YOU JUST WON’T BELIEVE THIS!
I was sent this video by a bud of mine. You just can’t make this shit up!
I’m always pretty wary of stuff being sent to me which is suggesting hidden meanings and translations etc but this just floors me. I’ve checked it (by all means check yourself) and it is absolutely correct. With the interchanging of just two letters in the same word, you either have “Charlie” or you have “Israel”.
So I checked an English – Hebrew and French – Hebrew translator to begin with and what I came up with was this:
Now, here, the Charlie and Israel hebrew lettering is not the same but look at the photo below of those holding the cards up in Jerusalem.
Hmmmm.. Just follow me here….
Je suis Charlie = I am Charlie
Je suit Charlie = I follow Charlie
Let’s just consider an anagram or two of “Charlie”:
I am Arch lie
Je suis La Reich!
Let’s look at the “Je suis Charlie’s” in Jerusalem:
Israelis, mostly French Jews, hold signs reading: Je suis Charlie; Israel is Charlie; and I am a Jew of France.
Photograph: Sebastian Scheiner/AP (from World News, The Guardian)
What we have here is:
“Je suis Charlie” (of course)
“I am a jew of France”
and in hebrew writing, we have “Israel IS Charlie”
Notice that the hebrew letters in “Charlie” and in “Israel” are exactly the same but just with the middle two letters swapped around (again, like an anagram of each other). Now THINK: WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF THAT BEING COINCIDENTAL?
Now Hebdo- a short form of the french “Hebdomaire”
From Latin hebdomadarius, from Latin hebdomas. Origin greek number 7 ( epta ) and ( omas ) group. group of seven. most common : group of seven days = evdomas = week.
hebdomadaire m (plural hebdomadaires)
So what do we have here?
“I AM ISRAEL”?
“I AM CHARLIE GROUP OF SEVEN”?
“I AM ISRAEL’S GROUP OF SEVEN”?
So here’s another couple of things to consider:
1. Check out all the hundreds of photos you can find from around the world of people, en masse, with these “Je suis Charlie” Card flyers (all of essentially the same design). Ask yourself this question: HOW (and who) designed, created/manufactured/printed all of these to ensure that it became equivalent to a BRAND design? HOW were these printed off in massive numbers? Everyone at home with their printers do you think? Well, for one thing, they are card more than they are paper and not too many people just have card waiting around to be printed off at home. Secondly, HOW did it sweep the world in a matter of a couple of days? People do NOT act in such a fashion in their millions EXCEPT when such rallies have been set up and planned by a well connected and financially supported group. It does NOT happen! Did it happen for Lee Rigby? Did it even happen throughout multiple countries for 9/11? NO!
With the dignitaries all ensuring they showed up at such short notice (as mentioned in a previous blog) and, added to that, substantial numbers of people across the world with their well framed photos showing “Charlie” signs, this has been planned well before the event. What I DO NOT mean is that all those people in the photos are part of it! They don’t have to be. But to have people ready to create the motivation for people to do this en masse all over the world is necessary and points very strongly to pre-knowledge this event was going to take place.
2. Our new Pope:
Je Suit Charlie!
Our new Pope is a jesuit. He has also been very vocal regarding the need for a New World Order. Also, the jesuits and the jews have VERY close links. I wonder why the Society of Jesus was essentially banned from having a Pope? Today, however, it is different and today, even the catholic/jesuit schools are introducing jewish studies into their curriculum.
From “Catholic Family News”
United Religions Back in the Spotlight
Pope Picked to Lead One-World Church
by Cornelia R. Ferreira
Isn’t it extraordinary how something long in existence can be suddenly re-proposed as a brilliant new idea? Politicians and educators, hoping we have memory problems, often do this to fool us into thinking they are working hard to improve a situation. Another audacious example of this strategy was recently provided by the Holy See’s support of a proposal for a “United Religions”.
The proposal came from former Israeli President and Nobel Peace Prize-winner Shimon Peres. At a private audience with Pope Francis this September 4th, Peres “proposed the founding of a United Religions organization — modelled after the United Nations — to fight terrorism”.
In an interview with the Catholic magazine Famiglia Cristiana, Peres said he wanted to establish an international body representing the world’s major religions, as “an unquestionable moral authority” able to intervene in conflicts, “a UN of religions”.
Like the UN Charter, he added, there should be a United Religions Charter. “The new Charter would state on behalf of all faiths that slitting people’s throats or carrying out mass slaughters … has nothing to do with religion”.
Furthermore, he said, Pope Francis would be the best leader for the United Religions Organization because “perhaps for the first time in history the Holy Father is a leader who’s respected, not just by a lot of people, but also by different religions and their representatives”.
Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi, SJ, indicated that Peres’ proposal was a new idea for Francis. “The pope listened, showing his interest, his attention and encouragement”. But, “the pope made no personal commitment,” telling Peres that the Pontifical Councils for Interreligious Dialogue and for Justice and Peace are the offices “suitable” for supporting or following such initiatives. Their presidents would “consider this proposal carefully,” said Fr. Lombardi.
The problem: Mr. Peres proposed something that has been running for fourteen years, promulgated by the UN itself, with a signed Charter, and with the same goals he’s promoting! The only difference is that the existing Charter does not mention beheadings or slaughters.
Pope Francis should have reminded him of this, especially since the UR is not a new idea for Francis. As Archbishop of Buenos Aires he invited its founder and head to an interfaith service in his cathedral to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the UR in Latin America. Furthermore, the Holy See has been aware of the United Religions from its conception, and has been working for its goals through its founding partners.
Do Peres and the Vatican have collective Alzheimer’s, or are they confident that most Catholics are ignorant/ suffering amnesia? The history of the United Religions illustrates the extent of their disingenuousness.
The United Religions is created
The Masonic one-world religion of the New World Order, in the making for over 150 years, materialized in June 1997 as the United Religions Organization. Chief partners in its establishment were Episcopal Bishop of California, William Swing; the Communist Gorbachev Foundation/USA (later The State of the World Forum); and the syncretic World Conference on Religion and Peace, now called Religions for Peace (RfP).
Bishop Swing is an anti-population and pro-homosexuality activist. He is a follower of the expelled Dominican and occultist, Matthew Fox, who became an Episcopalian minister under Swing.
Religions for Peace is an internationalist, occult UN Non-Govermental Organization headquartered at the United Nations in New York. It is an important “unofficial” Vatican channel for interreligious activities, said Francis Cardinal Arinze, former head of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue. It was co-founded in 1960 by John Cardinal Wright, and its first international president was Archbishop Angelo Fernandes of New Delhi. In 1994 it held the first-ever interfaith conference at the Vatican, with Pope John Paul its opening speaker.
Many bishops and cardinals have been collaborating with the RfP as Co-Presidents or Honorary Presidents. These include Peter Cardinal Turkson, President of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, who is the one tasked to follow up on Peres’ proposal; and Oscar Andrés Cardinal Rodríguez Maradiaga, the head of Pope Francis’ special advisory group of cardinals.
The Gorbachev Foundation/USA was set up as a Russian intelligence operation at the Presidio, a former military base in San Francisco, months before the dismantling of the USSR. Gorbachev is a major coordinator of world governance and a leading proponent of population extermination and the destruction of religion. This Marxist-Leninist met more than once with Pope John Paul and addressed the pontiff and political leaders at the Vatican in 2000.
The United Religions is a United Nations project. Plans for its formation were revealed to world leaders in June 1995 by Bishop Swing at the occult, earth-worshipping interfaith service he was invited to conduct for the UN, celebrating its 50th anniversary. Present at San Francisco’s Episcopal Grace Cathedral were political luminaries and representatives of all religions, including Britain’s Princess Margaret, Anglican Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, Polish President Lech Walesa, and UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Archbishop Renato Martino (Vatican nuncio to the UN) and Archbishop John Quinn of San Francisco also attended — i.e., the Vatican has known of the UR from the beginning.
Patterned after the UN, the UR is meant to be for religions what the UN is for nations: a “permanent gathering center where the world’s religions engage in daily prayer, dialogue, and action for the good of all life on this earth,” and where they will make peace amongst themselves and “work together for the healing of the earth.” Using the “light” of paganism and occultism, it aims to solve the usual social issues.
But more importantly, it’s also “an attempt to bring accountability to the religious forum”. As the world’s religious authority, it aims to wipe out “fundamentalism,” which is blamed for wars and conflicts. Teilhardian Robert Muller, a former UN Assistant Secretary-General and New World Order designer, declared that fundamentalism’s “inflexible belief systems” “play an incendiary role in global conflicts.” “Peace will be impossible,” he said, “without the taming of fundamentalism through a United Religions that professes faithfulness `only to the global spirituality and to the health of this planet.'” This is also the basic theme of the Peres proposal.
The United Religions gets a Charter
In 1996, Bishop Swing called the process of forming the United Religions “The United Religions Initiative 2000”. The name United Religions Initiative (URI) is still being used for the United Religions, although the one-world church became fully functional in 2000.
A “preliminary” charter-writing conference was held in June 1997 at Stanford University, California. The 200 delegates “predict[ed] they had given birth to a movement as well as a spiritual institution: the United Religions”. Bishop Swing “deputized” them to “tell the people that there is a United Religions.”
The URI Charter was finally signed on June 26, 2000, during a six-day Summit in Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, making the one-world church a reality. (June 26th is also the anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter.) The wording of the URI Charter suggests that “proselytizing” and upholding Christian morality could be considered threats to peace.
This interreligious Summit was opened by native spiritualists invoking “the great spirit,” and closed by a member of the URI Global Council who performed a Wiccan “blessing”. He invoked Hecate and Hermes, whilst Bishop Swing raised his hands in invocation. At least eight “highly respected” Catholic priests attended the Summit as supporters. Rev. P. Gerard O’Rourke, Director of Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs for the Archdiocese of San Francisco, declared he was there in an official capacity.
The URI is headquartered at the Presidio, with “satelllite centers” in other cities, including Buenos Aires. It has built up a wide international network through regional conferences and other activities. Its goal is “A U.N. for religion” that will foster peace. “We are going to end this millennium with peace among religions,” said Bishop Swing in 1997. “There is untapped solidarity among religions.”
Swing personally pitched the idea of the United Religions to many religious leaders. He got Mother Teresa on board, but posted no report on Pope John Paul’s reaction.
It should be obvious why the Popes cannot openly support the URI; to lead it would be tantamount to sailing the barque of St. Peter under the standard of Satan.
But it may be only a matter of time. At a Theosophical lecture in Boston in 1991, the New England Director of Theosophy described the plan for establishing the one-world religion:
This announcement supposedly would herald the Pope as the leader of the one-world religion.
Crafting an “epiphany moment”
So what prompted Mr. Peres’ sudden “epiphany” this year to create a United Religions? It certainly was carefully orchestrated to look spontaneous.
• April 2013: Peres visits Pope Francis. Inviting him to Jerusalem, “the sooner the better,” he says, “You have an important role in progressing peace and the belief in it”.
• January 2014: Pope Francis announces he will visit the Holy Land in May.
• February 2014: An Argentinian interfaith group created by Archbishop Bergoglio is greeted in Israel by Peres, who praises the Pope because “he returned religion into a spirit rather than an organization, a faith more than a church”.
• May 2014: Pope Francis visits the Holy Land. In front of the Wailing Wall he partakes in a group hug with his two Argentinian travelling companions, Rabbi Abraham Skorka and Muslim leader Omar Abboud. Vatican spokesman Fr. Lombardi enthuses, “They have given us a sign in a significant and holy place. This is an important message, that they can embrace together”. The pope also stresses the “universal and cultural significance” of Jerusalem, and its importance to Christians, Muslims and Jews. Before leaving, Francis invites Peres and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to the Vatican for a prayer meeting for Middle East peace.
• Only two weeks later, June 8, 2014, Pentecost Sunday: the two presidents and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew attend this interfaith prayer meeting on a triangular Vatican lawn, along with several high-up members of Religions for Peace. The “neutral” site chosen is devoid of all religious symbols. Catholic participants thus witness to the Masonic one-world religion instead of to Jesus Christ and His Church!
• June 9, 2014: Pope Francis criticizes “fundamentalism” in Christianity, Judaism and Islam as violence: “A fundamentalist group, even if it doesn’t strike anyone, is violent. The mentality of fundamentalism is violence in the name of God.”
• September 4, 2014: Peres shares his “epiphany moment” with the Pope and asks him to head his visionary United Religions. Father Lombardi reveals that this proposal followed from the syncretic June prayer meeting. He says the Pope “stressed to me” that the meeting was “the opening of a door” to encouraging further initiatives “to develop and go forward”.
War means success?
It seems the true God was not impressed by the atheistic Vatican prayer meeting for peace in the Middle East. The area exploded in war right after it.
On July 8th, Israel began a 50-day campaign against Gaza that killed more than 2,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians. Israeli deaths totalled 6 civilians and 67 soldiers.
And at the same time as the prayer meeting, Islamic militants began a bloody rampage across Iraq, leading three weeks later to the proclamation of a “caliphate” and a call-to-arms of Muslims across the world.
But Fr. Lombardi was very pleased with the success of the prayer meeting. He remarked after the September 4th audience, “The prayer for peace initiative which took place here” with Peres and Abbas, “is in no wise to be considered a failure – subsequent developments notwithstanding – but rather as the opening of a door…”.
Considering the massacres that followed the prayer meeting, this callous assessment implies that the Holy See is more devoted to the formation of the one-world religion rather than actual peace. Indeed, if peace were its concern, the peace plan of Our Lady of Fatima would have long ago been carried out.
And what about Nobel Peace Laureate Peres, touted as a “crusader for peace”? About a week after the Gaza offensive began, with 200 Palestinians and one Israeli dead, he defended Israel’s heavy-handed actions: “If they are shooting at us, and don’t let our mothers and their children … have a full night’s sleep, what can we do?”
But he needn’t worry. The One-World Church now has official papal blessing. Surely peace will follow swiftly.
Now, what does a Pope need to do to help create a One World Religion? Well he needs to demote Jesus from the “office” of “Son of God” and a deity himself to “just a man, another prophet”.
Granted, the guy in this video gets a little hot and passionate (but good for him – I don’t have a problem with that because he is recognising the shit which is the Pope and the catholic church) but he also speaks of phrases from the OLD TESTAMENT (which is NOT Jesus but the Jews’ Torah – Jesus is ONLY New Testament and it is something christians and catholics are VERY confused about. Why? I have no idea!).
So then let’s come back down to earth again and consider this guy, Nigel Farage. Even in his recent speech re Charlie Hebdo in the EU Parliament, what is he very sure he adds?
Now, I have posted before regarding UKIP and Farage and the fact that they started up a UKIP “Friends of Israel” just shortly before they started making serious gains in UK politics.
Look! You’re either a Jew or you’re a christian. There is NO SUCH THING as Judeo christian. It’s a total misnomer but it is one for a very specific purpose.
JUDAISM DOES NOT EVEN RECOGNISE CHRIST AS A PROPHET NEVERMIND A GOD OR MESSIAH! ISLAM, AT LEAST, VENERATES JESUS CHRIST AS ONE OF THE MAIN PROPHETS, JUST NOT THE LAST ONE WHICH. TO THEM, IS MOHAMMED.
Obviously, when Islam only came on the scene in 700 A.D., there would have to be a good reason for it otherwise they would just be a people who followed one of the other existing religions! So a new prophet was absolutely necessary BUT they don’t consider Jesus as a blasphemer and a false prophet (as do the jews), so what you don’t understand is beyond me!
ISLAM, like Christianity, does not believe in USURY! Judaism does! What the hell does it take to get these simple facts through your goddamned head and the penny to drop?