Jacob strikes again!
No, no, no, your honour. I am not implying anything at all.
I’m stating it as fact: You’re ALL on the take! And from the moment that prick Rothschild swore his Torah oath and took a seat in Parliament (and you lot changed the requirements of oath taking just for him) you were all owned.
The Trojan Horse of Rothschild. The Cabinet and majority of Lords and MPs of any use: Owned by this clan.
Mr Mike Hall (Weaver Vale, Labour)
One report that has not been referred to so far is the third report, into the mining operations of British Coal. I shall refresh the memory of those who do not remember the details of the sale of British Coal. The Government sold British Coal in December 1994 for the reported sum of £926 million. However, the PAC drew attention to the fact that the Government, in preparing British Coal for privatisation, had spent £37 million specifically on those preparations. They had spent another £582 million on minor redundancies. A post-sale adjustment to the price reduced it by £6.4 million. Another £136 million was deferred. Logic and mathematics show that the Government received only £212 million in cash for the whole of the British coal industry.
That is not the full story. Before the Government sold British Coal, they wrote off £2 billion of debt and, at the point of the sale, they wrote off another £1.6 billion. The class IV vote for 1994–95 shows that in that year the taxpayer was receiving £112 million per anum from British Coal in interest payments. The Government had only to keep British Coal in public ownership for another three years and we would have had more money in the public purse than they received for selling it—unless we take into account the fact that, because British Coal was sold, the Government were able to reclaim £2 billion from the surplus in the British Coal pension fund. Even taking that into account, by my reckoning the taxpayer is still £1 billion out of pocket. Only this month, we have heard of the problems now besetting the privatised British coal fields.
I am very concerned about the role of Rothschild in that privatisation. It was awarded a £9.1 million contract to advise British Coal on the sale. Initially, firms were invited to tender for the provision of advice on the preliminary sale. Rothschild was the preferred bidder for the preliminary work, but it was then appointed, without further competition, to advise on the whole sale. The decision was taken by the then Secretary of State for Energy, now Lord Wakeham. It was contrary to the guidelines set out in the PAC’s eighth report in 1993 about open competition for Government business. It was probably also outside European guidelines. What concerns me most is that on 20 May 1996, when we took evidence on the sale of British Coal, we were told that Lord Wakeham was then working for Rothschild.
But then money certainly does talk because, let’s face it, this is one ugly little prick:
Nat & "date": I wonder what her P&L requirements are? Or perhaps it's the asset side of the balance sheet? Or, perhaps, she's more interested in the cash flow.
Different female, same questions.
"No really, the Earth will die and us with it if the family doesn't succeed in having your governments tax you so that we can buy up large swathes of land and forest (anything woth a buck or two in fact) and "protect" it from you but for you if you see what I mean? Ah ok, for us then once we depopulate.
He wants to save the world from Plastic!
What is it with so many people that they just seem completely unable to put 2+2 together and make 4?
But sorry Nat. Even as a guy, I have to say, you got the ugly gene mate! Yer dad obviously hasn’t been too good at keeping apace with the eugenics/genetics fraternity. He’s been too busy studying the weather!
Wow, the details of what actually went on during the big sell off were not really something I was interested in at the time. Coming from a non-mining town and being more interested in being a teenager. But that’s really shed some light on it thanks. I now know why it really was such a big deal.