Earthlinggb's Blog

Islamic Fundamentalism (Wahhabism) created by Zionists!

Posted in "Terrorism", Geo-Political Warfare, The illegal wars by earthlinggb on January 15, 2010

291a

 

 

You ALL believe that Islam is the enemy. You believe Muslim Fundamentalism is at the root of all evil.

But you are wrong. The con is massive and the con stretches across the entire Islamic world also. As much as YOU (We) don’t understand the conflict NEITHER DO THE TRUE MUSLIMS!

Why?

This is why:

  • Give some thought to the fact “Osama Bin Laden” came from a sect of the Wahhabi tribe.
  • Consider the fact that the majority of the hijackers on 9/11 weren’t Iranian or Iraqi or even Afghani but were SAUDI NATIONALS!
  • Consider the fact that the Saudi Royals and their country – while the rest of the Arab/Muslim world are demonized by the USA and it only takes ONE guy (Nigerian but boarded a plane in Yemen) to have the USA focus on “Al Qaeda in Yemen” – is NEVER a target of the USA while the MAJORITY (yes I repeat it) of the 9/11 alleged hijackers were Saudi nationals!!
  • Consider that, for now, it is the Saudis who are in control of the Oil in the gulf to the greatest degree AND they set the price to the world (along with their Zionist/American “friends”) while Iran (and Iraq) have significant oil reserves and are happy to consider LOWER prices!!
  • Do you never wonder why Saudi does not protest about Israeli nuclear missiles, while they object to Iranian power plants?
  • Did you forget that AL SAUD were SADDAM’s biggest supporters to attack Iran in 1980?
  • Isn’t it strange that Saudi is very quiet when Israel attacks Lebanon / Gaza or American/Nato troops kill civilians in IRAQ and Afghanistan?

I COULD GO ON AND ON but I won’t.

Let me just let you chew over this for a moment:

King FAISAL AL-SAUD declared to the WASHINGTON POST on Sept. 17, 1969:

“WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.”

In the 1960’s the “Sawt Al Arab” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the Saudi Family ” – James Matthew Cantu


The Saudi Royal Family are Zionist with their origins going back to MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE’.

And Wahhabism is the House of Saud SECT – a total corruption of the Islamic faith which was promoted by Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of “Wahhabism” an ‘austere’ form of Islam. al-Wahhab arrives in the central Arabian state of Najd in 1744 preaching a return to “pure” Islam. He seeks protection from the local emir, Muhammad ibn Saud, head of the Al Saud tribal family, and they cut a deal. The Al Saud will endorse al-Wahhab’s austere form of Islam and in return, the Al Saud will get political legitimacy and regular tithes from al-Wahhab’s followers. The religious-political alliance that al-Wahhab and Saud forge endures to this day in Saudi Arabia.

The research of Mohammad Sakher led to an order for his death by the Saudi Regime for the following findings: The Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from Jewish merchants from Iraq. Sakhir found that the Jewish Ancestor of the Saudi family was called Mordakhai Bin Ibrihim Bin Moshe but changed his name to Markhan Bin Ibrahim Musa.

There are records in the British war Museum that the British paid 15,000 pound sterling per month to the thug Ibne Saud to oppose Muslim Ottomans and with explicit instructions to share the money with Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab because he introduced Ibne Saud to the British. The British ordered Ibne Saud to have a relationship with Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab and now the present day Saudi family are descendants of both Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab and Ibne Saud. Also, the british sent a spy named “Hempher” to convince Muhammed bin abdul wahab to create the “wahhabi” sect…this was to create groups between muslims and divide them…..due to this, today all saudis are wahabis.

The House of Saud, therefore, works WITH the US, British and Israeli elites AGAINST the REAL Muslims of Iraq/Iran etc. The House of Saud (with their 9/11 hijackers – who, in fact, I do not believe WERE on those planes) works WITH their Zionist chums to create the vision that the true Islam is terrorist when, in fact, the House of Saud are Zionist working with the west and hate the true Islam.

Why? Because the House of Saud – if they did not play this game with the UK, USA and Israel – would be targeted for regime change as much as Iraq/Iran and Afghanistan etc. What you need to remember is that, not only are they Zionist by this ‘austere’ form of religion CREATED by a zionist BUT they also have a LOT to lose if they don’t play with the west.
The people of the Muslim world are as confused as we are about all of this. The Saudi people do not recognise this con. They know as much (generally speaking) about the history of their country and the history of their religion and politics as we do. Perhaps less because they are so controlled and conditioned.

It’s a pure mindf*ck people. It is again, the elites brainwashing the masses for divide and conquer and this little part of the story goes back to the Ottoman Empire and why that was destroyed by “us” (“us” being the Bankers again!).

Now, you may say “But the Saudis and Israelis are mortal enemies and have fought wars!!”

Yes they have fought wars. Who has died due to them? The House of Saud? No. We Brits have fought wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. Are the people of these countries mortal enemies of the people of the UK? Yes IF you believe the propaganda of our governments. How many of you are willing to today? How many of you believe Blair should be convicted for lying to us? And who have died in OUR “wars”? Name a government official’s child who has died?
A country they refuse to recognise or even negotiate with: Hmmm look deeper and just read the words of the King again! “Cousins”.

You may point to the Saudis giving safe havens to Hezbollah etc….

Think on this:

Does a government do what it’s people wish? Has ours?
When our government supported the Iraq war and the people didn’t, did they care?
Again, this is nothing to do with Saudi people OR Jewish people. This is to do with governments and regimes.

When our government threw its people into Iraq and Afghanistan, did it affect our government? Have any of our government or their families died in those “wars”? No.

Did any of the House of Saud die in the Saudi/Israeli war? No.

The House of Saud (as with our own government/establishment) manouvre the pieces of a chess set as and how they wish. The House of Saud will quite happily give safe haven to organisations which are against the Israelis while the House of Saud shall support the Israeli regime. But you can’t get that in your head can you?

As for safe haven? Let’s take a look at one Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad (Islam4UK Choudary’s chum):

In Beirut, he joined Sheikh Khalil Al-Mat and the local branch of Hizb Al-Tahrir. Then, in 1983, (or according to some versions in 1979 during Syria’s invasion of Lebanon) he took the alias of Omar Fustuk and settled in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he established “Al-Muhajirun” as a front for the Hizb Al-Tahrir in the Arabian Peninsula. Al-Muhajirun now has offshoots in Lille, France, and Hanover, Germany. In 1995, 47 Sunni organizations were reported to be active in Western Europe under the umbrella of Hizb Al-Tahrir, which is headquartered in Hamburg.

In 1985, after the Saudi government deported him he then went to London where he later left Hizb Al-Tahrir following a disagreement with its leaders. While Bakri wanted to deal with numerous issues troubling the Muslim community, such as racism and unemployment, the Hizb Al-Tahrir leaders claimed that such activity would sidetrack the party from its main goal, the establishment of an Islamic caliphate.

In 1993, Bakri became a legal resident of Britain, and in March 1996 he applied for citizenship.

So: The Saudis DEPORT the guy and where does he end up going? THE UK!!

So here we have a government (the British Government) accepting a “known terrorist” who has been “thrown out” by the Saudi government and given him SAFE HAVEN in the UK.

So according to this idea of Saudi giving safe haven to terrorists, just as the Saudi government are evil because they give safe haven to what you describe as terrorist organisations and people, can’t we now say the same for OUR government?

Does that make the UK and its people (who have no say) a terrorist nation?

Think through the logic!!

So, basically, what I’m telling you is this: the entire terrorism threat is being orchestrated by the Zionists within Israel/Mossad, the USA/CIA and Britain itself along with help from Saudi Arabia in the form of the house of Saud (Saudi Royal family) who wish to retain their positions as Kings of the Middle East while collaborating with the Western Zionist machine.

There is a long time established and very respected organisation by the name of the CATO Institute based in Washington D.C. I happen to have come across a document of theirs dated 1992 which is a Policy Analysis of the US Government and the title of the document is “The “Green Peril’: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist threat”.

Again, I repeat, this is 1992.

Here are excerpts which, I hope, when you make a comparison of what I have just discussed you may well then appreciate the reality of it.

You may also clearly recognise that, if you were also to read “The Grand Chessboard” by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the PNAC document “Rebuilding America’s Defences”, you would have no shadow of a doubt about the con which is being played out in manipulating YOUR belief that we have a TRUE Muslim threat. For we never have.

Excerpts: (oh, by the way, it’s written by Leon T Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post).

Now that the Cold War is becoming a memory, America’s foreign policy establishment has begun searching for new enemies. Possible new villains include “instability” in Europe –ranging from German resurgence to new Russian imperialism– the “vanishing” ozone layer, nuclear proliferation, and narcoterrorism. Topping the list of potential new global bogeymen, however, are the Yellow Peril, the alleged threat to American economic security emanating from East Asia, and the so-called Green Peril (green is the color of Islam). That peril is symbolized by the Middle Eastern Moslem fundamentalist–the “Fundie,” to use a term coined by The Economist–a Khomeini-like creature, armed with a radical ideology, equipped with nuclear weapons, and intent on launching a violent jihad against Western civilization.

“Islamic fundamentalism is an aggressive revolutionary movement as militant and violent as the Bolshevik, Fascist, and Nazi movements of the past,” according to Amos Perlmutter. It is “authoritarian, anti-democratic, anti-secular,” and cannot be reconciled with the “Christian-secular universe” and its goal is the establishment of a “totalitarian Islamic state” in the Middle East, he argued, suggesting that the United States should make sure the movement is “stifled at birth.”
The Islam vs. West paradigm, reflected in such observations, is beginning to infect Washington. That development recalls the efforts by some of Washington’s iron triangles as well as by foreign players during the months leading up to the 1990-91 Persian Gulf crisis. Their use of the media succeeded in building up Saddam Hussein as the “most dangerous man in the world” and as one of America’s first new post-Cold War bogeymen. Those efforts, including allegations that Iraq had plans to dominate the Middle East, helped to condition the American public and elites for the U.S. intervention in the gulf.

There are dangerous signs that the process of creating a monolithic threat out of isolated events and trends in the Moslem world is already beginning. The Green Peril thesis is now being used to explain diverse and unrelated events in that region, with Tehran replacing Moscow as the center of ideological subversion and military expansionism and Islam substituting for the spiritual energy of communism.
Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain. “It’s big; it’s scary; it’s anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and discontent,” wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam “spreads across vast swaths of the globe that can be colored green on the television maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red.”

NOW THIS NEXT PART IS AN AMAZING PIECE OF HONESTY (and REMEMBER, this was 1992 only MONTHS before the first WTC bombing which the brought the “threat” of “Islamic Militism” to light. Completely and utterly constructed.


The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious “sources” and unnamed officials who leak information, float trial balloons, and warn about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions taking place within government. Their information is then augmented by colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorial terrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named and other villains. The media end up finding corroboration from foreign sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S. government and help the press uncover further information substantiating the threat coming from the new bad guys.
In addition, think tanks studies and op-ed pieces add momentum to the official spin. Their publication is followed by congressional hearings, policy conferences, and public press briefings. A governmental policy debate ensues, producing studies, working papers, and eventually doctrines and policies that become part of the media’s spin. The new villain is now ready to be integrated into the popular culture to help to mobilize public support for a new crusade. In the case of the Green Peril, that process has been under way for several months.

The Israeli government and its supporters in Washington are also trying to play the Islamic card. The specter of Central Asian republics and Iran equipped with nuclear weapons helps Israel to reduce any potential international pressure on it to place its own nuclear capabilities and strategy on the negotiating table. More important, perhaps, the Green Peril could revive, in the long run, Israel’s role as America’s strategic asset, which was eroded as a result of the end of the Cold War and was seriously questioned during the Gulf War.

NOW on the specific point of the House of Saud:


As has that of Egypt and Israel, Saudi Arabia’s use of the Green Peril to mobilize U.S. support has been characterized by confusion, ironies, and paradoxes, the most dramatic of which has been the kingdom’s own commitment to Islamic fundamentalism. With the elimination of Iraq as a regional military power, the Saudi royal family, worried about the rise of Tehran as a hegemonic player in the gulf, has been fanning the anti-fundamentalist and anti-Iranian mood in Washington. The Saudis have indicated that they are interested in countering Iranian influence in Central Asia. Ironically, they are doing what they accuse Tehran of– spending lavishly to establish political and religious influence. Riyadh has spent more than $1 billion to promote the Saudi brand of Islam. Along with Egypt, Saudi Arabia has also been supporting the Somali president against a faction, supported by Iran, that is trying to overthrow him.

A series of reports about resurgent militant Islamic forces in Saudi Arabia (which also portrayed the royal family as a politically reformist regime and active supporter of the U.S.-led peace process) has been used to try to mobilize American support for the Saudis as a “moderate pillar” and anti-fundamentalist force in the gulf, the Middle East, and Central Asia.
The problem with that campaign is that the legitimacy of the Saudi regime is based on its own Islamic fundamentalist principles. The Saudi government is actually more rigid in its application of Islamic law and more repressive in many respects than the one in Tehran. For example, Saudi Arabia has no form of popular representation, and political rights are totally denied women and non-Moslems. The Saudi regime has been able to stay in power largely because it has had both direct and indirect American military support, most recently during the Gulf War. To paraphrase President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Saudis are Islamic fundamentalists–but they are our Islamic fundamentalists.

Just read that last line again! “but they are our Islamic fundamentalists”.

Full paper here: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-177.html

House of Saud: On America’s side. On Britain’s side. On the Israeli side. The WESTERN DEMOCRACY BASED IMF SIDE.
So they will supply the Wahhabi sect of “Muslim Fundamentalism” which is, in fact at the core, Zionist in nature to support the Western democratic aim to undermine the Muslim world. And how better to do that than to demonise the Muslim world by presenting them as the terrorists. THEY ARE NOT.

Just like the Irgun before them, the Mossad and their collaborators within the CIA and MI6 etc etc are doing the terrorism job on behalf of the west and the media, ignorantly mostly, supports that agenda because the people who own the media are also?….. Zionist…. and all for supporting the Western democratic agenda.

You might think “Well that suits me because I’m western and I don’t want Islam” but you are completely missing the point. The only REASON Islam is affecting you is because our own elites are creating it to ensure they get the reaction from you that they need to justify the further control of you. You are supporting your own oppression!

ADDENDUM:

Why do you think we get headlines such as this?

us-embassy-cables-saudis-iran

Sorry but “DUH!” comes to mind!

Now let’s get a further idea about the Saudis (from Wikileaks/Assange) and then we’ll take a look at Assange!

So, again, Saudis, wanted to (and want) to attack Iran – yes I understand full well the issues between shi’ite and Sunni Muslims but pardon me for making this analogy: I also understand the difference between Glasgow Celtic and Glasgow Rangers but when it’s Scotland V England or anyone else, both these “tribes” will work together to eliminate the common opposition. Simple but effective analogy I would say. You might not but I do.

Note also the fact that the Saudi Royals do not obey “their” own laws. What a surprise! Do you for one moment believe OUR political and establishment class obey ours? What do you think “Crown Immunity” is all about? Smell the coffee!

Now back to Assange. His Layer, MARK STEPHENS “believes in him and believes what he is doing is right”. Well he would wouldn’t he? Because Mark, Assange and someone else are VERY closely connected. That someone else having more power in his left pinky than an entire Army! In fact NATO and friends ARE to some degree, his left pinky!

And Stephens also says there are thousands who can release the documents? Ever given that a moment’s thought as to why? and WHO these thousands would consist of?

Assange is simply a new construct of the mainstream media because the powers that be recognise noone trust the mainstream media any longer. We KNOW they are controlled. So bring out into the spotlight a “hero” of the people who “leaks” things BUT ONLY THOSE THINGS YOU WISH TO BE LEAKED.

And when you want the destruction of governments and national sovereignty’s anyhow, what better way than to “sell” the world a leak merchant who’s “on your side”. 🙂

Oh we are SO gullible!

 

 

 

 

I MEAN TELL ME? ISN’T IT OBVIOUS TO YOU WHY ALL OF THESE “MUSLIM FUNDAMENTALISTS” GENERALLY ALL KEEP THEIR FACES WELL COVERED? DO YOU REALLY FALL FOR IT ALL?

HAS THE QUESTION NEVER EVEN OCCURRED TO YOU?

 

Advertisements

20 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] See post:  407 […]

    • HUSIN MD TAHAK said, on August 16, 2013 at 9:16 am

      WELL DONE KEEP ON EXPOSING

  2. Jeremy said, on October 27, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    Good piece and goes into areas I’ve not expanded upon myself. I find it logical considering the historical links of the Semitic peoples that the Saudi’s ties to the Jews may be biological and that they share common ancestory, and it seems, if you are correct, common ideologies.

    I would not consider the Saudi’s and the Israeli’s to be arch enemy even if they have warred in the past (are we arch enemies with the Irish?). Certainly in recent times I would consider Israel and Saudi Arabia to be allies rather than foes. As we know the Saudi’s had the opportunity to change history by cutting oil supplies to the West in protest at \israeli statehood but they didn’t. Why I wonder?

    I have long been interested in why the democratic west supports a dictatorship in the middle east, especially after they deposed the democratic govt of Iran in ’53. Obviously a co-operatve dictatorship is better in our eyes than an unco-operative democracy!? Of course, if that dictatorship supports Zionism then that would go a long way to explaining it.

    I haven’t finished reading the full paper fom the CATO institute yet but will and get back to you

  3. samah said, on October 28, 2010 at 7:25 am

    I do not agree with you in this talk with my thanks to you too!!
    Wahhabism has existed for several years And will not find any terrorist act carried out by one of its followers But what happened in the 9-11 And we all know that this act of …masterminding the Mossad The Wahhabi sect is just stick to what it was the predecessor of the Muslims and if it has some tightening, but it is not reliable to terrorism in any way That unlike some Arab countries with Iran is just a doctrinal dispute only they are the understanding of Shia and Arabs most of them Sunni, And all the Arabs supported Saddam Hussein in his war against Iran is not only Saudi Arabia And this is normal … all of them are Sunni Arabs and the enemy is Shiite Persian (of course with the interceptor on the classification of Islam to Shiite and Sunni, but I am talking from thier point of view)Iran,is a Muslim country, but it has ambitions are well known to every one to control of the Arabian Gulf (Or the Persian Gulf, as they call it) And Iran’s interference in Iraqi affairs are proof of this .As for the words of King Faisal God’s mercy be upon him And in which he says that the Jews are our cousins. he does not mean only his family! he means all the Arabs because the Arabs and the Jews are the sons of Sam son of Noah .King Faisal that God’s mercy be upon him was one of the most supporters of the Palestinian cause and the most supporters of the Egyptian army and Arab in its fight against the Zionists, and this is the biggest proof of the error of this report, which glorifies and Iran is bad for the Arabs Despite the existence of Israel in the Arab land since more than sixty years have not heard of any fighting launched by Iran on Israel! Do not hear but only hollow statements,
    I’m here I do not deny responsibility for the Arab rulers, no doubt they are weak in front of their enemy, but I also do not trust Iran because its relationship with the Zionists more exciting to doubt

    • Kevin Lan said, on January 25, 2014 at 10:41 pm

      Your comment based on very shallow and misguided…. stop watching TV you are poisoning your mind..

  4. Ahmed said, on February 10, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    Interesting Article,,,
    How can we view the British War Museum records about Al Saud Family roots that link to Jewish or Zionist??

    • earthlinggb said, on February 11, 2011 at 12:36 am

      Don’t know the answer to that one Ahmed. I’ve just studied enough to recognise it is substantially factual and true.

  5. Lhk said, on February 25, 2011 at 5:23 pm

    Very interesting search-post. I wish I could dig more into your information. Catching enough, it has logic and more and more read about it on different blogs. By trying to understand what is going on in the Middle East, now, I went to my Daily Bell reading were they, like you, expose this elements of the PE and did a web search and run into this very interesting piece…I find myself into a strange dimension, where what it used to be is the opposite. I will keep searching onto this topic. Thanks for your input in the matter.

    • earthlinggb said, on February 26, 2011 at 5:58 pm

      Glad you got something out of it Lhk. I just wish the entire country would understand these things. We’d have a different world if they did.

  6. TK said, on February 26, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    Can i Subscribe

    • earthlinggb said, on February 26, 2011 at 5:56 pm

      Sure. Go ahead. Add some friends. The more the merrier. 🙂

  7. L. said, on March 11, 2011 at 4:07 am

    good site ! thx

    http://lupocattivoblog.wordpress.com/category/english-articels/

    (german blog, but u can find some english articels)

  8. David Levy said, on March 23, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    The entire crux of Earthlings blog rests on the premise that the House of Saud is of Jewish origin and therefore obviously Zionist

    SO let’s examine Earthling’s evidence and see if they match the claims

    The first piece of evidence
    Washington Post King FAISAL 1969:
    “WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.”

    King FAISAL did not say the Saud Family he said the Saudi family as in the Saudi nation.

    Now anyone with even the slightest bit of knowledge about Islam and Judaism knows about the story of Abraham (or Ibrahim Jews and Christians) and that both people claim him as the patriarch to their people.
    “Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world”

    It was to this relationship that King FAISAL was referring. He did not claim close relation but that of cousin. Muslim’s traditionally call each other brothers or sisters thus the Jews are once removed ie cousins.

    The other part of the story- an I don’t think King FAISAL was referring to this- is the racial composition of Israel.

    Israel is essentially another Arab country- in fact it is the 23th Arab country.

    Between 1880 and 1949 over ±1 250 000 Jews fled the Arab countries- the vast majority of these Arab Jews fled after 1948. The contract of dhimmitude had been broken with the establishment of the Jewish state and thus Jewish lives throughout the Islamic world were unprotected and thus forfeit.

    Of the ±1 250 000 Arab Jews that fled Arab lands 850 000 decided to resettle in the reclaimed Jewish land of Israel.

    The descendants of those 850 000 Arab Jews now account for over half of the Jewish citizens of Israel- and by the way it is those Arab Jews who most venomously oppose reconciliation with the Arab neighbours- this is due to the very long memory of the 1400 years of brutal subjugation as they suffered as Dhimmi at the hands of their “cousins”

    The second piece of evidence
    That one of the ancestors of the House of Saud was Jewish in that Mordakhai Bin Ibrihim Bin Moshe was Jewish and that he changed his name to Markhan Bin Ibrahim Musa.
    ———————–

    Firstly the claim is one of the ancestors- not a founding father or patriarch- just an ancestor

    Historically speaking it’s impossible to imagine any Muslim ever accepting the authority of a non-Muslim as Islamic Sharia laws expressly forbid it.

    Specifically it would be impossible for a non-Muslim to lead a Muslim tribe. There is no historical precedent and as such we need to consider how this could have happened – if it did…

    Islamic scholars recorded in great detail the treatment meted out to the Dhimma (non-Muslim class)

    Several hundred years of Islamic thought on the right treatment of dhimmi peoples is summed up by Al-Damanhuri, a seventeenth century head of Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the most prestigious centre for learning in the Muslim world:

    … just as the dhimmis are prohibited from building churches, other things also are prohibited to them. They must not assist an unbeliever against a Muslim … raise the cross in an Islamic assemblage … display banners on their own holidays; bear arms … or keep them in their homes. Should they do anything of the sort, they must be punished, and the arms seized. … The Companions [of the Prophet] agreed upon these points in order to demonstrate the abasement of the infidel and to protect the weak believer’s faith. For if he sees them humbled, he will not be inclined toward their belief, which is not true if he sees them in power, pride, or luxury garb, as all this urges him to esteem them and incline toward them, in view of his own distress and poverty. Yet esteem for the unbeliever is unbelief. (Al-Damanhuri, quoted in Bat Ye’or, The Decline of Eastern Christianity under Islam, 382.)

    In other words the laws of the Dhimmi where part of a process that intentionally reduced non-Muslims to a subservient state of poverty. Christians in Pakistan are colloquially known as Street sweepers as that is the only type of work that they are allowed to do

    Because of this what was once Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian lands (Syria, Palestine, Judea, Jordan, Iraq Egypt) gradually where forced to convert to Islam so as to escape the oppressive laws and taxes.

    Those that were and are strong in faith didn’t convert but have been reduced to poverty

    This process has been so successful that the Middle East is almost 100% Muslim and almost 100% Arab- thus extinguishing the earlier Christian, Jewish and pagan cultures and the original races that lived there

    When those of weaker faith converted to Islam the dropped their old names and adopted Muslim names- as do converts today.

    As I said It is impossible to imagine any Muslim accepting the authority of a non-Muslim. But once that man or women had converted he would be accepted into the Muslims tribes and be able to marry, study, join the priesthood or just about anything- even lead a Arab tribe.

    But to do this he would have to be a true Muslim Hanifa- nothing less would be accepted by his fellow Muslims

    This accusation against the House of Saud shows the absolute paranoia in the Muslim world about being in any way associated with Judaism. During the recent Arab uprising both Mubarak and Gaddafi where portrayed as Jews by the islamists protesters. Calling a Muslim a Jew in the Muslim world is a very serious insult

    The third piece of evidence
    In the 1960’s the “Sawt Al Arab” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the Saudi Family ” – James Matthew Cantu
    This third piece of evidence flows from the first piece and therefore isn’t a separate piece of evidence

    Are we now to take as the gospel truth every single radio news broadcast? Earthling seems to think it’s a GREAT idea. I would like to think that intelligent people think a bit more critically and absorb a bit less propaganda.

    The Yemeni broadcast I suspect has more to do with the Yemini Civil war (1968 -1970) where the Saudi intervene and thus were considered and enemy by some Yemeni

    The Egyptians on the other hand are the largest Arab nation and for centuries have seen themselves as the leaders of the Arab world. Any attempt to discredit the Leaders of their main rival- the House of Saud- would be well received by the Egyptian government

    Conclusion
    Earthlings so called evidence is non-existent. It’s a quilt work of half-baked conspiracy theories that are very well tied together- I’ll give him credit for that- but still false.

    Earthlings biggest mistake is that he doesn’t understand the history and culture of either the Jews or the Muslims and yet tries to draw both of these groups into elaborate fantasies

    Its akin to a blind man attempting heart surgery

    What I find so comical about Earthlings Blog is how his racism seeps into his writing. It’s a given that Earthling hates Jews- he has admitted it. What I was surprised about is how racist his view of Arabs and Muslims are

    He spins this story about this massive con where he supposedly reveals that the House of Saud is Jewish and how does he tell us the Jews get away with this massive Con?

    Earthling: “They [the Muslims] know as much (generally speaking) about the history of their country and the history of their religion and politics as we do. Perhaps less because they are so controlled and conditioned.”

    Aaahh so they are fooled because they are ignorant about their History, their Race, their Culture, their Land and most importantly their Religion

    But the arrogance of Earthling doesn’t stop there. He says that they actually know less than us about their history

    Who’s us?

    Europeans?

    Westerners?

    Left wing conspiracy nuts?

    The Saudi people are one of the most religious and proud people in the world. The Saudi Islamic Scholars are some of the best theological scholars in the world and whilst they lack the western focus on critical exanimation as they put a religious spin on everything there is no chance that that are in any way ignorant about their history and their religion.

    Your arrogance is astounding

    Next time choose a subject you actually know something about

    • earthlinggb said, on March 23, 2011 at 9:38 pm

      SO let’s examine Earthling’s evidence and see if they match the claims
      The first piece of evidence
Washington Post King FAISAL 1969:
“WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.”
      King FAISAL did not say the Saud Family he said the Saudi family as in the Saudi nation.

      Reply: I suggest you consider this – It is King Faisal of Saudi Arabia speaking. As such, he would never even think of saying “some Saudi citizens would disagree with me”. He is the King and by god, particularly under a regime like that, he is going to emphasise HIS word as being HIS Kingdom’s word.
      Please also note how specific he was: “We the SAUDI family” not “We Muslims”. That in itself puts paid to your argument regarding the jews and muslims having Abraham as their “Fountainhead”. It is true but it is not what Faisal referred to as you are attempting to suggest.
      How many times have you heard our government and our Queen speak on OUR behalf? They do it every time they attack a country. They speak of “the British people” even though, re Iraq for example (and even the polls re Libya today) a majority of the BRITISH PEOPLE are against our government’s actions!
      I suggest, then, that covers that issue more than sufficiently. Your powers of logic and balanced assessment are somewhat wanting Mr LEVY!

      Now anyone with even the slightest bit of knowledge about Islam and Judaism knows about the story of Abraham (or Ibrahim Jews and Christians) and that both people claim him as the patriarch to their people.
“Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world”
      It was to this relationship that King FAISAL was referring. He did not claim close relation but that of cousin. Muslim’s traditionally call each other brothers or sisters thus the Jews are once removed ie cousins.

      Correct but, within the totality of the points raised surrounding it within the blog, it is used as simply another pointer. Meanwhile, please do not assume something as basic as Abraham and his connection to both religions is unknown to the author. To write the history of such (and consider every other thread which may go off at a tangent) would require a voluminous book on the subject. I leave that to the reader to decide if they wish to pursue it further. This point you make has absolutely no bearing on the issue of whether the Wahhabi sect, through Emir Mohammed ibn Saud and his son Abd el-Aziz. They had embraced Wahhabism and had entered into an alliance with Abd el-Wahhab in 1774 which is historical documented fact.

      As for your point ” Israel is essentially another Arab country- in fact it is the 23th Arab country.” while I see absolutely no relevance in such a statement, I would further suggest you state that to an Israeli jew and see the reaction you get.

      “Between 1880 and 1949 over ±1 250 000 Jews fled the Arab countries- the vast majority of these Arab Jews fled after 1948. The contract of dhimmitude had been broken with the establishment of the Jewish state and thus Jewish lives throughout the Islamic world were unprotected and thus forfeit.
      Of the ±1 250 000 Arab Jews that fled Arab lands 850 000 decided to resettle in the reclaimed Jewish land of Israel.
      The descendants of those 850 000 Arab Jews now account for over half of the Jewish citizens of Israel- and by the way it is those Arab Jews who most venomously oppose reconciliation with the Arab neighbours- this is due to the very long memory of the 1400 years of brutal subjugation as they suffered as Dhimmi at the hands of their “cousins”

      Reply: We are wandering off topic again to an extent but I shall entertain you. You may wish to read the following account of things with regard to the Arab Jews displacement:
      “Second, although historians are agreed that the Palestinians were expelled by Israel in 1948, there is little evidence that most Arab Jews were forced from their homes.
      According to the Israeli historian Avi Shlaim, whose family left Baghdad in 1950, most of these Jewish migrants left of their own accord, even if under pressure from Zionist agencies. The largest numbers came from Morocco, lured to Israel by Zionist officials who promised them a better life.
      Only in the case of the small Jewish populations in Egypt and Libya was compulsion involved.
      And third, and most embarrassing for Israel, there is overwhelming evidence that its secret Mossad agency carried out false-flag operations in Arab countries that endangered local Jews and significantly contributed to the exodus.
      The involvement of Israel in bombing campaigns in both Egypt and Baghdad – and possibly elsewhere – is mentioned, for example, in the diaries of Moshe Sharrett, the former prime minister. The explosions were designed, in his words, to “liven up the Middle East.”
      http://antiwar.com/orig/cook.php?articleid=13845

      “The second piece of evidence
That one of the ancestors of the House of Saud was Jewish in that Mordakhai Bin Ibrihim Bin Moshe was Jewish and that he changed his name to Markhan Bin Ibrahim Musa.
———————–
      Firstly the claim is one of the ancestors- not a founding father or patriarch- just an ancestor”

      Let me be clearer then on the “Ancestor” and state that he is considered as the Patriarch of the Saud family having had numerous polygamist relationships and many children who went on to become the Saud family.
      THIS HAPPENS TO BE THE ONE SINGLE POINT THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO SAY, WITH ANY JUSTIFICATION (albeit minimal because you have not provided a confirmable alternative or ANY alternative!) MAY NOT BE CORRECT. I EMPHASISE “MAY” SIMPLY BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER DISPROVING IT. You would think there would be!! If you ever find such then please let me know.

      “Historically speaking it’s impossible to imagine any Muslim ever accepting the authority of a non-Muslim as Islamic Sharia laws expressly forbid it.
      Specifically it would be impossible for a non-Muslim to lead a Muslim tribe. There is no historical precedent and as such we need to consider how this could have happened”

      Reply: Can we just be clear here! We are speaking of infiltration here – or is that concept just a little too difficult for you to grasp? Additionally, the Wahhabis instigated JIHAD against Muslims for goodness sakes so, somehow, I think the muslims weren’t quite happy with the teachings of the wahhabis!
      There were various tribes within the region and the Wahhabis’ modus operandi was to coalesce these tribes into one UNDER the austere Wahhabi teachings which Muslims DID NOT accept!
      “For the next forty years or so, their followers waged a stubborn struggle for the unification of Nejd under the banner of Wahhabism. They conquered one principality after the other. They forced the Bedouin tribes into submission. Some villages willingly submitted to the Wahhabis, others were driven on to the “path of truth” by force of arms.”Formally all the Arabs were Moslems. But, in reality, there existed many local tribal religions in Arabia. Each Arab tribe, each village had its fetish, its beliefs and rites. The variety of religious forms that stemmed from the primitive level of social development and the lack of cohesion between the countries of Arabia were serious obstacles to political unity. Abd el-Wahhab set up against this religious polymorphism a single doctrine called tauhid (unity). Formally, he did not desire a change in the doctrines of Islam, but merely preached a return to Islam’s former purity as proclaimed in the Koran. “Mohammed’s religious revolution, like every religious movement, was formally a reaction, an alleged return to the old, the simple,” Engels wrote of the origin of Islam. [Marx and Engels, Selected Correspondence, p. 79.] Abd el-Wahhab’s “religious revolution” was also “an alleged return to the old, the simple.” But the meaning of the “revolution” lay not so much in a new interpretation of the tenets of Islam as in an appeal for Arab unity.The teachings of the Wahhabis were devoted mainly to questions of morals. Its followers, who had grown up in the rigorous conditions of desert life, had to observe a strict moral austerity bordering on asceticism. They were forbidden to drink wine or coffee or to smoke tobacco. They rejected all luxury and forbade singing or the playing of musical instruments. They spoke out against all overindulgence and sexual dissoluteness. It is no wonder, therefore, that the Wahhabis were called “the Puritans of the desert.”The Wahhabis fought against the survivals of local tribal cults. They destroyed the tombs of the saints, and forbade magic fortune-telling. But at the same time their teachings were directed against official Islam. They denounced mysticism and dervishism, the forms of religious worship practised by the Turks and formed over the ages. They urged the people to fight mercilessly against the apostates, in other words, against the Persian Shi’as, the Ottoman pseudo-Caliph and the Turkish pashas. The Wahhabis intended to drive out the Turks and unite the liberated Arab countries under the banner of “pure Islam.”
      Taken from: “Modern History of the Arab Countries. Vladimir Borisovich Lutsky 1969”

      So regarding the rest of your religious thesis and the dhimmis etc, I’m afraid it is all fluff and of absolutely no consequence on this issue. You are still in the realms of there being some form of homogeneous Islam where there is not even a homogeneous Judaism Mr LEVY!

      Your last point before you go off on the usual zionist style rant and ad hominem attack based on assumption of the author is as follows:

      “Conclusion
Earthlings so called evidence is non-existent. It’s a quilt work of half-baked conspiracy theories that are very well tied together- I’ll give him credit for that- but still false.”

      Reply: You have narrowly focused in on basically ONE aspect of the entire blog. An aspect, nevertheless, which has evidence associated with it. Evidence is not PROOF. Just as in a court of law, there may be EVIDENCE but it may be insufficient for purposes of a conviction. I entirely accept that, in relation to the single focus you have placed on one single element of the entire blog, that evidence, in of itself, is insufficient. I would, however, argue strongly that the rest of the pieces building up the picture regarding how Saudis have conducted themselves and the various quotes and paragraphs coming from the likes of Roosevelt, The CATO institute, Brzezinski’s “Grand Chessboard”, the strange anomaly that while it was mainly saudis who are alleged to have hijacked the 9/11 planes yet the evidence is flowing in that, in fact, it was Israel who carried out 9/11 along with others, neither of these countries were pointed the finger at whatsoever. It is the interlinking of all of these aspects which, I believe, would give any sane individual with no axe to grind, pause for some serious thought. EXCEPT, perhaps for you MR LEVY!

      You may wish to consider the following segments of British Parliamentary records regarding both, the Wahhabis advancement and take over of Saudi Arabia, Mecca etc and, further, subsidies paid to Arab Rulers by the British government using British taxes while the rulers fought amongst themselves.
      The Hejaz:
      http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1922/jul/05/the-hejaz

      Subsidies paid to Arab Rulers by British taxes:
      http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1922/mar/02/arab-rulers-subsidies#S5CV0151P0_19220302_HOC_159

      Penultimate point: I allowed your comment simply because while I do not appreciate your tone nor your inferences, I can see you made some attempt to hold back the personal attack element. It must have been hard for you. Unlike your previous comment which went unpublished due to such attack and due to zero attempts to justify your argument. Your argument STILL lacks any substance however but, where possible, I do not wish to censor because my MO is to research and, if I find strong evidence which leads me to a contrary conclusion then I shall embrace it. Provide such and I shall only be too happy to publish it.

      Final point: There is no racism in my writing. I have lived globally and had friendships and associations with a substantial number of various ethnicities, nationalities and religions. The whole point of my referring to myself as “Earthling” is that I see us ALL as simply that.
      I have made statements about despising zionists (which is not in any shape or form a RACE). It is akin to the west despising Communists (as they ignorantly referred to the USSR as) for decades. I also despise Fabians. In fact, I can state categorically, that I despise ANY and ALL political and quasi religious “movements” whose agenda is to transform and manipulate society as THEY see fit and for THEIR purposes.
      I have also stated I despise jews. I may, at this point, emphasise that I make such a statement in general and sweeping terms to show my utter disdain for those jews (and I may add to that, Christian zionists and Fundamental Islamists and any other extremist interests) who do not stand up and speak out against this insiduous zionist menace and who, many times as I have encountered, have a superiority complex founded on the deluded basis that they are “God’s chosen”. THAT is the racism Mr Levy. To hold yourself above the rest of the human race in such a fashion is downright, sickening racism to the core. Not only that, the multitude of white jews who cling to this belief come from a race of European ancestry who, themselves, originate in Khazaria Russia and NOT semite peoples whatsoever. So please, before throwing your accusations, consider the soundness of your assumptions Mr LEVY!

      • Harris said, on November 1, 2012 at 10:26 am

        I liked David Levy’s reply or reaction (as we may put it). A lot of ignorance!! the one that really got my attention was:

        “The Saudi people are one of the most religious and proud people in the world. The Saudi Islamic Scholars are some of the best theological scholars in the world and whilst they lack the western focus on critical exanimation as they put a religious spin on everything there is no chance that that are in any way ignorant about their history and their religion.”

        Get your facts together – That’s all i got say.

        This Guy has no idea what he is speakin’ about. Dont mug up some “wahabi” book and write your nonsense based on that.

        GOOD WORK earthlinggb!! keep it coming.

      • Kevin Lan said, on January 25, 2014 at 10:36 pm

        I salute you……. respect.

  9. Asfora said, on June 1, 2011 at 1:15 pm

    There is an article here about The Quranist’s Role in Combatting Islamic Fundamentalism which I think you might find relevant and interesting.

  10. jayampathi de silva said, on June 17, 2012 at 4:26 am

    some time ago i viewed an YouTube video from net that one of lebanon historian saying that the Wahhabi s are secret jews who want to get revenge the killing of jews by mohamadian forces in the early 6-7 century in mecca,Medina and else where in saudi arabia.further he said that in the name of pure islam they destroy all saudi islam artifacts,tombs,and all historical buildings in that country.even they destroyed Mohammed’s immediately family members tombs and they trying to destroy the Mohammed tomb too!
    iam happy if you know about this video and publish here.
    pl also clarify whether above facts are true.
    one thing, there are rumors spreading all over, that large population of ethnically jews( may be millions ) are still existing in saudi arabia, deeply hidden inside islam! in remote areas of saudi arabia who secretly practicing their own religion with the knowledge of authorities!
    all these facts has to be examine by an independent panel.

  11. wiki-paesaggio.arc.uniroma1.it said, on May 6, 2013 at 9:16 am

    Undeniably imagine that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed
    to be at the web the easiest factor to have in mind of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed whilst people think about concerns that they just do not recognise about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and defined
    out the whole thing with no need side-effects , other people could
    take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thanks

  12. ibrahim itace said, on January 11, 2014 at 1:37 pm

    the wicked people (jews and christians) plot to undermine islam through wahhabism that gave rise to alqaeda, boko haram and other destructive groups . but their plots will soon go back to them as it has started on sept 11.the jews did the same plot during the time of noble prophet and it paid back to them where they were expelled from arabia for treachery. since jews are human satan allah will destroy them all as they did to amaleks


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: