Morons!
I kid you not. I have people on twitter stating “12 years before Covid even arrived on the scene?” when replying to my blogpost “THE EPIDEMIC THAT NEVER WAS”.
Mental midgets surround us, people. Inadequate brain matter which, if I’m honest, has me conclude there really are people who, perhaps, need to go.
I never really gave much thought to how stupid some of the human race could actually be in the 21st Century but, my god, I don’t need to think about it because it appears out of the woodwork every day!
It’s scary! And it’s why this con has worked and why democracy works for them!
Today’s ‘education’ is shocking!
Now read the fucking thing!!
To: Phillips, Sara (ELS-LOW) Wed, 29 Dec at 01:56
Subject: Covid 19 remarks by Richard Horton
Sara,
I want you to read this and be honest with yourself…. You cannot possibly ignore this. If you do, you need your head looking at. Now, once you read it and understand what it is telling you quite plainly, you then need to speak with your boss. If he then tells you to shut up about it, you then know there’s something very wrong.
Article: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-epidemic-that-never-was-must-read/
“Earthling”
Ps: Now READ the fucking thing!!
Sara is Richard Horton’s (the Chief Editor of the Lancet) secretary.
To: Desmond Swayne Wed, 29 Dec at 01:59
Subject: For once in your life, have some balls!!
Desmond,
I want you to read this and be honest with yourself…. You cannot possibly ignore this. If you do, you need your head looking at. Now, once you read it and understand what it is telling you quite plainly, you then need to speak with your boss. If he then tells you to shut up about it, you then know there’s something very wrong.
Article: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-epidemic-that-never-was-must-read/
“Earthling”
Ps: Now READ the fucking thing!!
I’m getting so pissed off with the morons, the intellectually lazy, the cretins, those that are that fucking lazy to read more or listen to more than 5 mins worth of information and need to be spoon fed.
And THAT covers one hell of a lot of people! And it covers those who get excited by Michael O’Bernicia and Dolores Cahill and Reiner Fuellmich etc etc. who think “At least they’re doing something!”.
NO, THEY’RE NOT! THEY AND YOU JUST THINK THEY ARE! YOU CANNOT FIGHT IN THE COURTS AGAINST THOSE WHO CONTROL THE FUCKING COURTS! PERIOD!! THE COURTS ARE FICTION – THEIR FICTION!
SOME OF YOU WHO HAVE JUST WOKEN UP TO THIS ‘GAME’ ARE SO FUCKING NAIVE, GULLIBLE AND STILL SWALLOW THAT SHIT CALLED ‘HOPE’ THAT YOU DON’T WANT TO LISTEN TO REALISM! THAT ‘HOPE’ PILL IS JUST TOO FUCKING TASTY. YOU THINK THIS WHOLE THING DIES IF AND WHEN YOU CAN GET PEOPLE JUST TO “WAKE UP” TO COVID! HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DREAMING AND IN THE DREAM YOU THINK YOU’VE JUST WOKEN UP BUT YOU’RE STILL ASLEEP? THAT IS EXACTLY WHERE YOU ARE!
WE WILL GET NOWHERE UNTIL PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE WHOLE GODDAMNED THING – THE ‘BIG PICTURE’ AND THEN ORGANISE EN MASSE.
THE ‘BIG PICTURE’ INVOLVES THE MONEY, THE LAW, UNDERSTANDING COVID AND CLIMATE CHANGE AND HOW THEY ARE ONE AND THE SAME AND THEN UNDERSTANDING YOUR ENEMY WANTS TO ERADICATE 90% OF THE POPULATION. UNTIL YOU FULLY GET TO GRIPS WITH ALL OF THAT, FORGET IT!
Letter to the New York Times
I simply looked up their contact email and did not know, before writing this, what their stipulations were for writing to them. It wasn’t written from the perspective of getting them to publish the letter but simply to bloody act on it! Not that they would but someone’s gotta tell them they know this stuff!!
From: “Earthling”
Tue 28/12/2021 19:20
To: letters@nytimes.com
Dear Editor,
I simply wish to know how/why you cannot/will not bring this – your very own article from 2007 – to the attention of your readership?
Your own archive which questions (in fact, more than questions) the entire narrative of “Covid 19”.
Do not try and suggest to me that you are not aware of this article or it was just overlooked. Is it just that, since then, you were provided a substantial sum by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation?
“In an August 2020 piece, Tim Schwab noted that he found at least 15 NY Times columns where Bornstein or Rosenberg had written about Bill and Melinda Gates, the Gates Foundation, or Gates-funded organizations, without any mention they were being paid on the side by the Foundation through SJN. He recounted how he contacted Bornstein, Rosenberg, and their NYT editors, to inquire why there were no conflict-of- interest disclosures attached to these pieces.
Tina Rosenberg responded that “We do disclose our relationship with SJN in every column, and SJN’s funders are listed on our website. But you are correct that when we write about projects that get Gates funding, we should specifically say that SJN receives Gates funding as well…Our policy going forward with the NY Times will be clearer and will ensure disclosures.” https://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2021/08/ny-times-columnists-still-financially.html
| NYC Public School Parents: NY Times columnists still financially benefitting from Bill Gates largesse -without acknowledgement from the Times8/27/21: I’ve updated this with more recommendation for what Solutions Journalism should do to avoid these conflicts of interest in the futu…nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com |
And before you say it, yes I realise this funding was not direct to the NYT but let’s not play silly buggers!
The following includes your article from 2007:
The Epidemic that never was: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-epidemic-that-never-was-must-read/
As you will see in the blog, the incompetence of the scientific/medical community in initially accepting PCR tests as diagnostic, resulted in a false “epidemic” in Dartmouth and resulted in thousands of unnecessary vaccinations. The CDC documents (2017 & 2021) then support the outcome of the article by clearly stating that the PCR tests (those tests responsible for this entire “Covid Pandemic”) were (and are) not fit for purpose – as was plainly stated by Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, before he died.
Your unquestioning support of this “pandemic” displays either, ineptness or a willingness to be complicit in the fraud which it is.
Regards,
“Earthling” (real name supplied).
ps:
“I profiled one organization called the Solutions Journalism Network, which has received millions of dollars from the Gates Foundation (at the time, the foundation was the largest funder). The real problem with those grants is that the founders and directors of this Gates-funded organization are also frequent contributors to the New York Times, where they frequently write about the Gates Foundation — always in ways that are uncritical or favorable. So, after I did the story and did a follow up story, the New York Times finally issued corrections to disclose their financial conflicts of interest.
When you think about it, articles have been published at the highest level of journalism, the New York Times, about the Gates Foundation from journalists who have ties to it. So that, to me, became a really interesting story that allows you to see how far this influence travels.”
Arrticle: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/11/bill-gates-foundation-jeffrey-epstein-divorce-journalism
AUTOMATED REPLY
Letters, NYT <letters@nytimes.com>
Tue 28/12/2021 19:20
To: You
Thank you for your letter to The New York Times.
If your letter is selected for publication — in all editions (print and online) or only online, and possibly in The International New York Times as well — we will contact you within a week.
We regret that because of the large number of submissions we are not able to respond to all of them, other than by this automated reply. (You will receive an auto-reply only once every four days.)
Here are some guidelines:
Letters should ideally be 150 to 200 words and may be shortened to fit allotted space. They must be exclusive to The Times (no prior publication in other news outlets, except for nytimes.com). They should generally refer to an article that has appeared within the last seven days.
We reserve the right to edit all letters, and to trim to fit allotted space.
To be considered for publication, letters should include the writer’s name, address, current location (where you are writing from) and daytime and evening phone numbers at your current location (for verification, not publication). If you have a disability, we will make every effort to make accommodations in our communication with you.
We do not accept anonymous or open letters.
We generally do not publish more than one letter from the same writer within any 60-day period, but reserve the right to be flexible. (This applies to the daily letters page, but feel free to submit letters to the weekly sections.) If we select your letter for publication, you consent to our right to republish it, in any and all media, and to license third parties to publish it as well.
If you submit your contact information as a result of this automated reply, please re-send the letter with it. (In the subject line, please indicate the headline of the article you’re responding to, and delete “automated reply.’’)
Because of computer security concerns, we do NOT accept attachments; they will NOT be opened. Please re-submit your letter pasted into the body of an e-mail message.
——————————————————————————————————
It goes on but there’s zero point in pasting it all on here and it’ll go nowhere anyhow. However, if you were so inclined, it would be interesting to see if many people writing to them about it would have any effect. But then again, nobody will I guess. Apologies for the negativity but I’ve had 15 years of people doing bugger all and that includes people like Icke and UKColumn and others. All talk (like me) but they have huge audiences and yet they cannot/will not work together and organise. All just bloody talk! Same with Alex Jones on the other side of the pond.
I watched the Netflix movie called “Don’t look up!” last night and I couldn’t help laughing (in despair) at the piss they were taking out of everything and everyone by holding up a mirror to us all and saying “That is what you are!” – inept, cretinous fools more interested in “likes” and celebrity; Filled with platitudes and having to keep things ‘light’. Oh my God! Did I see so many people in that movie! Did the actors even recognise what they were doing? Essentially, taking the piss out of the worldwide population that take them seriously and laughing at them. They hypocrisy and the lack of depth in anything at all was a precise reflection of what we’ve become and why, at the end, they all fucking die! Frankly, they deserved it. So considering it’s a reflection on our present reality, I’d have to say so do we.
Some interesting little points and digs made it in it however. Two of which were:
- Trust in scientists (and that little UN useful idiot – whatshisface – was the main one)
- I’m sure they were having a dig at Elon Musk with the old, grey haired billionaire character.
Dr Susan Hopkins: Exposes herself as a liar
Every time you get a yes/no question and you do not answer it yes or no while you keep repeating a ‘mantra’ over and over again when continuously asked the same question: You are a liar by omission. This exposes the sheer deception of a Doctor which the British public are putting their trust and faith in.
The British public really need to understand what it is they are dealing with when it comes to the people they are relying on for honesty because, across the board, no honesty exists. Why? Because, across the board, these people have lied to you from the outset.
Here is Doctor Susan Hopkins:
Bear in mind this woman is getting paid a fortune and is lying to you.
Doctor Susan Hopkins is the Public Health England theme lead for the Innovations in Behaviour Change theme of the HPRU in HCAI and AMR at Imperial College.
So, another Neil Ferguson type: An Imperial College liar.
She is also a SAGE advisor.
Remember this face. I know you’d rather not but if ever the time comes to hold these people to account, she will be one of them as will Jenny Harries the communist.
These are the people who will have attended Prince Charles’ speech in 2015 at the Royal Society where he impressed his worldview on the Doctors and Nurses to treat the planet as a patient. Again, people do not understand what they are dealing with while they line up for the jabs and boosters.
Nothing is actually hidden (except the ‘smoking gun’ admission and why would criminals give you that?). It is all available to be found. You have seen Imperial College’s document on finding a new way to frame “climate change” and why they had to. You have seen, in previous posts, the multitude of documentary evidence showing you they chose to reframe it as a health issue. You have seen all those dictating to you what you must do re masks and lockdowns, social distancing etc all outright lying to you as they break the rules themselves and why? Because they know “Covid” is a non existent, statistical disease being used to create the behaviour change they want to allow significantly greater control over people and their movements and consumption patterns (to ostensibly protect them from the virus but, in reality, it is to meet carbon emission targets over the following 10 to 30 years – 50% reduction by 2030 and 100% by 2050 – “Net zero”).
Those of us who understand this watch you who don’t and we know we cannot get through to you so, in essence, we are allowing you to take those ‘vaccines’ while we know there is a very dark agenda behind them. We’re sorry but what can we do? You won’t listen. You will just revert to ridicule and “Conspiracy theorist” as you listen to the authorities.
One last thing I wish to say to those of you who refuse to listen: ALL of the things they are shutting us unvaccinated out of doing, are things which, in time, they will shut you out of too because, again, it is all to do with carbon emissions and they will have to – at some point in the future – come up with further reasons to convince you that you no longer can participate in such events etc, either.
We know you don’t believe us and, again, you will never listen but I’m just putting it out there so I can turn, in years to come, and say “I told you”.
One final thing however: How many times, recently, have you heard or read “the conspiracy theorists were right again!”?
You see, here is why you have been taught to mock the “conspiracy theorists”. It’s so very easy. We are people (not all I admit. Some are off their rocker and, unfortunately, we then all get tarred by the same brush) who have researched deeply into politics, history and read copious amounts of material (for me, it has been all their own documents and journals plus parliamentary and congressional archives in the main) and, by doing so, can follow the steps they take and have taken; Read between the lines on news items and “pandemics” appearing, apparently, “out of the blue”. We understand what their ultimate purpose is and when you understand that, it is all very easy to follow.
You simply haven’t done that and they don’t want you to. Hence: “Don’t listen to those Conspiracy theorists”. Your ignorance, however, is creating the very conditions you wish to alleviate and maintains the statistical disease which is scaring you. Perhaps you’d rather believe in a statistical disease than face up to what is even scarier for you: A group of people hellbent on controlling you and reducing the world’s population.
What you are experiencing is true terrorism. Not by a fundamental islamist however.
Medical communism via a needle
“We have lived our lives by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world. We have been wrong. We must change our lives so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption, what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and learn what is good for it.” Wendell Berry, From The Long-Legged House (1969)
The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health first met in Bellagio, Italy, in July, 2014. Chaired by Andy Haines of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the Commission is a diverse group of global experts in environmental health, medicine, biodiversity, and ecology who reached a powerful consensus around key messages and the urgency of planetary health as an idea in jeopardy. The Commission’s report outlines three challenges that must be addressed to enhance human health in the face of unprecedented environmental challenges.
First, a conceptual challenge to account for the future health and environmental harms to development and prosperity that many countries face. Second, knowledge and information challenges, including lack of transdisciplinary research and a failure to identify the social and environmental drivers of ill health. Finally, governance challenges.
Planetary health is a new science that is only beginning to draw the coordinates of its interests and concerns. It demands new coalitions and partnerships across many different disciplines to meet the pervasive knowledge failures identified by this Commission. It demands new attention to governance and implementation. And, perhaps most of all, it demands more creative imagination among scientists and practitioners working in health—redefining the meaning of human progress, rethinking the possibilities for human cooperation, and revitalising the prospects for the health of human civilisations.
We thank The Rockefeller Foundation for their generous financial support to The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health and for hosting meetings in Bellagio, Italy, and New York, USA. We thank Andy Haines for his chairing of the Commission and Sarah Whitmee for her lead authorship. We thank Tim Shorten for project management of the Commission and Micheline Kennedy of GMMB for leading communications around global launches. We thank Commissioners for their commitment to this Commission report and its dissemination, and peer reviewers for their thoughtful contributions to the process. We also thank the participants of The Rockefeller–Economist Visionaries Unbound Planetary Health workshop for providing Commissioners with a broad background discussion to focus the first Commissioners meeting.
Steve Baker: ‘Rules’
One of the “angry conservatives” but, as you can hear, he’s simply angry that Boris was caught out flaunting the rules. He doesn’t question the rules. Everyone should follow the rules.
But what IF, Steve, there should be no rules to follow?
Never, will any of these “rebels” question or even allow a dialogue regarding the reality of “Covid 19”. The cult of “Covid 19” is too high up the chain way above their pay grade. Again, like debating masks and vaccine rollouts etc etc, they can and will debate parties in No.10 etc but never will they allow, or enter into any debate on the fundamental: “Does Covid exist?” because then their career is over. Then they are demonised. Then, if they are influential enough (which none of them are), their life is on the line.
Do not, ever, suggest to me that there is one British MP we can trust and who has balls. They’re all parliamentary eunuchs.
Steve, nor Desmond, nor any of them will ever dare to have a conversation based on the above tweets. Neither will they come under pressure by the public to have these conversations because the public read them and think “WTF?” The public have zero understanding of what these mean and how they connect.
The public think there is a virus because “there can’t not be”. The idea of an immensely monstrous lie being promulgated by their government cannot be entertained in their little heads.
So, on top of throwing stuff at Baker on twitter – a complete and utter waste of time – I send yet another email to John Lamont MP (another waste of time sent to a waste of space):
Plan B & Plan C: If ONLY the hospitality sector would listen!!
All I ask is that you please consider sharing this video wherever and with whoever possible. I created it earlier this year and, of course, my entire youtube channel was then shut down not long afterward. I cannot, for the life of me, understand how people in this industry can watch and listen and not grasp what is going on.
The Alcohol/Hospitality carbon attack: https://s3.wasabisys.com/billgateswantstokillus.com/index.html#/videos/Earthling/OPEN_YOUR_PUBS_BARS_AND_RESTAURANTS-XN3DOyDZME4
Email to the “angry conservatives”.
Don’t think for a minute these people will ever, truly, challenge the system or the accepted wisdom. They won’t. They’re mice, not men.
The blog referred to: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/11/17/the-nexus-a-full-explanation-of-the-construction-of-covid/
Boris: You sick bastard!
Before I go on, I should state that the “sick bastard” label applies to everyone in the British Government from the Queen down. Until you understand this and why, then you understand nothing wrt “Covid”.
All for the sake of reducing a few carbon emissions. But then reducing carbon based entities helps too so every death that has happened during the course of this past two years, due to any cause, is probably what the No.10 parties were for.
Do NOT forget!!
A PATHOGEN WHICH DOES NOT EXIST! YOU BASTARDS!
Allegra Stratton is a liar
So sue me Allegra!
You lying, piece of shit filled with crocodile tears as you say more about climate change and COP 26 than you do anything else.
You’re not sorry for anything except you were exposed. Like every last government minister, backbencher, you are a lying, deceitful, duplicitous piece of shit.
Yes indeed, COP26 and the Prime Minister’s actions on “Climate Change” (which, in fact, “Covid” is all about) will have a long lasting impact on the world. BUT NOT A GOOD ONE AS YOU WELL FUCKING KNOW, YOU BITCH!
Your “tears” mean fuck all sweetheart! But they’re what get most women off the hook! No disrespect to ALL women (but a damned good few of you) but this woman is full of as much shit as the people she worked for and she will walk back into that house and laugh at. you all once more. Ignoring the fact her face looks like the back end of a bus, Allegra Stratton (that name says all you need to know) will come out of this perfectly fine; Will pick up some other cozy little job (like they all do) – probably with some ‘green’ outfit somewhere – and will continue the fucking lies about “the planet dying” while laws and regulations are going to be put in place which she, as a press secretary, helped to propagandise this utter shit you know as “climate change”.
The woman, like a lot of them, should be hung!
Depopulation underpins everything.
People just seem to refuse to listen no matter what you present to them. The detail you go into and the time you take to explain makes not one iota of a difference. They simply refuse to believe it. Yet, even when it is not hidden and ‘they’ come right out and say it, STILL they will wear their masks and take their shots. They STILL think Climate Change and Covid are two entirely different issues, even now.
One really loses one’s faith in human intelligence. Why, I may say (no excuse meant) I sometimes lose my cool in my writing and ‘lash out’ at what I consider the morons and the intellectually ‘infirm’. It is because of them, I and all you who know, are tearing our hair out (and I don’t have much left as it is!).
Democracies work so well for the tyrannical because democracies are composed of a “bathtub” of intellect. The average intellect is considered to be ‘100’ which means 50% of the world’s population has less than average intelligence. I’m not even happy with ‘100’. I don’t think you’re what one would consider of decent intellect until you’re at about ‘120’. That said, does it even come down to intellect as we measure it? there are PhDs out there who have bought into this shit! That’s what astonishes me even more and leaves me speechless. “What can be wrong with this bugger’s brain?” I end up asking myself.
She speaks of the population 500 years ago. In the year 1500, the approximate population of the earth was 500 million. This is a figure which has been spoken of by many (and the Georgia Guidestones) as the optimum population.
What does it take to ‘wake’ people up?
I think (am sure) the one thing that stops people from understanding any of this is that they don’t/can’t observe it from the perspective of there being a group of very powerful people who want to inherit the earth and are willing to kill (not through war) to achieve a depopulation of the planet. They just can’t fathom that such people exist because they have not read the history of these people and their philosophy. You will never get through to most because most simply will not take this as even possible, yet it is so simple.
Have you ever been at an event of some kind or lived somewhere and found yourself being surrounded by what you considered ‘riff raff”? Be honest, now. You ‘dehumanise’ them in your mind and you feel justified in doing so due to their actions and, possibly, language. Imagine you had the power to remove them all (in some way) so you may continue to live in your area or enjoy the event on your terms.
Now apply that to the world where the world is THEIR turf and most of the 7 billion of us are the “riff raff”. That’s it in a nutshell. It’s that simple and that real.
The Pandemic Crystal Ball
Who knows how ‘prestigious’ (and in the know) Foreign Policy journal is? And who knows of its connection to the Council on Foreign Relations and, therefore, to the RIIA (or “Chatham House”)?
Here: In your face 20th September 2019. Written one month before Event 201.
But you don’t read these things, do you? You don’t know what these institutions are. You didn’t even know they existed!
So, to all you dismissives out there: Explain it (logically). Can’t wait to hear it!
But I already know what so many of you will say: “Just coincidental timing since people have been speaking about a pandemic event for years now. It just means these guys were the most recent to write about it before it happened!” Or you’ll think “Ah but these are very smart people who can extrapolate extremely well”. But all your justification is just due to your unwillingness to face a far darker but far more likely explanation.
I say read my previous posts showing how, over the past decade or two, they have desperately rewritten the narrative of climate change and fed it into the public consciousness as a health threat. I say that the writing and fear mongering of these others talking about an ‘impending pandemic’ has been purposefully driven by that need to rewrite the climate change narrative. One article in a newspaper somewhere, at some point, doesn’t quite achieve it! It needs to be seeded and then fed over time to grow it and make the narrative live and be viable!
“A new independent report, compiled at the request of the United Nations secretary-general”.
Well his “independent report” told him what he wanted to hear from the ‘crystal ball’ just as his IPCC ‘independent’ scientists tell him what he wants to hear about global temperatures.
The original article: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/09/20/the-world-knows-an-apocalyptic-pandemic-is-coming/
Blair’s job: Pushing Prince Philip’s Global Eco-Fascism
Copied and reprinted from EIR (Executive Intelligence Review) July 1997….. (originally titled: “Tinny Blair Blares For Prince Philip’s Global Eco-Fascism”)
This report is intended to update the story, and to situate the recent public launching of a series of flagrantly pro-genocide organizations in Canada, the United States, and Britain, that are flooding the Internet with propaganda advocating the elimination of 80% of the human race over the next one to two generations.
You cannot read this and not recognise that it was prescient in its content. I’d say “eerily so” but eerily suggests it’s just luck somehow. It’s not luck, it’s the recognition of the agenda.
The British monarchy’s newly installed mouthpiece, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, has wasted no time in launching the latest phase of the Club of the Isles’ drive to reduce world population by 80%, and impose a “green” feudal world order throughout the planet. After successfully wrecking the June 20-22 Summit of the Eight in Denver, Colorado, with a combination of temper tantrums and clever ploys that set his European cohorts against the host government of President Bill Clinton, Blair moved on to New York City, where he addressed the United Nations “Earth Summit II” on June 23. In his speech, and in a follow-up press statement by his Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, the Blair government made it clear that London still considers the very existence of the United States to be a grave insult to the Empire, and that it intends to use an array of pseudo-scientific hoaxes to bring the United States to its knees.
Blair assailed the Clinton administration for failing to capitulate to Prince Philip’s global eco-fascist apparatus, and vowed that Britain will “take the point” in ramming through a series of United Nations ecological conventions and treaties that, taken as a whole, will drive the world economy back to the Stone Age. In the same breath that he was lambasting President Clinton for failing to buy into the green agenda, he lavished praise on his own predecessor, the Tories’ former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, for her sterling efforts on behalf of “the environment.”
The British press made no secret of Blair’s “Green Crusade” against the United States. Beneath a banner headline, on the day of Blair’s UN speech, the London Guardian proclaimed that Blair’s address would be a “thinly disguised attack on America,” for failing to curb so-called greenhouse gas emissions. On the same day, the London Times headlined its coverage, “Summit Clash Between the European Union and the United States,” over the environment.
Blair and Cook prominently flaunted their commitment to forcing a “radical change in lifestyles”–a euphemism for murderous austerity–in accordance with the morass of “global warming,” “ozone hole,” and related anti-science ecology hoaxes. During the Denver summit, Cook, according to the London Daily Telegraph of June 23, had singled out the United States as the worst offender, stating: “At the moment, the biggest single problem is that the American public has not yet grasped, that if it continues with its present lifestyle, then it is going to make it impossible for its children or grandchildren to enjoy the kind of environment, and therefore the kind of lifestyle that the Americans have today.”
Here is an excerpt from the New York Times reporting on the summit:
Paradoxically, the same City of London press shamelessly lied, in attempting to simultaneously paint Tony Blair and Bill Clinton as “two peas in a pod,” who have revitalized the badly damaged Anglo-American “special relationship.” On June 24, the London Times, which had reported on the transatlantic rift in Denver (but omitting the fact that Blair had created it), lied that the personal relationship between Clinton and Blair has become so tight, that Blair has been designated as the “linkman” between Washington and continental Europe.
Indeed, one of the reasons that the Queen’s Privy Council had hand-picked Blair as John Major’s successor, was to soften up President Clinton for the kill. So far, British media lies aside, that effort has been a thorough flop. In Denver, President Clinton barely made time to confer with Blair, while he devoted most of his time on June 20 to long private sessions with several other summit partners, especially Russian President Boris Yeltsin. And when he did briefly sit down in private with Blair, the sole topic of discussion was the situation in Northern Ireland, which has been a sore point in Washington-London relations ever since President Clinton came into office vowing to mediate a settlement of the long-standing crisis. And, in what was publicly explained away as a minor logistical gaffe, there was no chair set out for Blair at the opening heads of state banquet later that evening.
Blair’s filthy efforts in Denver and New York City were not lost on EIR contributing editor Lyndon LaRouche, who, in response to the report that Blair intends to demand enactment of a binding 10% reduction in so-called “greenhouse gases” at the upcoming UN Climate Control Convention in Kyoto, Japan in December, said on June 27, “If Blair were sincere about the emission of noxious gases, he would travel less and stop talking more.” He further commented on Blair in an interview with the weekly “EIR Talks” international radio broadcast of June 24: “Look behind the mask, at the reality. Don’t say, `He’s the new bright guy in the neighborhood.’… He’s not. He’s a nasty reptile, and the sooner that the United States realizes that, the better policymaking will go.”
EIR called the shots
Blair’s public performance in Denver and New York City should come as no surprise to regular readers of EIR. For more than a year, this magazine has been writing about the British monarchy’s plans to dump the thoroughly used-up John Major and install a new prime minister, cut in the image of Ramsay MacDonald, the Depression-era prime minister who forged a national unity regime involving his Labour Party, the Conservatives, and the Liberals, with strong, albeit informal support from the British Union of Fascists.
In fact, the principal distinction between the “thoroughly modern” “Tinny” Blair and Ramsay MacDonald is that, today, as the result of a 35-year effort, personally led by Prince Philip and his Dutch counterpart, Prince Bernhard, a worldwide eco-fascist structure is already well-entrenched throughout the globe, particularly within the British Commonwealth, and in the United Nations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund bureaucracies, whose stated purpose is to carry out levels of population genocide that would make Adolf Hitler’s crimes pale by comparison.
EIR first documented the role of Prince Philip as the “new Hitler” in “The Coming Fall of the House of Windsor,” on Oct. 28, 1994. Since then, EIR has published a series of in-depth stories, detailing aspects of the global eco-fascist apparatus and its links to the London-headquartered Club of the Isles financial oligarchy. This report is intended to update the story, and to situate the recent public launching of a series of flagrantly pro-genocide organizations in Canada, the United States, and Britain, that are flooding the Internet with propaganda advocating the elimination of 80% of the human race over the next one to two generations.
Her Majesty’s Royal Virus
It is no exaggeration that the Prince Philip- and Prince Bernhard-led worldwide ecology movement is devoted to mass genocide–not to saving dolphins and defenseless furry creatures. Take the British Royal Consort at his own words.
In August 1988, in an interview with Deutsche Presse-Agentur, Prince Phi lip stated:
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
Earlier, in the foreword to his 1986 book If I Were an Animal, Prince Philip wrote:
“I just wonder what it would be like to be reincarnated as an animal whose species had been so reduced in numbers that it was in danger of extinction. What would be its feelings toward the human species whose population explosion had denied it somewhere to exist…. I must confess that I am tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus.”
While there is no evidence that Prince Philip has yet been reincarnated thusly, there is ample evidence that the British Royal Consort and de facto chief operations officer of the London-centered Club of the Isles, has devoted the last 36 years of his life to death and destruction, beginning with his 1961 founding of the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), now known as the World Wide Fund for Nature.
Prince Philip’s principal collaborators in launching the WWF as a funding and worldwide operations arm of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, were Sir Julian Huxley and Max Nicholson, both ardent advocates of eugenics and racial purification. In fact, Huxley was president of the Eugenics Society when he co-founded the WWF. First, as head of the United Nations Educational, Social and Cultural Organization (Unesco), and later as a WWF founder, Huxley preached the need to revive race science and the urgent mission of “culling the human herd”–particularly of the darker-skinned races of Africa and South America. In the founding document of Unesco, Huxley had frankly acknowledged the difficulties he would encounter in reviving eugenics, in light of the Nazi genocide. “Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible,” he wrote, “it will be important for Unesco to see that the … public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
The method Huxley and others devised for forcing people to “think the unthinkable,” was to replace the idea of eugenics with the idea of environmentalism. Huxley, Prince Philip, and the others, however, understood that, in their way of thinking, the two terms were interchangeable. During a 1960 tour of Africa, on the eve of the launching of the WWF, Huxley openly boasted that the ecology movement would be the principal weapon used by the British oligarchy to impose a Malthusian world order over the dead body of the nation-state system, and, most importantly, the United States.
It is no coincidence, in the context of Huxley’s remarks, that the man who helped found the Canadian branch of Prince Philip’s WWF, Maj. Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, would be implicated by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Bloomfield, the wartime liaison of the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, ran the Montreal-based Permindex Corporation, the entity identified in the Garrison investigation as the hands-on controller of the Kennedy assassination plot.
The 1001 Club and Other Eco-Fascist Fronts
To further spread the work of the WWF, in 1970, Prince Philip teamed up with a former SS officer, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, already a prominent player in the WWF, to create a permanent funding mechanism for the growing number of ecology fronts being spawned, to scoop up the dregs of the late-1960s counterculture, and deploy them as the storm-troopers of the new “green” fascism.
The 1001: A Nature Trust, known among its members as the “1001 Club,” was created as an adjunct to Prince Bernhard’s well-known Bilderberg Group, the Cold War-era secret society of leading North American and European oligarchical insiders–1,001 close personal associates of Prince Bernhard and Prince Philip were “invited” to join the 1001 Club at an initial fee of $10,000 per person.
The bulk of the members were drawn from the boards of directors of the leading Club of the Isles raw materials cartels, banks, insurance companies, and family trusts (the fondi). Typical of this caste were John Loudon, former CEO of Royal Dutch Shell and chairman of Shell Oil Co., who served from 1977 until his death as president of the WWF; Maurice Strong, head of the Canada-based Power Corporation, and one of the most important of the WWF operators; Baron Aubrey Buxton of Alsa, of Barclays Bank; Bertold Beitz, director of Alfred Krupp von Bohlen and Halbach Foundation; Conrad Black, chairman of Britain’s leading media cartel, the Hollinger Corporation; Peter Cadbury, of the George Cadbury Trust; Anton Rupert, of the South African Rembrandt tobacco interests; Sir Kenneth Kleinwort, owner of Kleinwort Benson, one of Britain’s oldest investment banks; and Henry Keswick, chairman of Jardine Matheson and brother of John Keswick, the chairman of Hambros Bank and a director of the Bank of England.
Maj. Louis Mortimer Bloomfield was a 1001 Club charter member, as were a number of notorious scoundrels, including swindler-bankers Robert Vesco and Edmond Safra.
By the time Princes Philip and Bernhard had assembled the $10 million war-chest, the first of the leading eco-fascist front groups and think-tanks had already been launched. In 1969, a Sierra Club official, David Ross Brower, founded Friends of the Earth, which, several years later, would help spawn such overtly terrorist groups as Greenpeace and Earth First!. The same year, WWF Chairman Sir Peter Scott launched Survival International, originally known as the Primitive Peoples Fund, which, three years later, spawned Cultural Survival.
In 1968, Aurelio Peccei, a former executive of Fiat (Fiat President Gianni Agnelli was a charter member of the 1001 Club), founded the Club of Rome, another by-invitation-only organization, to peddle a new, computer-age brand of Malthusianism. In 1970, with a grant from the Volkswagen Foundation, Peccei hired Massachusetts Institute of Technology computer whiz-kid Jay Forrester, and a team of his students, to prepare a report on the world population crisis, which was published several years later under the title Limits to Growth. Using a fraudulent concept of “carrying capacity” that completely ruled out human scientific discovery, Forrester and his students, Dennis and Donella Meadows, claimed that a combination of overpopulation and resource depletion would wreck the planet. The Club of Rome became not only a leading “establishment” lobby for every wacky environmental hoax; it launched the zero population growth movement, which has now devolved into a demand for drastic world population reduction–i.e., genocide.
“Ah love! Could thou and I with fate conspire,
to grasp this sorry scheme of things entire,
would not we shatter it to bits and then,
remould it nearer to the heart’s desire.”
Club of rome: “The First Global Revolution”
We are presently seeing the “shatter it to bits” phase while we are being told that the “remoulding” phase is called “Build Back Better”.
During the same build-up phase, Ford Foundation President McGeorge Bundy launched a joint project with the Soviet government, the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), headquartered in Laxenburg, Austria, to begin the process of peddling the radical ecology, zero-growth mania into the Warsaw Pact. By the time that Mikhail Gorbachov came to power in the Kremlin in 1985, a whole segment of the Soviet nomenklatura had turned from “red” to “green.”
Kissinger’s NSSM-200
With the drug-rock-sex countercultural “paradigm shift” under way, in the early 1970s Prince Philip’s minions launched a string of publicity stunts to accelerate the recruitment to their top-down irrationalist movement. In 1970, Maurice Strong sponsored Earth Day, to place a spotlight on the WWF agenda. In 1972, in Stockholm, Strong organized a United Nations conference on the environment, which further accelerated the proliferation of unscientific hoaxes. Out of that conference, the UN launched the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), whose first director was Strong. In 1974, another UN conference, on population, took place in Bucharest, Romania, in which the same cast of characters, using the Club of Rome’s Malthusian propaganda, openly advocated population control.
By this time, Kissinger, the self-confessed agent of the British Crown, was deeply ensconced in both the White House and the State Department, serving simultaneously as national security adviser and secretary of state under Presidents Nixon and Ford. On Dec. 10, 1974, Kissinger wrote National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200), “Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security Overseas Interests,” in which he singled out 13 nations for drastic population reduction, in order to secure the uninterrupted flow of vital raw materials to the United States and its allies.
In the 23 years since Kissinger inserted Prince Philip’s genocidal agenda into the U.S. national security doctrine, the World Wildlife Fund and its extended eco-fascist apparatus has been responsible for unprecedented levels of genocide in Africa, Ibero-America, and other vulnerable spots on the planet.
A New Phase Today
In EIR’s “The Coming Fall of the House of Windsor” report, we exposed the direct hand of the WWF in triggering the outbreak of “tribal” warfare in the Great Lakes region of Central Africa. Nearly three years later, that genocide continues unabated. As you will read in this present report, one of the architects of the mass killing, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, is a prominent figure in the WWF apparatus, hob-nobbing with Maurice Strong protèé and current World Bank President James Wolfensohn, and chairing one of the leading ecology “study projects,” 2020 Vision.
As part of the depopulation and chaos fostered by Prince Philip’s green legions, has come the biggest raw materials grab in modern history–led by the Club of the Isles cartels. In effect, Prince Philip, his underling Tony Blair, et al. have launched a new British imperial revival, modeled on the eighteenth- and nineteeth-century British East India Company, with its private armies, and its corporate sovereignty over large tracts of land, ripped from the hands of nation-states. Today, relics of the heyday of the British Empire, such as Crown Associates and the Corps of Commissionaires, are directly running the affairs of state for such London puppets as Museveni, and are deploying private armies made up of “former” British SAS officers, now employed by companies such as Executive Outcomes, Defense Systems, Ltd., KAS, KMS, etc. Under the new imperial mandate, the agenda is now explicitly the depopulation of the globe.
Barry the Bullshitter!
Meet Barry.
Barry is the biggest bullshitting prick on Planet Earth. I say that because I don’t think he can be stupid for, if he is, then he is the most monumentally stupid prick on Planet Earth!
Barry wears his hair in an ‘Einsteinian” fashion to make himself appear intellectual. Barry is an intellectual! But I’m about to explain why that word doesn’t account for much.
Barry is an Emeritus Professor at the London School of Economics (‘Emeritus’ meaning retired. Past his sell by date). Barry really is a ‘useless eater’.
Before getting into the “meat” however, let me make sure you’re acquainted with the LSE: London School of Economics. All you need to know in a nutshell.
Now, I know you’ll wonder at the following and why I include it. Well it’s simply because this literature and other media would not have references to the LSE as they do unless they had their basis in fact and those who are in the know would pick up on the “in jokes”.
Then you have this guy who is a “God” to those in the LSE. So, from terrorists to financial terrorists who wish to restructure society, the LSE has them all!
And no, your majestic one, the LSE would have never seen it coming as I will soon explain!
Ok. Now back to Barry and his arbitrary dispensary of dysentery…
Barry is the ‘father’ (or one of them) of “Securitisation theory” which readers of my blog will be well acquainted with by now.
A fundamental tenet of Securitisation theory, within the sphere of International Relations (IR) is:
“A ‘threat’ can be socially constructed by a ‘Speech Act’ given by a perceived authority figure, figures or institution and, if successfully transmitted/broadcast such that the ‘audience’ accepts it, it can be considered ‘securitised’. This ‘securitisation’ of the threat however, does not mean that there exists an actual, objective threat. The ‘threat’ need not be real but simply accepted as a threat by the audience which, usually in such circumstances, will trust the authority.”
Here is an article written for “International Affairs” (Chatham House) in September 2019. It is clear and precise.
This process follows the securitizing logic of the Copenhagen School,7 according to which any issue can be perceived as a security threat ‘not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ to a receptive audience.8 Thus, the key to this understanding of health securitization is not the actual ‘threat’ of a pathogen but a successful speech act or narrative ‘through which an intersubjective understanding is constructed within a political community to treat something as an existential threat to a referent object by a securitising actor, [generating] endorsement of emergency measures beyond the rules that would otherwise bind’,9 or a suspension of so-called ‘normal politics’.
I really do not know how to make this clearer to people.
Please read the segment in bold, above, again and again, if need be, until it sinks in.
“any issue can be perceived as a security threat ‘not necessarily because a real existential threat exists but because the issue is presented as a threat’ to a receptive audience.”
“Intersubjective” means an agreed and accepted understanding between people (the Actor and his audience). Each individual being a ‘subject’ so “intersubjective”.
“Referent object” is the object under threat. i.e. in the case of a pathogen, the population.
Now, to drill this “it need not be a real threat” home: You will remember the 2003 Invasion of Iraq and Tony Blair’s “dodgy dossier”. I intend to post. something on that later but the reader should note that the steps taken by Blair in the run up to the Iraq war, were securitisation moves. It was, ultimately, successful in that he got his war but, while the parliamentary audience approved the war, the public did not. As it turned out, there were no WMDs at all! A ‘constructed threat’ by Blair and his ‘speech acts’ to an audience composed of the UK Parliament and the wider public. The public were not on his side (although, to a degree, accepted Saddam was a ‘bad man’) and Blair’s and the Parliament’s ignorance of the public in this securitisation, led to Blair being depised and called a war criminal.
Echoes, then, of today. Yes, overall, today’s public appear to support the securitisation of Covid 19 (if we believe what we hear, read and see in media) but the public are losing faith and patience as more and more are waking up to the totalitarian regime, or structure, which is being put in place with Covid as the excuse. Again, ‘we’ accepted the fundamental: There were WMDs – sorry, I mean “Covid 19”. That acceptance is all they need. You can debate vaccines and who gets them and masks and social distancing etc etc etc all you wish but the sheer fact you’ve accepted there is a real virus is all they need.
Ok. Back to Barry:
Don’t simply assume Barry is just some old, retired LSE professor. You’d be seriously underestimating his influence. See here:
And here:
No need to watch the entire lectures. The above are just to demonstrate who he speaks to and if you wish to hear him speak on the New Global Order to a military audience, by all means do so.
But, to get right to the crux of this post:
Barry Buzan, together with Ole Weaver and Japp De Wild, is a “founding father” of securitisation theory. Do not be confused by the word “theory” in this case. Securitisation ‘theory’ simply describes the happenings, events, speech and reactions to those who wish to construct a threat (particularly an “existential threat”) and achieve ‘buy in’ to the reality of that threat by the audience being told it is a threat. In the case of Climate Change and Covid 19, the audience is us, the global population.
The referent object in the case of Covid, is the global population. The referent object in the case of climate change is not the earth itself but, really, the balance of life within the biosphere since, the story goes, if the seas rise, the ice caps melt, the temperature rises and there is an increase in infectious diseases (the latter coming to the fore in the ‘story’ just over the recent decade) then animals, plants and human life are all at risk. That is the ‘story’.
So Barry knows all of this. He understands that the construction of any threat to be securitised need not be a real threat at all. However Barry and his crowd of academics (and students) have bought into the climate change/sustainability agenda hook, line and sinker. Therefore, to raise the idea that Covid is simply the climate catalyst to Barry and his ‘army’, is akin to heresy. They cannot acknowledge this because they want the results (i.e. significantly increased momentum of the climate agenda) of what Covid has provided.
So, because of his own philosophy and politics and people who share such views, even if they know or suspect that Covid is fake and has been constructed as a threat while being no threat at all, they must hold the idea that it is, in fact, real because it entirely supports their climate change agenda and their wishes. It is similar with Dr Colin Alexander, whom I previously posted about. His University (just like Barry’s and Imperial College and most, if not all, others) support and promote the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals). To support them, they have to justify that support. The justification is we have the threat of global warming/climate change. For someone like me to come along and say the threat is fake and has been catalysed by another fake called Covid, is anathema to them. Acknowledgement of my ‘thesis’, or even consideration of it, would have these people jumping through hoops to try and support their theses and discount my thesis at the same time.
So, here we have Barry making some points on climate change at an ‘event’ hosted at the LSE last week and which I ‘attended’ by Zoom. He can’t see the wood for the trees! I ask a question but they dare not ‘table’ it….
LSE Event video: https://odysee.com/@Earthling:5/buzan:4?r=Ca93BhvPPjvSC6LxPus5591n3dKrfYAf
Imperative you listen to it all but note at 10.19: “Preferably involving the deaths of a lot of rich people”.
If you or I were to write this on a post on. twitter or facebook/instagram etc, what do you think the outcome might be? But a lefty academic, paid by these rich people (indirectly he is) because he is promoting the right causes, can come right out and say it. However, let’s hear the names Barry. Let’s hear the names in your head. You sickening, delusional old bastard.
“Darling, there’s an elephant in our front lounge!”
Barry: “Oh don’t be such a Conspiracy theorist dear!”
“You’re one to talk! Jabbering on about non existent threats!”
Barry’s controlled by his own self importance and by the wish to maintain his ‘tenure’ and gravitas within the world of academia and he knows that, while he will speak, objectively, about securitisation and that there need be no real ‘threat’ involved, he dare not speak subjectively about that securitisation process being applied to his pet ‘love’ of Sustainability and climate change or of Covid 19 and demonstrating that the ‘threats’ in these two instances are fraudulently constructed. He would never get his paid invites back to the LSE, to the Middle East and to speak to the Norwegian military. Barry would be a ‘nobody’ once again and be demonised and cast adrift from the very life he has become accustomed to.
Barry, it turns out, is exceptionally stupid after all, however. While he fantasises about the rich being killed by “Climate Change”, he refuses to recognise the obvious: The people promoting his “Climate Change” are comprised of the richest capitalists on the planet! Silly Barry!
They do say socialists are just dumb communists after all!
And that, your Majesty, is why the LSE never saw the 2008 crash coming! They can’t see their own theories in practice!
Don’t be like Barry! Barry’s a useful idiot!
Academia’s full of them: Neil Ferguson, Barry Buzan and Colin Alexander. So far up their own arseholes they swallow their own bullshit.
But while Barry will speak in abstract terms about Securitisation, he will never say “There it is!” I wonder why?
Earthling 
2 comments