IF POLITICIANS, BARRISTERS AND THE JUDICIARY WERE PROPERTY, THEY’D ALL BE IN NEGATIVE EQUITY!
THAT IS HOW VALUABLE THESE PEOPLE ARE TO SOCIETY!
But when people of this country begin to see mothers throwing themselves in front of lorries because they “can’t AFFORD to live anymore”, you and that corrupt, legislating, criminal government you work for (not just you tories but also labour and LibDem – all of you feeding off the people of this country while you protect the very banks and corporations who cause this misery by legislating on their behalf in a fundamentally corrupt deception called a “monetary system”) may well see a Britain that you never could imagine could have existed.
Now, I have come to a point where I’ve had more than enough of the bullshit you and your legislators, and the judiciary which enforces it, call “law” as each of you pass the “hot potato” between each other – the MP can’t interfere with the judiciary and the judiciary turns and says “we don’t make the law, the MPs/legislators do”. While, as I hope you are well aware, I’m one of the “intelligent ones”. I’ve spent 30 years in a career Damian. I’ve hit the heights of a six figure salary. I’ve travelled the world and I’ve got the education. Many (too many) have not. It is these who will resort to violence on an epic scale because, let me explain something to you: The information highway is immense in its structure and its also immense in its capability to inform and to educate. Whereas, unlike before in earlier times, people did not have instant access to information which contradicted the propaganda of which you are a part, they do now and there are mountains of it. People are learning the abject corruption and bullshit that you people prop up.
Well, it’s you and your colleagues’ actions in parliament who are setting this scenario up. You’re not backing down. You’re afraid to speak truth to power. You’re impotent. Meanwhile Mr Ustych and his barrister colleagues are either so lacking in empathy on the whole with those who have not shared their backgrounds (Yes Alex, I gave my kids what you had and did the “expatriate experience” like your father but there is a difference – I maintained the connection with my origins and I achieved it entirely off my own back – creating that value in my “person” which the banks then obfuscate and assume as theirs) or are simply too scared to rock the boat because they may lose their juicy little career.
All of this made me learn what it is that is so wrong. My point of writing to you (however bluntly) is this: YOU can learn what is so wrong too if you are at all willing to “drop” the ego of your positions and your “capacities” – i.e. Damian Green the MP and Alex Ustych the Barrister at law (who swear an oath to the Crown which you both do).
So read this open letter I penned to the son of a woman who has felt it necessary to take her own life because she felt she could not afford to live and then click on the link to the “New Economy” and educate yourselves. Then recognise that it is YOU (and only you) who can put a stop to this by your willingness to grasp, interpret, recognise and acknowledge it. Then DO something about it! It is YOU who can turn this deception and corruption around.
Now, I FULLY expect you to read this. If neither of you choose to do so or you respond with some kind of dismissive bullshit, then I know full well where you both stand. The problem with you acknowledging this is that it takes balls in your positions. You know it would “upset the applecart” and, to be frank, I’m not sure either one of you have those balls. I would, however, be pleasantly surprised to be proven wrong and would be gracious enough to acknowledge it. But then that is entirely up to you.
Here is the letter/blog. The explanation of that new economy – which is so very simple – is linked to the letter.
Both of you can decide to turn over a new leaf and, if you have any empathy for people at all, take action of some sort (any sort) which brings this to the attention of your peers. If you need help in doing so, I stand ready to provide it. If you and your peers worry about my lack of “respect” for you then that is so easily fixed: You earn that respect by showing to this country what you are really made of. I am more than willing to discuss/debate in a respectful manner (while this is not disrespectful as I see it, just blunt between men. You are at liberty to be just as blunt) but my long experience of dealing with your colleagues has me recognise the obfuscation, deception and pure outright lies that are wrapped in pleasant language. I just don’t play that game guys!
Now, how about you both begin that journey and take action in my case to do the right thing? That right thing, I have no doubt, is hard to do but, right now, while you can both see clearly the wrong here, you just don’t have the willingness to try that bit harder do you? For example, one letter from you Alex and you just cite percentages while you can see clearly the wrong. If you can see it and you say the courts won’t then you know something is wrong. And it is not only you who can clearly recognise it. The question is: Are you a “Hunter” or a “farmer” (in Sales speak). The hunter changes things and stirs things up while the farmer just grazes and takes the salary. The same goes for you Damian? Which are you?
Best Regards guys.
Subject: RE: Referral to LawWorks
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:27:23 +0000
Dear Mr xxxxxx,
Thank you for your email and the attachments.
I understand from the subsequent emails you have copied to me that in fact the Pro Bono Unit is still considering whether you qualify for free legal advice, and is looking at the detailed points you have made to them. In the circumstances I think it is best to wait to see what their final decision is.
Sent: 24 April 2013 13:28
To: GREEN, Damian
Subject: FW: Referral to LawWorks
Dear Mr Green,
I apologise for the bluntness but is this what I worked for over a period of about 5 months to achieve?
One letter from a Barrister from Pro Bono and then he gives up on a case which CLEARLY, the other party admits to having breached contract?
If this is so, then I would ask you to form a question to be raised in Parliament regarding this type of thing. It would seem clear, time and again, that the law as it exists at this point, does nothing to support it’s promotion of the idea that ALL legal persons are equal before it. Nor, it seems, does it reflect the so called “equity” of law it promotes.
MPs may state that one must pursue their respective issues through the courts BUT the big issue is this: The courts simply enforce the policy which you, the parliamentarians and legislation framers, create. That “law” is not equitable – not by a long shot – and this is becoming clearer and clearer as every day passes.
Mr Green, I can choose to rely on my MP to try and remedy what is clearly wrong, or I can choose to consider my MP who reads all of this, understands what is going on here, but simply says “I can’t do anything”. If it were the latter then I would ask “What is it that MPs are there to do for their constituents?
This company has brought me to the precipice of bankruptcy. THAT is a fact and it is a fact (and morality) which it is clearly seen they simply do not care about. They are flaunting the fact they breached the contract but are simply laughing saying to me and a Barrister “What precisely do you propose doing about it?”. Do you know how they can achieve this? How they can simply laugh and walk away while destroying a man’s livelihood even though having promised him something that he, in good faith and belief, acted upon to his detriment? Because you and your colleagues have allowed them to do so through your legislation.
Mr Ustych, while a Barrister, is impotent to achieve anything because he is entirely boxed in by the legislation (“law”) created by you and your colleagues. Yet you (as a group of parliamentarians) advise us we must plead to a court which you have stifled from being able to apply equitable law to so many people’s cases. The more financially strong “legal person” beats the less strong “legal person” every time. That is not law Mr Green. There is nothing which reflects “Alll persons are equal before the law” here.
No matter where one turns, the door gets shut. Thanks to British justice and the British Parliament.
I have not heard from LawWorks.
Meanwhile, Mr Ustych wrote a Letter before claim for me to Xcel’s solicitors (attached) and it has been replied to. Copies are attached.
Mr Ustych has advised me that there is somewhat less than a 50% chance of my winning a case if I brought it before court. I do not fully understand how this is so since the company has admitted Breach of Contract and, it can be seen clearly that, contrary to their assertions it is clear, once more, from Mr Weller’s email response, that he did, in fact vary the contract.
The contradictions within their most recent letter to me are plain to see.
It’s like this: There was a contract between two legal persons. Legal persons are equal before the law. I am asserting my right to sue them on that basis. The fundamentals of this are clear and cannot be refuted. That said, it is only the figure which is awarded to me which is in question. A court could not possibly find the other party to be correct or in the clear. To do so would be a miscarriage of justice. I have spoken with Mr Ustych, other solicitors (before having the assistance of Mr Ustych) and even one of the Directors in Xcel; All of which clearly see the wrong which has been done in this case. It is not difficult to see!
Now, it is unacceptable to me that I am then told I have less than 50% chance of winning this case.
This company made a promise. They did not hold to that promise while it is clearly seen that I acted upon that promise to the tune of £40,000 of cash reserves. Yes, it MAY have been invested in a property but that was the entire basis of the waiving of the probationary period and the promise! Not only that, while I am told “But you have not lost that £40,000″. I have! I am now at a point (having been unable to finance my mortgage of £1000 per month by way of salaries) that my savings have dwindled to a point I will have to sell my home! Doing so, I am locked in to a 5 year mortgage and will have to pay penalties of approx £10,00 or more when I sell. This means I shall then have no income and far less savings than I had prior to accepting the contract with Xcel. When I come to sell my home, I will then be unable to buy another (of course – having no income and, if I am lucky, about £10,000 of savings). Further, it is unlikely that I will even be able to rent (considering landlords wish to see that one is solvent with an income). Xcel’s solicitors keep referring to my argument being a moral one rather than a legal one. Indeed it is moral (It would seem Xcel have none then since it doesn’t seem to be an issue for them) but while it is moral it is also LEGAL. I am not taking a statutory view on this (as I have stated time and time again). There is the law of equity. It is quite abundantly clear and any judge applying such law (as I would demand they do) would simply have to acknowledge that equity has not been reached in this case. Now, I would like to hear someone’s full acknowledgement and appreciation of this fact. Once so, I would then expect the law to do as it should – rebalance it!
It is abundantly clear, from all Xcel’s communications, that they admit they did not stick to contract. It does not matter that they say they have paid out according to one month’s notice because that obscures the fact that they did so having breached the contractual terms in the first place. I wish to know whether there is a Barrister (or solicitor in LawWorks) who clearly see the wrong/tort in all of this (as I know Mr Ustych does) and is willing to represent, effectively, my case in court. Or is it simply the case that if any solicitor or Barrister feels that a case has less than a 50% chance of winning, they do not take it on? If so, then HERE is the problem with that: Why do ANY cases go before court? Because, if one party says “Ok we have a better than 50% chance so we will go to court” then, assuming competence on the part of the other party’s solicitors (and we have to assume all Barristers and Solicitors are competent do we not?), the other party will back down because they must obviously have LESS than 50% chance.
Doesn’t Mr Ustych (or any Barrister) think that it is possible that that assessment of less than 50% is just a measure of their belief in their own capability to argue effectively? Also, do they not consider the possibility that, at the point where the other party gets nervous at the thought of going to court, the closer that day gets, the more likely they would think of coming to some settlement?
Lastly, I wrote 3 letters to Xcel and their solicitors and all were dismissed by them. Mr Ustych (a Barrister) writes ONE letter and it is dismissed (and in parts described as absurd) by them. Mr Ustych then suggests there is nothing more he can do? His considered opinion as a Barrister is slated by a solicitor and that’s all the Bar Pro Bono section can do or achieve? I ask myself, would it be different if a solicitor or Barrister was being paid by me?? Is that it?
Sorry for being so candid but should I seriously be impressed?
I am, therefore, asking for further advice from the Pro Bono section and solid advice which actually achieves something. This is not a game where we roll a dice and give something a punt to see what happens!
Subject: Referral to LawWorks
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:32:28 +0100
BY EMAIL ONLY
Mr xxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx
Our ref: xxxxxx/13/0124
2 April 2013
Dear Mr xxxxx,
Re Mr xxxx xxxxx v XCEL Power Systems Ltd
Further to your emails, I do apologise for the delay in referring your case to LawWorks. This letter confirms that I have referred your case to LawWorks’ Individual Casework Scheme.
Once LawWorks has received your case, they will be in contact with you directly.
Please note that LawWorks can only assist in some cases and there is no guarantee that they will be able to assist in your case.
Should you need to contact LawWorks before you hear from them, their details are as follows:
National Pro Bono Centre
48 Chancery Lane
Tel: 020 092 3940
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me,
Direct line 0207 092 3962
Address: Bar Pro Bono Unit, The National Pro Bono Centre, 48 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1JF
Who are Xcel? A company with a Managing Director by the name of Richard Weller, who waived a probationary period of employment (proven) and were sufficiently happy with one’s performance that Mr Weller waived it and advised that one could, comfortably and with his assurance, purchase a house which meant the laying down of approx £40K of savings. One, then, had a £5K monthly income from the employment to pay the mortgage which is over £1K per month. Within 2 to 3 months after making this statement, Mr Weller, out of the blue with no justification of any kind and no notice, decided to terminate one’s employment. Leaving one to pay one’s mortgage from one’s now much smaller level of savings and no income.
I repeat once more – NO REASON and the company and Mr Weller have had many opportunities given to them to state the reason – any justification whatsoever – and they have refused point blank. They have admitted a breach of contract (which it is) and while there are many other legal points – such as estoppel – for which damages may be claimed, the above Barrister states he believes there is less than 50% chance of winning!
So, I will leave you with this. It is only my opinion and I have an absolute right to my opinion as he does to his. In my opinion, this man is an incompetent businessman (and I have good reason for this not just sour grapes I assure you), he also seems to enjoy jokes in Directors’ meetings about the possibility of a war with Iran resulting in more business for the company (he tends, then, to ignore the human casualties of such a war while he profits) and lastly, I would never trust the man as far as I could throw him. His word seems not to be his bond.
Defamation is non justified statements (which you used son in your termination letter to me). Defamation is not a statement of fact or of a justifiable opinion.
I have decided just to publish this as a blog because I have no expectation of this email actually being answered in any significant way (if at all) by Sir Peter Tapsell. To reply appropriately and honestly would be more than his head’s worth (nevermind his job).
I simply found his comments in 993 Parliamentary Archives intriguing regarding the Maastrict treaty. Reading them now, I look in amazement at someone who seems to almost be naive in their position yet incapability (it would appear) to understand what is going on at the time. He SURELY understands now! But it is, again, one of the “establishment” and by god, as one of them he would not wish to put his head on the block by acknowledging the reality of any of this:
From: Earthling To: email@example.com Subject: U.N. Articles and Declaration of Human Rights & Thomas Paine Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 22:17:23 +0000
I have always thought that one of the redeeming features of the Rome treaty is that it did not seek to regulate financial matters. That has permitted the enormous increase in the volume of international financial business which has taken place in the City of London during the 35 years that I have worked in those markets, and has enabled that increase to take place without being hindered in any way by Brussels.
PC Fineman entered the force in 2004. His career in Law Enforcement was a stellar one as he was headhunted by every division in the UK. This guy was a “Revenue monster” and his CV read like a Policy Enforcer’s dream!
PC Fineman didn’t give a moment’s thought to what Law actually was. That wasn’t his business. That was for the judges and lawyers. He knew that all the Dun and Bradstreet listed Police divisions were now in competition with each other and each of them wanted the best! Well, Fineman WAS the best! And he knew it!
In his first year on the job, PC Fineman went to the top of his division’s revenue generation league tables within 6 months of commencement. If there was a buck to be made, he made it – whether that was putting in the overtime hours, sitting with his donuts on the side of the road with his trusty lazer cannon clocking up those fcukers who did anything over the accepted 10% faster than the speed limit and fining them or whether it was catching the eye of someone simply walking past him on the street and stopping him to achieve a search under the SOCPA rules and cite some relatively unknown clause which he stated allowed him to search the individual because he just didn’t like the look of him. When the individual made a song and dance about his rights, PC Fineman would be sure to use that authority and suggest the individual was causing a disturbance and was interfering in one way or another with a Law Enforcer while attempting to carry out his duty. Whatever Fineman did, he ensured he’d get the individual either to court and fined OR that there would be a PCN issued.
PC Fineman’s revenue generating capabilities were sought by all. After all, if a division could have a force filled with guys like him then they’d have a strong case for ensuring larger and larger budgets from their revenue hungry investors. Law Enforcement had become big business! When you have the British jail system being managed by SERCO or the like, then, yes, Prisons, Courts and Law Enforcement become a business with a cash flow, a profit and loss and a balance sheet just like any other business. AND DOESN’T MR KENNETH CLARKE KNOW THAT OH SO WELL!
“Birmingham Prison is to become the first jail in the UK to be privatised, Justice Secretary Ken Clarke has said.
The decision to award security firm G4S the contract to run the 1,400-inmate jail came after firms competed over the running of four prisons in England.
The Prison Officers’ Association called the decision “disgraceful” and has not ruled out taking industrial action.
Mr Clarke told MPs the “military are involved” in contingency plans should prison officers stage a strike.
Thirteen private prisons already exist in the UK – 11 in England in Wales, and two in Scotland – but this is the first existing public sector prison to be contracted out. The 13 prisons are each managed by one of three firms – Kalyx (previously UKDS), Serco or G4S Justice Services.”
Now, take into account who Ken Clarke “works” for and you’ll soon get the jist and put the very simple 2+2 together!
Anyhow, back to PC Fineman:
By 2010, he had risen up the ranks to Detective! WHAT A GUY! He’d started as a PC in Lothian and Borders Police in 2004 but by 2006 he’d also learned that he could go on what was effectively a fast track “course” which would add to his “pedigree” of fcuking people over for a buck – his seargent had loved him for it and finally introduced him to the Freemasons. PC Fineman knew this was the right move for him. Now he’d have an audience so to speak – a powerful audience full of judges – so that, for all those (and there hadn’t been many but they had pissed him off when he couldn’t get a decision upheld by the court) that managed to get away on the basis of some technicality of law (“Fuck the law” thought PC Fineman, “I don’t care about law I just care about results by imposing my version of it) or on the basis of their rights (“Fuck their rights, I’m a Police officer!!”) or on the basis that he was just carrying out an order for the top brass because some jerk was becoming a pain in the ass and the top brass wanted him silenced; NOW he’d have most of the judges accepting the little subtle sign of the freemason. “Great” he thought, “I’ll now be able to fuck over almost anyone I wish based on shit, impose any fucking statute act I want at any time and I’ll have the bastard’s balls in court because ‘my man’, the judge, knows who I am! Ain’t THAT the dog’s bollocks!”
Yes, as you can tell, Fineman was a cunt beforehand but, once his freemason status was approved (he wouldn’t be blackballed, his seargent would take care of that) he was a REAL cunt!
So then, by 2012, PC Fineman was now a star detective and a 15th degree freemason no less! This boy set all records no matter WHAT piece of corrupt, criminal, piece of shit he joined OR what corrupt, criminal piece of shit he imposed upon people.
One day, however, his younger brother, John, picked up on some issues that came to his attention and he started researching government and judicial corruption. Oh boy was this to cause some serious fucking issues!
As they say, you can pick your friends but not your family and PC Fineman hadn’t picked John for his brother! You see, John had some fucking integrity AND he had an IQ which put him into “genius” bracket in comparison to PC Fineman. The latter had joined the cops because, when all is said and done, a cop just has to do as he’s told – like the military, just follow orders. John, however, was a little bit of an analyst and he had excelled at school and had even gone on to university taking Physics and then he studied Economics and Business. The brothers, then, really never got on that well BUT they were still brothers.
John loved his brother but PC Fineman had always had that chip on his shoulder. Strangely, when John was coming home with A’s in his exams, PC Fineman was found coercing the other kids at school into parting with their lunch money. John didn’t get out much having to live on a few quid a week pocketmoney while his brother was out drinking and buying himself ipods and the newest mobilephone and picking up tarts who were impressed by it all. PC Fineman, then, learnt young, the benefits of using his brawn rather than his brain but he was still pissed off with John’s academic results.
Mother Fineman, however, being the mother all mothers are, loved both her kids. The stellar academic and the stellar coercive bastard who became the “pillar of society” as a Law Enforcement officer. Her boy protected people! SHE JUST DIDN’T KNOW WHO HE PROTECTED and neither did PC Fineman. He didn’t see it as protection because, in fact, he was meant to protect the public – he didn’t. He FUCKED the public and generated revenue and that is why he was where he was! As I said – a cunt!
John was stunned by what he had studied and found out meanwhile and he started to post his findings on blogs and messageboards. It was so incredible the info he was sharing however that it went over many people’s heads. They just couldn’t grasp the simplicity of it nor the enormity of what it meant. However, an ever greater number of people started to pick up on it all and this was beginning to have an impact on the British establishment because they realised people were beginning to understand things that they had, until then, no concept of. John was dangerous! Not to the public but to those who didn’t like exposure and ensured, up until then, they weren’t by citing “Not in the public interest”. It’s an interesting term that don’t you think? “Not in the public interest”. I don’t know about you but I’m interested in anything and everything ESPECIALLY when it is “Not in the public interest”. And one just has to ask themselves: “Who makes the decision regarding what should and should not interest me or the public?” Have YOU ever been asked? No? Doesn’t that then make you feel like some sort of child? “It doesn’t concern you Mr Jones, you should be seen and not heard. We don’t want your opinion!”
Oh which reminds me: Here’s a true story from yours truly. It happened about 6 months ago and stars me, two co stars and a prop called “Laser”.
I was driving my car to get some cigarettes at the nearby petrol station one night at about 7pm. I was on a road which was totally empy of traffic and of pedestrians. It’s a newly residential area comprising of flats which are built in their own little areas well off road all on one side of the road. On the other side of the road there is nothing much at all except field and the odd business premises which are then closed at that time of night. Again, well off the road area. Now at the start of this road (which is about a 1/3rd of a mile long) there is a slight incline and, until you reach the top of the incline you can’t see the rest of the road ahead – quite normal. There is then a bus stop half way along the straight flat section of the road and just after the bus stop there is a little layby. This particular night guess who is sitting in the layby? Yes you guessed it: A couple of PC Fineman’s friends with yellow jackets, a parked traffic car and a hand held laser gun!
Just as I reached the top of the incline, I noticed them in their little yellow “suits” and took my foot off the pedal a little – as you automatically do – but that wasn’t enough. Waved down by a yellow jacket and his gun!
So I stopped the car and left it running as I jumped out (a surprise to the yellowjackets it seemd) and walked over as they were walking toward me and the car and said “I can help you officers?”.
“Do you know what speed you were doing?
Me: “Oh perhaps about 40″
“43mph and you slowed to 38mph”
Me: “oh ok”
“Do you know the speed limit on this road?”
Me: “Oh I guess 40? (as I looked around at the totally empty road which was wide enough for 3 lanes yet only had two with a middle section which was lined)”
“No it is a 30mph zone as you can tell from the lamp-post spacing”
Me: “Oh is it? Have I broken a law officer?”
He then goes on to cite the road offences act and I explain that is a statutory act given the FORCE of law by the consent of the governed and is NOT a law. He then states “That is your opinion” to which I reply “Yes it is and I am correct in my opinion”. He does not follow up.
“Is this your car?”
Me: “Well I drive it but I don’t own it”
“Right! Who owns it?”
Me: “The DVLA”
“Oh so it belongs to the DVLA? Do you work for them?”
Me: “No, I don’t work for them but the car belongs to them”
“How is that?”
Me: “I am just the registered keeper”
“Ah so you DO own it?”
Me: “No, I said I am the registered keeper. The DVLA own it because I have registered it to them and that is why they can tow it away if they so wish”
“That is your opinion”
Me: “Yes, it is my opinion and I am correct. Look at the registration document”
“Have you been in trouble with the Police before?”
Me: Thinking ‘Am I in trouble now???’ LOL “No. I have lived in a number of countries……” About to tell him how corrupt police can be in these countries but was interrupted.
“Do you have your driver’s licence please?”
Me: “No, I don’t travel with it”
“Ok then what is your name?”
Me: “My name is David”
“And your surname?”
Me: “I don’t have a surname. I have a family name”
“Then what is your family name?” as he looks at me and they both glance at each other.
“Ok Mr Johnson…..”
Me: “Please don’t call me Mr. That is a legal title and I am not a Mr. David will do”
“Ok David. What is your address?
So I go on to give him my address.
“How long have you stayed at that address?”
Me: “About 2 years”
“What is your date of birth?”
Me: ” I don’t know for sure”
“What do you mean you don’t know!”
Me: ” I was rather young at the time. I had just dropped out of my mother’s fallopian tubes”
“You have a birth certificate don’t you?”
Me: “Well yes, I do but I cannot verify the veracity of such a document. Do you accept heresay?”
“What is the date on the document?”
Me: “Well it says, as I remember, the 18th July 1967″
“We will have to radio in and check your car and details”
Me: “Sure, go ahead”
The female officer then is on the radio and I overhear her stating ” a Mr David Johnson” to which I quickly turn and state once more “Please do not refer to me as Mr. I am NOT a Mr. My name is David Jonhson”. She looks at me slightly annoyed but carries on. While she is still speaking on the radio but has had some form of communication with the other male officer, HE turns to me and says “Well this is just a warning. Watch your speed more carefully” basically then saying words to the effect “off you go”.
During the time that the female officer was on the radio, I was explaining to this decent sort of guy (I have to say credit where it is due I suppose since, in their minds, they had every “right” to fine me for doing what they stated was 43mph in a 30mph zone) that, as a police officer, he should be catching REAL criminals, most of whom are in our government and most of our judiciary and a fair amount of police themselves rather than spending overtime at the side of a road catching people on some “statutory offence” while doing noone no harm.
When they let me go, I then said “But I would like to explain some things to you and ask you some questions about the issues I have raised AT a police station and which have not been acted upon. Perhaps I was pushing my luck BUT I’m just getting so SICK of this SHITE where these so called “Public protectors” (my ass!) are taking the piss out of law abiding people and making REVENUE out of them while they ignore the MASSIVE crimes of our establishment. Anyhow, they waved me on and it was clear they didn’t want to pass another 30 seconds with me! I WONDER WHY?
So back to the story of PC Fineman and bro:
So, John was now dangerous to the establishment while his brother was a fine upstanding coercive CUNT of the establishment but didn’t know it and couldn’t give a rat’s arse either. Just do don’t think!
One day, a bunch of detectives came to John’s door with a search and sieze warrant signed by some old fucker in a robe. John had offended someone’s sensibilities online because that someone didn’t have the first clue about what John was posting about but it offended him and he threatened John that he would report him to the Metropolitan Police since what John was saying (in the perception of some uneducated, ignorant individual who didn’t even wish to verify the points John was trying to make) was suggesting he was part of an organisation that this individual didn’t like because he perceived them as some sort of “anti establishment, racist organisation” (the SWP – yes that is what the individual stated). So the individual was actually continually refering to John as a racist and anti semite and John didn’t take too kindly to this from someone who didn’t care to check John’s sources of information even when some of it was from UK parliament!! John doesn’t like being slandered in such an ignorant fashion and made this clear to the individual in some choice words. However, it should be noted that the individual’s slandering and name calling commenced before John’s reactions to it!
So the Police entered John’s apartment and siezed approximately £2000 of equipment from him including all his computer equipment (2 laptops and a desktop), recording equipment and a few other items. They then left after stating they must go through all files and all recordings before deciding to charge John with something. The STRANGE thing, John thought, was that, of there was a charge to be made then all the evidence was online because surely the whole reason for the police’s visit was on the basis of the allegation made by this individual and that the allegation could ONLY be based upon what was already online and public. The individual could not POSSIBLY be “offended” by things he could not see on any of John’s hard disks! How totally bizarre then that the police did not just charge John then and there. If there was insufficient content to charge John on from the online exchange then what on earth would they be interested in content that was never published online to offend this person with?
[Get the point?]
So John would and could only consider that the police took his equipment to TRY and find something else to charge him with – this is very much a case of “entrapment” then because it would have nothing to do with the original allegation!
Anyhow, unknown to John and to his brother, the police had been advised to remove John’s capability to express himself online because it was causing certain people in certain positions discomfort. John had been communicating bluntly with everyone from top cabinet people in the UK government to little pondlife like the Scottish First Minister and also his MPs, making them fully aware of what John knew. John was then posting their responses online – pathetic and incompetent, evasive responses at that – and these people did not take too kindly to that because it was “Not in the public interest”.
Here’s an example of something else not in the public interest:
How many of the public think the Bank of England is publically owned? How many then scratch their heads at this:
(3) The Bank, if they think it necessary in the public interest, may request information from and make recommendations to bankers, and may, if so authorised by the Treasury, issue directions to any banker for the purpose of securing that effect is given to any such request or recommendation:
(a) no such request or recommendations shall be made with respect to the affairs of any particular customer of a banker; and
(b) before authorising the issue of any such directions the Treasury shall give the banker concerned, or such person as appears to them to represent him, an opportunity of making representations with respect thereto.
Sections 4(4) and 4(5) repealed by section 16(4) of the Official Secrets Act 1989.
Now isn’t that strange? A bank! And a bank “OWNED by the UK public” has sections of its act repealed by the OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT. Meanwhile if you read the first section of the act you can see quite clearly that the ownership of the bank stock was simply a swap for government stock (while the government borrow from the bank! LOL) while the treasury is only paid 50% of the bank profits annually! Now WHO get the other 50%? Ah well all of that is held very quietly behind the official secrets act.
You really can’t make this shit up you know!
So, meanwhile, John tells his brother, PC Fineman what the latter’s pals in blue did and starts to explain to PC Fineman all about the British Constitution and the law of the land etc. PC Fineman however, gets a headache and tells his brother to “shut the fuck up for once” and he’ll get his stuff back for him. John, however refuses to shut the fuck up until, one night, PC Fineman gets a call from his mother telling him John’s just died in a hit and run. His mother was with him at the time and she got a clear look at the driver and number plate and has reported it to the police.
The Police then capture who they believe to be the hit and run driver and, oddly, it turns out to be a lowly administrator within the Scottish Executive. The trial takes place and the driver is given, incredibly, a suspended sentence. PC Fineman lost his brother and he’s fucking angry while he hates politicians of all shapes and sizes and he goes off on a bender while he starts making accusations left, right and centre and promises his mother he’ll get the guy one way or another until, one night at a freemasonry event, the judge who gave the suspended sentence to the driver has a quick word with PC Fineman and whispers in his ear “You’ve lost one brother because he was a threat to the brotherhood. Now you’re doing a good job and the brotherhood doesn’t want to lose you brother! That’s a good lad!”
PC Fineman went home that night, rolled his trouser leg up and blew his brains out with his gun!
And you know what I say to that? Good riddance to bad scum! A FINE Law Enforcer was FINEman but a SHIT human and “brother”!
I am attacked continuously for being “Anti semite”.
People read but do not interpret the words properly.
People are so used to simply reading or hearing a few words which they then focus on and remove from all context. It is the world of soundbites.
People read and hear then interpret, not what is actually being said but what they wish to interpret.
I have literally been face to face with people who have simply closed down and refuse to listen or discuss and communicate to try and reach a conclusion where they would then actually understand what is meant rather than what they wish to interpret. I have been the victim of police/judiciary action specifically because of this. Even the latter don’t listen. They interpret a statute and simply apply it because “that is what it says” and “from what you said and wrote, directly contravenes that statute or our interpretation of what you said and wrote while we actually do not fully appreciate the broader issues we just concentrate on the narrow focus of what the statute says and what you have written”.
So then, I ask myself: If I AM an “Anti semite” then how can I call this group of people in the video beautiful? They’re jews. They proclaim their identity as such. They are proud of their jewish roots. I realise every religion on earth is man made and a manipulation tool but I also recognise the majority do not even though it is quite obvious. As the lad says in the video “circles” and he is told to put his “circle” (the jewish circle) above all others and he RECOGNISES the fundamental racism in this. Religions are entirely for the purpose of creating the world we have full of a single human race who are separated into factions like a Venn diagram. Each subset seeing itself as a “race” and the barriers are already set in place. Religion IS racism at its core and it has been, is and may always be a wonderful tool of those who are within not the 1% but the 0,01%.
But, whether I recognise this or not and those who follow their religions don’t, I can still see and appreciate beautiful people of whatever “race”, nationality or religion because they simply have humanity.
These young jews see the issue. They even recognise why jews have been persecuted over so many centuries and they recognise the “jewish” (I would like to show them why this “jewish” lot within the 1% and 0.01% are not jewish) influence within Banking and Corporate worlds. AND they are speaking out against it. They see how this money is being ploughed into the deaths and oppression of so many not only in Palestine but in Iraq, Afghanistan and anywhere else that does not play the globalist game and who wish to maintain their sovereignty.
Anyone can be evil no matter what “race” or religion they proclaim to be. The issue with the jewish “race” is that their religious teachings have been used, abused and hijacked but zionism and freemasonry. The zionist (Rothschild zionist) element have then used jews (the holocaust story while the zionists had every opportunity to transfer jews from danger – read the Transfer agreement) to enable and strengthen their “hand” and their calls for a jewish only state. They used Jewish blood to do this and they did it purposefully. Yet it is Aipac, JDL, ADL etc who proclaim the horrors of those events where jews have been persecuted yet, throughout, it has been a tiny group of wealthy and powerful men who have murdered jews to achieve their aims. These powerful individuals then setting up these Zionist organisations and brainwashing jews into believing zionism is just the wish for a jewish homeland (when, strangely, any and all other peoples who would demand such would be considered xenophobic racists).
Basically, it has been a mindfcuk. Exceptionally well orchestrated but so many jews believe in the ideology OR they have been bribed by being part of the “chosen people” who have such massive control of the entire world’s wealth through money manipulation. These young jews even refer to this and can see it.
But as there is a jewish circle, there is a circle above that which is zionist (the NWO agenda zionists motivated by money, power and greed) and above that there is a “Catholic or Jesuit” circle. There are many circles and it is the destruction of ALL circles (the Venn diagram subsets) which is needed.
If the wish for no circles, no “races” and no manipulated, state/UN controlled religion while wishing to bring an end to the LEGAL control of the world’s population through birth registration to an authoritarian state apparatus and bringing an end to the manipulation of money and the corruption of law through legislation of victimless “crimes” is anti semitic, then YES, I AM anti semtitic.
However, I can’t see how it is possible for an anti semite to literally find a lump in his throat while watching and listening to beautiful people who happen to be jewish!
So I simply wish to express my thanks to these young jews because I have children whom I do not wish to inherit a world which is becoming (and is) controlled by a very few psychopathic despots following some form of “code” which is written within Babylonian/Judaic texts. When I see and hear such from young jews, it makes everything seem so much brighter looking to the future. This “chosen ones” ideology needs to be destroyed because it is the precise equivalent of the Nazi ideology of the “Master race” – the terms mean one and the same thing.
Zionism and all circles require destruction. To do so, we need to focus on those in that 0.01% who have constructed them and maintain them. It IS a “war” and it is a real one – very much so. In fact, it has been the entire war for decades/centuries and winning it means peace. Globally. I don’t advocate violence (but then neither does the UN or any state at face value do they? but then they bomb the living daylights out of anyone in their way) because knowledge and education can achieve the same ends (and why they don’t wish for the money to go to such uses). There IS the need, however, to put the true criminals in jail for various forms of crime on humanity.
Now HERE is where I will lose some people:
The UN is a PRIME criminal organisation within the entire global scheme of things. The ironic thing is that they display it openly but people just do not wish to see it.
“What a ridiculous thing to suggest!” I can hear so many people state. Yes it appears to be doesn’t it? After all, UN Declaration of Human Rights and all that.
Ok, let’s look at the first 3 articles of that declaration:
- All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
- Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
- Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Sounds good doesn’t it? Ah! But wait a second. There is a HUGE, MASSIVE, in fact IMMENSE contradiction in it.
“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” Question: Do you wish to disagree with this statement?
No, I didn’t think so.
So then what about this.
“Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration.”
Question: Do you see the problem? It is staring you right in the face!
Let’s return to Thomas Paine for a moment from another blogpost:
Human rights originate in Nature, thus, rights cannot be granted via political charter, because that implies that rights are legally revocable, hence, would be privileges:
It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect — that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few… They… consequently are instruments of injustice.
Question: What is the UN Articles of Human Rights?
Answer: It is a POLITICAL CHARTER and a LEGAL DOCUMENT.
While the charter states, absolutely factually, that every person is born FREE and EQUAL, it then goes on to entirely contradict this very concept by stating “everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this declaration”.
Now, there are many issues with this which I sincerely hope the reader can see quite clearly.
IF people are BORN “free and equal” (which we are and I challenge anyone to disagree with such) then they are free and equal. End of story. Being free and equal MEANS that NOONE may infringe your “god given” human rights. What obviously follows from this, then, is that, just as noone can infringe your rights, noone has the authority over another to abridge them, to reduce them or even to state what your rights are! But this is precisely what the UN has done in their declaration. They state, effectively, that these are the rights, ACCORDING TO THEM, that you are allowed. Individual states then enact these rights to varying degrees, within their own state LEGISLATION (more legality). Every single time “rights” are written within legal parameters, they are diluted and from the very day the UN Articles were written, they diluted your “rights” within the global LEGAL system.
IF you are born FREE and EQUAL then I am afraid that IF the UN and the State is serious in its proclamation of such, then YOU have every right to say “Thanks but no thanks” to their “offer” of “protection” for, as a FREE and EQUAL man or woman, you may contract with whatever INDIVIDUAL or ORGANISATION you wish. If you are effectively stopped from making such a FREE and EQUAL decision (and remember the UN, as with ALL organisations, is composed of OTHER “FREE and EQUAL” individuals) then your rights are, in fact, being impinged upon. There is no two ways about this.
Now, the number of “rights” the UN provides you (“provides you”? HOW can they PROVIDE rights when you are already born absolutely FREE and EQUAL? This is the equivalent of a magician’s slight of hand trick) are limited. Forgive me for the following but it is for the purposes of demonstrating something:
Does the UN Articles articulate in any way that you have the right to fart on a public street? OR, what if you are standing in a queue in a bank and you’ve just had a chilli con carne? What if the bank wishes to pass a bye law for it’s own PRIVATE premises that NOONE may fart on its premises? Does the UN declaration state that everyone has the right to fart (a natural human process) wherever and whenever they wish? No, it doesn’t. So, the point is, what is stopping ANY organisation or group of people (even the state) from imposing a statutory act that states “No smoking and no farting in licensed premises”?
Yes, it’s a silly example but it is meant to be. The point is that the declaration is stating “these are your rights and that is it”. No no no. If you accept this then you accept your rights being removed.
THE SUBROGATION OF YOUR “GOD GIVEN” HUMAN RIGHTS TO THE STATE IS A FUNCTION OF YOUR BIRTH REGISTRATION. YOU MUST UNDERSTAND THIS! See the blogpost entitled “UN inadvertently confirms freeman concept”.
Now what about the third article?
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”.
ANOTHER interesting statement and concept from the UN so let’s look at that more closely:
Article 6 (Survival and development): Children have the right to live. Governments should ensure that children survive and develop healthily.
Now ignoring for a moment that this makes me laugh from the perspective that it is like saying “Children have the right to live but adults don’t”, there is something just as astounding. That is the following:
The September 2001 attacks signalled the only occasion in NATO’s history that Article 5 of the NATO treaty has been invoked and consequently the 11 September attacks were deemed to be an attack on all nineteen NATO members. After 11 September, troops were deployed to Afghanistan under the NATO-led ISAF and the organization continues to operate in a range of roles sending trainers to Iraq, assisting in counter-piracy operations and most recently enforced a NATO-led no-fly zone over Libya in 2011 in accordance with UN SC Resolution 1973.
The Berlin Plus agreement is a comprehensive package of agreements made between NATO and the European Union on 16 December 2002. With this agreement the EU was given the possibility to use NATO assets in case it wanted to act independently in an international crisis, on the condition that NATO itself did not want to act—the so-called “right of first refusal”. There are currently 28 member states of NATO, with the most recent being Albania and Croatia who joined in April 2009. The combined military spending of all NATO members constitutes over 70% of the world’s defence spending. The United States alone accounts for 43% of the total military spending of the world and the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy account for a further 15%.
Now, let’s put some perspective on this. 70% of the world’s defence spending is borne by the US, UK, France, Germany and Italy. These countries ALSO form the major founding nations within the UN and have the most voting shares. NATO, generally, finds its LEGALITY to interfere with any and all nations on the basis of UN resolutions. The following results from this interference:
The following is a transcript of a speech given by now 13-year-old Charlotte Aldebron at a peace rally in Maine.
When people think about bombing Iraq, they see a picture in their heads of Saddam Hussein in a military uniform, or maybe soldiers with big black mustaches carrying guns, or the mosaic of George Bush Senior on the lobby floor of the Al-Rashid Hotel with the word “criminal.” But guess what? More than half of Iraq’s 24 million people are children under the age of 15. That’s 12 million kids. Kids like me. Well, I’m almost 13, so some are a little older, and some a lot younger, some boys instead of girls, some with brown hair, not red. But kids who are pretty much like me just the same. So take a look at me—a good long look. Because I am what you should see in your head when you think about bombing Iraq. I am what you are going to destroy.
If I am lucky, I will be killed instantly, like the three hundred children murdered by your “smart” bombs in a Baghdad bomb shelter on February 16, 1991. The blast caused a fire so intense that it flash-burned outlines of those children and their mothers on the walls; you can still peel strips of blackened skin—souvenirs of your victory—from the stones.
But maybe I won’t be lucky and I’ll die slowly, like 14-year-old Ali Faisal, who right now is in the “death ward” of the Baghdad children’s hospital. He has malignant lymphoma—cancer—caused by the depleted uranium in your Gulf War missiles. Or maybe I will die painfully and needlessly like18-month-old Mustafa, whose vital organs are being devoured by sand fly parasites. I know it’s hard to believe, but Mustafa could be totally cured with just $25 worth of medicine, but there is none of this medicine because of your sanctions.
Or maybe I won’t die at all but will live for years with the psychological damage that you can’t see from the outside, like Salman Mohammed, who even now can’t forget the terror he lived through with his little sisters when you bombed Iraq in 1991. Salman’s father made the whole family sleep in the same room so that they would all survive together, or die together. He still has nightmares about the air raid sirens.
Or maybe I will be orphaned like Ali, who was three when you killed his father in the Gulf War. Ali scraped at the dirt covering his father’s grave every day for three years calling out to him, “It’s all right Daddy, you can come out now, the men who put you here have gone away.” Well, Ali, you’re wrong. It looks like those men are coming back.
Or I maybe I will make it in one piece, like Luay Majed, who remembers that the Gulf War meant he didn’t have to go to school and could stay up as late as he wanted. But today, with no education, he tries to live by selling newspapers on the street.
Imagine that these are your children—or nieces or nephews or neighbors. Imagine your son screaming from the agony of a severed limb, but you can’t do anything to ease the pain or comfort him. Imagine your daughter crying out from under the rubble of a collapsed building, but you can’t get to her. Imagine your children wandering the streets, hungry and alone, after having watched you die before their eyes.
This is not an adventure movie or a fantasy or a video game. This is reality for children in Iraq. Recently, an international group of researchers went to Iraq to find out how children there are being affected by the possibility of war. Half the children they talked to said they saw no point in living any more. Even really young kids knew about war and worried about it. One 5-year-old, Assem, described it as “guns and bombs and the air will be cold and hot and we will burn very much.” Ten-year-old Aesar had a message for President Bush: he wanted him to know that “A lot of Iraqi children will die. You will see it on TV and then you will regret.”
Back in elementary school I was taught to solve problems with other kids not by hitting or name-calling, but by talking and using “I” messages. The idea of an “I” message was to make the other person understand how bad his or her actions made you feel, so that the person would sympathize with you and stop it. Now I am going to give you an “I” message. Only it’s going to be a “We” message. “We” as in all the children in Iraq who are waiting helplessly for something bad to happen. “We” as in the children of the world who don’t make any of the decisions but have to suffer all the consequences. “We” as in those whose voices are too small and too far away to be heard.
We feel scared when we don’t know if we’ll live another day.
We feel angry when people want to kill us or injure us or steal our future.
We feel sad because all we want is a mom and a dad who we know will be there the next day.
And, finally, we feel confused—because we don’t even know what we did wrong.
Charlotte Aldebron, 13, attends Cunningham Middle School in Presque Isle, Maine. Comments may be sent to her mom, Jillian Aldebron at firstname.lastname@example.org.
But then we’ll hear the UN, through UNICEF saying “But look what we do? Look what we ARE doing for the Iraqi mothers and children!”
And all I will say is this: Yes, AFTER you have killed their fathers and destroyed their families, their infrastructure, their way of life and are now ready to rebuild in YOUR image! Incorporate an Iraqi Central Bank and provide “loans” which are carrots with strings attached to indebt the nation, control its resources and infrastructure and make DAMNED SURE those Iraqi children have their births registered (forget so many will be born with cancers due to depleted uranium which the UN states is still legal!! FORGET THAT!) so that they can be “RECOGNISED IN LAW” just as the rest of the west is. The controlling mechanism by which you can then impose taxes and duties and have them subjugated to the legalities which YOU impose!
Your damned righteous, pius, hypocrisy makes me want to puke!
So WHERE is the rights of tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of children who have been MURDERED by the States, the governments who the UN states should ensure their survival and healthy development? The “right to life”? Within a legal document which also legitimizes the taking of life? The UN does not say SOME children have the right to life and that governments should ensure the survival of SOME. Neither does it say that it is ok to drop cluster bombs and tomahawk missiles and machine gun from helicopters SOME children in the interests of saving more. It says ALL children. This is NOT a utilitarian world and neither does the UN articles suggest it SHOULD be. But the UN and the nations who compose the UN and NATO seem to think so!
So where were the rights of all these children murdered? Where were the rights of the thousands of palestinian children murdered by Israel in operation Cast Lead and others? Where are the warcrime tribunals for the Blairs and the Bush’s, Sarkozy’s etc etc? WHERE ARE THEY?
The answer? “Ah! But they’re OUR warcriminals! That’s the difference!”
But wait, didn’t you say that every child is born free and equal? Ah but then that is a pure lie UN because, as you say so very clearly, it is not until children are recognised LEGALLY, that, in fact, they do exist. And if they are not registered and have no birth certificate then they have no rights to ANY confered benefits by ANY state or government. So then they DO NOT, in your eyes, have any rights (privileges) from the moment they are born therefore, they are NOT born “free” until you bestow those rights upon them!
But then the “ying” of that “yang” is that you cannot control or tax them either if they are unregistered because they have not SUBROGATED their “god given” human rights to the legalities of which you promote. Once they do, you have them just where you want them!
One registers one’s car, one is the REGISTERED KEEPER but NOT owner. For if that car is your own private property then who (if you are free and equal) has the right to stop you from using it? But the DVLA does BECAUSE you have subrogated your ownership (rights) to your private property and may only use it under strict licence conditions.
One registers their child’s birth, one is then subrogating one’s authority (not responsibility however) to one’s child. You are transfering the legal “ownership” of your child to the state. The state, then, if it so desires, may take your child from you and this is NOT always because you are a bad parent but because you may just be an irritant to the state in one form or another. However, the bottom line is that IF we are all free and equal then NOONE, no individual or state or organisation has ANY right to remove your child. But they do because you CONTRACTED with them by registering your child. You have (ignorantly but through your ignorance, under no coercion) entered a LEGAL agreement with the state where you have transfered such inexhaustive rights to them AND they have handed you a legal document called a Human Rights Act, in place of your natural born rights. It’s brilliant and effective but it is a con and it is a crime on humanity because while they pretend it provides you with rights (and it does to a very small degree in comparison to the inexhaustive rights you were born with), it ensures that your entire life can be controlled from birth to death.
More Childs Rights:
Article 7 (Registration, name, nationality, care): All children have the right to a legally registered name, officially recognised by the government. Children have the right to a nationality (to belong to a country).
Question: Do they also have the right to forego a legally registered name officially recognised by the government state? And do they have the right to forego a nationality and retain their free, sovereign, human rights undiluted by the UN articles? When they do, the UN and the state then say they do not exist legally and therefore they are not “qualified” for any protection. They have no rights to freedom of movement around the world (no passport), they will not be allowed to find a job (oh dear! The state then won’t be able to tax anyone if everyone can’t find a job because everyone decides that they wish to utilise that freedom and equality to NOT register). So UN, all I am askng is: Are we free? Not until you tell us we are right?
Article 8 (Preservation of identity): Children have the right to an identity – an official record of who they are. Governments should respect children’s right to a name, a nationality and family ties.
I had and have an identity. I had one even before my parents registered me. I was their child and they gave me a name which they then simply believed they were making a record of when registering. They did not know they were subrogating my rights and providing me with a “monopoly piece” called a birth certificate which only then would allow me to buy and sell and contract – oh! And I forgot, also made me vulnerable to going to jail for a victimless “crime” based upon state legislation AND had me liable to immense increases in taxation to pay off a national debt that doesn’t need to exist if the state did not borrow its currency but simply issued it. Neither would I then have the PM state that I am liable for bailing out the banks and having then to endure austerity measures while these criminals were paid off, destroying my career, pension, savings etc. No I wasn’t told that and neither were my parents. I would guess, then, that that constitutes a case of non full disclosure of the contract set up BY the birth certificate. Doesn’t the “law” state that, in the case of one party to a contract not giving full disclosure then the contract is null and void? Yes, I think it does. Cheerio government. Knock on my door and you can respectfully fcuk off. Our contract is null and void!
Article 41 (Respect for superior national standards):
If the laws of a country provide better protection of children’s rights than the articles in this Convention, those laws should apply.
Interesting. WHO decides this? The state? or the UN? If either one of them then it surely would be that either party will vote for itself. If not decided by either of them then by whom? Whoever it is that decides however, is that not a decision for the party who may be affected by it? That would be the child (or possibly the parent) would it not? If you are suggesting some individual or some organisation other than the child or it’s parent makes that decision then you are stating that we are not all free and equal are you not? Or is it just some are more free and equal than others?
Article 24 (Health and health services):
Children have the right to good quality health care – the best health care possible – to safe drinking water, nutritious food, a clean and safe environment, and information to help them stay healthy. Rich countries should help poorer countries achieve this.
Tell that to NATO and the major UN nations who control it.
After all of that UN – TAKE A LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND RECOGNISE YOU OUTSTANDING HYPOCRISY.
But then who controls you?
Oh yes, I forgot. This guy and his ilk:
- Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Yes indeed. YOUR “law”. It’s so wonderful that you want the 50M children each year who are unregistered to be registered. And it is so wonderful that you had 750,000 children in Afghanistan given vaccines while, at the same time, you had administrators, attending along with the medical staff, to register these children.
Isn’t it a coincidence, then, that David Rockefeller makes the fiollowing speech regarding his concern about the world’s population growth and overconsumption and prospects of a decent life on this planet (for who?) within a UN speech he gave:
Isn’t it also then, a coincidence that Rockefeller, within this speech, also referred to the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992 which promoted the entire Climate Change. Sustainability agenda as proposed by the Club of Rome originally in their publication in 1972 called “limits to growth” which was then followed up in 1993 when they published ”The first Global Revolution”? Obviously being written before and during the year of the Earth summit then released as a “guidance”.
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Rio Summit, Rio Conference, Earth Summit (Portuguese: Eco ’92) was a major United Nations conference held in Rio de Janeiro from 3 June to 14 June 1992.
Why is that all a coincidence? Well, because:
The Club of Rome is a global think tank that deals with a variety of international political issues. Founded in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, the CoR describes itself as “a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity.” It consists of current and former Heads of State, UN bureaucrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe. It raised considerable public attention in 1972 with its report The Limits to Growth. The club states that its mission is “to act as a global catalyst for change through the identification and analysis of the crucial problems facing humanity and the communication of such problems to the most important public and private decision makers as well as to the general public.”
Well well well, there’s old Rockefeller’s name again! But there’s more because:
In 1993, the Club published The First Global Revolution. According to this book, divided nations require common enemies to unite them, “either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.” Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, “new enemies must be identified.” “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
But then there’s even more:
Rockefellers’ 1Sky Unveils the New 350.org: More $ — More Delusion
World’s Greatest Magic Trick “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” – George Orwell On 6 April 2011 it was announced that the RINGO (Rockefeller initiated NGO) 1Sky and their sister organization 350.org have ‘officially merged’ into one mass climate movement – the ‘NEW’ 350.org.
Let the Vatican preach, hallefuckinglujah, as we double-up on the soma followed by a double shot of absinthe burning like the embers of hell. Thank you Rockefellers, Clintons, McKibben and friends. Make way for the onslaught of illusion in which green capitalism and false solutions will somehow save us. In one last final performance – the elites will now perform their final magical act that defies all logic. Drum roll please … ladies and gentleman … we will now embrace the same system which is systematically destroying us – splash it with a green patina … and now … this same system will magically save us. Justice for all! The illuminated signs flash toward the audience … applause! applause! applause! Follow the Money
An example of what two prominent environmental groups, 1Sky and 350.org, receive from the Rockefeller foundations alone:
Step it Up and 350.org (Sustainable Markets Foundation)
· $100,000 for 1 year awarded on March 13, 2008 to support its project, Step it Up’s new initiative called Project 350 · 40,000 2008 Rockefeller Family Fund (RFF) for Sustainable Markets Foundation | 350.org · $100,000 for 1 year awarded on March 3, 2009 for its Project 350 · $200,000 for 1 year awarded on March 12, 2009 for its climate accountability project, The Sustainable Market Foundation · $75,000 for 1 year awarded on November 7, 2009 for its project 350.org · $25,000 for 1 year awarded on March 22, 2010 for its Eco-Accountability project · $100,000 for 1 year awarded on June 17, 2010 for its 350.orgproject
1Sky Education Fund
· $1,000,000 for 2 years awarded on December 13, 2007 · $20,000 for 1 year awarded on November 17, 2008 for an alignment meeting of U.S. climate change leaders · 200,000 2008 RFF · 45,000 2008 RFF · $250,000 for 1 year awarded on June 18, 2009 · $30,000 for 1 year awarded on April 9, 2009 to support a consultant to coordinate the alignment of U.S. climate change leaders and large grassroots organizations · $250,000 for 1 year awarded on November 2, 2009 · $250,000 for 1 year awarded on November 19, 2009 · 50,000 2009 RFF · 15,000 2009 RFF · 20,000 2009 RFF
350.org: The Environmental and sustainability group who are “Anti” Big oil and big business. FUNDED by the scions of Big Oil and Big Business, the Rockefeller Foundation! (Standard Oil/ENRON) How ABSOLUTELY bizarre! Until you understand the agenda!
The Climate change scam, brought to you by the very same scam artists who crashed the world’s economy, own the central banking system, loan all governments their currency, own and control the IMF, the UN, the world’s largest investment banks, the major oil and gas corporations, big pharma (vaccines) and much anything else you can imagine. While they fund organisations proclaiming to be anti capitalist and anti big business and while the Occupy movement is filled with the Environmental “Greenies” who are completely oblivious to facts and wish to remain so:
THESIS and ANTITHESIS: WORKS EVERYTIME!
But there’s even more:
Investment banker speaking about the amount of tax which could be imposed upon the world’s population to “fight” this “invented for the purpose” SCAM called Climate change, before he then introduces the one and only DAVID DE ROTHSCHILD – the “Jesus” of Climate Change while part of the other and more massively wealthy through banking and big business families.
HOW EXTRAORDINARILY BIZARRE!
But AGAIN, there’s more:
Al Gore, fresh from his attendance at the Club of Rome comes out with HIS evangelisation of Climate Change and wins a Nobel Prize for his “Inconvenient truth” movie (just like Obama wins a Nobel Peace Prize! It is hilarious!). However, this is Al Gore when faced with his OWN inconvenient truths:
Did I mention ENRON earlier?
OOPS! Goldman Sachs, ENRON and Al Gore! WHAT a combination!
But then the governments push through the legislation. LEGISLATION (LEGAL not LAWFUL). Legislation can be enacted while the next government could repeal it. It happens every single day. Now if something is a law it is a law for good reason. But legislation isn’t law but guess who they can impose it upon because of the subrogation of rights and transfering those rights by way of REGISTRATION to the state? Yes, you guessed it – YOU!
Now WHY would our legislators in government DO this to us? I mean surely it impacts them as well doesn’t it? WELL DOESN’T IT?
“Insider Trading Rules That Don’t Apply To Congress”
“Except that one thing you can do as a member is study pending legislation and regulatory changes, call up your broker and instruct him to trade on that nonpublic information. Do this as often as you want; you will suffer no penalty. There is no limit to how much money you can earn on insider trading in the House or Senate. Lawmakers and their staffers are specifically exempted.”
WELL, AS YOU CAN SEE……….. NO IT DOESN’T!
Now, I really do hope you are getting to grips with all of this because it is tiring me out trying to explain it in all so many ways.
Imagine if there were no such thing as continents and that the earth was just filled by 10 billion or more separate islands of about an acre each, each of which had one single family on it. Then, as the UN stated, we were all born free and equal such that everyone understood that and there was no possibility of grouping people into religions and nations. We all had boats and all had our own dedicated island. Would we have passports and birth certificates? Would we insist that if anyone visited our island, fell ill and we were Doctors that that they would need to produce a passport and then a birth certificate to be recognised as being worthy of treatment? Would one family decide to grow so large that they then said “stuff free and equal, I’m going to insist that all other islands can only trade if they use the currency I produce, otherwise I am going to build a bomb to ensure they do!”?
The world is sick because of the system which has been built up by a few. It doesn’t matter which “ism” that system falls under because each “ism” is controlled by the same few and each ism has been and will always be corrupted. It is us allowing these few to dictate to us while we are all meant to be “free and equal” that creates the misery, the deaths and the coercion. We have given them the power. It reall is time we take it back. How do we do that?
Simple: By embracing the (empty) words of the UN and giving them TRUE meaning. We cannot ever win by thinking of ourselves. Doing that just delays the time the corruption touches you or one of your family. The ONLY way is to embrace those ideas fully and apply them to all. Only then will the many tame the few.
And with that…. Goodnight.
The Hidden Truth Behind The News
Pandora’s Box opens up more Grime and Slime – Occupy Wall Street
Pandora’s Box Opens up more Grime and Slime
Occupy Wall Street Scam
Does the New World Order actually exist? – You bet it does!!
Did you ever link the Masonic Lodge with this massive empire? – You should have!!
Ever wondered how this evil satanic empire obtains its money? – Its easy believe me!!
Did you ever believe that Wiki Leaks was sincere or the current Occupy Wall Street?
Something strange going on here!!
How come George Soros and Rothchilds are funding these well planned illusions?
Before delving into Occupy Wall Street lets just reflect on one bank that topped the list here in the UK.
I came across an interesting article by David Noakes who in my opinion hit the nail on the head when he made the following statement:
The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) went from assets of plus £88 billion in 1999 to estimated liabilities of minus £1.3 trillion in 2009 – equal to a year’s income (GDP) for the whole of Great Britain. If Directors with mental disabilities had been appointed, they might have reduced the bank’s value by half. But to utterly destroy it on so stupendous a scale took real knowledge and determination.
It seems clear the wholesale mismanagement and corruption of banks by their directors was not unbelievable incompetence, but criminal. The government huffs and puffs at bonuses and pensions paid as a reward for failure, but then in every case it lets those corrupt payments, totaling billions of pounds, stand without passing legislation to confiscate. It looks as though these huge bonuses and pensions were intentionally paid to compensate directors precisely for destroying their own banks, and for a job well done, Not to mention the donations to political figures and their party
The courts, CPS, coroner, FSA, directors and police have closed ranks to prevent a criminal prosecution or investigation. These services all have large numbers of Freemasons in their senior structures.
High ranking Freemasonry runs right through this banking crisis. All the failed banks, Northern Rock, Abbey, RBS, Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) had Freemasonry controlling their boards. Gordon Brown is a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Freemason, as was Tony Blair; there are 400,000 of them in Britain.
Gordon Bowden and I certainly agree with David Noakes, especially in regard to the Courts, Coroner, FSA, Directors and Police…..we both have continuously exposed massive fraud with forensic evidence produced by Gordon and all information/evidence has been passed on to Politicians, Political Parties, Serious Fraud Office and the local police……they are so arrogant they do not even reply to the claims made and even refuse to take recorded statements under oath. Having said that we must fully understand that this goes well beyond what David Noakes has reported…….this is how the New World Order operates and how they fund their huge organization……they are answerable to no one!!
Now back to the Occupy Wall Street Movement – What is really going on?
From the outside it would appear that a western type Arab Spring is unfolding but is there something more sinister taking place and who is fuelling it?
As we have seen that since the original world financial meltdown there has been increasing unrest in the Arab World and also in such places as Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and now Italy……….we have also seen two very significant protest marches in London, one being for the students and another for the unions regarding cut backs to the public sector, jobs and services etc…….what is now happening is a ground swell of frustrated citizens in the US, UK and EU rebelling against the banking, financial and corporate sector……however, what is truly happening is that this unrest is being hijacked by the political elite, extremely rich members of the New World Order and by the Zionist movement (both Christian and Jewish).
The previous meltdown was a well orchestrated master plan by the New World Order to collapse banks and financial institutions and at the same time close down many companies with resultant loss of income for the workers who in turn lost their homes…….this then allowed the New World Order to pick amongst the carcasses of dead companies and purchase the more lucrative aspect, leaving the toxic debt to the respective governments to bail out who then passed that debt onto the taxpayers.
The spin off from this and the ongoing resultant wars have blown most peoples income out of the water making it almost impossible for families to balance the books and buy food etc……..many have also now lost their homes because they no longer have a job and cannot cover their mortgage……..this then allows the New World Order to once again spread their talons and scoop up their homes at ridiculous prices.
We are now on the verge of a second collapse which will be far greater than the first and this time will directly damage the US, UK, EU and even places like Australia……the impact on the world cannot be ascertains at the moment but believe me it will make the previous meltdown miniscule by comparison.
With all of the above activity the true victim is the ordinary tax payer in each country……the government bail them out……..the banks and the government eventually get their money back or become a shareholder in the institution but the little old taxpayer never gets his tax reduces or his money back and will be responsible for clearing the debt for around 10-15 years…………one in three children (4 million) in the UK will be in poverty, record levels of unemployment, diminished public sector services i.e. NHS etc and cut backs on discount bus fares etc………..so maybe now we get to understand why now its the turn of the west to have their spring. Let’s all remember that if taxes go up and the public sector services go down, it is we that are paying for their excessive greed and fraud…..this is a sort of reverse Robin Hood concept….rob the poor and give to the rich (New World Order).
The only problem is that the New World Order can close down any bank, financial institution or company whenever it so chooses…..in actual fact in can bankrupt any country i.e. Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy etc…….then we see the World Bank/IMF (Who are the New World Order) fly in and offer a rescue package with strings attached…….this forces the respective governments to cut back on the public sector…..what they call austerity measure and increase taxes…..and many other compulsory conditions……once achieved that country remains in debt to the WB/IMF for an indefinite duration if not forever.
Jobs continue to go, food prices and fuel continue to rise and the value of our wage packet drops to nearly half……..whilst all this is going on they are acting out their own geo political plan to fuel dissidents in many countries and to force regime change……it is at this point that the Arab Spring came into being and now the Occupy of Wall Street Movement has taken precedence. Please understand that behind this facade lies many actors that have infiltrated into the groups and crowds in order to stir them up and create civil unrest………in the meantime the Author of the unrest (the funder) takes advantage of this unrest to apply pressure to remove those in government they choose to blame………they also hope that the protest do get out of hand, create civil unrest and damage property etc as this plays into their plan.
One such funder is George Soros…….a notorious fraudster who on face value appear to be one of the crowd but his intention his only to get his own hand picked men into office and then carry out mass arrests of those that were protesting genuinely. It is people like him and the Rothschild’s who encourage conflict and wars as this is not only good for business (Arms Trade) but also keeps up the price of oil to which they directly benefit!!
The only way the genuine activists can win against this evil plan is to demonstrate peacefully and not allow things to get out of control.
George Soros International War Criminal and Fraudster
They must check and double check that those amongst them are genuine and not there to add fuel to the fire or allow a political party to take over their cause for their own purposes……..a good example of this was the last big union rally in London when Ed Miliband stole the show.
Can you imagine if Ed Miliband and Labour took over we would be handing our country over to Israel and no doubt his brother David would come out of the closet to hold a senior position and hey presto job done!!!
Activist should research who are behind these financial meltdowns and make sure that these hard line activists amongst their ranks are not working for the New World Order (NWO)……this is what they want…..disrupt the police, damage property resulting in mass arrests. When this type of action takes place it plays into their master plan and allows them to put their puppets in office, create more security measure and place the country into a total “Police “State.”
We must all understand that if all political leaders and their respective parties, union leaders and police have been informed of this massive fraud and do nothing, then they are part of the NWO. Myself and Gordon have approached them so many times, been to their meeting, sent messages to the Students Union and they do not even answer…….can you imagine thousands of jobs being lost, student fee hikes now triple and yet they choose to ignore that billions of pounds is being siphoned from the system and do nothing…..wouldn’t you as a student start asking questions of your union.
George Soros is a key player in all the New World Order groups and is part of the Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission and the CFR.
It is interesting to note the follow comment regarding the movement he his funding:
“Billionaire investor George Soros says he can sympathise with the ongoing protests on Wall Street, which have spread to other US cities”
Let’s also look at some of the other not so glossy comments made about this fraudster:
“A bad week for the financier of American progressive politics got a bit worse. A North Carolina-based cargo airline claims George Soros and one of his partners designed “an elaborate shell game intended to defraud,” and are using it to duck a $ 39.4 million judgment. The company, Tradewinds Holdings a subsidiary of Coreolis Holding say they hold a legal judgment against C-S Aviation Services, and seek to pierce the corporate veil to hold George Soros and Purnendu Chatterjee responsible”.
“George Soros, the hedge fund billionaire, has failed in his latest attempt to overturn an insider dealing conviction handed out in France 23 years ago. The European Court of Human Rights rejected his argument that French law on insider trading was not sufficiently clear to provide grounds for a conviction”.
“He said he understood the anger at the use of taxpayers’ cash to prop up stricken banks, allowing them to earn huge profits”.
Occupy Wall Street Movement is funded indirectly by George Soros who himself has been charged for massive fraud and corruption and it is vital that the genuine members of Occupy Wall Street are aware of this and do not become its victim!!!
George Soros intentions is to create unrest in the west…allow the crowds to force change……a sort of Western Arab Spring…..then change the law to tackle this unrest…a sort of New World Order Patriot Act….. divide and conquer….put in your own puppet government (members being the NWO) and carry out mass arrests and hey presto you have a new government running a new police state and with the brain washed activists becoming the new victims to their own sincere effort by not knowing what they have just done for George Soros and his thugs
George Soros has also supported and financed the activists in Egypt, Libya and Syria but having other evil intentions in mind………..the Arab Spring and the Western Spring are basically the same and the only purpose is to implement their own geo political plan. Did you know for instance that Ghadaffi had intended to privatise all the oil companies in Libya and it was this alone that caused the New World Order via its military arm (NATO) to take out Libya.
Ghadaffi may have been corrupt, like many political figures, but as a President he did more for his country than any other country on the African Continent…….in that regard he was a good man and his country prospered from the wealth…..his intention to take over such companies as BP etc was part of his endeavor to churn the wealth back into the people……now the west has blasted his country with weapons of mass destruction and continue to pillage it natural resources.
The truth behind George Soros
The Occupy Movement was initiated in Vancouver Canada in July 2011 by the Adbusters Media Foundation….a not for profit organization….On the 17th of September a group of around 500 protestors descended on Wall Street……this turn out was very carefully over exaggerated by the media when they announced thousands had turned out in Wall Street!!!
The Mayor of New York obviously knew about this event just prior to the occupation when he predicted “riots in the streets if economy doesn’t create more jobs.”…..how did he know this…..because it was planed by those that had infiltrated the movement and Blomberg was informed……..it is also fact that the police also so happened to have staged a dummy riot on Brooklyn Bridge with various actors and again this was used as part of a propaganda tool by the media and one could assume the same when the activist attended the NYPD building etc. Did you ever ask the question how come this movement became so international in a very short time frame and how come the media, especially Fox and Sky, so enthusiastically falsely report it?……..the answer is simple….it was all a well orchestrated master plan by the New World Order with non other than George Soros at its centre.
Money for the so called activist came also from the Tides Centre with direct connection with George Soros who is directly connected with the Trilateral Commission, the Council of Foreign Relations and is a key player in the Bilderberg Group which is notoriously connected to the NEW WORLD ORDER……there is also a connection to the Ruckus Society which all leads back to George Soros…….it would appear that George Soros pumped in around $4.2 in 2008 and has since this time continuously support dissident groups…….Through George Soros and the New World Order he has also supported dissident groups in Egypt, Libya and Syria……..so far Egypt has fallen and is still pending a new puppet government and Libya is currently within their grasp……Syria almost went but managed to hold themselves in tact although the UN (who also belong to NWO) want the international community to take action (they mean NATO) .……..the final goal is to be Iran…….however with the latest false flag ( plan to take out the Saudi Ambassador) the US have not been so convincing…. LOL!!!!!
It is now time for all activist to do their homework and to find the true axis of evil here within the street of London
Or should that read where money is siphoned off?
This is how the AIM explain themselves by saying the AIM is the London Stock Exchange’s international market for smaller growing companies. A wide range of businesses including early stage, venture capital backed as well as more established companies join AIM seeking access to growth capital. What is doesn’t mention here is that it knowingly allows these scam virtual/shell companies to operate under its banner, even though people like our past and current PM have continuously been briefed, the LSE (London Stock Exchange) and the SFO (Serious Fraud Office) and yet they still do nothing!!!
You may find it hard to believe that the AIM (Alternative Investment Market) is totally unregulated and clearly supports virtual companies/shell companies who pillage thousands of investors of billions of pounds….these investors put their life savings into an offshore oil drilling programme or another phase of a mining project in some remote part of the world (the more remote the better – then you can’t check it out!!) in the hope they will get a good return……..what they didn’t know was that scumbags like the CEO of Lonhro, David Lenigas, are taking their money from day one and lining their own pockets. They operate from boiler rooms at such addresses as shown in the Pandora’s Box banner at the head of this article……..these virtual companies have directors but no staff….they do not even exist…..there is no oil rig…..there is no mine and these fraudulent elite share this wealth…..they include Corporate Directors, Bank CEO’s and very Senior Political (right at the top and some ministers).
One could take the current case of our ex Minister of Defence, Liam Fox and his close friend Adam Wirritty as one such classic case and maybe we can recall our own Prime Ministers, David Cameron’s visit to India when he tried to twist the arm of the Indian PM into accepting another fraudulent deal for and on behalf of his friend Sir Bill Gammell, Non Executive Chairman of Cairn Energy PLC in Edinburgh (a regular donor to the Tory Party). I have already covered the Bill Gammel fraudulent deal but as one would expect the deal went ahead anyway.
So what did Gordon Bowden uncover in the Fox – Wirritty scandal…….this was his email to me which uncovers some irregularities……..one could only assume that Fox was not the only one that benefitted from the many MoD deals and maybe even the Tory Party yet again received a good sized donation………as it did many years ago when it siphoned off £17.8 million of tax payers money to purchase 3 illegal nuclear bombs from South Africa and then allowed them to be stolen from their insecure compound…….one would have to ask Sir Ken Warren and our current PM, David Cameron the truth behind that deal which I have also covered in my Pandora’s Box series…..can you imagine this matter was raised in Parliament by Lord Doug Hoyle and Margaret Beckett MP and to this day the Tory Party have not been forced to respond…..it is recorded in Hansard if you do not believe me so go check it out….the reference is Hansard June 22nd 1993 from column 197…..also note that as a direct result of this highly illegal action Dr David Kelly was assassinated as it was he who had to check the health of the 3 nuclear weapons before departure from South Africa and upon their arrival in Oman before the money could be paid and the £17.8 million placed in the Tory Party Election Fund.
Now that you are starting to understand the dirty side of politics maybe you would like to know more about the Fox – Wiritty fiasco as uncovered by Gordon Bowden.
Start of Gordon’s email:
It wasn’t very hard to find the direct links between those involved with Liam Fox, Adam Wirritty and their Jewish funders, using fraud money laundering front companies.
Adam Wirritty had his pockets filed by.
The chair of Bicom
However, he is in Companies House actually named as.
Mr CHAIM ZABLUDOWICZ
a Director of.
THE JEWISH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
With some big hitting LORDS and CONSERVATIVE VIP’s
a.k.a without the MR is.
He has a large list of Companies, among them a group of “Tamares” Companies
TAMARES CAPITAL LTD
TAMARES MEDIA (UK) LTD
TAMARES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS UK LTD
TAMARES REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LTD
The registered address for their interlocking network of common director Companies:
41 DOVER STREET
However, researching the listed Companies Documents they played “round robin” with their “G” Offices, leaving one, only to return in sequence back to the original offices.
The give-away I spotted immediately 36-40 JERMYN STREET. LONDON. SW1Y 6DN
It is in FACT a MASSIVE “BOILER ROOM”
with a variety of SUITE numbers
38 JERMYN STREET. LONDON SW1Y 6DN
And to show the association:
Some of the Companies that fled 22 ARLINGTON STREET. LONDON SW1A 1RD after the PANDORA’S BOX Disclosures fled straight here.
Most of LONRHO’s other interlocked fraud Companies fronted by Aussie Co Artist DAVID ANTHONY LENIGAS
VATAKOULA GOLD MINES PLC
SOLO OIL PLC
LENIGAS AND OIL PLC
KALAHARI MINERALS PLC
UNIVERSAL COAL PLC
PALADIN RESOURCES PLC
PACIFICA ENERGY LIMITED
These and a multitude of other FAKE, FRAUD Money Laundering Director Only Cash Shells.
Like I said, with Company Documents, they can run, but they can’t hide, not with Corporate registered Documents. – Gordon – End of email.
Finally if one is to hold a peaceful demonstration it should be held at the London Stock Exchange, the AIM (Alternative Investment Market) and at all the addresses shown above in the Pandora Box banner…….all of these locations are boiler rooms for virtual companies that do not exist i.e. Oil Company, Mining Company etc who are ripping this country off to billions of pounds each and every year and that’s not counting the tax avoidance aspect…….the directors are in bed with the Banks who are all in bed with Senior Political Figures. Two locations of significant importance is 22 Arlington Street, London (Next to the Ritz Hotel) and Lonhro situated on the 2nd floor of the Cadbury Schweppes building – 25 Berkeley Square London…..it is at such locations where our country has/is been raped and thousands of investors have said goodbye to their investment money.
My final question would be why is David Lenigas still operating these scams and living the high life………you had better ask the SFO and our current government who protect him!!
Peter Eyre – Middle East Consultant – 16/10/2011
For more on Soros, please read other blog entries I have previously written regarding, particularly: “An orchestrated crisis”. Peter Eyre is so very correct in trying to get this message out that Soros (Rothschild boy) and, as I now see, Julian Assange (Rothschild “bitch”) are trying to co-opt this Occupy movement.
The problem with suggesting this is an “anti capitalist” movement is immense: These people WANT Communism. They want a level playing field (sounds good doesn’t it?). But no, it’s not. They want a massive gulf between them (the true evil elite) and us (the rest). So they WANT you to have communism BUT, as with the old soviet idea (and the present EU idea) this “communism” has a tiny elite at the top who run the entire show. They own the government, the banks, your right to live. They dictate any and all political policy, legislation, control the courts, the Police, the entire show. From that comes absolute, unadulterated tyranny. If you don’t focus in on the real evil in this, at the top of the tree, and allow these people to co-opt this movement – it’s the end. Game set and match for the New World Order.
This is why the protests need to be entirely peaceful. Violence gives them every excuse to “put the boot in” and believe me, they will. They can do nothing if there is no violence. But then you also MUST come to terms with and recognise who the puppetmasters are and take your focus away from the “little guy” working in Wall Street. Yes they’re criminals but they have been working in an entirely criminal system. It is the system (and the people behind it) who need to be brought down. NOT by pushing for communism and being anti capitalist (these are just “isms” both of which can be and are corrupted) but by re-constituting LAW. Not LEGAL but LAW. It is ONLY LAW which will beat this system. A LAW which is based upon morality.
“See you Jimmy! Your tea’s oot!” (Aye Jesus was a Scotsman who believed in FREEEEDOM!)
When Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs uttered the words “We do God’s work”, the man in the sandals had had enough. The ultimate blasphemy. For, what is long forgotten by today’s catholics and christians is one of the basic teachings of the man in the sandals that they follow:
And, by god! Did that man Blankfein and his criminal buddies (which make up the entire governments and corrupt capitalists of the western world) take usury (the charging of interest on money) to an extreme – and still are.
So now, you have the muslims AND the christians (even though most christians will still not understand what it is they are doing in effect) attempting to cast the moneylenders from their temple.
You see, the world has turned for centuries on the basis of this corrupt usury and the Muslim faith and Christian faith BOTH follow the teachings of Jesus in respect to the most fundamental control and oppression of the entire human race!
There is, as I understand it, only ONE religion on the face of this earth that does not outlaw usury (except amongst its own). 3 guesses which one!
One has been brought up being told (the earliest form of political correctness I would suggest) that, in company, one must never discuss politics and religion and CERTAINLY not mix the two. Now, there may just have been good reason for such a teaching by certain people! Because, at the very core, politics IS religion and relates life TO religion – albeit very subtly.
So, with “Occupy Wall Street” gathering pace and numbers all across the globe, I see a merging of the two major religions of the world – Islam and Christianity – whether they both recognise it or not. It is fact. Even for the ignorant, and even for those who have hate for the other, they are actually merging in one fundamental respect: A war against usury.
My only hope is that these two religious forces can come to appreciate that and appreciate what the enemy truly is. That enemy is that ideology which goes against the fundamental teachings of Jesus: A prophet to one of them and a messiah to the other whilst, just fact, an individual who is mocked and held in disdain by the force which would wish to keep its lustful, avaricious grip on humanity.
Personally, I have no belief in any man made god (no I’m no atheist, I am only an atheist toward the gods of man and not the Creator, whoever and whatever it may be) but I DO appreciate the simple humanitarian teachings of this Christ figure – particularly when it comes to this issue of money and usury which he knew was evil.
I again, only hope that, while the protestors against Wall Street greed continue, they do not miss the core of the corruption and the core of the evil. We have all operated within a system set up by this inhuman elite and, therefore, we have all participated to various degrees. Yes the Wall Street Investment bankers have capitalised through insider trading and pure criminal corruption but then the system has been set up this way and you either play the game or you don’t. It has been a conditioning of the human race and while I am making no excuses for those who have played the game fully, I am simply saying they have played within the “rules” of what has been set up as a corrupt game from day one.
To simply try to get these people to pay more tax will achieve nothing in my view. The REAL elites at the very top of this global “ponzi scheme” are wanting this attack on Wall Street and the bankers believe me. They want to destroy the middle class (to some this middle class will be multi-millionaires and even some billionaires but, to the REAL evil, they are STILL “middle class”). The people at the top want the system to crash just leaving a very few elite and the rest of us. With an IMMENSE gap in between. These elite are really not interested in cash any longer. Money was and is simply a tool to them. This tool, over decades and centuries, has allowed them to create and control this “ponzi scheme” while then allowing them to buy their way into power. Power is the control of governments, resources, countries.
Once they achieve that (and please remember when you think of Ron Paul etc who want to go back to a gold standard, that these same elites OWN the vast majority of gold) and they more or less have – they have no need for money. If you own everything you pay for nothing do you? If you own the circus you don’t pay to see the show do you? The ONLY “money” necessary will be for the rest of us and that money will be entirely electronic in time.
So, the point is this: Do NOT concentrate on that which is only a symptom of the disease – the symptoms being that there are bankers getting rich playing the game – but concentrate on what and who created the disease in the first place and eradicate that/them. When I say eradicate, I mean, through education and then law, set the conditions which disable them from having such power. Change the law. Do not go back to a gold based currency, a fiat system of notes is just as good BUT create the law which makes it incorruptible. GOLD is FIAT. Don’t let this idea of it being rare fool you. Yes it is rare but so are moonrocks. ANYTHING can be deemed money and ANYTHING can be manipulated and corrupted. The ONLY thing which protects ANY currency or commodity from manipulation and corruption is the LAW which surrounds it.
We must, however, concentrate on the top of this pyramid and demand that the Foundations which hold this elite’s wealth be scrapped. That the money is redistributed. That the legalities they have used to buy up their power are scrapped and that this is retroactive. It can all be done and done in stages.
But finally, to all you christians and muslims out there: Recognise how the system has been set up and also how your religions have been too (and corrupted) and just realise that we are all one on this world and break down the final “Berlin wall” which is the wall between you both. Let go of the dogma you have been conditioned with since birth and allow basic humanity to allow you both to love one another. Enough of this dogmatic “If you’re muslim you will be outcast if you love a christian” etc. If Islam is a religion of love then love knows no barriers and the same goes for christianity. Start practicing this love you preach. If you put up barriers then you set conditions for love. There ARE no conditions!
And to repeat to Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, IMF, World Bank, BIS etc etc
Your tea’s oot!
In this episode Jesus and his disciples travel to Jerusalem for Passover, where he expels the money changers from the Temple, accusing them of turning the Temple to a den of thieves through their commercial activities. In the Gospel of John Jesus refers to the Temple as “my Father’s house” thus in some views making a claim to being the Son of God.
This is the only account of Jesus using physical force in any of the Gospels. The narrative occurs near the end of the Synoptic Gospels (at Mark 11:15–19, 11:27–33, Matthew 21:12–17, 21:23–27 and Luke 19:45–48, 20:1–8) and near the start in the Gospel of John (at John 2:13–16). Some scholars believe that these refer to two separate incidents, given that the Gospel of John includes more than one passover.
“And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all of them who sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves”
King James 2000 Bible
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, who
say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and
worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you.
WHO SAY THEY ARE JEWS, AND ARE NOT, BUT DO LIE: ZIONISTS! Or, as Churchill called them: ATHEIST JEWS.
And to any IDIOT who suggests this anti semitic – Get a BRAIN! How can one speak of ATHEIST JEWS and be such? How can there even be such a thing as an ATHEIST and a JEW??
Ask Churchill! He knew! Or was he an “anti semite” too?
Next stop: Occupy the Vatican!
Next again stop: Occupy Jerusalem!
DON’T use violence. Use Intelligence. The latter will grind them into the dust.
You just need to ask yourself (then decide) who’s side you’re on? Your own and those around you? Your loved ones? Or the people who have created this system wherein you play a very tiny, insignificant part where you are IGNORANTLY supporting your own and everyone else’s oppression?
And ONE day Detective, IF, IF they manage to win and have kept you a slave to your own ignorance, they will dispose of you and yours. The thieving, corruption and removal of your and yours wealth will continue until you suddenly turn round and recognise you were building your own prison while you thought WE were the bad guys!
But, by all means Detective, you keep reading through my blog. Keep reading my hard drive looking for the evidence of some racist hater because I point in certain directions (not just one), keep watching my vids – not because you wish to be educated probably but because you, or the establishment lackey judiciary, want to find something, anything you can pin on me. There is nothing unless you are simply willing to make something out of nothing while your ignorance of the big picture and your willingness just to do what you’re told without any thought of your own, has you focused with absolutely no peripheral vision. “Just get him”. And the ADL and our Zionist occupied government full of corrupt bastards will thank you for it. The more you find the like of me and take care of, the more you will be awarded. Be a good dog or be an individual with some intellect and common sense.
Now, regarding the money creation issue I keep going on about in these blogs, providing every evidence from congressional and parliamentary archives, minutes, speeches and then showing how that creation out of thin air is then used by the morally bankrupt “elite” using their own insider knowledge who then invest in hedge funds etc: Here is Congressman Dennis Kucinich talking about a blaze of democracy (which you can be assured the corrupt will wish to manipulate then control as they did the Tea Partyists) which is hardly getting airtime on our mainstream media. Why would it? It is the same feral elite who own mainstream media! They don’t want true democracy catching on! And they look to you – their paid lackeys who don’t think just do – to protect them from true democracy.
And your Judges, your Procurator Fiscal, your Magistrates – what do they do? They apply “the law” based upon a legal system again controlled by these same elites. Who legislates Detective? The government does right? Or if you wish, Parliament but Parliament is whipped (the whole point of having Whips Detective!). So then they legislate. The courts apply that legislation. You go to court and show in black and white how the system is entirely corrupt and what happens? You’re in contempt of court. You show them a mirror and you are in contempt of court.
They then say “You must work such issues with basic legislation through Parliament and government” while the MPs try desperately to ignore you OR, if they can’t, they suggest the only way to fight the issue is through the courts. HOT POTATOES because it works. Noone takes responsibility “It wasn’t me officer!” while they all watch each others’ backs.
You ask why you must pay your tax when the money is created out of nothing by banks while the government could do the same just as easily but no, they actually BORROW the money created from nothing at interest which means they must tax us heavily to pay the interest back. While the interest is NEVER added to the original capital injected so where do we get the interest from to pay back? We don’t. THAT is why the government NEVER “wishes” to pay off the national debt but just service the interest. Because the money is not in the system to allow them to pay the entire sum off.
So then, back to court. One explains then how one is getting ripped off – it is an immoral, thieving corruption by banks and the government in collusion BUT it is they who make the law. Yes the banks make the law – not your High St bank Detective, I’m talking about the Goldman Sachs and JP Morgans of this world who bribe people like Tony Blair to do their work both domestically in the UK and abroad – meeting with Gaddafi not on UK PM business (which was his job) but on JP Morgan business! Effectively, then MOONLIGHTING. Then after the good job he did for the banks Detective, the Rothschilds – nice people – pimped him out and got him the nice cushy $2M/year with JP Morgan AND gave him the Middle East Peace Envoy job!
But again, back to court: So, what happens when anyone refuses to pay tax on the basis of understanding this corrupt scheme (on YOU as well as I and everyone else)? The lackey judge points to some statute or other and says “It’s law! You MUST pay!”
But the law is corrupt because it is put in place by these same corrupt people. The law is the enforcement to ensure we remain absolute debt slaves!
FUCK THAT DETECTIVE!
The Judge will not even hear the argument about the reality of the system and the corruption and will compartmentalize the proceedings saying words to the effect “This court is hearing on the issue of non payment of tax, these are the statutes which apply” END OF STORY!
No, again Detective: FUCK THAT!
Now, you can either appreciate fact when you read it hear it smell it and KNOW it or you can dance with the sick immoral fuckers and keep doing what you’re doing.
If you are a smart guy though Detective, you will want to understand this because, make no mistake, there is a revolution coming and YOU can help keep it a peaceful one OR, alternatively, you can decide to kill - and it may come to that knowing these sick fuckers as I do. But remember, you’ll be effectively killing your own.
If you wish to understand and learn Detective, my door is open. There will be no need to drill it in!
Oh and lastly, don’t talk about contacting one’s MP and working this through politics because I’ve had more of Lazarowicz and Chisholm and Osborne and Darling and Clarke and the entire lot of them than I can take. They’re monkeys!
While, in the past when contacting the local idiots, they’ve turned and said on occasion certain things would be a matter for the police or the judiciary. It’s like watching hot potatoes being thrown from one to the other. It’s PATHETIC. And all because you’re all so afraid - FUCKING CHICKENS – to do what you know is right in any given circumstance in fear of the short term issue of losing your jobs.
Imagine the entire British police actually had fucking guts and stood together to do the RIGHT thing then you WOULDN’T lose your bloody jobs because you’d actually, as a collective, be DOING your bloody jobs! The only thing left for the corrupt state to turn to would be the army!
Argh! It’s like talking to a fucking BRICK WALL but a brick wall is smarter!
BILDERBERG: You’re finished! The problem remains however that the people behind you aren’t… yet!
Your David Rockefellers, Tony Blairs, Gideon Osbornes, Ken Clarkes, every last one of you TREASONOUS BASTARDS who have attended this organisation’s meetings for the last 60 years and pushed through the agenda (via your working groups of the RIIA, CFR, Trilateral Commission etc etc) of destroying national sovereignty, planning and executing wars worldwide, crashing the financial system for your benefit and colluding in crimes against humanity, are finished. It is time for the people to lock you all up for life. And in our language life MEANS life!
Gerard Batten MEP in EU Parliament. He’s slow though because the UK treasury has admitted through a FOI request that, indeed, policy IS discussed (therefore made) in Bilderberg meetings. Why he doesn’t just come right out and say it is beyond me!
Now, you “Detectives” out there in your airy fairy land of just doing as you’re told by a bunch of black robe wearing judicial twats and who spend your days scouring over something pathetic which pales in any significance yet is for the purpose of exposing the REAL crimes such as this – why don’t you do a job which reflects the supposed nature of your position and investigate REAL criminals? Oh but DAMN I keep forgetting it is the real criminals who control the system which you protect and that pays your wages to scour the hard drives of people like me now isn’t it? So, in fact, you’re the criminals’ protective unit. You’re the “Mafia police” in essence. Yet you expect us, the public to trust you to keep law and order? Who’s “law” and who’s “Order”?
And you know the sad thing Detective Manchester? You all seem to be doing it believing you’re doing the right thing while the very system you protect is destroying the wealth and the safety of all your own – your mother, your father, your sister, brother, cousins, friends etc. Look in the mirror bud and work it out!
Here’s a little starter for 10 for you. See how bright you are to pick up on this and do your own investigation shall we? Or is it too big and you’d rather just have an easy life behind that desk picking on the little guy? The little guy who, in fact, is the equivalent of you and yours. You just don’t get it do you Detective?
“An influential Jewish European banker reveals that the ruling elite in Europe is
now telling their minions that the West is on the brink of total financial
meltdown; so the only way to save their precious investments is to bet on the
new global crisis centered around the Middle East, which replaced the crisis
evolving around the Cold War. “
Asia Times May 2003: EE22Ak03.html
“As if an ever expanding war were not bad enough, the economic outlook
presented to the gathered plutocrats, was even grimmer since it was not overlaid
with the blustering confidence of the Washington war party. In contrast to the
geopolitical experts, who all seemed intoxicated by the omnipotence of the
U.S.military machine, the economic experts — including James Wolfensohn,
President of the World Bank, Paul Volcker the former chairman of the Federal
Reserve Board, and, of course Buffet himself — all emphasized the impotence of
monetary and fiscal policy after the collapse of one of the great speculative
bubbles of all time.
“To make matters worse, the assembled company generally agreed that America
and Britain, would soon be threatened by the new bubbles in the property
London Times Sept 2002: http://www.nogw.com/articles/rothchildmeeting.html
Now, think logically detective. How could these reports POSSIBLY have been made up as any kind of propaganda? They were YEARS before this so called “out of the blue” crash while the wars around the middle east have all come to pass as have so many others. So WHO had the “crystal ball” Detective? The reporters? Or the people in that Bilderberg meeting? It’s GOT to be one of the two right? So I’ll leave it up to the detective capabilities of the Scottish detectives themselves to figure it out. After all, by god you can “detect” me for having a bit of a ‘conflict of words’ with an alleged jew on a messageboard. Is that the best detective work you can do Detectives? We should all sleep safe and sound in our beds thenin the comfort of knowing our detectives can detect a little spat on a messageboard and get stright into action huh? Keeping the world free of corruption and crime I see! hahahaha. It’s hilarious, sorry detective but it really is!
Meanwhile, you just need to read a few things dating back into the 90s and you will see the “genesis” of all of this being prepared by Zionist neocons and Obama’s own mentor.
So here’s dear old Lord Chancellor Ken. Proven lying bastard by yours truly simply taking his words and comparing them to the reality and the words of the UK treasury. Can’t get ANY FCUKING SIMPLER than that now can we “Detective”?
But Detective, you’re not allowed to have a political opinion! That’s out of your remit! You’re forbidden from holding one and, therefore, you are simply controlled by the very people you should be enforcing the law upon! Have you ever looked up not only International law but British law regarding war crimes? If you did you would readily see that the British government (Tony Blair and now Cameron for two examples) are 100% guilty of warcrimes. Where’s the handcuffs Detective? ….. Nowhere. And you know why? Because YOU are one controlled lackey who is disallowed from intefering in politics when it is the politicians themselves who are destroying this country from the inside and out. You’re IMPOTENT man and while you steal my property, I actually feel sorry for you! You’re BLIND.
And here you have an outright confession of guilt – yes Mr Detective guilt because to state as is stated is admitting an all out attack on the sovereignty of nations. Not by tanks (unless you’re a Libya or Iraq etc) but by financial WMDs and the bribery of politicians to take the money and then legislate in your favour opposing the constitutional basis of the nation(s).
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Read again SLOWLY Detective! He says OTHERS characterize him as conspiring with others but he then states in pure hubris that he pleads guilty AND he’s proud of it!
Are you fcuking thick Detective?
If the Council as a body has stood for anything these 75 years, it has been for American internationalism based on American interests. If the Council has had influence during this period, it has derived from individual members taking the varied and often conflicting fare of Council meetings and publications to a wider American audience. From Foreign Affairs articles by W.E.B. DuBois and George F. Kennan to books by Henry A. Kissinger and Stanley Hoffmann, the Council’s role has been to find the best minds and leaders, bring them together with other Council members, and provide forum and stage.
Leslie H. Gelb
Council on Foreign Relations
Now did that say “British public interests”? No it didn’t. How fcuking clear does this have to be for you “Detectives”??
As for our War criminal extraordinaire, Tony Blair, well who do you think this guy Rockefeller is talking about when he describes himself as an internationalist and CONSPIRING with others to bring about an integrated world political and economic structure (World Government in other words run by banks and corporations and that just means purely for THEIR profit)? Well here’s an example:
And who was it that ensured our resident war criminal (who is now still being protected by you lot using OUR taxpayers money because he’s afraid the taxpayers may want his blood for the shedding of theirs due to his lies – ironic isn’t it?) got his cushy job at JP Morgan at $2M/year while it is now mainstream that Blair was in Libya during his No.10 tenancy doing deals FOR JP Morgan?
[The VERY SAME oligarch who was involved in the Rothschild/Gideon Osbourne yacht scandal just a couple of years ago! Deripaska, the Rothschild goon! Isn't it funny how Rothschild is in on the game with the very same faces influencing (and bribing) Blair, Mandelson, Osbourne - it doesn't matter who or what side of the political fence they are because politics is the sham to display to the unread and uneducated: Libyan-link-oligarch-funded-Blair-initiative.html
Behind the scenes you see on the telly and in the press, all these political whores work for the same masters and are rewarded for it. While you "Detectives" haven't a fcuking clue!]
It was the fcuking Rothschilds. Yes those same scum who own and control and first funded the set up of the zionist state of Israel. Our Tony, of course, then becomes also the Middle Easy PEACE envoy! You couldn’t make this shit up Mr Detective!!
“The event is being arranged by Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who hosts
influential gatherings for London’s elite. Those invited include at least seven
billionaires with a combined wealth of more than £25billion.
Invitations to Downing Street were given to tycoons willing to donate more
than $25,000 (£13,000) to the Tate gallery. Organisers of the event, American
Patrons of Tate, which Lady Rothschild chairs, claimed the No 10 evening is part
of wider fundraising efforts for the gallery, and that the main event will be a
dinner in Manhattan, which will not be attended by the Blairs.”
The coincidences eh? Now here’s another one:
Lord Guthrie of Craigiebank
General Charles Ronald Llewelyn Guthrie, Baron Guthrie of Craigiebank, GCB, LVO, OBE, DL, KCSG, KM, KCJCO (born 17 November 1938) was Chief of the Defence Staff between 1997 and 2001 and Chief of the General Staff, the professional head of the British Army, between 1994 and 1997.
He is a cross bench member of the House of Lords. He was created a life peer as Baron Guthrie of Craigiebank, of Craigiebank in the City of Dundee, after retiring as Chief of the Defence Staff. He was one of the several retired Chiefs of Defence Staff who spoke out in the House of Lords about the risk to servicemen facing liability for their actions before the International Criminal Court, particularly in respect to the invasion of Iraq. He has been appointed Colonel of the Life Guards and Gold Stick-in-Waiting to Her Majesty the Queen.
A Roman Catholic convert, he is a Knight of Malta and Patron of the Cardinal Hume Centre.
Guthrie was criticised in 2008 by George Monbiot for an alleged lack of understanding of international law. Monbiot based his argument on Guthrie’s September 2002 advocacy of an invasion of Iraq and subsequent comments, in which he appeared to support launching “surprise wars”, something forbidden by the United Nations charter.
And here’s the rub:
Extract from Guthrie’s comments in Parliament re the Iraq war which he fully supported:
“I ask the Minister to answer two questions that he has already been posed. First, when I was Chief of the Defence Staff, I was assured that it was unthinkable for British service men and women to be sent to the International Criminal Court. Can the Minister assure the House that that is still so?
Secondly, can the Government give serious consideration to the British Armed Forces, like the French forces, opting out of their commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights? Many of us feel that we should, in view of our experiences in Iraq.”
Obvious then that he is well aware of the breaking of International law – something he had to support for his boss Rothschild to have Blair and the British military support the imperialistic aims of the internationalists such as Rothschild and Rockefeller.
Excerpt from George Monbiot’s article in the Guardian:
Let me dwell for a moment on what Guthrie said, for he appears to advocate that we retain the right to commit war crimes. States in dispute with each other, the UN charter says, must first seek to solve their differences by “peaceful means” (article 33). If these fail, they should refer the matter to the security council (article 37), which decides what measures should be taken (article 39). Taking the enemy by surprise is a useful tactic in battle, and encounters can be won only if commanders are able to make decisions quickly. But either Guthrie does not understand the difference between a battle and a war – which is unlikely in view of his 44 years of service – or he does not understand the most basic point in international law. Launching a surprise war is forbidden by the charter.
It has become fashionable to scoff at these rules and to dismiss those who support them as pedants and prigs, but they are all that stand between us and the greatest crimes in history. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg ruled that “to initiate a war of aggression … is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime”. The tribunal’s charter placed “planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression” at the top of the list of war crimes.
If Britain’s most prominent retired general does not understand this, it can only be because he has never been forced to understand it. In September 2002, he argued in the Lords that “the time is approaching when we may have to join the US in operations against Iraq … Strike soon, and the threat will be less and easier to handle. If the UN route fails, I support the second option.” No one in the chamber warned him that he was proposing the supreme international crime. In another Lords debate, Guthrie argued that it was “unthinkable for British servicemen and women to be sent to the International Criminal Court”, regardless of what they might have done. He demanded a guarantee from the government that this would not be allowed to happen, and proposed that the British forces should be allowed to opt out of the European convention on human rights. The grey heads murmured their agreement.
International law is clear as day. While look at another “coincidence”. Guthrie argued in the house of Lords FOR the strike on Iraq in Septemeber 2002. Now re-check the Times article above regarding the meeting at Rothschild’s Waddington Manor – just so happens it was September 2002! How very predictable!
Now let’s take a look at Colt Defence shall we? Of which Guthrie is a non executive Director:
They supply just about the entire world with weapons so who is it we’re fighting? Martians? Otherwise it would appear they sell weapons to anyone and any one of these countries could stage an attack on any other, ignoring for a moment that they will be using the arms to kill their own people then Guthrie and crew say “hey you can’t do that! We sold those weapons to you to shoot pigeons!” (but then I suppose the World Wildlife Fund would be up in arms about that eh Philip?)
“Selecting the weapon that will equip a country’s Armed Forces is a crucial process with strong military and political implications; the best and most combat-proven weapon in the world should therefore be chosen. The example established by the U.S. Armed Forces and the armed forces of more than 90 other nations around the world confirms that Colt weapons significantly increase the field readiness as well as the operational, tactical and strategic capabilities of any country’s Armed Forces.”
“Prior to joining the company, Mr. Flaherty was a Managing Director in the equity capital markets origination business at Banc of America Securities LLC. Prior to joining Banc of America Securities in 2001, Mr. Flaherty was an investment banker at Credit Suisse First Boston.”
An investment banker no less and not only any old one but a Credit Suisse one! And who controls Credit Suisse? None other than dear old David Rockefeller! Now, do you think any and all wars might just be VERY lucrative for old Guthrie and the Rothschilds/Rockefellers of this world?
Now DEAR Detective. All I’m doing is researching and posting my findings online. If some unknown cyber personality then cries wolf and feigns offence while being quite happy to goad people (and there are many more) to be blunt with the little self proclaimed “jew” while he, like you, does not understand the historical and existing impact of zionism on the world INCLUDING the negative impact on the everyday TRUE jew, then that ain’t MY fault Mister!
So, if it’s your wish to continue to sieze MY property – not yours and not the British judiciary’s or the British Government’s – while you act as a protector of liars, thieves and war criminals in your ignorance, then I suggest you check the law. Your actions are both, enabling the ongoing cover up of war crimes and treason, and as a party to such, you are liable and effectively committing the crime of Misprision of Treason.
We urge all civilians to go to New Scotland yard, or their local police station to report UK war criminals, including Tony Blair, Jack Straw, Lawson and around 250 MPs who are all WAR CRIMINALS
For more information and assistance please see
List of war crimes
• The Genocide Convention, 1948.
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.
• The Nuremberg Principles, 1950.
• The Convention on the Abolition of the Statute of Limitations on War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, 1968.
• The Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War, 1949; its supplementary protocols, 1977.
But hey, Detective, there may be an answer as to why you’re pissing me about rather than investigate all of this. You see, Zionist Israel can do whatever the hell it wants it seems and when David Cameron professes himself a zionist then what do you expect huh? He even changes British law in the face of International law JUST FOR THEM! Get it? Is it SINKING IN YET?
In the UK the judicial system allowed private parties and individuals to present their own evidence of war crimes before a magistrate who could then, if he or she felt the case was strong enough, issue a warrant for the suspect’s arrest. Consequently, in 2005 retired Israeli General Doron Almog only escaped arrest by skulking in his plane before being flown back to Israel, while in 2009 Kadima party leader Tzipi Livni cancelled her trip rather than face arrest. Other senior Israeli figures simply chose to stay away from Britain.
Sadly on 15 September this means of potentially achieving justice was revoked. In response to Israeli protests the UK government chose to change its laws rather than see Israelis arrested. In a move condemned by Amnesty International, the UK government amended the law on universal jurisdiction so that in future only the Director of Public Prosecutions can authorize the arrest of a suspected war criminal (“Tories make life easier for war criminals,” Liberal Conspiracy, 30 March 2011).
Oddly, the UK government defended its decision on two contradictory grounds. The first reason it put forward is that the evidence used to secure the arrests stands little chance bringing about “a realistic prospect of conviction.”
This is disingenuous, to say the least. As Geoffrey Robertson, a UN appeals judge, states: “The change in the law has nothing to do — as the UK claims — with ensuring that cases proceed on solid evidence. No district judge would issue an arrest warrant lightly (“DPP may get veto power over arrest warrants for war crime suspects,” The Guardian, 22 July 2010).” Secondly, the reason for the arrest is so the suspect cannot flee while further evidence is being gathered. Indeed, this is a common way for domestic investigations to proceed.
The other equally disingenuous reason the UK gave for the change in the law is that arresting suspected war criminals may endanger the non-existent peace process.
This absurd view was advanced by UK Justice Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, who decried the previous law because it constituted a risk to “our ability to help in conflict resolution or to pursue a coherent foreign policy.”
Indeed, claiming that the previously granted arrest warrants had been politically motivated, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague declared, “We cannot have a position where Israeli politicians feel they cannot visit this country.”
However, the UK’s retreat from the implementation of universal jurisdiction is not a lone example of the power of the Israel lobby to affect states’ domestic legislation. A similar shameful episode ensued when Ariel Sharon was indicted before the Belgian courts, in that instance not just Israel but also the United States brought pressure to bear, Donald Rumsfeld going as far as to threaten to move NATO headquarters from Belgium.
Which raises the question, if enforcing international humanitarian law is a threat to peace, then why do we have it?
And from the Guardian:
You see Detective… these people aren’t jews they are Zionist Nazis! They are the jews’ nemesis and USE the “jewishness” to create a “shield” around themselves by bringing up the fcuking holocaust for the 2o trillionth time! While they then also evade the charge of racism as they set up a JEWISH ONLY EU Parliament!!
Jewish EU Parliament: 50141
Try THAT if you’re Christian or Muslim!
But the fact is they use this “jewish oppression” tactic over and over while, if you look at who is, in fact, manipulating and controlling all of this, these people ARE NOT oppressed. THEY are the oppressors! And neither are they JEWISH they are ZIONIST first and foremost! They’d slit a jewish throat as quickly as they’d slit yours or mine! You DON’T HAVE THE POWER to create your very own EU PARLIAMENT (contrary to any and all other accepted norms of racial equality, anti-xenophobia and political correctness) UNLESS you have money, influence and power! To suggest these people are oppressed is absolutely ridiculous! Ever heard of “A wolf in sheep’s clothing”? Ask Tony our war criminal. He knows being a Fabian!
Is all this information fcuking with your little brain Detective? Can’t process it? Is that the problem?
Be a good lad Detective. Return the almost £2grand worth of euipment you stole from me for your masters while neither you nor probably them have the slightest clue what the big picture is! After all, you’re not allowed to get involved in politics therefore you’re disallowed to catch the real fcuking criminals!
The biggest crimes of the century against humanity and all you can do is scour hard drives of a bloke who knows it.
Fcuk your idea of “law” mate. The “law” IS an ass! A very corrupt one at that!
New York City Police Foundation — New York
JPMorgan Chase recently donated an unprecedented $4.6 million to the New York
City Police Foundation. The gift was the largest in the history of the
foundation and will enable the New York City Police Department to strengthen
security in the Big Apple. The money will pay for 1,000 new patrol car laptops,
as well as security monitoring software in the NYPD’s main data center.
New York City Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly sent CEO and Chairman Jamie
Dimon a note expressing “profound gratitude” for the company’s donation.
“These officers put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe,” Dimon
said. “We’re incredibly proud to help them build this program and let them know
how much we value their hard work.”
Then LEARN Detective!…..
James Dimon is the chairman & CEO for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Bailout Company), a director at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, a corporate fund board member for the Kennedy Center, a director at the Partnership for New York City, a director at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and a director at Catalyst (think tank).
Now look up the letter “D” in the CFR list of membership and what do you get?
And look up “D” in the Trilateral list of membership:
Well would you credit it? Not only does wee Jamie come up on both BUT you also have Evelyn’s wifey Lynn come up on the CFR list.
Now ISN’T it a small world full of nothing but JUST coincidences?
To keep who safe exactly? Answer: JP Morgan, Tony Blair, Bilderberg etc etc etc
You’re bought and paid for Detective! That’s “law” for you!
Get yourself brains detectives! “That’s not a criminal conspiracy that’s just coincidence and democracy in action!”
My lilly white ARSE!
An addendum for our American cousins who read their Constitution. Here’s a man saying he supports what the Tea Party have done to HAVE Americans read their Constitution while he is a liar, a fake and breaks the Logan Act (look up your Logan Act too).
He doesn’t like to even acknowledge the word BILDERBERG. Wake the hell up America!
But I guess just as you never heeded the warnings regarding the Kenyan you’ll not heed this one either will you? They own BOTH SIDES of the political spectrum you slow minded idiots! On BOTH SIDES of the Atlantic!
We’ve been saying this for years now. Personally, I’ve been saying it since mid 2008 (yes, even to a so called “Jew” who has decided, in his ignorance - and in the British judiciary and Police force’s ignorance – to “take offence” at what I told him was the source of what was coming. Now how would I know that? While everyone else who doesn’t understand how this all works said even as recent as a year ago “That’s Conspiracy theory”) that the world monetary and economic system was going to go into meltdown. Even as the financial crisis of 2008 was happening, I was STILL stating there was far worse to come!!
So YOU tell ME you NAYSAYERS - and you ignorant fucks who don’t understand but call anyone who can see it in advance and says WHY it is happening, an “Anti semite” – how did people like me and so many others you refuse to acknowledge or listen to, KNOW this (and even more) was and is going to happen?
I’ll tell you why: Because we’ve STUDIED it all. Every little scrap of evidence and historical fact to put all the pieces together. Every bit of history that isn’t TAUGHT in our schools to ensure YOU (we) don’t understand how this fucking system works!
So then, when some of us do question and start to uncover that which has been hidden from our historical textbooks and then piece that together with facts and news of what is happening today and how Bilderberg and the Council of Foreign Relations and all the people involved in politics and banking fit into the puzzle, we get demonised as “Conspiracy theorist nutters”, “extremists”, “anti semites” and “potential terrorists”.
And YOU fucking POLICE, in your abject ignorance, just do as your told. Then let me be clear: FUCK your jobs when you lose them and FUCK your pensions! Because you DON’T deserve them you thick TWATS! You bunch of hopeless “yes sir no sir” fools!
And here is the problem world: YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO THINK NOR SPEAK FOR YOURSELF!
At least we know that the Illuminati WERE real (and probably are still!) – there are historical bloody documents even in letters written by George Washington regarding them and Adam Weishaupt and the fact they were founded on 1st May 1776
What is there for Al Qaeda? Even the bloody BBC itself admits it doesn’t exist but in the minds and database of the CIA! So please STFU when it comes to your ignorant trash about Al Qaeda having perpetrated the horrors of 9/11 and 7/7.
Take a look into the London School of Economics and London University a little deeper and note at least two “terrorists” came out of the bowels of these institutions then look at who funded them! It ain’t fcuking rocket science!
If you people out there do not see what is happening all around you then you simply must be blind!
A FOOTBALL CLUB is investigating one of its players for making a comment he believes is true (and is once you drop the shit you are conditioned with). Yet the world will laugh at him for his belief because the world is ignorant.
Ask yourself what difference this makes to Liverpool FC or his value on the park? Absolutely ZERO! The DIFFERENCE lies in there being a brave guy with a celebrity status who speaks his mind. THAT is the danger and it is THAT which Liverpool cannot have. Why? Because MONEY comes from certain sources and when the ADL (Anti Defamation League) want someone silenced because they could have many others listening to them, they make sure he’s silenced.
Now watch as this transpires. There are two options: 1. He apologises to keep his job. 2. He doesn’t apologise and he’s sacked possibly to never get a position with a club again. Perhaps a third also: It goes quiet, he spoken to quietly and he never says another word about it.
Whatever happens, this guy WILL be silenced and the zionists will have their way again.
And YOU will help it along by being ignorant of what this is all about: 9/11, 7/7, the Banking, Israel, Cameron being a zionist and having “jewish values” oh and people like me being looted by Scottish police on orders by the Metropolitan police with £2000 of equipment being robbed from me by detectives who don’t know the first thing about what this is all about but use an excuse that there was a heated debate and words on a messageboard between me and some character who decides to describe himself as jewish and being “offended” by “anti semitic” remarks while I had been posting on this topic for months before this character ever made a response.
Meanwhile, he seems to take “offence” up as a profession. These people are everywhere and will stoop to anything to “snag” you so be careful out there in cyberland – the ADL have Cameron and the judiciary in their pocket!
Now note to my boys in blue: I’m not standing under ANY twat in a robe who is simply going to act like a coercive agent for the ADL and tell me what I can and cannot say to someone who is maliciously attempting to draw me into a position where HE thinks he can then blow the whistle and have the ignorant heavies shut me up and fine me OR lock me up because they don’t know the game OR they are acting in accordance with it. Get the picture?
Now just for a second, forget the “reptiles” and the “hollow moons” etc. The fact is that this guy has done the real research on the Rothschild Zionism issue too and he’s spot on. Just a damned pity he spoils it with the former.
The FACT is that the Zionist are a bunch of genocidal maniacs with a hell of a lot of power and the American congress, judiciary and the British PM and most of parliament/Lords and Judiciary in their pockets – bought and paid for. Now if you want to come at me for saying that then you all can kiss my ass!
Max gets a blog all to himself!
Just one last thing though: To the Police “Detectives”. Go and detect some REAL crime will ya? Otherwise let me just piss myself laughing at your incompetence while you “investigate” me for having a fcuking argument! PATHETIC!
MORK CALLING ORSEN – COME IN ORSEN!
HOUSTON, THIS IS DISCOVERY, WE’VE DISCOVERED SOMETHING!
EARTH CALLING AMERICA (AND ALL OTHER NATIONS) WHY AREN’T YOU LISTENING?
Or, in other words: What the HELL is wrong with you people?
Posted by the CATO Institute (if you don’t know who they are, look them up):
Now George Osborne:
You see, what our politicians constantly refer to is the DEFICIT. The DEFICIT is simply a measure of the difference between the amount the government borrows and the income it receives from taxation etc. As you will see in the next but one video however, there are parliamentary questions which quite clearly advise you that the government never has and never will have the intention of actually paying off the NATIONAL DEBT! Yes, it is incredible isn’t it? You’re in debt yet you have no intention of ever wishing to be free of it?
There is a good reason for that. They are DISALLOWED from being free of the debt.
The government COULD issue debt free money/currency tomorrow but it chooses not to. If it did, however, the entire country could be free of debt AND the entire country would have ZERO austerity, very little tax, no cuts to services AND almost FULL employment. How about that? And it is SO exceptionally simple!
But no. They won’t do it. Why? Well that’s also very simple! Hitler mean anything to you?
And now the man who didn’t want to say “Yes” but he was pinned into a corner and had absolutely no choice because Mark Kirk and all other Senators, Congressmen and Parliamentarians know the facts. They are simply too damned scared AND/OR well paid off (bribed) to tell you.
Now, YOU HAVE BEEN ADVISED IN PLAIN ENGLISH BY THE MOST POWERFUL CENTRAL BANKER IN THE WESTERN, IF NOT ENTIRE, WORLD, THAT A NATIONAL DEBT IS UNNECESSARY.
IT HAS ALSO BEEN EXPLAINED, IN A RECENT BLOG, THAT THE ENTIRE CENTRAL BANKING SYSTEM IS IN PRIVATE OWNERSHIP!
FURTHER, THE FOLLOWING VIDEO EXPLAINS IN AS CLEAR AND SIMPLE A WAY AS I CAN THAT, AS A SINGLE ENTITY, THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT BE IN DEBT!
So, by all means, it is entirely your prerogative (just as the Queen has hers) to continue allowing yourself to be thieved from by your government, your Council and all those who simply demand, like some form of highwayman, that you hand over cash to pay taxes that are entirely unnecessary. Not only are they unnecessary but, due to the fact that it is a privately controlled cartel running a ponzi scheme to suck your wealth dry in order to increase theirs, with absolutely no MORAL legitimacy but only LEGAL (because it is these same personages who are creditors to each and every government and, therefore, they dictate what “Law” is to the debtor – the government) authority, they are substantively illegitimate, morally bankrupt, corrupt and criminal. Indeed, it is a crime on humanity what they are doing when you consider how this very same system then allows millions in Africa to starve to death and how they start wars between countries and murder millions more purely for a buck!
ADDENDUM: Dylan Ratigan MSNBC. Worth every single cent he is paid in salary! Quite brilliant and amazingly gutsy!
Roseanne Barr, on her blog, acts like a sane human and weighs up the evidence of what happened on 9/11. But, of course, because she does so, like all those who have gone before her, she gets attacked. Roseanne, you have “balls” and integrity. Nice one!
“i was warned that I will now be attacked by persons who question my integirty—this is what trying to hear fact over propaganda gets you these days–attacked. I want to understand all sides of an issue and then make up my mind—if you have something to say in counter to jon, feel free to say it here as well–let’s get to the bottom of this whole thing and see if my guess is correct—I say Bush did this, as he was instructed to do by his dad cheney and bill clinton kennedy, and everybody else whose wealth increased after 9-11. It was a red herring to empty the us coffers, to get rid of civil rights and jobs, and the working and middle classes. I know it was a big scam because after we were attacked, they sent our army away from home–instead of keeping them here to defend us. They left us here like they left the people floating away in katrina. They are using the american people as human guinea pigs for medical experiments conducted by psychiatrists. We had it too good for too long. We got lazy and stupid and obese. They are done with us now. They see us as useless eaters.”
“Who are they? They are the billionaires. They are vampires who must always get more and more–and they never get enough. They do not care that they use slaves, even if they are children. They know that the filth of the world is dumped in Haiti, and that children there are dying from dirty water, but the rich don’t care about any of that. They are addicts who need growth every quarter no matter where it comes from. Psychotics are made not born. The rich are psychotic and all on anti depressants. they hate themselves for being pig like beings, but they still act pig like. their cloven hoofs tell the tale.”
Oh but Roseanne, the epicentre is formed by people who FAR outstrip billionaires. Their $Trillions are held within “non profit Foundations” therefore they never, individually, show up on the Forbes Rich list. They are conspicuous, in fact, by their absence.
“Evidence that contradicts the ruling belief system is held to extraordinary standards, while evidence that entrenches it is uncritically accepted.” -– Carl Sagan
People have been convicted and executed on far less evidence than the 9/11 investigators have against our “benevolent” leadership and its complicity in the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent coverup — a coverup which will continue regardless of who gets elected to the White House, because who gets elected is just a dog’n'pony show to make it seem like “we” have a choice and some say in what’s going on.
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon the well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” — David Rockefeller, Memoirs, p. 405
9/11 is just one of many conspiracies going on. David Rockefeller can openly confess to a One World conspiracy, to the undermining of the best interests of the American people by his family for over a century, in-your-face got-his-jollies-from-it suck-it-cause-you-can’t-do-anything-about-it gloating, because our friends and neighbors couldn’t possibly care any less. Anyone who wants to know the truth already does — it couldn’t be any more plain.
The problem isn’t getting the information out there. It’s there. The problem is summed up by that cliché that there is none so blind as him who will not see. Until people decide that they don’t want to be lied to any more, the liars will continue to win, and the willingly-lied-to are just living in a kind of self-inflicted Matrix — no robotic overlords required.
That’s what needs to be overcome. Joe American doesn’t want to know. Ignorance is (a sort of) bliss, after all.
David Cameron supposedly retired early to bed before a raucous evening in 1987 in which the Bullingdon Club ran from the police through the streets of Oxford – according to “When Boris met Dave”, the recent TV programme.
In fact, I can reveal, the youthful Cameron was most definitely at the party. Unlike most of his friends, however, he – along with Boris Johnson and another student called Sebastian Grigg – escaped capture by the forces of law and order.
Mr Cameron’s apparent capacity to rise almost without trace is neatly embodied in the story of his early brush with the law.
The evening had ended with a pot being sent crashing through a restaurant window – sending some of the revellers, including Johnson, the future mayor of London, scurrying for safety while their less fortunate friends earned themselves a night in the cells at Cowley police station.
Many details of the evening have been kept a closely-guarded secret by the group of old friends, who have remained tight-lipped about Cameron’s involvement in the escapade.
But one former Bullingdon member recalled how the arrests took place in Oxford’s botanical gardens where – silhouetted by the lights of the police cars – the students, who had been hiding on the ground, stood up one by one.
At that point, however, Cameron had sprinted off down a side street towards St John’s Lane to make good his escape, according to the person. He said the idea that the future Tory leader was not part of the original escapade was ludicrous.
“A policy of omerta has descended on the Cameron episode. He definitely got completely clean away, so that part of it is true, but the idea that someone just went to bed early! I mean, come on….”
The former member added, ironically: “There were tiers, there was (on one hand) an advanced commitment to smashing up rooms and (on the other) there were just kind of people who went to bed early.”
Cameron has never pretended to have lived a blameless youth. “There was a time at university when lots of people drank too much and fell over, and I plead guilty,” he has said.
Yet unlike most students he seems to have had a precocious sense of how his youthful indiscretions might have an impact on his later ambitions. The episode provide a fascinating insight into Mr Cameron because it suggests that the future leader of the Conservative party was already thinking of his CV.
The old friend says that, in retrospect, it was “extraordinary” that Cameron was so determined not to be caught.
The three students who escaped were not only all Old Etonians but they already had political ambitions, standing for Parliament in 1997.
All lost in the Labour landslide. But in the early hours of that Oxford morning, the trio were “self-aware enough to know they weren’t going to be arrested”, he recalls. “Of course we all knew it was ridiculous but there was a sense of seriousness about some members of the group.”
Years later, it was quite a common joke within that circle that the three who ran for Parliament in 1997 were also the three who ran from the flowerpot incident in 1987.
They were not only the fleetest of foot – “I never knew Boris could run so fast,” the club member said – but arguably the most mature.
”Maybe we always thought we were going to be running the country, certainly that’s how we talked, in terms of which of us would be the one to lead the Conservative party when the time came,” he said.
Johnson has claimed that he was one of those to be arrested, giving vivid details of his supposed night in the cell.
In the early hours before dawn, the mayor has recalled, two policemen came to talk to the youths. “By this stage I am afraid that the Bullingdon club was very far from the proud phalanx of tail-coated twits that had set out for dinner the night before,” said Johnson. “Some of us were beginning to whimper for our mothers.”
In fact Boris was already far from the scene, according to the other former member: “It was part of his (Johnson’s) narrative to be caught… Foresight, isn’t it, of knowing that in 20 years’ time things would have changed so much that a la Bertie Wooster it would have been part of everybody’s CV to have stolen a policeman’s helmet?”
Those from less golden backgrounds disliked the elitism of the Bullingdon Club. But it was viewed by Cameron’s set as a “safe” alternative to more louche institutions such as the Piers Gaveston Society.
The japes tended to involve violence directed at furniture rather than people: ”Compared to them[the Gaveston], the Buller was respectability incarnate,” the source said. “It is a club with a great sense of tradition.”
I put this anecdote to the Tory press office, which refused to comment.
Justice will NEVER be done David until ALL the looters of this country are put behind bars and these kids have a long way to go until they match the level of looting that you, and successive parliaments for many years, have achieved in THIEVING from the taxpayer and taking your backhands from the banks and corporations who own your asses!
You want to process people? Process parliament you bunch of self serving, corrupt gits!
John, by the grace of God, king of England, lord of Ireland,
duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and count of Anjou, to the archbishop, bishops,
abbots, earls, barons, justiciaries, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants,
and to all his bailiffs and liege subjects, greetings. Know that, having regard
to God and for the salvation of our soul, and those of all our ancestors and
heirs, and unto the honor of God and the advancement of his holy Church and for
the rectifying of our realm, we have granted as underwritten by advice of our
venerable fathers, Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate
of all England and cardinal of the holy Roman Church, Henry, archbishop of
Dublin, William of London, Peter of
Winchester, Jocelyn of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh of Lincoln, Walter of Worcester, William of Coventry, Benedict of Rochester,
bishops; of Master Pandulf, subdeacon and member of the
household of our lord the Pope, of brother Aymeric (master of
the Knights of the Temple in England), and of the illustrious men William Marshal, earl of Pembroke, William,
earl of Salisbury, William, earl of Warenne, William, earl of Arundel, Alan of Galloway
(constable of Scotland), Waren Fitz Gerold, Peter Fitz
Herbert, Hubert De Burgh (seneschal of Poitou), Hugh de Neville, Matthew Fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip
d’Aubigny, Robert of Roppesley, John
Marshal,John Fitz Hugh, and others, our liegemen.
1. In the first place we have granted to God, and by
this our present charter confirmed for us and our heirs forever that the English
Church shall be free, and shall have her rights entire, and her liberties
inviolate; and we will that it be thus observed; which is apparent from this
that the freedom of elections, which is reckoned most important and very
essential to the English Church, we, of our pure and unconstrained will, did
grant, and did by our charter confirm and did obtain the ratification of the
same from our lord, Pope Innocent III, before the quarrel arose between us and
our barons: and this we will observe, and our will is that it be observed in
good faith by our heirs forever. We have also granted to all freemen of our
kingdom, for us and our heirs forever, all the underwritten liberties, to be had
and held by them and their heirs, of us and our heirs forever.
2. If any of our earls or barons, or others holding of
us in chief by military service shall have died, and at the time of his death
his heir shall be full of age and owe “relief”, he shall have his inheritance by
the old relief, to wit, the heir or heirs of an earl, for the whole baroncy of
an earl by L100; the heir or heirs of a baron, L100 for a whole barony; the heir
or heirs of a knight, 100s, at most, and whoever owes less let him give less,
according to the ancient custom of fees.
4. The guardian of the land of an heir who is thus under
age, shall take from the land of the heir nothing but reasonable produce,
reasonable customs, and reasonable services, and that without destruction or
waste of men or goods; and if we have committed the wardship of the lands of any
such minor to the sheriff, or to any other who is responsible to us for its
issues, and he has made destruction or waster of what he holds in wardship, we
will take of him amends, and the land shall be committed to two lawful and
discreet men of that fee, who shall be responsible for the issues to us or to
him to whom we shall assign them; and if we have given or sold the wardship of
any such land to anyone and he has therein made destruction or waste, he shall
lose that wardship, and it shall be transferred to two lawful and discreet men
of that fief, who shall be responsible to us in like manner as aforesaid.
5. The guardian, moreover, so long as he has the
wardship of the land, shall keep up the houses, parks, fishponds, stanks, mills,
and other things pertaining to the land, out of the issues of the same land; and
he shall restore to the heir, when he has come to full age, all his land,
stocked with ploughs and wainage, according as the season of husbandry shall
require, and the issues of the land can reasonable bear.
7. A widow, after the death of her husband, shall
forthwith and without difficulty have her marriage portion and inheritance; nor
shall she give anything for her dower, or for her marriage portion, or for the
inheritance which her husband and she held on the day of the death of that
husband; and she may remain in the house of her husband for forty days after his
death, within which time her dower shall be assigned to her.
8. No widow shall be compelled to marry, so long as she
prefers to live without a husband; provided always that she gives security not
to marry without our consent, if she holds of us, or without the consent of the
lord of whom she holds, if she holds of another.
9. Neither we nor our bailiffs will seize any land or
rent for any debt, as long as the chattels of the debtor are sufficient to repay the debt; nor
shall the sureties of the debtor be distrained so long as the principal debtor is able to satisfy the
debt; and if the principal debtor shall fail to pay the debt, having nothing
wherewith to pay it, then the sureties shall answer for the debt; and let them
have the lands and rents of the debtor, if they desire them, until they are
indemnified for the debt which they have paid for him, unless the principal
debtor can show proof that he is discharged thereof as against the said
10. If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum,
great or small, die before that loan be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest
while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall
into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in
11. And if anyone die indebted to the Jews, his wife
shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the
deceased are left under age, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping
with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid,
reserving, however, service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done
touching debts due to others than Jews.
12. No scutage not aid shall be imposed on our kingdom, unless by common
counsel of our kingdom, except for ransoming our person, for making our eldest
son a knight, and for once marrying our eldest daughter; and for these there
shall not be levied more than a reasonable aid. In like manner it shall be done
concerning aids from the city of London.
13. And the city of London shall have all it ancient
liberties and free customs, as well by land as by water; furthermore, we decree
and grant that all other cities, boroughs, towns, and ports shall have all their
liberties and free customs.
14. And for obtaining the common counsel of the kingdom
anent the assessing of an aid (except in the three cases aforesaid) or of a
scutage, we will cause to be summoned the archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls,
and greater barons, severally by our letters; and we will moveover cause to be
summoned generally, through our sheriffs and bailiffs, and others who hold of us
in chief, for a fixed date, namely, after the expiry of at least forty days, and
at a fixed place; and in all letters of such summons we will specify the reason
of the summons. And when the summons has thus been made, the business shall
proceed on the day appointed, according to the counsel of such as are present,
although not all who were summoned have come.
15. We will not for the future grant to anyone license
to take an aid from his own free tenants, except to ransom his person, to make
his eldest son a knight, and once to marry his eldest daughter; and on each of
these occasions there shall be levied only a reasonable aid.
18. Inquests of novel disseisin, of mort
d’ancestor, and of darrein
presentment shall not be held elsewhere than in their own county courts, and
that in manner following; We, or, if we should be out of the realm, our chief
justiciar, will send two justiciaries through every county four times a year,
who shall alone with four knights of the county chosen by the county, hold the
said assizes in the county court,
on the day and in the place of meeting of that court.
19. And if any of the said assizes cannot be taken on
the day of the county court, let there remain of the knights and freeholders,
who were present at the county court on that day, as many as may be required for
the efficient making of judgments, according as the business be more or less.
20. A freeman shall not be amerced for a slight offense, except
in accordance with the degree of the offense; and for a grave offense he shall
be amerced in accordance with the gravity of the offense, yet saving always his
“contentment”; and a merchant in the same way, saving his “merchandise”; and a
villein shall be amerced in the same way, saving his “wainage” if they have
fallen into our mercy: and none of the aforesaid amercements shall be imposed
except by the oath of honest men of the neighborhood.
22. A clerk shall not be amerced in respect of his lay
holding except after the manner of the others aforesaid; further, he shall not
be amerced in accordance with the extent of his ecclesiastical benefice.
26. If anyone holding of us a lay fief shall die, and
our sheriff or bailiff shall exhibit our letters patent of summons for a debt
which the deceased owed us, it shall be lawful for our sheriff or bailiff to
attach and enroll the chattels of the deceased, found upon the lay fief, to the
value of that debt, at the sight of law worthy men, provided always that nothing
whatever be thence removed until the debt which is evident shall be fully paid
to us; and the residue shall be left to the executors to fulfill the will of the
deceased; and if there be nothing due from him to us, all the chattels shall go
to the deceased, saving to his wife and children their reasonable shares.
27. If any freeman shall die intestate, his chattels shall be
distributed by the hands of his nearest kinsfolk and friends, under supervision
of the Church, saving to every one the debts which the deceased owed to him.
28. No constable or other bailiff of ours shall take
corn or other provisions from anyone without immediately tendering money
therefor, unless he can have postponement thereof by permission of the seller.
29. No constable shall compel any knight to give money
in lieu of castle-guard, when he is willing to perform it in his own person, or
(if he himself cannot do it from any reasonable cause) then by another
responsible man. Further, if we have led or sent him upon military service, he
shall be relieved from guard in proportion to the time during which he has been
on service because of us.
34. The writ which is called praecipe shall not for the future be
issued to anyone, regarding any tenement whereby a freeman may lose his court.
35. Let there be one measure of wine throughout our
whole realm; and one measure of ale; and one measure of corn, to wit, “the
London quarter”; and one width of cloth (whether dyed, or russet, or
“halberget”), to wit, two ells within the selvedges; of weights also let it be
as of measures.
37. If anyone holds of us by fee-farm, either by socage or by burage, or of any other land by
knight’s service, we will not (by reason of that fee-farm, socage, or burgage),
have the wardship of the heir, or of such land of his as if of the fief of that
other; nor shall we have wardship of that fee-farm, socage, or burgage, unless
such fee-farm owes knight’s service. We will not by reason of any small
serjeancy which anyone may hold of us by the service of rendering to us knives,
arrows, or the like, have wardship of his heir or of the land which he holds of
another lord by knight’s service.
39. No freemen shall be taken or imprisoned or disseised or exiled or in any way
destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful
judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
41. All merchants shall have safe and secure exit from
England, and entry to England, with the right to tarry there and to move about
as well by land as by water, for buying and selling by the ancient and right
customs, quit from all evil tolls, except (in time of war) such merchants as are
of the land at war with us. And if such are found in our land at the beginning
of the war, they shall be detained, without injury to their bodies or goods,
until information be received by us, or by our chief justiciar, how the
merchants of our land found in the land at war with us are treated; and if our
men are safe there, the others shall be safe in our land.
42. It shall be lawful in future for anyone (excepting
always those imprisoned or outlawed in accordance with the law of the kingdom,
and natives of any country at war with us, and merchants, who shall be treated
as if above provided) to leave our kingdom and to return, safe and secure by
land and water, except for a short period in time of war, on grounds of public
policy- reserving always the allegiance due to us.
43. If anyone holding of some escheat (such as the honor of
Wallingford, Nottingham, Boulogne, Lancaster, or of other escheats which are in
our hands and are baronies) shall die, his heir shall give no other relief, and
perform no other service to us than he would have done to the baron if that
barony had been in the baron’s hand; and we shall hold it in the same manner in
which the baron held it.
44. Men who dwell without the forest need not
henceforth come before our justiciaries of the forest upon a general summons,
unless they are in plea, or sureties of one or more, who are attached for the
46. All barons who have founded abbeys, concerning
which they hold charters from the kings of England, or of which they have long
continued possession, shall have the wardship of them, when vacant, as they
ought to have.
47. All forests that have been made such in our time
shall forthwith be disafforsted; and a similar course shall be followed with
regard to river banks that have been placed “in defense” by us in our time.
48. All evil customs connected with forests and
warrens, foresters and warreners, sheriffs and their officers, river banks and
their wardens, shall immediately by inquired into in each county by twelve sworn
knights of the same county chosen by the honest men of the same county, and
shall, within forty days of the said inquest, be utterly abolished, so as never
to be restored, provided always that we previously have intimation thereof, or
our justiciar, if we should not be in England.
50. We will entirely remove from their bailiwicks, the
relations of Gerard of Athee (so that in future they shall have
no bailiwick in England); namely, Engelard of Cigogne, Peter, Guy, and Andrew of
Chanceaux, Guy of Cigogne, Geoffrey of
Martigny with his brothers, Philip Mark with his brothers and
his nephewGeoffrey, and the whole brood of the same.
52. If anyone has been dispossessed or removed by us,
without the legal judgment of his peers, from his lands, castles, franchises, or
from his right, we will immediately restore them to him; and if a dispute arise
over this, then let it be decided by the five and twenty barons of whom mention
is made below in the clause for securing the peace. Moreover, for all those
possessions, from which anyone has, without the lawful judgment of his peers,
been disseised or removed, by our father, King Henry, or by our
brother, King Richard, and which we retain in our hand (or
which as possessed by others, to whom we are bound to warrant them) we shall
have respite until the usual term of crusaders; excepting those things about
which a plea has been raised, or an inquest made by our order, before our taking
of the cross; but as soon as we return from the expedition, we will immediately
grant full justice therein.
53. We shall have, moreover, the same respite and in
the same manner in rendering justice concerning the disafforestation or
retention of those forests which Henry our father and Richard our brother
afforested, and concerning the wardship of lands which are of the fief of
another (namely, such wardships as we have hitherto had by reason of a fief
which anyone held of us by knight’s service), and concerning abbeys founded on
other fiefs than our own, in which the lord of the fee claims to have right; and
when we have returned, or if we desist from our expedition, we will immediately
grant full justice to all who complain of such things.
55. All fines made with us unjustly and against the law
of the land, and all amercements, imposed unjustly and against the law of the
land, shall be entirely remitted, or else it shall be done concerning them
according to the decision of the five and twenty barons whom mention is made
below in the clause for securing the pease, or according to the judgment of the
majority of the same, along with the aforesaid Stephen, archbishop of
Canterbury, if he can be present, and such others as he may wish to bring with
him for this purpose, and if he cannot be present the business shall
nevertheless proceed without him, provided always that if any one or more of the
aforesaid five and twenty barons are in a similar suit, they shall be removed as
far as concerns this particular judgment, others being substituted in their
places after having been selected by the rest of the same five and twenty for
this purpose only, and after having been sworn.
56. If we have disseised or removed Welshmen from lands
or liberties, or other things, without the legal judgment of their peers in
England or in Wales, they shall be immediately restored to them; and if a
dispute arise over this, then let it be decided in the marches by the judgment
of their peers; for the tenements in England according to the law of England,
for tenements in Wales according to the law of Wales, and for tenements in the
marches according to the law of the marches. Welshmen shall do the same to us
57. Further, for all those possessions from which any
Welshman has, without the lawful judgment of his peers, been disseised or
removed by King Henry our father, or King Richard our brother, and which we
retain in our hand (or which are possessed by others, and which we ought to
warrant), we will have respite until the usual term of crusaders; excepting
those things about which a plea has been raised or an inquest made by our order
before we took the cross; but as soon as we return (or if perchance we desist
from our expedition), we will immediately grant full justice in accordance with
the laws of the Welsh and in relation to the foresaid regions.
59. We will do towards Alexander, king
of Scots, concerning the return of his sisters and his hostages, and concerning
his franchises, and his right, in the same manner as we shall do towards our
owher barons of England, unless it ought to be otherwise according to the
charters which we hold from William his father, formerly king
of Scots; and this shall be according to the judgment of his peers in our court.
60. Moreover, all these aforesaid customs and
liberties, the observances of which we have granted in our kingdom as far as
pertains to us towards our men, shall be observed by all of our kingdom, as well
clergy as laymen, as far as pertains to them towards their men.
61. Since, moveover, for God and the amendment of our
kingdom and for the better allaying of the quarrel that has arisen between us
and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, desirous that they should
enjoy them in complete and firm endurance forever, we give and grant to them the
underwritten security, namely, that the barons choose five and twenty barons of
the kingdom, whomsoever they will, who shall be bound with all their might, to
observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have
granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter, so that if we, or our
justiciar, or our bailiffs or any one of our officers, shall in anything be at
fault towards anyone, or shall have broken any one of the articles of this peace
or of this security, and the offense be notified to four barons of the foresaid
five and twenty, the said four barons shall repair to us (or our justiciar, if
we are out of the realm) and, laying the transgression before us, petition to
have that transgression redressed without delay. And if we shall not have
corrected the transgression (or, in the event of our being out of the realm, if
our justiciar shall not have corrected it) within forty days, reckoning from the
time it has been intimated to us (or to our justiciar, if we should be out of
the realm), the four barons aforesaid shall refer that matter to the rest of the
five and twenty barons, and those five and twenty barons shall, together with
the community of the whole realm, distrain and distress us in all possible ways,
namely, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, and in any other way they
can, until redress has been obtained as they deem fit, saving harmless our own
person, and the persons of our queen and children; and when redress has been
obtained, they shall resume their old relations towards us. And let whoever in
the country desires it, swear to obey the orders of the said five and twenty
barons for the execution of all the aforesaid matters, and along with them, to
molest us to the utmost of his power; and we publicly and freely grant leave to
everyone who wishes to swear, and we shall never forbid anyone to swear. All
those, moveover, in the land who of themselves and of their own accord are
unwilling to swear to the twenty five to help them in constraining and molesting
us, we shall by our command compel the same to swear to the effect foresaid. And
if any one of the five and twenty barons shall have died or departed from the
land, or be incapacitated in any other manner which would prevent the foresaid
provisions being carried out, those of the said twenty five barons who are left
shall choose another in his place according to their own judgment, and he shall
be sworn in the same way as the others. Further, in all matters, the execution
of which is entrusted,to these twenty five barons, if perchance these twenty
five are present and disagree about anything, or if some of them, after being
summoned, are unwilling or unable to be present, that which the majority of
those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly
as if the whole twenty five had concurred in this; and the said twenty five
shall swear that they will faithfully observe all that is aforesaid, and cause
it to be observed with all their might. And we shall procure nothing from
anyone, directly or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and
liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such things has been
procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never use it personally or by
62. And all the will, hatreds, and bitterness that have
arisen between us and our men, clergy and lay, from the date of the quarrel, we
have completely remitted and pardoned to everyone. Moreover, all trespasses
occasioned by the said quarrel, from Easter in the sixteenth year of our reign
till the restoration of peace, we have fully remitted to all, both clergy and
laymen, and completely forgiven, as far as pertains to us. And on this head, we
have caused to be made for them letters testimonial patent of the lord Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, of the lord Henry, archbishop of Dublin, of the bishops aforesaid, and of
Master Pandulf as touching this security and the concessions
63. Wherefore we will and firmly order that the English
Church be free, and that the men in our kingdom have and hold all the aforesaid
liberties, rights, and concessions, well and peaceably, freely and quietly,
fully and wholly, for themselves and their heirs, of us and our heirs, in all
respects and in all places forever, as is aforesaid. An oath, moreover, has been
taken, as well on our part as on the part of the barons, that all these
conditions aforesaid shall be kept in good faith and without evil intent. Given
under our hand – the above named and many others being witnesses – in the meadow
which is called Runnymede, between Windsor and Staines, on the fifteenth day of
June, in the seventeenth year of our reign.
Now go to 10.10 on this video and listen to the “great Obama” speak so glowingly about this document and about the law built up by this so called Great Britain. Go on guys – it’s first day at school. Do yourself a favour and educate yourself before bashing down doors in your ignorance of what anything and everything is about. Or am I right? You just say to your masters “Yes sir no sir three bags full sir”?
While note at the beginning of the video, the BBC gives us a shot of the Chief Rabbi (now a member of the House of Lords). Not the head of the Anglican church or Christian faith but of the Jewish faith. Yet, it would seem, that Obama’s commentary regarding the wonderful document of the Magna Carta doesn’t offend the Rabbi. Strange old world isn’t it?
You want respect? EARN IT!
But don’t go getting into any heated debates now will you? You might just find a bunch of heavies at your door treating you like some form of terrorist!