GBNews and Mark Sharman talk securitisation and don’t even know it!
The Media didn’t “buy in” to the propaganda. They were told! “Shut up!”
But GBNews and Mark Sharman won’t dare take you where it needs to be taken even if they aren’t clueless regarding securitisation. Interesting that Mark uses the term “Lockstep”. “Something more sinister…”? You’re damned right!
Give Mark his due though. He’s being somewhat brave in what he’s saying.
Global Shapers hub
Just a quick one.
Check out your local city “Global Shapers hub” for the World Economic Forum. For example, this is Edinburgh’s….
I’d propose there’s not a hell of a lot of Scots in that membership. I wonder why? Also, they’ve shaped nothing for themselves so far so I’m worried about what shape the world will be once they’ve shaped that!
Flat perhaps? 😉
“Ah Love! could thou and I with Fate conspire
To grasp this sorry Scheme of Things entire,
Would not we shatter it to bits — and then
Re-mould it nearer to the Heart’s Desire!”
“We are becoming increasingly aware that solutions to our global challenges must purposefully engage youth, at all levels – locally, regionally, nationally and globally. This generation has the passion, dynamism and entrepreneurial spirit to shape the future” — Prof. Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum
For some reason, this video has not been added to her youtube channel but, just as she has found all of the connections of these ‘children’ in her Ottawa hub (some of which aren’t children but those who are, you have to ask how they could possibly have the experience to hold some of these positions. They don’t, of course but that is what makes them useful.) I thought I’d check out one or two of our Edinburgh “creme de la creme”. Turns out, it’s not cream but shit and shit floats.
WEF Global Shapers: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ITnsR6owKmtQ/
Get them while they’re young, malleable and their egos are easily massaged. Make them feel special and tell them they’re changing the world (which, indeed, they are). DON’T tell them they’re changing it for the worse and that it will (and is) negatively impact their entire lives to such an extent that their useful idiocy and inexperience and naivety of the world and the people in it, will result in a dystopia, being fed to them as a Utopia, where, once they’ve provided their usefulness, they will have built their own prison.
Children are so magnetised by celebrity, wealth and power that old Uncle Klaus will be seen as Santa Klaus.
Don’t think there’s any getting through to this cohort of kids, however. They’re already gone. You can’t make a Global Shaper shape-shift, after all! What it needs is a counter-balance of a similarly aged group. But through what vehicle? And where does the funding for it come from? Also, those who are not interested in the narcissistic power and the wish to influence others, tend not to create organisations like this. That is why we’re in for a difficult century.
Here’s Florian (just for example):
A 24 year old, gay little ‘flower’ who loves dystopian video games and who the WEF will utilise very well to influence your children into loving the new World Order https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p08mq4t2
Another “Actor” (I put it in inverted commas for obvious reasons once you see the following):
He’s also been in the cast in theatre plays with the oddest of subject matter. You’d think these kids want their dystopia more than life!
While, if we look at his LinkedIn profile, we see this sort of thing:
Now, here’s the thing. He’s an LGBTQ social activist and that’s it. “Freelance marketing” (PR Crisis Management). What kind of bloody ‘crisis’ could this little gay bloke manage? A ‘crisis actor’ fits him to a T! Let’s look a little further…
There’s an example of the ego massage for you.
Does Poetry and activism pay well these days? If you can make head or tail of this ‘CV’ then you’re smarter than i am! In my world, if you’ve had 6 or 7 jobs in the last 8 years, corporates wouldn’t touch you with a barge pole – but the world Economic Forum will which, ironically, is packed to the rafters with corporates.
And then we have this….
Another example of the ego massage for you. He’d be in his bed that night stroking himself thinking of Alexander’s bellend!
Not only is Alexander Van Der Bellend the President of Austria but also a “centrist liberal” and ‘greeny'(i.e. communist) in his words and an “ex” (you’re never an “ex”) Freemason.
The “Curator” no less (basically “President”) of the Edinburgh branch of a group of well groomed (in more ways than one) narcissistic youth who want/need to feel they’re important.
And people wonder how there can be a conspiracy to remould the world. People tend to think ‘conspiracy’ is all done clandestinely, in secret, covertly etc. Not at all. It’s promulgated in the cold light of day by a ‘web’ (or network) of some well meaning people who are desperate for meaning in their own lives, who are ‘deputised’ by the most dirty, nasty scoundrels on planet earth who can brainwash them so easily by feeding their egos.
Did Florian suck Klaus Schwab’s dick? Who knows?
Let’s check out the Deputy: Peter MacPhail.
Peter took a Bachelor’s degree at Edinburgh University between 2013 and 2017, yet like a few in Polly’s video, went on to do what, exactly? Not architecture. Very odd. 4 years is quite an investment in a subject and one would think that his “Aspen Partnerships” would be in the field of architecture or similar. But no.
In fact, “Aspen Partnerships”, composed of two people including Peter, could not even be considered a real company with Peter as “Managing Director” in all seriousness because it is part of a global franchise of sorts while Peter, as you will see below, doesn’t even have an income generated from it – unless he lives on pocket change. Whereas, if he entered architecture, you can make good money in that field. For 4 years, he has been Managing Director of his ‘own company’ with, we must assume, no other employment which he shows and he hasn’t made a cent. How very very odd! A rather bare website for it too (but interesting).
