Please, before you David Icke aficionados go nuts at this, please step back, take a deep breath and THINK!
I happen to appreciate the information and exposure which Icke and friends (including Alex Jones) give to this corrupt and deadly New World Order etc. I attended Bilderberg on two days (Thursday and Saturday) and I conversed with both gentlemen on various topics and I appreciate their work (to an extent). HOWEVER, I am NOT one to just accept all that is stated by these two gentlemen passively without question. We question everything and everyone today. We question the mainstream media and we criticise them constantly.
I picked up on what was happening in our world before I had ever heard of David Icke and Alex Jones. I then came to hear about them and recognised something that I wasn’t aware of – I was not alone in realising the world was not as it seemed and so much was obscured from us. So, of course, I picked up on what these two (and others) were talking about and pointing out and, to a great extent (I guess about 95%) I am in line with both of them. However, as I said, I do not just accept everything they lay down without question EVEN THOUGH I will even keep an open mind on many of Mr Icke’s more fantastic claims because I have come to recognise over a long period of years that there is just so much I would never have believed was probable is, in fact, fact.
That said. I do not like anyone being deceived or “abused” through their naivety (or desperation). We all wish for change – real change – and we all support these guys to varying degrees. BUT…. David Icke, in my humble view, has crossed the rubicon with his latest “venture” which is the new TV/Radio station/channel which he is hoping to get off the ground and make a success of. I certainly wish him well with it (even though I have reservations about one or two of the “personalities” he is suggesting will be part of it. This is in no way an attempt to undermine the venture. I want a “People’s Voice” as much as any of you. I will also support David’s attempts to create such a forum and vehicle for such.
There are many people (and it is growing from what I see and hear) who are questioning the “agendas” of people Like Icke and Jones. They suggest they are “shills” for the establishment and for the NWO. I don’t for one moment believe that for, if they were, they must be stupid. Not only stupid, they, in their knowledge of the endgame, know that they would be helping in the establishment of a world in which THEIR offspring would be imprisoned and enslaved as much as yours and mine. Does anyone seriously think they are that dumb? It COULD be that, unknown to us, both of these men have been approached and told that they can continue to preach and talk on their subjects BUT there are certain subjects which may not be covered – such as that of the LEGAL PERSON and the ACTUAL con of the Banking system which is not just fractional reserve but the fundamental con being that the banks DO NOT CREATE MONEY OUT OF NOTHING but that they STEAL our own promissory obligations and RE-PRESENT them as Bank promissory obligations (Banknotes/Money). They then charge interest on these “re-presentations” of our own promissory obligations. Otherwise, it is entirely possible for us to issue our promissory obligations directly to one another AND THEREFORE, no banks are necessary whatsoever.
Mr Icke and Mr Jones do not cover either of these topics and refuse to discuss/debate them. That leaves MASSIVE QUESTIONS in my mind particularly when both gents speak and preach about “openness” and “willingness to debate” and they hold the MSM in disdain for not addressing al that they do appropriately or in detail. Well, I have to state that THEY do not address the two foregoing issues satisfactorily (if at all) for my liking.
However, back to the point: The People’s Voice.
Mr Icke, with others, incessantly go on about the Banking system and “the creation of money out of thin air” (which is fundamentally wrong). YET, what do we have with “The People’s Voice” business venture?
Well, under any other circumstances, a business venture is normally funded by investors (seed capital from “Angel Investors” or Venture Capital companies who expect a return on their investment) or by the banks themselves. If it isn’t then the money has to come from the person creating the business themselves. After all, it is their vision and it is their risk.
David Icke, in this case, has been asking for donations to reach £100K (he is now asking for that figure to go much higher). All well and good and I can hear so many of you saying “Well it is for a good cause”. That may well be the case and I am not disputing that. HOWEVER, what David is NOT offering to the people who are funding HIS business venture, is a share in it!
DAVID ICKE IS, THEREFORE – THERE IS NO ARGUMENT HERE – CREATING MONEY FOR HIMSELF, OUT OF THIN AIR! JUST PRECISELY AS THE CENTRAL BANKS DO WHO HE CASTIGATES FOR DOING SO! HE IS GETTING MONEY (your money) FOR NOTHING!
There is absolutely no harm in your funding his business BUT, if he is so grateful and if it is for you, then WHY is he not offering a stake in it? EVEN IF it doesn’t work out and is a flop, you may not get anything from it BUT, at the very least, he had given you an opportunity for gain. The very people I assume he is hoping to help and he is NOT giving you the opportunity of benefitting from the investment you make in his venture! If it is TRULY the people’s voice then he must SURELY give the people, who’s voice he wishes to project, the benefit of having a share in the investment AND, therefore, a say in WHAT “voice” it is they wish to project! THAT is “democratic” and THAT is fair! Otherwise, it is a vehicle for David Icke ONLY to project the voice HE determines is yours! THAT is dangerous!
He surely knows that and can see the logical reality in that.
So, there will be SO MANY who, in their excitement and in their hope, will pledge their money and donate to this venture BUT they are refusing to see and acknowledge what they are doing is acting as a Venture Capitalist or “Angel Investor” and they are getting NOTHING for their good faith.
DAVID ICKE SHOULD KNOW BETTER IF HE TRULY CONSIDERS THE BENEFIT OF US ALL.
I would, quite happily, fund his venture but, I am afraid, I will not allow David Icke to”create money out of nothing” with his own version of Quantitative Easing.
DAVID, YOU DISAPPOINT ME! Give those who invest in your business venture their rightful return. If you do not then you are subject to intense questioning. You lose nothing in doing so except 100% control and, if profitable, less than 100% of the profits made. But we are “all one” David therefore you should be more than willing to share in the success. IF it is not a success then no-one wins anyhow. At this point however, you are acting as the consummate capitalist banker! HOW IRONIC!
THE PEOPLE’S VOICE BUT NOT THE PEOPLE’S INVESTMENT – THAT’S DAVID’S! (but with the People’s money!)
Rt Hon John Bercow MP Member of Parliament for Buckingham Thank you for your email. If you are a constituent and are contacting me for assistance or to raise an issue, please ensure your contact details are included in your email. If they are not, please resend your original email giving your name, full postal address and phone number. All forms of correspondence are treated equally so please do not be disappointed if you do not receive an immediate response to your email. However, I do aim to reply as quickly as possible and I will prioritise a case if it is genuinely urgent. Due to strict Parliamentary protocol, MPs are only permitted to take up casework on behalf of their own constituents. If you are not a constituent, I advise you to contact your own MP. You can find out who they are here:http://www.writetothem.com/ Occasionally, people contact me on behalf of a friend or relative. If that person is an adult, and unless you hold a power of attorney, then I will need to receive written authorisation from the individual granting you permission to make enquiries on their behalf. If you have contacted me via a standard email campaign I will try my best to respond. However, the high volume of correspondence that I receive means I have to prioritise individually written emails. My constituency is Buckingham; which includes Bierton, Brill, Buckingham North, Buckingham South, Cheddington, Edlesborough, Great Brickhill, Great Horwood, Grendon Underwood, Haddenham, Long Crendon, Luffield Abbey, Marsh Gibbon, Newton Longville, Pitstone, Quainton, Steeple Claydon, Stewkley, Tingewick, Waddesdon, Weedon, Wing, Wingrave, Winslow, Icknield and The Risboroughs. If you have contacted me in my capacity as Speaker of the House of Commons, your email will be forwarded to the Speaker’s Office for attention. Yours sincerely John Bercow I liked the reference to the website "Writetothem". It reminded me of a song..... Received from Michael Meacher's office:
Thank you for your email which I will bring to Michael Meacher’s attention.
Rt Hon Michael Meacher MP
Oldham West & Royton
House of Commons
020 7219 6461
11 Church Lane
Oldham OL1 3AN
0161 626 5779
I was wetting myself at this. Perhaps because it was right in front of my face.
The Bilderberg cops. Just like yesterday’s MP (my previous upload): They’ll talk shit to your face but NEVER to a camera!
All so scared of their state ventriloquist who has it’s arm up their arse!
Seemingly, they took an oath to Bilderberg to protect the REAL criminals.
And here was me thinking they served and protected us! I’m just naive I guess!
A phrase comes to mind: SHIT FLOATS!
Breach of contract. Promissory estoppel.
Subject: RE: My termination
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:56:56 +0100
Initially please accept my apologies for not responding before today – they have only just been re-directed to me again (I was not previously seeing them as they were being looked after by others while I was ill) (Many thanks for your best wishes – I am still off sick and will be for at least another month)
I don’t propose to go in to great detail but 3 months ago we all had high hopes that you would succeed, it became obvious as time progressed that this was not the case. As far as the job was concerned I will not apologies for you losing it (it was down to you to make a success of that) however I would not of wished to place you in financial difficulties and for that I am sorry.
I wish you the very best for the future and hope you find a position quickly
From: Mark Welsh
Sent: 15 August 2012 17:37
Subject: My termination
I simply wish to ask you one thing. Why, approximately three months ago did you advise me that there was no problem and that I had permanent employment, in answer to my statement and question “I am thinking about buying a property rather than renting. Would I be safe to assume to do this?”
On the basis of your reply, I went on to purchase a property which, not only had me commit to a 5year fixed interest mortgage with huge penalties attached so that I now cannot sell the property, but I also bought a property in significant disrepair and would even discuss it with you afterward while you also “ok’d” the P60 issuance which I needed to prove my employment to the mortgage lender.
Not only that but only last week I took on a further significant investment of £5700 for glazing while I have spent over £3000 on bathroom renovation.
All of this, Richard, on your word that I had permanent employment after 3 months into the job. The 3 months which was originally suggested as a probationary period but which then changed to 6 months when I was sent the contract to sign.
Legally, you are entitled to do whatever you wish with the employment of someone if within their probationary period (which was formally 6 months as stated) but, morally, just let me ask you. Now that you have put me in one hell of a financial mess, how do you live with that?
I simply wish to know, are you man enough to even apologise? It doesn’t change my circumstances but it, at least, would show you have some integrity.
Other than that, I wish you well and hope your health improves.
Scanned by Demon MailDefender
JUST THE FACT RICHARD. ONLY EVER THE FACTS!
What’s the bloody point?
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 4:10 PM
> To: PNLD
> Subject: Question Asked from England and Wales FAQ Web Site
> Earthling has requested that the following question be added to the PNLD FAQ web site.
> Here’s a question for you: Do you even understand the law? You enforce it but BY GOD you don’t understand it! While you protect the bloody criminals in our government and banks and the Bilderbergers. You IDIOTS! How do you expect anyone to recognise your authority? You HAVE none!
> If you call yourself “Police” then DO something about the TREASON which is being progressed on the 6th to the 9th of June in Watford at the annual Bilderberg conference. OTHERWISE, you’re as useful to yourselves and any of the rest of us as a fart in a spacesuit!
> Now get your bloody job done or screw your rights like anyone else’s!
> But my guess is you won’t even understand what is evidence put right before you! If not, then ask! You MIGHT then be able to actually do a bloody job rather than be an ignorant jobs worth!
> YOUR families are being screwed by these people as much as anyone else’s. Are you even smart enough to recognise this?
> You took an oath and, within that oath is the requirement to uphold the law! Were you advised to ignore Constitutional law? NO you bloody well were not! But you do. Why? Because your taught codes and statutes and that’s all you know!
> You don’t uphold “law” you enforce petty statutes which are put in place to control us and to control you. While the austerity that Bilderberg and the UN and British government impose on you as well as us, leads to the riots you then have to quell! Yet it is all done to protect THEIR interests not yours! Meanwhile, WE (and you) pay for the policing protection afforded to these criminals on the 6th to 9th of June. You know what that means? You are nothing but “house negroes” on a slave plantation. You bloody ignorant idiots!
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:51:09 +0100
> Subject: RE: Question Asked from England and Wales FAQ Web Site [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
> You will be aware that the ‘contact form’ you completed states that we are a central, national unit for legal enquiries and not an operational Police Force. We are therefore unable to accept reports of crimes on behalf of the local operational police forces.
> If you believe that an offence has been committed, then you will need to report the details to your local police force directly, either in person at your nearest police station or via the 101 non-emergency telephone number. They will advise you whether the evidence you have is sufficient and of the likelihood of progressing the matter.
> We would advise that that when making an official report to your local police force, you use less abusive/insulting language, as this is unlikely to assist your cause.
> FEEDBACK REQUEST:
> We would like to ensure that we provide a useful and accurate service to our customers. To enable us to monitor the service we provide, we would be grateful if you could give a moment of your time to reply to this email with some brief feedback:
> TO WHAT EXTENT WERE YOU SATISFIED WITH THE REPLY YOU RECEIVED FROM PNLD?
> Please reply to this email, indicating the level of service which you feel you received:
> VERY GOOD – It fully met my requirements and was very helpful.
> GOOD – I received the information I needed to answer my question.
> POOR – The reply I received was not clear to me and did not fully answer my question.
> VERY POOR – The answer did not meet my needs and I have had to seek advice elsewhere.
> PLEASE ADD ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS THAT YOU WISH TO MAKE REGARDING THE SERVICE YOU HAVE RECEIVED FROM PNLD.
> Please note:
> PNLD are providing a free service and as such we do not have the resources to research every email in depth. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the information provided is correct, we cannot guarantee it, and we cannot accept any liability for any action taken as a result of the contents of this email and/or any attachments. This reply is intended as a guide only and the advice you are given is based on the information provided. You are advised to seek professional advice before any further action is taken. See the PNLD Terms and Conditions, and the disclaimer provided by West Yorkshire Police (a link to which can be found at the bottom of the page), for further information.
The British Government’s Hate speech
I assume you have NOTHING to say regarding my (and many others) treatment under the “law” of the United Kingdom relating to the Breach of Contract by a legal personality known as a “Corporation”. I am in no way surprised at your lack of response.
However, I wish to bring something to your attention regarding the deceiving hypocrisy of who are MEANT to be MY Government Representatives as MY Parliamentary representative.
A few days ago, it would seem that a certain Lee Rigby was murdered on the streets of Woolwich, London. Since then, there has been an outcry by Members of Parliament for the introduction of what is colloquially known as “The Snooper’s charter”.
What the internet has to do with two men with issues making the decision to murder someone has to do with the internet is beyond me! Was there no hate? No wars? No murders? No politically motivated violence before the internet? Were, for example, the Irgun and friends influenced into terrorism, and blowing up the King David Hotel in the late 1940s, by the internet Mr Green? “We’re” quick to forget such when it suits us aren’t “we”?
Consider the over 100 people murdered in the streets of London every year. When was the last time I heard the government shout “It’s the internet” about those killings? When did the government suggest that the people who carried out the killings were influenced by the internet, the television, violent video games or some other influence? Where was the media outcry about any one of these other murders to the extent of that of Lee Rigby?
I’ll tell you where: NOWHERE!
Now why would that be do you think? Don’t try to pull the wool over MY eyes Mr Green! The reason is that there was political collateral to be made out of this and just ONE example of that “collateral” is the Government attempting to suggest that the internet should be more closely controlled. Now I wonder why they would feel so strongly about achieving that? Perhaps it has something to do with what Zbigniew Brzezinski (you have heard of him I assume?) stated recently: That people are becoming more politically active and it represents a threat to the existing status quo of who controls and who rules. If you’re not aware of this, I suggest you look up Mr Brzezinski (and possibly his writings such as “The Grand Chessboard” and “Strategic vision”). In the latter, Mr Brzezinski says the following:
Indeed, the changing distribution of global power and the new phenomenon of massive political awakening intensify, each in its own way, the volatility of contemporary international relations.
Now, unless one is incompetently minded – which I don’t assume for one moment that you are – one can see, quite clearly, why the British government would wish to have MUCH better control over the internet. After all, it is hard for them to maintain their power and control over the population while that population, everyday, sees the sheer never-ending corruption, nepotism and deception which those in government (on all sides of the political fence) involve themselves in.
However, to the crucial point of this communication Mr Green:
While our esteemed Parliament cry out for such control over that which the population can be exposed to (from the mistaken idea that people commit such atrocities, do so simply due to exposure of the “hate speech” and extremist ideologies which can be found on the medium) because they feel that “impressionable minds” can be influenced by such; I would state this -
WHAT THE HELL DO OUR GOVERNMENT CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING IS DOING?
The year is 2040. There have been riots in the streets of London after Britain has run out of petrol because of an oil crisis in the Middle East. Protesters have attacked public buildings. Several policemen have died. Consequently, the Government has deployed the Army to curb the protests. After two days the protests have been stopped but twenty-five protesters have been killed by the Army. You are the Prime Minister. Write the script for a speech to be broadcast to the nation in which you explain why employing the Army against violent protesters was the only option available to you and one which was both necessary and moral.
That question was set in an exam to boys of 13 years old in Eton Boy’s school!
Are you going to even consider suggesting that instilling such ideas into boys of 13 years of age (who, it is my guess, the present “establishment” consider as those most likely to move into political circles – after all they do don’t they? All the family connections, wealth and power. What else would most of the jacked up little shits do? I mean let’s be straight here shall we? We have a “Chancellor of the Exchequer who has a poor degree in Modern History. Not a single monetary or economics certificate to his name! While we have a “Prime Minister” who has as much flair, panache and gravitas as – well, frankly, as any other MP, Barrister, Judge or little morsel who came crawling out of private school to enter the world of politics and law. ZERO!) is NOT influential on their “impressionable minds”? This conditioning of boys with a question (and I’m sure there are many more such “moral” questions within their curriculum) which should never even be considered, is creating the impression in their minds that such murder of people who are anti-establishment (with bloody good reason) is quite acceptable. After all, our “Human Rights Act” allows for such murder by the state when the state decides (to protect itself) that, whatever activity it does not like, is a “riot” or an “insurrection”. “Lawfully taken” of course. It just so happens that it is the very state which decides what an “insurrection” is and what is “lawful”. Strange idea that is isn’t it? “We can murder you because we say it’s lawful”.
Indeed Mr Green, the United Kingdom is a free, democratic society! Get me a drink will you? It might calm my hilarity!
How about the POSSIBILITY (read probability) that it was not the INTERNET that influenced these two killers but MI5 who had been involved with them to one extent or the other for a period of 8 years?
Listen Mr Green, people are recognising the agenda in greater and greater numbers.
So, my expectation of you Mr Green – as MY representative in Parliament – is that you bring up this question IN parliament, making it clear that this abject hypocrisy and the conditioning, by way of “education” is unacceptable to the people of this country. I am one of those people and I am sure, if the population understood this sheer hypocrisy of its establishment, it would be less than happy! Do you think the people of the United Kingdom would not be outraged at the thought that their freedom of expression is being eradicated? As long as they keep subscribing to the bullshit that their vote for any one of 3 or 4 acceptable political parties is “democracy at work in a free society”, they won’t experience an “issue” with the British Government!
The British establishment: “”You see that box over there? That’s your democracy. Stay within that and you’ll be ok. Step out of it of course and you’re dead!” I wonder just how deep the British establishment’s hatred of its own people goes Mr Green?
The question is: Do you even consider yourself MY representative or have you been conditioned into believing you are, somehow, elevated to some position of “power” as our governments like to keep telling us that they are in!
CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS? MY BLOODY MP DIDN’T EVEN BOTHER TO READ PAST THE FIRST SENTENCE!!
They REPRESENT us? They LISTEN?? They are a fucking JOKE! Incompetent and impotent fools!
Subject: RE: The British Government’s Hate speech
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 12:57:10 +0000
Thank you for your latest email. As far as I can see from your previous emails you are now disputing the legal advice given to you by the barrister who looked at your case. You are of course free to do this but I have not responded because I am not legally qualified and therefore I cannot sensibly take sides in this dispute.
SO MY REPLY:
As described in one of my recent blogs – “The New Economics will be Mathematics” – it SHOULD be apparent to those who have read it that MONEY IS NOT CREATED BY BANKS.
WE CREATE THE MONEY BY WAY OF OUR PROMISSORY OBLIGATIONS.
It is a deception so incredibly well disguised because we think of money as a physical thing (those notes and coins in your pocket) while most of those who consider the problem of money and interest and look for a solution, do so from the perspective that money is some form of physical matter. IT IS NOT and it is understanding that which allows the “penny to drop” and for you to see the deception clearly.
MONEY (PAPER BASED, GOLD/SILVER, BITCOIN OR JUST ELECTRONIC) IS ONLY A PHYSICAL REPRESENTATION OF WHAT REAL MONEY (VALUE) IS. WHEN YOU HAVE MONEY IN YOUR BANK OR POCKET, ALL IT IS, IS A REPRESENTATION OF VALUE YOU HAVE PRODUCED WITHIN THE ECONOMY. YOUR SALARY FOR A JOB, THE SELLING OF AN ASSET (A WATCH, A HOUSE) – ALL OF THAT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS REPRESENTED BY THE MONEY, THE PAPER, THE ELECTRONIC DIGITS IN THE BANK’S COMPUTER. WITHOUT YOUR ACTUAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, THAT MONEY DOES NOT EXIST.
NOW SOME PEOPLE, LOOKING AT THIS MONETARY ISSUE, CONSIDER THE PROBLEM TO BE “DEBT”. NO, NO, NO! I USED TO BELIEVE THE SAME: MONEY = DEBT etc; THE BILL STILL ANALYSIS, THE ZEIGEIST ANALYSIS.
MONEY, IN IT’S VARIOUS PHYSICAL MANIFESTATIONS, REPRESENTS DEBT, YES,. BUT DEBT IS NOT THE PROBLEM! WE ALL – EVERY ONE OF US – ARE INDEBTED TO EACH OTHER IN MANY WAYS, NOT JUST MONETARILY. IF SOMEONE SAVES YOUR LIFE, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU WILL SAY “I AM INDEBTED TO YOU” AND YOU WILL SAY IT HAPPILY. IS THAT A BAD THING? NO. IN A MARRIAGE, WE ARE INDEBTED TO EACH OTHER. WE CONSIDER THAT THE MARRIAGE IS ONE OF GIVE AND TAKE AND LOOKING OUT FOR THE OTHER. WE ARE PLEDGING EACH OTHER OUR LOVE. WE ARE INDEBTED IN THAT SENSE.
THE WORLD’S POPULATION IS NATURALLY IN DEBT. WE ARE TO EACH OTHER – IF NOT, WE ALL LIVE AND EXIST ON THIS WORLD AS HERMITS NEVER INTERACTING. AS SOON AS THERE IS AN INTERACTION OF ANY KIND, THERE IS A DEBT.
SO WE TRADE! BUT INSTEAD OF BARTERING AND SOMEONE SELLING A CHICKEN LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO BUY IT WITH SHOES THAT HE NEEDS (WHICH COULD TAKE AN IMMENSE AMOUNT OF TIME IN A GLOBAL WORLD?) WE HAVE INTRODUCED A SYSTEM WHERE THERE IS A PHYSICAL REPRESENTATION OF VALUE. THIS “PHYSICAL MONEY” THEN JUST MAKES LIFE EASIER FOR BROWSING AROUND LOOKING FOR THE SHOES YOU WANT WITHOUT CARRYING YOUR CHICKEN EVERYWHERE! IN THE LATTER CASE, YOU WOULD LOOK KIND OF ODD WOULDN’T YOU?
CREDIT/DEBT IS NOT A BAD THING IF IT REPRESENTS THE REAL ECONOMY AND INTERACTION! IT IS INTEREST WHICH IS THE “DEBT” WHICH NEED NOT EXIST AND WHICH CREATES THE WORLD’S MISERY. THE BANKS (THE USURERS) HAVE “HIJACKED” OUR OWN DEBTS, RE-PUBLISHED THEM – REPRESENTING THESE OBLIGATIONS IN THE PHYSICAL FORM AS THEIR MONEY (HAVING BEEN HANDED THE ONE AND ONLY LICENCE TO PRINT THESE REPRESENTATIONS BY OUR GOVERNMENTS) AND CHARGE US ALL INTEREST ON OUR OWN PRINCIPAL WHILE ASKING US TO PAY THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST BACK TO THEM. GLOBALLY, THERE IS NO INTEREST MONEY IN THE ECONOMY! SO HOW CAN IT BE POSSIBLE FOR PRINCIPAL ONLY (THAT IS ALL THAT IS ISSUED) TO PAY BACK PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST?
ANSWER: IT ISN’T!
GLOBAL DEBT IS NOT A PROBLEM IT IS A MUST!
INTEREST AND THE OBSCURATION OF OUR REAL DEBT, OUR PROMISSORY OBLIGATIONS AND WHO IS THE TRUE OBLIGOR AND CREDITOR IS THE PROBLEM!
16th May 2013 – 20.03GMT
The Vatican has, today, pronounced that new Jesuit Pope Francis is the new Messiah.
