“All westerners look the same to me” says MH370 DCA Chief
Malaysian DCA chief, Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, having yesterday advised reporters that the two passengers using faked passports on MH370 looked like Balotelli, the Italian footballer, has now been asked how the photo of one of those passengers, now released, is of an arab/Iranian looking man?
Mr Abdul Rahman has, as yet, given no official reply but sources close to him have alleged that he stated, in private “All these bloody westerners look the same to me!”
“We’ve looked at the footage of the video and the photographs… it is confirmed now that they are not asian looking males.”
When asked by a reporter “If they are not asian looking males then what are they looking like?”, his response – through some hilarity coming from the audience for some reason – was “Do you know of a footballer by the name of Bartolli?… Balotelli? He’s an Italian. You know how he looks like?… I don’t want to dwell about it but they are not asian looking.”
So here is Balotelli:
And here is the released photo of one of the fake passport passengers just issued today:
Now here’s the question: Will ANYONE now challenge either Mr Abdul Rahman or the other investigators and ask how they can possibly come up with something so inexplicably insane as they did yesterday. They had the photos, they looked like Balotelli – they then release one of the photos and it looks like a clean cut middle eastern student.
WTF?
Has Balotelli been taking tips from Michael Jackson?
Update from BBC Asia:
The Balotelli twins!
And not a word in the article referring to Balotelli or the statements made yesterday as to what these pair looked like.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26525281
This really is the Twilight Zone folks. You truly are living in it!
Queen Elizabeth: You’re trash “ma’am”
What, exactly, is a “Troll” when the word is used so liberally in the internet world?
I’ve found myself called it myself for simply dropping ONE comment on a page stating my opinion. The Mirror, here, seems to be using the same “tactic” – for want of a better word which eludes me at the moment – of calling people trolls. I always assumed that a troll was someone who would simply either post something over and over again to the same forum or someone who would “follow” another individual and continuously comment in some irritating or threatening manner like a stalker through cyberspace. That would be my definition of a “troll” anyhow. But an individual just simply stating their opinion on an open forum once or twice can hardly be labeled a troll because that would mean everyone who ever posted a comment on a social media network site would be a troll!
No, what it appears to be, is another example of the establishment (or anyone else really) who simply wishes to use some pejorative to create another “layer” in the social fabric mindset which suggests that you don’t wish to be labeled such because it’s like being labeled a homophobe or a racist or even…wait for it… a “conspiracy theorist” So, anyone who has an opinion and is willing to state it when another then reads it and doesn’t agree or like what they read, will be labeled by the latter a “troll” just like the days at school when one of the ‘A set’ would label one of the other kids in some derogatory fashion hoping the rest would follow his/her lead.
We are literally back at kindergarten folks and “The Mirror” is leading the way. A “journalist” no less. No debate on whether the posters may have a point – which, of course, they most certainly do – but such a debate gives the other side a voice doesn’t it? That said, if the Mirror’s idea is to not give the other side a voice then they’re showing their mental incompetence (no surprise then) by actually publishing an article and providing an outlet for that voice, whether the Mirror wishes to be derogatory toward the “trolls” or not.
Certainly, the comments are extremely derogatory regarding the Royal family but then, when trash is trash, you call it trash. You call a spade a spade don’t you? If you don’t then I don’t wish to know you because you are obviously one of those politically correct, brainwashed, brain-dead morons and I have known a few of them in my time. I was even related to such a clan at one point. Never again! 🙂
The point is, I don’t need to tell you (and nobody does) how parasitic this family is. It’s clear as day. Yet you still have the ass lickers as in the following photo:
Just look at them stand there smiling. So happy to be able to have a story to take away of the day “I met Prince Philip”. WOOPEEFUCKINGDOO! You got to meet some old, rank codger who’s been abusing you and your families for decades while you fight for him and his clan thinking you’re fighting for freedom! God I detest you assholes. So, if the order ever does come to shoot the dissenters, go ahead. I’ll ask for no mercy from you ignorant grunts. How’s your ma doing? Getting on well with her pension while she’s wrapped up in blankets because she’s in fuel poverty? Well that’s British democracy for ya in 2014 Private! Can I just say your “protection” of the “realm” is shit!
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-royal-family-labelled-parasitic-3218400
While the bitch of Buckingham and family make serious millions per year (that’s ignoring the hidden investments) and yet how much of that enormous wealth would it have taken for her two cousins to have been given a decent life in one of the many palaces and private homes of the royals which litter this country? For most people, it is a lack of financial capability to give their family members what they would like to if such a family member is handicapped or ill in any way, but you have absolutely no excuse.
But let’s even ignore the money and finances needed to take care of your own family. Let’s look at the fact you hid them away and then actually made out as if they were dead decades ago. That takes a special kind of trash that does “ma’am”. But then you’re a royal so you certainly are “special” kind of trash aren’t you? But it also reflects you and your clan’s eugenicist leaning so well. You could not possibly have the country perceive anything but perfection in your “blue bloodline” now could you? So what happens if the new baby Prince ends up with autism or something worse? Though I’m sure that will never happen because I’m sure there will be no mercury being pumped into his veins now will there? No massive doses of chemicals for our future King (hopefully, you’ll all be a bad dream by the time he’s ready to be King).
You’re not only parasites “ma’am” but you psychopaths and trash. The worst sort of trash too. I’d rather bow to trailer trash than your sort of trash “ma’am”. They’re worth so much more than you in human terms. They’ve truly been unfortunate. You’re just simply inherently, trash.
No, I’m no “Troll” ma’am. This is MY page! It has no “Crown copyright” on it!
So, if you please ma’am – Piss off!
To think the poor women even curtsied to an animal like you if they saw you on the TV.
Tell Phil he needn’t come BACK as a virus, he already is one!
One does have one’s standards you know and not one of your brood meets mine!
UK law: Protects freedom of belief but kills freedom of belief
A philosophy and law class 100 years from now:
Teacher: In the first decades of last century, the law in the UK considered itself the best in the world, particularly when it came to Human Rights. England had spread English law to the four corners of the earth and was very proud of that achievement. We must ignore, for the moment that it had been achieved centuries earlier, by force, under what was termed the “British Empire”. By the late 20th century and early 21st century however, the British had destroyed their very own law within the borders of their very own country while, ironically, English law still remained the law of the land in far flung nations such as Singapore, Canada and many more. It was a funny old time when, even the British population never recognised this had happened. Of course, it was due to the English Queen, through her government, handing sovereignty to what was then known as the European Union and it was the EU, from then on, which dictated what the law was and what it was not.
Strangely, the EU adopted principles of the United Nations Charter for Human Rights where one of the fundamentals were that a “person” had the right to “Freedom of Religion”, but, for some reason or other, it didn’t always work out the way it was intended to. Or, perhaps I’m wrong; perhaps it was intended to work out in these various ways. What I’d like to hear from you class, are examples of when this so-called “freedom of religion” went right and when it went wrong in practice within the UK law courts.
Janey, how about you starting us off. Give us an example of when it went wrong, when such freedom of religion and thought and expression was not upheld by the courts.
Janey: Well Mr Cohen, I believe here is an example of it going wrong. A christian couple were barred from fostering a child because of their christian beliefs:
Teacher: Nooooo Janey! These people were nasty, homophobic, dangerous subversives! Their belief was simply a smokescreen for their hatred of homosexuals and imagine if the child had turned into a homosexual. He/she may have been murdered by the couple and eaten! That is NOT a good example Janey!
What about you Shlomo? Can you give us an example of when it went right in the courts lad?
Shlomo: Yes Mr Cohen. There were times during those days that cases would arise attacking the jewish faith for what the “heathen gentiles” suggested was sexual abuse of children by rabbis and the parents of jewish babies. Ridiculous, I know, but true. Some even suggested that the practice of slicing off a boy’s foreskin before a man then bent over and sucked his dick and drank his blood was nothing short of satanic ritual and hideous paedophilia. But the courts upheld the activity recognising that jews were the master race – no, sorry that was Hitler who said that about the Aryan race – I mean the “chosen ones” – means the same but sounds nice and fluffy.
Teacher: Indeed Shlomo. Anti semitism was rife in those days, as it had been for thousands of years. They would use any excuse and any simple little action of any kind by a jew to smear us. But that was freedom of religion and expression and the British courts (and most courts throughout the world) upheld the jewish faith.
Janey: So you’re telling me that just to say you didn’t agree with the lifestyle of a certain group was a crime but sucking a baby boy’s dick, drinking his blood and slicing off part of his penis was ok? Who the hell WERE these “jews” you talk of that the world overlooked their crimes, their sickening rituals etc? They sound like barbarians to me!
Teacher: Janey! You will be held in detention for that outburst! There is a wide gulf between expressing such a thought as these obviously bigoted, disgusting christian people did and following the teachings of the great Lord almighty and you’d be advised to understand that otherwise you may get yourself in more trouble. In our world now, in 2114, we are lucky that the world is now one and we all recognise the God of Mount Zion. One must remember, however, that it was these great atheist jews who came before us who put the pieces in place to allow this to happen.
Off you go now to your next class. Hail Zion!
Class: “Hail Zion!”
Teacher: Janey! You stay behind……. remove your skirt and bend over!
Janey: Oh my god! YOU’VE had that ritual done on you haven’t you?
Teacher: Yes Janey and, without the blood sucking, you’re going to perform it on me. I’ll show you how it isn’t quite as bad as you think sweetie!
“Mere concepts of morality have no business being law”
Yes you read that right. From ZETA – a group of what I guess we have to call humans who like to fuck animals.
So, by the same token, the mere concept of morality regarding sexually abusing a child or even murder have no business being law. If this is the way you want your world to go and this is the world you want your children and grandchildren to live in, then just keep liberally accepting the “progressive” laissez faire and “live and let live” and “Do what thou wilt” culture of depravity that just keep creeping along while our governments don’t listen to the moral concerns of most people but give way to the well funded minority groups who lobby. When did you ever hear of a group of lobbyists for “normality”? Never.
First homosexuality
then bisexuality
then omnisexuality (anything goes)
paedophilia
One thing though: When did you ever hear of a donkey speaking a language and, therefore, giving consent? Or do the zoophiliacs suggest that “Eee haw” is chinese for “Yes please”? ‘Mere concepts of morality have no business being law,’ said ZETA chairman Michael Kiok. Just state it is a “lifestyle choice” and demand your “human rights” to make such a choice and hey presto! You get a licence to shag a sheep! But people like Dharmabro (an ex commenter on here) can’t really say anything against it (thereby supporting it) because, as he says “homosexuality is natural and exists in the natural world”. Yes Dharmabro it does. Just as cross species sexual activity does, therefore, that MUST be ok too. You can’t argue with that otherwise your entire reasoning for homosexuality being “natural” is damned – which, by the way, it is. So what we have here is the homosexual community, simply by their own reasoning, support bestiality. It might not be their preference BUT, if they speak out against it, they are hypocrites and, not only that, they are zoo-o-phobes! Now you don’t want to be labeled a “‘phobe” of any type now do you homos? So what’s your way out? I can’t HEAR you! 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352779/Bestiality-brothels-spreading-Germany-campaigner-claims-abusers-sex-animals-lifestyle-choice.html What I find strange with this comment re “his once friendly flock of sheep were beginning to shy away from human contact” is that do the new batch of sheep never see the older batch being taken away by humans and slaughtered? Doesn’t it even occur to them? Stupid sheep! But then who are we humans to talk? We ignore the shearing of ourselves by the governmental and banking shepherds. BAAAHH!
“Mere concepts of morality have no business being law”
And there lies the entire problem because, in fact, as has been stated by the lawmakers themselves on many occasions, morality does not enter into it. In fact, lawyers I have personally been up against stated such in their reply saying they believed my argument to be a moral rather than legal one. It was both but, nevertheless, they had the audacity to state it.
Googleworld: A law-free oasis for human experimentation
You want human experimentation?
You think it was just what NAZIS carried out?
Google wants a lawless Google run corporate state and they’ll get it. They are the darlings of Obama, Rothschild and are at the forefront of the drive toward transhumanism. Corporations are taking over and the Corporations will dictate to the state.
It is truly in your face now. But the new generations will go for it. It will be very trendy, very cool and the world wants freedom doesn’t it? So what more freedom can you have than no laws?
“I think people naturally are concerned about change, and certainly not all change is good, and I think, I do think the pace of change in the world is changing,” said Page, “Part of what I would think about is, I would think that we haven’t adapted mechanisms to deal with that.”
The sort of mechanisms that Page wants are a place removed from the rest of the world, with out laws or regulations, where tech people can test out new ideas.
He compared it to Burning Man, a huge festival in the desert known for drugs, partying, art, and music.
“You know, I like going to Burning Man, for example. Which I’m sure many of you have been to. That’s an environment where people can try out different things and not everybody has to go, and I think that’s a great thing too,” said Page.
He continued, “I think as technologists we should have some safe places where we can try out some new things and figure out what is the effect on society, what’s the effect on people, without having to deploy kind of into the normal world. And people like those kind of things can go there and experience that and we don’t have mechanisms for that.”
Page also said earlier in his answer that he thinks certain laws can’t possibly be right because they’re 50 years old. Specifically, the laws that govern companies going public are so old and archaic that they’re irrelevant.
“If you look at the different kinds of laws we make, they’re very old. The laws when we went public we’re 50 years old. A law can’t be right if it’s 50 years old, like it’s before the Internet, that’s a pretty major change, in how you may go public,” said Page.
So, in summation, Page would love a totally separate world where he could deploy new tech ideas without fear of government interference. If you wanted to be a part of this world, you could come. If not, don’t.
Page is worth $23 billion, according to Forbes. His Google co-founder Sergey Brin is worth $23 billion. Together, if they really wanted, they could build this techno-utopia. They just have to buy the land somewhere.
Here’s the full transcript of Page’s comments:
I think people naturally are concerned about change, and certainly not all change is good, and I think, I do think the pace of change in the world is changing. Part of what I would think about is, I would think that we haven’t adapted mechanisms to deal with that. And maybe some of them are old institutions like the law and so on aren’t keeping up with the rate of change that we’ve caused through technology. If you look at the different kinds of laws we make, they’re very old. The laws when we went public we’re 50 years old. A law can’t be right if it’s 50 years old, like it’s before the Internet, that’s a pretty major change, in how you may go public.
Maybe some of you, or the million people watching who love technology, maybe more of us need to go into other areas and help those areas improve and understand technology and I think that’s not happened at the rate it needs to happen.
The other thing in my mind is we also haven’t built mechanisms to allow experimentation. There’s many, many exciting and important things you could do that you just can’t do because they’re illegal, or they’re not allowed by regulation, and that makes sense, we don’t want the world to change too fast.
Maybe we should set aside a small part of the world …
You know, I like going to Burning Man, for example. Which I’m sure many of you have been to. Yeah, a few burners out there. That’s an environment where people can try out different things and not everybody has to go, and I think that’s a great thing too.
I think as technologists we should have some safe places where we can try out some new things and figure out what is the effect on society, what’s the effect on people, without having to deploy kind of into the normal world. And people like those kind of things can go there and experience that and we don’t have mechanisms for that.
So those are the kinds of things I would think about.
I also think we need to be honest that we don’t know the impact of changes and we should be humble about that. I’m not sure getting up on stage and saying, ‘Everything is amazing’ and so on is the right way. We should launch things in a more humble way and see what the affect is and adapt as we go.
So, those are my thoughts.
The minds of those who defend “our” realm
The big mistake in the title of this blog being the use of the word “our”.
This guy thinks he has the right to start a nuclear war which would very probably wipe out your family, my family and most of the population of this country. He believes he has that right because he works for something greater than him (and therefore, most definitely, greater than you, you pleb), a democracy and he doesn’t even question another man’s judgement. One man, the PM (and let’s not forget the crap which was Iraq, or, for that matter, Libya) makes a decision and this twat will do whatever this one man says. So, in a nutshell, it doesn’t matter who sits in the office of PM – Tony Blair, David Cameron, Mickey Mouse, David Icke even (imagine that lol), this cretin would launch the equivalent of 80 Hiroshimas on the world just because a bloke told him to. This guy is a psychopathic, sociopathic, ignorant, brainwashed, mentally retarded asshole who has a “god” at this point in time called David Cameron. Well the latter IS descended from Moses so I hear!
In this documentary, you will meet Commander Jonty Powis (yes that is his fricking name – it would have to be right? A ridiculous name for a brainwashed asshole, so it fits) who believes in armageddon “if required” with absolutely no questions asked. So, if a Tony Blair or David Cameron (on the orders of the Crown of course but, while HMS Victorious is a part of the British fleet and, as such, in Her Majesty’s Service – after all that’s where the H.M FCUKING S comes from – this shall never be admitted by any of these ponces) orders a launch of a nuke (or 16 nukes in all, each with 5 times the power of a hiroshima!), this TWAT won’t even wince. Screw his family, screw you, screw everyone on the planet. He KNOWS that on the launch of a nuke, it would very probably end in him never seeing his family again yet watch him. Listen to him. Feel that robotic nothingness and also recognise, so transparently, his narcissism and his self importance and feeling of power. He loves it and it shows.
But the other thing to notice is this: While he sits and talks, emotionless, about such an eventuality, his Chief Petty Officer and most of the lads in the crew, are doing it for a job (which is just as scary really but they don’t have that inhuman quality this dirty POS Commander has). His crew, at least most of them, seem to have that element where it may still be possible to educate them. The Commander and the idiot who is desperate to be a Captain of his own sub, Lieutenant Nick Samuels, are “married” to the – not so much the job but the ideology of it, the power and the “hero” complex. Blow up the planet and you’re a “hero” these days.
“I REVEL IN THE RESPONSIBILITY… AND I’M NOT SHY OF SAYING SO” (His appetite for power bleeds out of him and he’s showing that psychopathic “I’ll do whatever it takes” attitude that our establishment love. He’s Tony Blair in the Navy!
Here’s an interesting quote from Jonty Poncy however: “But I would never hide behind the excuse of ‘I was only obeying orders’. I am part of something greater than myself”. Now, wouldn’t you love to know exactly what he meant by that? “A part of something….”. What exactly is that “something” and what comprises it? Because I sure as hell don’t. He’d launch a nuke over my dead body if I had the potential of stopping the snotty nosed little bastard. “Greater than myself”? How “great” do you think you are buddy? To me, you’re nothing but a brainwashed, ignorant wanker! What constitutes this “greatness” he speaks of? You and I certainly don’t bloody know so who is he sleeping with? An Admiral? An MP? A Cabinet Minister? A Lord? But, if you’d never hide behind “only obeying orders” then I dream of the day I see you in the Hague with your “god”.
I could see that guy at a certain Guest House nearby an Elm tree! He appears the type.
“I have to do it. There’s no point in having nuclear weapons if I’m not prepared to do it”. No thinking, no nothing. Just do as your told. He’d have no clue, personally, regarding the circumstances and he wouldn’t care. He wouldn’t give it a moment’s thought. He simply believes in people like David cameron and his Queen. He’s a FCUKING ARSEHOLE! He’s an adult who still loves his model railways so what else do you expect? I can see him and David Icke getting along just fine!
“I think if you weren’t capable of doing that (switching off) the detention would drive you round the bend!”. It already has mate! You’re mentally challenged!
Then you have Nick, again. “Patriotism, duty and honour… I think a lot of these values are rubbished by a lot of people”. Too damned right they are you stupid prick! They’re bred into you. Explain where or what the “honour” is in your job? Duty I know about but duty to who? Why do you feel the need to dutifully do as you’re told like a little boy being told by his mother to wash the dishes? Don’t feel a duty to me or millions of others mate because we want nothing from you. Patriotism? You still cry when the flag is raised? What does it signify to you? Do you still dream about Britain winning the wars and “We’ll fight them on the beaches”? Don’t you look around you and wonder what the fcuk these people fought for? Don’t you see your prison being built? You’re a 1st class idiot. Your Commander spoke nothing of these things (though he might) because his skin’s cold as ice and his blood’s black and he just sees the next step to “greatness” while you dream of being a sub’s Captain. You didn’t have the “killer instinct” – that was obvious – and that’s probably why they sacked you. You still feel the patriotism, the honour and the duty now you see what it’s like in civvy street trying to carve out every penny you have for that family you have while the Crown you once served fcuks your family every single day, steals your wealth and your capability of giving that child of yours a good upbringing in a land (and world) that’s going to have her in an open prison?
You’re a fricking IDIOT man!
“If they didn’t pay me in the Royal Navy then I’d still do the job”. Yeah? Really? God you people talk SHIT! Stupid, naive crap! So if that’s true then, when they sacked you, didn’t you say “Hey! I’ll work for nothing”? Or were you that shit at what you did (and I’m sure you weren’t) that they didn’t even want you for free? So, another thing the Royal Navy and David Icke have in common then! lol (sorry, couldn’t resist that one).
Rear Admiral Roger Lane-Knott: “How do we adapt its (Trident’s) use in a future world”? Having been asked about Trident’s applicability to a world now with no “Cold War” while the interviewer stated it was a huge insurance policy. My question to the Rear Admiral’s statement (do such Admirals take it up the rear I wonder?) is this: HOW DO YOU ADAPT A NUCLEAR SUBMARINE’S USE? It HAS only one use you stupid twat!
Rear Admiral Roger Lane-Knott: “The world is an extremely unstable place…anyone who looks in the newspapers or on their television screens..”. Yes indeed Roger my rear, and that’s precisely what your newspapers and tv/media are all about. Keeping the fear of the bogeyman alive otherwise you and all your shit, would be out of a job.
“America sells britain the missiles, britain provides the warheads”. Perhaps because her majesty and the Crown have control of the uranium mines? Just possibly.
Lieutenant Commander Tony Dalton: Question – “would you actually do it if you had to?” Dalton’s answer (without hesitation – because if he did hesitate someone would want to know why of course)… “Yes.” and as you can hear, he just 100% trusts his Prime Minister and the Cabinet office. You’ve got to also remember that these goons are looking forward to exceptionally good pensions.
Question: “There may be no realm left to defend?” Jonty’s answer: “Perhaps. But by being terrible we persuade people not to attack us”. Ask him why they would wish to attack us? Go on, ask him! Damn! You didn’t! It’s got nothing to do with persuading anyone not to attack us. What on earth would Iran or Afghanistan or North Korea or anyone want to attack a tiny little dot on the world map for? Our oil is running out (if we believe what we’re told that is by these same goons). What other natural resources do we have on this bitter little lump of earth that anyone would want? And who’s left to attack us? Terrorists? Have you ever noticed that these “terrorists” attack us because of our own interference in their sovereign nations? We have nothing you brainwashed twat! All we have is control of an international system of money and we use people like you, you asshole, to intimidate not to protect. YOU are the man saying “Do as we demand of you otherwise I might just get an order from 10 Downing street.. capice?” You’re a fcuking mafia!
Question: “The Trident programme cost around £10billion. That money could build an awful lot of schools and hospitals. Does it ever occur to you that we’ve got our priorities wrong?”
Answer: “No, i think you’ve got your priorities wrong. Erm… the force has been created to do a job and that job is to dissuade attacks against the United Kingdom. I’ve satisfied myself that I work for a democracy (the twat doesn’t even know what a democracy actually is. He just thinks he knows.) and I am the expression of that democracy’s political will to be defended.”
FROM WHAT ASSHOLE? AND WHAT ARE YOU DEFENDING? WE’RE SO MULTICULTURAL NOW, IT CAN’T BE OUR WHITE SKINS! OH I FORGOT, IT MUST BE OUR WAY OF LIFE RIGHT? WE HAVE IT ALL SO RIGHT RIGHT? AFTER ALL THERE’S NO-ONE STARVING OVER HERE AND THERE’S NO CORRUPTION AND EVERYONE IS JUST WHOOPING IT UP EVERYNIGHT SINGING RULE BRITANNIA!
YOU FCUKING CRETIN!
But Commander Jonty’s “Jolly pleased”
Just one last question Jonty: Without stating that old canard “our freedom” (it’s old, tasteless and bullshit and if you don’t know it then you are the twat), tell us exactly what is being defended? And make it good mate!
You really don’t have a fcuking clue do you? But that pension and “Well, I was a Rear Admiral by the time I left and had a jolly good time” works well for you and that ego right?
Coronation Street: A vehicle to promote eugenics and societal change
What TV PROGRAMMING do you watch?
Isn’t it interesting that one of the longest running series on TV anywhere in the world, is a PROGRAMME entitled “Coronation Street”? Think of all the PROGRAMMES which have been broadcast on the BBC/ITV and other stations over the years. Many excellent dramas etc but only ONE remains and just keeps going. Yes it’s because it gets the audience. Of course. But there are others which got audiences just as big for the time they were broadcast. The establishment maintain Coronation Street because it does its job excellently. The writers for it keep churning out the stories and plot lines that keep so many watching and those watching will support the series as being “current” and full of plot lines which make you think. Yes indeed. That is precisely what they intend it to be. Through those story lines, they embed within your mind what subjects should be considered by you. They even make certain subjects taboo or not taboo just by the way they are presented. The sheer fact some ARE presented suggests to the mind of the observer that “this is acceptable”. Gay is acceptable, transsexualism is acceptable, SUICIDE is acceptable, wanting to die so as not to be a burden on your loved ones or society is acceptable and noble! Just keep feeding it all in and, eventually, that acceptance will be achieved.
But very few give any consideration to the agenda which is being promulgated in all of this. They just view it as “entertainment” while being a statement, at times, on present society. They cannot even fathom that it exists as a solid society changer within a far bigger picture. That’s just “crazy talk” and taking things too far.
No dearies, it’s not.
In the early 1900s Fabian Society members advocated the ideal of a scientifically planned society and supported eugenics by way of sterilization[citation needed]. This is said to have influenced the passage of the Half-Caste Act, and its subsequent implementation in Australia, where children were systematically and forcibly removed from their parents, so that the British colonial regime could “protect” the Aborigine children from their parents. In an article published in The Guardian on 14 February 2008 (following the apology offered by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to the “stolen generations“), Geoffrey Robertson criticised Fabian socialists for providing the intellectual justification for the eugenics policy that led to the stolen generations scandal.[31][32] Such views on socialism, inequality and eugenics in early 20th century Fabians were not limited to one individual, but were widely shared in the Fabian Society and throughout a broad political spectrum.
While living and working in Singapore for over 5 years, the following has been of no surprise to me whatsoever considering that Singapore is, effectively (and very definitely) a “Labour camp” which does not even recognise itself as such. If you are an outsider looking in however (and I don’t mean a hop-over for a few days on the way to Australia when all you appreciate is what is on show on the surface while you do not have a clue about the undercurrent of sheer misery) it is as close to communism for the masses who then work for Singapore PLC while the elite sit in their ivory castles and decide at what age and under what circumstances people are allowed a home for themselves to live in – it is what is coming in the west, slowly and gradually……
Lee Kuan Yew, the first Prime Minister of Singapore, stated in his memoirs that his initial political philosophy was strongly influenced by the Fabian Society. However, he later altered his views, considering the Fabian ideal of socialism as impractical.[20] In 1993, Lee said:
“They [Fabian Socialists] were going to create a just society for the British workers – the beginning of a welfare state, cheap council housing, free medicine and dental treatment, free spectacles, generous unemployment benefits. Of course, for students from the colonies, like Singapore and Malaya, it was a great attraction as the alternative to communism. We did not see until the 1970s that that was the beginning of big problems contributing to the inevitable decline of the British economy.”
—Lee Kuan Yew interview with Lianhe Zaobao[20]
Singapore not a country one would want to live
Ladies and Gentlemen,Singapore is just one big fraud. And underneath all that glitter, it is really not a place someone who had a choice would want to live.
On the outside Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew paints a picture of a modern first class city. You have TV newsreaders who try to speak good English imitating someone from any other city like London, but with one difference. Those in London are free of government censorship while the Singaporean specimen reads out prepared texts vetted by government agencies. You have newspapers published in glossy paper just like in London, except in Singapore they are state owned and controlled, where journalists report to government ministers on what they have plan to write. You see lawyers all dressed in black dragging modern briefcases with books overflowing with wisdom, but in actual fact they are more afraid of the government than their clients ever were.
If you fall into hard times you starve unless you go to some government minister’s office and beg on all fours for a handout. In the west there are established procedures for welfare for the unfortunate in society to live with their heads up.
Singapore has no place for people who want to better society towards a more humane and compassionate one. The political philosophy is that of Lee Kuan Yew which is not very different perhaps from how the Chinese peasants lived under the Ming or Tang Dynasty many centuries ago. Which goes something like this. You wake up in the morning, go to work, be respectful towards your rulers and superiors, don’t think you know any better than your masters and work your way up the ladder through the recognition of your superiors. Of course above all your superiors there is the great master or leader who is better and wiser than all. In the case of the Chinese Dynasty, it was the Ming or Tang emperor. In the case of Singapore, it is Lee Kuan Yew and in his absence, his son.
I am sorry but this is not the way I like to live. And neither do I think anyone who has an understanding of the way things are going on in the island and has the means to live somewhere else.
So what is left of native Singaporeans are those who simply cannot leave because of lack of skills or an understanding of their plight or those who are not concerned about living as free men an women as long as they earn sufficiently large amounts of money. In this group are the Lee Kuan Yew minions who stay behind.
You have of course the foreign Western businessmen and professionals who do business in the island. For them it is only a case of making money. They are naturally not concerned about how they live their lives since it is not their country and they are there for short periods, when they will go hone to France, Germany or the USA. Most of them leave their families at home in the West and even if they bring them here, they study at foreign schools with their German, Italian or American teachers. As far as they are concerned, they despise Singaporeans for a cowardly people, willing to live as slaves in Lee Kuan Yew’s island, which they would not in America, Germany or France.
Then there are the middle level professionals, some from England, Australia, India and other places. For a variety of reasons, they spend some time in Singapore working as engineers, bank officers, and executives. They too are totally unconcerned about how Singaporeans have to live their lives since they are here temporarily. In 6 months, if they got a better job in Rangoon Burma, they would spend some time there if possible.
In the end, all you have in Singapore at the upper levels is the revolving door phenomenon. People come in for a time, and then leave, only to be replaced by other people who come in and who themselves leave too.
If there are going to be anyone left behind to run the place, it is the handful of sycophants and crawlers who willingly take orders from above as to what to do, regardless of right or wrong. And their numbers are shrinking too, as Singapore students leave for a foreign education and opt to remain where they are. Singapore is reaching a point where it cannot find sufficiently capable people to run the show and this is entirely because of what Singapore is today, a life of submission and obedience, which people with an education find unacceptable.
Unless the native Singaporeans who have a stake in the country take drastic real earth shattering action to demand a democratic system of government, literally taking Lee Kuan Yew to task, I don’t see him doing anything to arrest the decline into which Singapore is sliding.
Gopalan Nair
Attorney at Law
Disbarred from practicing law in Lee’s Singapore, imprisoned and refused entry to the island for criticizing Singapore’s judiciary in this blog (see blogpost May 29, 2008 Singapore. Judge Belinda Ang’s Kangaroo Court)
Actively practicing law in California and in good standing at the California Bar.
Member in good standing as a lawyer in England and Wales (Barrister).
39737 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite A1
Fremont, CA 94538, USA
Tel: 510 657 6107
Fax: 510 657 6914
Email: nair.gopalan@yahoo.com
Blog: http://singaporedissident.blogspot.com/
This leaves us with a further problematic interpretation of the stakeholder concept – that related to the welfare state. No sooner had Mr Blair sat down in the Far East than maverick Labour MP Frank Field was claiming the speech heralded a root and branch reform of pensions and benefits. It is certainly true that the present welfare system does not protect workers from summary restriction of pension and unemployment insurance “rights” which they believed the state had bestowed. While it is unthinkable in a free society for the state to rescind individual property rights – indeed they are so deeply-rooted that they have often re-emerged in eastern Europe after 50 years of communism – the same is not true of the communal pension and benefit rights bestowed under a democratic welfare state.
One way of remedying this problem is to require individuals to build up their own “provident accounts” on the Singapore model of forced savings. These can be used for unemployment insurance, education, pensions and even housing. Since they are individually assigned accounts, and fully funded by supporting investments, they cannot be lightly cancelled by the state, and would certainly be compatible with a stakeholder economy. But would a generation which is already heavily taxed to pay for the unfunded pensions of its parents now vote for a second dose of forced savings to pay for their own pensions as well? It seems rather doubtful, to put it mildly. This may be another area where New Labour needs to proceed cautiously as it puts meat on the bones of the stakeholder idea.
Then we have the following from the book: ” Autobiography and Decolonization- Modernity, Masculinity, and the Nation-state” By Philip Holden
Do you see it? I have been saying to people for some years now that the way the UK is going is precisely what I saw when I lived in Singapore. Gopalan Nair is precisely correct when he speaks about the expats having disdain for the slaves who make up the populace in Singapore. I did at the time but I was unaware and ignorant of what I know now about the world because I was just too busy making a living until what happened to Gopalan happened to me and the corruption, which lay underneath the squeaky clean pavements you thought you could eat your dinner off, hit you right between the eyes.
But then you also have this, from the CFR and Henry Kissinger re Lee Kuan Yew:
So why diverge into all of this stuff about Singapore and Lee Kuan Yew and fabianism when the post is meant to be about Coronation Street for god’s sakes?
Well, it’s simple really. To achieve what Lee Kuan Yew achieved takes decades and it will take decades here too. What needs to be done is create, over time, and entirely multi-cultural society (that said, Singapore isn’t quite as multi-cultural as it likes to portray itself. It’s still 80% chinese and the rest (Indian and Malay in the main) are second and third class citizens. The expats are a little “oasis” of their own and Singapore does its best to make them feel “at home” and comfortable BUT, you hit any issue (as I did) and the vultures come out to tear you apart because you’re “making money” and they see a way of getting it back while why would a Singaporean lawyer and judiciary give a damn about what they did to you and your family? It’s just business and you’re primed to be stripped of whatever they can get their hands on – with no jurisdiction, it doesn’t matter, they’ll fuck you over and over.