“Aspen Partnerships” is all about connecting sustainable cooking technology manufacturers and distributors connect between the UK and India. Huh? Plus: “Our thoughts on the social, political and regulatory nuances that affect cross-border sustainable technology collaboration.” A kid who took an architecture degree has the ‘inside track’ on social and political/regulatory nuances that affect cross-border collaboration (of any kind)? Very very very odd!
So here’s the “ask” re Peter:
Where’s his income coming from? It isn’t Aspen. He leaves University and, in March 2018, he incorporates a company (although he states he has been MD since sept 2017, 6 months before the company existed) which, until today, hasn’t created a cent, essentially. In January of 2018, however, he had become a WEF Global Shaper (Looks like someone whispered “Get yourself a company Peter. It looks better if you’re going to be a “Global Shaper””). Of course, being involved in “Climate Reality” is a given now, isn’t it?
Who’s bankrolling these people? He’s 28 for god’s sakes! Is it a question of “Who’s yer daddy, Peter?” Or has Uncle Klaus come to town?
All of these people keep reminding me over the years of the following…..
The bastard is “seeding” the story.
For years, I have said to people – when they have suggested their fear of nuclear war – that it would never happen because these “elites” do not want to destroy their entire infrastructure and have to rebuild (and with who left to rebuild?) plus have a nuclear wasteland they’d have to live in too.
I have, however, stated that they would/could use chemical/bio weapons for the purposes of reducing population. No impact on their infrastructure. Just millions (or billions) of bodies to dispose of.
Trust me when I tell you that this man is putting this story out there as a cover for a potential false flag. If your senses are working well and you watch/listen carefully, you can see that that is what he is doing. He’s planting the seed so that the west can blame Putin when they know Putin has raised the issue of the US Bioweapon labs.
This man (and so many others) are literal genocidal maniacs intent on reducing the earth’s population!
The problem is, the ignorant and unread simply refuse to believe it!
Link to article: https://churchandstate.org.uk/2016/03/mayor-of-london-global-overpopulation-is-the-real-issue/
Read from 2013: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/william-hague-british-government-have-the-power-to-use-chemical-weapons-on-public/
The Americans have planned before to use chemical weapons and blame it on the enemy. Our UK and American and Western powers who have destroyed your livelihood and continue to under the “green” umbrella, are not above using chemical or biological weapons and propagandising us to believe we have been attacked by an outside enemy.
And the bastards would get away with it due to the wilful ignorance of the vast mass of cretins who roam this earth. “Now take your booster!” asshole!
Just think of the chemical weapons as a ‘blanket coverage’ Covid 19 vaccine!
Nazis, Communists and Climate
A complete waste of bloody time but felt the compulsion to say it in the comments anyway:
Can you be open minded enough to appreciate there may be well adjusted, well read, intelligent people in Britain who actually do not agree with you that we don’t want “Nazis”, without assuming we must be “Nazis” ourselves? Can you also be open minded enough to consider what is going on with the climate change policies affecting people’s liberties, distribution and supply chains, food scarcity, substantial fuel increases. etc etc and consider that this “war” (a real war but, at the same time, staged) is just another step in achieving global/UN/Western climate goals and SDGs? Can you appreciate that while Trudeau envies the Chinese system and WEF and our Monarchy are creating a “Great Reset” (and, through Covid, kicked it off and used war-like language – because it, that is Covid and climate change, are a replacement for an actual global war) to introduce a form of global communism, where the lines are drawn between the elite and the rest of humanity, this is all perpetrated by the side who WON WW2 and NOT perpetrated by so called “Nazis”?
Why is it that people tend to ignore this fact? That the side (“our” side) fighting for ‘democracy and freedom’, end up being those who creates a global authoritarianism yet we continue to bleat about “Nazis”? Do you understand that Hitler did not (and never did) want a war with Britain OR America? Do you understand he simply wished to reunite Germany and the germans who were being treated badly (just as the Ukrainian govt are to the Donbass/Eastern Russian speaking Ukrainians) in Poland and Czechoslovakia while he understood the CORPORATE “plundering” of democracies (just as you stated in this video) and wanted to release Germany (and did, brilliantly) from their clutches while he also understood the threat from Soviet/communist Russia. He expected (and wanted) the west to support him but then Churchill was brought in (bought and paid for by a certain group of people who wanted and declared war against him).
The west then, due to the same corporate and financial wealth actually got Soviet Russia to fight WITH the west against a western nation!! Soviet Russia (the government) was heavily composed of bolsheviks who were of the same ‘tribe’ as the UK and American group who wanted Germany destroyed because Germany was not going to play the ‘western’ corporate/financial game that the UN and IMF etc are doing today on behalf of these same people/tribe.
We have been brainwashed to believe the “bad Nazi” story (and this re-education is documented in our British Parliament archives just after the war) just as we have been propagandised today – as you point out – regarding “bad Putin” and “bad Gaddafi” etc. So everyone has this fear of even having the conversation, sensibly, that, during and after WW2, we were propagandised into our belief surrounding the “Nazis’ One last thing: Zelensky’s a jew and yet he has a “Nazi” battalion? Come on!! Surely this has eyebrows raised? Also, he speaks by zoom to the British parliament and the place is packed to the rafters as he uses CHURCHILL style language! Can’t you see when you’re being ‘had’? He’s using that same language because, with a few small differences, the same people are calling the shots in the same way. Also, this “war” is on US (the global population) not just Ukraine. This is to (along with Covid and climate/SDGs) destroy both, the european and global economy plus democracy as a whole.
The Club of Rome, in their book “The first global revolution” make the following statement (from a poem by Omar Khayyam):
“Ah Love! could thou and I with Fate conspire
To grasp this sorry Scheme of Things entire,
Would not we shatter it to bits
and then Re-mould it nearer to the Heart’s Desire!”
The “shattering to bits” is happening as we watch (Covid, Climate policy and Ukraine) destroying the world’s economy and democracy. The “remoulding” is “Build Back Better”. In the same book (and this is a group – The Club of Rome – supported by Princes Philip, Charles and his boys plus the UN and WEF who are following the plan) they say the following:
“The common enemy of humanity is man, so democracy may not be well suited to the tasks ahead. However, the threat of pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famine can be used to fulfill humanity’s need for a common adversary.”
“Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organise everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely, sacrilegious though this may sound. In its present form, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time. Few politicians in office are sufficiently aware of the global nature of the problems facing them and little, if any, awareness of the interactions between the problems. Generally speaking, informed discussion on the main political, economic and social issues take place on radio and television rather than in Parliament, to the detriment of the latter. The activities of political parties are so intensely focussed on election deadlines and party rivalries that they end up weakening the democracy they are supposed to serve This confrontational approach gives an impression that party needs come before national interest. Strategies and tactics seem more important than objectives and often a constituency is neglected as soon as it is gained. With the current mode of operation. Western democracies are seeing their formal role decline and public opinion drifting away from elected representatives”. page 71-72
Similarly, there is this quote in the article:
Further: “It would seem that humans need a common motivation…either a real one or else one invented for the purpose….In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
It’s all there. The problem is – just as you say – nobody reads further than a MSM headline!
Taken half an hour to write this. It’ll be a complete waste of bloody time!
Who wanted the west to fight for them in 1939? Who talked Churchill into the war then promised him they’d get Roosevelt in too? Was it not the same people from which this guy derives? YES IT BLOODY WELL WAS!
“WE WILL FIGHT THEM ON THE BEACHES!”
Zelensky, I’m no Putin fan but neither am I yours or the British Parliament pigs but I can assure you of this: The West couldn’t give a rat’s arse about you or your country and people EXCEPT from the perspective of gaining political and economic objectives. I doubt you give a rat’s arse either. Those of us. who may care for human life, people like you, Putin and the British Parliament (and the US congress) have no interest in listening to just as they had and have no interest in listening to us re Covid or Climate. This war is against us, not you and your parliamentary and corporate/financial colleagues.
I also doubt you’ve killed 10,000 Russians but that’s another story.
“Humans and Beasts”eh? No. You have a choice: It’s either human v. human or beast v. beast. Unless, of course, you’re adopting a talmudic viewpoint?
You’re no “hero” dude. You’re just a jewish comedian who’s a useful little lackey at this point. Your jewish buddies will herald you as a hero though. You’ll probably get a Nobel Prize at the end of all of this. Your lot usually do!
UKRAINE: Whose side are you on?
A map:
Another map:
A coincidence?
Who/What were the Khazarians?
Putin and Chabad…
First jewish President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Chabad….
Trump and Chabad…
The self proclaimed Zionist, Biden and…?….Yes, you guessed it!
So, what is the common denominator? And who’s side are you on?
Just so it’s clear as day, both sides in this conflict are controlled by jews, and both sides are labelling each other Nazis.
They want us to think that we have to pick a side in whatever conflict they start, but every side they offer us is jewish.
We must stop our enemies before they cause even more death and destruction, and potentially usher in a new world war, which would be the nail in the coffin of the White race. We can only do this by unifying the White people, and actually all good people of the world, against our common enemy.
I do not support Zelensky. I do not support Putin. I do not support Biden, nor Trump. I am against ZOG. I am for the good people of whatever countries are being terrorised by these talmudic tyrants.
Who will end up being the victims of the wars these leaders start? The “goyim” who just wish to live in peace in their own land. This is what they want to see destroyed.
What’s that on Ukrainian currency?
Do you really think this guy sounds sincere?
Let’s consider the UN Security Council’s entire raison d’etre:
The Security Council has primary responsibility, under the United Nations Charter, for the maintenance of international peace and security. It is for the Security Council to determine when and where a UN peace operation should be deployed.
Its functions include:
to recommend the admission of new Members;
to investigate any dispute or situation which might lead to international friction;
to recommend to the General Assembly the appointment of the Secretary-General and, together with the Assembly, to elect the Judges of the International Court of Justice.
Now, who are the permanent members? UK, USA, RUSSIA, FRANCE and CHINA.
Doing a pretty inept job, ostensibly, isn’t it? 
Any ideas as to why that would be?
Do you remember the Cold War? While American and Russian scientists/astronauts collaborated on Apollo/Soyuz missions?
Do you remember Covid 19? While American, Russian, Chinese, British and every other country in the world told their populations a story about a scary pathogen?
The key dilemma facing western leaders trying to draw up a sanctions package against Moscow is, at heart, a simple one: the more effective sanctions are in damaging the Russian economy, the more potential damage they could do to western economies in the process.
This is Moscow’s area of greatest vulnerability. Its energy exports are worth about $240 billion annually, or 15 per cent of Russia’s GDP, and their value has risen in part as a result of the global instability President Putin has caused.
Yet because of Europe’s reliance on Russian gas and oil, there is absolutely no appetite in western capitals to contemplate sanctions that would imperil this supply. Currently Russia provides more than 40 per cent of Europe’s natural gas supply.
So: Who does this war hit hardest? Forget countries and governments, it’s us and our entire cost of living and resource base.
This war does nothing but target the real enemy in the “Covid/Climate War”:
US.
“Clowns” to the left of me, “Jokers” to the right… Here I am, stuck in the middle of jews.
HUFFINGTON POST 2015 – TRUDEAU DICTATORSHIP
HUFFINGTON POST 2015:
Why Canada Will Become a Dictatorship Under Trudeau
The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let’s hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.
By
Daniel Dickin, Contributor
Community activist, author, conservative
12/12/2014 12:59pm EST | Updated February 11, 2015
Originally published in the Prince Arthur Herald
It’s becoming clearer as the days of Trudeau’s Liberals wear on: if elected Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau would turn Canada into a dictatorship.
https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/trudeau-dictator_b_6314494
This is the man who admitted he “admires China’s basic dictatorship.” It wasn’t just a sarcastic comment – he seriously said that he admires the dictatorship because they can get things done quickly.
And it’s becoming clearer that Trudeau not only admires the dictatorship — he runs the Liberal Party like one too.
How else can one explain the police-enforced acclamation of Andrew Leslie as the Liberal candidate for Orleans? Even with hundreds of Liberals attending the meeting to show their support for another candidate (and former Trudeau leadership rival), it was clear from the beginning that Leslie was Trudeau’s hand-picked favourite, and certainly wouldn’t be stopped by pesky processes like “democracy.”
Just the imagery of Trudeau’s chosen candidate being selected with police intervention is scary. It shows that Trudeau doesn’t just admire China’s dictatorship — he would practice one if he had the chance.
The nomination in Orleans is only the latest rigged “open nomination.” Despite Trudeau’s promises to actually, you know, practice democracy, at least a half dozen Liberal nominations have been rigged or tampered with through the direct intervention of Trudeau’s office: mysteriously disqualifying candidates, changing nomination dates, paperwork going “missing,” and using dirty “back-room” politics to ensure the leader’s candidate is chosen at any cost.
But those are only Liberal candidates; surely Trudeau would loosen his grip on his caucus colleagues once they’ve been elected, wouldn’t he? Unfortunately, no. The Liberal caucus randomly learned one morning early last year that their leader had come up with a new diktat: that all Liberals would be expected, no, required, to vote pro-choice. When Trudeau’s pathetic attempted defence (that they were “the party of the Charter,” obviously missing those small sections about freedom of conscience and religion) agitated more than a few Liberal MPs, he attempted to invent some weird “grandfathering” rule. But then he went back on that too.
The result is that Liberal MPs who dare question the diktat of Trudeau are being punished. Those who dare disagree have already been punished, resigned, or indicated that they won’t seek another term in office — at least not under the iron fist of Trudeau.
Or we can look to the expulsion of those kinda-sorta-maybe “Senate Liberals,” who were unilaterally expelled (but not really) by Trudeau without the slightest consultation with the Senate Liberal leadership.
The Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau has become a dictatorship. The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him.
Now that we know that Trudeau runs his party like a dictatorship, we must ask ourselves: is there any indication he wouldn’t do the same as the leader of Canada?
Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision?
Let’s hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.
Although, never forget this: He couldn’t be without the Queen’s consent.
THE EPIDEMIC THAT NEVER WAS (VIDEO)
The video includes Candace Owens from her Instagram talking about the “CDC vs CDC” statistics regarding rubella in the 1960s. It then summarises securitisation once more.
Due to Youtube cancelling my channel, I’m only uploading, now, on Bitchute, for now until something else comes along. I can start another youtube channel (and, in fact, have) but I haven’t uploaded anything to it since I am still deciding how to use it and how I can possibly say things without the youtube algorithm (or persons not liking what I say) cancelling me again. It takes hours and sometimes days to produce a video. I’m not Alex Belfield or Carl Vernon (who tell you bugger all).
Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/KUEYRo37RrvA/
Bill’s securitisation conference
What have I been harping on about for nearly 2 years?
SECURITISATION.
Where’s Bill?
Munich Security Conference.
Have you ever just got to a point where you give up trying to get through to people? They just don’t listen and so you say “Fuck it!”
In this video, you can hear how he speaks of the success (or lack of) of the “Speech Acts” given by the politicians (he realises they are not trusted and so the securitisation move would be less accepted). He then mentions Fauci and the CDC and what he is doing is, publicly, stating outright the now recognised (by him) pros and cons of using different sets of people to broadcast the narrative to the “audience” (you and I).
Next, you have this. This is a beauty. But before listening, appreciate this quote from Dorothy L. Sayers:
“The great advantage about telling the truth is that nobody ever believes it.”
Listen to the psycho…. Listen as he tells you the truth under the guise of it being ‘madness’ if you think it’s true.
And to top it off, he goes back to the “primary messages” of Fauci, saying he didn’t think Fauci confused anyone with them. Fauci, then, being his ‘star’ Securitisation Actor.
Again, I repeat:
And if you do not know who Chatham House are, or alternatively, its full, formal title: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, then I suggest you research it as it is the premier (the CFR’s ‘daddy’) Global Think Tank. So, if you wish to dismiss that statement, above, you are a blithering bloody idiot!
To boldly not go where no man has gone before
GB News – whatever news you choose – speaks out against the tyranny of Trudeau (while they say far less about Ardern and Morrison and Sturgeon and, yes, even Johnson).
And WHO is the Canadian Head of State? You choose to entirely ignore that! And you always will. You will never get to the bottom of all of this until you look in the direction you are too afraid to.
EVERYONE does ignore it. Not to do so would cause absolute chaos, worldwide BUT it needs to be done otherwise all the rhetoric in the world against these petty “leaders” (lackeys) will achieve nothing.
I know that, while I repeat this to the day I die, it will not change. That said, the Queen will be on her deathbed soon and, if her son gets his (and her and his father’s before him) way, we are on a very very dark road.
However, the “Protocols” also want rid of the monarchy just as I do (I didn’t say I wanted rid of the Constitution based upon a monarchy but ‘the monarchy’ is simply an office) but those who wrote the protocols do not want to be rid of the monarchy(s) for the same reason I do. They want rid of them to install a tyranny in the fashion they want. Do the present monarchy and these people want the same tyranny? They both want one (and are progressing toward it) but the same? It’s complex while the answer may be yes or may be no. Difficult to assess.
However, make no mistake, while you see commonwealth countries like Canada, Australia and New Zealand falling into authoritarianism/dictatorship, they have one thing in common and that is their head of state. DON’T forever be the idiot who says the woman has no power. I can assure you, she has every power (her and her ‘Crown’).
Remember what Trudeau said: “You don’t wish to forfeit your trucks to the Crown now, do you?” Actually stated by one of his Police goons.
So, “Don’t go there” as long as you wish but, while that is your attitude and nobody “goes there”, there is no remedy. Your enemy (“you” being the entire commonwealth of nations PLUS the USA) is the Crown of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
Deal with it… or don’t!
England celebrates: What’s next?
What’s next? You had better wake the hell up! That’s “What’s next?”!
The British people – like most people across the world – have no clue. Celebrating with “We held the line. The narrative is crumbling. The restrictions are being lifted”.
Well, World War 1 ended. As did WW2, Vietnam, the Cold war, Afghanistan, Iraq, Thalidomide, DDT, 9/11, the dotcom crash, the credit default swap and mortgage and bank crash of 2007/2008 and now ‘Covid”. Events end, otherwise they wouldn’t be ‘events’, would they? The status quo isn’t an ‘event’. However, in endeavouring to achieve “peace in our time” the parasitical elite, their United Nations, NGOs, Public/ Private partnerships etc must create the events to – as they say – create ‘opportunity out of a crisis’ and Ordo Ab Chao (Order out of chaos).
Here’s the problem (or, at least, one of them): The British people and the wider global population, simply will never take onboard the idea that there is one, overarching conspiratorial agenda throughout all of these ‘events’. They have been taught (conditioned) by the very parasitical elite who wish to gain from it all, that to believe or even entertain “Conspiracy theory” makes you a kook! You should be locked up and psychoanalysed for your own good. WELL THEY WOULD SAY THAT, WOULDN’T THEY?
They’re not letting go and they never will. They can produce anything they want at any time they want while people continue to refuse to see it AND those who do see it continue to think beating Covid mandates is all that’s needed.
They’re at war – against YOU!
They CAN’T let go because this is a war until, at the very least 2030 and, in depopulation terms to 2050 and beyond. They NEED the “virus”.
Meanwhile, they’re attacking you from every angle. Fuel, food, disease, mobility, division. It’s a psycho war and you’re losing. You always will until everyone understands the full game being played.
It’s the “Climate” Wars.
But you won’t read, will you? It’s just too long and boring (and it just can’t be true!)…..
It’s all laid out for you. It’s just down to what you choose to believe no matter what is laid out in front of you: https://earthlinggb.wordpress.com/2021/11/17/the-nexus-a-full-explanation-of-the-construction-of-covid/
It is very very simple: There is a class which wants rid of your class. Nothing more difficult to understand than that! They’ll achieve it too, simply because you refuse to recognise and accept it.
“The Omicron variant did not come from the Delta variant. It came from a completely different part of the virus’s family tree. And since we don’t know where in the virus’s family tree a new variant is going to come from, we cannot know how pathogenic it might be.
Prof Mark Woolhouse, of Edinburgh University
Mark Woolhouse: Knows nothing. That’s why his quote means nothing and informs you of nothing. The “Omicron variant” came from no part of a tree which doesn’t exist! Never isolated as SARS-COV-2 itself wasn’t. A PCR test that diagnoses nothing. Woolhouse is an epidemiologist on par with the ‘great’ Neil Ferguson.
Woolhouse is professor of infectious disease epidemiology at the Usher Institute in the University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine.
Woolhouse is a fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and of the Academy of Medical Sciences. He was appointed a member of the Order of the British Empire in the 2002 New Year Honours for services to the control of infectious diseases.
COVID-19
In April 2020 Woolhouse was criticised after it emerged he had travelled to a second home on the Island of Lismore hours before lockdown ruled were announced.
Despite public health advice for those not normally resident on islands to return home, Woolhouse angered residents and remained there for a number of months. (Rules for thee… again!)
On 19 September 2020, when the UK faced an introduction of “COVID marshals” and an increase in the number of reported cases of COVID-19 that some like Chris Whitty had termed a “second wave”, Woolhouse instead favoured a Swedish-style model and “learn to live with COVID.”
Learned to ‘live with Covid’ in September 2020 (he was a bit quick wasn’t he?) because 1. It suited him and 2. He knows it’s bullshit.
Personal life
He is married to Francisca Mutapi, a professor in Professor in Global Health Infection and Immunity. Together they have one daughter.
And Nicola Sturgeon is FULLY onboard! Why she is retaining the lockdown powers!
Canadian Truckers are Terrorists!
The Canadian Trucker freedom convoy has now moved into a new, deadly, chapter.
President Trudeau has now categorised the truckers as a category 1 terrorist group.
While some Canadians are traumatised by the incessant blaring of horns because it means when they walk the streets in Ottawa, they can’t hear a sneeze even from a few yards away, the RCMP have collated data which appears to show that the truckers have adapted their horns to blast “covid” all across the city by pouring vials of Pfizer vaccine into their horns. A dastardly plot!
President Trudeau has called for a State of Emergency adding the Trucker terrorists have deployed “Weapons of Mass Sternutation”.
Come on! That was funny! You couldn’t make this shit up! A bunch of delivery truck drivers who normally drop off parcels at depots and a few farmers create a “State of Emergency”. I’m howling here!
A Pseudo-Pandemic Device
The following is taken from the Mindanao Gold Star Daily Newspaper, 14th July 2020.
By Jude Josue L. Sabio .
THE currently used RT PCR test purportedly to massively detect the viral infection from the Sars-Cov 2 only leads to an illusion of a pseudo-pandemic, because it is just a “manufacturing technique” not meant to detect a viral infection, which could lead to a massive false test.
Tommy Morisson fell victim to an HIV false test in 1996. A celebrity American heavyweight boxing champ, he tested positive for HIV at the prime of his boxing career. As a result of the test believed then to be true, his boxing career was abruptly ended. But in 2007, he underwent two HIV tests, one of which was for the New York Times. The tests showed he did not have HIV. In 2013, he died at the age of 44. Based on an autopsy, it was found that he had no HIV, which was consistent with the antemortem examination done a few days before he died. After his death, his wife relentlessly sought to clear his name from the stigma of HIV, not to mention the painful effects it spawned, by filing a civil lawsuit against the Nevada sports commission and Quest Diagnostics that made the 1996 HIV test. In the case files, it has come to light that the Quest Diagnostics has admitted that its 1996 HIV test does not detect the HIV viral infection. The celebrated dispute is still raging to date.
Even a hospital itself did not escape the false test. A pseudo-epidemic incident at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in the USA is documented in the New York Times article entitled “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t” written by Gina Kolata and published 22 January 2007. As narrated in the article, the medical center was caught in what was then believed to be an epidemic of “whooping cough” which is caused by the bacterium Bordetella Pertussis. Its health workers contracted a respiratory sickness exhibiting symptoms of “whooping cough”. Concerned that patients in the hospital might be infected, the hospital conducted a quick PCR test that turned out to be positive for “whooping cough”. An epidemic was believed to have occurred in the hospital. The health workers were given antibiotics and vaccines. This belief turned out to be a false alarm when efforts were made to conduct a definitive test by growing the supposed bacterium in the lab. But they were not able to grow the bacterium, because it did not exist in the first place. It was not a “whooping cough” epidemic, but just a respiratory illness associated with the common cold. The hospital called the incident a “pseudo-pandemic”.
The Morisson false HIV positive test and the Dartmouth pseudo-epidemic illustrate how a purported quick PCR test could lead to a false result and its adverse impact. In the case of Morisson, it destroyed his boxing career at the time of his prime when he was supposed to fight Mike Tyson in the ring. The false PCR test in the Dartmouth hospital resulted in a false belief in an epidemic leading to medical interventions that should have been proper only when there is really an epidemic.
One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears
The Morisson case is highly notable, because it is very much celebrated involving, as it does, a celebrity boxing icon, and it has spawned a protracted legal battle that has partially reached the US Federal Supreme Court in 2018 on certain legal aspects. More than that, it stands out, because it happened in the context of the raging debate on whether or not HIV is the cause of Aids.
This HIV medical war has something to do with the RT PCR test that is the current method used in the mass testing of covid-19. The RT PCR test came into popular use in 1990, or before the 1996 HIV test of Tommy Morisson. At that time, the HIV retrovirus was not highly detectable; but with the advent of the PCR invented by Kary Mullis that earned him a Nobel Prize in 1993, test manufacturing companies weaponized the PCR and used it to prove that HIV is the cause of Aids.
Celia Farber was “in the rare position of having known, spent time with, and interviewed the inventor of the method used in the presently available Covid-19 tests, which is called PCR, (Polymerase Chain Reaction.)” As a journalist, she closely followed this epic battle. “One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears”, said Celia Farber referring to Kary Mullis in her article “Was the Covid-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus” dated 7 April 2020.
In said article, Mr. Farber referred to an email made by Karl Mullis on 7 May 2013 to the widow of Tommy Morisson. The email states: “PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment.“ To this, Ms. Farber remarks: “If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test”.
“PCR is a needle in a haystack technology that can be extremely misleading in “the diagnosis of infectious diseases.” The first conflict between this revolutionary technology and human life happened on the battlefield of AIDS, and Mullis himself came to the front line arguing against PCR as a diagnostic tool”, said Mr. Farber in her article.
Dr. Rasnick gave a piece of advice for people who want to be tested for Covid-19: “Don’t do it, I say when people ask me, No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable”
From her two-hour interview with David Crowe, a Canadian researcher, with a degree in biology and mathematics, host of The Infectious Myth podcast, and President of the think-tank Rethinking Aids, Ms. Farber stated in her same article that David Crowe “broke down the problems with the PCR based Corona test in great detail, revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery.”
We might think that Tommy Morisson and the Dartmouth false alarm are isolated cases of a quick test hoax. But in his 2-hour interview with Ms. Farber, David Crowe made an intriguing reference to a Chinese study concluding that the PCR test produces false-positive results at the huge rate of 80% in an asymptomatic population.
I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.
David Crowe said: “There was a famous Chinese paper that estimated that if you’re testing asymptomatic people, up to 80% of positives could be false positive. That was kind of shocking, so shocking that PubMed had to withdraw the abstract even though the Chinese paper appears to still be published and available. I actually have a translation with a friend. I translated it into English and it’s a really, standard calculation of what they call positive predictive value. The abstract basically said that in asymptomatic populations, the chance of a positive coronavirus test being a true positive is only about 20%. 80% will be false positive.”
Ms. Farber also interviewed Dr. David Rasnick, a bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics who said: “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”
PCR for diagnosis is a big problem. When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives.
Dr. Rasnick gave a piece of advice for people who want to be tested for Covid-19: “Don’t do it, I say when people ask me, No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable”
In their exchanges, Dave Rasnick concurs with David Crowe, saying: “To my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.” This comment has something to do with the absence of a “gold standard” in proving the existence of the Sars-Cov 2, which is its purification or separation from everything else and visualizing it. He further said: “PCR for diagnosis is a big problem. When you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it’s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.”
Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused.
Ms. Farber reported that Kary Mullis died last year at the age of 74, and could not be around to denounce the use of his invention as a diagnostic tool for the detection of a viral infection called covid-19 in the same way that he had shed tears in 1994 concerning the HIV. When asked by Ms. Farber about what the late Kary Mullis would say about this explosion of PCR insanity, Mr. Crowe said: “I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique”, “Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”
I venture to say that Karl Mullis must be turning and weeping in his grave knowing that his PCR invention has been turned into a monstrous instrument of deception to manufacture massive false tests in support of a Covid-19 pseudo-pandemic.
Original text: https://mindanaogoldstardaily.com/a-pseudo-pandemic-device/
All he needs is an “event”.
So, our ‘esteemed’ leader has dropped vaccine passports and face masks. Yippideedoodah!
So far the NHS workers are still going to lose their jobs if not vaccinated (while people like Fauci state that Omicron could well be a natural immunisation and herd immunity) and we still have a world where the unvaxxed still cannot travel abroad YET we have idiots like Mahyar Tousi and Alex Belfield telling their audiences that we are back to freedom (or just about). It should be noted that both of these gentlemen still subscribe to the left v right paradigm so it could be asked if their giggling positivity comes as a surprise? I don’t think so. It’s rather like Belfield’s total cognitive dissonance surrounding the royal family – he just doesn’t get it and will never accept his queen is in on it.
Over the past 24 hours or so, I’ve seen and heard from people saying “it’s as good as over”. I sincerely wish they were right – BUT THEY ARE NOT! There’s no telling them that however because you are labeled as ‘negative’. These people need to understand something (something I have stated over and over to many throughout the years) – When I was in my infancy within my chosen profession (Business Development), I learned from some very wise people I worked with that “the good aspects of an opportunity take care of themselves and there’s no need to dwell on them. What needs to be focused on and mitigated against are the potential pitfalls because that is where all the good can end up being for nothing if we haven’t, effectively, identified the potential issues with an opportunity (technically, operationally and/or financially)”. To take this view is the most positive thing you can do, in fact, because if something does crop up which could threaten the business and you have already planned for mitigation, then you’re in a position to deal with it.
So, I let the ‘good news’ look after itself and I concentrate on the potential (and real) negatives so as to alert and keep people from becoming complacent. “Covid” was and is never about a virus and a disease. One must remember this fundamental. So how can it be over when it was all about catalysing action and policies toward achieving goals in 2030 and through to 2050? It is NOT “over” by a long shot! Of course, if you thought it was all about a virus and still do, then I can’t help you. It is about carbon emissions and 50% reduction by 2030 and net zero by 2050 plus significant population reduction. The fact that vax and booster are required for global travel means there will be significantly less airline carbon emissions. The created inflation and the created supply chain issues will have similar effect. The changes in the NHS and medicine worldwide will drive down emissions and we will (and are) moving into an era of drastically reduced lifestyle and lower/middle class wealth in the west.
The move to renewables (catalysed by Covid) and the behaviour changes it has driven and continues to, reduction in real meat eating (I wonder why Boris’ “Operation red meat” was given such a name? I wonder indeed!), changes in alcohol production/consumption patterns and many additional behaviour changes, energy policy and various yet to be known new policies, are going to completely change the face of what we, today, know as ‘living’. Costs of driving fossil fuel based vehicles are going to skyrocket and there will be thousands, if not millions of people who will no longer be able to drive due to the cost of that and/or the costs in buying a new electric vehicle.
So, the point is: Today’s statement by Johnson is nothing to celebrate at all because the ‘virus’ has played its role to catalyse all of this and more.
As for an ‘event’: Johnson has made his statement. The country (that is those who do not understand the big game – which is the majority) are going to celebrate and think “it’s all over” and they are going to relax. There are going to be many who went on marches who will, now, no longer go because they think they’ve, essentially, won. The pressure may be off Johnson (may be) and he’s given the country the belief that he has our ‘freedoms’ in mind. He’s a ‘good guy’. He has had to backtrack due to the pressure and it makes him look good but that backtracking will not be what the ‘masters’ want or need but they may let him do it because they may have something else up their sleeve. What if, tomorrow, next week or, let’s say, before April, there is an ‘event’? What if that ‘event’ then necessitates a renewed and even more serious lockdown or actions we’ve never yet even anticipated? It doesn’t have to be a new variant or even a new virus (although it could be). It could be some other environmental disaster, for example. It could even be none of Boris’ doing or planning (although I hasten to add he’s fully onboard with the depopulation plan as his article in 2007 makes quite clear). If something did happen, he’d still be in office and would have to react to it as a leader would while being able to say “I was rolling it all back”.
Why do I suggest a possible ‘event’? Because, again, we have to reach goals by 2030 and 2050. A fake pandemic may have created conditions during 2020 to 2022 but that momentum has to not only maintain but but be increased upon. If we went back to pre 2020, those goals will not be met. Is it enough that policies have been catalysed and corporations and businesses are fully onboard? Maybe, but I don’t think so. The 50% emissions reduction by 2030 is an immense target.
Of course, it’s always possible that Boris is seen by his masters to have achieved what they needed and that he’s put out to pasture and a new leader is anointed, meanwhile Boris swans off to some highly paid bank or other organisation ala Tony Blair. If that occurs, then, still, in the foreseeable future, there will be other new disasters headed our way and they will get away with them because the populace still hasn’t grasped the big game.
The one thing that has ensured people get shot down off social media for is saying “Covid does not exist”. Anything else can be debated today (especially the red herring known as a lab leak and ‘gain of function’) but you cannot say “Covid does not exist”. Why? Because then you’re over the target.
It is precisely what happened after 9/11: You could argue and debate any aspect but, if you dared to say “there were no planes” (and there were not) then you were shot down EVEN by those who said they were 9/11 truthers!
There is no Covid.
There were no planes.
People have never been brave enough to embrace these two facts and, therefore, this game is still in play and will never end. We’re now on the “Climate Change” aspect of the game and, years ago, the scientists who came out and said it was claptrap were shut down just as the doctors, today, who say “there is no virus” are shut down. We never learn.
I am not suggesting the game isn’t over. I’m telling you it isn’t. While you may see that as negative, if you saw it my way and appreciated the need not to get complacent and to also acquire the knowledge you need of the big game from a wider and deeper perspective, that would be when the focus on the negative becomes the most positive thing you can do. If you don’t, this agenda is going to eat you and the rest of us. Come back in 10 years and say I was wrong. There are people who, 10 years ago, didn’t listen and have, over the course of the last few years, said “You were right”. So, I am telling you (100%) I am right again. By all means, ignore.
False Epidemic: Swine Flu
Yet, as you can read here, it is quoted as being part of some “paranoid conspiracy theory”.
But we never see the “education and transparency” Robert, now do we?
Meanwhile, as for your assertion that it is all “paranoid conspiracy” or created disinformation for the sake of a buck: What’s my story? I’ve never asked anyone for a cent over the past 12 years on this blog. I don’t trust many who do. If I wrote a book, that would be a different story although the time and energy I’ve put into this over the past 12 years or so, constitutes far more than a book (even though it has not been written with the professionalism needed for a book).
While, also, the Council of Europe – not exactly famed “conspiracy theorists”, I would submit – had this to say about the “Swine flu pandemic”:
Earthling 
leave a comment