United Nations legalizes murder!

Yes you read that properly!

UNTIL PEOPLE START TO TAKE SERIOUS NOTE OF WHAT THESE INSTITUTIONS, SUCH AS THE UN, STATE IN THEIR “WONDERFUL” DOCUMENTS, WE ARE GOING TO GET NO FURTHER FORWARD IN ACHIEVING TRUE UNIVERSAL FREEDOMS FOR MANKIND.

A 24 year old Iraqi War veteran by the name of Scott Olsen, is currently in hospital asking himself what the hell he fought for his country for? He goes to Iraq to “DEFEND FREEDOM” (let’s ignore the joke in that statement for now) and arrives back into the bosom of safety of his home country in one piece. THEN, he is shot in the head at point blank range by Oakland California Police operating on the orders of the Oakland Mayor Jean Quan.

HOW IRONIC!

He didn’t get a “purple heart” he got a crimson skull. While his comrades are putting their lives on the line overseas for the freedom of the very small fraction of the American people (perhaps 0.01% nevermind 1%) who are globalists – they are NOT Americans whether they hold an American passport and were born there or not, America is just ONE patch of land to them and they want it all! - and who want a One World government and a One world army to protect them as they gather up continuously, the wealth of nations and the wealth of “their own” Americans. These globalists are using the UN to destroy the sovereignty of the very USA the troops THINK they are fighting for!

I think the US Marines are fighting in the wrong countries don’t you?

And HOW they can think they are fighting for American freedom is entirely beyond me. It takes some kind of pea sized brain not to see what is going on now!

But, let’s take a look at the UNITED NATIONS ARTICLES ON HUMAN RIGHTS for a moment shall we?

Section I – Rights and freedoms

Article 2 – Right to life

1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived
   of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court
   following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.
2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
   1. in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
   2. in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person
      lawfully detained; (A “lawful” arrest or a “legal” arrest? It does not state, anywhere, arrest for what? Stealing a packet of winegums?”)
   3. in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.

Now, let’s zoom in and focus on c:

WHO decides on what is termed a riot? The NYPD against Occupy Wall Street protestors? The policeman in London who killed Ian Tomlinson while the policeman was acting in a CAPACITY of Law Enforcer for the State? It was the State that murdered Ian Tomlinson! Mayor  Jean Quan of Oakland California?

OAKLAND CALIFORNIA MAYOR JEAN QUAN

No, none of them. WHO decides, once more, is Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan as they FUND the Police (essentially bribing them). The message is “Do as you’re told lads and protect our criminality and you will be adequately compensated. Therefore, you can be on the PEOPLE’S side (and good luck) or you can be on OUR side and you will keep your jobs, be adequately paid for it and you have the “law” on your side (which we write by the way) if you murder someone when we have deemed the public action a riot or insurrection.

Please READ and UNDERSTAND the following blog which attempts to illustrate, clear as day, HOW the UN and all state law, has manipulated people into subrogating their god given rights to a criminal FICTION called “legality”:

u-n-inadvertently-confirms-freeman-concept

Let me state this as plainly as possible: The United States President, Barack Obama, previous Presidents and the entire US Congress and Senate all work for the same people in power (as do the UK government).

The people in power are the lenders in a lender/borrower relationship. The lender ALWAYS is the controller just as is the case when you apply for a mortgage. The lender owns your ass until you pay back in full. This is precisely what is happening and has happened now for centuries under the PRIVATE operation and control of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank of England and the entire Central Banking system which IS in Private hands. A FACT I have shown time and again on many other logs within this overall blog.

Who are the Lenders? The BANKS. But not Fred Goodwin and the like… no no no. He’s just a monkey and wouldn’t understand this if his life depended upon it. The BANKS are the very tiny fraction of humanity who control the IMF, Bank of International Settlements, Federal Reserve, Bank of England and all National Central Banks which live under the banner of “democracy”. Those ones which don’t and are not controlled by this cabal are,,, well they used to be under the “Axis of Evil” but there’s not many left. Libya just fell for instance.

Who are the borrowers? “Democratic” governments!

This is, as an aside, why if you are corruptly thrown in jail in Syria or Sudan and any other targeted “non democratic” country, your “democratic” state will help you get released by interfering in these Sovereign nations’ legal system. IF, however, you are thrown in jail corruptly by what these “democratic states” recognise as another “democratic state” (such as, what shall we say? Singapore for example?) then your state will will NOT bat an eyelid and allow you to be corruptly incarcerated on the excuse of “We cannot interfere in another sovereign country’s legal system”. Really? You just bomb the hell out of those sovereign countries you don’t like then huh? But that’s NOT “interference” in their legal system is it?

You hypocritical, corrupt arseholes are so transparent it’s incredible!

Does Keith Olbermann understand this? These people report and they talk about left wing and right wing politics while such does not even exist EXCEPT to give the masses the IDEA they have a choice. As George Carlin once said: “You have no choice, you have owners!” When will these talking heads listen and understand? I assume never. Then, that being so, “Houston, we have a problem”.

PLEASE do your research and start to understand how an American War veteran can retun safely to the United States only then to have his skull fractured by a LEGAL BULLET from one of his own!

So, a question:

Is this what American troops are dying for? Really? This is freedom? Then enjoy your freedom!

An American gets shot by Americans. Other Americans run to help him. The Americans who shot him then attack those trying to help him.

This reminds me of something…..now what is it? Ah Yes……this:

So, sorry troops, until you wake up and attack the REAL enemy, I can only agree with the following:

WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND HUH?

WAKE UP YOU LOT WHO TAKE ORDERS BUT REFUSE TO THINK! YOU’RE GIVING HUMANITY A BAD NAME! The Aliens think we have really poor IQs. Well, I guess some of us do!

LEARN DETECTIVE MANCHESTER!

HERE IS ANOTHER “ANTI SEMITIC” RANT FROM YOURS TRULY DETECTIVE!

BUT THE “ANTI SEMITISM” (as you are forced to understand it) IS NOT FROM ME BUT FROM JEWS!

WORK IT OUT DETECTIVE!

MEANWHILE, TELL YOUR BOSSES AND THAT STUPID FUCKING JUDICIARY TO SHUT THE FUCK UP WHEN THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT. OR PERHAPS THEY DO KNOW, WHICH IS QUITE FEASIBLE, AND JUST WISH TO SHUT ME UP?

WELL I AIN’T SHUTTING UP FOR PRICKS!

AND AS FOR THE MET POLICE: WELL I BETTER NOT THINK OF ATTENDING A PROTEST AT ANY POINT HUH? OR I MAY JUST END UP LIKE IAN TOMLINSON. MURDERED BY THE STATE IN FACT BECAUSE THE RPICK WHO HIT HIM WAS WORKING IN MUCH THE SAME CAPACITY AS YOU AND, AS YOU KNOW, YOU CAN DO WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WISH WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE STATE.

STATE THUGS: PROTECTED WHILE YOU HAVEN’T A FUCKING CLUE HALF THE TIME WHAT AND WHO YOU’RE DOING IT FOR!

SO EITHER CHARGE ME WITH SOMETHING OR TAKE A HIKE AND, BEFORE YOU DO, RETURN MY FUCKING PROPERTY! THIEVING BASTARDS!

But if you DO charge me with something you better be able to back it up in front of an OPEN jury because I refuse to attend ANY and ALL “in camera” summary trial to enable you to HIDE your shit or make excuses that it is not in the “public interest” coz that’s ALL BULLSHIT. Justify logically and be prepared to open it all up to the media and population and allow me to tear your corrupt “law” apart. THEN I’ll attend. But only for the purpose that YOU have my property and I intend getting it back in the same condition in which you STOLE IT!

Further, you bring an INJURED PARTY and if you can’t then all bets are off.

And while you’re at it, tell that Uncle of the paedophile and Mark Lazarowicz from me that they are a couple of paid off, owned, controlled prats who don’t have the mental capacity to fill the roles they are in!

This is getting TEDIOUS Detective. CHARGE ME or return my goods with an expressed apology and we’ll call it quits. After all, you don’t have a fucking clue what you are doing and are just doing as you are told. But NEXT TIME, think before you drill in someone’s door. Oh and another thing, try using the bell/buzzer next time so I know it’s you ok? I don’t like knocks at my door out of the blue when I have a bloody intercom whereby you could have made your presence known. Would have made the drilling unnecessary then don’t you think?

Or did you case the joint beforehand and come to some sort of wild conclusion I may be an armed terrorist?

BLOODY IDIOTS!

By the way Detective Manchester, I’m speaking to you in your CAPACITY as a Police Officer NOT as a bloke, human being, man. Comprende? You might actually be a decent bloke for all I know but as an officer you’re just one of the “Yes sir No Sir” gang.

Have to add though, one of the other guys with you was a little “jerky” let’s say. Was he the one I heard you or someone tell to calm down?

So here’s the list of property you stole:

One desktop PC, including keyboard (but you left monitor and cables)

One Windows laptop

One Macbook (15″ monitor version): Brand new condition in full working order. Including entire music collection, personal legal documentation, movies, my own musical work and includes a music studio which I use a great deal, personal documents, personal photos etc.

One 40GB Hard disk (blue Western Digital) Memory practically full with the above documents etc.

One mobile phone sim card.

One digital  camera memory card.

One Camcorder tape (of your visit).

One Boss 4 track handheld portastudio and MP3 player (including a full audio recording of your visit).

One Sony stereo microphone (why you needed that is anyone’s guess unless you enjoy recording yourself).

Meanwhile, if you suggest you were/are looking for any and all documents or downloaded evidence of somehow proving I am some sort of danger to the community then I wonder why you and your buddies never took masses of files and documents from a cabinet that it seems you did not even search which is FILLED with documents. Any one of which could have had some “hate” literature contained within. Very strange you didn’t bother to go through all that. It would appear, then, that your entire purpose was simply to remove any and all capability I had to express myself.

You think I’m THICK Detective?

Norman Scarth/ Sabine McNeil WILL NOT LISTEN!

The episode of Norman Scarth being held for contempt in a British jail for 6 months (then being reduced to 3 months when he was released) and now, Maurice Kirk being imprisoned (for what precisely?) are both examples of how the State, using the power and authority we have all transfered to them by way of our registering our births, use NOT LAW but LEGAL STATUTES against us for having the audacity to demand honesty and accountability of those who are, IN FACT OUR (yes OUR) Public servants!

Norman Scarth: WW2 Veteran and Anti Judicial corruption campaigner. Every bit a hero in fact!

Here is the current issue with Maurice Kirk:

A letter from Norman Scarth to Governor Booty of HMP Cardiff

From: Mr. N. Scarth, Associate of the Article 6 Group.

To: Mr. Richard Booty, Governor, HMP Cardiff

(Tel: 02920 923 100. Fax: 02920 923 318):

Dear Governor Booty,

We ask that you ensure this document reaches Mr. Maurice Kirk (held captive in your establishment) without delay. IT IS NO EXAGGERATION TO SAY IT COULD BE A MATTER OF LIFE OR DEATH.

Mr. Kirk,

We understand you are not eating, & have lost 11 kilograms in weight since your incarceration. It is a common misconception that as you are not eating, there will be no food in your alimentary tract. This is not so. With no incoming food, that which is already in the tract remains static, becoming progressively firmer. It can become impacted, with serious consequences. Like you, I have some veterinary knowledge, & have had to deal with newly born foals who often suffer from this condition (liquid paraffin often worked with them, linseed oil with older animals). .

WE URGE YOU TO TAKE A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF SOME LUBRICANT – BUTTER, MARGARINE OR SUCH LIKE.

Back to The Governor.

Mr. Booty,

You must be aware that Mr. Kirk is suffering unbelievable persecution from what PURPORT to be the ‘Forces of Law & Order’ (acting for the most ulterior motives). “Nothing to do with me” you may well say, “I just do as Ordered by the Judiciary”. I remind you that the Nuremberg Trials brought a ruling that ‘Obeying Orders’ was no defence for acting against humanity.

Prisons are not ‘Holiday Camps’ as we are constantly told by the Press. As you may well know, Martin Narey, one-time head of the Prison Service told of “A litany of failure & moral neglect” in “Hell Hole prisons” Fn1. On TV on 22 July(?) 2001 General Sir David Ramsbotham (now Lord Ramsbotham) spoke of ‘barbaric prison guards” (he had just been sacked from his position as HM Chief Inspector of Prisons).

I sincerely hope that your establishment is not such a place, & that you will show your own humanity in this matter.

You & the Prison Doctor have authority to release Mr. Kirk on humanitarian grounds (at the time of the Suffragettes, there was what became known as ‘The Cat & Mouse Act’, whereby the starving women were released, but then incarcerated again after they had recovered strength). As this telephone does not receive incoming faxes, we would be grateful if you would reply by email to

enscarth@hotmail.com

Yours faithfully,

Norman Scarth, Associate of The Article 6 Group,

36 Anvil Court Chambers, BRADFORD BD8 7QW

Tel: (01274) 541 213. Email: enscarth@hotmail.com

PS: David Wilson one-time Prison Governor, now a Professor of Criminology at Birmingham University, expressed the view of many that prisons are a very expensive, but quite ineffective way of dealing with crime. Apart from which, Mr. Kirk is definitely NOT a criminal. His treatment is attracting attention from abroad: Britain should look at herself before expressing outrage at Human Rights abuses in far off lands

NS.

Norman’s letter: 11-10-21-kirk-govfax.pdf

There is a petition for Fair Trials and Compensation which Norman and Sabine have initiated through Victims Unite. In it they state:

“HM Partnership” has omitted Article 13 from the UK Human Rights Act 1998. In the European Convention for Human Rights, Article 13 guarantees an effective remedy before national authorities, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.

ECHR Articles:

The Go Petition: 40825.html

Now, given Article 13 of the ECHR has been omitted in the UK Human Rights Act 1998, it is obvious to me that this may have been an additional reason for the UK government to allow my own coercion and incarceration by an overseas court having no jurisdiction (proven and details/explanation available) in a case related to myself a few years ago. It fits exactly for I was advised by the FCO when I first contacted them that I should contact a lawyer in the country I was in and take the issue through the Court of that country. This the FCO advised me, of course, before I explained to them it was not a private or corporate attack on my Human Rights but an official/judicial one. At that point, they dropped the ball. THEREFORE, it is crystal clear that “HUMAN RIGHTS”, according to the government of the United Kingdom, do not exist. This is clear official/state/judicial tyranny where the law does not apply to them ONLY us!

So what is it I am stating Norman. Sabine and everyone else who keeps complaining and trying to plead with this corrupt LEGAL SYSTEM are ignoring and refuse to listen to?

Well it is this: The FACT – plain and simple – that the ONLY reason (and therefore justification) this corrupt regime is able to do what it is doing to people is because people have transfered their authority and power TO the corrupt regime by way of the registration of their birth. AS IS DOCUMENTED AS CLEAR AS DAY BY THE UNITED NATIONS ITSELF.

Please READ the following blog:  u-n-inadvertently-confirms-freeman-concept

Now for some inexplicable reason, Sabine McNeill and others have a mental block against what is clearly and unambiguously illustrating a solution to this entire problem while they keep banging their heads against a brick wall trying to use a corrupt system and its procedures and rules to plead with it to stop implementing its corrupt procedures and rules. It is fundamentally STUPID to do this but will they stop for a MOMENT to listen? NO! Why? Don’t ask me!

What they are doing, if you will excuse the “Star Wars” reference, is like pleading that the Emperor demands Darth Vader to stop choking you to death.

Again, it is like treating symptoms instead of eradicating the disease!

UNDERSTANDING THE BIRTH REGISTRATION AND WHAT IT HAS DONE IS THE SOLUTION!

YOU MUST THROW EVERY PERSON BEHIND THIS ISSUE AND ATTACK THIS SYSTEM ON THAT BASIS.

For goodness sakes use your brain. In the ECHR Articles they even have this:

“Considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December 1948;”

Now, STOP for one second and re-consider the UN statements made in the blog cited above:

It says – ” This Digest examines the situation of children who are denied a fundamental human right and who, in legal terms, do not exist”.

Now consider that CAREFULLY as you read the Articles of the ECHR such as:

Article 1 – Obligation to respect human rights

The High Contracting Parties shall secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in Section I of this Convention.

Section I – Rights and freedoms

Article 2 – Right to life

1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived
   of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court
   following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.
2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of
   this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than
   absolutely necessary:
   1. in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
   2. in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person
      lawfully detained; (A “lawful” arrest or a “legal” arrest? It does not state, anywhere, arrest for what? Stealing a paket of winegums?”)
   3. in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection. (So WHO decides on what is termed a riot? The NYPD against Occupy Wall Street protestors? The policeman who killed Ian Tomlinson while he was acting in a CAPACITY of Law Enforcer for the State? It was the State that murdered Ian Tomlinson!)

Now just fully recognise what the UN/State are saying here in plain language: “It is a human right (LEGALLY speaking remember and remember you have subbrogated your rights TO them LEGALLY) to live EXCEPT where the UN/State think it was fair enough to kill you. WE have allowed them to create these “legal rights” on our behalf and it is in that ignorance that WE have allowed Ian Tomlinson’s (and so many others’) deaths. So if anyone is murdered during a riot (or what THEY decide to term a riot) and that murder is carried out by a representative of the state, then it is acceptable.

Or what about this one:

Article 12 – Right to marry

Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to found a family, according to the national laws governing the exercise of this right.

Now give THAT some thought rather than just read “Well of course we should all have a right to marry, would you disagree?”

THINK about it: Marriage is nothing more than a LEGAL CONCEPT put in place by the state. It is ONCE MORE a CONTRACT and through registration of your marriage you are ONCE MORE handing authority and power to the State to intervene (and it does) if the marriage breaks down. The CONTRACT is not between you and your spouse! Do you SERIOUSLY need a contract to love the person you love? THINK about all of this! Do you SERIOUSLY need a CONTRACT to have a family and to love, protect and care for that family?

A pre-nuptial agreement is a contract between you and your spouse BUT even those are very often ignored by the state even when it is a deliberately entered by both parties agreed contract! Now why would the state ignore that? Because this is ALL about state control and the shaping of society BY the state and we know “the State” or, if you wish to consider it the government, is owned/controlled by the Bankers. The bankers pay, bribe, coerce, blackmail for the legislation they wish to see. If prenuptial agreements were accepted fully then the state would not make the immense amounts of money it does through divorces.

AND NO! I AM NOT SUPPORTING THE BREAKDOWN OF THE FAMILY UNIT. IT DOES NOT BREAK DOWN IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. DO THEY HAVE CONTRACTS? IT IS THE STATE (WHEN YOU STUDY THIS MORE DEEPLY) WHO ARE DRIVING THE BREAKDOWN OF THE FAMILY UNIT.

So, OF COURSE the “Human Rights Act” is going to state everyone has the right to enter into a contract with the state! But, again, to do so, you must be recognised by the state and LEGALLY EXIST.