Anyhow, there’s the multiculturalism to cause even more division in the populace – therefore there is no one voice shouting at our corrupt government – plus there is the total change of the benefits and pensions structure. You see most people are squealing at the conservatives for the austerity measures and the benefits issue but, in fact, it all started a very long time ago and, to give the creep his due (David Icke that is) it has been a totalitarian tiptoe to where we are now. Again, it doesn’t matter who’s in power – Labour, Tory or Libdem – because they don’t create the policy, they just implement it. It’s the Crown which dictates from the shadows and the Crown like Lee Kuan Yew because they see he’s created that slave driven powerhouse on an island no larger than Greater London.
Now, you have a massive proportion of the UK who regularly and faithfully tune into Coronation Street (Coronation? Crown? Indeed!) and that one long time serial drama has fed (but, in many respects, created) the morality of this nation while they now have another vehicle, long standing, which doubles that effort called “Eastenders”. Both drip feeding into the collective consciousness almost night after night. Most thinking they are just reflecting society as they go along. Wrong! They are, in many respects, creating society by colouring stories the way the establishment want them coloured. Have you also noticed another thing about these series? They tend to be pro monarchy all in all. Coincidence? Not at all. And just like the Queen’s celebrations and the Queen’s speech, Lee Kuan Yew has his “Singapore Days” where he has his media create a celebratory atmosphere of pride in the country tied into “democracy” (a joke) and all thing wonderful and historic. Precisely what we do here. And it works and always will.
So back to the eugenics message Coronation Street has just fed you.
Here is George Bernard Shaw, a fabian just like Kuan Yew and Blair (and quietly our entire establishments):
Got that? Now please don’t think or consider this is just one very “mad” man from many decades ago. If you do so then you’re just allowing yourself to be wilfully ignorant of everything going on around you. Shaw’s words reflect Singaporean (and soon British) society to a T. Singapore is an economic slave camp where anything but democracy exists and yet the British government treat Singapore as an exemplary example of democracy and success at work yet families have to stay together in small HDB flats because there is no welfare state (all tax receipts are for the top echelons) and they must support each other through their entire “lifecycle” and I use the term “lifecycle” because singaporeans are nothing more than products/resources to keep the machine running. There is no quality of life in Singapore (but they have been taught/conditioned to believe there is and be intensely proud of their achievements – which are all economic but not for them personally rather than simply for the singaporean elite to tell them “how lucky they are” and they believe it. Some don’t however but their lives can become very difficult (just as Gopalan’s did). The same thing is happening with those of us who speak out too loudly in the UK now too.
“Done very gently”…. i.e. humanely not cruel while Hesmondhalgh herself is a member of the Humanist society. A society which pitches itself as being pro human but is as much pro human as the World Wildlife Fund is pro wildlife.
Then we have to remember Newsweek and Time magazines in the last couple of years presenting us with these articles:
So a little more on eugenics:
“Oh that’s about a century ago!” I hear you say. God! You just don’t get it do you?
What about this then….
Which all leaves the question……
Answer: Well, for one thing, ask Lloyd……
Queen Elizabeth crowd sources on Indiegogo
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth has found herself down to her last £million while a palace insider stated she had approached David Icke for advice regarding donation funding. Mr Icke, a world renowned conspiracy theorist, is reported as having pointed her majesty toward the Indiegogo website.
Next she’ll be down the local pawnbrokers with her diamonds and tiaras and selling her shares which are protected from the population’s general knowledge.
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II, long thought to be one of the world’s richest women, is apparently down to her last million in savings, with palaces leaking and falling to pieces as MPs say she has been failed by her advisers and the Treasury.
The Queen’s courtiers have been advised to take money saving tips from the UK treasury, as her finances dip to an historic low with just £1 million left in reserve, the Telegraph reported.
A report by the Commons Public Accounts Committee found that her reserve fund had fallen from £35 million in 2001 to £1 million today. While the Royal household had made efficiency savings of just 5 percent over the past five years, government departments have made savings of up to a third.
MPs on the committee said that the Treasury must help to protect royal palaces from further damage and deterioration.
“We believe that the Treasury has a duty to be actively involved in reviewing the household’s financial planning and management – and it has failed to do so,” said Margaret Hodge, the Labour chairperson of the committee.
Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle are both in a terrible state of repair with staff required to catch rain in buckets to protect art and antiquities.
Meanwhile, in Buckingham Palace the 60-year-old boilers were running up bills of £774,000 a year and the wiring has not been replaced since 1949. More than a third of the royal estate has been found to be below “target condition.”
The committee compared Buckingham Palace, which has just 500,000 visitors a year, to the Tower of London, which has more than £2 million.
“If you look at the Tower of London and its visitor numbers it makes you think that there’s potential here. Have they done their darnedest to maximize value for money?” Hodge said.
The report also found that the royal household has not even attempted to cost up its huge backlog of repairs because it believed there was no point in doing so until it has new funding in place.
The Crown Estate gets 15 percent of its income from the Sovereign Grant, which replaced the old way of funding the Royal Family through the civil list in 2012.
While the Royal Household’s net expenditure was £33.3 million last year, £31 million of this came from the Sovereign Grant. To find the difference, it had to dip into its reserve fund.
A spokesman for Buckingham Palace insisted that the Sovereign Grant had made the Queen’s funding “more transparent and scrutinized” and was resulting in a “more efficient use of public funds.”
But the committee found that much more needs to be done if the Crown Estate and the Royal Household are to properly manage the Queen’s finances.
“We got the impression that they just haven’t tried to make greater savings. Here we are, we’re all in it together, but they are failing to eke out better value for the Queen. They are dipping into their reserves in a way that just isn’t sensible,” Hodge said.
Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II unveils a plaque during an official visit to The Shard building in central London, on November 21, 2013. The Queen and her husband Prince Philip toured the viewing deck of the country’s highest building Thursday. AFP PHOTO / STEFAN ROUSSEAU/POOL
The report found that the Treasury was not doing its job properly. It is responsible for overseeing the Royal Household finances but is not doing enough and should draw on its extensive experience and “offer advice on key packages.”
“The Household needs to get better at planning and managing its budgets for the longer term – and the Treasury should be more actively involved in reviewing what the household is doing,” Hodge said.
Number crunching
A closer look at both the report and the figures in it reveals that the Queens finances may be healthier than the Committee found, and in areas where she has lost money it is not the fault of the Treasury but of her managers, the Guardian reports.
The report its self was compiled from a series of questions and answers with just two witness giving the answers, Sir Alan Reid, Keeper of the Privy Purse and Mike Stevens, Deputy Treasurer to the Queen.
When asked why they did not cut back their expenditure, Sir Alan Reid replies: “We really believed that it is not wise to cut back on the level of activity of the monarchy.”
The figure of 1 million pounds does not accurately reflect the value of assets held by the Royal Household, the Guardian says. Their total reserves stand at 14.2 million pounds, 11.8 million pounds of which comes from property, plant and other equipment.The biggest chunk of royal spending goes on payroll, and although staff numbers remained unchanged over the past year cost have risen considerably.
Austin Mitchell, one of the members of the committee, asked: “It looks to me that you managed to survive and manage the finances by letting the buildings deteriorate, by freezing the staff costs and by digging into the reserves. Is that a fair summary of what has happened?”
To which Sir Alan replied, “I think that does summarize, to a degree, what happened last year.”
Indiegogo
However, the last minute intervention of Mr Icke may have just saved the Queen’s bacon. There are rumours within the establishment that, due to Mr Icke’s advice and enlightenment of the Queen on how to make vast sums of money out of people without going to the bank for a loan, the Queen had a quiet word with her cabinet and the secretary of state for media, to give Mr Icke a pass regarding the requirement, by OFCOM, that no politically motivated person can hold a British broadcasting licence. Mr Icke seems to have quietly apologised to the Queen for calling her a reptile all these years and she quietly pronounced him a Knight of St John of Jerusalem even though he has no royal lineage. He did much the same, quietly while telling poll tax protestors he wouldn’t pay his either but then quietly did so. The Queen likes the name David since it originates from King David as she believes she does. She’s very happy with David Cameron and David Dimbleby we hear also. David Beckham also got a kind word from the Queen although she quietly mentioned to him that she thought Posh was a bit of a slag.
Below, you can see the Queen in her Indiegogo campaign requesting donations to upgrade her property’s boilers. Seemingly, her majesty is not aware that the government runs a free boiler programme for the elderly and those on certain benefits. Perhaps if she were to let her £1million run down to less than £6,000 in the bank then she would qualify and wouldn’t have to come scrounging off the subjects she and her family have lived off their entire lives.
MUSIC: Well it had to be The Flying Lizards right?
Richie Allen: You just couldn’t make this shit up!
Richie Allen of TPV (You couldn’t make this up if you wanted to):
“The idea that former (and current) BBC, ITV and MTV staff would be party to any impropriety is frankly ludicrous.”
You have GOT to be joking Richie?
One photo:
I worked for the BBC. I’d NEVER do that. Ask Richie Allen! He’ll vouch for that!
While your “houseguest” preaches to the world about how the mainstream media is “programming” them, how they’re owned and controlled by the establishment (as now you are through OFCOM) etc etc.
And yet YOU Richie, come out with a statement like that? I am seriously pissing myself, I don’t know about anyone else mate. That was either seriously dumb, seriously naive or, most likely, both! Sorry mate but you said it! lol
Statement from Richie Allen …
“I’ve been producing and presenting radio/television programmes for over 15 years. I’ve been in London for nearly four months now. I arrived in late September and rented an apartment in North Wembley. David Icke arrived the day after me and moved into our spare room. Caroline (my partner) arrived a week later. The rent is £1200 per calendar month. David pays £250 per month for his room. It’s a bit of a madhouse, with Jazz (our dog) running around looking for attention. But we have a lot of fun. Caroline is crazy about David and mothers him, even though he is at least one hundred years older than us!
I am paid to present and produce a show for TPV. I pay my rent from that. Full stop. The station pays its senior presenters and producers and depends on the support of dozens of volunteers, many of whom have jobs and come in in their spare time. Many do not have a job and come in anyway. It’s remarkable. I’ve never seen such commitment to an idea. Whatever comes of it, I will always remember those who come in, research, edit or perform various administrative tasks and ask for nothing in return. To a man and woman, the folks I am working with, who right now are running around and multitasking and working like crazy to get us on air, are absolutely disgusted that someone who left the project, rather than face the music and explain her intolerable abusive behaviour, has cried foul and made baseless allegations about the appropriation of funds at TPV.
The idea that former (and current) BBC, ITV and MTV staff would be party to any impropriety is frankly ludicrous. I am staggered at what we achieved in seven months with ONLY £300,000. To turn a massive empty floor into a state of the art broadcasting facility, pay senior staff and pay the exorbitant taxes and business rates and STILL be on the air is miraculous. The guys who dreamed it all up (David Icke and Sean Adl-Tabatabai haven’t taken a penny. In fact David is forever putting his hand in his pocket and spending money to plug gaps, as is Sean. In fact Sean has had to take a mainstream production job in the spring to make ends meet. They have taken NOTHING The oversight is first class.
What annoys me most about the half baked autodidact who made these allegations is the abject cowardice she has shown in making them. You abuse your producers until they leave (4 of them), no volunteer wants to work with you. You regularly threaten to leave if you don’t get your way and when you are asked to explain yourself, you run away and cry foul. What happened to taking responsibility for your actions and saying; “it’s a fair cop guv” and taking your medicine.
I said it before and I’ll say it again, I am 39 years old (shit) and I will never be involved with anything more important than this as long as I live. May the good Lord bless the good ship TPV and all who sail in her!”
I have to go now. The insanity of this circus has me in between stitches laughing and, as Icke just stated on his explanatory video with a handheld camera, close in shaky shots and his mouth dry with a mixture of nerves, anxiety and deep deep anger, “I despair at the sheer stupidity of the human race”.
David Icke: Living it up in California!
Ok people, here is a VERY simple question for you:
Let’s say you had £100K in the bank. Let’s say it was in the HSBC for example.
Now let’s say you wanted to set up business in the US but you only had that £100K and you wished to look after it – it’s YOUR hard earned money after all right? With me so far?
But “DING!”, an idea comes to mind and you decide to launch a donation drive on Indiegogo and it raises £300K. You quickly deposit that money into Barclay’s Bank. The even better thing is, obviously, it’s not YOUR money in the sense it has taken absolutely NO effort on your part to make that money. You just ASKED for it and “abracadabra” you got it! The universe brings to you that which you wish for – David Icke was right! Just have positive energy! Try it! 😉
So, now you have £400K and you think “Great, we can go to the US and have a whale of a time while trying to set things up!”. So you book the best hotels, have sumptuous meals and check out the bars. You spend, perhaps around £20K, perhaps more (but it doesn’t matter even if you spent £1, the issue is still the same).
Someone says “Hey, you’ve certainly lived it up while I cannot say whether it was the donation money you spent or not”.
You turn round and say “No, we didn’t spend the donation money! I can show you the credit card withdrawals coming from the HSBC bank account”.
Here’s the simple question: Does it make ANY difference which bank account the cash was withdrawn from when the fact is this: You wouldn’t have spent that much money from your own £100K IF it wasn’t for the fact you had reached the £300K goal of the donation drive would you?
That means that you HAVE in essence spent on the basis of receiving those donations.
Another way of looking at it (for those with logic impairments): If you had an income of £1000 a week and outgoings of £1000 a week, you’re pretty unlikely to spend, a non budgeted for, £5K on a holiday to Barbados are you?
Now, let’s say your father dies and leaves you £100K in his will that’s now in a savings account of yours. Would you consider the Barbados holiday then?
“Sean, if we keep this up with a donation drive every 6 months, we can do this as often as we wish!”
Devin JM Warnshuis
posted toSonia Poulton 56 minutes ago via Mobile
Hello Sonia. First I would like to thank you for the work that you have done. I was shocked to hear that you were leaving TPV yesterday when I saw the announcement posted both on your Facebook page and TPV page. However, I kind of sensed something was about to surface. Here is my story.
I met Sean and Deanna in Los Angeles in August of 2013. I have been a fan of David Icke’s research and was following TPV from its initial announcement. I donated money to the cause twice because I believed in it full-heartedly. Sean and Deanna were very personable, and I was excited to meet them and hopefully become involved with TPV. My partner befriended both of them on Facebook and later he noticed that they were staying in very high end hotels and expensive areas of Los Angeles and San Francisco. They were posting pictures of their escapades at bars and restaurants, etc. I remember wondering if this was being funded by the money I had donated to TPV along with many others. I also was surprised that they would choose such expensive places to stay. However, I do not know how all of this was paid for and it is certainly possible that the money donated to TPV was not used to fund this.
Fast forward to last week when I became aware of the telethon that was scheduled to raise more money for TPV since it was in danger of going off the air. I specifically read the article on the ActivistPost website where David was interviewed. The article was explaining TPV appeal for more funding and I remember thinking “what are they doing with they money?” I thought if they were spending the money on high end hotels and bars then it certainly does not budget matters. It also does not look good.
For the record, I have no proof that TPV funds were used inappropriately. However, it is very uncanny that my thoughts on this entire situation are shortly followed by the events of yesterday and today. Coincidence? Perhaps…
Sonia, if what you are saying is true I commend you for having the courage to go where others will not. I absolutely agree with you that the finances of TPV should be public. After all, it IS the PEOPLE’S voice…is it not?
Warning: David Icke & Alex Jones – use them intelligently
Because you are getting 90% facts mixed with pure fiction. That is a “deadly dose”.
You are NOT going to beat this thing by being so vacant-minded that you allow arseholes like these two to fill your brain with nonsense, misinfo and diversion.
By all means, however, if you are so sold on these people then you’re already lost and there’s nothing anyone can say to redeem your brain.
David (L.Ron) Icke: Welcome to the first church of appliantology!
SIGN UP NOW TO £1 A MONTH DONATIONS TO TSV (“THE SHEEPLES VOICE”) AND WIN A BRAND NEW DIGITAL TOASTER FROM RUSSELL HOBBS! IT CAN BE PROGRAMMED TO ACCURATELY DETERMINE THE FUTURE COLOUR OF YOUR BREAD AND WHEN YOU’RE GONNA DIE!
RRP: £39.99. TSV PRICE (ON SIGN UP TO 2 YEAR CONTRACT): FREE
WELCOME TO THE FIRST CHURCH OF APPLIANTOLOGY: THE ONLY CHURCH THAT OFFERS INSTANT TECHNOLOGICAL SEXUAL GRATIFICATION WHILE TUNING IN TO SONIA POULTON! OR, FOR THE LADIES: RICHIE ALLEN!
HERE IS A WELCOME NOTE BY OUR PATRON AND CHIEF SHAREHOLDER, L. RON ICKE:
Welcome, Are you sick of being lied to? Do you realise there is a new church on the block which provides you with 24 hour third eye stimulation and additional stimulation if you sign up to a two year contract with us for ongoing support donations? I am the head curator, creator, instigator and verbal masturbator of the first church of appliantology known as TSV. Everyone has a voice at TSV and everyone has a choice. We believe in freewill and I can assure you, you will be welcomed with open arms when you decide to join us. The world is an ugly place at the moment (always has been but let’s not go there) and by joining our church, we will give you the tools you need to recognise whether an entity is trying to possess you and whether that entity is benign or malign in its intent. Reptilians are everywhere, as you well know and it is important, that, for the overall well-being of the human race and our future on our beautiful planet, that we eradicate the influence of these nasty entities. What we at the church can do for humanity to achieve this goal is to ensure that the world’s population attains OT status (Operating Thetan) by getting totally zoned out on your preference of drug and also be furnished with the digital toaster we are giving to each and every donator free of charge which, not only does as is stated above, but also provides the second important element of becoming OT – that is alpha wave, vibrational frequencies which physically stimulate your glans or clit at optimal levels to produce constant orgasmic ecstasy. Dr Manjir Samanta-Laughton has studied the field of bio-energy and has a Diploma in it from Plexus Institute (more details below). Dr Manjir developed the toaster with Russell Hobbs specifically for sheeple like YOU! Come join us! David (L.Ron) IckePlease play the video/song as you read on. You’ll get the picture!
I had a quick look at Scientology today because I came across (not literally) a woman by the name of “Dr” Manjir Samanta-Laughton who presents “Hidden Science” on The Sheeple’s Voice. I noticed she held a “MBBS dip Bio-Energy” and thought to myself “What the hell is that?”. I googled the term and the only thing that came up on the first page were links relating to “Dr” Manjir.
There was a link to a profile of the “Dr” and, from it, it would SEEM she has an MBBS as a Medical Doctor while it also stated that, at the age of 18, she had a kundalini experience which totally changed her from a skeptic to a “believer” – in what, I’m unsure really. Anyhow, it would seem that, even after that experience, she continued study of medicine (you know? The medicine that is presented to us as life saving and healthy by the governments and their private medical corporations) and then she veered off into “Bio Energy”. Sounds exciting and very scientific doesn’t it? Must be hell of an intellect to get a Diploma (remember NOT an MBBS which, the way she writes her credentials – no commas – would suggest the MBBS was in Bio-Energy) in a subject like that eh?
Well no, not exactly. You see the “Plexus Institute” is pretty much a place where you pay your dues (money), you come out with a diploma. Let me explain that. Have you ever studied a degree? In any subject at any university or college of further education? If not, no matter. You wouldn’t really expect that University to demand a CONTRACT be signed now would you? Yes you register for University and all that but a CONTRACT? What on earth would a contract be for? Well, let’s see:
I have searched to find ANYTHING related to credentials (REAL credentials) for Michael O’Doherty who founded the PLEXUS Institute. Anything whatsoever that would even indicate that this guy has some background of study which would allow him to formulate ANY solid grounds for his “Healing practice” (and no I don’t give a damn that Michael Flatley says the healing got rid of a 3 year virus he had – one of my children had serious asthma for about 3 years when very young and then we leave the UK to live in the Philippines and it disappears overnight and never comes back even after leaving South East Asia. I’m convinced that the change of climate must have helped but I have no proof of it and Doctors would not suggest that that is all it took). There is no suggestion whatsoever that Michael O’Doherty has any medical or otherwise – scientific, nothing – background. And here we have some jumped up “MD” (she’ll never get a job in medicine again that’s for sure) saying she has a “MBBS dip Bio-Energy” qualification??? BULLSHIT! You pay money to this O’Doherty “Institute” and you spend 8 weekends (16 days!) and you heal people with “vibrational energy”. COME ON FOLKS! It’s time to wake the hell up! VOODOO has been ongoing for centuries and so has snake oil salesmen!
Here’s part of the “contract”:
Michael wants full control of the media and public relations. When you use digital video techniques to give yourself a bit of “Hollywood” healing, you’ve also got to have complete control on what is stated to the media and public.
Now L.Ron has a “healer” sponsor by the name of NPL (quite close to NLP then isn’t it? :-)) who provided £1000 in the initial donation drive. Here’s the thing: Icke talks about only accepting sponsors who are positive or, at least neutral, in their effect upon society. Ok, let’s consider that shall we? The shite that Plexus or NPL promote, on the face of it, can, at worst, be “neutral” UNTIL you consider one aspect. Once more, it’s money. These “16 day therapists” charge a fee for doing what they do. I’m saying it’s total crap and bullshit and so, that being the case, it isn’t exactly “neutral”. It is embezzling money from people. If you want to believe that a bunch of Irish leprechauns or any other twat with a “dip” after their name (a 16 day “dip” no less) can heal you, then be my guest. My opinion is you must be a fricking “dip”stick!
Healing in action (plus digital effects overlay to give you that warm fuzzy feeling):
So, what we have in “Dr” Manjir (if you’re not practicing in your field “Dr” then you are no longer a “Dr” whatever qualification you may have) – I’m no physicist or Plumber or Electrician yet I’m qualified in them all – is at the very most, a GP who’s now lecturing you on Black holes and cosmology and every other science under the sun yet with credentials in NONE of it! How DUMB are you people? Anyone on a TV show and you STILL fall into the fucking trap of “celebrity”. AWAKENED MY ARSEUM!
So now, let’s turn to “L.Ron” Icke once more.
What does Icke preach?
1. Reincarnation (he was Socrates in a previous life dontcha know?)
2. A supreme being. The “Godhead”.
3. Alice Bailey’s 7 rays. But according to L.Ron Icke, used for benign purposes (thick as shit).
4. Man is a spirit. Man is not his body.
So what, then if we consider scientology? Well, here’s THEIR version:
1. It is a fact that unless one begins to handle aberration built up in past lives, he doesn’t progress. In Scientology, one is given the tools to handle upsets and aberrations from past lives that adversely affect the individual in the present, thus freeing one to live a much happier life. Scientologists believe that people are immortal spiritual beings who have lived before and who will live again, and that their future happiness and immortality as spiritual beings depend on how they conduct themselves in the here and now.
2. In Scientology, the concept of God is expressed as the Eighth Dynamic—the urge toward existence as infinity. This is also identified as the Supreme Being. As the Eighth Dynamic, the Scientology concept of God rests at the very apex of universal survival.
3. Fundamental to Scientology is a view of Man as a spiritual being. In Scientology, the spiritual being is called the thetan. The term is taken from the Greek letter theta for “thought” or “life” or “the spirit.” It is used to avoid confusion with previous concepts of the soul. The thetan is immortal and has lived—and will continue to live—through countless lifetimes. One is a thetan who has a mind and who occupies a body. The thetan animates the body and uses the mind.
4. In Scientology, this phenomenon is called exteriorization—the detachment of one’s spirit from the body while yet fully conscious and aware. Scientology believes that Man is not his body, his mind or his brain. He, a spiritual force, energizes the physical body. Indeed, through the discovery of exteriorization, Scientology proved, for the first time, that Man is a spiritual being.
So, L.Ron Icke is obviously a “Thetan”. He meets all the criteria after all.
Read about Lucis Trust’s and Alice Bailey’s 7 ray teachings. They are not the same as scientology’s but there are many parallels because all of this sort of stuff is just re-treatments of the same shit. And it is all DANGEROUS shit! Because it deflects your/our attention from the realities of what we face.
http://www.lucistrust.org/en/arcane_school/talks_and_articles/the_science_of_the_seven_rays
So, onto the psychics. You know? I have an idea for TSV. For every guest they have on their shows (particularly the politicians – if ever they actually achieve getting a current one on), they should have them interviewed by the friendly neighbourhood psychic, or at least have the psychic in the background “reading” them. It would then be possible for the psychic to recognise the aura of a reptilian just as L.Ron’s psychic recognised that his ex wife, Pamela, was a reptilian – Phew! That was a close call Dave eh?
The psychic can then break onto the show and shout “REPTILIAN ALERT”. Now THAT would make for some seriously good viewing L.Ron!
Lastly, here’s a few thoughts on our problem with these reptilians and what, ultimately, I wonder, would L.Ron suggest we do with them once we’ve all awakened and can recognise them. Do we kill them? I mean, will they go away when we put our glasses on and they feel visually “raped”? If we ALL buy a pair of ray bans and put them on at the same time, would the reptilians all vanish back to the Draco constellation or would they put up a fight?
If we recognise one, individually, say down a dark alley one night, what do we do? Is it a stake through the heart? Burn them alive? A bullet? What? And whatever it is we need to do, why didn’t you do it to Pamela?
HEADLINE NEWS: “DAVID ICKE IN CUSTODY SUSPECTED ON BOILING EX WIFE PAMELA IN LARGE IRON CAULDRON. ICKE STATED HE THOUGHT SHE WAS A FROG AND WAS SIMPLY TESTING THE BOILING FROG THEORY.”
David Icke: “Everytime we open our mouths….”
Just taking the man at his word!
“But these are facts” say his faithful. Are they? Prove Savile was a necrophiliac. Prove Diana was ritually abused at Balmoral. Prove George H W Bush is a child abusing paedophile. I’m not saying they are not true but I am also saying that Icke DID NOT claim anything anywhere about Savile until after it came out. What I AM saying is that there is no proof for these allegations yet you take them as facts. That is scary. I cannot imagine what you would be like in a court as a member of a jury having to make a decision of life or death based on “facts”.
Yet Mr Icke gets away with all of this while he states that when one opens one’s mouth to speak of others, one is speaking more about themselves. Then the video simply takes him at his word. Not MY word (I think he talks shit actually) but HIS word.
So here are some FACTS (no inverted commas) which I have already stated about Mr Icke. But because I state THESE facts against HIM, I am somehow speaking more about myself? But he’s not when he states HIS “facts” against others? What a STRANGE duality of thought you Ickeans (and Icke and his cohorts themselves) live in.
1. He has stated that disabled and handicapped people have brought their lot in life upon themselves due to past actions in past lives. Mr Icke, therefore, must have beaten the crap out of someone with arthritis when he was Socrates then.
2. He told all the local IOW poll tax protestors that they should not pay up and he would join them but, quietly, pays up.
3. He states that The People’s Voice is a “Not for profit” enterprise and there will be no shareholder return ( a “Not for profit” is normally a Charity status company or a Private Limited company by guarantee and not share capital). TPV Limited is a Private Limited Company WITH share capital and, therefore, there ARE shareholders. Your donations build the value of that company with every single £1 you donate. Guess who the shareholder is but he doesn’t want any other shareholders?
4. He states that TPV will not be regulated and controlled but then, when he should be doing the “non comply dance” and telling OFCOM to stick it, he does the opposite and complies – just like the poll tax issue then.
5. It is clear from all the previous TPV videos leading up to launch that he had no intention of divulging that the equipment cost him £20K. He consistently stated things like “This doesn’t come cheap you know” (check out the videos for verification of what I am saying.
6. He has £104K CASH at the bank for David Icke Books Ltd but he doesn’t use a cent of that when he could have paid for the entire equipment and have over £80K left cash in DI Books Ltd (and that is not his personal cash savings and investments).
7. He doesn’t tell you that TPV OBVIOUSLY had every intention of getting an OFCOM licence. Obvious because his son gave it away when he stated – even before TPV went live – that the intention was to become the mainstream and broadcast on terrestrial and/or satellite networks such as SKY. If that was the intention (which it was and is) then there was every intention of getting a licence.
8. He dictates that people should not comply while he then complies at every turn. He’s like the general telling his troops to get up out of the trenches and “be men” while he sits back with a cigar.
ALL of the above (and more) are FACTS about David Icke yet, because it’s me stating them against YOUR demigog, I am “persona non grata” and because I open my mouth, I am speaking of myself? When David speaks he isn’t of course speaking about himself. David icke hates exposure (as do the people he exposes, or suggests he exposes) so I am his enemy. What do you do about enemies? You use ad hominem attacks and demonise them among your followers and you suggest that they are speaking about themselves even though they are simply stating the facts.
It’s precisely what the mainstream media and establishment do to their enemies. Would David Icke give me a voice on his network? No chance. He and his goons delete my blogs which other post on his website forum to ensure nobody reads what I have to say about him.
Now consider this: The establishment tend to use D notices and any other tactic to shut their enemies up (a little like what Davey does on his forums) but guess what? That same establishment give him a LICENCE to promulgate his shit.
AND YOU THINK HE AND YOU ARE THREATENING THE ESTABLISHMENT WITH “THE PEOPLE’S VOICE”.
Why do you think he needed to suggest an all out cyber attack on TPV and DI websites?
Our Dave’s studied his subject for a long time. So long he is using precisely the same techniques as his “mortal enemy” from getting money created for him out of nothing to false flag events.
And me and people like me who know better are sitting pissing ourselves laughing at people like you while David keeps taking your money to the bank and increasing the value of that Private Limited Company with share capital!
In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given to the public to understand, because they are understood only by him who guides the public.
It is from us that the all-engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, restorating monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists, and utopian dreamers of every kind. We have harnessed them all to the task: each one of them on his own account is boring away at the last remnants of authority, is striving to overthrow all established form of order. By these acts all States are in torture; they exhort to tranquility, are ready to sacrifice everything for peace: but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super-Government, and with submissiveness.
I beg you to note that among those making attacks upon us will also be organs established by us, but they will attack exclusively points that we have pre-determined to alter.
Not a single announcement will reach the public without our control. Even now this is already attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.
The part played by the liberals, utopian dreamers, will be finally played out when our government is acknowledged. Till such time they will continue to do us good service. Therefore we shall continue to direct their minds to all sorts of vain conceptions of fantastic theories, new and apparently progressive: for have we not with complete success turned the brainless heads of the goyim with progress, till there it not among the goyim one mind able to perceive that under this work lies a departure from truth in all cases where it is not a question of material inventions, for truth is one, and in it there is no place for progress. Progress, like a fallacious idea, serves to obscure truth so that none may know it except us, the Chosen of God, its guardians.
When we come into our kingdom our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it at the end under our beneficent rule.
Who will ever suspect then that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?
THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION
Money physics & the transference of power.
Well, many years ago, I happened to study physics during my university years. Did it ever occur to me to apply physics (and it was “Applied Physics”) to the issue of money? Of course not! Did it even enter my head that there could be any connection? Nope! I didn’t want to be an economist or an accountant for god’s sakes. I wanted to be a physicist. My head was in Astronomy and space science and all that stuff which makes me read David Icke and his followers posts and say “Oh for christ’s sakes give me a break!” I keep saying you don’t need science degrees to recognise shit is shit but then, perhaps you do. Perhaps science degrees actually create conspiracy theorists? For instance (and this is the perfect example from my perspective). The law of momentum – as well as a few other laws – simply doesn’t allow the wings of a 767 to slice through a steel building like butter. What amazes the hell out of me is that there are hardly any physicists actually coming out and saying “Just wait a goddamned minute here! THAT is just not possible!” So, when you know it isn’t possible and you know there are substantial numbers of physicists in the private/public and educational sectors who seem to be keeping their mouths shut about elementary physics on the day of 9/11, then you lose all respect for these people.
However, that’s not what this blog is all about. It’s about money and applying physical concepts to it. All very simple so don’t have a heart attack over it. It’s just, once more, I haven’t seen this done either and yet, to an extent, it stares us all in the face yet we ignore it and allow these criminals to continue crimes on humanity by starvation (for one thing).
Bodies at rest and in motion
A body at rest has its entire energy stored and is considered to have POTENTIAL energy. Simply, then, the body has the potential to do a certain amount of work but, currently, is not. Imagine a slingshot or a gun. The stone has the potential energy stored in it provided by the tension applied by the stretching of the rubber which will, eventually, release it. The bullet’s potential energy will be converted to KINETIC energy (movement of a mass) when the bullet is loaded into the barrel and the trigger creates the explosive FORCE which then propels it. When either the stone of bullet is released, they will do “WORK” and work is equal to Force multiplied by distance or W = Fxd.
So, the energy expelled from the point of release of the stone or the bullet until it, once more, comes to rest (hopefully in a Rothschild’s skull) is the Work done on the bullet or stone. The energy of either projectile is calculated by E = 1/2mV² where E is energy, m is mass and V is the velocity. Note that velocity is not the same as speed since the former is a vector quantity whereas the latter a scalar quantity. For the purposes of this blog however, we can take velocity as meaning speed since we assume the bullet or stone to be travelling in a singular direction. Simple then!
Power
Take all that expended energy then, that work done, and divide that amount of energy by time and what you arrive at is POWER. Now POWER can be expended OR it can be absorbed. In either case, it is a measure of work done over time. Tell me something? Why, if you were to work 24 hours a day while someone else played a round of golf for 3 or 4 hours and did nothing else, would you not assume to be more powerful than them?
Answer: You’ve EXPENDED your power while they, on the other hand, have ABSORBED your power. Muhammad Ali was good at that. He’d get his opponent to spend much of their power by absorbing the shocks of their punches (IF ever they actually landed one while, even throwing a punch expends energy and it’s lost. It tires his opponent).
So how does the politician or the banker absorb your power? You know the answer to that! They have you expend your energy constantly running after what they control – MONEY! MONEY is POWER! Yet money is literally only pieces of paper with very little mass and it doesn’t really do any work now does it?
Ah but it does!
Money (the paper) represents the very work (real work through expended energy) that you and I and everyone else does to make our living. If it truly represents that however then how is it that the CEO or Chairman of a company or the Head of state of a country or anyone of their Directors/politicians etc who, generally, don’t expend any energy whatsoever comparatively speaking, have more money than you who works every hour god sends just to keep a roof over your head and food on the table. Not only that but you may work in a vocation such as nursing – saving lives – or as a cleaner of whatever kind – thereby ensuring that our world does not decay and we’re over-run by rodents. Is it because of IQ? That’s what Boris Johnson would have you believe but let’s take him and George Osbourne for a moment.
Boris achieves a 2:1 degree in the classics at Oxford University. A second class degree in a “mongrel” course. What I mean by “mongrel” is that it covers everything from English literature to Archeology. A master of nothing then and finds IQ tests a bit of a problem.
George, meanwhile, is another 2:1, 2nd class achiever in History of all things. George has never run a business in his life. I’d be surprised if he knows how to read a spreadsheet – think about that. Yet, he is the Chief Financial Officer of the nation of the United Kingdom! A coke snorting, kinky black prostitute lover with a 2:1 in history. But then he does have experience of folding towels in Selfridges and entering date of dead people on a database.
But let’s see, how could two dumbfucks like that end up as power absorbers? Well, you just need to look at their parentage and then the fact that Boris gets a King’s scholarship and George a Demyship, both at Magdalen College.
Oh and they’re both, along with the present PM, ex Bullingdon boys rubbing their dicks up against the likes of Nat Rothschild.
Take a look at this article re the PPE students who just know, even as they enter college (they’ve achieved nothing so far but know they will – it’s pre-determined) that they will end up in the power absorption business in one way or another….
“The thing is this,” one graduate laughs, “PPE is such a big subject that no one can ever know everything, so we all have to bullshit like mad at times to cover up our ignorance. And we by and large get away with it. So we carry on bullshitting once we leave Oxford and most of us are still getting away with it.”
http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/sep/23/ppe-passport-power-degree-oxford
But let’s stay on the subject of the idea of IQ being the basis for one’s “success” – that “success” being measured by the British government (and other governments) in terms of economic success.
This is worth a read, if not purely from the perspective of reading the final conclusion which is:
“The results of Terman’s longitudinal study of gifted children suggest that IQ can play an important role in determining life success; but high IQ alone is not enough. Variables such as family background, socioeconomic status, and educational experiences as well as personality factors such as motivation, the willingness to work hard, being committed to goals, creativity, and emotional maturity are also strongly linked to success in life.”
http://psychology.about.com/od/intelligence/a/does-high-iq-equal-success.htm
Basically, your success in life is a product of your environment. Your environment also teaches you whether you will “go along to get along” or whether you will stand for what you believe to be right. These politicians and businessmen generally have two things in common: They drop from a fallopian tube which has, in one way or another, provides the “right background” – Osborne: Data entry clerk and folding towels in Selfridges. Think about it – plus their character has been moulded by influences which create either the “go with the flow” attitude or the opposite. I agree it isn’t quite as “black and white” so don’t go off on one but, as a general rule, this IS the case.
Now let’s consider the reality of what money is MEANT to be: A representation of one’s debt to another and a means of exchange of such obligations for the purpose of making it easier for a large society of people to buy and sell various goods without having to first find a specific person who requires the particular good/product/asset you wish to sell while that same person having physical goods or services (resources) which are a precise match in terms of value of what he wishes to purchase from you, thereby resulting in an exact exchange of value. The “Resource based economy” fans are totally missing this point and would hate the very thing they promote! It would be a bloody nightmare and would lead to the world being less connected and “one”. Do these people actually think before they open their mouths I wonder? I think not.
In this precise exchange of value (however achieved) you actually have an exact exchange of POWER. Mr X has exchanged Energy of Fxd with Mr Y’s energy of an exact equivalent. A fair exchange then. This is achieved even with the use of an exchange mechanism called “money”. The entire human race will then interact upon the exchange of debts which, across the entire 7 billion people on earth, cancel out. There is NO “Global debt” where, somehow, the entire human race is in debt to the tune of $trillions to some “unknown” entity – who is that entity? God? Martians? No, you KNOW who that debt is owed to – the Central banking system which, in itself, is controlled and owned by a cartel of private individuals NOT “the public” 😉
The question: WHAT WORK HAS THIS CARTEL UNDERTAKEN TO ARRIVE AT A POINT OF HAVING SUCH WEALTH AND POWER?
The answer: They have created a system which WE support wherein pieces of paper (now, actually, simply 1’s and 0’s in a computer) become the wealth and power.
The second question: DOES THAT PAPER, OR COMPUTER DIGITS, REPRESENT THE TRUE VALUE OF THE WORK DONE BY EACH INDIVIDUAL? CAN YOU REPRESENT ONE MAN’S E=1/2mV² BY THE VALUE OF THE PAPER OR DIGITS?
The second answer: No. You SHOULD be able to but not in the present system you can’t.
How obvious is this? Quite. Who digs the roads? Who builds (or even designs) the buildings and the bridges? Who saves the lives? Who keeps the streets clean? Who creates products or art/beauty? Who drills the oil? Who digs the gold/silver/uranium etc? Who manages the corporations or organisations which carry out these tasks? Who protects whether by way of Police or Armed forces? Who does all of this and everything else?
Answer: You, me and every last one of our “brothers and sisters” who actually find and are lucky to find employment.
Now you may say “Well a person working in a bank is employed and does a service too”. Yes, they do but the problem is they “provide a service” which is entirely unnecessary and does nothing more than prop up a fundamentally corrupt system of money. They could also be employed in a system which is entirely non corrupt and provide SIMILAR services.
The people who own this system only, in fact, have POTENTIAL ENERGY. They have never expended one ounce of that energy for the betterment of mankind. NOT ONE OUNCE! While, what’s even worse, is they absorb other people’s energy constantly and over time. Absorbing that energy and work done over time = Work Done/time = POWER. They are energy vampires – literally.
Let’s take a look at a recent release of the M2 money circulation in the USA by the St.Louis Federal Reserve. It actually tells us a lot when it’s considered in terms of physical equations and graphical analysis:
Now let’s apply the physical equations to this graph which represent what’s really going on:
1. Straight off the cuff you’ll notice the line itself is curved. This demonstrates that there is an acceleration of the amount of work being done (the increasing dollar amount of assets being procured) over time. Throughout the 1980s and the first half of the 1990s, the slope of the line was fairly shallow and by the mid 1990s, it was levelling off. This levelling off was a representation of the fact that the economy was stagnating – there was no growth which would allow increase asset purchase. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing for the vast majority of people because, hopefully, what I will show is that the subsequent acceleration of asset purchase (change in “Work done”) does not represent, in any way, an increase in wealth for the broader population but is, in fact, the transference of wealth/POWER to a tiny fraction of the population.
2. I’ve used the green areas superimposed onto the graph to show the massive change of area displayed between 2 years (late 1990s) and the 2 years (start of 2012 and end of 2013). Note that the grey columns represent recessionary periods (the last one starting in late 2007/early 2008 through to mid 2009). Ask yourself how it is possible that, during that recession of 2008/2009, there was a very significant inflexion point representing a massive acceleration of “WORK DONE”/increase in financial assets held when the market and the economy was crashing through the floor! HOW is that possible? Well, it’s possible because the was enormous sums of money being gained by a very few people through bail outs and government/public money being privatised (put into private hands) allowing those private individuals to then buy up very substantial amounts of assets. Further, the hedge funds which bet on the housing collapse (not a bet at all because it is insider knowledge/trading) then pumped even more profit from others misery into these same small few’s hands and allowed even more asset purchases.
3. How is it possible that the amount of work done by 300 million people in America could rise from the green area representing 2 years, in the mid/late 1990s to the size of the green area representing the last 2 years? Has the US suddenly had an enormous boom in manufacturing and production in the last decade and a half? No. Quite the opposite. While surely, the line should have fallen from 2010 until now pretty significantly but it hasn’t, it just keeps on growing! Impossible right? Well no, it’s not. It’s called “quantitative easing” and that QE is representative of “WORK DONE” which hasn’t been done at all! But the purchase of assets by this small few continues because of it and what the graph doesn’t show is that, as those assets are accumulated by the private banking/business cartel, the American government is sinking deeper and deeper into debt which means it has to find MORE ways of squeezing MORE “productivity” (money) out of you!
4. The green areas also represent something else however: Power!
Remember: Work Done (ΔEnergy)/time = POWER. Power can be expended and it can be absorbed. In this case, both are happening. The vast majority of people are expending their energy while it is being absorbed by the small few. AND IT IS ACCELERATING! Look at y2 – y1 in each case. The slope of the line has massively increased in recent years in comparison with the slope during the 1990s. This represents an acceleration of the transference of power from the vast majority of people (the 99% so to speak) to the minority (the 1%).
y2 – y1 (1990s) = $400billion. x2 – x1 = 2 years. The slope (acceleration of power transference) = 2
y2 – y1 (2013) = $2000billion. x2 – x1 = 2 years. The slope (acceleration of power transference) = 10
Now you may be able to understand, from a physics/maths perspective, why the following has occurred:
While Michael Meacher ( a blithering idiot and/or a “gatekeeper” – even if the latter then that is still proof he’s a blithering idiot) gives you the following data:
So why do I say Meacher is a blithering idiot? After all he “spoke out” about Bilderberg didn’t he? Forget he’s been in politics for decades and it took him to 2013 to eventually “speak out” at a time when it is so in the public’s consciousness and awareness anyhow that it gives the IMPRESSION that he is, in fact, doing something “dangerous” LOL If you had pointed it out to him even as few as 5 years ago or less, he would have replied (as Clarke and others did to me) in some condescending “palming off” fashion.
Here is why he’s a blithering idiot however: “instead of a more sensible Keynesian approach”. Again, he proves that our political “friends” cannot think outside the box and they work on the basis of “left and right” and “Keynes and Friedman and Austrian” economics – ALL of which support the existing paradigm of interest bearing debt. DEBT is not a problem – I have said before and will keep on saying it: We ALL are indebted to one another in each and every interaction we have which includes money or not. For example, I have a debt to you reader who I feel an obligation toward in replying to your comments if they are a question of me or on my writing. To reply is keeping to an (albeit unstated but nevertheless real) PROMISSORY OBLIGATION. Without such, there could be no interaction. All that money is (or should be) is a means of exchange of PROMISSORY OBLIGATIONS which represent the exchange of assets and value between people. INTEREST only occurs in this existing, corrupt (and unnecessary) system where the banks (again, unnecessary) are given the power to ISSUE money (not create it) and act as middlemen who then RE=PUBLISH our debts between ourselves and add on a NON EXISTENT “debt” called interest. They have created a system where their “money” has become, not an ‘idea’ for the representation of exchange but a tangible commodity in of itself. This is why people like George Soros and so many others “bet” on (or hedge) against currencies. In a REAL economy devoid of interest, they could not do this because there would be no such thing as inflation or deflation.
So Meacher stays in the box and tries to find a solution to a problem based upon a system which IS the fundamental problem. Speak mathematics and logic to the likes of Meacher and he’ll glaze over. Why? Because he’s invested in the existing system. His entire being is invested in that system and, additionally, he would have no idea of what you are talking about because once you say “it is the system which is wrong” that scares the living daylights out of him. George Osborne cannot possibly even understand today’s economics nevermind have a mind that can grasp an improvement. The man is an imbecile.
But back to the graph for a moment because here is the bottom line:
What happens when that slope becomes a vertical line?
No more work is being done and ALL power has been transferred.
As that slope increases and the time (years) narrow to months and weeks and days as the M2 circulation goes spiralling upward, what happens is that, eventually (theoretically but also in reality except for the fact they manage it) you are left with ALL power transferred – no “kinetic”energy left and it is all transferred to “potential” energy in the hands of a very very small few. And THAT is the goal for these people. Once they have all power absorbed by them, they no longer need money because they OWN every last resource which they have captured through governments coming good on their promissory obligations (Government bonds) to them. There is no activity left in the private economy from which to derive the payment of the debt because ALL resources (human and capital) have been absorbed by the central banking private owners.
Now, finally think about the proverbial “Free Energy” because this is exactly how it works. “Free energy” in the sense of a perpetual system which feeds off its own energy, is impossible. I really do hope you know this. Free energy in other ways such as harnessing the sun’s energy is another matter altogether but creating a machine which provides its own energy input from its own energy output, is going to come to a very quick demise.
In a self-powered system, due to the losses in the circuit, the input energy decreases thus decreasing the output energy, which results in lower input energy. That is, a slow decay, ultimately ending in zero power output.
Now, apply that to the monetary system. It is self powered because we get the money from the same source – central banks – right? THEN you have losses in the system because you introduce the loss by the addition of INTEREST right? Adding interest is exactly the same as, say, offering someone £100 but giving them only £90 because you have applied the charge upfront. It comes to the same result when he has to pay you back £100 even though, in real terms, only receiving £90.
Thus the “input energy” decreases, which decreases output energy which results in lower input energy. Slow decay resulting in zero power output because, due to having to make up for the “losses” we are selling off our very resources to pay the “loss” (the interest). We then end up with no resources which results in zero output. The system collapses in the sense we are left paupers and the central banks have all resources and all laws.
ALL our WORK DONE over time has ALL of our POWER expended. That POWER does not disappear. Energy/power is always conserved – the Conservation of Energy principle. The energy/power is simply changed into another form. What the people who own the world’s monetary system have done is exactly that. They have had us expend our energy and they ave absorbed it. The power is simply displaced. It still exists it is just it exists in THEIR hands. The thing is, they have achieved this through fundamental fraud by way of the interest bearing system they have introduced and still support. Indoingso, they have committed crimes against humanity that far outstrip anything we have ever experienced by a two bit dictator. But they own the system which has them own the law.
THEY HAVE MURDERED BILLIONS AND CONTINUE TO DO SO AND THEY WILL MURDER BILLIONS MORE.
AND OUR POLICE AND ARMED FORCES SUPPORT THIS SYSTEM IN THEIR IGNORANCE WHILE IT IMPACTS THEM AND THEIR FAMILIES.
That’s why I have a section named “Gross stupidity within society.
David Icke: The British Government happy to licence subversive broadcast content against themselves.
So, finally, OFCOM respond (with more to come I expect).
The British Government’s FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT written so extremely well to ensure that they don’t have to answer to you. You must vote for the government (of whatever colour) because “You the people live in a democracy”. But recognise this: YOU are NOT the “Public” and you never have been! I’ve known this for a long time but people appear unwilling or unable to acknowledge that which is in front of their face.
You vote for a controlled and regulated/licensed handful of “different” parties but not one of these parties (even the BNP or UKIP) would be allowed to operate as a political party unless they played by the rules laid down by the real powers. Every MP who takes a seat must swear an oath of allegiance. Who to do you think? Now given that Mr Icke is consistently undermining that very monarchy with his fables; If they took him as a serious threat, do you think for one moment they would give him a licence to “kill” (them)? Don’t be so BLOODY NAIVE!
Now let’s look at this response – although there isn’t much to look at. Well what’s new?
1. What IS “The public”? Because YOU are not IT!
“The people’s voice is not funded by the public in statutory terms”. I just LOVE this! Once again, the British government show their hand. “Statutory”. “In the public interest” once more shown to be the doublespeak which it is. “The public” is not you! “Private donations” is used, when it suits them, to suggest you are not a part of “the public”.
Now consider this VERY carefully: IF you are a private individual – which you are when you are donating your own funds (from what is essentially your bank account) – then you are NOT considered a part of the public. Ok? Are you with me so far? Good.
So then, really let this penny drop folks: The government is then removing your private funds through taxes to fund a “public” which is not you and you are not a part of. Let that thought linger in your head and consider it wisely. Imagine a lake and someone comes along with thousands upon thousands of buckets and removes the water and all that water is sitting in buckets on the land – individual buckets of water. Could any one of those buckets of water say “I am the lake”? (Think about that when you think about the control of our water supply by water companies too). So by statutorily differentiating between a lake and a bucket of water, they legally claim that the bucket of water has no say in relation to the lake. The problem is that, once they decide that you are a private person then, by default, the public no longer exists! And yet, you are to FUND the public! A non existent entity. It is theft. Wonderfully achieved I must say.
Let’s revisit the response from Julia Snape of the 24th October:
“… and does not require a public interest test”.
But I may say it does or you may say it does or we (however many “we” are) say it does but it doesn’t matter because neither you, nor I, nor we are “The public”. So WHO is “The public”? WE are considered private individuals when their STATUTORY legislation suits them. Now let’s go a little further into the “mindfuck” here:
If we are all private individuals and not the public, then why is it that the government then speaks about “members of the public” and that we all have a “public duty” to pay our taxes. A PUBLIC duty is a duty by members of the public! Yet we are not the public but private individuals. What they will argue is that, as a whole, we are the public. Now how would they know what is in the “public interest” without asking each and every member/individual who comprises the public, for their opinion on an issue? They don’t and never intend to. They obscure this by saying that, as a public (an electorate) we vote for our representatives who then speak on our behalf. However, when we speak with “our” representatives, they have no intention of speaking on our behalf and are whipped by the party whip to follow the party line.
Anyhow, I think you see the joke in all of this by now. You can be sure Julia is being paid too much to even think of it. And that is the control in a nutshell. Nothing to do with Lizards, just absolute corruption of a system. Systemic corruption.
2. “The People’s Voice has applied for and been granted a licence….”. Just note here it does not say “David Icke has applied for and been granted a licence…”. Note to all those Icke and TPV aficionados: You know all about the Corporate Person and yet your messiah and OFCOM are working hand in hand using the Corporate Person to evade the entire point. That being that David Icke – who is, YOU believe, attacking the very establishment giving him the licence – is being allowed to do so by using the very vehicle which the establishment has constructed. That is the Corporate Person of “The People’s Voice” which would not even exist if the establishment did not allow it to by granting it a Corporate Personhood! Having done so, it is also allowing that very corporate person to broadcast using one of its licences while knowing full well who and what David Icke is all about.
Bottom line: He is no threat so you’re all wasting you time, energy and hope, OR, alternatively, they know exactly where he is going and are happy for him to have you follow him. Two choices, take your pick because there is not a third one however much you may wish there to be. Just face it, you’re a gullible twat! 🙂
3. In responding that “The people’s Voice is not funded by the public…” it is clearly a disingenuous reply to what they fully understand the issue to be. Note also Julia’s reference to The People’s Voice website stating it is funded by private donations. Therefore, I can rest assured that, having not donated, that channel does not speak for me. So no matter how many times David Icke and his motley crew preach they are a voice of “the people” (which you would all consider to be “the public”), they are not. What is sad is that you who have donated think you are the people they are speaking for. However, they speak for you neither. They speak for themselves and their agenda and you are not allowed to question their agenda otherwise you are banned. “The Banned” are for those who wish to join the Icke club but it’s still very much a club and no matter how much you think you’re in it, you ain’t in it!
4. Regarding her answer to question 4. It, in fact, does confer a status on the business itself. That status is that of a Private Corporate Person. Meaning, if you have no share or interest (STATUTORILY) in it, then you literally have no say and no right to information about it. The Communications Act then enforces that right for the Corporate Person to have its privacy protected under the act. They can evade as much as they wish but that is actual fact of the matter. So while you cannot pierce the corporate veil (and Icke and Tabatabai know this), you have NO say and no control over anything they choose to do. It is NOT and never shall be your voice. As an example, Peter Tatchell appearing. What did TPV do? They spun their own dictate to you. It was very well put I must give them credit for that, but it was nevertheless a dictate: “We shall give everyone a voice”. Yes it makes great sense on one hand but, again, sit back and really consider how that plays out. They will give everyone a voice no matter what? How is it, then, that anyone and everyone who asks the questions I am asking or who posts my blogs on Icke or TPV’s sites, are then “dealt with”? How is it that such free speech is removed and deleted? They suggest they will give a voice to all sides about all subjects UNLESS the very subject is David Icke and TPV. Had Peter Tatchell come on the show and said what I’ve been saying he’d be cut out of the broadcast but no, he talks plainly in his own writings over the years displaying he’s supportive of paedophilia and that’s ok. Anything goes on Icke’s show except Icke. Further, Gareth states he will have to allow mainstream artists on his show too (and you’ll all agree with him and love to see them on because you think it will be promoting the kudos of the station). Again, his reasoning sounds like sense but, once more, sit back and consider all the angles. They have and they’ve done it well. What better for the channel than to get the mainstream people to embrace it? But then where does that leave you? You STILL love celebrity don’t you? And that is what they play on and by playing on it they will build that Private Limited Company at your expense.
5. “This exemption does not infer approval by OFCOM on the activities of that business”. Of COURSE it does! It could not be exempt in the first place if OFCOM had not approved the company as fit and proper! An incredibly disingenuous and evasive statement to make. Are you beginning to recognise the sheer arrogance, audacity and deception of these people?
6. Lastly: “The content broadcast by all licensees must COMPLY with the Ofcom Broadcasting code”. Hey David, Where’s your dance? Isn’t it more like “How high do you wish me to jump your worship?”
You’re hilarious mate you truly are!
Meanwhile what do we have from Richie Allen on his FB page?
Jonathan Cloono: Will the channel be on sky, freesat or free view (1 November at 16:15 via mobile)
Richie Allen: we were originally going to be an online service exclusively, but we’ve had an offer (which we are considering) to go on freest. (1 November at 18:11)
But, again, it’s bizarre. The Ickolytes will applaud this and get excited by the idea that it may be on terrestrial TV (which was ALWAYS the intention as Gareth Icke suggested in his little interview piece) and why David Icke and TPV always had the intention to get a licence (this is about business and such a business needs audience figures). Yet, Freesat is owned by the BBC and ITV.
THEY ARE ALREADY SELLING OUT (even to consider this is to display the willingness to sell out. What did Icke say about not accepting sponsorship from Monsanto yet he will consider launching the channel on a platform owned by the BBC!)
Freesat is a free-to-air digital satellite television joint venture between the BBC and ITV plc, serving the United Kingdom. The service was formed as a memorandum in 2007 and has been marketed since 6 May 2008.
Or is Richie talking about the SKY version of Freesat? If he is he should be a little more specific but anyhow..
So ask yourself a simple question: David Icke stated time and again that TPV would be free of all regulation right? He was launching the channel on the internet for that very reason he said. No licence was or would be needed so as to allow them to be free to broadcast what and how they wished. As Gareth said “No rules, who needs rules”. HOW, then could Gareth state that his show would eventually (therefore pre-planned) be broadcast on SKY? He would and will need a licence for that. That is why, ladies and gentlemen, I have said, from the very start of my postings on the subject of David Icke and TPV, that they already either had a licence, were applying for one or had every intention of getting one. These people aren’t too smart you know. They give themselves away at every turn.
Meanwhile, SKY just happens to have a Rothschild on its board. Deal with that one David!
“The changes were overseen by Nicholas Ferguson, Sky’s Senior Independent Non-Executive Director, working in close consultation with Lord Rothschild, Deputy Chairman, and Lord Wilson of Dinton, Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominations Committee, and were approved unanimously by the Board.”
http://corporate.sky.com/rns.aspx?PID=57d76ad4e9334d0698f0d5556fdbc60b
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=7685243&ticker=RCP:LN
Please review Icke’s own words once more. Honestly, you can’t make shit like this up. From 9.36 onwards.
Earthling 
5 comments