Unknown to many christians around the world (all who preach that they read their bibles conscientiously), one of Christ’s teachings spoke about usury, and Christ, himself, up-ended the moneychangers’ tables in the Temple due to their usury. Yet many christians cannot even tell you what usury is! They have never heard of the word.
Now, however, due to Pope Francis’ spiritual intervention using the CERN laboratory in Geneva Switzerland, the banker’s satanic reign has finally ended. According to unnamed sources in the vatican bank (now isn’t that somewhat ironic?) the Pope gave a special “mass” at the laboratory where he proceeded to turn the “mass” of the Higgs Boson particle (known as the “God particle”) into the wrath of god energy. A different kind of mass then!
The words Pope Francis is reported to have used during the mass were reported by undisclosed Cardinals of the Benedictine order and were said to include words such as “Rothschild”, “Zionist”, “Cunt” not necessarily in that order but in what we are told to be the latin insults to Satan!
A sensational result of the Pope’s actions is the disappearance of 5 Bank of International Settlements Bankers through a black hole in the “Chinatown” district of Geneva. This is interesting in itself because most Swiss were not even aware that there was such a district. Unconfirmed reports refer to the bankers having been attempting to flee the city with the World’s global debt of over $40Trillion which they had downloaded onto a thumb drive including nude photos of the Pope with a number of well known Argentinian child celebrities. Once Pope Michael uttered the wording within his mass however, the God Particle transmutated into pure energy centred on the car’s GPS coordinates and created a black hole. People close to the scene said they heard the screams of one banker – reportedly, Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs – an eye witness stating he heard “I was only doing God’s work”. It would seem God didn’t agree with him!
The Vatican has now made a statement, reportedly, saying that the world’s debt has now been extinguished.
Beijing, however, have reported a similar black hole opening up underneath the Chinese Central Bank and they’ve found a thumb drive closely resembling that lost in the Geneva black hole.
Pope Francis has been unavailable for comment. Some anonymous sources within the Jesuit order have stated that the Black Pope is furious with the Pontiff since, it would seem, the second appearance of a black hole in Beijing should have manifested itself under the Vatican bank. It is considered by other unknown, anonymous and undisclosed (just to make that point certain) sources that Pope Francis purposefully chanted the Beijing coordinates in the hope that he could have his nude pictures as far away from Rome as possible. Realising, however, that the thumb drive turned up in Beijing, it is most likely that the Pontiff is now in hiding, possibly alongside Osama Bin Laden.
Pope Benedict refused to comment but simply smiled in that off-putting Emperor way he does.
May 16th 2013 – 18.32GMT
Angelina Jolie, having decided to have her perfectly functional tits removed (the actions of a slightly deranged woman of unsound mind) may have had an ulterior motive behind the decision. According to anonymous sources close to the actress and UN Special Envoy, Ms Jolie has donated her tits to Christies, the London auction house who have preserved the items in the sperm of a rhinoceros which, according to an undisclosed chemical biologist, may have just the correct consistency and ingredients to both, maintain the perfect specimens for future use by the purchaser plus ensure that the non existent disease in the tissue of Ms Jolie’s tits, would never materialise.
Ms Jolie is said to be furious with her tit removal prankologist that he did not advise her, prior to the operation, that rhino sperm had the capacity to remove the possibility of disease. Her prankologist has replied that, while it is not 100% certain that the sperm would have this effect, if it does, it would be common to all sperm and not simply rhinoceros’. Indeed, the prankologist has suggested that, if this were to be correct, then human sperm, if ejaculated onto female breasts on a regular basis, would eradicate any possibility of the specific disease Ms Jolie was concerned about. He further stated that, if this were proven, it is highly likely that sperm would have such desirable effects upon all tissues of the homo sapien female. When asked whether it would have the same effect for males, he suggested it was unlikely due to the “magnetic” functionality of the chromosomes thereby repelling the effects on male tissue.
Meanwhile, there has already been intense interest by potential buyers of Ms Jolie’s tits. Among those rumoured to have an interest are:
Brad Pitt: He is suggested to have said to close acquaintances, for which Reuters cannot confirm sources, that he misses them badly considering that the new prosthetic versions have tiny nipples (due to Angelina’s wish to go braless without causing too much of an uproar). Mr Pitt has been reported to say that “Angelina had nipples like ripe strawberries whereas, now, they’re the size of coriander seeds.”
Hilary Clinton: It would appear from other unconfirmed and anonymous sources, that Mrs Clinton still suffers from continuous nightmares of Bill describing to her what it was that attracted him to Monica Lewinsky. It seems that Bill’s sperm had fallen on a very similar set of mammaries as that of Angelina’s. Mrs Clinton’s interest, then is not so much in owning the boobs but having them sit on her desk at home while she asks Bill to rub his penis between them. It seems she has invested in a few grams of thermite explosive which, having been applied to the tits, the rubbing of Bill’s prick between them shall cause enough friction of the tits and Bill’s penis to explode. It seems it is some form of satanic ritual she will carry out on 9/11 of this year where the two tits will represent the twin towers and Bill’s “cigar” representing flight 175.
Beyonce: Jay Zee has watched the Arnold Schwarzenegger movie “Total Recall” so many times that he has requested that Beyonce recreate the woman of his dreams. Beyonce is only missing one tit. Why no-one recognises that that extra tit is her boyfriend is beyond me!
We intend to keep you abreast of developments!
Moral: If you just accept that Angelina Jolie has had her tits surgically removed when there is absolutely no disease in them (so “just in case”) because SHE says so and it is supported by her Doctor who “says so” and the media who “says so” then, once more, it proves you will accept anything that you are “fed”. While, indeed, if she has taken this decision and has had them removed, the woman is in need of serious serious therapy! So much so that this woman and her husband should be given a mental health assessment for the purposes of allowing them to adopt children.
I just KNEW there’d be a story and ulterior motive behind this!
Someone PROVE to me this woman had her breasts removed! PROVE IT!
No, seriously, I’m getting very tired of idiocy and the fact that the corporate media are being allowed by the idiotic masses to treat you like imbeciles. But then so many of you are because you swallow shit like this….
Boston bombing suspect wrote message in boat: CBS News report
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was found hiding in a boat days after the blasts, left a handwritten message describing the attack as retribution for U.S. wars in Muslim countries, CBS News reported on Thursday.
The CBS News report, citing anonymous sources, said that Tsarnaev used a pen to write the message on an interior wall of the boat, where police found him bleeding from gunshot wounds four days after the April 15 bombing.
The note summed up with the idea that “when you attack one Muslim, you attack all Muslims,” CBS News reported.
CBS News did not make clear how its sources knew the information and Reuters was not immediately able to confirm the report.
A spokeswoman for the FBI in Boston, Katherine Gulotta, declined to confirm or deny the report.
The CBS News report said Tsarnaev, 19, described his older brother and fellow suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who died in a gunbattle with police, as “a martyr.”
“Basically, the note says … the bombings were retribution for the U.S. crimes against Muslims in places like Iraq and Afghanistan and that the victims of the Boston bombing were ‘collateral damage,’ the same way innocent victims have been collateral damage in U.S. wars around the world,” said CBS News reporter John Miller, who is a former spokesman for the FBI.
The bombings at the finish line of the world-famous marathon killed three people and injured 264 others. The FBI identified the ethnic Chechen brothers as suspects from video and pictures at the scene.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was arrested in Watertown, Massachusetts, on April 19 after a daylong manhunt and lockdown of much of the Boston area. He is being held in a prison hospital west of Boston and faces charges that could carry the death penalty if he is convicted.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been on a U.S. government database of potential terrorism suspects and the United States had twice been warned by Russia that he might be an Islamic militant, according to U.S. security officials.
“citing anonymous sources”
“CBS News did not make clear how its sources knew the information and Reuters was not immediately able to confirm the report.”
Please god! Give me strength!
The reuters/CBS article then goes on to tell you what this anonymously, unconfirmed message said!
I think they learned their journalistic skills in the primary school playground when they went about telling friends what other friends had purportedly said about them.
Meanwhile, what the reports didn’t say was that, while in the boat, the Muslim terrorist also wrote a song. Here it is (yes he actually had a 24 track recording studio in the boat too):
You’d have thought that, if he had any class, he would have written his note on the inside of the boat in blood! FAR more impactful!
Think about that one next time you make up this shit Zionist media ok?