United States Congressional Record: The New World Order

Posted in Uncategorized by earthling on October 4, 2014

Apologies. This was a draft I had been working on but don’t have time to now. However, even what is presented here is worthy of note…….


It seems no matter what you present to some people, the penny will never drop. They just will never believe that such a struggle and serious conspiracy exists in this world to create a single World State, single currency, single religion and that it is to be based upon the OLD World Order. You can provide evidence after evidence from solid, reliable sources of information and these people will simply brush it aside as the rambling of a paranoid madman, OR, alternatively, they shall point at you like something out of the movie “Invasion of the Bodysnatchers” and emit that gut wrenching scream while all the others who wish to dismiss everything brought to their attention, join the scream chorus to demonise you.

With that said, I present this from U.S. Congressional Records:


Mr. Speaker, In order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining this Re-public, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the RECORD a number of articles to prove this point. These articles are entitled “Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife.” This is part I, and in this I include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled “Triumphant Democracy.”

In this he expresses himself in this manner:

“Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states—the British-American Union.”

This statement is clear, and the organizations which Mr. Carnegie endowed have spent millions in order to bring this about. This thing has been made possible by scholarships, exchange professors, subsidies of churches, subsidies of educational institutions; all of them working for the purpose of eliminating Americanism as was taught once in our schools and to gradually exchange this for an English version of our history.

These organizations were organized to bring about a British union, a union in which the United States would again become a part of the British Empire. However, this has been upset to some extent by the attempt of the internationalists to establish their own government as an International or world union. And there is, therefore, a conflict between the two, for England wants a British union, with America as a colony, and the international money changers want a Jewish controlled union, in order to establish their own world government.

It is, therefore, best for us to stay out of both of these, in order to save what is left of this Republic as it was given to us in 1787, by a people who knew more about international intrigue and the real problems that confronted the world, than we know today. These early founders not only understood the problems, but in drafting the Constitution they provided an instrument for us to follow, so that we could remain secure from foreign double-dealing and intrigue.

Had we adhered to the Constitution as it was given to us, we would have been secure and safe today. Therefore, it is our duty, in the interest of our people and in the interest of this Republic of the United States, to ponder seriously and to give fullest consideration to solving the problem which now confronts the world. In doing so, I am rather inclined to believe that the real American people will decide without hesitation, to return to those fundamental principles that were set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Let no one tell you that this instrument is not as valuable today as it was in 1787, for the fact is that it is much more valuable today—so much so that complete disintegration of this Republic cannot be avoided should we fail to return our Government to the principles set forth therein.


What will Britain do? The day is coming when Britain will have to decide on one of three courses. First, shall she sink—comparatively to the giant consolidations—into a third- or fourth-rate power, a Holland or Belgium comparatively? Here note that we do not postulate her actual decline, but the increased growth of other powers. Or, second, shall she consolidate with a European giant? Or, third, shall she grasp the outstretched hand of her children in America and become again as she was before, the mother member of the English-speaking race?

Assuming that other powers are to increase their present population (as Germany and Russia have yet room to do), or by further consolidation, it being evident that there is not room in the 120,000 square miles of the little, crowded United Kingdom for further increase of moment, then the conclusion is inevitable that one of these three courses is the only possible alternative, for Britain has no adjoining territory she can annex.

Some have been disposed to regard British federation as a possible fourth alternative, but the figures given, which convinced Rothschild and Rhodes, we submit, compel its exclusion, especially to such as seek for my motherland, as I do, a destiny worthy of , her—a future commensurate with her glorious and unparalleled past. Let us rejoice that this is open. Her Canadian and republican children across the Atlantic will hail the day she takes her rightful place in the high council of her reunited race—that race whose destiny, I believe with fthe world for the good of the world.

Mr. THORKELSON. Mr. Speaker, we are now dominated

and plagued by various pressure groups that care little or

nothing about the United States as long as they can involve

us in the present European war. Some of these groups are

well known, others remain obscure, but nevertheless very

powerful and effective in their insidious attempt to convince

the people of this Nation that war is impending. These

groups are composed of members who are generally classed

as the “intelligentsia.” I shall not question their intelligence,

but if one is to judge them by what they have said and done,

their intelligence is not being directed for the greater interest

of the United States. Aiding these groups, I believe often in-

nocently, are those whom we may take the liberty of calling

their tools and servants. We have reached a stage where

these anglophiles advance the thought that in order to

Qualify as a good American, one must be pro-English and

willing to fight and die for England. These England-first

groups and hands-across-the-sea organization are made

up of many Canadian and Anglo-American societies which


One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Why Trump and Farage? | Earthlinggb's Blog said, on November 22, 2016 at 1:38 am

    […] And look up “The Pilgrims Society” on Wikipedia. Note who the Patron is and then look at the names associated with it. (HINT: Liz) Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to read the speeches given by the American members of the Pilgrims, for they, like all converts, and more un-American and pro-English than the British themselves. ….. Mr. Choate then referred to a dispute which arose in regard to the passage of ships through the Panama Canal, and intimated that it was the understanding of Hon. John Hay and Lord Landsdowne that the British should have equal rights with us in the use of this Canal; a right which the British have never conceded to the United States in the Suez Canal. We have even been driven out of foreign markets by England for many, many years, and in her wars she has brazenly furnished us with a blacklist of firms with which we are not supposed to trade; and we, like fools, comply with her demands. …. Now the people of this country are not going to allow anybody— any Congress, any government, any President—to break the good faith which they have pledged to the mother country. In making this statement, Mr. Choate takes the position that Great Britain or England is our mother country; the same position that was taken by Cecil Rhodes over 50 years ago and by Andrew Carnegie in 1893, when he wrote a book entitled, “Triumphant Democracy.” I want you to note particularly that this was in 1913, and that 1913 was the very year we changed our Government from a republic to a semidemocracy; the year in which we destroyed constitutional government, international security, and paved the road for us to become a colony of the British Empire. It was also the same year in which we, by adopting the Federal Reserve Act, placed our Treasury under the control and domination of the Bank of England and the international banking groups that are now financing the British-Israel movement in the United States. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: