Earthlinggb's Blog

Coronation Street paedophilia: “Wild Bill” CockRoache!

Posted in Paedophilia by earthlinggb on February 6, 2014

Subtle programming and subliminal advertising from our loveys at the “Street” once again…..

But I still know of a few people who will either just ignore it or make an excuse. Dear friends, brands and products pay big money to have their product advertised subtly in TV shows and movies. This DVD is NOT there by accident. It has been placed there very purposefully.

I wonder if Ken bought a copy?

1544480_669921853068737_1588803564_n

Now let’s consider the number of alleged pedophiles we have had from Coronation street so far. And is it just the tip of the iceberg? Well, we know Jimmy Savile was just a tip, we know there are quite a few in government circles (QUITE a few) and we have 4 known alleged paedos from Corrie:

Corrie paedos

Now who, precisely is “Kinsey”? Well Alfred Kinsey just so happens to have been a sexuality behavioural scientist – pretty much a pervert then to all intents and purposes. However, it went further than that while the Kinsey Institute are never going to admit it are they?

His projects gained funding from the Rockefeller Foundation and the National Research Council in 1942 so established the Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction at Indiana. He conducted interviews from 5,300 males and 5,940 females on which he based his groundbreaking works.

The research work of Alfred Kinsey almost ended after the release of “Sexual Behavior in the Human Female”. He had allegedly offended thousands of Americans and the U.S. congress exerted pressure on Dean Rusk, the incharge of the Rockefeller Foundation, to unilaterally terminate the financial support of the institute.

After failing to raise funding from other means, Kinsey unfortunately gave up his extraordinary efforts that revolutionized sexuality research. The institute, however, survived and is still functioning as an independent organization under Indiana University.

Alfred Kinsey died on August 25, 1956 of a heart ailment and pneumonia. He was 62 years old.

Now, let’s look at the paedophilia:

A Yorkshire Television Production for Channel 4.

So what’s the Kinsey Institute’s mission today?

Kinsey Institute

The Kinsey Institute today is soft soaping (sorry couldn’t resist the “soap” terminology there) the entire issue on their website and it is highly likely that many of those interested in the Institute today will never have even heard about the Yorkshire TV production. I question whether they’d even want to know or care?

From the Kinsey Institute website regarding the “allegations”:

Allegations about Childhood data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

Allegations about Childhood data in the 1948 book, Sexual Behavior in the Human Male

Allegations against Alfred Kinsey and his research on children’s sexual responses, as reported in Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, were first made in 1981 by Dr. Judith Reisman. She subsequently enlarged on these ideas in a book written jointly with Edward Eichel and published in 1990 (Kinsey, Sex, and Fraud). When The Kinsey Institute responded, Reisman filed suit in 1991 against The Kinsey Institute, then director June Reinisch, and Indiana University, alleging defamation of character and slander. In September 1993, Reisman’s lawyer withdrew from the case, and in June 1994 the court dismissed Reisman’s case with prejudice (which means that Reisman is prohibited from refiling the suit).

Below is a reiteration of these accusations, recently reported, and the Institute’s response.

The act of encouraging pedophiles to rape innocent babies and toddlers in the names of “science” offends. The act of protecting them from prosecution offends. The act of falsifying research findings which, in turn, open the floodgates for the sexual abuse of children, offends. (from Dr. Laura’s (Schlesinger) website)

This would be a cause of great concern if it were true. Kinsey was not a pedophile in any shape or form. He did not carry out experiments on children; he did not hire, collaborate, or persuade people to carry out experiments on children. He did not falsify research findings and there is absolutely no evidence that his research “opened flood gates for the sexual abuse of children.” Kinsey did talk to thousands of people about their sex lives, and some of the behaviors that they disclosed, including abuse of children, were illegal. In fact, many sexual behaviors, even those between married adults, were illegal in the 1940’s and 1950’s. Without confidentiality, it would have been impossible to investigate the very private lives of Americans then, and even now.

Where did Kinsey’s information about children’s sexual responses come from?

Kinsey clearly stated in his male volume the sources of information about children’s sexual responses. The bulk of this information was obtained from adults recalling their own childhoods. Some was from parents who had observed their children, some from teachers who had observed children interacting or behaving sexually, and Kinsey stated that there were nine men who he had interviewed who had sexual experiences with children who had told him about how the children had responded and reacted. We believe that one of those men was the source of the data listed in the book.

In a British documentary, a woman says she was sexually abused by her father and grandfather, and that her father justified it as doing research for Alfred Kinsey by filling out questionnaires. 

We have no reason to doubt that this woman was sexually abused. However, Kinsey did not ask people to fill out questionnaires. It is conceivable that this woman’s father or grandfather wrote to Kinsey, as many people have done. Following that documentary, we checked through Kinsey’s correspondence and could not find any that would match this story. We do know that there have been people who have used Kinsey’s name to justify what they do sexually, even recently.

Kinsey used a Nazi SS officer from Germany as one of his key contributors

In Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, Kinsey invited people to write to him about their sex lives. In 1955, a German wrote to him and told him about his sexual experiences with children. Kinsey, in his reply, was non-judgmental, as usual. He did however point out how strongly society condemned such behavior. Kinsey never made use of the information from this man. He also had no idea that this man had been a Nazi ten years earlier…. To suggest that Kinsey had something to do with Nazi torture of children is a bizarre fabrication.

Allegations and Controversy, 1995-1998

More Controversy about Childhood data
Soon after John Bancroft, M.D., assumed the directorship of The Kinsey Institute in 1995, he was called upon to respond to an allegation by the Family Research Council (FRC) about data on pre-adolescent orgasm that the late Dr. Alfred Kinsey had included 50 years ago in Chapter 5, “Early Sexual Growth and Activity,” of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (W.B. Saunders, 1948).

In the fall of 1995, Rep. Steve Stockman, Galveston, Texas, took up the FRC allegation, circulating a letter on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, in which he asked for support for a bill he had introduced to investigate Dr. Kinsey’s research. Stockman alleged that this data was derived from federally funded sexual molestation of children (the so-called “Children of Table 34”). Although Stockman’s staff were invited to put any questions to The Kinsey Institute and Indiana University, they declined. Stockman held a press conference December 7, 1995, calling for a congressional hearing. No hearing was held and the bill died. Stockman was defeated in the 1996 election.

In 1997, Concerned Women for America referred to this allegation in a press release with a renewed call for a Congressional investigation. In January 1998, Indiana State Representative Woody Burton submitted a House Concurrent Resolution to the Indiana General Assembly regarding Kinsey. In August 1998, a British television station produced a program based heavily on these allegations.

But then why would the UK or British governments wish to consider any action? After all, we have this:

wt

screen-shot-2012-09-20-at-2-28-00-pmobama_gay_scandal

ALL of it “alleged” you understand!

But lastly, don’t you get the feeling there’s more to this Kinsey Institute than just purely wholesome sex?

Of all things, they advertise erotic art with a cover photo showing the Goat of Mendes (Satan) about to spear a woman, from behind, with his obscured, erect weapon.

Kinsey 1

Not so subtle then!

Advertisements

15 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. anniefromfremantle said, on February 6, 2014 at 1:07 pm

    hey earthling

    Seems that TPV are using Gildan company to supply the t shirts they then print and sell. Gildan? Check out ts history

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gildan_Activewear#Exploitative_labor_practices

    Nick from Fear and Clothing asked a fellow DIF forumite what the brand of the shirt was that he received in the mail from TPV. The person told him, yes, Gildan.

    http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=267906

    thought you’d might like to know.

  2. Walter Sham said, on February 6, 2014 at 5:49 pm

    The masses are being conditioned to not listen to victims of celebrity paedophiles. They’re all ‘innocent’!!

    • earthlinggb said, on February 6, 2014 at 6:12 pm

      Interesting observation Walter and you could well be right by the look of things.

    • spartacus said, on February 10, 2014 at 3:26 pm

      That did cross my mind too Walter. Also when i looked at all the prosecution evidence, there is nothing there that is really solid. I personally have a gut feeling that Roache is as guilty as hell. It is almost like these cases are constructed to fail. Better watch the paranoia does’nt get me i suppose.

  3. Marko said, on February 6, 2014 at 11:30 pm

    Well I haven’t read the whole article. In fact, I barely even read the headline, but don’t let that stop me.

    Old billy boy and sons seemed a little too cocky in their expensive suits swaggering down to the ok/maybe not ok coral.

    Why act as a rapist if you’re not one? Surely they are aware of todays radical feminism climate?

    Anyway, what a surprise. Did anyone think it was going to be ‘Eh, Ken, do you want another bowl of porridge, sir?”

  4. Marko said, on February 6, 2014 at 11:40 pm

    Does dirty Dave get off? Oh please let it be Cliff. Jesus, did you see those soap opera fuckers at the DIF?

    Who needs corry, when you got a govt like this?

    My internet is breaking down, the wheels are coming off. I’m a gonna boot another OS.

    Unlucky fucking you.

    🙂

  5. Walter Sham said, on February 7, 2014 at 8:23 pm

    Look up William Roach on Youtube, he was on ‘This Morning’, getting all ‘New Age’- apparently he can converse with Jack Russells. / -:

    There’s an interview with him on a New Zealand programme, where he’s saying that people ‘bring it upon themselves’, if they’re ‘victims’ of paedophiles. That’s good old ‘New Age’ logic: ‘The Law of Attraction’!

    There are several videos of him saying that people shouldn’t ‘judge (more New Age/one-world-church nonsense to make people accept all kinds of sick behaviour.

    People need to wake up, truly…

    David Icke works for the very people he reports to be against. He is the controlled opposition, there to herald in an Alice Bailey/Madame Blavatsky ‘New Age’ of ‘enlightenment’ wew ‘nothing really matters’ and one should ‘do what thou wilt’- as Crowley put it.

    That’s what will bring down society, no morals, no empathy- just a bunch of drones plugged into Facebook and Twitter… looking at their ‘phones all day. Egotists… Icke sells the ‘New Age’ of only caring about the id- the self.

    They believe that if someone suffers from a disease, they ‘chose to experience’ it. What a load of sick people…

    Look at the UK Column, more of the same- make people chase their own tails, never pointing the finger towards the real culprits. Politicians come and go- in more ways than one- ot’s all a side show- bread and circuses!

    Anyway, that’s what I think! haha

    • earthlinggb said, on February 7, 2014 at 9:15 pm

      It’s what you think and it’s correct. I’ve said time and again, these people (the truth movement) are doing NOTHING. They will achieve NOTHING because they have no focus and they have no strategy. If you fail to plan you plan to fail. Period! At best they are incompetent, at worst they are leading people in an agenda while they make off them.
      That was an interesting Roache interview. I understood his point about the groupies. He is correct. What I found interesting was the parallel thinking he has with David Icke re people bring their circumstances upon themselves due to past lives. That requires just a quick blog in itself. So thanks for that.

      • spartacus said, on February 10, 2014 at 3:43 pm

        Remember Glenn Hoddle? He believed/believes the same as these goons. That rubbish came from his faith healer i believe. Now i held Hoddle in the highest esteem as a player, one of my favorite players to watch actually, and the same thing happened “sort of” with Arthur C Clarke, what a brilliant mind, BUT?
        THIS COMMENT DOES NOT INTEND TO IMPLY THAT GLENN HODDLE HAS A BRILLIANT MIND BTW, and neither does it imply that Clarke was a better player than Hoddle. sorry about that.

  6. Walter Shambles said, on February 9, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2554598/Cleared-Corrie-star-Bill-Roache-facing-fresh-anguish-three-women-make-new-sex-assault-allegations.html

    Since the legal profession have a penchant for Latin: Flamma fumo est proxima !

  7. Walter Shambles said, on February 9, 2014 at 5:20 pm

    Here’s an interesting Coronation Street scene (from 1978):

    Good old ‘Uncle Ken’…

  8. spartacus said, on February 10, 2014 at 3:46 pm

    Earthling, i want to click on the videos here but am now worried to do so. Do you check that they are safe to view?

    • cheryl Monti said, on February 14, 2014 at 12:56 pm

      Spartacus, if it’s any help I’ve clicked on to quite a few of the videos including the one above and it’s ok my end. Although, what a trip down memory lane! I was living with my mum in 1978 and we used to watch Coronation Street, I’d forgotten all about Uncle Albert. Haven’t watched the tele like I used to since 1998 when I nearly lost both my Sons through violence, that year changed me. Sorry, got of the subject. The video is fine my end, no problems.

      • earthlinggb said, on February 14, 2014 at 2:14 pm

        Sorry Spartacus, I missed that comment. The vids are fine, they’re just youtube standard vids.

  9. xtraxtra67 said, on February 17, 2017 at 11:56 pm

    Reblogged this on xtraxtra67.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: