifetime has ZERO effect upon an electronic equipment’s frequency of transmission. It either has enough power to transmit or it dies and doesn’t transmit. It doesn’t act like Robbie the bloody Robot!). Again, they are clouding the issue to cover ever possible way out. BUT they’ve screwed up. You know why? Because, listen to this video once more. It says that the Haixun picked up the signal at 37.5KHz! So, we have a perfectly working 37.5KHz at such ocean depth pressure from chinese analysis but we have a 33KHz signal (a frequency used in ocean echo sounding)  from Ocean Shield because the manufacturer has said at such pressure, the frequency would drift! Caught out in a lie once more! This is incredible stuff!

Now I’ve already said the Haixun and the Ocean Shield HAVE to be picking up completely different signals because they were about 500+ kilometres apart – therefore impossible to be the same source. As it says in the last paragraph above: “It is designed to detect signals at a range of (only) 1.12 miles”. IMPOSSIBLE that the two ships can be picking up the same signal. AND YET, Houston and friends have used those two entirely different signals (if signals at all because I 100% believe this entire thing to be a scripted story) to “narrow down” and, once again, “triangulate”. So now we have two reference sources for the black box being two different ships. The PROBLEM being they are suggesting “triangulation” of ONE target when it CANNOT be the same target!! This really is a joke and it is transparent to any scientist on planet earth!

Here is what they have done by using absolutely incorrect and totally misleading CRAP to have people believe they have narrowed down the search corridor for the black box:

Black box search Black box search 2

 

Points 1 and 2 are about 400Km apart (in these diagrams although, elsewhere, it was stated the ships were 300 nautical miles apart and about 560Km). The ping locator on Ocean Shield has a range of 1.12 miles and the black box is about 3 or 4 Km under the surface. This means the ship has to be directly above the wreckage to detect. So think about that for just one microsecond.

1. The impossibility the two ships have detected the same source so to then draw a line between the two and suggest this line represents where the black box is, is just pure voodoo junk trash! The black box can ONLY be located directly below where either ship is. Now, if you located a 37.5KHz signal (Haixun) and a 33KHz signal (Ocean Shield) and the black box was known to transmit at 37.5KHz, which one would YOU suggest had picked up the right signal? So WHY are they going with the Ocean Shield one at all and almost ignoring the Haixun?

2. IF the box can only be detected by a ship directly above it (which it can only be) then WHY has Houston suggested this ridiculous, misleading strip between point 1 and point 2? Why has he said they have to get even closer to decide to send down a submarine or UAV or divers?

Not ONE ounce of this makes sense and it doesn’t because we are getting fed total bullshit!

 

Addendum:

“Honeywell Aerospace, which made the boxes in the missing Malaysia Airlines plane, said the Underwater Acoustic Beacons on both the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder operate at a frequency of 37.5 kilohertz plus or minus 1 kilohertz.” Not 33KHz then! Even so, I am very surprised at the lack of precision of such a device.

http://www.npr.org/2014/04/06/299671354/electronic-signal-with-aircraft-black-box-pulse

honeywell_black_box_infographic

Honeywell

Angus Houston “There’s going to be an event Aaron”

Posted in "Terrorism", Geo-Political Warfare, Media, Politics by Earthling on April 8, 2014

I wrote the other day about how it was obvious that Angus Houston knew that Black Box “pings” from MH370 were going to miraculously be found. He had made the statement the day before ANY such pings had been detected that he was going to have “big news” last friday.

HOW DID HE KNOW THIS? HOW DID ANGUS HOUSTON KNOW, BEFORE THE EVENT HAPPENED THAT HE WAS GOING TO HAVE ‘BIG NEWS’? HE COULDN’T HAVE UNLESS HE’S INVOLVED IN WRITING THE SCRIPT!!

This is what ANGUS HOUSTON said on thursday. One FULL day before any “pings” were detected. A “BIG” operations announcement. There was NOTHING “big” at all he could have been speaking about BUT what then transpired. 37.5KHz “pings” they are SAYING are from MH370s Black Box.

 

Houston 1 CNN Houston

 

WHY ARE MALAYSIANS AND CHINESE WILLING TO BELIEVE THE BRITISH, AMERICANS and AUSTRALIANS? WHY, WHEN YOU HAVE ALL THIS DATA OVER THE PAST WEEKS TELLING YOU YOU ARE BEING LIED TO (and I honestly believe Malaysia is under pressure by these countries) ARE YOU EVEN ACCEPTING HEARING THINGS LIKE “We may have good news” WHEN IT IS NOT GOOD NEWS TO HEAR CONFIRMATION OF YOUR FAMILY MEMBER HAVING DIED! WHY ARE YOU PUTTING UP WITH THIS?

None of this entire story – from start to finish – has made sense and yet you are accepting it? You’re accepting that if they say they’ve found a black box it will actually be MH370s and not one placed there. You have accepted unexplained garbage from Inmarsat regarding how they “pinpointed” the direction and “location” of the plane when they have not shown the world how they did it. Are you “families” of the victims for real?

“There’s going to be another event Aaron. From which we’re going to take control of Malaysia and most of South East Asia. There’s going to be guys out in the middle of the indian Ocean looking for a plane which doesn’t exist (at least not there).”

Now we have this today re Angus Houston’s “knowledge”. Simply, once more confirming he could not have known he would have “big news” on friday when friday hadn’t happened yet!

By James Matthews, Sky News Correspondent, In Perth
An Australian ship has been unable to re-locate the signals, or ‘pings’, first heard at the weekend in its search for the black box of flight MH370.

Search coordinators say they will continue to trawl the Indian Ocean for several days before they consider sending down a mini submarine to investigate.

The Australian ship Ocean Shield picked up the pinging sound twice, on Saturday and Sunday, [Interesting that it is saturday and sunday. So it was just the chinese ship which picked up anything on the friday while Houston stated on thursday that he had BIG NEWS to come on the friday] but has since been unable to hear it again. [Note: Ocean Shield was 300 nautical miles from the Hiaxun. It could NOT be the same ping! But they have led you to believe it was, so far.]

Search coordinator Angus Houston and Australia’s defence minister David Johnston both said re-locating the ping was the best-case scenario for the search. [WHICH ping? Ocean Shield’s OR Hiaxun’s?]

Mr Houston said: “There have been no further contacts with any transmission and we need to continue that for several days right up to the point at which there’s absolutely no doubt that the batteries will have expired.

“If we don’t get any further transmissions, we have a reasonably large search area of the bottom of the ocean to prosecute and that will take a long, long time. It’s very slow, painstaking work.”

He said narrowing the search area first was critical.

He added: “It is a large area for a small submersible that has a very narrow field of search, and of course, it is literally crawling along the bottom of the ocean.

“That’s why its so important to get another transmission and we need to continue until there’s absolutely no chance the device is still transmitting.” [Another transmission from which boat’s location? They are TWO completely different pings if they are pings at all!]

It would provide a precise target for the Bluefin 21, a mini submarine, to aim for in the next stage of the search.

The plan is to send the mini sub down to the depths of the Indian Ocean and create a sonar map of the seabed.

It would highlight any debris on the ocean floor, which would then be further investigated using photographic equipment. [Where is ANY debris on the surface? If you are so close to the black box then why no mention of even looking for debris on the surface? Are you saying the entire plane just crashed into the ocean, never broke up and submerged itself? Is that what you’re now trying to suggest? This is becoming a ridiculous fairy story! Well it already was.]

If all goes to plan, confirmation that plane wreckage had been discovered would come in the form of a photograph beamed back above the water’s surface. [snore. Beamed back from the water’s surface. As opposed to where? The MOON’S surface? Jesus H fucking Christ! You are really treating people as dumbfucks.]

The transmission of the sound detected by the Australian ship is 33.2khz. This contrasts with the 37.5 kHz which is the usual transmission from a black box. [BIG problem then because 33KHz is the frequency used for Echo sounding and, therefore, THAT is what you could be picking up]

Australian officials say they have checked with the black box manufacturers and it is still regarded as a credible reading. The pressure at the base of the ocean can affect transmission signals. [First I knew! Can you confirm that please? 37.5KHz is 37.5KHz. Prove your assertion!]

Angus Houston: "There's going to be an event…"  Haven't I heard this somewhere before?

Angus Houston: “There’s going to be an event…”
Haven’t I heard this somewhere before?

 

 

But here we have a little “insight” as to what is going on….

China Trying To Scoop Malaysia In MH370 Search
Updated: 3:31pm UK, Monday 07 April 2014

By Alistair Bunkall, Sky News Defence Correspondent

The authorities are, quite rightly, not publicly concluding that they’ve found the plane; but reading between the lines, there are clear signs that they believe this is it.

Tony Abbott, the Australian PM, phoned his Malaysian counterpart Najib Razak this morning to tell him what ADV Ocean Shield had heard overnight. [He could be calling to just synchronise the story!]

That is a sign of how significant this development is. The two leaders wouldn’t speak in person were it being treated as a routine update. [As above.]

And the wheels are now fully in motion to fly the relatives to Perth, maybe in the coming days. The Malaysians are compiling a list of the next of kin. Again, a demonstration of how seriously this news is being treated. [As above. “This is what we’re going to say so get the relatives over for the big newscast”]

No-one has mentioned the Chinese. At least not voluntarily. It was a tweet from Chinese state-run media that got everyone’s hopes up on Saturday evening. Much was made of their find. Pictures from Chinese journalists on board showed Chinese sailors listening to a signal with the correct frequency.

The news took all of us by surprise. [It didn’t Angus Houston. OR, perhaps it did! You see Angus shot his mouth off on thursday which could well have had the chinese say “We want in there first”. Perhaps the chinese know that the west really don’t have a plane to look for down there and perhaps the chinese know this is one big story. So if they hear that the west is going to make a call on the black box, why don’t they get in there first. Perhaps they know the overall story is “Oh dear we found it at the bottom of the Indian Ocean” so all the chinese do is tell their people THEY first heard the pings!” Good internal politics that is.]

The head of the search operation Angus Houston kept his nerve. By rights China’s news should have been relayed to the world by him or the Malaysians. That would have been the protocol. [You see? There’s a propaganda war going on. Angus “kept his nerve”. Jesus! This is so obvious]

A mea culpa: I accused the Australians of losing control of the media strategy.

In some respects I was right, this was not how they wanted the news to break. The Chinese had gone rogue. [Ho ho ho. We’re talking about the lives of 239 people and the media and the authorities are playing some form of cat and mouse game. They should all be hung!]

But I should have given Angus Houston the benefit of the doubt. He has been extremely impressive since taking control of the situation and I think he knew exactly what he was going on over the weekend. [How “impressive”? Tell me Alistair, what exactly has he done? Is it just because of his position and one of the Queen’s men?]

Behind the scenes he was learning about Ocean Shield’s discovery. [?]

On Sunday morning, in between a flurry of questions about the Chinese discovery, he mentioned that Ocean Shield had had an “acoustic event” but details were sketchy. Few of us gave it much thought: all eyes were on the Chinese discovery and HMS Echo steaming towards the area. That was the real discovery. Or so we thought. [None of them are real Alistair. You’re just a western journo creating the name for Angus Houston and you’re transparent as hell]

Clearly, even to me, the two didn’t match up. Either one of them had heard the black box, or neither of them. Given their distance from each other, it couldn’t be both of them. [THAT is true! Thanks for that confirmation.]

Patiently, Houston waited until Ocean Shield was sure about what it had heard, and only then was it announced as a major development. [So then what was the “big news” your hero Angus knew he had on Thursday then Alistair? ;-)]

In their respective press conferences today, Australia and Malaysia have declined to criticise the Chinese but the way they’ve answered questions about them, short and to the point, says much.

China has shown frustration with the Malaysians in particular throughout this past month. They first questioned and then demanded the Inmarsat data be handed over. They allowed their nationals to protest outside the Malaysian Embassy in Beijing. Things like don’t happen without the state turning a blind eye at the very least. [Indeed not. It’s all managed as I have been saying for weeks.]

And the breakthroughs were being made by companies in other countries: the British firm Inmarsat, the French company Airbus, Boeing from the US. [Funny that isn’t it? Ever had the feeling it’s the west running this entire show?]

But I think they’ve also been frustrated with their own inability to find the plane. This was a chance to demonstrate the ability of their technology to the world. A chance to reassure their own people that China is superior. [It’s been a negotiation Alistair]

A chance to say, “don’t worry, we’ve got it; if anyone is going to solve this global mystery, we will”.

They haven’t managed to. [Certain ‘interests’ working behind the scenes Alistair.]

There were 154 Chinese nationals on board MH370 and clearly Beijing has a right to play a major role in the search, but more than once by various senior people I have been told how they are not operating as team players. There are clearly two separate search operations going on and that isn’t helpful. [Exactly, it’s a turf war and a political game start to finish]

It might be a race to find the black box but it isn’t a competition. [oh but it is Alistair. VERY naive of you!]

http://news.sky.com/story/1238723/hunt-for-mh370-pings-delays-sub-launch

 

Ok, two points:

1. “But, again, experts say that the distance between this and the Chinese contacts make it unlikely that both could be connected to MH370.” You’re damned right. So then that makes the NEXT link (after the one below) a heap of crap! Because you cannot “narrow down” when the two pings (560Km apart for a signal that you can only pick up within a very few miles – i.e. 1 or 2) are obviously not of the same source!!

2. “But some experts have questioned whether the listening equipment the Chinese appear to have been using would necessarily be able to isolate that frequency.” So then that, once again, goes to prove that, if it is a 33KHz signal then it is the WRONG frequency for a black box! Why would you WISH to “isolate on 37.5KHz” IF, as said, 33.2KHz is still credible? This whole story is ripping apart at the seams!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26912071

 

 

“Although the 37.5 kilohertz “pings” heard by Australian and Chinese ships on 5 and 6 April have not been confirmed, they have allowed search teams to narrow their efforts.” But this is total utter bullshit! These two pings CANNOT narrow dow the search for reasons just given above! But the MEDIA is doing the job the authorities want by promulgating CRAP to the ignorant! WHY ARE SCIENTISTS NOT SPEAKING OUT ABOUT ALL OF THIS ABSOLUTE SHIT THEY’RE SPEWING?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26923235

 

 

 

MH370: Matthias Chang & Reuters

Having been pointing to the U.S. (Globalists) and affiliated intelligence agencies since just about day one plus providing the reasons as to why they would stoop to such depths, plus providing information about Boeing’s patent for remote control of planes by CIA and, finally, questioning Diego Garcia, I think I can say I am vindicated for doing so.

This is an unannounced “war”. Wars are for political and economic power. 9/11 commenced a few but this just may be the point at which we begin to see mainstream “light” being shed upon who really is behind all of this from 9/11 to MH370. Because it certainly wasn’t (and isn’t) “Al Qaeda”.

What was the last direction that aircraft was pointing in according to radar? Forget this satellite arc crap! Provided by a British company tied to the British and American governments for its entire existence (contracts). But that last known direction does not reflect what the western globalists want us to consider does it? It says “Whoa! I’m going to Garcia!”

MH370-sky-vector-460x306

Disappearance of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH 370: The Trillion Dollar Question to the U.S. and Its Intelligence Services

Malaysian media should pose critical questions to the US and its Intelligence Services and not to the Malaysian Government

By Matthias Chang
Global Research, March 29, 2014
Future Fast Forward

Matthias Chang is a prominent Malaysian lawyer and author, who served as political secretary and adviser to former Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohammad.

Let me state from the outset that I totally agree with the press statements by Malaysia’s Defence Minister and Acting Transport Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein that “we have conducted ourselves fairly, responsibly and history will judge us for that.”

And to a mischievous and presumptuous question from a correspondent of the Financial Times, Datuk Seri with confidence and integrity rightly said without any fear of contradiction that, “I don’t think we could have done anything different from what we have already done.” Well done!

The Financial Times, CNN and other foreign media ought to pose similar questions to the US and its intelligence services and stop insinuating that Malaysia has not been transparent and/or engaged in a cover-up. Foreign media should stop engaging in dirty politics!

It is my hope that following the publication of this article, Malaysian mass media will focus on questioning the integrity of the US’s assistance to Malaysia in the first three weeks of the SAR mission, notwithstanding its recent offer of more assistance.

I take comfort that my reservations about the US and its intelligence services as well as other intelligence services closely linked to the US, especially British secret service, have been more than vindicated by Reuters in its news report on 28th March, 2014 entitled Geopolitical games handicap hunt for flight MH370 (see below)

The search for flight MH370, the Malaysian Airlines jetliner that vanished over the South China Sea on March 8, has involved more than two dozen countries and 60 aircraft and ships but has been bedevilled by regional rivalries.

… With the United States playing a relatively muted role in the sort of exercise that until recently it would have dominated, experts and officials say there was no real central coordination until the search for the plane was confined to the southern Indian Ocean, when Australia largely took charge.

Part of the problem is that Asia has no NATO-style regional defence structure, though several countries have formal alliances with the United States. Commonwealth members Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand and Australia also have an arrangement with Britain to discuss defence matters in times of crisis.

As mystery deepened over the fate of the Boeing 777 and its 239 passengers and crew, most of them Chinese, it became clear that highly classified military technology might hold the key.

But the investigation became deadlocked over the reluctance of others to share sensitive data, a reticence that appeared to harden as the search area widened.

“This is turning into a spy novel,” said an envoy from a Southeast Asian country, noting it was turning attention to areas and techniques few countries liked to publicly discuss.

Ultimately, the only country with the technical resources to recover the plane – or at least its black box recorder, which could lie in water several miles deep – may be the United States. Its deep-sea vehicles ultimately hauled up the wreckage of Air France 447 after its 2009 crash into a remote region of the South Atlantic.

While Putrajaya has been forced to reveal some of the limits and ranges of its air defences, the reluctance of Malaysia’s neighbours to release sensitive radar data may have obstructed the investigation for days.

At an ambassadorial meeting in the ad hoc crisis centre at an airport hotel on March 16, Malaysia formally appealed to countries on the jet’s possible path for help, but in part met with polite stonewalling, two people close to the talks said.

Some countries asked Malaysia to put its request in writing, triggering a flurry of diplomatic notes and high-level contacts.

‘It became a game of poker in which Malaysia handed out the cards at the table but couldn’t force others to show their hand,“ a person from another country involved in the talks said.

As in the northern Indian Ocean, where Chinese forces operate alongside other nations to combat Somali piracy, current and former officials say all sides are almost certainly quietly spying on and monitoring each other at the same time. (emphasis added)

mh370-cockpitatc-talk-shows-nothing-abnormal-malaysia_010414061849WantChinaTimes, Taiwan reported,

The United States has taken advantage of the search for the missing Malaysia Airlines flight to test the capabilities of China’s satellites and judge the threat of Chinese missiles against its aircraft carriers, reports our sister paper Want Daily.

Erich Shih, chief reporter at Chinese-language military news monthly Defense International, said the US has more and better satellites but has not taken part in the search for flight MH370, which disappeared about an hour into its flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing in the early hours of March 8 with 239 people on board. Shih claimed that the US held back because it wanted to see what information China’s satellites would provide.

The above is the reality which we have to confront. Therefore, desist any attempt to label the above mainstream media articles as a “conspiracy theory”. Reuters has let the Genie out of the bottle!

Malaysia’s Minister of Transport Datuk Seri Hishammuddin gave hints of Malaysia’s difficulties (as his hands were tied by intelligence protocols and or refusal by the relevant foreign intelligence services and diplomatic reluctance) but our local media failed to appreciate the nuances of his statements by not directing their questions at those parties that have failed Malaysia as their neighbour and in their duties under various defence treaties and arrangements.

Malaysian media, please read at the minimum three times, the sentences in bold AND WAKE UP TO THE REALITY that our country has been badly treated even though our country put all its national security cards on the table so that countries whose nationals are passengers on flight MH 370 could come forward with sincerity to assist in resolving this unfortunate tragedy which is not Malaysia’s making.

Malaysia is but a victim of this tragedy whose plane, MH 370 was used for a hidden agenda for which only time will reveal.

In my previous article posted to the website on the 27th March, 2014, I exposed how Israel is exploiting the tragedy to create public opinion for a war against Iran, a Muslim country that has close ties with Malaysia.

At the outset of the SAR Mission, all concerned stated categorically that every scenario, no matter how unlikely would be examined critically with no stones left unturned – terrorist hijacking, suicide mission, technical failures, inadequate security, criminal actions of the pilot and or co-pilot etc.

Given the above premise, families of the passengers and the crew of MH 370 have every right to ask the following questions of the US and other countries that have sophisticated technologies to track and monitor airplanes and ships in all circumstances.

Such questions should not be shot down by those who have a hidden agenda that such queries amount to “conspiracy theories”. Far from being conspiracy theories, we assert that the questions tabled below and the rationale for asking them are well founded and must be addressed by the relevant parties, failing which an inference ought to be drawn that they are complicit in the disappearance of MH 370.

 

Lets us begin.

1) Was the plane ordered to turn back, if so who gave the order?

2) Was the plane turned back manually or by remote control?

3) If the latter, which country or countries have the technologies to execute such an operation?

4) Was MH 370 weaponised before its flight to Beijing?

5) If so, what are the likely methods for such a mission – Biological weapons, dirty bombs?

6) Was Beijing / China the target and if so why?

7) Qui Bono?

8) The time sequence of countries identifying the alleged MH 370 debris in the Indian ocean was first made by Australia followed by France, Thailand, Japan, and Britain via Immarsat. Why did US not offer any satellite intelligence till today?

9) Prior to the switch of focus to the Indian ocean, was the SAR mission in the South China seas, used as a cover for the deployment of undersea equipment to track and monitor naval capabilities of all the nations’ navies competing for ownership of disputed territorial waters? Reuters as quoted above seems to have suggested such an outcome.

 

10) Why was there been no focus, especially by foreign mass media, on the intelligence and surveillance capabilities of Diego Garcia, the strategic naval and air base of the US?

11) Why no questions were asked whether the flight path of MH 370 (if as alleged it crashed in the Indian Ocean), was within the geographical parameters of the Intelligence capabilities of Diego Garcia? Why were no planes deployed from Diego Garcia to intercept the “Unidentified” plane which obviously would pose a threat to the Diego Gracia military base?

12) The outdated capabilities of the Hexagon satellite system deployed by the US in the 1970s has a ground resolution of 0.6 meters; what’s more, the present and latest technologies boast the ability to identify objects much smaller in size. Why have such satellites not provided any images of the alleged debris in the Indian Ocean? Were they deliberately withheld?

13) On April 6th, 2012, the US launched a mission dubbed “NROL-25” (consisting of a spy satellite) from the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. The NROL-25 satellite was likely rigged with “synthetic aperture radar” a system capable of observing targets around the globe in daylight and darkness, able to penetrate clouds and identify underground structures such as military bunkers. Though the true capabilities of the satellites are not publicly known due to their top-secret classification, some analysts have claimed that the technology allows the authorities to zoom in on items as small as a human fist from hundreds of miles away. How is it that no imagery of MH370 debris was forwarded to Malaysia, as this capability is not classified though other technologies might well remain classified? (Source: Slate.com)

14) Could it be that the above capabilities were not as touted?

15) However, in December, 2013, the USAtlas V rocket was launched carrying the spy satellite NROL-39 for the National Reconnaissance Office, an intelligence agency which is often overshadowed by the notorious National Security Agency (NSA), only it scoops data via spy satellites in outer space. The “NROL-39 emblem” is represented by the Octopus a versatile, adaptive, and highly intelligent creature. Emblematically, enemies of the United States can be reached no matter where they choose to hide. The emblem boldly states “Nothing is beyond our reach”. This virtually means that the tentacles of America’s World Octopus are spreading across the globe to coil around everything within their grasp, which is, well, everything (Source: Voice of Moscow). Yet, the US with such capabilities remained silent. Why?

It cannot be said that it is not within the realm of probabilities that the US may not want the plane MH 370 to be recovered if rogue intelligence operators were responsible for the disappearance of MH 370.malaysia-mh370-passports

If the above questions have been posed to the US and other intelligence agencies and answers are not forthcoming, I take the view that the Malaysian government ought to declare publicly that our national sovereignty and security have been jeopardized by the disappearance of MH 370 and that the relevant intelligence agencies have been tacitly complicit in the disappearance of MH370.

By coming out openly to explain the predicament faced by our country, Malaysia may prevent a hostile act against a third country.

I therefore call upon Malaysian mass media to be courageous and initiate such queries as only the US and other intelligence agencies can give definitive answers to the above 15 questions.

It is futile to demand answers from Malaysia as we are not in any position to supply the information as we do not have the capabilities of the global and regional military powers.

Malaysians must unite behind the government so that our leaders need not feel that they are alone shouldering this enormous burden.

 

The Reuters article:

(Reuters) – The search for flight MH370, the Malaysian jetliner that vanished over the South China Sea on March 8, has involved more than two dozen countries and 60 aircraft and ships but been bedevilled by regional rivalries.

While Malaysia has been accused of a muddled response and poor communications, China has showcased its growing military clout and reach, while some involved in the operation say other countries have dragged their feet on disclosing details that might give away sensitive defence data.

That has highlighted growing tensions in a region where the rise of China is fuelling an arms race, and where several countries including China, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines are engaged in territorial disputes, with the control of shipping lanes, fishing and potential hydrocarbon reserves at stake.

The Malaysian Airline jet, which disappeared en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing, was last officially detected hundreds of miles off course on the wrong side of the Malaysian peninsula.

As mystery deepened over the fate of the Boeing 777 and its 239 passengers and crew, most of them Chinese, it became clear that highly classified military technology might hold the key.

A reluctance to share sensitive data appeared to harden as the search area widened.

“This is turning into a spy novel,” said an envoy from a Southeast Asian country, noting it was turning attention to areas and techniques few countries liked to publicly discuss.

With the United States playing a relatively muted role in the sort of exercise that until recently it would have dominated, experts and officials say there was no real central coordination until the search for the plane was confined to the southern Indian Ocean, when Australia largely took charge.

Part of the problem is that Asia has no NATO-style regional defence structure, though several countries have formal alliances with the United States. Commonwealth members Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand and Australia also have an arrangement with Britain to discuss defence matters in times of crisis.

“There is … a pressing need for regional security structures to take a few leaps forward,” said Air Vice Marshal Michael Harwood, a retired Royal Air Force pilot and former British defence attaché in Washington.

The risk, he said, was that the search instead became seen as a national “test of manhood” and driver of rivalry.

Already, several governments have been openly competing in announcing findings and satellite images.

RADAR POKER

Malaysia’s acting transport minister Hishammuddin Hussein, who is also the country’s defence minister, has defended the international effort to find the jet.

“All countries involved are displaying unprecedented levels of cooperation, and that has not changed,” he said.

But while Kuala Lumpur has been forced to reveal some of the limits and ranges of its air defences, the reluctance of Malaysia’s neighbours to release sensitive radar data may have obstructed the investigation for days.

At an ambassadorial meeting in the ad hoc crisis centre at an airport hotel on March 16, Malaysia formally appealed to countries on the jet’s possible path for help, but in part met with polite stonewalling, two people close to the talks said.

Some countries asked Malaysia to put its request in writing, triggering a flurry of diplomatic notes and high-level contacts.

“It became a game of poker in which Malaysia handed out the cards at the table but couldn’t force others to show their hand,” a person from another country involved in the talks said.

It was not until a week later that Malaysia announced a list of nations that had checked their archives.

Beijing, meanwhile, was dramatically upping its game.

Its ability to deploy forces deep into the southern hemisphere is particularly striking. Beijing has sent several deployments into southern waters in recent months, including warship visits to New Zealand and South America, while its icebreaker “Snow Dragon” helped rescue personnel from a trapped Russian icebreaker in the Antarctic late last year.

“China are deploying because that’s what great powers do, and there must be a political expectation for them to (do so),” said one former Western military officer. “How well they do it, only the USA will currently know (through surveillance and signals intelligence), and time will tell.”

CHINESE CLOUT

With five Chinese ships heading to a new search area in the Indian Ocean on Friday, experts say China is revealing military capabilities it lacked just a handful of years ago.

Chinese officials have also spoken of the growing number of satellites it has put to the task, a sensitive topic nations rarely disclose.

“A decade ago, China wouldn’t even have been in this game at all,” says Christopher Harmer, a former U.S. naval aviator and search-and-rescue pilot, now senior fellow at the Institute for the Study of War in Washington DC. “It really shows how far they have come, much, much faster than most people expected.”

Ultimately, the only country with the technical resources to recover the plane – or at least its black box recorder, which could lie in water several miles deep – may be the United States. Its deep-sea vehicles ultimately hauled up the wreckage of Air France 447 after its 2009 crash in the South Atlantic.

So far, Washington has sent two Poseidon maritime reconnaissance aircraft to the southern Indian Ocean search as well as an underwater drone and its Towed Pinger Locator, specifically designed to detect the signals from black boxes.

As in the northern Indian Ocean, where Chinese forces operate alongside other nations to combat Somali piracy, current and former officials say all sides are almost certainly quietly spying on and monitoring each other at the same time.

Military secrets, meanwhile, remain the last thing on the minds of those still hoping for news of missing relatives.

“I don’t care about the secrets. I just want my son to return,” Liu Guiqiu, mother of missing passenger Li Le, told China Central Television.

(Reporting by Peter Apps in London, Tim Hepher in Kuala Lumpur/Paris, Additional reporting by A. Ananthalakshmi; Editing by Will Waterman)

Malaysia-Airlines-Missing-Flight-MH370-Could-Be-in-Gulf-of-Thailand

No whites please, we’re British!

Posted in Gross stupidity within society, Law, Media by Earthling on April 5, 2014

“British,” I replied hesitatingly – I could already sense this wasn’t going to end well. “No, I’m White Irish, actually,” I added, self-importantly, having noted that this constitutes a valid ethnicity on every official form these days.
“Sorry, we don’t need any white adoptive parents.”
“But you do need adoptive parents? What about mixed race children?” There was an audible intake of breath at my – what? Ignorance? Insenstivity? Racism?
“We Don’t Need White Couples.”

The fear of a British white mother being made to feel unworthy for being…. well, white British in…….well, Britain actually!

Do you remember a time in the USA when blacks were barred from various things and when they were barred from certain establishments. Barred from owning property.

“No blacks allowed!”

That carried on up to the 1960s to a lesser degree. It was because they hadn’t “achieved” full emancipation. God help them (and us) that they/we have. But have we?

Were you aware that, in Britain, women were the property of their husbands until 1927?

Today we have the same “struggle” for recognition by the homosexual community and others for their “emancipation”.

ALL OF US – yes even men. Even WHITE men – have struggled for various rights throughout the centuries.

HOW HAS ALL THIS BEEN POSSIBLE? WHAT EXACTLY IS IT THAT PREVENTS PEOPLE FROM BEING TOTALLY FREE (EVEN IN THE SO CALLED “FREE WORLD” WHICH BUSH AND BLAIR HAD US BELIEVE 9/11 WAS ALL ABOUT THE “MUSLIMS HATING OUR FREEDOMS”).

Many of you think that we are free and that there is no discrimination (certainly not at state level) in this country. But as I keep trying to demonstrate to you, you couldn’t be more wrong. You think we fill in forms which are about “equal opportunities” for all and, therefore, these forms ask all manners of personal questions such as age, sex, sometimes sexual preference, nationality, religion, colour etc. Can’t you yet figure out that if, in fact, these organisations WERE into “equal opportunity” then they would not even have to ask these questions but simply accept someone because they displayed those skills necessary for any particular role – whether that role was a job or whether it was as a parent?

No. Those forms and questions are purely for the sake of keeping a database which then allows the performance of statistical analysis and if there are deemed (by some body or other) to be too many of ONE type and too few of another in any position, they will positively discriminate to “balance” that “imbalance” – not based upon capability but based upon colour or religion.

Here is the perfect example:

Adoption couples

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/8279525/Adoption-We-dont-need-white-couples.html

And how does this come about? What is the fundamental core of this discrimination and categorisation?

THE LEGAL PERSON

You see, Judith Woods is a human being – yes indeed. The Human Rights Act would have her and us all believe that, as such, she is as equal as everyone else. But in this case, she is not. How can that be?

Because Judith has been categorised and stamped as a WHITE legal person NOT as simply a human being. Further, the Human Rights Act does NOT protect all humans at all. You HAVE no “human rights” unless you are recognised as a person. Before 1927, Judith would not have even been a “person”. Now she is a WHITE person.

And Judith and the vast majority of British, American, French, German, Singaporean, Polish, Italian, Chinese – every country’s people in the world in fact – do not understand this “person” issue. So what do they do? Yes, a few, like Judith, shall complain and, because of it, she may get somewhere with her plight being taken up by the media. But the authorities can handle one or two slipping through the net because what they are doing with this legal person concept is affecting millions in a myriad different ways.

And Judith, if successful, will continue with her life and her adopted child and really think no more of it.

However, what the media will NEVER do – and what the government and courts will never acknowledge – is probe into what exactly the “legal person” is and how, exactly, it is put into practice all across the country, suppressing, oppressing and discriminating against one person after the other.

OUR GOVERNMENT SPEAKS OF CLAMPING DOWN ON ANY AND ALL DISCRIMINATION BUT IT IS TRANSPARENT TO ANYONE WHO HAS A MODICUM OF LOGIC THAT IT IS OUR GOVERNMENT AND COURTS WHICH ARE THE WORST OFFENDERS.

THE LEGAL PERSON ALLOWS THEM THE POWER OF LIFE AND DEATH NOT JUST DISCRIMINATION. WHILE THEIR DISCRIMINATION IS A FACTOR IN LIFE AND DEATH CIRCUMSTANCES EVERY SINGLE DAY.

While there is an additional issue in this: Some people call Nigel Farage a racist for wanting to stop the immigration numbers flocking into this country and this “multiculturalism” getting out of hand – which, I believe it already has (and I love all cultures of people). HE is held up as “racist” for it? – And no, I’m not a UKIP/Farage supporter. I don’t trust him either on a number of fronts. He’s a politician! – But there’s more to this insidious undermining of our British heritage. Not only is our government (in league with the EU) allowing and actively promoting this influx of immigrants to “water down” a British voice against the social and economic policies of our government (and Head of State), but they are actively destroying the white family unit from within.

There is not so much racist hate for others in this country, there is ACTIVE racist hate toward white people.

Who do you think is behind this? While, yes it is our government, remember our government is owned and controlled by others. All the government do is administer.

Once more, I’ll leave you with their own words. And don’t think for a moment it is only this single “lady” and her organisation which is involved. She and it are just one inconsequential part of it.

TPV: David’s finally been rumbled!

Posted in Media by Earthling on April 3, 2014

Well, about a week ago, I put out a blog named “TPV: The people have spoken David”. However, it would seem they have roared. That’s what you wanted though David isn’t it? The people to roar like your Lion?

You should be proud of them. Aren’t you? 😉

Here was the funding a week ago:

People's voice Indiegogo campaign 3

And here’s the funding today:

TPV 14 days left

 

Not only have you just managed to raise slightly over £3000 David and team but you’ve dropped the goal from £250K to just £50K. And it doesn’t even look like you’re going to hit anywhere near that!

I have to admit. I do get a modicum of pleasure knowing that people are no longer falling for it David.

I’m so glad for them!

After all, you’ll get your money. If the state gives you an OFCOM licence then they will surely back that up with the funding you require to do that propaganda job they want you to.

The trouble for them is – Are they investing in a lost cause now?

MH370 “Left Behind”

Posted in "Terrorism", Disappearance of MH370, Media by Earthling on April 2, 2014

Have you been left behind Sarah? 😉

1395952528000-XXX-Sarah-Bajc

No, I am not suggesting this happened. No it is not another theory and I’m losing my marbles. There is just something I wish to focus some attention on.

Is there an element of a sub, sub plot going on in all of this? Why do we keep getting fed emotionally dyslexic “christian” people in all of these events? While it couldn’t have escaped anyone’s notice that, in this MH370 instance, they’re almost playing a “Left Behind” card. If you haven’t heard of the “Left Behind” series of books, they are a christian fundamentalist view of the rapture and have sold millions across the world. I’ve known people (intelligent people and very nice people, even friends) who believe this stuff. There are quite a few of them. We’re not used to such so much in the UK as you know but, in America and around the world, there are a great many people who do. Why do you think the christian televangelists do so well?

Has anyone noticed that Sandy Hook was filled with “Christian believers”. None of them cried and they were all very philosophical about their losses? Another example of this “christian” lack of emotional turmoil in such circumstances is that of the recent murder of Breck Bednar in the UK – the 14 year old allegedly stabbed by his 18 year old video game “friend”. The parents of whom’s first thoughts were to set up a fundraising campaign JUST LIKE the Sandy Hook family victims. The parents of whom also described themselves as “christians” and happen to be Americans.

Now we have Philip Wood and his girlfriend of 2 years, Sarah Bajc, the latter having been on many news-reports now and who shows just about zero emotion (I’ve seen none – perhaps I’ve missed a few) but, again, is very considered, expresses herself well in the midst of this – what you would believe to be – very emotionally upsetting time and she makes subtle, but strong, suggestions of mishandling and the possibility of the authorities knowing more than they divulge. She’s calm, considered and makes sure she just hits some buttons.

Meanwhile, Philip is described thus:

In a prepared statement to the media, the Wood family described Philip Wood as “incredibly generous, creative and intelligent.”

“Phil cared about people, his family, and above all, Christ,” they said in the statement. “Though our hearts are hurting, we know so many families around the world are affected just as much as us by this terrible tragedy. We ask for your prayers, not only for ourselves, but for all involved during this difficult time.”

http://news.yahoo.com/american-father-philip-wood-feared-to-be-passenger-on-vanished-malaysia-airlines-flight-205115030.html

Have a listen to Sarah Bajc:

“Oops! That’s the wrong place.”

Then “It’s just like a magician playing tricks on the audience”

Then “That must be incredibly difficult for you emotionally?” and watch our Sarah – can she put on the teary act all of a sudden? No. That would just be a little too “prompted” and obvious and the question has thrown her a bit of a curve ball.

“Ah..it..it..it’s frustrating!” Frustrating? Not “Yes it is….” as she let’s by a little smile as if her real knowledge of her lack of a need to be emotionally affected has dawned on her and she let’s her guard slip.

Watch Danica Weeks (as she speaks about that wonderful, heart-wrenching story – perfect drama) hold onto her prop (her wedding ring) displaying it to the world. “amazing…amazing” she says – I was a father like she describes and it never made me amazing. He’s ex army (notice she then trips over her words just after this as if she thought “damn it, I never meant to say that”) but while there is the squeaky, croaky voice and the pained expression and sniffs, there is not a single tear. Eyes as dry as a kangaroo on a barbie on a Brisbane midsummer’s day.

A family member simply stating what he does but does not want his face shown? Yes there can be various reasons for this I suppose but…..

Add all of this to the two South African girls’s story about sharing the cockpit with the co-pilot 2 years ago and the fact that that is now a proven lie and add the innumerable “leads” and “leaked information” given by a score of “unnamed sources” which then go dead but do the job of confusing the entire picture. Add the photos of the “stolen passports Iranians” with the same legs.

Meanwhile, watch this footage of the chinese protestors:

Look at their placards. A good number of them all, obviously, having been made/designed by a single source. This is managed. Think about any large protest in the UK (or anywhere) where it has been honestly grassroots. There are very few I admit but there have been some. They tend not to have a “brand design” of placard or flags or whatever. The Trade Union managed protests and “official type” protests do however. These people protesting the Malaysian embassy in Beijing have been put together by a controlling element. No doubt about it.

There is a whole lot more as you know but, with all of it, it is quite clear that this entire event is another “Sandy Hook”. It is stage managed from start to finish. These people can snigger at fooling so many but sorry, it ain’t working on me. It’s another “9/11” while now we’re being told they may never find the wreckage and there may never be an answer. The PERFECT place for them to say the plane went down is where they say it did and that is for their purpose. Just like Bin Laden and his “watery grave”.

And finally, just found this. Icing on the cake for me re this “Sarah Bajc”.

 

Oh just one absolutely final thing though: How is it that, in any of these stories, there is never the following –

“He was a bastard who, while we lived as a family, happily in Singapore and his big expat contract, he went around cheating on me with all these 19 year old Thai girls and ended up leaving me and our three kids in Singapore to shack up with one in Jakarta!”

I only say that because it happened fairly regularly and, in this instance, specifically, to an American woman friend of ours who turned out to be a complete bitch after stupid me actually took pity on her. Ah you live and learn Tammy don’t ya? 😉

The whole event of MH370 however: What a narrative! It’ll make a great blockbuster movie in a few years. I am now of a mind that there are two possible scenarios: 1. The flight never existed and 2. Diego Garcia (but not “Philip Wood sticking a phone up his ass. THAT, to me is pure disinfo perhaps to use as a “hook” to say “People that suggest DG are crazy”). This “independent journalist, “Jim Stone” is total disinfo in my view. One thing: I had never heard of him until now and another, he’s proffering this total crap.

BBC & CNN in false flag cover-up

Posted in "Terrorism", Media by Earthling on March 29, 2014

This is why the BBC, CNN and most (if not all) of the mainstream media can be stated as complicit in murder and genocide.

These Corporations and the people working for them have no humanity, no heart, no soul. The ONLY thing they are interested in is keeping their jobs within a controlled corporation which pays them well but censors them and controls their output. The people working within these organisations however, are scum of the highest order. They will do as they’re told for the sake of a buck and help create the prison and the genocide and make excuses for it.

The only silver lining is this: THEY will also, down the line, be victims of what they have supported.

Turkey plans a false flag pretext to war with Syria using “Al Qaeda” (a non existent organisation which is, when you get right down to it, simply paid off mercenaries funded by the western governments and their intelligence agencies or, more correctly, globalists) and the BBC, CNN et al, literally cover it up.

And you think MH370 reporting by these same globalist rags and media and the shit you’re being fed by Inmarsat is “all true”? It’s all step by step writing of a generally, pre-determined script.

Keep swallowing world, keep swallowing. Keep saying “No, there must be adequate explanations for all of this”. Keep believing in the world your eyes see and the world your ignorance wants you to. Because then you have the excuse of saying “I wasn’t aware otherwise I would have done something”. “Seeing” all of this takes you to a dark place. It takes you to a place where, all of a sudden, you recognise the world you thought was “just how it is”, and sane, and “necessary to be how it is otherwise it wouldn’t be” is revealed for what it really is. What your worst nightmares wouldn’t even live up to. You’re surrounded by a world of fiction. Your life means nothing. Whatever you try to achieve is hampered by that fiction and the rules and bullshit which is propped up by those for whom that fiction exists.

You don’t believe in evil. You explain it all by “mistakes” or by “pockets of evil” like Saddam Hussein or Hitler or whoever has been promoted to you as the epitome of evil. These people being nothing in comparison to the true evil. That evil which funds them. That evil which manipulates and manoeuvres every one of them and that evil which remains in the background. But that, to you, is all “conspiracy theory”. Because that is what this very same evil and these very same media outlets which literally protect this evil, use to demonise those who can see it for what it is.

That’s also why they wish to remove “GOD” from your life. No, I don’t mean the christian “God” or the Muslim or jewish or any other “God” specifically. I mean “God” as in “goodness” which is also tied up with knowledge and recognition of evil. By the breaking down of family. By the dogmatic teaching of the new generations that “Do what thou wilt” is the whole of the law.

Breaking down society, family, even pubs. Yes pubs where people used to congregate and create bonds and discuss events.

Breaking down truth for the replacement of truth by a correctness which is incorrect for correct does not need a descriptor such as “politically” before it.

Banning words, banning thoughts, banning beliefs, banning everything and anything which does not follow the requirements of the state which wishes to mould their degenerate society. Human Rights which are provided to some but not to others. Achieved through the manipulation of the construct called the legal person. Wearing a christian cross can cause offence to muslims. No, it doesn’t but they will ensure that there is a muslim or muslims somewhere who will kick up a stink about it because the state wants that. It works into their agenda. Or human rights for homosexuals and if you as a heterosexual speak up it’s “hate speech” while the homosexual who castigates heterosexuality as evil (read Peter Tatchell) is not “hate speech”. Again it works to the agenda. Just like the “jews” who scream anti semitism but their hate for christianity is swept under the carpet. Of course it is. The state wants christianity and heterosexuality destroyed.

And the corporate-owned, mainstream media continues to promote and support it all. Genocide, destruction, paedophilia, murder. As you sit back with your Page 3 and your OK magazines and “Hello” and Kim Kardashian, the football and X Factor, Coronation Street, who’s shagging who, who’s posted a tweeted “selfie” and the never ending mass of shit which they know keeps you occupied.

God save the fucking Queen!

Gay TV

Posted in Media by Earthling on March 29, 2014

Now it becomes all so clear.

On the stroke of midnight last night, a little gay guy (I was not sure he was until now) made sure that, being in the media himself, he gets press for being one of the first gay “husbands” in the UK. And the media always make sure to cover their own and give them that much needed publicity which, in this case, Sean Tabatabai’s “marriage” certainly was.

Now all the tweets and the TPV predilection toward homosexuality and porn and, of course, their love affair with Peter Tatchell and transvestites etc all make the sense I had already sensed but could point to nothing specific which held it all together.

The “Guardian on the gates of the ethos” indeed.

Homosexuality, in a political sense, is a globalist movement and is being used to destroy the family. If you call yourself “awake” and you don’t understand something as well documented and easily understood as this, then please, don’t talk to me about your “awakened state”. You’re an ignorant twat. (Another few hundred readers have gone “poof”!)

They need to destroy the family to get at the children (physically with paedophilia and mentally with the NWO dogma being taught to them and their believing the state is their family). So all you “progressive” heterosexuals out there with children who are so “it’s the 21st century man” are fucking idiots! – just sayin’. Just like your acceptance and acquiescence all these years to the brainwashing of “political correctness” which now has you shitting yourself to speak your mind and, therefore, controlled. It has been that very same political correctness which has heralded in the gay state, the human rights of paedophiles and murderers and terrorists. And there you sit, complaining of it all and complaining about the paedophilia, the porn, etc. All of it brought about by your acquiescence to politically correct homosexuality. Do you flaunt your heterosexuality in parades up and down the country? But you’ve allowed theirs for decades and more and more, blatant sexuality has been spread over your screens and your kids have seen it while more and more of you – hetero or homo – as parents of children, have splashed your scantily clad bodies with your tattoos and your words on your profiles, across social media sites and online dating sites.

Every single one of you who has, has brought this society to what it is now as you sit and complain about your lot in life. You fucking deserve it!

Tabatabai

But now this makes sense:

Another nice little tweet from the "enlightened" Sean Tabatabai

Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai

The words of an "enlightened" man. Rather misogynist but I'm sure Icke's female fans will forgive him. After all, it's only a joke right? Fish and slags. :-)

The words of an “enlightened” man. Rather misogynist but I’m sure Icke’s female fans will forgive him. After all, it’s only a joke right? Fish and slags. 🙂

Then again, perhaps there's a reason for those descriptive words toward females? :-)

Then again, perhaps there’s a reason for those descriptive words toward females? 🙂

So all you “ladies” who are so tuned in to this “The People’s Voice” in the belief it’s all about love and respect and truth, you keep believing while the guy (can you call him a guy?) who runs it along with his bum-chum, Icke, considers you slags and smelling like fish because you’re women.

You keep believing honey!

While Icke’s son already gave the game away about the plan – from day one – to be on satellite and voila! 6 months later, they’re coming to you all for your money once more to make it happen (but no, they never intended to get an OFCOM licence oh no! You thick TWAT!):

Gareth Icke SKY

Now how did the young Icke know that “not originally but eventually”? In October last year!

How dumb a fuck do you wish to be taken for?

And they’ll launch. Your money or not, they’ll do it and you know why? Because I have said from the beginning, there are backers/funders behind this little bunch of sharks.

YOUR money is just being used for “slush funds”.

Meanwhile, I have to ask the question – although I have my own opinion: Is David Icke bisexual? Because you meet him in person, there’s a lot going on behind those eyes. Those eyes hide something very very deep.

Sean Pagan

TPV: The people have spoken David.

Posted in Media by Earthling on March 28, 2014

Do you ever get the feeling that, somehow, David Icke and friends are being told something they just don’t wish to hear?

From the original launch last year of their first Indiegogo campaign, asking for £100K then increasing it to £300K and getting it with no problem because a vast number of people “believed”; To now this – is it the third or fourth campaign? I’ve lost track. I think it’s the third. The second one asking for £400K (greedy bastards) and getting £100K. The first one, remember, all about getting “state of the art” equipment and premises which you kitted out for him and them, paid their wages etc then were provided with a third (or fourth) rate, dismal “tv station” which was, with that money, actually meant to have had studios in London and Los Angeles but, at the end of the day, they couldn’t even get London working right. A complete hash. A total disaster. Meanwhile, the promoted Sonia leaves under a cloud of financial “misadventure” by the station and about £260K of cash which had always been in Icke and Tabatabai’s company bank accounts but not a penny taken from it for THEIR business venture because they saw a gravy train- their own “central bank” creating money from nothing just for them. Who or what was that “Central Bank”? It was you!

And yet, here we are, 6 months from launch of that disaster, and the same people telling you they are going to broadcast via satellite (always the intention as stated by Icke’s son very early into first broadcasting as TPV) and the only way they could have had that planned was by having something which they said they would never have – an OFCOM licence. And yet they do – suggesting they were forced into it (with no non compliance dance by David) – and it would always have had to have been the plan.

So they’re looking for another £1/4 million from you and, with that, they are just dropping the “state of the art” equipment you already funded and the premises you already funded and have found new premises and a satellite to take them (not quite) global. It looks like they aren’t even covering America! One MAJOR market for them.

But, it would seem from this below, that the people aren’t “buying” it anymore. And, in fact BUYING it for you David.

And that is only a good thing in my view because it means those who, perhaps, thought they were awake before are now, seriously awake and far more discerning. Ironically, something David actually wishes them to be. Just not toward him.

People's voice Indiegogo campaign 3

TPV 2

 

So congratulations folks. I’m proud of you. “6 million views” but can only achieve £11K so far. One year ago that figure would be around the £150K by now.

Sorry David. You can fool some of the people some of the time…. you know the rest.