ARE YOU BEGINNING TO SEE AND UNDERSTAND THIS NOW?

YOU ARE ASKING THE DEVIL TO ACT LIKE JESUS! YOU ARE ASKING DECEPTION TO STOP DECEIVING YOU!

The UN is stating very clearly and precisely that these children who have not been REGISTERED as having been born, have NO RIGHTS under “the rule of law”. The truth is that EVERY HUMAN BEING BORN ON THIS EARTH HAS RIGHTS- UNALIENABLE RIGHTS and we need NO person nor organisation anywhere to BESTOW these rights upon us OTHERWISE (and here is the RUB) we are subrogating our GOD GIVEN rights from the moment we are born and we are doing it through the deception OF the State, the government, the ECHR, U.N. etc and THEY know it!

Subrogation is the legal technique under common law by which one party, commonly an insurer (I-X) of another party (X), steps into X’s shoes, so as to have the benefit of X’s rights and remedies against a third party such as a defendant (D). Subrogation is similar in effect to assignment, but unlike assignment, subrogation can occur without any agreement between I-X and X to transfer X’s rights.

They have created a LEGAL system which they apply to your LEGAL PERSON, which you have allowed to be deceptively created. Within that legal system, then, they create the rules to their liking and YOU cannot complain because you have registered and subrogated your rights to them – or at least that is how they act upon it in your ignorance. They are using TRUST law but they are CORRUPTING IT to their benefit.

The following quote most certainly applies in this situation:

“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.”
―      Albert Einstein

Sabine McNeill: Victims Unite!

So FOR GOD’S SAKES SABINE – LISTEN! You put a lot of FINE work into what you do but you are working HARD but not working SMART! You are putting so much effort into fighting symptoms!

THIS IS NOT “ROCKET SCIENCE” SABINE. THE EVIDENCE AND PROOF OF THIS IS IN THE UN’s OWN WORDS. NOW GATHER UP THE NUMBERS AND ATTACK THIS CORRUPTION FROM A VERY STRONG POSITION USING THEIR OWN WORDS TO DESTROY IT!

INSODOING, YOU ARE NOT DESTROYING THE LAW, YOU ARE EXPOSING THEN ERADICATING THE CORRUPTION OF THAT WE KNOW IA NOT LAW BUT IS A CONSTRUCT OF A LEGAL SOCIETY USED AS A CONTROL MECHANISM TO FURTHER THEIR OWN AGENDA!

You can rest assured that even many magistrates and/or judges (and certainly a Barrister I met previously) haven’t even given this a moment’s thought. They just implement rules. They don’t THINK about the validity of those rules and “laws”.  God help the poor souls they’re minds are so full of junk trying to retain and remember all the rules of this law they have been taught that they don’t have the space to consider this. But this IS reality!

U.N. inadvertently confirms “Freeman” concept

THANK YOU U.N. YOU COULD NOT BE MORE CLEAR!

I have seen this blogpost now go viral and have read many comments on it from various other blogsites. Many people are speaking about the dangers of leaving the system and also the benefits of having no Birth registration. I would, therefore, ask the reader to read very carefully what is being said because, in fact, there is no need to leave the system. There is no need for having no birth certificate and having no conferred benefits. There is only ONE need to be stated ON the birth certificate to “kill” the issue of the state and the legal UN articles which are corrupt and deceptive. That statement is provided as an addendum at the bottom. It is simple and entirely effective but ONLY when the human race understands what has occured. We live in this “democracy” (and to the US reader, democracy was NEVER what your founders intended) which deems that the majority rule. If the majority are ignorant and uneducated about what is written here and are unable to grasp the reality and logic of it, then we will never get the mass of people to demand the statement – and what it means – to be inserted.

However, there is one other point I wish to make: OWS need to understand this because this is at the heart of everything. If they do not understand this then they are throwing rocks at a machine and the machine will prevail.

I have been studying this issue for some time now and while I have to state I do not perceive myself as a “Freeman” simply because I do not align with any particular movement, I have, in the past few years, been compelled to look at what it is that gives an entirely corrupt government and judiciary (and it is I can assure you) the “power” to consider themselves the authority by which they can introduce any and all “law” that they wish which, many times, impinges upon personal freedoms from freedom of speech to smoking to how fast you drive your car to coercing you to pay taxes. Let me explain in a short couple of sentences why I took this path:

I went before a court which I then proved, a year or two later, never had jurisdiction in a case. According to THEIR own law, there were two conditions, either one of which which would allow their jurisdiction and neither one was satisfied by either party and the COURT AND LAWYERS knew this all along! They didn’t care but became incensed I found out and decided to coerce me at Supreme court level. I have all the proof of this and, at the time, I gave it to the British government (FCO). I received a letter from Meg Munn saying they would do nothing for me even though it was a direct assault on my human rights. This court was going to jail me (with no record and based upon “contempt because I exposed their corruption in court) for a second time unless I handed over my ENTIRE wealth to the other party. I had advised my lawyer to go into court and strike the whole proceedings and while he accepted that I was right, he refused to do so because it would embarrass HIM AND embarrass the COURT. He obviously had words with the opposition lawyer about my findings and with the court and it was, at that point, the coercion began. I was to “negotiate and do a deal” with the other party who had perjured themselves in court and in affidavits over and over again (seen and accepted by the court but ignored) otherwise I was going to jail again for not abiding with a court order which, I had proven, was based upon false evidence. The FCO, then, were going to allow another court to abuse my human rights when it is their stated principle to uphold the human rights of every UK citizen. Why were they willing to do this? The excuse was because they could not interfere in another sovereign nation’s legal system. I hope you realise what a joke this is! It all depends upon which country’s legal system they are being asked to interfere with. If it is Syria’s or Sudan’s (and THEY are sovereign nations) then it’s ok. If it is a country accepted by the west (which it was) then no, they won’t. The hypocrisy and corruption is so obvious to me now. It ended then, with me literally running for my life (I know it sounds dramatic but it is fact), jumping on a plane back to UK and finishing the whole thing off in the Royal Courts of Justice. Faced by a lawyer and barrister who laughed when I entered court saying I was representing myself. They were not laughing at the end of the day however when I explained the entire jurisdiction issue. The barrister had written to the court in England saying they had jurisdiction to hear the case because the two parties were domicile in England. When I pointed out to him that the other party was asking the court to uphold the other country’s court order which had assumed jurisdiction being held in the other country based upon DOMICILITY there, the barrister realised he was whipped! Here is where it gets interesting: The result was that, in absolute fact, the other party to the case is now an unrecognised bigamist. That is what our “law” allows!

“Domicile” and why that Barrister shit himself: set15

But then that Barrister, himself, broke the law by not advising the Court (The Royal Courts of Justice indeed) that the overseas proceedings were entirely null and void and that, now with re-marriage, the other party is a bigamist because the original divorce was illegal! Nice eh?

So, back to the issue:

It would seem strange that the U.N. itself could possibly confirm something as “bizarre” as a Freeman concept, I agree, but one only needs to read the following and, hopefully, if you have a logical mind, you will appreciate it quite clearly.

The U.N. states:

“Registration means proof of legal identity. It is vital for securing recognition before the law, protecting rights such as inheritance and making children less vulnerable to abuse and exploitation.”

“Under international law then, every child is entitled to registration of their birth, including children born to irregular migrants.”

20-22.pdf

Now, please consider carefully, the word “entitled” above. It would sound like an offer, a choice wouldn’t it? “You are entitled to such and such if you so choose to accept”. But the reality is that, in each state/country, you HAVE no choice. The State will punish ANY parent who, on your behalf as a baby, does not wish to CONTRACT with the state. The State’s propaganda machine, however, is great and the ignorant populace will be led to believe you are, somehow, abusing your child. They will say “we cannot confer benefits on this child because LEGALLY, it does not exist” Therefore, you as a parent will be demonized.

Again, directly from the U.N.

“The child who is not registered at birth is in danger of being shut out of society – denied the right to an official identity, a recognized name and a nationality. In 2000, an estimated 50 million babies – more than two fifths of those born – were unregistered. These children have no birth certificate, the ‘membership card’ for society that should open the door to the enjoyment of a whole range of other rights including education and health care, participation and protection.
This Digest examines the situation of children who are denied a fundamental human right and who, in legal terms, do not exist”.

UNCF Innocent Digest No.9 March 2002:  birthregistration_Digestenglish.pdf

So there you have it in the UN’s own PLAIN language: In LEGAL TERMS they don’t exist. IF then, in legal terms, they do not exist then, by definition, the legal world can have NO AUTHORITY over them. They are EXPLICITLY saying this. There is no room for misinterpretation. It is precise. The UN and legal world spell out the ADVANTAGES of having a birth certificate (all the benefits) but not the DISADVANTAGES which they trust you will not even begin to consider.

“The value of birth registration continues to be overlooked, according
to the report. It says that registration is a critical measure to
secure the recognition of every person before the law, to safeguard
the protection of his or her individual rights, and to ensure that
any violation of these rights does not go unnoticed.”

Child-rights@hrea.org: msg00069.html

“Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child. This paper emphasizes that, while a person’s name may be their most distinctive “mark” of individuality, additional information – such as age, family ties and nationality – promote the child’s right to legal protection by parents and by the state.”

“every child is entitled to State protection against exploitation and abuse. In the case of the unregistered child, however, he or she has no guaranteed protection of a specific national jurisdiction.”

“Birth registration is a permanent and official record of a child’s existence. It can be generally defined as the official recording of the birth of a child by some administrative level of the state and coordinated by a particular branch of government. Registration at birth is a fundamental human right that confers a distinct legal identity on every child.“

“Ideally, birth registration is part of an effective civil registration system that acknowledges the existence of a person before the law, establishes his or her family ties and tracks the major events of that individual’s life, from birth, to marriage and parenting, to death. A fully functional civil registration system should be compulsory, universal, permanent and compulsory.”

“A birth certificate is the most visible evidence of a government’s legal recognition of the existence of a child as a member of society.”

“In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, for example, Palestinians have been motivated to register their children in order to establish legal identity. On the basis of this registration, identity cards are issued which designate whether the child was born in Gaza, the West Bank or Jerusalem. This in turn establishes categories of the population subject to controlled mobility, leading to stigmatized treatment and additional discriminations.”

“….without a birth certificate it is difficult for an unregistered child, or that child’s family, to seek legal redress.”

“Experience from the field indicates that the registration of every child is a practicable possibility, even in challenging circumstances. To give just one striking example, in Afghanistan, between May and October 2003, a total of 775,000 children were successfully registered, representing 97 per cent of the target group of all girls and boys under one year of age. This was achieved using trained volunteers who accompanied polio vaccination teams as they made house-to-house visits to immunize young children.”

The entire document is very well worth a read but I think we get the picture very clearly Council of Europe.

3_WEB%20E%20Rep.%2012.pdf

Now, I am NOT suggesting that people should not register their child’s birth. No, no no. What I am saying is that EVERYONE should understand, from this, that the existing corrupt system – top to bottom – which allows some to “break the law” (such as elites, wealthy, corporations – who are considered ‘legal persons’) is using the registration of your birth – WHICH IS ACTUALLY A TRUST SET UP BY YOU AND THE STATE WITH YOU AS SOLE BENEFICIARY, THEREFORE, YOU and ONLY YOU, dictate how that trust operates and what its “laws” are – uses it AGAINST YOU where and when it sees fit. And they will and DO use it corruptly particularly if you prove to be an “annoyance” to them.. You have to understand that statute law (the legal world) requires consent and they ASSUME you have given them consent to act ‘on your behalf’ because you have been REGISTERED with the state – just as you register your car and the state (DVLA) has been given authority by YOU to tow away your car – which then allows them to ACT upon your person in accordance with ANY and ALL statutes that they see fit. But this is in YOUR IGNORANCE of how this deception works.

By registration of your child, you have entered – and entered them – into a contract with the state which SUBBROGATES their inherent, god given, human rights which are UNALIENABLE – UNLESS you subbrogate them! This has been done deceptively, fraudulently because, as with ALL CONTRACTS, one must be afforded FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE TERMS. YOU WERE NOT GIVEN FULL DISCLOSURE OF WHAT THE RESULTS OF YOUR ACTIONS WERE BY REGISTERING THE BIRTH!

“Let he who allows himself to be deceived, be deceived”

So consider this because this is the result of the population’s ignorance regarding how the birth cerificate and REGISTRATION of your child is actually used against you. You give the state the power and authority to remove your child from you in precisely the same way you give the DVLA power and authority to remove your car:

The bottom line is this: While it is right that all children should live in safety, be registered, be confered the benefits of society – education, the necessities to operate in the world etc. The states are using “carrots” of benefits (which, in fact, as we are seeing are a huge cost to each individual in society because, as you know, being part of that society and a taxpayer for instance, has you liable for the losses of the banks) to ensure you register your child and hand authority to the state which then allows the state to use the legal system against you. Before you transferred authority to the state, your child (and you) had unalienable rights bestowed only by God. You were a completely free human being only limited by the true law (no harm, injury or loss to another human being). Since contracting and registering for all those “benefits”, the LAW SOCIETY, on behalf of the State, has removed, deceptively, all power from you and DO NOT, in fact, bestow upon you, the man or woman, human rights because you already HAVE rights which can never been taken from you AS a man or woman. Neither does the state abuse your unalienable rights because you have effectively transfered the authority to them to act upon your LEGAL PERSON. You have created a LEGAL PERSON. A LEGAL FICTION with which you play in the “game of life” like the piece you use in monopoly. That piece is not YOU but you control the piece and if you did not have it you would not be able to play the game. That is PRECISELY how your Birth Certificate (Registration with the state) is being used. That is your game piece in the game of life and it is being deceptively used against you.

So what is the solution? Have no birth certificate?

No. The solution is that we put the State on notice that we now appreciate what they have been and are doing and we advise them, very clearly, that it is fraud and deception on their part and we are now taking control over our trusts. The registration of your birth created a trust (even though you nor your parents thought of this or considered it, you just did what everyone has done). The TRUSTEES of that trust are the public servants. Public servants serve the PUBLIC. YOU are the public and the Judge, Police, government are YOUR servants. GOD KNOWS they do not wish you to understand this but I think the above makes it quite clear.

They treat YOU as a trustee in YOUR ignorance. You are NOT the trustee, you are the BENEFICIARY of that trust and as such, only YOU can appoint the administrator of it. The Judge is acting as administrator in your ignorance. YOU need to advise him/her that he/she is WRONG.

The U.N. has given you absolute confirmation here that it is the birth certificate and ONLY the birth certificate which creates a legal personality which the legal world can recognise an act upon. If they cannot confer benefits on you because you are not recognised legally, then they cannot POSSIBLY argue that they can hold you to legal statute law. Common law yes – absolutely. No harm, injury or loss and there MUST be an injured party. But other than that, they have NO authority over you.

THIS IS WHERE FREEDOM AND TRUTH BEGINS. THIS IS NOT ABOUT HAVING THE ABILITY TO BREAK THE COMMON LAW. THIS IS NOT ABOUT HAVING THE ABILITY TO CAUSE HARM, INJURY OR LOSS. THIS IS ABOUT REMOVING THE SUBBROGATION OF YOUR RIGHTS BY A CORRUPT SYSTEM WHICH IS ABUSING ITS POWER.

Now, here is another interesting comment in the UN digest document:

 ”Similarly, an unregistered child is unlikely to be able to obtain social protection from the state. In Israel, the fact that many Palestinian children born in camps are unregistered seriously jeopardizes their access to Israeli public health and welfare services”.

It would be funny if it wasn’t so sick!

WHAT DOES YOUR ZIONIST/JEWISH VALUES SAY ABOUT THIS CAMERON? "It's ok the kid had no birth certificate so didn't exist"?

Consider this seriously for a moment: Is it possible that, due to the lack of legal recognition and, as the UN has stated, these children DO NOT LEGALLY EXIST, that to massacre such children AND adults is no crime at all legally?

DO NOT THINK THIS IS A FLIPPANT REMARK!

Think about this. HOW does a Palestinian child (or parent) or a person from a country or region (think native peoples – Papua New Guinea etc) bring a charge of murder or genocide or any charges into a court of law if they have no STANDING because they have no birth certificate therefore, no legal identity? How does a people then find justice? Answer: THEY DON’T. There IS no other mechanism.

So think of the massacre of native American Indians by those who stole their land. Those who stole the land were recognised in “law” as existing. They HAD birth certificates. The British system would, therefore, consider these “savages” as non-existent. If they did not exist in law then they both, could not be confered benefits NOR would anyone miss them or be able to act LEGALLY on their behalf. So, we massacred nobodies. In legal terms IT DID NOT HAPPEN! THINK about that!

But here’s another thing: While the UN and the state say you cannot be given any benefits – and let’s take health and medicine for a moment shall we? – if you do not have a birth certificate and therefore, do not exist. DO YOU THINK FOR ONE MOMENT THAT, IN PALESTINE AND ELSEWHERE, THESE CHILDREN AND ADULTS ARE EVER TURNED AWAY FROM HOSPITALS WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF NATO or AMERICAN/BRITISH or ISRAELI BOMBS? DO YOU?

So then you tell me? WHO is the most humane? Those who would turn their backs on their people because they LEGALLY DO NOT EXIST such as that which the UN and western states subscribe to? Or those who see a human being suffering and the LAST thing they think about is “Do you have a birth certificate?” and “Do you have enough of these “bills of exchange” to pay to live? Quite literally then, the western idea is of having a Health service which acts as a “Highwayman” – “Your money or your life!”

To further point to the seriousness of that earlier remark think of slavery. Think of American Black slavery. They were not recognised as people with rights BUT, while all that changed and they were then conferred benefits of statehood, allowed passports, “given” rights through their registration, do you think for one moment that the same group of elitist psychopaths were going to make everyone equal?

“We have stricken the (slave) shackles from four million human beings and brought all laborers to a common level not so much by the elevation of former slaves as by practically reducing the whole working population, white and black, to a condition of serfdom. While boasting of our noble deeds, we are careful to conceal the ugly fact that by an iniquitous money system we have nationalized a system of oppression which, though more refined, is not less cruel than the old system of chattel slavery.”
- Horace Greeley – (1811-1872) founder of the New York Tribune

No. They then used and abused the system of registration which they “wrap up in ribbons” with nationality and passports and driving licences, education, health etc while, quietly they are using it to tax you, to fine you and to suck the wealth from humanity deceptively.

“The money power denounces, as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes.”
- Democrat Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan.

They STILL have their slaves because they set the system up to ensure it.

So Morgan, if you ever stumble across this, give it some thought!

Morgan Freeman: The blacks achieved their freedom? No, they were just added to the "herd".

ADDENDUM 8th Nov 2011:

While I understand fully, people suggesting such as “bringing the system down” etc in their heartfelt anger about this massive con on the human race – and it is – I do not believe in bringing the system down because it would simply result in an unholy war and millions of deaths. For what?

The “system” has been built by us. The system is actually, basically fine. What is wrong is the corruption of that system by nothing more or less than the manipulation of law by those who hold the wealth which they have accumulated across centuries by ensuring the corruption of the system. It is necessary to expose and destroy (peacefully) these people’s grip on humanity by their having bought politicians and governments to install the legislation they have wanted for the purposes of societal control.

Specifically with regard to the birth registration issue. It is easily dealt with. The solution is:

“In signing this birth certificate as a RECORD of birth ONLY, I, as sole beneficiary of this trust, do not subrogate any and all god given rights of the child”

And for my atheist friends, of which I could be considered one, do not get caught up and pedantic by the use of the term “god given”. Whether you see them as god given or not, you surely understand you have, and should have, unlimited rights fom the moment you are born. Please read the supporting comments to this which were written over two centuries ago by Thomas Paine within his book “Rights of man”. You can find the link to the post on the right hand side column.

Colonel Edward Mandell-House:

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living.

They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the
bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.

They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.

After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly.

The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our
dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

- Letter from Rothschild Agent Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921] found in Wilson’s personal diary/logs

I take no quote as being a fact unless it can be supported by source documents (as is the UN statement herein). So I cannot claim to know the certainty of the above quote which has been published widely across the internet. If anyone can confirm by way of providing a copy of the original source (Woodrow Wilson’s diaries) then such would be quite an incredible find which goes even further (if further were needed) to confirm the content of this post. However, I must add that, while I recognise the extreme arrogance of these people in what others have said, which have been solidly confirmed, I find it difficult to believe that anyone would be QUITE so arrogant and, frankly, stupid, to write such as this in a letter to the President of the United States. If this were to be proven as factual, then these people are even more stupid than I give them credit for!

I cannot access this to check. Perhaps someone else can or find the source document elsewhere:  papers

ADDENDUM 30th November 2011:

Once this entire issue is grasped by the reader then, like me, you will probably find that you stumble across so many things which just verify it over and over (if such were needed). For instance, the Thomas Paine book I stumbled over just a few days after writing this initial blogpost. Now, today, this interesting (largely forgotten and much unused word) element came to my attention -

Origin of terms ‘Negro’ and Afrika

By Dr. Kwame Nantambu January 09, 2007
According to Anthony T. Browder in From ‘The Browder File: 22 Essays on the African-American Experience’ (2000), “…the Portuguese were the first to enslave Afrikans and they were the first to call them Negroes. When the Spanish became involved in the slave trade, they also used the word Negro to describe Afrikans. Negro is an adjective which means Black in Portuguese and Spanish. But since 1444 and the beginning of the slave  trade, the adjective Negro became a noun and the legitimate name of a  newly enslaved people.” (p.1).
The fact of the matter is that under Euro-centrism, “…the word for Black was typically associated with aspects of death. The word death is derived from the Greek word Necro which means dead and is similar in sound and meaning to the word Negro.”
As part of “the manifestation of the evil genius of Europe,” Euro-centric thought process deceitfully juxtaposed the words “Necro” and “Negro”. “…to reference the physical, spiritual or mental death of a person, place or thing.” (Ibid).

0901.htm

I trust you recognise how this fits in precisely with the above discussion re the benefits and emancipation of blacks once they were legally recognised by the state. They then LEGALLY existed whereas, beforehand, they were “negro”, DEAD. They were effectively dead due to their non legal existence! It then became unacceptable AND illegal to use the term “nigger” and/or “negro” because, effectively, they were no longer such! A good thing you would say (and anyone would agree) BUT, as you already have read, it was anything but emancipation. If anything, they were promoted to “debt slave” like the rest of us rather than “dead slave”.

ADOLF HITLER DID NOT WANT WAR!

 

I have NEVER been a fan of Hitler nor the Nazis, nor the IRA or any Dictator during the vast majority of my life. Who the hell would be if they were sane individuals?

But, in recent years – just the past handful – I have researched so much into history and particularly hidden history and peered beneath the surface because I was compelled to do so by events which unfolded in my own life and left me speechless about the lies, deception and guilt of my own government, judiciary and western governments in general, that my entire belief system has been turned inside out. I have to say that this “research” of mine has not been minimal in any shape or form. It has been wide and deep and has taken up 4 solid years of my life (luckily I have immensely enjoyed it) and the blinkers are off and the eyes are wide open.

I can’t point the reader to every single book and text and paragraph and documentary that I have read or watched, nor regurgitate the entirety of the hours and days I have spent reading congressional and parliamentary minutes so as to crystallize everything which has led me to the conclusions and statements I make in my blogs. I would love to write a book but it would be enormous and I wouldn’t know where to begin (or end), This jigsaw puzzle is just so immense such that it involves every single subject associated with life and history and sociology itself. I have two degrees: In Physics and in Business studies which took 6 years in total to complete but, incomparison to the time I’ve spent on this in the past 4 years, those studies were “part time”. If there was such a thing as a PhD in this overall subject, I’d have two of them by now!

So, what I write and blog about is really just short insights into subjects I have looked at and, for everything which I do post, I expect the reader, if they are interested either to confirm for themselves or for the purpose of challenging and denying, to research for themselves.

Not wishing to offend anyone but the more I read and learn of this character, the more I admire him and disbelieve the absolute shit we have been conditioned into believing of him. Further the more I understand of the zionist creeps, liars and thieves in our own governments and establishment, then even more to I admire this guy for his achievements. So very similar to Gaddafi’s. There is no doubt that we have been seriously deceived.
And no, I am no Nazi but I seriously question whether it would have been a bad thing.

Of course, from the amount I have to say negatively about Zionism – and those who would wish to consider this to mean all jewish people and is just a “front” for an assumed “Nazi” to be “anti semitic” – and now praising, or at least admitting admiration for Adolf Hitler, those who would wish to label me whatever will. For those people let me be blunt: I do not give a FCUK any longer. Your perception is just that and is coloured by what you wish to believe and your own prejudices.

So with that, I ask you to listen to this video speech by Adolf Hitler where he, in his own words, makes it quite clear that he never wished for war with America and had not with Britain either.

 

Now, of course, you are going to suggest “well that’s Hitler talking – a crazed genocidal dictator” etc etc. He lied.

Ok, sure I understand that. After all, that’s what we have been led to believe for decades. I don’t know about you though but I wasn’t born until well after the war and yet, what I see from “our side” re Hussein, Gaddafi etc, is a solid block of bullshit. Why should it have changed?

So here is someone else saying, concretely, Hitler did not wish for war with Britain:

“I received a telephone call from my friend ‘Putzi’ Hanfstaengi, who was at that time Hitler’s personal private secretary and court jester. He told me that the Führer had been reading my speeches with interest, and would like to see me at his headquarters in the Esplanade Hotel.

It is true that when I walked across the long room to a corner in which he was sitting writing, in a brown shirt with a swastika on his arm, he waited without looking up until I had reached his side, then sprang to his feet, lifted his right arm, and shouted ‘Hitler!’; and that I responded by clicking my heels together, raising my right arm, and shouting back: ‘Boothby!’

I talked with Hitler for over an hour; and it was not long before I detected the unmistakable glint of madness in his eyes. I was much impressed by his grasp of Keynesian economics at that time. He said that I was quite right about economic
expansion, and the means by which it could be achieved. But he added that this was now a political crisis, and that political forces would bring him to power. “After that,” he said, “I shall bend economics to my will; and I have in my hands the necessary instrument, a man called Schacht.” He had no sense of humour. He asked me how I would feel if Germany had beaten us in the last war, and driven a corridor between England and Scotland. I said: “You forget, Herr Hitler, that I
come from Scotland. We should have been delighted.” He did not smile. Instead he brought his fist down with a crash on the table and said: “So! I had no idea that the hatred between the two peoples was so great.” Perhaps this was one of the reasons why he sent Hess to Scotland in 1940, for I am sure that he did; and why he never bombed Edinburgh.

I then asked him, point-blank, what he was going to do to the Jews. I thought Hanfstaengi was going to faint, but only a flicker of irritation crossed his face. After a moment he said: ‘There will be no pogroms.’ I think that, at the time, he probably meant it. He had already planned to take over the whole of central and eastern Europe, and intended to deport all German Jews to those countries. What I cannot bring myself to believe is that he was unaware of what Himmler ultimately did to them.

That night I thought long and earnestly about the interview. I came to the conclusion that his plans were far more advanced than I had thought. He did not then wish to attack Britain and the British Empire, or even France. What he was determined to do was to bring the whole of central and eastern Europe under German control; and for this purpose Austria, and above all Czechoslovakia, were the key points”.

From Lord Boothby’s biography: “Recollections of a rebel” 1978. 

Boothby, while a homosexual and having a relationship with Ronnie Kray while the British government hushed it all up and told the Met Police to lay off – thereby allowing the Kray twins to carry on for another few years (says a lot about how the Police are controlled by a corrupt government doesn’t it?) – there is hardly any reason for him to lie about the intentions of Hitler when he was so ardently opposed to the regime and any threat to the British Empire. Yes they still spoke of the British Empire in those days because, in fact, that Empire still exists today but simply in another form and it is based upon the money power. Always was. Adolf was a serious danger to that money power as was Gaddafi today. 

So. What are you going to do? Say on one hand that people have freedomm of speech and of expression and when they encounter factual data which has them form their own conclusions which don’t quite agree with those the government demand they should have, you act in the very same way that you try to teach the population that this guy acted with his population? So it goes something like this: “Listen, if you start talking about a fascist dictator like he wasn’t quite a fascist dictator then we will come and shut you up and shut you down so that you cannot express freely your beliefs or conclusions but WE’RE not fascist dictators!”? Is that what you’re saying Officers?

YOU FCUKING JERKS!

Don't let the bastards close you down!

Yes, that’s my MAC Officer. And YOU fcuking stole it! In total about 2 grands worth. You fcuking THIEVES! You ignorant dirty fcuking thieves make me sick with your ignorance and your excuse of “just doing our job”. You fcuking STOLE my property based upon BULLSHIT! And I intend getting it back and in poerfect working order or you will fcuking pay for it!

Ken Clarke: Proven liar himself wants to have “secret evidence”

Ken Clarke, a now proven liar himself to the point of outright treason, is putting forward plans to allow “secret justice”. You understand what this means don’t you? It means that IF the government, judiciary, intelligence services wish to have you put away, they can and will with absolutely no proof – no REAL proof which can be scrutinized by anyone but the State’s own paid lackeys (who just do as the State wants and pays them for). This means that you can become a political prisoner in this country based on pure hot air. This is the old Soviet Union and it is encroaching further and further on civil liberties.

This country’s population needs to understand that the legal system is NOT LAW. Understand that this system is corrupt to the core and it uses your BIRTH CERIFICATE and the TRUST which has been set up by you and the state to have you “play in the game”. You need to understand that your human rights ARE NOT written on a piece of legal paper, whether that paper is the European Court of Human Rights OR the UN. NONE of it is REAL! Your Human Rights are given to you by God. Every living soul has them and not one man (or organisation) is above the other in law.

Would you be able to provide secret evidence to just a judge and forget the jury and simply state it was fact without any analysis and proof by other interested outside parties?

KEN CLARKE IS DOING EXACTLY WHAT HIS BILDERBERG MASTERS WISH HIM TO. HE’S FREE TO BECAUSE WE ALSO HAVE A PM WHO IS A COMMITTED ZIONIST. WE HAVE A JUDICIARY WHICH, WHEN YOU GET TO THE UPPER ECHELONS, ARE AS CORRUPT AS THE REST AND PLAY THE GAME. THEY ARE IN THE ELITIST SPHERE AND, AS SUCH, NONE OF THIS SHOULD IMPACT THEM OR THEIR FAMILIES. SO THEY DON’T ROCK THE BOAT. THEY WANT TO MAINTAIN THEIR POSITIONS.

BUT GET THIS IN YOUR HEAD: THIS IS BEING PROPOSED BY A PROVEN LYING CRIMINAL BASTARD WHO IS SEELING YOU AND YOUR COUNTRY OUT TO THOSE WHO PAY HIM WELL.

STOP THIS BASTARD AND PUT HIM IN JAIL!

Ken Clarke: Britain's very dangerous Bilderberger.

 

Now this guy may have the appearance and “joviality” of an “Uncle Ken” and a buffoon but let me make this clear, this guy is FUCKING DANGEROUS!

 

Ken Clarke’s plans for ‘secret justice’ face rebellion in House of Lords

 

By Andy McSmith

Friday, 21 October 2011

// Ken Clarke has been warned that his plan to allow secret evidence in civil court cases and inquests faces a revolt in the House of Lords – unless he can show that the  purpose of the measure is to protect the public.

 The Justice Secretary wants the Government to have the power to rule that evidence based on information from intelligence sources can be introduced in secret in cases like that of the former Guantanamo Bay internee, Binyam Mohamed, who was one of 16 former prisoners paid damages by the Government to avoid court battles.

Officials claim privately that the Government could have won some or all of those cases in court if it had been able to produce all the evidence it held, but much of it was highly sensitive intelligence material. Still, some lawyers believe the Government would have lost the cases anyway, and that the proposed changes are being brought in to protect the intelligence services rather than the public. Ken Macdonald, a Liberal Democrat peer and former Director of Public Prosecutions, predicted a rough ride for the proposals when they reach the Lords, with its high proportion of lawyers.

“Parliament will want to scrutinise this very, very carefully,” he said. “The main thing is going to be whether evidence is being presented in secret to protect the public, or because it would be embarrassing to the security services and the Government is trying to save its blushes.

“The thing is to produce legislation that clearly distinguish between the two and that whatever the Government does falls on the right side of that line.”

 

The UK Treasury PROVES that Clarke is a LYING SON OF A BITCH! There are NO Ifs buts or maybes about this any longer!

THROW THE BASTARD IN JAIL! DECEPTION IS FRAUD AND AT SUCH A LEVEL, A MAN BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR COURTS AND JUDICIARY FOR GOD’S SAKES AND WORKING WITH A GROUP DEDICATED TO DESTROY NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, THE MAN IS A FUCKING TRAITOR AND IMMENSELY DANGEROUS TO THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY!

NOW TAKE THE WAX OUT OF YOUR FUCKING EARS BRITAIN!

New World Order MURDERERS! by Lizzie Phelan

To the family Rothschild

To the family Rockefeller

To the family Warburg

To the British Royal Family

To the British Government, British Judiciary, Police and Armed Forces

To Goldman Sachs

To JP Morgan

To Tony Blair, David Cameron and to all the Zionist pigs who make up this NWO worldwide.

YOU MURDEROUS BASTARDS WILL COME TO A STICKY END AND THE WORLD LOOKS FORWARD TO IT.

 

 

 

Al Qaeda given free pass to London Olympics!

Do you know that according to MI5, the ONLY groups to describe THEMSELVES as “Terrorists” have been The Stern Gang and The Irgun?

Is stating this “anti semitic”? Is it? For I simply pull this information from the pages of a book entitled “In defence of the realm – A history of MI5″. I suggest, then, that it is the authors of this book and MI5 which the Zionist Israeli state, ADL and/or our own internal Zionists, namely Cameron, Hague etc, take to task. I am but a messenger. But then they shoot messengers don’t they?

Why do I say they shoot messengers? Well, it’s like this: When terrorism strikes, it is rare that the building or area it strikes ever sees any casualties in the “top brass”. Think of 9/11: The alleged “Plane” didn’t hit the side of the building where all the top brass like Rumsfeld and Co were stationed, it hit a little “backwater” on the other side.

The Irgun were responsible for the first terrorist action in history when they bombed the King David Hotel in Jerusalem in July 1946, which was the British Government headquarters in Palestine. Yet, strangely, once more, not a single high level official was killed or even hurt in that blast.

No the people who matter are never killed in these “tragedies” just as Larry Silverstein didn’t go to breakfast that fateful  morning of September 11th 2001 and the JP Morgan employees who mattered were told to attend their meeting, originally set for the towers, in offices further up the street while others were left to die.

Or just like Benjamin Netanyahu on the day of the 7/7 London bombings being told to stay in his hotel room just across from one of the tube stations when he was due to attend a meeting.

And so many more but all just “coincidence”. I am a lover of “Coincidence Theory” aren’t you? The vast majority of government, intelligence and the sleepy little public are. Why not join them? The world is such a sunny place if you do UNTIL YOU’RE BLOWN TO SMITHEREENS!

The Irgun or Irgun Zevai Leumi to give it its full title, was a Zionist paramilitary group that operated in Mandate Palestine between 1931 and 1948. It was an offshoot of the earlier and larger Jewish paramilitary organization haHaganah. When the group broke from the Haganah it became known as the Haganah Bet, or alternatively as haHaganah haLeumit or Ha’ma’amad (Hamas? ;-0). Irgun members were absorbed into the Israel Defence Forces at the start of the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

The Irgun was a political predecessor to Israel’s right-wing Herut (or “Freedom”) party, which led to today’s Likud party. Likud has led or been part of most Israeli governments since 1977.

The Irgun disagreed with the policy of the Yishuv and with the World Zionist Organization, both with regard to strategy and basic ideology and with regard to PR and military tactics, such as use of armed force to accomplish the Zionist ends, operations against the Arabs during the riots, and relations with the British mandatory government. Therefore the Irgun tended to ignore the decisions made by the Zionist leadership and the Yishuv’s institutions. This fact caused the elected bodies not to recognize the independent organization, and during most of the time of its existence the organization was seen as irresponsible, and its actions thus worthy of thwarting. Therefore the Irgun accompanied its armed operations with public relations campaigns, in order to convince the public of the Irgun’s way and the problems with the official political leadership of the Yishuv.

Menachem Begin: Leader of Irgun Terrorists and Murderers becomes Leader of Israel.

In late 1943, Menachem Begin accepted his position within the Irgun, a new leadership was formed.  Begin even assumed a Rabbi’s identity (“Yisrael Sasover”), and was sometimes known as “Ben Ze’ev” or “Dr. Kenigshopper”. Now imagine a terrorist going on to become the Prime Minister of the UK! But no, strike that. You don’t have to imagine it, we’ve already got it and had it. The present one even declares himself a Zionist with “jewish values” for christ’s sakes! LOL You couldn’t make it up!

David Cameron: Advises Israel Likud leadership that he is a Zionist and has their values and becomes PM of the UK. First job: Destroy Libya.

Now, Begin became PM of Israel leading the Likud party. Yitshak Shamir (ex Stern Gang leader) and Ariel Sharon also. Today we have Netanyahu and Tzipi Livni. ALL of them leading a Likud Party government and all of them coming into politics via an IDF which had embraced the terrorists that were Irgun (and Stern Gang). Furthermore, when considering the Stern Gang, consider this:

"I'm Bibi Netanyahu and I hope you hate Gazans too! The world may try to stop us but we own the US Congress!"

Lehi (Stern Gang) assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, and made many other attacks on the British in Palestine. It was described as a terrorist organization by the British authorities.Lehi assassinated United Nations mediator Folke Bernadotte and was banned by the Israeli government. The United Nations Security Council called the assassins “a criminal group of terrorists,” and Lehi was similarly condemned by Bernadotte’s replacement as mediator, Ralph Bunche. Lehi and Irgun were jointly responsible for the massacre in Deir Yassin.

Israel granted a general amnesty to Lehi members on 14 February 1949. In 1980, Israel instituted a military decoration, the Lehi ribbon. Former Lehi leader Yitzhak Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel in 1983.

IN 1980 ISRAEL INSTITUTED A MILITARY DECORATION, THE LEHI RIBBON – TO COMMEMORATE TERRORISTS AND MURDERERS OF BRITISH POLITICIANS! THEY THEN ALLOW THESE MURDERERS TO BECOME LEADERS OF THE ISRAELI NATION!

In 1980, Israel instituted the Lehi ribbon, red, black, grey, pale blue and white, which is awarded to former members of the Lehi underground who wished to carry it, "for military service towards the establishment of the State of Israel".

And even until today, the Likud celebrate that murder while our government lick their arse to the extent that they have even amended our “laws” to ensure that not one member of the Israeli government can be arrested for warcrimes. You see, “law” in this country is only what they wish it to be and there was a little loophole they had to fill to protect the guilty:

Then, of course, you had Yitzhak Rabin. A jew yes, a Zionist? Perhaps in HIS definition but certainly not in the definition of the Likud Party, The Stern Gang, Irgun etc. So he’s assassinated by the obligatory “Lone Gunman”. It just so happens, however, that the very person he tells his plan to was an Israeli Secret Service guy! Funny then how the Israeli secret service did not/could not simply stop him from carrying the threat out now isn’t it? We foil all sorts of “conspiracies” to murder, terrorise etc and here we have someone actually stating his intention but no, not this time – it goes ahead anyway!

During his years as an activist, Amir became friendly with Avishai Raviv, to whom he revealed his plan to kill Rabin. While Raviv posed as a right-wing radical, he was working for the Shabak, the Israeli secret service.

Funny how the intelligence agencies ALWAYS come into the picture now isn’t it?

You NEVER get a PM or a President assassinated if he calls the Armed Forces to destroy a sovereign country based upon outright lies but, you have a leader who is going to have peace break out and BANG! He’s dead from a lone gunman’s shot! Everytime. Without fail! And we STILL suck it up!

Yitzhak Rabin: No "Zionist" in the true, occult meaning of the word.

So, anyhow, “Al Qaeda given free pass to Olympic Games”?? Are you crazy?

Well no. I’m anything but while the “Coincidence theory” proponents of this world will suggest so – a little like that idiot Nick Pope.

Who IS “Al Qaeda”? PLEASE don’t tell me you are still believing in the fairy stories of Muslim shepherds on horseback and shadowy sandal wearing, cave dwelling (caves that didn’t exist) bearded “ghosts” crying “Allah Akhbar”.

Please don’t tell me you believe in men, who are intelligent enough to not only fly planes and get passed the most severe security apparatus in the world but also are LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS students, that have a whole life ahead of them but they choose to commit suicide. I mean what the hell are you if you do believe this SHIT? As gullible as a 4 year old who believes in Santa and the Tooth Fairy for god’s sakes?

The laughing gnomes (or patsies). I wonder where they are today? Bullet in the head or on a beach somewhere with their CIA money and Sangria? Or were they, in fact on a guided "missile" even though they weren't listed on the passenger manifests?

Do you really believe this shit? Then seriously – go see a psychologist!

Let’s try to be adult here – by adult I mean use one’s god given brain and logic. “Al Qaeda” is and always was a construct of the Intelligence services. At the heart of those intelligence services are the CIA, Mossad and MI5/MI6.

Going back to the “Defence of the Realm” book once more. Another interesting little nugget in that book was the following: It stated that it was not until 1998 that MI5 first managed to get a recording of Bin Laden’s voice – As if Bin Laden was some kind of “ghost” who had never been heard of or seen before. You are meant to ignore or forget the fact that Bin Laden had been working for the CIA for years beforehand and that Zbigniew Brzezinski, among others, had met and spoken with him as far back as the early 80s when. while being supported by CIA, Bin Laden was providing support to the Mujahidin in their fight against the Russians. But just forget all that. MI5 states in a book that it was they who finally got a recording of Bin Laden’s voice. The next point then is strange because, all of a sudden, after it taking an eternity to find a voice recording of Bin Laden, it was ONLY then that they then say “Al Qaeda” was invented. I guess this is because the recording had Bin Laden say “I will call my nasty terrorist group “Al Qaeda” in memory of the original CIA database of all our names in the Mujahidin. Just don’t call me Tim”.

Another strange thing happened once MI5 found that recording. All of a sudden (and remember I am only regurgitating from the book) all of this “intelligence” started spurting forth about this group called “Al Qaeda”. All of a sudden. “Al Qaeda” was plotting everything from attacking the USA with chemical, biological and nuclear weapons to blowing up the public toilets outisde Highbury stadium because they also found out Bin Laden was a Man U fan! Or perhaps that was a mistranslation! MI5 agents refuse to comment on the grounds of national security!

So, again, how is it that “Al Qaeda” is being given a free pass to the London Olympics?

Well here’s why: They aren’t called the ZION Olympics for nothing…..

Mossad helps UK secure Olympics

Israeli secret service participates in
drill that simulates 1972 terrorist attack on Jewish athletes in
Munich

Yaniv Halili

//

Mossad officials participated in a security drill at London’s Olympic Park
last weekend.

A source at the British Cabinet told Yedioth Ahronoth that the drill
simulated a terrorist attack on athletes, similar to the one that occurred in
the Munich Olympics in 1972, when Palestinian terrorists took over the building
where the Israeli delegation was staying, and killed 11 of them.

The UK’s entire defense establishment, including the emergency services,
participated in the massive drill, which was held secretly by the British
Defense Ministry.

But British intelligence officials were not satisfied, and invited their
Mossad counterparts to share their experience.

The drill simulated a scenario where athletes are held hostage by terrorists.
A large part of the exercise took place inside the park’s residential buildings,
under live fire. The village was surrounded by guards who kept out
onlookers.

A source at the British Olympic Association said that “certain Israeli
elements are advising us on securing the Olympic games.” Israel is considered an authority on urban warfare.

Coming your way London: You can be sure Israel will pick up a few valuable "gold medals" at this year's games. Just perhaps not on the track and field events. Perhaps the shooting though!

The UK has allocated nearly a billion dollars for the security of the
athletic event – more than 10% of the event’s budget.

Last weekend’s drill is the first in a series exercises that are expected to
take place in the coming month. The British defense establishment is also
preparing to deal with attacks on other Olympic facilities and on the streets of
London, which will be flooded with tourists come next July.

YNet News:  0,7340,L-4067585,00.html

And you wonder why we have this: 

And this:

But, you say, “It’s just showing respect!”

Yes, I say, but if you were being given $millions to show your respect wouldn’t you?

Work it out! It really isn’t rocket science!

Imagine if Halliburton had had a document or documents pertaining to the possibility of an event taking place in the Gulf of Mexico on a BP rig, written just a year or so prior to the event taking place and they said “We always plan for certain scenarios”, it would just be accepted as coincidence. This is the problem. For so many, no matter what you show, no matter how factual it is (like all the references to 9/11 before the event) they will say “coincidence”. We live among madmen and idiots.

You can’t ignore predictions like these of 9/11 and 7/7 (but what am I saying? You do!) while there are now similar being suggested for the 2012 Olympics and when you have David Cameron adding in Surface to Air missiles as a defence screen for a sporting event and you have Mossad and FBI etc etc getting in on the act, if YOU wish to go within 100 miles of London that’s entirely up to you.

But I’m sure it’ll be a blast!

Is Gideon Rachman a twat?

It’s one of his pieces and you just can’t get anymore willfully ignorant than this (if that is, indeed what it is)………..

Revealed: the hidden story behind conspiracy theories

By Gideon Rachman

Published: July 31 2007 03:00 | Last updated: July 31 2007 03:00

Conspiracy theorists have a bad reputation. They are usually portrayed as  paranoid, isolated, deluded people, best avoided.

It is true that there are many sinister and unpleasant conspiracy theories.  These are usually the ones that seek to blame all the world’s ills on a single  racial or social group – Jews, Catholics, Freemasons.

But there are also conspiracy theories that are delightfully dotty. A friend  in Ankara tells me many Turks are convinced that, during the cold war, the  Russians infested the Sea of Marmara with a sturgeon-devouring predator that  sent these valuable fish fleeing into the Russian bit of the Black Sea – thus  allowing the Russians to control the world’s supply of caviar. That is a theory  worthy of James Bond.

The idea that conspiracy theorists are an isolated bunch, on the fringes of  society, is also wide of the mark. Some theories are so widely believed that  they are now almost mainstream. A recent BBC opinion poll suggested that only 43  per cent of Britons accept the official verdict that the car crash that killed  Diana, Princess of Wales, was an accident. The countless “9/11″ conspiracy  theories also have a surprisingly wide audience – even in America. A Zogby poll  last year found that 42 per cent of Americans think the US government is  “covering up” facts about the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001.

Why do conspiracy theories command such a wide audience?

I have my own theory about that. There are four environments that

help to create and sustain paranoia about secret plots. There are closed  societies – typified in the Middle

East. There are divided societies, such as the US and Spain. There are  countries with a genuinely conspiratorial elite, such as Russia. And finally,  even in government, there are certain types of people who are natural conspiracy  theorists.

The Middle East is particularly fertile ground for people peddling theories  about plots. Ahmad Ashraf, an Iranian academic, says that Persians “have relied  on conspiracy theories as a basic mode of understanding politics and history”.  Given their history, this is understandable to a degree. There really was a  successful Central Intelligence Agency plot to overthrow the Iranian government  in 1953. Other Middle Eastern countries have similar tales to tell. The  Anglo-French Suez invasion of 1956 fits the narrative of a conspiracy theory  very neatly – there was a secret agreement and the official reason for the  intervention was a pretext.

But there is also something internal to Middle Eastern countries that may  foster conspiracy theories. A friend who visited Egypt after 9/11 reported back  that he could find almost nobody who believed that al-Qaeda had carried out the  attacks. My colleague thought that it had something to do with not having a free  press. If you start from the notion that the mainstream news is nonsense, then  almost anything could be true.

But if censorship promotes paranoia in the Middle East, how does one account  for the popularity of conspiracy theories in the US? Bumper stickers that  proclaim: “I don’t believe the liberal media” reflect the deep mistrust and  political divisions between liberals and conservatives. Who knows what The New  York Times or CNN are concealing for their own nefarious, liberal reasons?  Perhaps it is those UN-controlled “black helicopters” buzzing around in the  skies.

In Spain, the wounds of the Spanish civil war lie just beneath the surface of  democratic politics and left and right still seem capable of believing the very  worst of each other. Both sides have given vent to some pretty scurrilous  theories about the “real story” behind the Madrid terrorist bombings of  2004.

Perhaps the most conspiratorial places that I have visited are Russia and  Indonesia. In both places, the legacy of dictatorship and the existence of  powerful secret services have created a deep belief that there is always a  hidden narrative behind the official story.

Russians of all political persuasions often seem to react to any news event  by asking: “Who benefits?” So if opponents of President Vladimir Putin gain  credibility and sympathy because some of them have been murdered, perhaps Mr  Putin’s opponents have actually organised the killings themselves? And if  President Putin launched the Chechen wars after terrorist attacks in Moscow,  perhaps the Russian government itself was the hidden hand behind the  explosions?

Many Russians and students of Russia believe these theories. This can create  a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you believe that the other side is engaging in  nefarious conspiracies, it would be foolish not to do a bit of plotting and  provocation yourself.

All this suggests that conspiracy theories flourish above all among the  powerless or in undemocratic countries. But even powerful people in the free  world can be drawn to conspiracy theories. A long career in the intelligence  services can sometimes drive people slightly potty. James Jesus Angleton, a  famous head of counter-intelligence for the CIA during the cold war, eventually  came to suspect that the heads of several allied governments were KGB agents. He  compared the effort to foil Soviet espionage with being trapped in a “wilderness  of mirrors”.

When powerful people begin to see hidden narratives and plots around them,  the consequences can be dangerous. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, one of my  more conspiratorial pals told me: “Iraq did this. Take a look at Laurie  Mylroie’s book.” So I bought a copy of Ms Mylroie’s work, Saddam Hussein’s  Unfinished War Against America.

It attempted to prove that the Iraqis had been behind numerous terrorist  attacks on the US, including the first assault on the World Trade Center in  1993. But even more interesting than the contents of the book were the glowing  endorsements on the back – from people such as Paul Wolfowitz, then number two  at the defence department and Richard Perle, then chairman of the Pentagon’s  advisory board. The Mylroie thesis has now been widely debunked. But – at a  crucial moment – some important American officials bought the theory that Iraq  was the hidden hand behind terrorist attacks on America.

Many conspiracy theorists are convinced that there is a secret story behind  America’s decision to invade Iraq. It is also possible, however, that America  went to war partly because some senior officials had themselves fallen prey to a  conspiracy theory. But perhaps I am getting lost in the wilderness of  mirrors.

FT Article:  abb89ef0-3efe-11dc-bfcf-0000779fd2ac.html#axzz1b5g4HL6A

 

Let me just highlight something here for those of you that just don’t get it:

When powerful people begin to see hidden narratives and plots around them,  the consequences can be dangerous. In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, one of my  more conspiratorial pals told me: “Iraq did this. Take a look at Laurie  Mylroie’s book.” So I bought a copy of Ms Mylroie’s work, Saddam Hussein’s  Unfinished War Against America.

It attempted to prove that the Iraqis had been behind numerous terrorist  attacks on the US, including the first assault on the World Trade Center in  1993. But even more interesting than the contents of the book were the glowing  endorsements on the back - from people such as Paul Wolfowitz, then number two  at the defence department and Richard Perle, then chairman of the Pentagon’s  advisory board. The Mylroie thesis has now been widely debunked. But – at a  crucial moment – some important American officials bought the theory that Iraq  was the hidden hand behind terrorist attacks on America.

Many conspiracy theorists are convinced that there is a secret story behind  America’s decision to invade Iraq. It is also possible, however, that America  went to war partly because some senior officials had themselves fallen prey to a  conspiracy theory. But perhaps I am getting lost in the wilderness of  mirrors.

 

Gideon! I refuse to call you a twat (even though this suggests you are) but you suggest Wolfowitz and Perle FELL VICTIM to a conspiracy theory?? They WROTE it (not the book, but the whole “Iraq being behind 9/11″ fiction) long before the book suggested it and guess what? They happen to be jews! So why wouldn’t Richard Perle write such a glowing review of the book? What were you saying about blaming things on a social group? But no, just like every Irishman was not a member of the IRA (but perhaps should have been, who knows?) not every jew is a zionist while zionism IS completely different to judaism as well you know. If it weren’t then how can we have Christian zionists? How can we have VP Joe Biden proclaim himself zionist? How can we have David Cameron and William Hague and a whole lot more on BOTH sides of the political spectrum proclaim themselves “Zionist”? Are they JEWS? No! They’re Zionists! Meanwhile we have the “Roman Catholic” Tony Blair as one nasty little fcuker of a Fabian Zionist corporate whore getting pimped out by the Rothschilds to make his fortune through JP Morgan!

Shut the fcuk up Gideon until you learn some shit!

“Move over, Tom Clancy; Laurie Mylroie has written the year’s thriller. Based on
a thorough examination of the evidence..”. — Richard N. Perle, Assistant
Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy, 1981-1987

Perle the PNAC, neocon who went on British TV hours after the 9/11 events with Barak (the Israeli PM) screaming for the US to hit Iraq, Libya, Syria, Sudan etc when it was all about Bin Laden (or it was MEANT to be!) Do you think EVERYONE is gullible Gideon?

Here’s another one:

“Laurie Mylroie understands that what we do not yet know about terrorism, crime,
and war may be more important…” — Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, U.S. Ambassador to
the United Nations, 1981-1985

Now let’s look at Jeane Kirkpatrick shall we?

She was a staunch supporter of the State of Israel. Anti-Defamation League  President Abraham Foxman  issued a press release upon her passing saying that “She will be fondly remembered for her unwavering and valiant support of the State of Israel and her unequivocal opposition to anti-Semitism, especially during her tenure at the United Nations. She was always a true friend of the Jewish people.”

4941_94.htm

That’s like Abe Foxman telling me that Tony Blair is a hero! Or on the other hand, me telling Abe Foxman that Yitzhak Rabin was a hero!

Who the FCUK does Abe Foxman think he is to tell the American people (not Israeli zionists/pro zionist christian fanatics) who their heroes and heroines are? Oh yeah, I forgot, he’s a “chosen one”.

And here’s another one….

“In this … Laurie Mylroie shows that a thorough, incisive, solitary scholar
can be worth far more than battalions of bureaucrats.” — R. James Woolsey,
Director of Central Intellegence, 1993-1995

Woolsey is a member of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and was one of the signatories to the January 26, 1998 letter sent to President Clinton that called for the removal of Saddam Hussein. Of course Gideon either won’t know what PNAC is and the people who complement it (doubtful) OR he just doesn’t like to acknowledge the neocon/zionist faction because it dwells in the shadows of “Conspiracy theory”.

Within hours of the September 11 attacks, Woolsey appeared on television suggesting Iraqi complicity. In September 2002, as Congress was deliberating authorizing President Bush to use force against Iraq, Woolsey told The Wall Street Journal that he believed that Iraq was also connected to the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993.

Aye sure Gideon, ALL these people just fell for rubbish being spouted by Laurie Mylroie! Get a fricking brain man! Or better still, stop assuming your readership don’t have any!

 

Actually Gideon, I’ve reconsidered. Perhaps you are!

KISS MY ARSE EuGENE!

Or should that be JEWGene? – And AGAIN, don’t talk SHIT by trying to suggest I’M “anti semitic”! It’s their own words which continuously expose them – “them” being those jews who subscribe to this ideology and YES there is one HELL of a lot of them! Not all I am quick to say but a HELL of a lot and they are not shy to come right out with it.

HIS is the sickening RACIST comment not mine! I’m one of these supposed “gentiles” and I take SERIOUS offence at these CUNTS who think I’m here to pander to them! Get the FCUKING PICTURE NOW DETECTIVE?? Go and INVESTIGATE this racist SON OF A BITCH! I’m making a complaint now and yes, you can collaborate with the American police to track this cunt down! But nah, you won’t!

 

YOU start looking into the mentality and ideology of these freaks before making a judgement on ANYONE who retorts to it. Sometimes it’s subtle but you can still SMELL the attitude which emanates from them even if it isn’t quite as “in your face” as this prick!