Earthlinggb's Blog

CID officer doesn’t know what a legal fiction is! My ass!

Posted in Law, The Corrupt SOB's by earthlinggb on February 17, 2014

The epitome of what I despise: A well trained (monkey), softly spoken, wilfully ignorant excuse for a human being who knows precisely what the legal fiction is (for if she does not, then she should be sacked considering her level within that protection racket she calls the CID) but makes the condescending remark of “I don’t know what books you’re reading”. Listen to me honey, you need to READ more books! But then you don’t “practice” law do you so you would argue you don’t need to understand it, you just enforce it. While you wish him to let you finish talking (because you do have that arrogance to believe that whatever is spat out of your mouth is of the utmost importance) but you do not extend the same grace toward allowing him to finish. In fact you don’t even listen because the one thing you cannot afford to do is have a debate on the subject of the person and common law because then you would never get your prosecution. And that’s the rub with you sweetheart: You’re not trying to protect anyone (there is no victim) and neither are you, as you suggest, trying to “get things right” for him. You don’t even wish to understand him but you demand he understands you. All you want is your conviction and, for some reason – probably for the camera and to give the public the impression that you are measured, in control and ever so fair – you keep that voice of yours “sweet” and quietly calm. But listen honey, some of us can see right through that shit. You’re a piece of work and, in my view, you’re a liar if you are suggesting that you do not have a clue what a legal fiction is. As the public become more and more aware of exactly what the legal person/legal fiction is, they will recognise you for what you (and your colleagues) are.

Unfortunately, we have a society which simply sees “drugs” and assumes a criminal. Perhaps they also have their prejudices against certain accents and/or class and you will use that to your every advantage plus the fact that the vast majority of people are as ignorant of the legal fiction as you pretend to be otherwise, in a jury of his peers – under common law – they would find there is no actual law against what he has done and find him not guilty. Personally, I don’t take drugs and I would rather not plus I’d never consider growing the stuff but that is my personal choice and preference. He, therefore, does not cause me a harm or a loss – no tort whatsoever. therefore, you are not protecting me and I don’t need your protection. You will say, on the other hand, “ah but there are people who do need our protection” (whether they wish it or not) yet all you are doing is removing freewill and choice. Anyone who bought his product would be doing it of their own freewill. Again, therefore, no victim. It’s called responsibility for one’s own actions and one’s own life. But I’ll bet you this sweetheart, if YOU don’t smoke the odd joint, your colleagues do! You bunch of corrupt, hypocritical little shits!

I wonder how this video has been released to the public however and for what reason? Interesting eh?

Advertisements

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Gazz said, on February 17, 2014 at 6:04 pm

    ‘She’ should . . she swears allegiance to one lol

    • earthlinggb said, on February 18, 2014 at 6:31 pm

      Yes she does. But her brain isn’t working too well like most of her colleagues’.

  2. Crystali said, on February 17, 2014 at 8:40 pm

    The perfect definition of a robotic drone preaching its own verbatim doing nothing more that protecting it’s own livelihood!

    I bet this was released to try and make example of the people waking up to their bullshit and making a stand with it. Terrible use of deterrent.

  3. Gazz said, on February 17, 2014 at 11:36 pm

    Maybe the lad uploaded his copy of the interview ?

    • earthlinggb said, on February 18, 2014 at 12:15 am

      If he didn’t sign for it then he wouldn’t be given a copy. I doubt he’d be given a copy anyhow would he? Maybe he would I don’t know.

    • Crystali said, on February 18, 2014 at 8:58 pm

      Simple way to find out, I asked him, he told me they had to give him a copy because he is representing himself.
      Fair enough, I was wrong!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: