Earthlinggb's Blog


Posted in Gross stupidity within society, Law, Media by earthling on November 21, 2013





The Grand media chessboard: King replaced by Bishop. Now pay your “tithes” to the Bishop!

Company founded 17th May 2013.

Two Directors appointed 21st May 2013.

People's Voice 6

David Icke fans throw over £300K of donations at company in their trust of David Icke, the Director. Free money, just like Quantatitive Easing, on the recognition of a “trust” – for that is what it is. The trust formed being that between David Icke and the people – the latter believing he will use that money in their best interests to buy all the equipment necessary to launch a TV internet channel and offer them a voice.

TPV, then, is launched and the people ignore the fact that the equipment was bought for just £20K.

Meanwhile, a twat called “Earthling” contacts OFCOM because he can’t quite figure out how David Icke is telling his entire audience that no regulatory licence is needed when even he, Earthling – not involved in media at all – can see just with a quick 5 minutes spent on google, that any tv style programming, even broadcast over internet, requires a licence by OFCOM/AVMS.

Contact made with OFCOM

From: Earthling
Sent: 08 October 2013 14:55
To: TV Licensing
Subject: Content licensing

Dear sirs,

 I am trying to understand the following from your information on the Ofcom website. Can you please tell me if it is necessary to apply for a content license, or any license, from Ofcom if one intends to set up an internet based broadcasting service from the UK with live news channels and others on a 24/7 live broadcast basis?

In other words, does Ofcom regulate such broadcasting in any shape or form?

Thank you,

To: Earthling
Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:29:12 +0000


Services which are broadcast from the UK via the internet are licensable.   This is set out in the notes of guidance for applicants and reflects the requirement of the Audio Visual Media Services Directive.

From: Earthling
Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:01:09 +0000

Thank you.

 I assume, therefore, you are aware of the internet TV station due for launch on the 18th November by the name of “The People’s Voice”?

Can you please confirm that this channel, run by David Icke, has applied for and been granted such licensing? It is being run as a “not for profit” enterprise, so we are led to believe (if it is not licensed as such by the appropriate authority, I would consider this to be a fraudulent claim) and Mr Icke has consistently expressed that there is no need to come under the auspices of OFCOM since he is broadcasting over internet. I believe he is incorrect from what you have just replied and I don’t consider that Mr Icke would not already be fully aware of the need to apply and be granted such a license.

Please treat this as a Freedom of Information Act request regarding a promoted “Not for profit” organisation requiring licensing, like any other, from OFCOM.

I presume there is no difficulty in responding to such a request for information. After all, you have just expressly stated that such a undertaking as Mr Icke is taking, requires a content license. I simply wish to ensure that such has been applied for and accepted.

Thank you.

Ofcom’s reply:

Ofcom 1

From: Earthling
Sent: 24 October 2013 17:49
To: Julia Snape
Subject: RE: The Peoples Voice 1-245308060

Dear Julia,

 Thank you for your confirmation that you have not issued a licence to “The People’s Voice” as of today. Having originally contacted Ofcom about the need for such a CONTENT licence for internet based broadcasting, I was advised as below:


To: Earthling

Subject: RE: Content licensing
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:29:12 +0000


Services which are broadcast from the UK via the internet are licensable.   This is set out in the notes of guidance for applicants and reflects the requirement of the Audio Visual Media Services Directive.

Therefore, my follow up questions are as follows:

1. I must assume, therefore, that if such an organisation has not been issued with a licence by the time of commencing broadcasting, that they shall be in breach of the statutory requirements in such an instance? This is a general question relating to any and all broadcasters and potential broadcasters of internet content. If this assumption is incorrect, can you advise me of the specific situations in which a broadcaster need not apply for and be granted a licence by OFCOM (or ATVOD)?

2. Specifically, is it necessary that “The People’s Voice” DOES have a licence (content licence) to broadcast? According to the reply above, this is the case. Is the reply correct?

3. Further, I would wish to add this: “The People’s Voice” is, as can be clearly evidenced by the continuing requests for donations by the public and the continuing promotion of the station as being “The People’s” station, suggesting it is purely being set up and broadcast FOR the “public interest”. It is the public funding it (unless I am mistaken – which is very probable in my opinion although that is not what is being “sold” TO the public). If, then, it promotes its entire raison d’être as being “in the public interest” then it is not, at all, in the public interest that they do not know and have no way of knowing whether the public’ interest is being served by the station/company (a Private Limited Company suggesting it is non profit) complying with the statutory requirements. If the public is not allowed such information then it is a clear indication that the company is acting in a private and non transparent manner and that OFCOM and present legislation is enabling such.

How, then, can it be stated that it not require a “public interest test” to provide this information for a broadcast network funded by the public? Please answer this question for me very logically.

4. Having read section 393(1) of the Communications Act, it does occur to me that for, as you say, the information to be “classified” (for that is what this is – classified and not available to the public), the “business” must have been granted a provision to operate under that act for the protection of section 393(1) to come into force. Am I correct?

393General restrictions on disclosure of information

(1)Subject to the following provisions of this section, information with respect to a particular business which has been obtained in exercise of a power conferred by—

(a)this Act,

(b)the enactments relating to the management of the radio spectrum (so far as not contained in this Act),

(c)the 1990 Act, or

(d)the 1996 Act,

is not, so long as that business continues to be carried on, to be disclosed without the consent of the person for the time being carrying on that business.

So, a legislative body related to government must have given approval for “The People’s Voice” (or ANY such broadcaster) to operate under the terms of the Communications Act 2003. Again, Am I correct?

5. To be given such approval and be protected from the need to divulge such information relating to whether or not the business has a licence to operate under OFCOM, obviously then suggests that the British government are entirely approving of the expected content from such a broadcaster. Am I correct?

 Please note, the above questions (4 and 5) are logical and can be answered in a general form. There is absolutely no justification for not replying to these questions in a general form then.

 6. Inasmuch as you, personally, will have the knowledge of whether the station is abiding by the statutory requirements then, in your capacity as an OFCOM employee (and one, therefore, who must abide by statutory legislation as you are doing now by not divulging what is written within the Acts) please state/confirm that you, in your capacity, would, and will, flag the noncompliance of any and all broadcasters who require a licence from you (or ATVOD). This may be treated as a freedom of information act request questioning a Freedom of Information Act officer. My guess is that, as such, such an officer would have to be transparent and factual in their reply (unless the FOI Act also gives some form of “pass” for that also?).

Thank you and regards,

RE: The Peoples Voice 1-245308060‏
Informatio​n Requests (
To: Earthling
Dear Earthling

Thank you for your further comments and questions regarding this matter. I will come back to you again in due course once we have considered the points you have made.

Kind regards


RE: The Peoples Voice 1-245308060‏

DAVID ICKE – The Queen,The BBC & The Royal Child Catcher To The Establishment

Published on 5 Dec 2012… Music “Jimmy Jangle” Braaayks Unskippable
Added on 07/03/2013
Hello Julia,

I am a little perplexed as to what may be causing such a delay in answering what I view as very simple, direct, to the point questions regarding general policy of OFCOM in regard to the issuance of licences.
I note, however, that OFCOM have, in fact, issued a licence to “The People’s Voice” within the last few days and that it shall be broadcasting from 25th November. Therefore, it would appear that OFCOM and the Secretary of State of the United Kingdom consider Mr David Icke a “fit and proper person” to broadcast to adults and children alike absolute contemptuous propaganda (some of which, no doubt, is based on facts but the driver behind it all being a man who is evangelising to the the British public and world at large that “Reptilian creatures from the constellation Draco are possessing the British Royal family and most of the political and banking class and causing them to, through a “Brotherhood” bloodline, ritually murder children after having paedophile relations with them and then drinking their blood to remain young”.
You (OFCOM and the secretary of state of the United Kingdom on behalf of the government of the United Kingdom) are stating to me that this is what you consider a “fit and proper person” to hold a broadcasting licence in this country? A man who slanders the British monarchy and many within the higher ranks of government, parliament, police, judiciary, banking and the list is never ending. He is being given a licence to spread this “knowledge” which is directly for the purposes of undermining the british public’s trust in the entire british establishment who control the issuance of such licences through legislation. A man who is deemed “fit and proper” perhaps because he has never been charged with a crime yet he evangelises to the public to “get off their arses” (his words) and “draw a line in the sand” and, effectively, is calling for revolution against the very establishment which is bestowing a licence upon him?
Please can OFCOM, and/or the Secretary of State, advise me whether you are serious? And I am not being flippant here, I am being absolutely serious in asking this question.
Mr Icke has created a Private Limited Company, protected by the Communications Act 2003 (as well as having to abide by its rules – which, in fact, he had no intention of doing because he had no intention of applying for licence yet, he has had many years experience in media, as you know and would have been quite aware of the requirements for such, internet broadcasting or not (after all, I did and I am not involved in such business yet it took me moments to recognise the need and a single email confirmed it) and is now to follow the guidelines and law applicable to such while, at the same time, he is broadcasting material which is advocating revolution against the very legislative body which provides him with such protection and licence.
There are a multitude of examples (they never end in fact) of Mr Icke slating the entire basis of British democracy and the history (up to present day) and the people who control such. He has even stated that his aim is to destroy the entire fabric of such control and he has an ever increasing number of followers who believe that his teachings (fundamentally spiritual/religious in nature) are factual. IF a teacher at an educational facility in this country were to teach what Mr Icke teaches his gullible audience, such a teacher would be sacked on the spot. Yet you are happy to provide this character with a BROADCASTING licence?
As for “fit and proper person”. You cannot “hide” behind the “Corporate person” fiction in this case because the Corporate person of “The People’s Voice” was not who picked up the phone or filled in the application for a licence and, therefore, without such a licence, that “Corporate person” would not be deemed to exist for its purpose. The “fit and proper person” has to be that of the natural person by the name of David Icke. It is that natural person who is a Director of David Icke books (which promulgates such teachings as above) and it is also David Icke who is the major Director (of two Directors) of “The People’s Voice”.
During the broadcast the station made live a few days ago, it was filled with the words of David Icke and also advertisements for his Wembley Arena show coming up in 2014 where he preaches to his audience his entire spiritual and highly political teachings.
To further make this point clear. From your own documents:

Determining who should hold the licence
52. Ofcom has published guidance about who we regard as the person who is the provider of a broadcasting (i.e. TV and radio) service and should therefore hold a broadcasting licence to provide the service. Generally, the provider of the service is the person who is in a position to determine what is to be included in the service or, in the words of the Communications Act 2003, the person “with general control over which programmes and other services and facilities are comprised in the service (whether or not he has control of the content of individual programmes or of the broadcasting or distribution of the service)”.

I understand for the Communications Act 2003 and the related passages of the 1990 Act that persons are disqualified from holding a licence who:
 Part II

Disqualification for Holding Licences

General disqualification of non-EEC nationals and bodies having political connections

1(1)Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the following persons are disqualified persons in relation to a licence granted by the Commission or the Authority:

(d)a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of a political nature;

(e)a body affiliated to a body falling within paragraph (d);

(f)an individual who is an officer of a body falling within paragraph (d) or (e);


    a body corporate which is an associate of a body corporate falling within paragraph (d) or (e)

The above states quite clearly “of a political nature”. Politics is defined in the Oxford English dictionary as follows:


  • 1 [usually treated as singular] the activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power:the party quickly gained influence in French politicsthereafter he dropped out of active politics
  •  the activities of governments concerning the political relations between states:in the conduct of global politics, economic status must be backed by military capacity
  •  the academic study of government and the state:[as modifier]:a politics lecturer
  •  a particular set of political beliefs or principles:people do not buy their paper purely for its politics
  •  (often the politics of) the principles relating to or inherent in a sphere or activity, especially when concerned with power and status:the politics of gender

Politics is not confined to purely political parties, as I am sure you are aware, but stretches across fundamental philosophy, belief systems, capitalism/communism etc and, also, subversive activities.
15. Applicants with religious objects are advised to allow approximately eight weeks for their application to be considered by Ofcom in the light of the Guidance for religious bodies applying for a Broadcasting Act licence ( guidance). Applicants should be aware that Ofcom is under a duty to ensure that it does not license bodies with objects which are of a wholly or mainly political nature, and will consider applications carefully in the light of its duties. Applications where questions arise in relation to this issue may take a number of months to consider.

And yet, where you state that such questions may arise leading to this issue taking a number of months to consider, you seem to have simply provided the licence to Mr Icke within a matter of a couple of weeks. I would have to seriously question OFCOM’s and the legislative body’s competence for due diligence in this regard. Otherwise, I have to simply deduce that the British establishment actually wish that Mr Icke and his “The People’s Voice” succeed in their subversive endeavours. It is either one of the two and I ask that you advise me which it is?
I have, below, provided direct quotes from Mr Icke’s book (only one of many on the same theme) “The biggest Secret” plus I have added a few youtube videos which clearly demonstrate Mr Icke’s politics, ambitions and teachings. In providing this to you, I am offering you the opportunity of carrying out further due diligence with respect to Mr Icke as a “fit and proper person” to hold such a licence and would request that you confirm that you have taken all of this onboard and that either: You still consider this man “fit and proper” or otherwise. If you do consider him “fit and proper” then please advise the Secretary of State that such teachings should form part of the educational curriculum in this country and, if not, I would ask why not? If it is suitable and acceptable for broadcast to the nation then it must be deemed fair and appropriate to discuss these matters and hold such beliefs. If so, then we live in an open and free democracy and, as such, teachers within our schools and other educational establishments, must, I assume, be free to impart such teachings for open discussion/debate with their students. If you do not see this as appropriate, then please state, logically, why this is the case.  (David Icke: British royal family and establishment murder children and drink their blood.)

From “The Biggest Secret”

“Advancing the Agenda becomes their indoctrinated mission from very early in their lives. By the time their turn comes to join the Brotherhood hierarchy and carry the baton into the next generation, their upbringing has moulded them into highly imbalanced people. They are intellectually very sharp, but with a compassion bypass and an arrogance that they have the right to rule the world and control the ignorant masses who they view as inferior. Any Brotherhood children who threaten to challenge or reject that mould are pushed aside or dealt with in other ways to ensure that only ‘safe’ people make it to the upper levels of the pyramid and the highly secret and advanced knowledge that is held there. Some of these bloodlines can be named. The British House of Windsor is one of them, so are the Rothschilds, the European royalty and aristocracy, the Rockefellers, and the rest of the so-called Eastern Establishment of the United States which produces the American presidents, business leaders, bankers and administrators. But at the very top, the cabal which controls the human race operates from the shadows outside the public domain. Any group which is so imbalanced as to covet the complete control of the planet will be warring within itself as different factions seek the ultimate control. This is certainly true of the Brotherhood. There is tremendous internal strife, conflict and competition. One researcher described them as a gang of bank robbers who all agree on the job, but then argue over how the spoils will be divided. That is an excellent description and through history different factions have gone to war with each other for dominance. In the end, however, they are united in their desire to see the plan implemented and at the key moments they overwhelmingly join forces to advance the Agenda when it comes under challenge.”

“As I revealed in I Am Me I Am Free, and will elaborate upon in this book, the Brotherhood hierarchy today are seriously into Satanic ritual, child sacrifice, blood drinking and other abominations that would take your breath away. Yes, I am talking about some of the biggest royal, political, business, banking and media names on the planet. People like Henry Kissinger, George Bush, the British royal family and many other presidents, prime ministers and members of royalty. Fantastic? Of course it is, but since when did the truth not sound fantastic in a world of such denial and illusion?”

“….as represented by the orthodox rabbis today, makes it a religious offence to save the life of a Gentile, unless there would be unpleasant consequences for Jews not doing so. The charging of interest on loans to a fellow Jew is banned, but by Talmudic law they must charge a Gentile as much interest as they possibly can. It is demanded that Jews must utter a curse every time they pass a Gentile cemetery and that when they pass a Gentile building they must ask God to destroy it. Jews are forbidden to defraud each other, but that law does not apply to the defrauding of Gentiles. Jewish prayers bless God for not making them Gentiles and others ask that Christians may perish immediately. A religious Jew must not drink from a bottle of wine if a Gentile has touched it since it was opened. The Jewish writer, Agnon, after being awarded the Nobel Prize for literature, said on Israeli radio: “I am not forgetting that it is forbidden to praise Gentiles, but here there is a special reason for doing so – that is, they awarded the prize to a Jew.”17 These are the laws of the belief system called ‘Jewish’ which is constantly complaining about, and condemning, racism against Jews! The very belief system is founded on the most extreme racism you will ever encounter.”

“Add to that the fact that the truth of what is going on is so bizarre that most people will not believe it and you have the perfect situation for ongoing, unchallenged control.

Until now.”

So he’s challenging the entire system – that is his MO and he is being given a licence to operate a broadcasting network BY that system?

“Another version is Lilibet or Elizabeth and this is why the present British Queen is called Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth) and was known to her family circle as Lilibet. She is a major reptilian gene carrier who produced a major reptilian full-blood called Prince Charles. Both are shape-shifting reptilians, a fact that will be supported by later evidence. So is the Queen Mother, formerly Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth) Bowes-Lyon.”

A FACT, he says. No suggestion. A fact! 

“Sir Winston’s daughter-in-law, Pamela, married the American, Averell Harriman, one of the great Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century and much documented in .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Pamela Harriman, who had formerly been married to Winston’s son, Randolph, became very influential in the American Democratic Party and is widely named as the force behind Bill Clinton’s election as US president. She was rewarded by being made US ambassador to the key Brotherhood city of Paris, where she died in 1997 at the age of 76. Her son, also named Winston, is a British member of Parliament who is close to the Rothschilds. Pamela Churchill-Harriman dated Elie de Rothschild before marrying Averell Harriman. In 1995 the Churchill family were given £12,500 million of National Lottery money when they sold some of Sir Winston Churchill’s Second World War speeches to ‘the nation’. The speeches were purchased with this public money by the National Heritage Memorial Board, chaired by… Lord Jacob Rothschild. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. The Churchill-Harrimans are bloodline families. One of Pamela Harriman’s ancestors conspired with the Percy family, ancestors of George Bush, in the attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament in the so-called Gun Powder Plot led by Guy Fawkes on November 5th 1605. As a Harriman, Pamela represented the ‘Democratic’ wing of the Brotherhood while the Bush’s, close associates and business partners of the Harrimans, represent the ‘Republican’ wing. Both have answered to the same master to ensure that the United States, like every other country, is a one-party-state. The Bush family are close friends of the Windsors, which shouldn’t surprise anyone who has read this far because both are shape-shifting reptilians. Bush and his associate, the Brotherhood’s tireless global manipulator, Henry Kissinger, have both been knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.”

“This is why I keep saying that London is the centre of the operational level of the Brotherhood. Even greater power lies elsewhere, some of it in the Vatican, and, ultimately, I think, on the physical level, somewhere under the ground in Tibet and Asia. The people of America have been bled dry by this scam and continue to be so. Land of the Free? What a joke! And, people of America, your presidents and leading government officials know this. In turn, it must be stressed, the King John agreement with the Pope presumably gave away the sovereignty of England, also. And who controlled King John? The Templars did.

When you know what you are looking for, the truth is in your face. I said that the Virginia Company and King James I decreed that criminal courts in the colonies would be controlled by Admiralty Law, the law of the sea. What Admiralty were they talking about? The British Admiralty, of course. When a court is being run under Admiralty or maritime law, the flag in the court has to have a gold fringe around it. Look in any criminal court in the United States or the united states and you will see it has a gold fringe. The same with many other official buildings. Those ‘American’ criminal courts are being run under BRITISH admiralty law. The Crown and the Brotherhood families of Britain also control the American criminal courts and the core of that control is with the secret societies based in Temple Bar in London, the former Templar lands, the centre of the British legal profession. The Grand Lodge of English Freemasonry is in Great Queen (Isis/Semiramis) Street in London and has controlled most Freemasonry across the globe since it was formed in 1717. Through this, the British reptile-Aryans control the American judges, lawyers, police, and so on, and through other organisations, like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, they manipulate the American political system. The American judges are fully aware that their courtrooms are controlled by British Admiralty Law, but they keep quiet and take the money. The Rockefeller family are the bloodline branch managers in America for the London headquarters and it is the Rockefellers who, quite provably, decide who is going to be President. In other words, the London Elite decide. The Queen of England, Prince Philip and the main members of the British royal family all know this and are helping to orchestrate it. Who is the Grand Master of the English Mother Lodge of Freemasonry? The Queen’s cousin, the Duke of Kent.”

Slandering George Bush (Snr) as a paedophile and a drug launderer. Icke has not been convicted of such slander but, nevertheless, he states it (while he also stated to me, directly, in the People’s Voice studios, that William Hague was also “into children” though he has never put this in print…..
“Control of the media
The names Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger and Carrington appear on the boards and ‘advisory’ boards of global media corporations and that’s no surprise. To control humanity through the mind and emotions you simply have to control the media. Without that it’s impossible. This is made so much easier because the overwhelming majority of journalists in the world, including the so-called ‘big names’ in each country, are either agents for the Brotherhood (the small minority) or they don’t know their arse from their elbow when it comes to understanding what is going on in the world. I’ve been a journalist and so I have seen both sides and what is termed the communications industry is really the blind (journalists) leading the blind (their readers and viewers). My experience as a journalist, and as the target of journalists, has shown me very clearly how remarkably few brain cells you need to do the job. Every day on television stations all over the world, journalists and correspondents give their viewers the official version of the event they are reporting. “White House sources say this…, the Prime Minister says that…, the FBI say the other… “In all my time in journalism I cannot recall a single conversation in a newsroom that didn’t reflect the official version of life and the world. Most journalists are not manipulating, they are simply stunningly uninformed and often incredibly arrogant. They believe that if anything of magnitude was going on they would know about it because they are ‘journalists’. In truth they are the last to know. Arrogance and naivete, the mental combination that produces so many journalists, is a telling and highly destructive combination. Add a padlocked mind and you’ve got the job. One BBC interviewer said to me in all seriousness that we should be no more concerned about the membership of the Freemasons than we should the membership of the local squash club. I’m not kidding. I have given many journalists the story of what is going on and they have either dismissed it without even looking at the evidence or they have ridiculed the information without looking at the evidence. I remember meeting a guy, I think his name was Taylor or something, in Los Angeles in early 1997. He worked for The Observer newspaper in London. I told him about the paedophile activities of George Bush and his drug running operation. I offered to put him in touch with some of those who had been abused by Bush. What did this ‘journalist’ do? He went away and wrote an article making personal attacks on me, including the fact that my eyes appeared bloodshot.”This is the sort of content that OFCOM are condoning. It is not that it shall ever be broadcast so openly and directly on the network by ANY of the employees BUT it is David Icke’s work through his books (which he is advertising and promoting on the network and the network is also his vehicle for “self promotion”) which his audience fully appreciates and buys into. His audience is literally buying the station for him (if David Icke is to be believed) through donations because of their belief in his teachings. OFCOM, therefore, are giving such a voice complete approval as a “fit and proper person”. You are, therefore, allowing this man to materially and financially gain (including his “The People’s Voice” employees) by advertising his books on such a broadcast network. You are not only allowing the broadcasting of subversive politics but also the evangelisation of what is essentially, a quasi religion.
OFCOM withdrew Press TV’s licence (for obvious reasons) plus OFCOM will either fine or withdraw the licence/ban any and all advertisements for products which are misleading in content and yet, you are allowing a person who promulgates the view that the British royal family are reptilian, shape shifters and part of a brotherhood of pedophiles and child murderers and you do not view these teachings and the asking of donations for a channel entirely controlled by this man, as “misleading”?

I am sorry but you have GOT to be kidding me!
An attempt to undermine the British monarchy and its government is quite factually, as per current legislation, TREASON. Yet you, acting as the British establishment’s regulatory authority and report to the Secretary of State for Culture, Sport and Media, are providing a platform for this man under the Communications Act 2003.


Finally, let me be clear that I, personally, am aware and in agreement with much of what David Icke states regarding the actual facts and workings of the political and financial system. However, this man, through his own words and teachings is exceptionally dangerous in what he is trying to achieve and by which methods and beliefs.
Either OFCOM recognise the dangerous subversive (and substantial misleadings) of David Icke and reconsider this application for a licence you have already provided or you are clearly stating that you are supportive of the aims of David Icke.

I would like to know which.

I look forward to your imminent reply on the questions put to you in my previous email and would also wish to hear (even at a later date) your reply to this regarding the decision that David Icke is a “fit and proper person” to hold a UK broadcasting licence.





What happened on the 23rd October 2013, just 5 months and 6 days into his Directorship? It would appear (I say appear and it is fact ON PAPER) that David Icke got sacked or resigned his position. What an interesting (and unexpected?) turn of events. Now WHY would the leading man, whom you all trust with your money, resign his position as Director and leaving Sean Tabatabai (the “Bishop”) as the ONLY remaining Director of “The People’s Voice Broadcasting Ltd” company?

Icke terminated Icke retired

Now, once more, check out the timing. It is precisely around the time David Icke states that contact was made with Ofcom and that fits precisely with the timing of my communications (thus far) with them. Oh I KNOW my communications with Ofcom created a stir because I have the words of Sonia Poulton, sent to me in confidence, to prove it. You have a very kind turn of phrase Ms Poulton you “old hag” (I’m simply repaying your “compliments” dear within a similar mould. It would generally not be a level I would stoop to but having read your comments, I see it is a level you do – wonderfully “enlightened” you are then and full of “love and light” for your fellow humans UNLESS they have questions that is right? They can and should question anyone and everyone except you it would seem – then the “claws” come out ;-)).

Two possible reasons:

1. OFCOM read their own regulations and recognised that they could not provide a Broadcast licence to THE PEOPLE’S VOICE BROADCASTING LIMITED with David Icke being the Director. The decision would not hold up to scrutiny given Icke’s political motivations (read the regulations and those who are disqualified from holding a licence).

2. The conflict of interest issue I wrote about in “David Icke: Sold to the highest buddha”.

However, no matter which (and it could be both) there are many questions surrounding this “chess move” by Icke and they are questions you should be VERY concerned about unless you simply have blind faith in the man. However, even having blind faith in the man, you STILL have a problem: David Icke is now NOT “the man” (at least on paper). It is not David Icke you are now sending your donations to -if you are and he is sending them on via his “David Icke Books Ltd” then that, in itself, is a legal issue. However, whatever is happening, the fact is that you are now sending your money to ONE MAN. A man called Sean ADL Tabatabai. The question is: Do you know him? Do you know ANYTHING about this guy (except that he works for David Icke). You were sending money to David Icke and now you’re not. David Icke is now a “volunteer” (haha) just like anyone else with the exception of the inner core.

So what the hell is going on eh? 😉 There is now ONE Director of THE PEOPLE’S VOICE and it’s Sean Tabatabai.

Yet do you think for ONE MOMENT that David Icke has seriously left the control of this entire enterprise to Sean Tabatabai? What is he? David Icke’s illegitimate son? Or is he something even darker than that? He’s a 31 year old guy – in my view not that bright but that’s just my impression – but he has something on a 60 odd yr old guy. Could a 31 yr old lad be a “handler” for David icke? Does David Icke NEED a “handler”?

Or is there another interested party in TPV which actually does have the total control over it? I wrote before about there being another couple of “People’s Voice” companies started within a month of your beloved one.

Now, it is possible that, to get the licence, Icke has resigned his Directorship and shall simply be re-instated once all the hoohah calms down. Yes that can be done. TPV can employ anyone they wish as a Director – it’s just at the point of application, if the main Director is a person who is deemed “not fit and proper” then that person (and TPV therefore) would not be given a licence.

Now do you think for one second that OFCOM wouldn’t know what was going on when they saw David Icke terminate himself and yet the company STILL apply for the licence? Do you think for one second they would not be aware that David icke would STILL be the driving force behind it?

Then think of David and his “Fight the system” shit. Doing what he has done is, once more, showing you he isn’t in the least bit interested in fighting the system. He’s dodging it WITH YOUR HELP! So where is he sticking his neck out? Nowhere! He’s a fucking fraud!

Meanwhile, I’ll republish the Sean Tabatabai info from a previous blog just for the sake of those who may not have read it:

Sean Tabatabai link to globalist operations.

So who’s the guy with the strange name (with “ADL” in the middle of it? A strange quirk considering isn’t it? Not that I’m suggesting anything I just found it funny for obvious reasons).

Well Sean is a Producer – as stated – and is also Icke’s “David” webmaster as well as his trusted partner in this venture. But he has strange connections. Now, anyone else with 47 connections on their LinkedIn profile, 2 of which (the most from one organisation) being the BBC, PLUS connections with “Newstate Partners LLP” (look them up) and “EF Education First (first for what? Conditioning students into a globalist mindset AND which has trips to Nazi Concentration Camps in Germany just to keep the holocaust in mind no doubt) would have ANY ONE OF YOU think “Ahah!!” if it were anyone else but the partner of David Icke but, since it is the partner of David Icke then “there must be some simple sort of explanation (which, you can be assured, there will be I’m sure).

Newstate Partners

Their roots with S.G. Warburg indeed while they advise governments and Central Banks on debt management etc. Yeah, he probably just does their websites too right? Plus the BBC’s, plus EF Education First – ALL globalist organisations. Sure the guy just has to make a living right?

EF Education First

Sean's network

Each of the circles on the outer ring represents one of his connections. This is where, if you hover over them on his LinkedIn page you find, amongst others, Newstate and EF. The large circle in the middle represents his largest number of connections with one organisation and that is only 2, both with the BBC.

Sure, if Icke has a LinkedIn he might even have a couple of people as connections from the BBC – who knows? – after all he used to work for them (Wogan might even be one of them! ;-) ) but Tabatabai having connections with them AND the other two is just a LITTLE teeny weeny bit strange. However, I’m sure you don’t think so so by all means carry on believing.

The words of an "enlightened" man. Rather misogynist but I'm sure Icke's female fans will forgive him. After all, it's only a joke right? Fish and slags. :-)

The words of an “enlightened” man. Rather misogynist but I’m sure Icke’s female fans will forgive him. After all, it’s only a joke right? Fish and slags. 🙂

Another nice little tweet from the "enlightened" Sean Tabatabai

Another nice little tweet from the “enlightened” Sean Tabatabai

Sean mod1Sean mod2

Now the following makes sense. Deanna Amato wanting ALL communications cc’d. Watch out People’s Voice workers, your calls and your emails are being monitored. You can take that to the bank!

  • UK Advertising Team‏

To see messages related to this one, group messages by conversation.
deanna (


To: aaron.calland@

<div “”=””>Cc: miranda.woodgate@, djkennedy@, mark, sylviachen, sally.singer@, kellykpr@, stacey@,,

Outlook Active View
3 attachments (total 2012.8 KB)
Download TPV program schedule 24-9-13.xlsx (158.1 KB)
TPV program schedule 24-9-13.xlsx
View online
Download The People's Voice Sponsor Deck.pdf (1812.9 KB)
The People’s Voice Sponsor Deck.pdf
View online
Download PROGRAMMES TO SORT TECHNICALLY 2 (1).docx (41.7 KB)
View online
Hi Aaron, Miranda, Dan, Mark, Sylvia and Sally…
Welcome aboard The People’s Voice – UK  Advertising Team!
David, Sean and I are very grateful for your contribution to this project.
It was discussed at yesterdays meeting that Aaron would co-ordinate this team, however, this is (as David states) not a dictatorship, so you are all welcome to offer suggestions and use initiative where appropriate, please work as an effective team – communication being the key, please keep me and the UK sponsorship team CC’d in emails we alI know what’s going on to date..
I would also suggest the following –
Aaron could send you all, the advertising package he has created,  that can be discussed as a group in a skype meeting.
The directory/list of ethical companies that has been initiated by Aaron could be uploaded into google docs allowing us all access-  to contribute companies we suggest and/or have contacted
You are all welcome to access the emails at
password : Eepp5CPj
Each of you will be given an email address with your name @ the peoples voice .tv as we are moving over to a new email server.
These inboxes listed above will become redundant so some or all of you (that are a lot more tech savvy than i am) may want to download the emails onto your OUTLOOK before this
All the leads/companies/contacts in the inboxes could be input into the directory spreadsheet that Aaron can upload to google docs?
I am also CC’ing as a FYI to Sean (director/business partner to David Icke) Kelly & Stacey (our US Advertising/Sponsorship/PR team) Simon Ludgate (head of production) – please note : anyone I may have missed who would like to be part of the UK team – details can be sent to Aaron to be brought onboard and up to speed 🙂
Attached are the following documents:
– draft of the program descriptions
– draft of the program schedule to pencil in program specific advertisers
– TPV sponsor deck in USD, GBP and EURO
Below are the details for the sales/advertising team in the UK – Name, Email, Skype and Phone contact :
{List removed for privacy}
If I have missed anything / left any details out, please let me know!
Thank you again for your passion, energy and willingness to contribute your time to make this project a sustainable alternative media outlet for the entire planet – on behalf of David and the entire TPV team – we cannot express how grateful we are that you are all on board!!!! It was lovely meeting you all – Sally, we look forward to meeting you too and showing you around the office. Until then, I send you all infinite love and hope you can all organise amongst yourselves to work remotely and make this a huge success!!!!
Deanna Amato
Executive director of operations (and seamstress. The former sounds much better however. )
The People’s Voice



New World media




25 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Will said, on November 21, 2013 at 8:05 am

    Well done Earthling! I would suggest that if David Icke is the UK’s own emerging L. Ron Hubbard (as Will Storr suggested in his Sunday Times piece earlier this year), then perhaps Sean is his David Miscavige?

    I did some searching and I see that Newstate Partners LLP is a corporate sponsor for Chatham House (Annual Review 2012-13, p.44) Ickeolytes should know from his books what the word is on that organisation.

    I suspect though there will be a simple explanation from Mr Adl-Tabatabai or from the TPV camp for the Newstate Partners link. And I am sure it will be just fine, nothing to worry about, nothing to see. But it would be nice if Mr Icke could extend the same courtesy to others, or at least demonstrate a belief in applying the same level of rigour when making more explicit and at times malicious accusations against others, as he does in his books, based on little more than a known or presumed connection.

    • san said, on November 21, 2013 at 7:51 pm

      lol….didnt hubbard say….if you want to get rich ,you start a religion?….. well DI fan club has become cult like

  2. san said, on November 21, 2013 at 9:30 am

    old sod and hold hag….lol……match made in heven 🙂

  3. Faro said, on November 21, 2013 at 11:19 am

    Problem Reaction Solution. Icke, Jones and the rest are the reaction, they will guide us into ‘The New Age’ or NWO. It wont be Orwell’s jackboot, it will be Huxley’s ‘love your drugged up promiscuous servitude’. A new cuddly R. Brand type future. That’s how I see it anyway.
    Ever get the feeling you’ve been had?

  4. TheEqualiserGB said, on November 21, 2013 at 2:36 pm

    Well done Earthling and keep up the good work !

    I was very skeptical about TPV right from start, but like you I initially gave it and the people involved the benefit of the doubt. But as time has gone on I have closely monitored situation with TPV and become increasingly disgusted about it, especially after reading of your terrible treatment regarding TPV and seeing the so called TPV ‘telethon’ ( complete with adverts for David Icke’s Wembley 2014 talk and rather too much promotion of Gareth Icke’s music career for my liking) .

    More to come from me in due course.

    • Babs said, on November 21, 2013 at 7:07 pm

      Yes and wasn’t that music just bloody awful!! I had to switch it off as I couldn’t stand it, talented musician is he? Not to my poor ears he wasn’t………….

  5. Gazz said, on November 21, 2013 at 3:17 pm

    He really should have paid You those expenses . . . 🙂

    Fantastic work earthliggb – keep it up.

  6. Babs said, on November 21, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    Somebody this morning questioned why DI had quit the company and within 5 HOURS the thread was shut down by a mod!! They sure don’t like questions about DI on his forum!!

    • TheEqualiserGB said, on November 22, 2013 at 1:43 am

      Yes I was going to comment about that thread here Babs but you beat me to it. 😉

  7. Linda said, on November 21, 2013 at 11:15 pm

    It seems that the slightest hint of doubt or questioning of TPV on David Icke’s forum is being roundly dumped upon from a great height by his team of busy bees and fanclub.

    I had a look on there today, after reading your post, and found a very interesting thread under ‘whats the point of the people’s voice?’ (via ‘main forums’, ‘human race get of your knees’, ‘the people’s voice’) where one poster raised perfectly (perfectly valid) questions around the how Icke intends to go about advertising TPV to a wider audience – more or less saying that if said wider audience cannot be reached, then TPV will simply be a glorified and larger version of the David Icke forum i.e,, appealing only to ‘fans’. Needless to say he/she was swiftly dealt with – roundly scorned, scoffed at, toyed with and generally mobbed, before a ‘Forum Adviser’ posted this:

    ‘This is exactly what David talks about, people bickering on forums.

    Meanwhile there are those trying to make a difference, actually DOING something.

    Really laughable this is.

    I will reopen after everyone has counted to a thousand.’

    Followed immediately by this:

    ‘Moderation notice

    While there may be some genuine questions that may be asked about TPV, the type of bickering and petty mud slinging is way out of order.
    There are people who are working bloody hard on getting this off the ground, those that are only here to spread negativity and cause disruption will be dealt with, thank you.’

    The People’s Voice. Really………..?

    • earthlinggb said, on November 21, 2013 at 11:26 pm

      Yes indeed. You dare ask questions in any form which cast any doubt on anything which Icke does or says (and Tabatabai is also involved in) AND YOU SHALL BE DEALT WITH!
      Anything that is not “Oh David, we love you…” is “negative”. ANY form of questioning at all is “negativity”. “We don’t need your kind of energy”. Positivism is all about never questioning the messiah. It sounds so incredibly like the government doesn’t it? If you question government you’re a subversive, paranoid terrorist. If you question Icke then you are precisely the same from the Icke moderators (his protection) perspective. And yet, I’ll say once more, the vast majority of Ickolytes just cannot recognise the obvious.

  8. Marko said, on November 22, 2013 at 12:00 am

    Yup. He really should have paid you those expenses. 🙂 It would have been money well spent. He’s sorry now of course, but…

    I had to stop reading on the thread about him resigning that was on the DI forum. Some poor person with mental health issues was comparing him to Tesla. Truly pitiful and I won’t criticise those less fortunate than myself in the marbles department (and god knows I’m lacking enough).

    And wtf is it with all this ‘negativity’ bullshit? Are they being serious? I guess they are. They are also paranoid, because they seem in full on damage limitation mode at the moment, with anything vaguely resembling dissent or questioning the status quo, swiftly nipped in the bud. Talk about an over reaction to a genuinely worthy and valid question. I would advise them that anyone asking a question like that be treated with respect and answered properly. It would be good PR for them unlike the bad PR it has become with them looking like a bunch of self-defensive yes men who have been had and who don’t know where to draw the line any more.

    Great entertainment for me. I never bought into it in the first place. Though I did believe in Icke in as much as I believed he was doing it for the right reasons. My opinions on the man are changing day by day with this bullshit though.

    As for the OFCOM situation. Well that stinks to high heaven as well. It will be interesting to see how they answer your concerns. Hell, it will be interesting to see if they even do answer your concerns, this century.

    How much was your train fare btw? About 50 quid wasn’t it? Not really a LOL type of person, but hey, have a one off LOL from me.


  9. TheEqualiserGB said, on November 22, 2013 at 1:38 am

    I agree with Babs below in the thread, Gareth Icke a Talented Musician? Erm I dont think so 🙂

    Apparently he is signed to music label Eromeda Records :

    Seems Eromeda Records bailed out TPV regarding the set for ‘The Banned’ :

    Wonder if anyone else signed to Eromeda Records will appear on ‘The Banned’ ? 😉

    Eromeda Records were also tweeting 21st October about ‘The Banned’ been a show on Sky as seen here : Which as you can see Gareth backtracks in a reply in the insuing.conversation quickly.stating TPV will be on Sky ‘Eventually’

    Interesting I think when compared to this article dated 1st August in York Press : . That talks about ‘Gareth’s two-hour music and arts show on Sky and American Cable will begin in November and will be filmed at an intimate London location’. Similar is stated here :

    The further questions this raises after what has been stated by TPV regarding the OFCOM licensing situation should be obvious to anyone who has read Earthlings excellent blog posts on the subject. Additionally I now question how ‘The Banned’ ultimately ended up on TPV.

    Day by Day the more I discover about TPV and the core people behind it the more disgusted I am.

    TPV in my opinion be renamed ‘The Icke family and Associates Voice and Business Promotion TV’

  10. TheEqualiserGB said, on November 22, 2013 at 2:57 am

    Regarding David Icke and directorships/shareholdings he has no active Directorships or Shareholdings listed in active, trading companies I could find currently. His only active directorship appears to be for the Dormant since the mid 1990s , non Trading ‘Isle of Wight Sport Limited’ .

    In the case of ‘David Icke Books Limited’ the following are the current Directors and shareholders according to companycheck co uk website :

    Mr Gareth Icke Director and 10% Shareholder
    Mrs Linda Christine Atherton Director and 80% Shareholder (David Icke’s first wife)
    Kerry Cooney 10% Shareholder (David Icke Books Employee)

    David Icke Resigned as a director in August 2007.

    Which In my mind raises the question of how David Icke is renumerated for his Book Sales and lecturer tours etc ? Most obvious way is as a Paid by Salary and/or Commission employee.of some form.

    What is there to say that David Icke is not been provided a monthly salary from TPV in a similar way ? As Earthling excellently described in previous blog posts a ‘Not For Profit’ Company of course does not mean no salaried employees 😉

  11. Chas said, on December 5, 2013 at 12:17 am He has some insights.

  12. Chas said, on December 5, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    Icke uses Matt’s stuff without attribution.

    • earthlinggb said, on December 5, 2013 at 3:26 pm

      I have too from time to time particularly where I don’t see anything particularly awe inspiring about what is in your face. I mean the Queen’s national anthem issue is precisely that. Can hardly be considered a “theory” conjured up by any one of these men or anyone else. The trouble is when people try (and do) pass off others work as their own and CHARGE for it. The fact is that every word we utter or write is stuff from an earlier time and another source. To me, copyright law is bullshit essentially. IF you have the right intentions re using other people’s work (after all, every piece of human progress is based upon other people’s work) then I see zero wrong with that. Icke, however, is not doing this for the love of humanity.

  13. Luke said, on December 5, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    I suggest earthling, that you watch some of the programs on The People’s Voice and document any mention of shape-shifting lizards, and the like. I don’t think you’ll find any.

    You might learn some things too, unless you’re not open to that of course.

  14. A real truther said, on March 4, 2014 at 11:09 pm

    Fuck off Luke you cunt 🙂

    Regarding Gareth Icke (the Musician lmfao) – My cat has more musical talent in it’s tail than that fuckwit!

    The only reason David Icke held his talk at Wembley in 2012 was so Gareth could put on his CV that he had played live at Wembley

  15. Joseph said, on May 5, 2014 at 12:06 am

    Everyone has to make a living. What is wrong in making some money, especially when you do a very excellent good job for all the ignorant people in this world: opening the peoples eyes and spreading the real truth about who is running the world. David Icke has put so much effort in his work for more than 20 years. He truly earns his credits. People who know him and follow his work knows that and appreciate his ‘full time job’! He is one of the real hero’s in this world! That’s for sure, because he provides the people with real knowledge and understandings. Everyone who knows the real intentions of David Icke and heard him speak in public (I had the privilege of seeing and hearing him on stage for 10 hours in Amsterdam in 2011) cannot accuse him of being wrong. There is so much in the unseeing world of our planet and David is making it all understandable and clear for all the people who don’t choose to close their eyes for the unknown truth. I’m sure he is spending the money very well. He knows what he’s doing. He is making the right choices. On that you can surely trust him. The man has his heart on the right place!!! If the New One World Order should be the future for us, than we all should vote for David Icke as our real new leader. He can make peace all over the world. He can make new laws for all the people, not only for the rich and wealthy aristocrats. He can provide everyone with free energy (which exists already). He can realy make the people free!!!

  16. Kate said, on December 23, 2014 at 8:29 pm

    I just saw Icke on PrisonPlanet with Alex Jones on Youtube — appeared to be November 2014. Icke appears to be a joke, with Jones tolerating him and cuting him off. Jones seems authoritative and credible whereas Icke looks like a pretender — and I am not even a fan of Jones. How far he has fallen!

    Icke positioned himself in his studios (Paid for with the people’s money) — with people walking around in the background. He got his own studio — paid for by gullible dupes. Jones humorously asked Icke to shut the door, telling him he liked the look of the studio but couldn’t hear him with all the noise in the background…..

    Icke shut the door behind him…

    Looked like Icke was green with envy. He aspired to have what Jones has at 20 years his junior — his very own news channel, radio show, and news. Icke just plagiarizes and aggregates news through links. There is nothing original about him — and his latest stint on the space aliens destroys any credibility he might have.

    Icke is a great side show, but he is not intelligent or well read. I think this man just stumbled upon some infomration and tried to capitalize on it. Add drugs into the mix and you have Icke. His son, Gareth, looks like the product of drugs, if not a druggie himself.

    Joe — there are so many other credible sources of news that offer the alternative perspective. Icke copies the work of others. He might be a charismatic speaker, but is largely irrelevant — and frankly looking old. Stick a fork in Icke. He’s done.

  17. Kate said, on December 23, 2014 at 8:36 pm

    Jones also had the confidence to let people take the mick out of him in comments sections. Icke’s people silence all dissident and praise Icke as the “world’s greatest..blah blah blah…” Icke is a psychopathic narcissist. He stumbled upon New Age malarky and declared himself God-head. He also denies God…Look at the fruits of this man and all the chaos, drama that surrounded TPV. Reflects poor business planning, discernment, and outright greed. Where did all the money go? To make a stuiod for Icke that could have been acquired for far less — as an inexpensive channel on YouTube. He’s convincing because he’s a charlatan…but everyone who knows this guy distances themselves soon after, regardless of how he performs on the stage. He’s a narcissist. I pity the poor, misguided fools who still follow this delusional character…

  18. Joseph said, on December 25, 2014 at 1:51 pm

    Hello Kate,

    Can you provide the link from the youtube video you saw? I think the readers of this blog would like to see this video. Was it actualy from 2014? It sounds more like 2013 when David Icke was more occupied with TPV.

    In 2014 he held a grand conference at the Wembly stadion in London. Seems that he certainly “is not done” yet. Ok, he might not have a universal degree in business management, but he did made many huge steps (in his own way) for mankind to open their eyes. Whether you like him or not, the man is speaking the truth. And in this world were all thing are upside down there are always people who are opposed to speakers like David Icke. It is not nice and to judge other people and writing them off, just to give an opinion on one video. Maybe he has a bad day once in a while. How many hours of time did you actualy listen to him in all those years? If you follow him for many years, you would probably know that he has (and had) a very hard life to do this job. David earns his credits! Yes, he may have his own style, but it’s all about his message. His apearance is not so important. It’s up to the listener to pick up his information and learn, for the benefit of the development of mankind.

  19. Joseph said, on December 26, 2014 at 1:08 am

    Dear Kate,

    Your message is very interesting. Thank you for your comment. As a follower of David Icke, I think that the rabbit hole is even more deeper than David Icke realized himself. The only real truth is Jesus Christ. Jesus said: “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man can come to the Father but by me”. According to the Holy Bible the Christ is the light. This means that he can be interpreted as a metaphore or a synonym of enlightenment. The only way to come to God the Father is to become enlightent first. And to become enligtent, you have to be on the spiritual level. The only way to get there is by meditating and cleansing your body (and mind). So through Christ you can come to God.

    Three pieces of the puzzle fall in the right place here:
    (1) David Icke does not talk much about “Jesus Christ” in his books or in his videos and I cannot recall him saying that Jesus Christ is the only right path to walk. David Icke does however, talkes more about the only true way, called “love”. This makes me thinking… David Icke seems not to be a spiritual follower of Jesus Christ.
    (2) David Icke never (or rarely) talks about meditating and he does not teach spiritual awareness.
    (3) David Icke is never stopped by the global elite. He is protected somehow by an unknown force.
    The same goes for Alex Jones.

    THIS IS A REAL EYE OPENER!!! >>> Here is a link to a video that gives the reader/viewer a different perspective of David Icke and also in relation to Alex Jones.


    Thank you, Kate.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: